<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE ThML PUBLIC 
    "-//CCEL/DTD Theological Markup Language//EN"
    "http://www.ccel.org/dtd/ThML10.dtd">
<!--
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xml"
    href="http://www.ccel.org/ss/thml.html.xsl" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl"
    href="http://www.ccel.org/ss/thml.html.xsl" ?>
-->
    
<!-- Copyright Christian Classics Ethereal Library -->
<ThML>
    <ThML.head>
        <generalInfo>
<description>
Samuel Hopkins studied under Jonathan Edwards, and became his official biographer as well as the executor of his papers. Greatly influenced 
by Edwards's thought, Hopkins took it upon himself to further elaborate on his mentor's views. <i>The System of Doctrines</i> outlines 
Hopkins's (and, by extension, Edwards's) systematic theology. This two-volume work lays out the basic tenets of the 'New Divinity' system 
of theology, a modified form of traditional Calvinism especially prominent in 18th century New England. This first volume discusses divine 
revelation, the nature of God, divine providence, and the role of Christ as Redeemer.

<br /><br />Kathleen O'Bannon<br />CCEL Staff
</description>

            <pubHistory>
            </pubHistory>
            <comments>Page images provided by Web Archive</comments>
        </generalInfo>
        <printSourceInfo>
            <published>Boston: Lincoln &amp; Edmands. (18112)</published>
</printSourceInfo>

<electronicEdInfo>
 <publisherID>ccel</publisherID>
 <authorID>hopkins_samuel</authorID>
 <bookID>sysdoc01</bookID>
 <workID>sysdoc01</workID>
 <bkgID>system_of_doctrines_contained_in_divine_relation_explained_and_defended_shewing_their_consistence_and_connexion_with_each_other_vol_i_(hopkins_samuel)</bkgID>
 <version />
 <series />

 <DC>
  <DC.Title>The System of Doctrines, contained in Divine Relation, Explained and Defended. Shewing Their Consistence and Connexion 
  with Each Other. Vol. I.</DC.Title>
  <DC.Title sub="short">The System of Doctrines Vol. 1</DC.Title>
  <DC.Creator sub="Author" scheme="short-form">Samuel Hopkins</DC.Creator>
  <DC.Creator sub="Author" scheme="file-as">Hopkins, Samuel (1721-1803)</DC.Creator>
  <DC.Publisher>Grand Rapids, MI: Christian Classics Ethereal Library</DC.Publisher>
  <DC.Subject scheme="LCCN" />
  <DC.Subject scheme="ccel">All</DC.Subject>
  <DC.Date sub="Created">2009-02-19</DC.Date>
  <DC.Type>Text.Monograph</DC.Type>
  <DC.Format scheme="IMT">text/html</DC.Format>
  <DC.Identifier scheme="URL">/ccel/hopkins_samuel/sysdoc01.html</DC.Identifier>
  <DC.Source />
  <DC.Source scheme="URL" />
  <DC.Language scheme="ISO639-3">eng</DC.Language>
  <DC.Rights />
 </DC>

</electronicEdInfo>
        
<style type="text/css">
body	{ line-height:150%; font-size:large; margin-left:20%; margin-right:20% }
.normal	{ text-indent:.25in; margin-top:9pt; text-align:justify }
.center	{ text-indent:0in; margin-top:9pt; text-align:center }
.right	{ text-indent:0in; margin-top:9pt; text-align:right }
</style>

<style type="text/xcss">
<selector element="body">
  <property name="line-height" value="150%" />
  <property name="font-size" value="large" />
  <property name="margin-left" value="20%" />
  <property name="margin-right" value="20%" />
</selector>
<selector class="normal">
  <property name="text-indent" value=".25in" />
  <property name="margin-top" value="9pt" />
  <property name="text-align" value="justify" />
</selector>
<selector class="center">
  <property name="text-indent" value="0in" />
  <property name="margin-top" value="9pt" />
  <property name="text-align" value="center" />
</selector>
<selector class="right">
  <property name="text-indent" value="0in" />
  <property name="margin-top" value="9pt" />
  <property name="text-align" value="right" />
</selector>
</style>

    </ThML.head>
    <ThML.body>

<div1 title="Title Page." prev="toc" next="ii" id="i">

<pb n="1" id="i-Page_1" />

<h4 id="i-p0.1">THE</h4>
<h1 id="i-p0.2">SYSTEM OF DOCTRINES,</h1>
<h4 id="i-p0.3">CONTAINED IN</h4>
<h1 id="i-p0.4">DIVINE REVELATION,</h1>
<h2 id="i-p0.5">EXPLAINED AND DEFENDED.</h2>
<h4 id="i-p0.6">SHEWING THEIR</h4>
<h3 id="i-p0.7">CONSISTENCE AND CONNEXION WITH EACH OTHER.</h3>
<h4 id="i-p0.8">TO WHICH IS ADDED,</h4>
<h2 id="i-p0.9">A TREATISE ON THE MILLENNIUM.</h2>
<div style="margin-top:48pt; margin-bottom:48pt" id="i-p0.10">
	<h4 id="i-p0.11">IN TWO VOLUMES. </h4>
</div>
<h2 id="i-p0.12">BY SAMUEL HOPKINS, D. D.</h2>
<h4 id="i-p0.13">LATE PASTOR OF THE 1st CONGREGATIONAL CHURCH IN NEWPORT.</h4>
<div style="margin-top:48pt; margin-bottom:36pt" id="i-p0.14">
	<h2 id="i-p0.15">VOL. I.</h2>
</div>
<div style="margin-top:48pt" id="i-p0.16">
	<h2 id="i-p0.17">SECOND EDITION.</h2>
	<h2 id="i-p0.18">BOSTON:</h2>
	<h4 id="i-p0.19">PRINTED AND PUBLISHED BY LINCOLN &amp; EDMANDS,</h4>
	<p class="center" id="i-p1">No. 53 Cornhill.</p>
	<p class="center" id="i-p2">1811.</p>
	<p class="center" id="i-p3"><i>Published according to Act of Congress</i>.</p>
</div>

<pb n="2" id="i-Page_2" />
<pb n="3" id="i-Page_3" />
</div1>

<div1 title="Prefatory Material." prev="i" next="ii.i" id="ii">

<div2 title="Preface." prev="ii" next="ii.ii" id="ii.i">


<h2 id="ii.i-p0.1">PREFACE.</h2>
<p class="normal" id="ii.i-p1"><i>SYSTEMATIC</i> Divinity is considered and treated, by many, 
with slight and contempt. And if a book be written in this form, and published under 
the title of a System or Body of Divinity, this is a sufficient reason, with them, 
to neglect it, as not worthy their attention. But can this be supported by any good 
reason? Is not a System of Divinity as proper and important, as a System of Jurisprudence, 
Physic, or natural Philosophy?</p>
<p class="normal" id="ii.i-p2">If the Bible be a revelation from heaven, it contains a System 
of consistent important Doctrines; which are so connected, and implied in each other, 
that one cannot be so well understood, if detached from all the rest, and considered 
by itself; and some must be first known, before others can be seen in a proper and 
true light. When all these are stated, and explained, according to Scripture, and 
in their true order, connection and dependence, a System of Doctrines is formed. 
This every person must do in some measure and degree, who understands the Bible. 
And he who would assist others in doing this, and set the Doctrines of Christianity 
in a clear light, and to the best advantage to be understood, <pb n="4" id="ii.i-Page_4" />will, 
of course, form a System of Truths. And so far as he falls short of this, or deviates 
from it, he must be defective and confused.</p>
<p class="normal" id="ii.i-p3">If the following System do indeed contain the chief and most important 
doctrines of Christianity; and they be, in any good measure, explained and vindicated, 
shewing their consistence and connection with each other, the reader, it is hoped, 
will get some advantage by it. If it should be thought by any that it contains great 
errors and inconsistencies, it is to be wished, for their sake, and for the sake 
of truth, that they would not confidently rest in their conclusion, or drop the 
subject, till they are able to fix on a system of truths more consistent, and which 
can be better supported by the scripture, and are more agreeable to sound reason.</p>
<p class="normal" id="ii.i-p4">It is presumed, the author will not be suspected of going through 
the labour of composing the following work with a view of rendering himself popular, 
and obtaining the general applause; or that he has sought to “please men.” The most 
that can be reasonably expected, is, that it may serve to confirm the friends of 
truth in the doctrines contained in the scripture; and enlighten some of those who 
have been in the dark respecting some truths, and have been inconsistent with themselves 
in the doctrines they have espoused: And that it may assist the honest inquirers 
to see what are the leading and most important doctrines of divine revelation; particularly 
those who are candidates for the evangelical ministry.</p>
<p class="normal" id="ii.i-p5">It is not pretended that every doctrine of Christianity is expressly 
mentioned in this System; but that the most important and essential truths are brought 
into view: And of these some are treated more concisely; and others are more particularly 
examined and vindicated, as was judged most convenient and useful. <pb n="5" id="ii.i-Page_5" />Nor 
was it thought necessary, or expedient, to mention all the objections which have 
been made to the doctrines here advanced, as they are sufficiently obviated, by 
establishing the truth, from scripture and reason; and as this would have enlarged 
the work to an undesirable length: Those only are mentioned, by an answer to which, 
the truth is more explained and established.</p>
<p class="normal" id="ii.i-p6">The same sentiments are brought into view, and repeated, in a 
number of instances; which could not well be avoided, in such a work: And it is 
hoped, that such repetitions will not be inconvenient or tedious to the reader.</p>
<p class="normal" id="ii.i-p7">To the most correct and elegant style, the author makes no pretension; 
as this is not his talent. If the words and expressions be not ambiguous, but are 
suited to convey the ideas, designed to be communicated to the mind of the reader, 
with ease and clearness, the chief and most important end of language is answered: 
And it is hoped, that they who are, with proper attention and concern, inquiring 
after the truth, will exercise so much candour, as not to be offended, or slight 
it, though it be not expressed in words and a style, more agreeable to their nice 
and critical taste; and they may observe a number of inaccuracies.</p>
<p class="normal" id="ii.i-p8">This work has been undertaken and prosecuted, under a conviction, 
that a performance of this kind is much wanted; and, if well executed, would be 
very useful, and greatly serve the cause of truth and religion. It is to be wished 
there were a more able hand, disposed to execute it: But as none appeared to do 
it, the author has done his best. Yet he doubts not that there are many defects; 
and is not confident that he has made no mistakes in less important points; while 
he has not the least doubt that the chief and leading doctrines here advanced are 
contained in the Bible, and are important <pb n="6" id="ii.i-Page_6" />and everlasting truths: And 
that all those sentiments, and schemes of doctrine and religion, which are wholly 
inconsistent with these, and contrary to them, are not consistent with the Bible, 
or with one another; and, if followed in their just consequences, will lead to universal 
scepticism, and, which is the same indeed, to the horrible darkness of atheism itself.</p>
<p class="normal" id="ii.i-p9">The truth is great, and has omnipotence to support it; and therefore 
will prevail: And all erroneous doctrines, and false religion, will be utterly abolished. 
And there is no reason to doubt, that light wall so increase in the church, and 
men will be raised up, who will make such advances in opening the scripture, and 
in the knowledge of divine truth; that what is now done and written, will be so 
far superseded, as to appear imperfect and inconsiderable, compared with that superior 
light, with which the church will then be blessed. Nevertheless, if publishing that 
to which we have <i>now</i> attained, may be a mean of making such advances, and 
a proper and necessary step to it, the labour and expense of doing it, will be abundantly 
compensated.</p>
<p class="normal" id="ii.i-p10"><i>Newport, August</i> 20, 1792.</p>

<pb n="7" id="ii.i-Page_7" />

</div2>

<div2 title="Contents." prev="ii.i" next="iii" id="ii.ii">
<h2 id="ii.ii-p0.1">CONTENTS.</h2>
<table style="width:90%; margin-top:9pt; font-size:medium" id="ii.ii-p0.2">
	<colgroup id="ii.ii-p0.3">
		<col style="width:90%; vertical-align:top" id="ii.ii-p0.4" />
		<col style="width:10%; text-align:right; vertical-align:bottom" id="ii.ii-p0.5" />
	</colgroup>
	<tr id="ii.ii-p0.6">
		<td colspan="2" id="ii.ii-p0.7">
		<h2 id="ii.ii-p0.8">PART I.</h2>
		</td>
	</tr>
	<tr id="ii.ii-p0.9">
		<td colspan="2" style="text-align:right; font-size:80%" id="ii.ii-p0.10">Page</td>
	</tr>
	<tr id="ii.ii-p0.11">
		<td id="ii.ii-p0.12">
		<p class="index1" id="ii.ii-p1">CHAPTER I. Concerning Divine Revelation</p>
		</td>
		<td id="ii.ii-p1.1">9</td>
	</tr>
	<tr id="ii.ii-p1.2">
		<td id="ii.ii-p1.3">
		<p class="index1" id="ii.ii-p2">CHAP. II. On the Being and Perfections of God</p>
		</td>
		<td id="ii.ii-p2.1">39</td>
	</tr>
	<tr id="ii.ii-p2.2">
		<td id="ii.ii-p2.3">
		<p class="index1" id="ii.ii-p3">CHAP. III. On the Unity of God and the Trinity</p>
		</td>
		<td id="ii.ii-p3.1">76</td>
	</tr>
	<tr id="ii.ii-p3.2">
		<td id="ii.ii-p3.3">
		<p class="index1" id="ii.ii-p4">CHAP. IV. On the Decrees of God</p>
		</td>
		<td id="ii.ii-p4.1">84</td>
	</tr>
	<tr id="ii.ii-p4.2">
		<td id="ii.ii-p4.3">
		<p class="index1" id="ii.ii-p5">CHAP. V. Concerning the Creation of the World, and of 
		Man in particular</p>
		</td>
		<td id="ii.ii-p5.1">186</td>
	</tr>
	<tr id="ii.ii-p5.2">
		<td id="ii.ii-p5.3">
		<p class="index1" id="ii.ii-p6">CHAP. VI. Concerning Divine Providence in general</p>
		</td>
		<td id="ii.ii-p6.1">202</td>
	</tr>
	<tr id="ii.ii-p6.2">
		<td id="ii.ii-p6.3">
		<p class="index1" id="ii.ii-p7">CHAP. VII. Concerning the Providence of God as it respects 
		Moral Agents</p>
		</td>
		<td id="ii.ii-p7.1">208</td>
	</tr>
	<tr id="ii.ii-p7.2">
		<td id="ii.ii-p7.3">
		<p class="index1" id="ii.ii-p8">SECT. I. On the Providence of God as it respects the Angels</p>
		</td>
		<td id="ii.ii-p8.1"><i>ib</i>.</td>
	</tr>
	<tr id="ii.ii-p8.2">
		<td id="ii.ii-p8.3">
		<p class="index1" id="ii.ii-p9">SECT. II. On the Providence of God as it respects Man 
		in a state of Innocency</p>
		</td>
		<td id="ii.ii-p9.1">217</td>
	</tr>
	<tr id="ii.ii-p9.2">
		<td id="ii.ii-p9.3">
		<p class="index1" id="ii.ii-p10">CHAP. VIII. On the Apostasy of Man, and the evil Consequences 
		of it.</p>
		</td>
		<td id="ii.ii-p10.1">254</td>
	</tr>
	<tr id="ii.ii-p10.2">
		<td colspan="2" id="ii.ii-p10.3">
		<h2 id="ii.ii-p10.4">PART II.</h2>
		</td>
	</tr>
	<tr id="ii.ii-p10.5">
		<td id="ii.ii-p10.6">
		<p class="index1" id="ii.ii-p11">CHAP. I. Containing General Observations on the Redemption 
		of Man</p>
		</td>
		<td id="ii.ii-p11.1">303</td>
	</tr>
	<tr id="ii.ii-p11.2">
		<td id="ii.ii-p11.3">
		<p class="index1" id="ii.ii-p12">CHAP. II. Concerning the Person and Character of the Redeemer</p>
		</td>
		<td id="ii.ii-p12.1">326</td>
	</tr>
	<tr id="ii.ii-p12.2">
		<td id="ii.ii-p12.3">
		<p class="index1" id="ii.ii-p13">CHAP. III. Concerning the Design and Work of the Redeemer</p>
		</td>
		<td id="ii.ii-p13.1">393</td>
	</tr>
	<tr id="ii.ii-p13.2">
		<td id="ii.ii-p13.3"><pb n="8" id="ii.ii-Page_8" />
		<p class="index1" id="ii.ii-p14">CHAP. IV. On the Application of Redemption</p>
		</td>
		<td id="ii.ii-p14.1">447</td>
	</tr>
	<tr id="ii.ii-p14.2">
		<td id="ii.ii-p14.3">
		<p class="index1" id="ii.ii-p15">SECT. I. On the Application of Redemption in general</p>
		</td>
		<td id="ii.ii-p15.1"><i>ib</i>.</td>
	</tr>
	<tr id="ii.ii-p15.2">
		<td id="ii.ii-p15.3">
		<p class="index1" id="ii.ii-p16">SECT. II. On Regeneration</p>
		</td>
		<td id="ii.ii-p16.1">451</td>
	</tr>
	<tr id="ii.ii-p16.2">
		<td id="ii.ii-p16.3">
		<p class="index1" id="ii.ii-p17">SECT. III. On Conversion</p>
		</td>
		<td id="ii.ii-p17.1">461</td>
	</tr>
	<tr id="ii.ii-p17.2">
		<td id="ii.ii-p17.3">
		<p class="index1" id="ii.ii-p18">SECT IV. On Disinterested Affection</p>
		</td>
		<td id="ii.ii-p18.1">465</td>
	</tr>
	<tr id="ii.ii-p18.2">
		<td id="ii.ii-p18.3">
		<p class="index1" id="ii.ii-p19">SECT V. Concerning Divine Illumination</p>
		</td>
		<td id="ii.ii-p19.1">491</td>
	</tr>
</table>

<pb n="9" id="ii.ii-Page_9" />
</div2></div1>

<div1 title="System of Doctrines. Part I." prev="ii.ii" next="iii.i" id="iii">


<h2 id="iii-p0.1">SYSTEM OF DOCTRINES.</h2>
<hr style="width:30%; color:black; margin-top:24pt; margin-bottom:24pt" />
<h2 id="iii-p0.3">PART I.</h2>
<hr style="width:20%; color:black; margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt" />

<div2 title="Chapter I. Concerning Divine Revelation." prev="iii" next="iii.ii" id="iii.i">

<h2 id="iii.i-p0.1">CHAP. I.</h2>
<h3 id="iii.i-p0.2">CONCERNING DIVINE REVELATION.</h3>
<p class="normal" id="iii.i-p1">IT is evident from reason, fact and experience, that mankind stand 
in need of a revelation from God, in order to know what God is—what is their own 
true state and moral character—whether he be reconcileable to them, who have rebelled 
against him—and if he be, what is the method he has appointed, in which he will 
be reconciled; and what man must be and do, in order to find acceptance in his sight: 
Wherein true happiness consists—whether there be another state—what are the favours 
he will grant in a future state, to those who serve and please him in this life—what 
are his grand designs in creating and governing the world, &amp;c. The ignorance and 
uncertainty, with respect to these most important points, in which all men have 
been and still are, who have enjoyed no such revelation, is a constant, striking 
evidence of this.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.i-p2">There are, indeed, those who refuse to admit this evidence; and 
insist that human reason alone, unassisted by any revelation, except what is made 
in the works of creation and providence, is sufficient to investigate every necessary 
and important truth; and therefore think themselves authorized to reject and despise 
every other <pb n="10" id="iii.i-Page_10" />revelation that pretends to come from God, as the contrivance 
and production of designing, or weak, deluded men. But while they entertain so high 
an opinion of human reason, and especially their own, in the face of the glaring 
evidence from fact and experiment, just now mentioned, they have produced an incontestible 
evidence of their own sad mistake; for upon examination, the writings of the deists 
are found to contain numerous contradictions to each other, on points of the highest 
moment; and most of them have embraced for truth, many tenets most unreasonable 
and absurd. Thus, when they have renounced revelation, and boasted of their own 
reason, and relied upon that, as a sufficient and infallible guide, they have all, 
or most of them, run into darkness and delusion. And at the same time, there is 
abundant evidence, that all the real light and knowledge they appear to have in 
divine things, which they attribute to the unassisted exercise of their own reason, 
and which is more than the benighted heathen have, originated from that very revelation, 
which they discard and despise. With great propriety therefore they have been compared 
to a man who is in a room, illuminated by the bright shining of a candle, and thereby 
is assisted to behold the objects around him distinctly: But being ignorant of the 
assistance which he has from the candle, imagines he discerns those objects by the 
strength of his own sight; and therefore despises and endeavours to extinguish that 
light, which, if withdrawn, would leave him wholly in the dark.<note n="1" id="iii.i-p2.1"><p class="normal" id="iii.i-p3">See Leland’s 
View of the Deistical Writers. And Clarke on revealed religion. Proposition vii.</p></note> 
Besides, there is this farther evidence against them, and in favour of the revelation 
which they renounce, viz. It does not appear, that by all their writings and attempts, 
they have made any reformation in the morals of men, or that so much as one man 
has been reclaimed from a vicious course of life, and become sober, humble, benevolent, 
pious and devout, by being made a convert to them: But, on the contrary, most, if 
not all their disciples, are of a character directly the reverse of this; and they 
are most admired by men of vicious character, or who at least are evidently without <pb n="11" id="iii.i-Page_11" />
those virtues which are essential to constitute a truly religious man.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.i-p4">Moreover, if the revelation they discard represents men to be 
in such a state of depravity and vicious blindness, as to be disposed to shut their 
eyes against the clearest light, and to treat it as these men in fact do treat the 
Bible; and foretells this same treatment and conduct of theirs, as it certainly 
does; while they are thus slighting and rejecting it, they are really giving a strong 
evidence of its divine original.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.i-p5">But, to return: The usefulness and necessity of such a revelation 
is abundantly evident from fact, and has been implicitly or expressly acknowledged 
by many of the most wise and inquisitive among the heathen.<note n="2" id="iii.i-p5.1"><p class="normal" id="iii.i-p6">See Dr. Clarke 
on the truth and certainty of the christian revelation. Proposition vii.</p></note> 
Hence we may conclude, that God has given one to men: And when we find ourselves 
in possession of a book which has all the marks and evidence that we can reasonably 
expect or desire, that it is indeed from God, and suited to answer all the ends 
of a divine revelation, we shall be very criminal, if we do not receive it with 
gratitude, and improve it to promote all the important purposes for which it is 
given.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.i-p7">Such a revelation we find to be contained in the book called the
<i>Bible</i>, or the holy scriptures. For while all other pretended revelations 
from God, which have been, or now are found among men, are without all proper evidence 
of their being such, and carry evident marks of imposture, which has been abundantly 
demonstrated, by those who have examined them: <i>This</i> has stood the test of 
the severest scrutiny both of its friends and enemies, and the more it has been 
examined, the more clearly does it appear, that all the objections which have been 
made against it are futile and groundless; and that there is sufficient and abundant 
evidence, that it is from God, suited to give satisfaction and a well grounded assurance 
of its divine original, to every impartial, honest mind.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.i-p8">The first part of this book was written by Moses, after he had 
given abundant evidence, by a series of astonishing miracles, done in the sight 
of the Egyptians, <pb n="12" id="iii.i-Page_12" />and all Israel, that he spake and acted, under the 
influence and direction of the supreme Ruler of the universe, and had sufficiently 
established his character, as a prophet divinely inspired. Moses said he was sent 
by Jehovah, the only true God, the God of Israel, to demand of Pharaoh, the king 
of Egypt, to let his people go out from under his oppressive hand; and foretold 
that if he refused to do it, God would slay his first born son. Pharaoh said he 
knew not who Jehovah was, and bid defiance to him, declaring he would pay no regard 
to his demand. This gave opportunity for an open trial and decision, whether Jehovah, 
the God of Israel, was the true God, or the gods of Pharaoh and the Egyptians. The 
priests and the magicians of Egypt were collected, and entered the dispute with 
Moses. They wrought several miracles, in imitation of those which Moses did in the 
name of the God of Israel; but there was an evident, decided superiority in those 
wrought by Jehovah. And the contest went on, till at length they were not able to 
stand before Moses, and confessed publicly that Jehovah was God, and superior to 
theirs. Moses went on doing wonders, in the sight of all Egypt, and inflicting various 
successive judgments on Pharaoh, and on the Egyptians; at the same time particularly 
foretelling the miraculous chastisement which Jehovah had revealed to him he would 
inflict. At length, Moses informed Pharaoh, that if he should still persist in refusing 
to let Israel go out of Egypt, Jehovah had said to him, that he would slay all the 
first born in Egypt; and this was foretold to all Israel; which accordingly came 
to pass: And the Egyptians were made to fear and tremble before the God of Israel, 
and entreated his people to pray to him for them, acknowledging he was the supreme 
God. Thus Israel went out of Egypt, as Jehovah had promised they should, and were 
led through the Red Sea, the waters dividing to make them a way, at the direction 
and command of their God; while Pharaoh and the Egyptians, who were so hardy as 
to follow them, were all drowned in the waters. Thus Jehovah publicly triumphed 
over all the gods of Egypt, and executed judgment upon them; and by the fullest 
and most incontestible evidence established <pb n="13" id="iii.i-Page_13" />his character as the only 
true God. The people of Israel felt, and solemnly acknowledged this, at the Red 
Sea; and they were led on by the hand of Moses, attended with a constant course 
of miracles, unto Mount Sinai. On that Mount, God appeared in a manner suited to 
manifest his presence and awful glorious majesty, and excite their utmost attention, 
fear and reverence; and then, from the top of the mountain, out of the fire, with 
a voice that could be distinctly heard by all that vast multitude, consisting of 
at least three millions of people, he spake the ten commandments, and added no more. 
They were after wards written on two tables of stone, by the finger of God; which 
was most probably the first writing by letters in this world:<note n="3" id="iii.i-p8.1"><p class="normal" id="iii.i-p9">See Dr Winder’s 
history of the rise, progress, declension and revival of knowledge, chiefly religious.</p></note> 
And Moses, being taught of God to read it, and so how to write, was directed and 
inspired by God to write the history of the creation of the world, and the events 
which had taken place since; and of mankind, so far as was necessary these things 
should be recorded and known; and, more particularly, the history of the origin 
of the Hebrews, and the events of divine providence respecting them. As this is 
the first, and oldest, so it is the only authentic history of the creation of the 
world, and of mankind, from the beginning to that time, which is an era of about 
two thousand five hundred years. Moses also wrote a code of laws for that people, 
which he said were dictated to him by God, containing many promises and threatenings, 
together with a number of typical institutions, which were shadows of things to 
come. And there are many predictions in his writings, which have already come to 
pass; especially that God would raise up unto them that great prophet, the Messiah, 
of whom he himself was a type; and if they would not hear him, they should be destroyed.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.i-p10">God having thus established his character, as the only true God, 
by abundant and most clear evidence; and magnified Moses in the sight of the Egyptians 
and all Israel, as his servant and prophet, directed and inspired by him both to 
do, and to say, all that he did and said, in the name of Jehovah; he forbid them 
to hearken <pb n="14" id="iii.i-Page_14" />to a prophet, or any other person, who should arise and 
do wonders and miracles, not in the name of Jehovah, but of some other god, with 
a view to draw them away from obedience to the God of Israel, to worship and serve 
other gods. And every one who will attentively consider the subject, must at once 
see both the reasonableness of this injunction, and the wisdom and goodness of God 
in laying a proper foundation for it, and then giving it by Moses to Israel. For 
Jehovah having given all the evidence that could be reasonably expected or desired, 
by a series of public incontestible miracles, appearances, words and works, that 
he was the only true God; which all Israel had, under the fullest and most rational 
conviction, acknowledged, over and over again, and under this conviction, solemnly 
given themselves up to him, as their God; and promised to renounce all other gods, 
and cleave to, and obey Jehovah alone, as their God: It became them never from that 
time to call in question what had been made so abundantly evident, but with the 
greatest assurance, and the most sincere abhorrence, reject every thing which was 
evidently contrary to the light and revelation they had received; and not pay the 
least regard to any wonders and miracles, pretended to be done, or really wrought, 
to prove that Jehovah was not the only true God, and in favour of other gods.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.i-p11">These things have been observed, to show with what abundant evidence 
and assurance the church of Israel received the writings of Moses, as divine oracles, 
the infallible dictates of Heaven, which he was inspired to reveal and communicate; 
while it is at the same time acknowledged there are many other things which have 
not been here brought into view, which serve to strengthen this evidence, and show 
that to make any other supposition, and not to admit these writings as the oracles 
of Heaven, is most absurd, shutting the eyes against the most glaring light, and 
doing violence to every principle of reason.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.i-p12">After Moses, other prophets and inspired men were raised up to 
write the history of that nation; to declare the will of God, in reproving, directing 
and exhorting; and adding threatenings and promises, to deter them from <pb n="15" id="iii.i-Page_15" />
rebellion against Jehovah, and excite them to obey him. Whose writings also contain 
innumerable predictions of things to come, many of which are already come to pass; 
those in particular which foretold the coming of the Messiah, his incarnation, death, 
resurrection, exaltation and reign: and the events that should attend his coming 
with regard both to Jews and Gentiles, &amp;c. &amp;c. And in these writings there is a 
constant reference to the things contained in the writings of Moses, the wonders 
wrought by his hand, when they were delivered from a state of bondage in Egypt, 
&amp;c. and to the institutions and laws, which by him were given to Israel: And at 
the same time there is a perfect consistence and harmony, between these writings 
and those of Moses.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.i-p13">The last prophet, whose writings we have, lived about four hundred 
years before Christ; so that the sacred writings which were given to the church 
of Israel, and which they received as divine oracles, and have carefully kept and 
preserved, not only to the time of the incarnation of Christ, but even down to this 
day, were written at different times, by different men, through the space of above 
a thousand years, from Moses the first, to Malachi, the last writer. And yet they 
all agree; and the latter constantly refer to the writings of Moses, and what is 
contained in them; and therefore they mutually strengthen the evidence, that they 
all wrote by inspiration, as most of them declared they did. And Malachi concludes 
with foretelling the coming of Christ, and directing the church of Israel to attend 
to the laws and institutions of Moses, and obey them, until Christ should come; 
and to expect no more divine revelation, till that time; plainly intimating, that 
then some further revelations from God should be given to the church.<note n="4" id="iii.i-p13.1"><p class="normal" id="iii.i-p14"><scripRef id="iii.i-p14.1" passage="Mal. iv. 4" parsed="|Mal|4|4|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Mal.4.4">Mal. 
iv. 4</scripRef>, <scripRef passage="Mal 4:5" id="iii.i-p14.2" parsed="|Mal|4|5|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Mal.4.5">5</scripRef>.</p></note> Thus the standing, written revelation, given lo the Jewish church, 
was finished; and they were commanded not to attempt to make, or expect any addition 
to it, till the days of the Messiah.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.i-p15">Should it be said, that perhaps all these writings were forged 
by some wicked, designing man, or set of men, and that the facts and miracles therein 
related never did take place, nor was Moses, or any other man, inspired of God to 
write these things; but they were imposed <pb n="16" id="iii.i-Page_16" />upon that nation, and they 
were made to believe that which never had any reality: Such a supposition will appear 
most unreasonable, and even impossible, on the least reflection. When, and how, 
could this be done? How could that nation, even all of them, old and young, learned 
and unlearned, at any time be made to believe that all these things related in the 
writings of Moses, concerned them, and which he said took place publicly, and that 
they were seen and acknowledged by the whole nation; and that all those rites and 
laws had been received in a miraculous way from Jehovah, by their ancestors, and 
handed down, and practised from generation to generation, if there was no truth 
in all this; but they were all novo invented, and they never had any existence, 
or were heard of before, by any of them? This is perfectly incredible, and absolutely 
impossible. And it is equally incredible, that a whole nation should at any time 
receive such writings, and pretend they were all genuine and true, and handed down 
from their fathers, when at the same time they knew there was no truth in it, but 
was real imposture and delusion. Who can believe, that any nation or people under 
heaven, could ever be brought to do this; and receive and practise all those burdensome 
rites and ceremonies, and hand them down to their children as the institutions of 
Heaven, when they knew it was all a cheat? And this will appear yet more incredible, 
if possible, when we observe, that these writings give no agreeable, flattering 
idea of that nation, as a wise, excellent, and honourable people; but contrary to 
this, they are represented as a very stupid, ungrateful, rebellious people, always 
disposed to abuse and revolt from their God, and violate the most sacred obligations 
and solemn vows, by which they were constantly incurring the displeasure of Jehovah; 
and were severely punished, from time to time, for their horrid impiety, and most 
stupid idolatry, and their obstinate perseverance in shameful unrighteousness and 
cruelty towards each other. If a people could forge and receive a history of themselves 
as a nation, in which there was no truth; or if it were contrived and formed by 
any set of men, or by any one man among them, with a design to impose it on the 
nation, to be received by them <pb n="17" id="iii.i-Page_17" />as genuine; we may be sure it would 
be written in favour of that nation, and so as to flatter their selfishness, pride, 
and vanity, instead of representing them, as these writings do that nation, in a 
disagreeable, shameful, odious light.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.i-p16">Besides, these writings have no marks, not the least appearance 
of imposture and forgery, when most critically examined; but all appearance that 
can be desired, that they are genuine, and were written at the different times, 
and in the different circumstances, in which they are said to have been written, 
and by those different men: Whereas, if they were a forgery, and not written by 
inspiration, it cannot be supposed possible, they should carry all those marks of 
genuineness, and none of the contrary.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.i-p17">Moreover, they contain a system of truths, and point out and enjoin 
commands and duties to God and our neighbour, which bespeak their divine original, 
and are worthy to be revealed by God; and which no ungodly, selfish, designing impostor, 
and such these writers must be, if they wrote not by inspiration, would ever think 
of, and much less be disposed to publish and enjoin.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.i-p18">The promised Messiah at length made his appearance in the world, 
even at the very time in which it was foretold he should come! the way for his coming 
having been prepared by his harbinger, as was particularly predicted by Isaiah; 
and by Malachi, in the last words of the Old Testament.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.i-p19">It having been abundantly proved, as has been ob» served and shown, 
that Jehovah, the God of Israel, was the only true God, and that the writings in 
their hands were given by divine inspiration, in which the coming of the Messiah 
and his future kingdom were foretold, and particularly described; all that was now 
necessary, in order to his being on good ground received as king of the church, 
was to give proper evidence that he was the very person, the promised Saviour of 
the world. This was done not only by his appearing at the time, and in the character 
and circumstances, which were foretold by the prophets; but by working a series 
of miracles, done in a public manner: And by his predicting <pb n="18" id="iii.i-Page_18" />many things, 
which soon came to pass, especially his own death, and the particular circumstances 
of it; and that he would rise again on the third day. He was accordingly put to 
death, which his enemies as well as friends confess; and if he did rise again, as 
he said he would, the evidence that he was the Messiah, the same Jehovah who was 
the God of Israel, would be complete, and none could reasonably desire more.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.i-p20">That he did rise on the third day; and when he had continued on 
earth above forty days, conversing with his disciples and friends, and giving them 
instructions and commands, left the world and ascended to heaven, there were a competent 
number of chosen witnesses, who declared they were eye and ear witnesses of this; 
and that they had the most satisfactory, full and abundant evidence of it. And farther, 
to prove the truth of it, they had power to work innumerable miracles in the name 
of Jesus of Nazareth, as a testimony that he was alive, and consequently the Son 
of God, and Saviour of the world. And they gave up all their worldly interest in 
this cause; and subjected themselves to poverty, hatred and reproach of men; and 
to various hardships and cruel sufferings, and even to death, in bearing witness 
to this truth, and those that are implied in it, and preaching the gospel; which 
was attended by an invisible mighty power, purifying and renewing the hearts of 
multitudes, and leading them to renounce their former delusions and wicked ways, 
and to believe in Christ, and obey him; who became so many witnesses of the truth 
and power of Christianity.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.i-p21">A history of these things was written by those who had the most 
certain knowledge of them, and intimate acquaintance with them, giving an account 
of the birth, life, death and resurrection of Christ; and of the doctrines which 
he taught, and the instructions and commands he gave, and the miracles which were 
wrought by him, &amp;c. &amp;c. Also, a history was written of what took place for a number 
of years after the ascension of Christ to heaven; the promised gift of his Spirit 
to the apostles and others, whereby they were enabled to speak different languages, 
and to work miracles: Their bearing testimony for Christ, and preaching <pb n="19" id="iii.i-Page_19" />
with great success, not only to the Jews, but to the Gentile nations, and erecting 
churches in many parts of the world, Sec. This history of Christ and his apostles 
is written in a manner remarkably different from that of any other history written 
by men not inspired. It is simple, plain and concise, consisting only in the most 
intelligible narration of facts, of what was said and done, without justifying or 
condemning any person; not giving the least encomium, or bestowing any praise on 
Christ himself, or any of his friends, nor saying a word in their favour; not reproaching 
or condemning their enemies, or any person, or speaking against them: but confining 
themselves to a plain history of simple facts, without any comments of their own, 
against any one, or in favour of him. This, by the way, is a striking evidence, 
among others innumerable, that these writings, “came not by the will of man;” but 
were composed under the direction and superintendency of the Holy Ghost, the authors 
being inspired and moved by him.<note n="5" id="iii.i-p21.1"><p class="normal" id="iii.i-p22">“It is remarkable, that through the whole 
of their histories, the evangelists have not passed one encomium upon Jesus, or 
upon any of his friends: nor thrown out one reflection against his enemies; though 
much of both kinds might have been, and no doubt would have been done by them, had 
they been governed either by a spirit of imposture, or enthusiasm. Christ’s life 
is not praised in the gospels; his death is not lamented; his friends are not commended; 
his enemies are not reproached, nor even blamed; but every thing is told, naked 
and unadorned, just as it took place; and all who read are left to judge, and make 
reflections for themselves. A manner of writing which the historians never would 
have fallen into, had not their minds been under the guidance of the most sober 
reason, and deeply impressed with the dignity, importance and truth of their subject.”—<i>Macknight’s 
Harmony of the Gospels</i>.</p></note></p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.i-p23">We have also the writings of several of the apostles of Christ, 
containing a number of letters, which they wrote to churches, and to some particular 
persons, in which the doctrines and duties of Christianity, and the institutions 
and laws of Christ, are more particularly explained and inculcated. And last of 
all, there is a book, called “The revelation of Jesus Christ, which he sent and 
signified by his angel unto his servant John.” This the apostle John w rote in his 
advanced age, after the destruction of Jerusalem by the Romans, when he was suffering 
for the cause of Christ, being banished to a desolate island, after his character 
had been long established <pb n="20" id="iii.i-Page_20" />as an apostle of Christ, by miracles, and 
a holy life. He says, he received this revelation from Christ, and was by him directed 
to write it, just as he here has done. It contains, among other things, a representation 
of the state of the church, and the great events that should take place respecting 
it, from that time to the end of the world, and of its perfect and glorious state 
from that period forever and ever; and of the endless punishment of all her implacable 
enemies. And many of the predictions in this book have been already accomplished: 
others are daily fulfilling before our eyes, which is a constant miracle, of the 
most indisputable kind, evidencing the divine original of this prophecy; and that 
the things therein foretold, which are not yet come to pass, will all be accomplished 
in their season.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.i-p24">And as the divine inspired writings, given to the Jewish church, 
conclude with an intimation that they should have nothing more of this kind, till 
the promised Messiah did come, and a command carefully to keep and observe what 
they had received; so this book concludes with a declaration, that there should 
be no addition to divinely inspired writings, given to the christian church; and 
therefore mankind must look for no more; but are commanded carefully to observe 
and obey what was then revealed, without adding any thing to it, or taking from 
it, until Christ shall come to judgment.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.i-p25">God having thus completed a revelation containing every thing 
he saw necessary and proper, to make it a sufficient, perfect, and unerring rule 
for his church to the end of the world; and every way adapted to answer all the 
desired ends of a divine revelation; attended with all the evidence that can be 
reasonably desired, that it is from God, and the whole that he ever will give; the 
use and end of miracles has of course ceased; and therefore the church is to expect 
no more, or any more prophets inspired to foretel things to come, not already foretold 
in the holy scriptures. And whatever pretences any may make of working miracles, 
and whatever miracles may be really wrought, in support of any pretended truths 
or institutions, or system of religion, the church of Christ has no liberty to pay 
the least regard to them; but ought to renounce all such pretences with <pb n="21" id="iii.i-Page_21" />
abhorrence; and to hearken to them, and regard them in the least, is to renounce 
the Bible, and the God who has given it to his church. Nor have we any warrant to 
pay the least regard to any who pretend to a spirit of prophecy; even though the 
things they foretel, come to pass; but, on the contrary, ought wholly to disregard 
and renounce such pretences, being certain from divine revelation, that they are 
not from God, and cannot in the least strengthen the evidence of the divine authority 
of the Bible, or of any truth contained in it: but have a contrary tendency: And 
to pay any regard to them is really to slight the Bible, and may give Satan an advantage, 
and opportunity to introduce the most gross and fatal delusions.<note n="6" id="iii.i-p25.1"><p class="normal" id="iii.i-p26">The church 
of Rome claim it as the mark of a true church, to be able to work miracles, and 
assert that this is essential to the true church of Christ, and pretend to have 
this evidence that they are the only true catholic church, viz. that a multitude 
of miracles have been, and still are wrought by them . But this is so far from being 
an evidence of a true church, that their pretending to such a power is an infallible 
mark and evidence that it is a false church; and this is warrant sufficient to condemn 
and renounce it as such, without being at the pains of examining all their pretended 
miracles, to see if they be real miracles or not. If that church could be supported 
and proved to be right, by the holy scriptures, we ought to own it as a true church; 
but if not, a thousand miracles will not prove any thing in its favour; but even 
their pretending to work miracles, and appealing to these, is a demonstration that 
it is not a true church, as this is a slight and rejection of the word of God.</p></note></p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.i-p27">This general view of the holy scriptures, and the observations 
that have been made, are designed to exhibit no inconsiderable part of the evidence 
we have, that they do indeed contain a revelation from God, and may with the greatest 
safety be relied upon as such. But there are many other evidences of this, some 
of which ought to be brought into view, when this subject is considered. And it 
may be proper now to mention a number of arguments to prove that the writings contained 
in the Bible are a revelation from God, in which several things that have been already 
hinted will be included.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.i-p28">I. The series of miracles which have been wrought, as a testimony 
that this revelation is from God, is a standing, undeniable proof of it. These have 
been in some measure brought into view, in the observations above; from which the 
propriety and importance of these miracles, and the end for which they were <pb n="22" id="iii.i-Page_22" />
wrought, appear. That these miracles were really wrought, we have as great evidence 
as the nature of the case will admit; and not the least ground of suspicion and 
doubt; especially when we consider the times and circumstances of them, and their 
apparent design, and the nature and contents of the revelation, the credit of which 
they are designed to establish. These things have been particularly and largely 
considered by many, and therefore are only mentioned here, except the last, which 
will be attended to in the sequel.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.i-p29">II. The numerous prophecies which are contained in the Bible, 
with their exact accomplishment, are a standing, clear evidence, that it is a revelation 
from God. The certain independent foreknowledge of future events, or of any thing 
to come, all will grant, belongs to the true God alone. Therefore we find Jehovah 
challenging this as his own prerogative; and his declaring what will be, and bringing 
it to pass accordingly, is asserted to be a demonstration that it is the true God 
who speaks. And he says, that he who can do this, does prove himself to be God. 
“Produce your cause, saith the Lord; bring forth your strong reasons, saith the 
king of Jacob. Let them bring them forth, and shew what shall happen.—Shew the things 
that are to come hereafter, that we may know that ye are gods.” “I, even I am the 
Lord, and beside me there is no Saviour. I have <i>declared</i>, and have saved,
<i>and I have shewed</i>, when there was no strange god among you: Therefore, ye 
are my witnesses, saith the Lord, that I am God.” When Jehovah brought Israel out 
of Egypt, he demonstrated that he was the only true God, and they renounced all 
other gods; then he foretold what would befall them, both in promises and threatenings, 
and a great number of predictions, which had actually come to pass in their sight: 
Therefore they were his witnesses, as they were witnesses of this fact, which was 
sufficient to support his character, as the only true God, in opposition to all 
other pretended gods. Jehovah tells them that one end of his thus foretelling events, 
and then bringing them to pass, was to give them an undeniable proof that he was 
the true God, who spoke to them by Moses, &amp;c. and leave them inexcusable, if they 
should acknowledge any other <pb n="23" id="iii.i-Page_23" />God. “I have declared the former things 
from the beginning; and they went forth out of my mouth, and I shewed them; I did 
them suddenly, and they came to pass. Because I knew that thou art obstinate, and 
thy neck is an iron sinew, and thy brow brass; I have even from the beginning declared 
it to thee: Before it came to pass, I shewed it thee, lest thou shouldest say mine 
idol hath done them, and my graven image, and my molten image, hath commanded them.”<note n="7" id="iii.i-p29.1"><p class="normal" id="iii.i-p30">
<scripRef id="iii.i-p30.1" passage="Isaiah xlviii. 3" parsed="|Isa|48|3|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Isa.48.3">Isaiah xlviii. 3</scripRef>, <scripRef passage="Isaiah 48:4" id="iii.i-p30.2" parsed="|Isa|48|4|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Isa.48.4">4</scripRef>, <scripRef passage="Isaiah 48:5" id="iii.i-p30.3" parsed="|Isa|48|5|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Isa.48.5">5</scripRef>.</p></note></p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.i-p31">Though they had in many other ways good evidence that he was the 
true God, in whose name Moses spake and acted; yet God, knowing their evil disposition, 
and how prone they were to unbelief, and to turn away from him to other gods, in 
his great condescension and goodness, took care to give and heap up more abundant 
standing evidence that they had indeed the oracles of the true God, who was the 
God of Israel, by foretelling innumerable events, and then bringing them to pass 
before their eyes. When Moses wrought the numerous signs and wonders in Egypt, he 
foretold these events before they took place: And so most of the miracles wrought 
by the hand of Moses at the Red Sea, and in the wilderness, were foretold immediately 
before they took place: And also many things of which we have an account in the 
books of Joshua, Judges, and the two books of Samuel, &amp;c. To such predictions as 
these, which were brought to pass immediately, the above cited words seem to have 
particular reference: God says, “They went forth out of my mouth, and I shewed them; 
I did them suddenly, and they came to pass.” In this way they had not only the evidence 
which the miracles themselves gave of the truth, in favour of which they were wrought; 
but the prediction and the immediate accomplishment, was a yet farther evidence 
that he who wrought the miracle spoke and acted under the influence, and according 
to the dictates of the omniscient God. In this way were most of the miracles wrought 
by Christ and his apostles.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.i-p32">But there are almost innumerable prophecies in the Bible which 
foretel things to come, that were not to take place immediately; but a long time, 
and numbers of <pb n="24" id="iii.i-Page_24" />them many ages after the predictions were published. 
Many predictions of this kind are contained in the writings of Moses, which foretel 
a multitude of events respecting that nation, which have been exactly fulfilled. 
And indeed great part of the religious institutions and worship enjoined in the 
Mosaic ritual, are so many prophecies of what should take place in the person, character, 
and kingdom of Christ, as they are appointed types and shadows of these things, 
and have been exactly fulfilled in them. This is particularly attended to and illustrated 
in the Epistle to the Hebrews. This is a strong argument that these institutions 
and laws, were made by the only true God, who knows what is to come, even all his 
own designs, and works that are future.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.i-p33">A great part of the writings of Moses and the prophets are prophecies 
that respect Christ, his incarnation, his sufferings, and the glory that should 
follow in the salvation of men, and his kingdom. Jn these writings it is foretold 
that he should l3e the seed of Abraham by Isaac, that he should be of the tribe 
of Judah, and the family of David: Should be born of a virgin, in the town of Bethlehem; 
that he should be poor and despised, rejected, hated and put to death by the Jews 
and Gentiles, joining together to perpetrate this horrid deed. The particular time 
of his appearance and death is pointed out; and a great number of particulars relating 
to his life, death and resurrection are foretold; all which have been exactly fulfilled. 
They also foretel the rejection of the Jews, and calling of the Gentiles to be the 
people of God, and share in the blessings of Christ’s kingdom; and speak much of 
the extent and glory of his kingdom, and particularly foretel that it should rise, 
prevail, and fill the world after the ruin of the Roman monarchy, and shall continue 
forever. Christ and his apostles did constantly appeal to these prophecies, as most 
plainly, and with die greatest exactness predicting what took place in Jesus of 
Nazareth. Christ himself, after his death .aid resurrection, addresses those who 
were wholly at a loss what to think of these things, in the following words; “O, 
fools, and slow of heart, to believe all that the prophets have spoken! Ought not 
Christ to have suffered these things, and to enter into <pb n="25" id="iii.i-Page_25" />his glory? 
And beginning at Moses and all the prophets, he expounded unto them, in all the 
scriptures, the things concerning himself.” The apostle Peter publicly appeals to 
them, and says, “God hath spoken of these things by the mouth of all the prophets, 
since the world began. For Moses truly said unto the fathers, a prophet shall the 
Lord your God raise up unto you, of your brethren, like unto me. And it shall come 
to pass, that every soul which will not hear that prophet, shall be destroyed from 
among the people. Yea, and all the prophets from Samuel, and those that follow after, 
as many as have spoken, have likewise foretold of these days.” And St. Paul declares, 
that in bearing testimony to the truth of Christianity, and preaching the gospel, 
he asserted “no other things than those which the prophets and Moses did say should 
come.” And with this argument, taken from the fulfilment of prophecies in Jesus 
of Nazareth, the first preachers of the gospel often put to silence, and confounded 
the opposing Jews, and convinced many, that Jesus was the Christ.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.i-p34">The writings of the New Testament contain many predictions. Christ 
particularly foretold his death, and his resurrection on the third day after—Who 
should betray him, and who should deny him—The gift of the Spirit to the apostles 
in his miraculous powers—What treatment they should receive from the Jews—What support 
they should have; and what should be their success. He in a very particular manner 
foretold the calamities that should come on the nation of the Jews, and the destruction 
of Jerusalem and the temple; and said this should come to pass before all that generation 
did go off the stage of life. And though to human appearance, these events were 
not merely improbable, but even impossible; yet they all came to pass exactly agreeable 
to the prediction.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.i-p35">But passing over many other instances of prophecy, both of Christ 
and his apostles, and others in the primitive church, and the particular fulfilment 
of their predictions, that remarkable one of St. Paul,<note n="8" id="iii.i-p35.1"><p class="normal" id="iii.i-p36"><scripRef passage="2Thes 2:3-12" id="iii.i-p36.1" parsed="|2Thess|2|3|2|12" osisRef="Bible:2Thess.2.3-2Thess.2.12">2 
Thes. chap. ii.</scripRef></p></note> of the grand apostasy in the christian church, by the 
rise and reign of <pb n="26" id="iii.i-Page_26" />one whom he calls the <i>man of sin</i> and <i>wicked 
one</i>; by which the Pope and the false church of Rome are exactly described, together 
with his final overthrow and destruction, is worthy of particular attention. This 
was then the most incredible and unlikely to come to pass of almost any event whatsoever: 
That the Emperor of Rome should be taken out of the way, to give opportunity for 
this apostasy, and the exaltation of this man of sin in the church of Christ, &amp;c. 
But this is all come to pass. And this apostasy in the church, with all its circumstances 
and attendants, together with the general state of the church, and of the world 
down to the day of judgment, are yet more particularly and fully foretold in the 
revelation which Jesus Christ gave to the apostle John after his ascension. In this 
prophecy many things are foretold, which were then future, and which have already 
come to pass; and others are daily fulfilling in the sight of all who have wisdom 
to observe and discern; from which there is a standing, and increasing, public evidence 
of the truth of the christian religion, sufficient to silence and convince all the 
opposers of Christianity, would they honestly attend to the voice of reason.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.i-p37">From the view we have now taken of the prophecies, contained in 
the Bible, and their fulfilment, the following particulars may be observed.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.i-p38">1. Those predictions which have been exactly fulfilled are numerous, 
and made at different times, and by different persons; and most of them were made 
publicly; and the events foretold are many of them of a public nature, and lie open 
to the examination of all. Therefore if they were not given by the omniscient God, 
it cannot be supposed the events would in so many instances answer to the predictions 
so exactly, and not fail in one, among so many: For this may well be considered 
as impossible.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.i-p39">2. There is all the evidence that can be desired that many of 
these predictions were given long before the events took place, and while there 
was not the least ground from any thing that then appeared, to expect they would 
ever come to pass. Thus, all the prophecies in the Old Testament, which have been 
fulfilled in the days of Christ’s appearance on earth, and of the apostles, and <pb n="27" id="iii.i-Page_27" />
since, were certainly written and published, and in the hands of the Jewish church, 
long before the events took place. And prophecies of those things relating to the 
Pope and the church of Rome, and the kings of the earth who commit fornication with 
her, and join to support her, which have come to pass, and are now taking place 
in the world, were published, long before any of these things took place, or there 
was any appearance or probability that they ever would come to pass. And in many 
instances, all appearances, to human view, were against it.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.i-p40">3. Those prophecies are such, and the times and manner in which 
they are given such, as become an almighty, omniscient, infinitely wise and good 
Being. They are given in an orderly manner, with an apparent good design, and suited 
to answer important ends.—To establish the character of those who spake and wrote 
in his name, as men inspired by God, and prove that he was the omniscient God who 
spoke, and so to be a clear standing evidence that it is a divine revelation, most 
evidently distinguished from all possible deception and imposture—To confirm the 
faith of the friends of God, and direct, support and comfort them, under all dark 
appearances and afflictions, Sec. Sec.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.i-p41">Surely they who would honestly attend to these things and carefully 
consider and examine the prophecies contained in the Bible, with the exact fulfilment 
of so many of them, must be sensible that they afford clear and abundant evidence 
that the writings in this book are from God, as the prophecies found in it could 
not come by the will and contrivance of man; but these holy men of God evidently 
spake as they were moved by the Holy Ghost.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.i-p42">III. The writings in the Old Testament, and those in the New, 
reflect light and evidence on each other, that they are from God.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.i-p43">This appears from what has been observed on the preceding argument 
from prophecy: For the exact fulfilment of so many of the types and express predictions 
in the Old Testament, by the events and things of which we have a history in the 
New, does abundantly establish the credit of those writings as given by divine <pb n="28" id="iii.i-Page_28" />
inspiration. And, at the same time, they prove the divine original of Christianity; 
and therefore that the writings in the New Testament are from God. And the perfect 
consistence and harmony between the writings of the Old Testament, and those of 
the New, does also afford a striking argument of the divine original of each of 
them. Moreover, Christ and his apostles constantly appeal to the writings of Moses 
and the prophets, the scriptures, as of divine authority, and the oracles of God. 
This establishes the credit of all those writings as given by inspiration of God, 
so far as the authority and testimony of Christ and the apostles is of any weight, 
and worthy of regard; so that if the writings in the New Testament be from God, 
the Old Testament is from him also, and is handed down to us uncorrupted, unless 
it has been corrupted since that time, which is many ways impossible, as might be 
easily shewn, were there need of it. At the same time, the prophecies contained 
in the Old Testament, of those very events which are recorded in the New, prove 
the latter to be from God, as has been shewn. In a word, the writings in the Old 
Testament are all established as the oracles of God, by those in the New: And that 
the writings in the New Testament are by divine inspiration, there is much and clear 
evidence from the writings of the Old. So that there could not be so much, so great 
evidence of the divine authority of either of them, if we had only one, without 
the other.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.i-p44">The Jews did not indeed acknowledge that their scriptures were 
fulfilled in Jesus Christ, and continue as a body to reject the gospel, as not from 
God. But this is so far from being any evidence against the divinity of the writings 
of the New Testament, that it is a great confirmation of it. For it was foretold 
by the prophets, whose writings they acknowledge to be from God, chat they should 
thus reject Christ and the gospel, and for this be cast off by God, and the church 
be called by another name: So that their unbelief and opposition to the gospel, 
is a clear and standing evidence of the truth of it.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.i-p45">IV. The great care taken by Jews and christians to receive no 
writings as divinely inspired, but those of which they had proper evidence that 
they were such; and to preserve <pb n="29" id="iii.i-Page_29" />those which they did receive as such 
from being corrupted or altered, is a further evidence that these writings are from 
God. If God has given a standing revelation to men, which is committed to writing, 
he will doubtless take care in his providence that it shall be received on good 
evidence and preserved uncorrupt; and that it shall be handed down to posterity 
in such manner and circumstances, as that all future generations shall have good 
evidence, that it was with proper care and caution received at first, and not without 
good evidence, that it was of divine authority; and that it has been handed down 
to them uncorrupt. And when we find the writings of the Bible be received and handed 
down to us in this manner, it carries an evidence that it is from God, which otherwise 
we could not have. That the writings of the Old and New Testaments have been thus 
received, and carefully preserved uncorrupt, has been abundantly proved by those 
who have written on the subject. It would swell this chapter beyond its designed 
brevity to produce this evidence at large. It may suffice only to observe here, 
that Jews and christians have been a guard with respect to each other, so as to 
render it impossible there should be any alteration made in the writings of the 
Old Testament, in favour of, or against either, without being detected by the other. 
And among christians, the different sects and opposite parties, which early sprung 
up in the church, made it impossible that they should agree to alter and corrupt 
those writings, which were received as divine oracles by them all; and if one sect 
or party had attempted it, they must have been detected by others.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.i-p46">V. The consistence and harmony found in the scriptures, is another 
argument of their divine original The agreement between the writings of the Old 
Testament and those of the New has been already mentioned; but the agreement of 
every particular part with the whole, and of every sentiment and sentence with each 
other, is the fact now intended. A divine revelation must be perfectly consistent 
and harmonious throughout, though it consists of many parts, and be made by many 
different men, and at different times and ages distant from each other. Therefore 
if any real, material contradictions or inconsistencies can be found in this book, 
it <pb n="30" id="iii.i-Page_30" />will be a sufficient reason for rejecting it, as not from God. There 
may be seeming contradictions, at first view, and to a superficial reader, and to 
one who does not attend to it with honesty and candour; but with prejudice and disaffection. 
This we know to be the case with respect to human writings, in many instances, when 
the fault lies wholly in the ignorance or prejudice of the objector, and the upright 
and judicious know them to be perfectly consistent. How much more may we expect 
it will be so with respect to those writings which come from God, and treat of the 
sublime things respecting his being, character, kingdom, designs, laws, works, &amp;c. 
and which must be really contrary to every wrong propensity and lust of man.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.i-p47">This indeed we find to be verified: Many have thought they have 
found numerous contradictions in the Bible; and its enemies have eagerly searched 
to find them, and have used all their art and plausible colouring to make them appear 
to be real contradictions; and urged them with all their powers against revelation. 
But this has turned to the advantage of the holy scriptures, and been the occasion 
of making their consistence and harmony more evident and certain, than if no such 
accusation had been brought against them. For the objections of this kind have been 
critically examined, and found to be entirely groundless. And since all the wit 
and art of men of the best abilities, and under the greatest advantages to try, 
cannot find any real contradictions in them; and those which have been most plausibly 
urged, or have had the greatest appearance of inconsistencies, at first view, appear, 
upon careful and thorough examination, to be perfectly consistent, this has cast 
new light on the subject, and made it more abundantly evident and certain that there 
is indeed no inconsistency to be found in them.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.i-p48">This is a very powerful argument that they are given by divine 
inspiration. For if those writings were only the contrivance of men, it appears 
impossible that so many men, who lived in different ages, of different natural tempers, 
and in such different and various circumstances and connections, writing on such 
a variety of subjects, with such difference of manner, style and expression, <pb n="31" id="iii.i-Page_31" />
should so perfectly agree; and that even in those passages which at first view, 
and to a cursory, inattentive observer, may seem to contradict each other. There 
can be no parallel instance produced under heaven, of any number of writers thus 
agreeing, though they lived in the same age: and it is difficult to find any one 
author, not inspired, consistent with himself throughout. Therefore this consistence 
and harmony running through the writings of such a number of men, who lived in different 
ages, and which took up the space of fifteen hundred years to complete them, after 
they were begun, proves they must have been inspired by the all seeing, unchangeable 
God.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.i-p49">VI. The contents of the Bible, or the truths therein revealed 
and the duties enjoined, are the greatest and crowning evidence that these writings 
are given by divine inspiration, and serve to strengthen and confirm all the other 
arguments which have been mentioned.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.i-p50">This argument will of course be particularly illustrated in the 
proposed following work, in which the scriptures are to be examined, in order to 
find what are the truths and duties therein revealed and inculcated; what system 
of religion is there taught. It may be proper, however, to observe here in general, 
that we find in the Bible an orderly, intelligible, concise and well connected history 
of all those events which are most important and necessary to be known by the church, 
from the beginning of the world, down to the time in which this book was completed. 
The being, character, designs and works of God, are represented to be such as reason 
must approve, and pronounce harmonious, and becoming the true God. The state and 
character of man, and God’s designs and works respecting him, are set in a clear 
light. What God requires of man, as his duty, and the way in which he may find acceptance 
with God, and be happy, are particularly stated with great plainness. A judgment 
to come, and a future state of rewards and punishments, are revealed. Promises to 
those who believe and obey the truth, and threatenings to the disobedient and impenitent, 
run through all those writings; and the best and strongest conceivable motives are 
set <pb n="32" id="iii.i-Page_32" />before men, to deter them from sin, and excite them to fear and 
obey God.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.i-p51">Here two things may be observed,—</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.i-p52">1. What is revealed in the scriptures concerning the perfections 
and works of God, his laws as the rule of duty, the nature and evil tendency of 
sin, and the description given of true virtue and religion, and their happy tendency 
and end, appears so reasonable and evident to every attentive person, when revealed, 
that this, with the other evidences that have been mentioned, is sufficient to convince 
the reason and judgment of every one, that this is a revelation from God, though 
their hearts be ever so corrupt and vicious; and has generally proved sufficient, 
unless where peculiar prejudices by education or otherwise, have taken place.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.i-p53">2. The honest, virtuous mind only, which does discern and relish 
the beauty and excellence of truth and virtue, will see and feel the full force 
of this argument for the divinity of the holy scriptures. Such have true discerning 
to see the wonderful, excellent, glorious things revealed in the holy scriptures, 
which in themselves carry a most satisfying and infallible evidence of their truth 
and divinity. They see the divine stamp which this system of truth carries on it, 
and believe and are sure that this is the true God, and that here is eternal life 
. They therefore no longer need any other evidence but this which they find in the 
contents of the holy scriptures; in this they rest satisfied, and are assured that 
the writings contained in the Bible are the word of God.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.i-p54">Thus the holy scriptures are attended with the highest possible 
evidence that they came from God; they carry that external and internal evidence 
of their divinity, to the reason and conscience of men, which is sufficient to convince 
them, however corrupt their hearts may be: But the highest internal evidence is 
fully discerned only by the humble honest mind, which is disposed to relish, love 
and receive the truth. To such the true light shines from the holy scriptures with 
irresistible evidence, and their hearts are established in the truth. They believe 
from evidence they have within themselves; from what they see and find in the Bible. 
And as all might have this evidence and certainty that the contents <pb n="33" id="iii.i-Page_33" />
of the Bible are from God, did they not exercise and indulge those unreasonable 
lusts, which blind their eyes to the beauty and excellence of divine truth, unbelief 
is in every instance and degree of it wholly inexcusable and very criminal.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.i-p55">Having considered the abundant evidence there is that the writings 
contained in the Bible are given by divine inspiration, the following observations 
may be made concerning this sacred book.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.i-p56">1. This is a complete, unerring and perfect rule of faith and 
practice, and the only rule. This being understood and believed, is sufficient to 
make men wise unto salvation; and we have no warrant to believe any religious truth, 
unless it be revealed, or can be supported by the holy scriptures; and this is the 
only rule of our duty. We may be certain, if God has given us a revelation, it is 
in all respects complete, and in the best manner suited to answer the end: And must 
be the only standard of truth and duty.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.i-p57">2. Whatever may be justly and clearly inferred as a certain consequence 
from what is expressly revealed in the scriptures, must be considered as contained 
in divine revelation, as really as that which is expressed. For instance, if from 
any two or more truths, expressly revealed, another certainty follows, that other 
truth, by the supposition, is really contained in those expressly revealed, and 
therefore is in fact revealed or made known, in the revelation of them.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.i-p58">3. The holy scriptures are not to be understood without a constant, 
laborious attention to them, and a careful examination and search of them, in order 
to know the mind and will of God therein revealed. This is no evidence that the 
scriptures are not plain and easy to be understood; as plain and intelligible, as 
in the nature of things they can be, and adapted, in the best manner, to give instruction 
in those things about which they treat: For they cannot be instructed by the best 
possible means of instruction, who will not attend and take pains. They only who 
“incline their ear unto wisdom, and apply their heart to understanding; who cry 
after knowledge, and lift up their voice for understanding; who seek her <pb n="34" id="iii.i-Page_34" />
as silver, and search for her as for hid treasures,” will understand the sacred 
writings.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.i-p59">4. The holy scriptures were never designed to be understood, especially 
in those things that are most important and excellent, by persons of corrupt minds, 
whose hearts have no relish for these things: but do wholly oppose and hate them, 
and are determined in a course of disobedience to them. It is impossible indeed, 
that such should understand the sublime holy truths that relate to the infinitely 
holy God, his holy law, gospel and kingdom. Therefore their not being understood 
by such is no argument that they are not sufficiently plain. It is no evidence that 
the sun does not shine clear and bright, because they who have no eyes, or if they 
have, refuse to open them, do not see the light, and discern the objects it plainly 
discovers. It is abundantly declared in scripture, that wicked, evil men, will not 
understand the things there revealed. “The wicked know not, neither will they understand: 
They walk on in darkness.”<note n="9" id="iii.i-p59.1"><p class="normal" id="iii.i-p60"><scripRef id="iii.i-p60.1" passage="Psalm xxviii. 5" parsed="|Ps|28|5|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Ps.28.5">Psalm xxviii. 5</scripRef>.</p></note> “Evil men understand not 
judgment.”<note n="10" id="iii.i-p60.2"><p class="normal" id="iii.i-p61"><scripRef id="iii.i-p61.1" passage="Prov. xviii. 5" parsed="|Prov|18|5|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Prov.18.5">Prov. xviii. 5</scripRef>.</p></note> “The natural man (that is, the man of a 
corrupt, carnal mind) receiveth not the things of the Spirit of God; for they are 
foolish unto him: Neither can he know them, because they are spiritually discerned.”<note n="11" id="iii.i-p61.2"><p class="normal" id="iii.i-p62">
<scripRef id="iii.i-p62.1" passage="1 Cor. ii. 14" parsed="|1Cor|2|14|0|0" osisRef="Bible:1Cor.2.14">1 Cor. ii. 14</scripRef>.</p></note> Christ says to the Jews, “How can ye believe, which 
receive honour one of another, and seek not the honour that cometh from God only!”<note n="12" id="iii.i-p62.2"><p class="normal" id="iii.i-p63">
John V. 44.</p></note> And again, “If any man will do his will, (that is, has an obedient 
heart ready to comply with the will of God, when it is made known to him) he shall 
know the doctrine, whether it be of God, or whether I speak of myself.”<note n="13" id="iii.i-p63.1"><p class="normal" id="iii.i-p64"><scripRef id="iii.i-p64.1" passage="John vii. 17" parsed="|John|7|17|0|0" osisRef="Bible:John.7.17">John 
vii. 17</scripRef>.</p></note> This implies that they who are of a contrary disposition do not 
understand and know, which is expressly asserted in the following words, “Every 
one that doth evil hateth the light, neither cometh to the light, lest his deeds 
should be reproved. But he that doth truth cometh to the light.”<note n="14" id="iii.i-p64.2"><p class="normal" id="iii.i-p65"><scripRef id="iii.i-p65.1" passage="John iii. 20" parsed="|John|3|20|0|0" osisRef="Bible:John.3.20">John iii. 
20</scripRef>, <scripRef passage="John 3:21" id="iii.i-p65.2" parsed="|John|3|21|0|0" osisRef="Bible:John.3.21">21</scripRef>.</p></note> Therefore, if the scriptures be dark and unintelligible to any, especially 
in the most important matters there revealed, it is not owing to any defect or darkness 
in them; but the fault is wholly in the persons themselves, <pb n="35" id="iii.i-Page_35" />and they 
are altogether inexcusable and criminal, in not seeing what is revealed with sufficient 
clearness.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.i-p66">5. It can therefore be easily accounted for, that these sacred 
writings should be so little understood by multitudes, and so greatly misunderstood 
by many; and that there should be so many different and opposite opinions respecting 
the doctrines and duties inculcated in the Bible, among those who enjoy this revelation, 
and profess to make it their rule. This is not the least evidence of any defect 
in the scriptures, or that they are not sufficiently plain, and in the best manner 
suited to give instruction; but is wholly owing to the criminal blindness, corrupt 
propensities and unreasonable prejudices of men; who do not attend to the Bible 
with an honest heart. It is impossible that a revelation should be given, that cannot 
be misunderstood, and perverted to the worst purposes and to support the greatest 
errors and delusions, by the prejudices, wicked blindness, and perverse inclinations 
of artful men. Nothing has taken place, with respect to this, but what might justly 
be expected, if mankind are naturally as depraved and rebellious, as the scriptures 
represent them to be; and is perfectly consistent with the perfection of divine 
revelation. And when men shall in general become honest and virtuous to a proper 
degree, and their hearts shall be turned to the Lord, and to his word, willing and 
ready to receive the dictates of heaven, the vail of darkness and error will vanish, 
and the true light which has so long shined in darkness, and so has not been seen 
and comprehended, shall shine in their hearts, and they, receiving the truth in 
the love of it, will be “perfectly joined together, in the same mind and in the 
same judgment.”</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.i-p67">This brings another observation into view.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.i-p68">6. The chief and greatest end of divine revelation is not yet 
answered. The Bible has been greatly neglected and abused, and not understood; and 
perverted to evil purposes by most of those who have enjoyed it. This light has 
hitherto shined, in a great measure, in vain, in the criminal darkness of this world, 
which has not comprehended, but abused and rejected it. And those few who have in 
some measure understood and received <pb n="36" id="iii.i-Page_36" />and practised the truth, have 
done it in a very imperfect degree; and the Bible has not been yet fully understood 
by any: But this same revelation informs us that it shall not always be so; but 
the time is coming, and is now just at hand, when God will destroy the face of the 
covering cast over all people, and the vail that is spread over all nations, by 
causing the gospel to be preached to them all, and giving them a heart to discern 
and understand the truth. Then “the light of the moon shall be as the light of the 
sun, and the light of the sun shall be seven fold, as the light of seven days.” 
And the eyes of them that see shall not be dim, and the ears of them that hear, 
shall hearken. The heart also of the rash or inconsiderate foolish, shall understand 
knowledge, and the tongue of the stammerers shall be ready to speak plainly, and 
the earth shall be filled with the knowledge of the glory of the Lord, as the waters 
cover the sea.” In that time the Bible shall be understood, and all the institutions 
and ordinances of the gospel shall have their proper, greatest and most happy effect, 
in the illumination and salvation of multitudes. All that precedes this time is 
but preparatory in order to introduce this day of salvation, in the reign of Christ 
on earth. The word of God shall then have free course and be glorified, as it never 
was before, and shall fully answer the end for which it was given.<note n="15" id="iii.i-p68.1"><p class="normal" id="iii.i-p69">See Treatise 
on the Millennium, at the end of this System.</p></note></p>
<h2 id="iii.i-p69.1">REFLECTIONS.</h2>
<p class="normal" id="iii.i-p70">I. WHAT gratitude do we owe to God for giving such a complete 
revelation to men, every way suited to give instruction in every necessary and most 
important truth: and without which mankind must have remained in the grossest darkness! 
What gratitude do we owe to God, who has distinguished us from so great a part of 
mankind, in giving us to enjoy this inestimable privilege, while they are left to 
grope in the dark!</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.i-p71">The enemies to divine revelation have made this an objection against 
it, and said, if it were from God, it would have been given equally to all mankind, 
and not confined to so small a part, as this revelation has been. <pb n="37" id="iii.i-Page_37" />
Such a partial revelation, say they, which was not completed or even began till 
after many ages and generations were passed and gone; and which when it is given 
is confined to so small a part of mankind, cannot be from God, who has no respect 
of persons, and would not conceal what is necessary to be known, from the greatest 
part of men, while a few only are indulged with this favour, if it be one. Among 
other things which might be and have been said in answer to this objection, it may 
be sufficient only to observe the following.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.i-p72">1. God was under no obligation to enter on those designs of good 
and salvation, and do those things in favour of man, which are now made known: And 
therefore could not be obliged to make this revelation. And if he is obliged to 
none, he may for good reasons, known to him, though we should not see them, order 
things so that but few shall enjoy it, as a distinguishing sovereign favour, while 
others are left in that state of darkness, in which <i>all</i> might have justly 
been left.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.i-p73">2. It is wholly owing to the fault of man that this revelation 
has been so long, and still is confined to such narrow bounds, and is known to so 
small a part of mankind. The most essential things in this revelation were made 
known to the first parents of mankind. Had they been faithful, and all their posterity 
wise, and disposed to make a good improvement of the light, it would have continued 
and increased, and every one of them would have enjoyed it. And after this light 
was abused and rejected, and almost wholly put out, by the wickedness of man, before 
the flood, it was again restored to the new world in the family of Noah; and was 
soon corrupted and extinguished by men, when they multiplied into nations, because 
they loved darkness, and hated this light. And when this revelation was renewed 
and enlarged, committed to writing and completed, had mankind been as desirous of 
knowing the truth, and as inquisitive after it, as they ought to have been; and 
had they, who enjoyed it, been as ready and as much engaged to understand and practise 
it, and spread and communicate it to others, as was most reasonable, and their duty, 
all nations would have enjoyed it fully, soon after it was published. It is not 
therefore owing <pb n="38" id="iii.i-Page_38" />to divine revelation that it is so confined, and not 
universal; but the fault is wholly in man. And it is to be wholly ascribed to God’s 
merciful, irresistible interposition and care, that it has not been wholly lost 
and destroyed by men, long before this time. Therefore the scriptures being preserved 
as they have been, and handed down to this day, and put into our hands by God’s 
merciful, wise, sovereign interposition and direction, is both an argument that 
they are from God, and of our great obligations to gratitude to him for this unspeakably 
distinguishing favour.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.i-p74">3. It may be observed, that they who do not enjoy this revelation, 
do not live up to the light they have, but misimprove and abuse it: And therefore 
have no reason to complain, that they have not greater light and advantages; but 
are most righteously given up to their chosen blindness and darkness. There cannot 
be a person that lives, or ever has lived in the heathen world, produced, who has 
fully improved, and lived up to the light he has had, or might have had, were it 
not his own fault. Divine revelation warrants this assertion. “The invisible things 
of God, from the creation of the world, are clearly seen, being understood by the 
things that are made, even his eternal power and divinity; <i>so that they are without 
excuse</i>; because that when they knew God, they glorified him not as God, neither 
were thankful, but became vain in their imaginations, and their foolish heart was 
darkened.”</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.i-p75">Oh! Let us not be unthankful, who enjoy so much greater light, 
which will render our ingratitude proportionably more criminal, and dreadful in 
its consequences. This leads to another reflection.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.i-p76">II. How very criminal and wretched are they who neglect or abuse 
this inestimable privilege of a revelation from God!—Many not only disregard it 
in practice, but reject and despise it, and speak evil of it. How much will the 
deists, who have been, and now are in the christian world, have to answer for! What 
they call foolishness, is the wisdom of God; and the wisdom of which they boast, 
is the height of folly and madness. Would to God there were none who abused and 
despised the holy scriptures, but professed deists! Multitudes, who <pb n="39" id="iii.i-Page_39" />
profess to believe the Bible is a revelation from heaven, hold this truth in unrighteousness: 
They pay no proper regard to it, and constantly abuse it innumerable ways; and all 
the advantages they have by it, and concerns with it, will only serve to render 
their damnation greater, and unspeakably more dreadful. How much lower will they 
sink in eternal misery, who by their folly and impenitence perish from the countries 
enjoying divine revelation, than they who perish from heathen lands! This truth, 
though so obvious, solemn, and awakening, is too little thought of, by those who 
enjoy, and yet disregard and abuse the holy scriptures.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.i-p77">III. What obligations are we under to attend to this revelation, 
and make the best improvement of it; surely we ought to study it with great diligence 
and care, and meditate therein day and night, looking to God, the Father of lights, 
with sincerity, earnestness and constancy, that he would prevent our misunderstanding, 
and perverting it, and direct and lead us to discern all the truths he has revealed, 
and give us a heart to conform to them in practice. We ought to pay a conscientious 
and sacred regard to all the directions and commands in the Bible; to turn our feet 
unto these testimonies, and to improve the words of God, as to make it a constant 
light to our feet, and lamp to our path. Blessed are they who thus watch daily at 
wisdom’s gates, and wait at the posts of her doors; for they shall be wise unto 
salvation, obtain favour of the Lord, and find eternal life.</p>

</div2>

<div2 title="Chapter II. Concerning the Being and Perfections of God." prev="iii.i" next="iii.iii" id="iii.ii">

<h2 id="iii.ii-p0.1">CHAP. II.</h2>
<h3 id="iii.ii-p0.2">CONCERNING THE BEING AND PERFECTIONS OF GOD.</h3>
<p class="normal" id="iii.ii-p1">THOUGH the evidence of the existence of God be as clear and certain 
as that of our own, or of any thing else whatever, and it is one of the first dictates 
of reason, when offered to consideration, and attended to; and has by general consent 
been acknowledged by mankind in all ages, as most demonstrable and certain; yet 
it is most probable that even the knowledge, and general <pb n="40" id="iii.ii-Page_40" />acknowledgment 
of this truth depends greatly, if not wholly on divine revelation. Mankind are so 
“alienated from the life of God, through the ignorance that is in them, because 
of the blindness of their hearts;” and so disposed by their depravity and wickedness 
to sink down into brutish ignorance and stupidity with regard to every thing invisible, 
that if they were not first told that there is a God, they would most probably grow 
up without believing, or ever thinking of this truth. The general acknowledgment 
of the being of God, is no evidence that it does not originate from divine revelation; 
for there are many things generally believed and practised in the heathen world, 
in their religion, which evidently depend on tradition; and though in many respects 
corrupted, had their original in divine revelation, handed down from Noah and his 
sons, or taken from the Jews, and the revelation given to them. But one instance 
shall be mentioned, viz. the practice of sacrificing beasts, or some animals, to 
appease the gods, or ingratiate themselves with them, which has so generally obtained 
in the heathen world; and which most certainly never would have been thought of 
by men, had not God first instituted it by revelation; and from that it was handed 
down, and the practice kept up among all nations, even long after they had lost, 
or corrupted, the original intent and design of such sacrifices. So the belief of 
the being of a God may derive from the same origin, and be handed down from generation 
to generation the same way. The following facts seem to favour this supposition, 
if they do not clearly prove it.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.ii-p2">1. The absurd and ridiculous notions respecting God, or a plurality 
of gods, which have generally taken place in the heathen world: Such as the following, 
viz. That there are many gods both male and female—that they are embodied, like 
men and women—have carnal affections and lusts, and commit adulteries, rapes, &amp;c.—have 
cruel hatred and contentions with one another—are taking advantage of each other 
by deceit and cunning, or by power to accomplish their own selfish, unreasonable 
inclinations and designs, &amp;c. &amp;c. All this can be well accounted for; on supposition 
their belief of the being of God depends chiefly on tradition; for this truth, <pb n="41" id="iii.ii-Page_41" />
being thus handed down by tradition, would naturally and easily be corrupted, and 
blended with endless absurd notions, according to the foolish and wicked humours 
and inclinations of man; which has been the case of all religious truths among the 
heathen, which originated from revelation. But if we suppose all nations ill the 
heathen world believe the existence of God by reasoning themselves into it, and 
attending to the clear and abundant evidence there is of this; how can it be accounted 
for, that they should make no use of their reason in forming their notions of Deity 
and determining what kind of a being a God must be; but contrary to all the dictates 
of reason, and the clearest evidence, embrace the greatest absurdities? If their 
belief, in the first instance, be founded on the dictates of reason and evidence, 
why is reason wholly laid aside, in the latter; and as soon as they have reasoned 
themselves into the being of a God, make no further use of their reason; but most
<i>unreasonably</i> believe there are many gods, and embrace the greatest absurdities 
respecting Deity?</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.ii-p3">2. Those people and nations who are most out of the reach of the 
instruction and influence of divine revelation, and of the traditions which originated 
from it, have the most faint belief, and make the least acknowledgment of the being 
of a God. And historians and travellers tell us that there are people, and even 
whole nations, among whom there is not any acknowledgment of a Deity, or the least 
appearance of the belief of any.<note n="16" id="iii.ii-p3.1"><p class="normal" id="iii.ii-p4">See Locke on the Human Understanding, Book 
I. Chap. IV. and the authors there quoted by him. Also Dr. Robertson’s History of 
South America.</p></note> 
These are nations, which by their situation and circumstances, are most out of the 
way of receiving any advantage by revelation, and by being long unconnected, and 
without any intercourse with other nations, have by degrees lost all tradition relating 
to every thing invisible. This seems to be a proof that if mankind were without 
all the light and advantages of a revelation, and traditions which originate from 
it, they would not pay any regard to an invisible supreme Being, or entertain any 
belief or notion of such a being; but would, in every <pb n="42" id="iii.ii-Page_42" />sense, “live 
without God in the world.” And, by the way, this may serve to shew what need mankind 
stand in, of a divine revelation, and that all religious light and knowledge originates 
wholly from this source.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.ii-p5">3. There have been instances of persons who have been deaf from 
their birth, and consequently dumb; and after they have arrived to adult or middle 
age, have been able to hear and speak: And though before this, they attended public 
worship with others, and appeared very devout; and often made those signs which 
those with whom they conversed in this way, thought were expressions of their belief 
of the being of God, and of their piety: Yet, when they came to hear and speak, 
they declared, that +hey never had a thought that there was a God, until they could 
hear, and were by that means informed. And there never has been an instance known, 
of any such person’s declaring that he had any belief or thought of the existence 
of a God, before he could hear and speak.<note n="17" id="iii.ii-p5.1"><p class="normal" id="iii.ii-p6">See President Clap’s Essay on the Nature and Foundation of Moral 
Virtue. Page 42, &amp;c. The following is transcribed from him, page 45. “I was well 
acquainted with a Negro, who was a man of superior natural powers, and made a profession 
of religion; who told me that he was born in the island of Madagascar, and lived 
there till he was above thirty years old: And in all that time he never had a thought 
of the being of a God, a Creator or Governor of the world, or of a future state 
after death.”</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.ii-p7">“Dr. Williots, in his sermon on the Light of Nature, relates a 
story of a man in France, who was born deaf and dumb; yet was very knowing, active 
and faithful in the common affairs of life: And upon a solemn trial before the bishop, 
by the help of those who could converse with him, was judged to be a knowing and 
devout christian, and admitted to the Sacrament of the Lord’s Supper, which he attended 
for many years, with all the signs of high devotion, such as elevation of hands, 
eyes, &amp;c. At length a large quantity of hard wax was taken out of his ears; upon 
which he could hear; and, after a while, could speak and read. He then declared, 
that while he was deaf, he had no idea of a God, or maker of the world, or of a 
future state; and that all he then did, in matters of religion, was purely in imitation 
of others.”</p></note></p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.ii-p8">Are not these facts an evidence that though the being, of God 
is so clearly manifested in the works of creation and providence, yet mankind, in 
their present fallen, corrupt state, would not discern and acknowledge this truth, 
had it not been otherwise revealed?</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.ii-p9">And since the nature of all sin, so far as it has dominion in 
the heart, is real Atheism, and a denial of the God who is above; and therefore 
the fool, the wicked man, always says in his heart, “There is no God:” and the <pb n="43" id="iii.ii-Page_43" />
tendency of it is to darken and stupify the mind, or rather is itself blindness 
and stupidity, with regard to the being of God, and every thing invisible, and naturally 
shuts all these things out of the mind; it can be easily accounted for, that without 
a revelation, the reason of man, who is totally corrupt and sinful, will never suggest 
to him the being of a God, however evident and demonstrable this is to reason, when 
once suggested and revealed, and men can be excited and persuaded to attend to the 
evidence, and exercise their reason on the subject.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.ii-p10">We will now take a short and summary view of the evidence there 
is of this great and fundamental truth of all morality and religion; and mention 
some of the arguments which offer themselves to our reason, when we attend to the 
subject. These are not long and intricate; but when the truth is once suggested 
to us, it becomes an object of intuition, in a sense, so that though there be reasoning 
in the case, it is so short and easy, that it strikes the mind at once, and it is 
hardly conscious of any reasoning upon it, and of the medium by which the evidence 
comes to the mind. Hence it is probable, that some have thought, doubtless without 
any good reason for it, that the existence of God is, what they call an <i>innate 
idea</i>, which is essential to the mind of man, and impressed on it, independent 
of all reasoning on the subject.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.ii-p11">I. It is certain there is a God from our own existence, and the 
things we behold around us. There must be some cause of the existence of these things. 
They could not cause their own existence, or make themselves; because this is a 
contradiction. There must therefore be some invisible cause which existed before 
them, and was able to give them existence, and to uphold them when they were made. 
And this first cause, maker and preserver of all things, is God.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.ii-p12">It is natural for the inquisitive mind, when it is necessarily 
led thus far, to inquire, how came God to exist? Or, what is the cause of his existence? 
If he be the first cause, he must be the cause of his own existence, which implies 
a contradiction, or he must exist without any cause, and without beginning, which 
is perfectly inconceivable; and we may as well suppose the world <pb n="44" id="iii.ii-Page_44" />exists 
without a cause, and go no farther back for a cause; and then we find no evidence 
of the existence of God.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.ii-p13">Answer, The first cause of all things we behold, must certainly 
exist without beginning, and so without any cause, that is antecedent to his existence, 
or that is without himself. Yet there may be a reason or cause of his existence 
within himself, viz. The necessity of his existence, so that he exists necessarily, 
there being no other possible way or supposition, or it being infinitely impossible 
it should be otherwise; universal non existence, being the greatest contradiction 
in nature.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.ii-p14">If it should be said, this runs all into darkness; for we can 
no more conceive of God’s existing necessarily, and without beginning to exist, 
than we can of the world’s existing without a cause; and therefore gives no relief 
to the mind: An easy, and it is hoped, a satisfactory answer, is at hand. It is 
a plain contradiction to say, that the world and all things in it exist without 
a cause, or a reason why they exist, rather than not: But necessary existence, and 
existence without beginning, implies no contradiction or impossibility. It is granted, 
that each of them is to us incomprehensible; but this is so far from being any argument 
against the truth and reality of them, that it is rather an evidence in favour of 
them; for if there be a God, he must be incomprehensible, as he is an infinite being, 
and exists in a manner infinitely above us; therefore must be infinitely above and 
beyond the comprehension of finite minds. It is very unreasonable to object that 
against the being of a God, which certainly must be true if God exists.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.ii-p15">II. The being of God is evident from the <i>manner</i> of our 
own existence, and of all things visible, viz. the design, contrivance and wisdom 
that appear in them. It would fill volumes fully to illustrate this argument from 
the works of creation and providence, as this design and wisdom appear in them all; 
and the more particularly they are considered, the more clear the wisdom appears 
and shines. Volumes have been written on the subject, and many more might be written, 
and yet the subject not be exhausted. But it is not consistent with the design of 
this work, to enter particularly into this subject. <pb n="45" id="iii.ii-Page_45" />Every one must 
have observed so much of this, as to see the propriety and force of this argument, 
at first view, unless he be very criminally inattentive. The innumerable creatures 
and things which come under our observation appear to be contrived and formed to 
answer some end; and the numerous ranks of different animals are all furnished with 
provision for their own support and defence, and have members and organs suited 
to their situation, and to obtain, receive and use what is necessary for the support 
of their lives, &amp;c. If we attend only to our own bodies, we shall find them so admirably 
contrived, and so curiously formed; and though of so many parts, each one is suited 
to the rest, and all so contrived as to form one harmonious system of animal life, 
without any defect or any thing superfluous; is it possible, if we make any proper 
use of our reason, that we should find ourselves inhabiting such bodies, without 
discerning the contrivance and wisdom of our make, and seeing and acknowledging 
the hand and skill of the wise Author of this frame, so curious in all its parts 
and movements? As well may we behold a most beautiful, well contrived palace, furnished 
with every thing convenient and comfortable to dwell in, having nothing useless, 
nothing wanting; and not have one thought of a wise skilful architect, who contrived 
and built it; or imagine this building might exist without the exertion of any design 
or wisdom and have no author and maker.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.ii-p16">Surely we cannot survey ourselves and the world in which we are, 
and see the design and contrivance apparently running through the whole, and not 
be convinced that there must be a wise contriver and author who has made them. Not 
to think of and acknowledge this, is to be more like beasts, than rational creatures. 
The language of the Psalmist is most rational and natural, when contemplating the 
works of creation and providence. “O Lord, how manifold are thy works! in wisdom 
hast thou made them all.”</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.ii-p17">III. The being of God is made evident by the holy scriptures. 
Not merely by being there abundantly asserted; but by the existence of such a book 
as the Bible. It is as much impossible there should be such a book, <pb n="46" id="iii.ii-Page_46" />
were there no God, as that there should be such a world as we see, without an invisible 
cause. For it is as much beyond the power and skill of man, or any number of men, 
to form such a book, as it is to make the world. It is impossible that such a number 
of men, who lived in ages at such a distance from each other, should write so much, 
and not contradict themselves, nor each other; but agree and harmonize in every 
thing, were there no invisible, unerring, omniscient Being to direct and guide them: 
As impossible as it was that every stone and piece of timber in Solomon’s temple, 
should come together, and be exactly fitted to its place, so as to make one complete, 
harmonious building, without any design, or contrivance; but by mere accident or 
chance. The character of God there given is far above and beside the thought of 
man, and could no more be drawn by man, were there no such God, than the world can 
be made by him. And the law of God there given, and at last summed up and comprehended 
in one sentence, “<i>Thou shalt love the Lord with all thy heart, and thy neighbour 
as thyself</i>,” could no more be thought of and contrived by man, than the heavens 
and the earth could be planned and produced by him. The series of miracles wrought 
by those who said there was a God, and that Jehovah was the only true God; that 
he spake to them, and they did these wonders in his name, and by his power, are 
a standing proof of the existence of God.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.ii-p18">But above all, the predictions contained in the Bible, with their 
exact and certain accomplishment, is a striking proof and demonstration of the existence 
of an omniscient, omnipotent Being. For it is as much beyond the art and power of 
men to foretel so many thousand events, so precisely answering the prediction, as 
it is for him to make the sun, moon and stars.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.ii-p19">All these have been urged as proofs of the divinity of the scriptures, 
and they are equal proofs of the being of God. Therefore, though invisible things 
of God are clearly seen in the works of creation and providence, even his eternal 
power and godhead; so that all the nations who have not the Bible are left without 
excuse, which if they do not believe in, love and worship the true God: yet they 
who enjoy this book have more clear evidence <pb n="47" id="iii.ii-Page_47" />
of the being of God, as well as unspeakably greater advantages to know his true 
character; and consequently are far more inexcusable than the heathen, if they do 
not believe.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.ii-p20">Upon the evidence of the existence of God, two things may be observed.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.ii-p21">1. Though this be as evident a truth as any whatsoever, and men 
may have a full rational conviction of it, while their hearts are opposite to it, 
and receive no impressions answerable to this truth, and the whole system of their 
affections and exercises of heart, are just as if this were not true, or directly 
contrary to it; yet do really say in their hearts, there is no God. Therefore we 
find this asserted in the scriptures, “The fool, (that is, the wicked man whose 
heart is wholly corrupt, as it is there explained) says in his heart there is no 
God.” Hence it is, that this conviction and profession, that there is a God, in 
multitudes of instances, has little or no effect on the heart and practice; but 
while they profess to know there is a God, in their hearts and in their works they 
deny him. In this case, <i>the heart</i> governs the man, and forms his true moral 
character, and not his speculative conviction and judgment, which is so weak and 
ineffectual that it flies, or vanishes, into nothing, before the strong fixed propensities 
of the ungodly heart, as a bubble is blown away by the strong blast of a furious 
wind.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.ii-p22">2. Where the heart is upright and honest, and men have a proper 
taste and relish for moral truth, the evidence of the being of God is discerned 
in a true light. The being and true character of God appear to be a pleasing reality; 
they have a genuine and powerful impression on the heart, and its leading affections 
and exercises are answerable to the truth. Therefore the scriptures represent such 
only, as knowing God and believing in him; and others are spoken of as not knowing 
God, and saying in their hearts there is no God, and in their works denying him. 
The latter are in darkness, and walk in darkness which blindeth their eyes. The 
god of this world hath blinded their minds, so that they believe not, and the light 
of the glorious gospel of Christ, who is the image of God, doth not shine unto them. 
But the light shines into the hearts of the former, and <pb n="48" id="iii.ii-Page_48" />gives them 
the light of the knowledge of the glory of God, ill the face of Jesus Christ. For 
where the being of God is truly discerned, his whole revealed character, or his 
glory, is in some good measure seen; and they who have not discerning and relish 
of this glory, which is true of all wicked men, have not that belief of the being 
of God which good men have, as their faith consists in mere speculation; which is 
not the true light. This is so plain, that a heathen has said, “The mind destitute 
of virtue, cannot see the beauty of truth.”<note n="18" id="iii.ii-p22.1"><p class="normal" id="iii.ii-p23">Hierocles.</p></note></p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.ii-p24">This leads us to consider the character and perfections of God; 
or what God is. This is the must important subject in the whole compass of divinity, 
as right conceptions of God lay the best and only foundation for religious knowledge 
and right sentiments in general: And it is no doubt true, that all who agree in 
their sentiments respecting the divine character, will also agree in the same system 
of religious truth: And the origin of the difference and opposition of opinion that 
have taken place among professing christians, respecting the doctrines of Christianity, 
is their different and opposite notions of the character and perfections of God. 
Therefore the true knowledge of God is often mentioned in scripture as the sum of 
all knowledge, and comprehending all religious knowledge. This affords a good reason 
for our attending to this awful subject with great care and caution; with solemnity 
of mind, reverence and devotion, searching the holy scriptures, and praying that 
we may be saved from wrong and dishonourable conceptions of God; and obtain the 
true knowledge of him.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.ii-p25">What are called the <i>natural</i> perfections of God, as distinguished 
from his <i>moral</i> perfections, are first to be considered. There is a general 
agreement respecting these, among those who enjoy divine revelation, as men are 
not so prone to prejudice and error on this head, as they are concerning the other. 
It will therefore be needless to enlarge here.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.ii-p26">We are warranted by the scriptures, and it appears reasonable, 
to exclude every thing that implies any imperfection, when we consider what God 
is; and ascribe <pb n="49" id="iii.ii-Page_49" />to him nothing that is not absolutely perfect in the 
highest degree. Therefore we must conceive God to be a pure spirit, which the scriptures 
assert: And hence we are certain that nothing corporeal, or that has any shape, 
figure or limits, is to be ascribed to him. Hence it is unreasonable and very dishonourable 
to God, to attempt to make any image or likeness of him, by any thing that has figure 
or shape, or to form or entertain any such notion in our minds. Moses gave a particular 
caution on this head to the people of Israel. “The Lord spake unto you out of the 
midst of the fire: ye heard the voice of the words, but saw no similitude, only 
ye heard a voice. Take ye therefore good heed unto yourselves, lest ye corrupt yourselves, 
and make you a graven image, the similitude of any figure; for ye saw no manner 
of similitude on the day that the Lord spake unto you in Horeb, out of the midst 
of the fire.” And this is expressly prohibited in the second command, “Thou 
shalt not make unto thee any graven image, or any likeness of any thing that is 
in heaven above, or that is in the earth beneath, or that is in the water under 
the earth.” Therefore when God is spoken of in the scriptures as if he had bodily 
parts and members, hands, eyes, cars, mouth, &amp;c.—these expressions are to be taken 
in a figurative sense, and mean no more than that God does see and hear, &amp;c. which 
we perform by those members and organs; and not that he has <i>eyes of flesh</i>, 
or sees as man does: Such language being used as better suited to convey knowledge 
to our minds, in conformity to man’s way of speaking and conceiving.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.ii-p27">In the scriptures God is represented as an <i>infinite</i> being, 
that he is, in every respect, without limits or bounds. His existence is infinite, 
or in him is an infinite degree of existence, so that all created existence is nothing 
when compared with him; and indeed is comprehended in him, and is really no addition 
to existence, it being only an emanation from him, the fountain and sum of all existence. 
And all his attributes and perfections are infinite, according to the scriptures. 
“His understanding is infinite,” and consequently every thing that can be attributed 
to him.</p>
<pb n="50" id="iii.ii-Page_50" />
<p class="normal" id="iii.ii-p28">And reason teaches that God must be infinite. He who exists without 
any cause, that is, without himself, or who exists of and from himself, from the 
necessity of his own nature; or, in other words, exists necessarily, must be infinite 
or cannot have any bounds or limits, in any respect; and that for these two plain 
reasons,</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.ii-p29">L He can be limited or bounded by no thing, because there can 
be nothing to limit him; no possible cause or reason of any kind of limitation; 
and therefore there can be none.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.ii-p30">2. Necessary existence must be infinite; for as there can be nothing 
to bound this necessity, it must take place with respect to every possible degree 
of existence, and is as much a reason of infinite existence, as of any existence 
at all. If any existence be necessary, infinite existence is necessary; so that 
it is a plain contradiction to suppose that God exists of himself, or necessarily; 
and yet has but a limited degree of existence, or is not infinite.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.ii-p31">Hence it appears that God exists without beginning, or end; or 
is eternal, as he is represented in the scriptures: For he who has no limits, but 
is infinite, can have neither beginning or end, or must be infinite in duration. 
And necessary existence must be eternal, because this same necessity cannot be limited 
as to time or duration; but is always the same. It is a contradiction to say that 
self existence, or which is the same, necessary existence, does not exist, or can 
cease to exist.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.ii-p32">For the same reason God is unchangeable in all respects; which 
the holy scriptures abundantly assert. He who exists necessarily, and is infinite, 
must exist unchangeably in the most perfect manner and degree. Change, or alteration 
in any respect, necessarily supposes limitation and imperfection. And as God is 
eternal and immutable, he must be without any succession; for this supposes change, 
and an advance in years and increase of duration. God does not grow older; there 
is nothing first or last, no beginning or end, past or to come, with respect to 
him; he has no change or succession of ideas; but he inhabits or possesses eternity, 
without the least variation or shadow of turning.</p>
<pb n="51" id="iii.ii-Page_51" />
<p class="normal" id="iii.ii-p33">God is perfect and infinite in understanding and knowledge. He 
is omnipresent, which is necessarily implied in his infinite, unlimited existence.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.ii-p34">God is <i>almighty</i>. He can do what he pleases, and nothing 
is impossible with him. And he must be absolutely and infinitely independent and 
all sufficient. All this is asserted in the scriptures, and it is easy to see they 
are essential to the character of God, who made and governs the world, and is to 
be trusted in all cases, and worshipped.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.ii-p35">God is <i>invisible</i>. Invisibility is ascribed to him in the 
scriptures, as essential and peculiar to him: And the meaning is not merely, that 
he is invisible as all pure spirits are, not to be seen by our bodily eyes; but 
he is not to be seen by any created mind, by direct, immediate intuition; nor can 
he ever be seen thus to all eternity; but only as he reveals and manifests himself,
<i><span lang="LA" id="iii.ii-p35.1">ad extra</span></i>, by his works, or some other medium, or exhibition. 
This seems to be asserted in the following words, “No man hath seen God at 
any time; the only begotten Son, which is in the bosom of the Father, he hath declared 
him.” It is to be observed, that the word <i>man</i>, is not in the original; but 
it is <i>none</i>, or <i>no one</i> hath seen God; and the assertion may be considered 
as extending to angels as well as men. St. Paul says, No man hath seen, nor can 
see God.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.ii-p36">God is <i>incomprehensible</i>, by all finite minds. This is as 
evident and certain, as it is that what is finite cannot reach unto and comprehend 
infinity. But a little portion can be known of God, compared with the whole of his 
existence: And none, among men or angels, can by searching find out God to perfection; 
though under the best possible advantages, and possessed of the greatest abilities 
to search; and though they exert all their powers and strength to the utmost, and 
wisely improve every advantage to get knowledge, without intermission, and without 
end. Though they should make the swiftest progress imaginable in the knowledge of 
God, they would still fall infinitely short of fully comprehending all that is in 
God, or even any one thing. For however great and extensive this knowledge may be, 
in itself <pb n="52" id="iii.ii-Page_52" />
considered; yet it is but finite, and therefore is infinitely less than the perfect, 
adequate knowledge of an infinite being. Creatures may have the true knowledge of 
God; they may know something of him, and what they know may be agreeable to the 
truth; but this is infinitely short of comprehending his being, or any of his attributes 
and perfections. This plain truth may well be improved to teach us modesty in our 
inquiries about God; and shew us the arrogancy and folly of those who refuse to 
believe any thing respecting the existence, character or works of God, which cannot 
be comprehended. Such, while they are valuing themselves, for their own reasoning 
abilities, are acting a most unreasonable part. How unreasonable are they who doubt 
of the being or any of the perfections of God, only because they cannot fully understand 
and comprehend how they can be. For if there be a God clothed with infinite perfection, 
he must be incomprehensible. They who will not believe in a God whose being and 
manner of existence are beyond their comprehension, must certainly have no true 
God; for what they reject, is essential to the true God; and were there nothing 
incomprehensible, it is certain there could be no God.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.ii-p37">The moral perfections of God are next to be considered; or what 
the scriptures say of his moral character. As this is of the greatest importance 
to be known, we may be sure it is very clearly discovered, and precisely stated 
in divine revelation, whatever mistakes men may make about it, and however they 
may differ in their sentiments concerning those divine attributes. We have therefore 
the greatest reason and encouragement to search the scriptures with attention and 
care, and upright and honest hearts, that we may find the knowledge of God, in this 
part of his character.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.ii-p38">The following general observations may be made concerning the 
moral perfections of God, before they are considered more particularly.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.ii-p39">1. The infinite excellence, beauty and glory of God, consist wholly 
in his moral perfections and character. Infinite greatness, understanding and power, 
without any rectitude, wisdom and goodness of heart, if this were possible, would 
not be desirable and amiable; but <pb n="53" id="iii.ii-Page_53" />worse than nothing, and infinitely 
dreadful. Therefore they who do not understand the true moral character of God, 
and discern the excellence and glory of it, have not the knowledge of God; his real 
amiableness and glory are hid from them. And this being true of all whose moral 
character is wholly evil, and who have hearts altogether opposed to the moral perfections 
of God, they are represented in the scriptures as not knowing God. “He that saith,
<i>I know him</i>, and keepeth not his commandments, is a liar, and the truth is 
not in him.”<note n="19" id="iii.ii-p39.1"><p class="normal" id="iii.ii-p40"><scripRef id="iii.ii-p40.1" passage="1 John ii. 4" parsed="|1John|2|4|0|0" osisRef="Bible:1John.2.4">1 John ii. 4</scripRef>.</p></note> “He that loveth not, knoweth not God; for 
God is love.”<note n="20" id="iii.ii-p40.2"><p class="normal" id="iii.ii-p41"><scripRef passage="1John 4:8" id="iii.ii-p41.1" parsed="|1John|4|8|0|0" osisRef="Bible:1John.4.8">Chap. iv. 8</scripRef>.</p></note></p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.ii-p42">2. The moral character and perfection of God consists in his
<span class="sc" id="iii.ii-p42.1">holiness</span>. Holiness comprehends all that belongs to his moral 
character, and does not consist in any particular attribute, distinct from any other 
moral perfection. The holiness of God is his goodness, wisdom, justice, truth and 
faithfulness, &amp;:c. It consists in these, and cannot be distinguished from them. 
Therefore they who have considered holiness as a distinct attribute of God, and 
have attempted to describe it as distinguished from goodness, wisdom, Sec. do not 
appear to have any distinct, clear ideas, and to be able to give any satisfactory 
or intelligible definition of it. It does not appear that the scriptures warrant 
any such distinction; but there the holiness of God means the goodness of his moral 
character in general. And we find that when it is applied to men, it denotes a virtuous 
moral character and conduct, and comprehends every thing morally good, even every 
branch of moral excellence. And should any one attempt to define the holiness of 
a man, as distinct from goodness, his love to God and his neighbour, his humility, 
righteousness and temperance, he not only would have no scripture warrant for it; 
but must run himself into the dark, and be altogether unintelligible to himself 
and others.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.ii-p43">3. The whole of true holiness, or the moral excellence and perfection 
of God, is comprehended in love, or goodness, by whatever names it may be called. 
Where there is no love or goodness of heart, there is nothing morally good; and 
where this love or goodness is, there <pb n="54" id="iii.ii-Page_54" />is every moral virtue and excellence, 
as necessarily involved and implied in it. Therefore infinite goodness is infinite 
moral perfection, and forms an absolutely perfect and infinitely excellent moral 
character. By this love and goodness is meant <i>good will</i>, with every affection 
necessarily implied in it; that universal benevolence which consists in a disposition 
to seek and promote the greatest possible general good and happiness, and all those 
affections and exercises, and that conduct in which this is expressed and acted 
out. What absolutely perfect and infinite benevolence and goodness implies, and 
contains in the nature of it; and that nothing can be added to it to form an infinitely 
excellent moral character, will be more particularly considered and evinced hereafter. 
But it is proper first to consider what evidence we have from the scriptures, that 
the divine, moral character, or the holiness of God, consists wholly in this.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.ii-p44">1. The holy law of God, which is not only the standard of holiness, 
or of moral excellence and perfection in the creature, but an expression and transcript 
of divine holiness, requires nothing but love or goodness; so that he who
<span class="sc" id="iii.ii-p44.1">loveth</span>, as the law of God requires, is perfectly conformed 
to the law, which is the same with being perfectly holy: And this is perfect conformity 
or likeness to God in his moral character; for holiness in the creature is 
the moral image of God: Therefore God. says to men, “Be ye holy; for I am 
holy.”</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.ii-p45">Jesus Christ has taught us that the holy law of God requires nothing 
but love, in the following remarkable words, “Thou shalt love the Lord thy God with 
all thy heart, and with all thy soul, and with all thy mind. This is the first and 
great commandment. And the second is like unto it. Thou shalt love thy neighbour 
as thyself. On these two commandments hang all the law and the prophets.” Agreeable 
to this St. Paul says, “Love is the fulfilling of the law.” Nothing can be more 
expressly asserted than this, viz. that love, exercised to a proper degree, and 
expressed and acted out in all proper ways, forms a perfect moral character; and 
therefore that the divine moral character consists wholly in this.</p>
<pb n="55" id="iii.ii-Page_55" />
<p class="normal" id="iii.ii-p46">2. The apostle John says repeatedly that <i>God is love</i>, and 
he that dwelleth in love dwelleth in God, and God in him. Here all the moral perfections 
of God are comprehended in <i>love</i>, and by this the whole of his moral character 
is expressed. If we know what love is, we know what God is; for God is love. And 
if we dwell in love, we are conformed to God, and he dwelleth in us, his moral image 
is formed in us by love.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.ii-p47">3. When Moses besought God to shew him his glory; in answer to 
this petition, God said, “I will make all my <span class="sc" id="iii.ii-p47.1">goodness</span> pass 
before thee.” And when he granted this petition, it is said, “The Lord descended 
in the cloud, and stood with him there, and proclaimed the name of the Lord. And 
the Lord passed by before him, and proclaimed, The Lord, the Lord God, merciful 
and gracious, long suffering, and abundant in goodness and truth.” The glory of 
God consists in his moral perfection and character: But when he proposes to shew 
this his glory to Moses, he mentions his <i>goodness</i>, and nothing else, “I will 
make all my <span class="sc" id="iii.ii-p47.2">goodness</span> to pass before thee.” <i>q.d</i>. I 
have no glory to show but my goodness; this is the whole of my moral beauty and 
excellence. And when it is said, “he proclaimed the <i>name</i> of the Lord;” it 
means that he proclaimed his character, and declared that in which his moral perfection 
and glory did consist. And here is nothing but goodness or love mentioned. Love 
in the highest, most resplendent and glorious exercises and manifestations of it, 
in the pardon and salvation of sinners. <span class="sc" id="iii.ii-p47.3">Truth</span> is indeed 
mentioned here; but not as any thing distinct from goodness or benevolence; but 
as that which is necessarily included in it. But this leads to a more particular 
consideration of the moral perfections of God, which are included in love or goodness.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.ii-p48">1. Infinite wisdom is a moral perfection of God. Wisdom consists 
in discerning, and proposing the highest and best end, and fixing on, and pursuing 
the most proper and best way and means, in order to accomplish it. Infinite wisdom 
does this with infinite ease, and without any possibility of the least error and 
mistake. It is certain that this wisdom is a moral excellence, and belongs to the 
heart, and therefore does not consist <pb n="56" id="iii.ii-Page_56" />in mere speculation, or that 
knowledge or understanding, which may be without any rectitude or goodness of disposition 
or heart. Satan, who has no moral goodness, has no wisdom. He does not discern and 
propose any good end, but the contrary; and is devising and pursuing methods to 
accomplish his evil designs. Therefore, however clear and right his speculations 
may be in some instances, and though he may be very subtil and cunning, he has no 
wisdom, and no true discerning in things of a moral nature; but all his proposals, 
designs and pursuits, are directly the reverse of wisdom. They are consummate folly 
and madness. Therefore the scriptures speak of wisdom, as a moral excellence; yea, 
as including all moral rectitude; and perfectly opposed to all folly or moral evil; 
and a wise and understanding heart, in the scriptures, means a moral excellence 
depending on the disposition of the heart, and not consisting in any knowledge and 
speculations which are consistent with a corrupt and evil heart. Of this every one 
who has attended to the Bible, must be sensible; it is therefore needless to produce 
passages here to prove it. This true wisdom is called <i>light</i>, in the scriptures; 
in which sense God is said to be light, and to dwell in light. “God is light, and 
in him is no darkness at all.”</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.ii-p49">Wisdom and goodness, or benevolence, are not to be considered 
as distinct, and the former as independent of the latter. Where there is no benevolence 
there is no wisdom; for where benevolence or goodness is not, there no good end 
is proposed and pursued, or discerned. It is benevolence alone that seeks the highest 
general good, and proposes and pursues the best end; and where this is not, the 
true good is not discerned, and therefore the best end is not proposed, sought, 
or perceived. This therefore gives or contains all the light and discerning there 
is in true wisdom. If we have a just idea of benevolence or goodness of heart, and 
know what that is, we have an idea of true wisdom, the latter being necessarily 
included in the former. This will be evident to every one who considers and understands 
what benevolence is, and what is true wisdom; so that no farther proof of this point 
will be needed. This is agreeable to what is said in the scriptures of <pb n="57" id="iii.ii-Page_57" />
benevolence and wisdom. There love or benevolence is represented as being or containing 
all that light and knowledge which is in true wisdom; and that where this love is 
not, there is not any degree of this light and discerning. “Every one that
<span class="sc" id="iii.ii-p49.1">loveth</span>, knoweth God. He that loveth not, knoweth not God. 
He that saith he is in the light, and hateth his brother, is in darkness even until 
now. He that loveth his brother, abideth in the light: But he that hateth his brother, 
is in darkness, and walketh in darkness.” Here love is said to be, or imply, all 
that light and discerning which is of a moral nature, in which true wisdom consists; 
therefore love is wisdom. Love is true light and discerning, and this is true wisdom. 
Love is the true knowledge of God, or implies it, and is essential to it. And in 
the knowledge of God true wisdom consists. “If thou incline thine ear unto wisdom, 
and apply thine heart to understanding—thou shalt then understand the fear of the 
Lord, and find the knowledge of God: For the Lord giveth wisdom.”<note n="21" id="iii.ii-p49.2"><p class="normal" id="iii.ii-p50"><scripRef id="iii.ii-p50.1" passage="Prov. ii. 2" parsed="|Prov|2|2|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Prov.2.2">Prov. ii. 
2</scripRef>, <scripRef passage="Prov 2:5" id="iii.ii-p50.2" parsed="|Prov|2|5|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Prov.2.5">5</scripRef>, <scripRef passage="Prov 2:6" id="iii.ii-p50.3" parsed="|Prov|2|6|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Prov.2.6">6</scripRef>.</p></note></p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.ii-p51">Moreover, the scriptures teach us that wisdom, considered as proposing 
and pursuing a good end by the best means, consists in love. There it is said, “The 
fear of the Lord is the beginning of wisdom. The fear of the Lord is the beginning 
of knowledge: But fools despise wisdom and instruction.” And unto man he said, “The 
fear of the Lord, that is wisdom, and to depart from evil, is understanding.” By 
the fear of the Lord, is evidently meant, true piety, or obedience to God, in keeping 
his commandments; which consists wholly in love, love to God and our neighbour. 
This, it is said, is true wisdom, and is the <i>beginning</i> of wisdom. There is 
no wisdom where there is no love to God, and wisdom begins in this, and this is 
wisdom itself. Therefore, according to the scriptures, love is wisdom and understanding. 
Agreeable to this, all true virtue and moral rectitude, which consists in love, 
is called wisdom, in the Proverbs of Solomon, and through the Bible; and the contrary 
is called folly: And the <pb n="58" id="iii.ii-Page_58" />former is called understanding and knowledge, 
the latter darkness and ignorance.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.ii-p52">Hence it appears, not only that wisdom is moral rectitude and 
excellence, and a moral perfection of God; but also that it is nothing more than 
benevolence or goodness, and is included in it; so that when it is said God is love, 
his wisdom is asserted, as well as his goodness; because love or goodness, is wisdom 
itself.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.ii-p53">2. Justice or righteousness belongs to the moral character of 
God. This denotes in general the perfect and infinite rectitude of his will, in 
opposition to all injustice or unrighteousness. The scriptures constantly ascribe 
this to God, as essential to the perfection and glory of his character, as every 
one must be sensible who is acquainted with the Bible. “He is the rock, his work 
is perfect: For all his ways are judgment: A God of truth, and without iniquity,
<span class="sc" id="iii.ii-p53.1">just and right is he</span>.” “The Lord is righteous in all his 
ways.”</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.ii-p54">Righteousness often has a very extensive meaning in the scriptures, 
and seems frequently to be used to express the whole of the moral character and 
glory of God, or his moral rectitude in general; as it is also often used to express 
the moral character of a man who is conformed to God, or true holiness. “Put on 
the new man, which after God is created in righteousness and true holiness.” Here 
righteousness and true holiness seem to mean the same thing, and the latter, <i>
true holiness</i>, is put as exegetical of the former; because <i>righteousness</i>, 
expresses the whole of moral rectitude, both in God and the creature. “Blessed are 
they who hunger and thirst after <i>righteousness</i>,” that is, true holiness. 
But the instances of righteousness being used in the scriptures in this extensive 
sense, as including all moral goodness, are too many to be particularly mentioned 
here. Every one who has read the Bible knows that the words <i>just</i> and <i>righteous</i> 
are commonly used to denote that moral character, rectitude and holiness, by which 
good or holy men are distinguished from others. To be righteous, is to be right 
according to the rule, the holy law of God, the standard of all moral rectitude; 
and therefore must include universal holiness.</p>
<pb n="59" id="iii.ii-Page_59" />
<p class="normal" id="iii.ii-p55">But righteousness and justice are sometimes used in the scriptures 
in a more limited sense, both when applied to God and to men; and to be just or 
righteous, is to be disposed to do no wrong to any, and actually to do none; but 
to give to every one, every thing to which he has a right, and may justly claim 
as his due, and is therefore opposed to doing wrong or injuring any being, by withholding 
or taking from him that to which he hath a right, which is called injustice, or 
unrighteousness. Justice and righteousness of a judge, and when ascribed to God, 
as such also denote, judging according to truth between opposing and contending 
parties, justifying the innocent and injured, espousing, vindicating and maintaining 
his cause; and condemning and punishing the guilty and injurious, according to his 
desert; especially when this is necessary to vindicate the character and cause of 
the injured in the best manner, and to make proper restitution for the injury done. 
Not to do this would be to pervert justice and judgment.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.ii-p56">This justice, righteousness or uprightness, is essential to a 
perfect moral character, and therefore must be included in infinite moral perfection. 
It is needless to him, who reads the Bible with attention, to say that justice, 
in this sense, is there constantly ascribed to God; and that he who overlooks this, 
or has wrong notions of it, must be ignorant of the moral character of God.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.ii-p57">It is important to observe here, that God, in the exercise of 
justice, or righteousness, has a proper regard to himself, and is disposed to maintain 
the rights of Deity, and properly to resent all injuries done to him. Therefore 
he requires his rational creatures to love him with all their hearts, because this 
is his due; and has annexed to his law a threatening of a punishment, which is the 
just desert of the transgression of it, or of any injury done to him. This regard 
to himself, and disposition to assert and maintain his rights and character, is 
expressed, when he styles himself a jealous God, who is jealous for his holy name;<note n="22" id="iii.ii-p57.1"><p class="normal" id="iii.ii-p58">
<scripRef id="iii.ii-p58.1" passage="Ezekiel xxxix. 25" parsed="|Ezek|39|25|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Ezek.39.25">Ezekiel xxxix. 25</scripRef>.</p></note> 
and will not give his glory to another, neither his praise to graven images:<note n="23" id="iii.ii-p58.2"><p class="normal" id="iii.ii-p59">
<scripRef id="iii.ii-p59.1" passage="Isaiah xliii. 8" parsed="|Isa|43|8|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Isa.43.8">Isaiah xliii. 8</scripRef>.</p></note> “For my name’s sake will I defer my anger, and for my praise <pb n="60" id="iii.ii-Page_60" />
will I refrain for thee, that I cut thee not off. For mine own sake, even for mine 
own sake will I do it; for how should my name be polluted? And I will not give my 
glory to another.”<note n="24" id="iii.ii-p59.2"><p class="normal" id="iii.ii-p60"><scripRef id="iii.ii-p60.1" passage="Isaiah xlviii. 9" parsed="|Isa|48|9|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Isa.48.9">Isaiah xlviii. 9</scripRef>, <scripRef passage="Isaiah 48:11" id="iii.ii-p60.2" parsed="|Isa|48|11|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Isa.48.11">11</scripRef>.</p></note> “God is jealous, and 
the Lord revengeth, the Lord will take vengeance on his adversaries, and he reserveth 
wrath for his enemies.”<note n="25" id="iii.ii-p60.3"><p class="normal" id="iii.ii-p61"><scripRef id="iii.ii-p61.1" passage="Nahum i. 3" parsed="|Nah|1|3|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Nah.1.3">Nahum i. 3</scripRef>.</p></note></p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.ii-p62">It belongs to God to vindicate his own rights, his name and character, 
and see that justice is done to himself; for there is no other being who can have 
the care of this, or can do it, or see that it is done. But he who is <i>most upright</i>, 
infinitely righteous, and can do no wrong, and sees what is right in all cases, 
without any possibility of mistake, is every way qualified to judge, decide and 
act in this matter, and it becomes him to do it; and not to regard his own rights, 
and do justice to himself, would be infinitely unjust and wrong. As God is infinitely 
the greatest, and the sum and perfection of all being, and his character, interest 
and rights, are of infinitely the greatest worth and importance; to disregard his 
rights, and injure him, is infinitely the highest instance of injustice that can 
be; and the exercise of justice and righteousness, in the first place, and chiefly, 
respects him; and were it possible for God to disregard his own character, and not 
vindicate and maintain his own rights, he would be infinitely far from being just 
and righteous; and this would be a greater instance of injustice, than every possible 
injury to all creatures, can be. Therefore when God is said to be <i>just</i>, it 
necessarily includes his being just to himself, so that he w ill do himself no wrong, 
but will regard and maintain his own rights, and claim and secure the honour due 
to his name: and if he be injured by any, he will see that complete restitution 
is made, whatever it may cost him who does the injury. And at the same time he is 
infinitely engaged to administer justice through all his dominions, and not to injure 
any one of his creatures in the least degree. “The Judge of all the earth will do 
right.”</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.ii-p63">Before we leave this head, it must be particularly observed, that 
justice or righteousness, whether taken in a more extensive, or in a confined sense, 
is nothing really 

<pb n="61" id="iii.ii-Page_61" />distinct from love or goodness; but is included in it, and essential 
to it, though it has been thus distinctly considered. For injustice is directly 
opposed to good will; and goodness will not injure any one. He therefore, who is 
perfectly good, must be perfectly just; and goodness always is, and always will 
be justice. And infinite benevolence or love disposes to maintain and vindicate 
the rights of all; to administer justice and judgment in all cases; to condemn and 
punish the injurious so far as is necessary to make compensation to the injured. 
For as universal goodness seeks the greatest general good, it can do no wrong; and 
is therefore opposed to all ill will, and every thing that is contrary to the rights 
of any being, and to the highest general good. Love, therefore, still appears to 
comprehend all moral rectitude and excellence; and justice or righteousness in the 
divine Being, is nothing but universal, infinite benevolence, considered with relation 
to particular objects, and as acted out in particular circumstances.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.ii-p64">3. Perfect truth and faithfulness are essential to the moral character 
of God, and included in his holiness. His declarations are all perfectly agreeable 
to the truth: and none can be deceived by believing what he says. Whatever he promises 
may be relied upon with the greatest safety; and all his predictions, promises and 
threatenings he punctually and completely accomplishes.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.ii-p65">And here again, it must be observed, that truth and faithfulness 
are not to be distinguished from goodness, as though there were any thing in them 
different from it, and not contained in it, and essential to it; for there is no 
foundation for this, and it would be contrary to the truth. He who is infinitely 
benevolent must be perfect and unchangeable in truth and faithfulness; for love 
or goodness is itself truth and faithfulness, acted out in that particular manner, 
and towards those particular objects in which it obtains this denomination. There 
can be no truth and fidelity, where there is no goodness; and where the latter is, 
there, in the same degree, is the former.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.ii-p66">We have new had some view of the moral character of God, or his 
holiness; and find it to consist in love or <pb n="62" id="iii.ii-Page_62" />goodness, wisdom, righteousness 
or justice, truth and faithfulness. And that all is comprehended in love or benevolence, 
there being not only nothing contrary to this; but nothing really distinct from 
it, and that is not essential to it: The whole being nothing but infinite goodness, 
in different views of it, and as it respects different objects; and on this account, 
and that we may better understand it, the scriptures speak of it by parts, and call 
the parts of this whole, by different names.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.ii-p67">But this very important and interesting subject requires yet further 
consideration; and it is hoped the following observations will not be useless; but 
tend to cast more light upon it.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.ii-p68">I. When it is said that the moral character of God, or his holiness, 
consists in <span class="sc" id="iii.ii-p68.1">love</span>, in which sense “God is love,” universal, 
infinite benevolence or good will is meant by love, and all that which this necessarily 
implies. This has been supposed, and taken for granted, in all that has been already 
said on this subject; but needs to be more particularly explained, and made evident. 
When God is said to be love, it is evident that the love of benevolence, or the 
goodness of God, is here meant from the context, where the meaning of the apostle 
is explained. When it is said, “God is love,” the words immediately following 
are these, “In this was manifested the love of God towards us, because that God 
sent his only begotten Son into the world , that we might live through him.
<span class="sc" id="iii.ii-p68.2">Herein is love</span>: Not that we loved God, but that he loved 
us, and sent his Son to be the propitiation for our sins.” Here the love of benevolence 
or good will only, is mentioned as that in which the love of God was manifested 
and acted out: Therefore this is the love here intended, when it is said, “God is 
love.” It is love of good will to enemies, to men in a state of rebellion against 
God; and therefore the most disinterested, generous love and goodness. This is the 
love and goodness spoken of by Christ, when he says, “God so loved the world, that 
he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, 
but have everlasting life.” This is by the angels, called <i>good will to men</i>. 
This is the highest instance of the most pure disinterested benevolence or <pb n="63" id="iii.ii-Page_63" />
goodness; in which God has made the clearest discovery of his infinite goodness, 
and so of all his moral perfections, that creatures have ever beheld. This benevolence 
has the highest good of being in general for its object: Being capable of life and 
happiness. It discerns what is the supreme, greatest good, and this it seeks and 
pursues with unerring wisdom; and being attended with omnipotence, all the infinite 
good, the proper object of infinite benevolence, which is discerned, willed and 
sought, must take place in the highest possible degree, without the least defect. 
This is universal benevolence; disinterested, unlimited, infinite goodness, which 
has the highest possible good of being in general for its object, that is, infinite 
good; which must infallibly take place, and be enjoyed forever.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.ii-p69">II. This love of benevolence does not exclude, but necessarily 
includes, that which is called love of complacence; for he who is good, benevolent 
and friendly, must delight in goodness. He will not only take pleasure in the exercise 
of goodness; but will be pleased with benevolence wherever it exists. Therefore 
a complacency and delight in holiness, or moral excellence, is always implied in 
holiness. God is therefore represented in the scriptures as delighting and taking 
pleasure in the upright, in them that fear him, and are truly holy, and delighting 
in the exercise of loving kindness, judgment and righteousness. But it ought to 
be remembered that love of complacency is not the primary or chief part of holy 
love; for holiness must exist as the object of complacency, in order to the existence 
of the latter. And what can this holiness be, which is the object ox complacency 
and the spring of holy delight, but the love of benevolence or goodness? This is 
the primary and most essential part; yea, the sum of holy love, which implies the 
love of complacency in its nature; the latter being a branch and emanation from 
the former. Therefore when we think and speak of holy love, benevolence should be 
the primary and chief idea in our minds, as being the sum of all, and implying the 
whole: For holy complacency, is complacency in benevolence and a benevolent complacency. 
And if we leave benevolence out of our idea of the love of complacency, we have 
no <pb n="64" id="iii.ii-Page_64" />idea of true holiness; nor understand the scriptures where they 
speak of holy love in God or creatures.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.ii-p70">It is true indeed, that moral excellence, or the love of benevolence 
and complacency, may be the object of benevolence as well as complacency, for the 
more excellent any being is. the greater is his importance and worth, and his interest 
so much more valuable; and indeed, the more existence he has; for excellence is 
real existence: Therefore there will not only be more complacence and delight in 
such a being; but he is more the object of benevolence, in wishing him well, prosperous 
and happy, and doing him good if he stands in need, and there is opportunity; and 
in being friendly to his existence, prosperity and happiness, and rejoicing in the 
same. But this is not the primary object of benevolence, but what may be called 
the secondary object, which appears from what has been said; for benevolence is 
good will to being, and seeks the greatest good of the whole; and therefore loves 
those who have no excellence, and wishes well even to enemies; but is exercised 
in a stronger degree, and a peculiar manner, towards those beings who are themselves 
benevolent, and friends to the general good; while at the same time they are the 
only objects of complacence and delight.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.ii-p71">III. Divine love or goodness is perfectly disinterested, in opposition 
to all self love, or selfishness. This is expressed by uprightness, or righteousness, 
and consists in it. Uprightness is ascribed to God in the scriptures, as essential 
to his character; yea, he is called “the most upright.”<note n="26" id="iii.ii-p71.1"><p class="normal" id="iii.ii-p72"><scripRef id="iii.ii-p72.1" passage="Isaiah xxvi. 7" parsed="|Isa|26|7|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Isa.26.7">Isaiah xxvi. 7</scripRef>.</p></note> 
That is, perfectly, infinitely, and unchangeably so. This is opposed to partiality, 
which consists in self love, and is selfishness itself. True goodness, or love, 
is in its own nature uprightness, or disinterested, in opposition to this self love, 
which is in its nature partiality and unrighteousness, and contains in it the essence 
and sum of all that which is opposed to true holiness, that is, all sin. Therefore 
we must exclude from the love in which the divine holiness consists, all that can 
be properly called self-love, all selfish, partial, <pb n="65" id="iii.ii-Page_65" />interested affection; 
and consider the holiness of God as infinitely opposed to all this.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.ii-p73">IV. God himself is the object of his own love and goodness. Or, 
in the exercise of his love he has respect and regard to Deity as well as to creatures. 
This is necessarily implied in perfect, universal, infinite benevolence, which includes 
impartial uprightness and righteousness; for it would be infinitely otherwise, and 
the most partial, unrighteous affection, if there were no regard paid to the infinite 
fountain and sum of all being and perfection. That which is friendly to the greatest 
universal good of existence, and is most pleased and delighted with the highest 
moral perfection, must regard the interest of the supreme Head of the universe, 
and delight in the most perfect beauty and excellence. And it hence follows that 
God is the chief and supreme object of his own love and regard; and he loves and 
regards himself infinitely more than the whole creation, and makes himself his highest 
and last end of all: and therefore has made all things for himself, as the scriptures 
assert. This has nothing of the nature of what is called self-love in creatures; 
but is directly and perfectly opposed to it. There is not the least partiality and 
selfishness in it; but the contrary, and is uprightness and righteousness itself, 
as has been shown; for if God did not love and regard himself, his rights and interest, 
according to his own existence, importance and excellence, he would not be just, 
impartial and upright. Impartial, disinterested benevolence and affection must pay 
the greatest regard to the greatest and best being; and therefore to suppose this 
is partiality and selfishness is most unreasonable, and a direct contradiction.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.ii-p74">This evident truth, which may be so easily demonstrated, ought 
to be impressed on our minds, and never forgotten; for if it be out of view, and 
wholly disregarded, we cannot have right conceptions of God, or understand the holy 
scriptures: and must be in darkness with respect to the most important doctrines 
of Christianity, and not know wherein true religion consists. Many, by making a 
mistake here, and considering the love of God as having no respect to himself, but 
wholly exercised towards <pb n="66" id="iii.ii-Page_66" />his creatures, in seeking their good and happiness 
only, have conceived of him as an almighty tool or servant, existing only for the 
sake of his creatures, and seeking nothing but their happiness; and hence have gone 
into a scheme of doctrines and religion, which is wholly selfish, and as contrary 
to the holy scriptures, as darkness is to light.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.ii-p75">Let it then be fixed and remembered, that God is
<span class="sc" id="iii.ii-p75.1">love</span>. He is infinite benevolence and goodness itself; and 
that he himself is the first, chief and last object of this love; so that he regards 
himself supremely and ultimately in all his works, and does every thing for himself, 
for his own sake: And that his wisdom and righteousness consist chiefly in this, 
as he would be neither just, faithful, nor wise, should he forget himself, and have 
no regard to his own rights and character, in any one thing that he does through 
all his dominions; and therefore to suppose he does, is to entertain the most dishonourable 
thought of him, which in the highest degree tarnishes and ruins his moral character. 
In the light of this truth, rightly understood, and cordially embraced, we shall 
have great assistance in finding the meaning of the holy scriptures; and determining 
what are the important doctrines there revealed, and see their consistence and beauty.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.ii-p76">V. Infinite benevolence or goodness, which seeks and promotes 
the greatest good of the whole, is infinitely opposed to all malevolence or ill 
will, which opposes all the good of being, and tends to universal evil; and must 
be infinitely displeased with it. This is just as evident and certain, as it is 
that he who loves and is friendly to any particular character, or desirable object, 
is displeased with the contrary, and hates it, to as great a degree as he loves 
and is pleased with the other. And this displeasure and hatred is implied in his 
love to the opposite object and pleasure in it; and is really the same affection 
acting towards opposite objects.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.ii-p77">He who is a friend to the greatest good, and therefore is pleased 
with such friendship, must be equally an enemy to ail who oppose this good, and 
proportionally displeased and angry with them. And this displeasure, hatred and 
anger, in a perfectly benevolent being, is nothing <pb n="67" id="iii.ii-Page_67" />in nature different 
from benevolence. It is nothing but goodness opposing its contrary; which it must 
do, or else cease to be love and goodness.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.ii-p78">Agreeable to this, the scriptures represent God, who is infinite 
love and goodness, to be in a proportionable degree displeased with all sin, which 
is in its nature opposition to benevolence, and to the general good. This is represented 
as the object of his implacable hatred; and as exciting his anger, indignation, 
wrath and fury. This is so far from leading us to conceive of any thing in God contrary 
to infinite love and goodness, or really distinct from it, that it is nothing more 
than benevolence acting according to its own nature towards objects that oppose 
it. For love of good is itself opposition to evil, and hatred of it, and benevolence 
must be displeased with ill will, and hate and oppose the same. Nor are these opposite 
or different affections; but the same affection, love, acting towards different 
objects.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.ii-p79">This displeasure, anger and wrath of God against sin, and the 
sinner, may therefore with propriety be called a just, benevolent, kind displeasure; 
which is the same with holy displeasure; all proceeding from love, and implied in 
it. Therefore, when we read in the scriptures of the divine displeasure, anger, 
wrath, &amp;c. we must not form the same idea of this, as we do of those passions, as 
they exist in man; for this would be to conceive of God as exercising affections 
and passions, contrary to love; and as very imperfect, changeable and miserable. 
We must exclude, in our minds, every thing that implies imperfection or change, 
and that is inconsistent with infinite benevolence and felicity; and understand 
those expressions in the scriptures, as meaning perfect, unchangeable opposition 
of God to everything in moral agents that is contrary to infinite benevolence or 
goodness; for which they are wholly blameable and answerable, and deserve to be 
punished. And these words are doubtless the best chosen, and most fit to convey 
to us this idea of infinite love, considered as opposed, injured and affronted by 
selfish creatures, and acting accordingly.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.ii-p80">VI. The infinite love and goodness of God, which has been described 
above, which is opposed to every <pb n="68" id="iii.ii-Page_68" />thing in creatures that is contrary 
to itself, and with which it is displeased, must be disposed to manifest this displeasure 
and opposition to sin, in all proper ways, and to punish the sinner according to 
his desert whenever this is necessary m order to show his displeasure, to assert 
and vindicate his own character, and secure and promote the greatest good of the 
whole. It is proper and desirable that infinite benevolence and goodness should 
be manifested and acted out, in all instances, where there is opportunity for it; 
and therefore in its opposition to sin. For if it does not appear how opposite the 
moral character of God is to all sin, it cannot be set in the most clear and advantageous 
light; but this cannot be done, if opposition to this character be not punished 
in any instance or way, according to its desert. Besides, when thus to punish is 
necessary, in order to support the character of God, and secure the general good; 
not to do it would be injustice to himself and the creation: Therefore to punish, 
in this case, is the proper and necessary exercise of justice and righteousness, 
which has been shewn is included in goodness, and is an exercise of the same. It 
is therefore evident, that God’s manifesting his displeasure and anger with the 
creature who is an enemy to his goodness, is not only consistent with infinite benevolence, 
but an expression and exercise of love and goodness itself; and it would be contrary 
to the nature and dictates of the most perfect goodness not to punish. And it may 
be added, such punishment is not the least evidence of want of benevolence to the 
creature who is punished. When a judge orders a criminal who is guilty of treason 
against his king and country, to be put to death, he does nothing contrary to perfect 
benevolence and goodness, but this very conduct is an expression of it, and dictated 
by goodness itself; for he herein acts as a friend to his king and country; and 
not to inflict this punishment would be unfriendly, and contrary to true goodness. 
Nor does he manifest any want of benevolence to the criminal, or of a proper regard 
for his life and welfare, by punishing him according to his deserts, when the public 
and general good requires it.</p>
<pb n="69" id="iii.ii-Page_69" />
<p class="normal" id="iii.ii-p81">The disposition of the Most High to inflict punishment, and his 
actually inflicting evil on his creatures, as a testimony of his displeasure at 
sin, and to vindicate his own character, is often called <i>vengeance</i> in the 
scriptures; and is represented by his taking or executing vengeance, and being avenged 
on his enemies. And in this view he is frequently called. The mighty and terrible 
God, with whom is <i>terrible majesty</i>, &amp;c. If God were not disposed to punish 
his creatures for their rebellion against him, and never did inflict evil on any 
for their sin, vengeance or vindictive justice could not he ascribed to him, nor 
would there be any thing terrible in his character; which would be an imperfection, 
and inconsistent with infinite benevolence or goodness, as has been shown. Therefore 
they who form notions of a love and goodness, in which there is no wrath and vengeance 
to punish enemies, nor any terrible majesty; and ascribe such love to God, have 
conceptions of his moral character which are essentially wrong, and very dishonourable 
to him.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.ii-p82">VII. It appears from what has been said, and from reason, as well 
as scripture, that the moral perfection of God, or the divine holiness, consists 
in one most simple, pure, uncompounded, unchangeable act; though to accommodate 
it to our imperfect way of conceiving, it be divided into parts, and a number of 
attributes, and called by different names, as it is exercised in different views 
and towards various and opposite objects.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.ii-p83">Benevolence or goodness is mercy, grace, compassion, patience, 
long suffering, &amp;c. And the same benevolence is wisdom, justice, truth, faithfulness, 
complacence, displeasure, anger and wrath, in different views, and as it respects 
different objects.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.ii-p84">VIII. Absolute, uncontrollable sovereignty may be considered as 
included in the moral character of God. This is the same with omnipotent love or 
goodness; benevolence doing whatever it pleases, infinitely above any control or 
obligation to any other being. Omnipotence is indeed a natural perfection; but benevolence, 
clothed with omnipotence, or doing what it pleases, is the essence of God’s moral 
perfection, and if we leave out the idea of this sovereignty, we shall have not 
only an imperfect, <pb n="70" id="iii.ii-Page_70" />but a wrong view of divine benevolence. Indeed, 
if we should conceive of divine sovereignty, as some seem to have done, as consisting 
in God’s doing what he will, merely because he will, and without any possible reason 
why he wills thus, rather than the contrary, this would be so far from a moral perfection, 
that it would be no perfection; but infinitely undesirable and unbecoming the Most 
High, representing him rather as an almighty despot and tyrant, than an infinitely 
wise and good being. Though God does what he pleases, and is infinitely above all 
obligation or control by creatures; yet he has a good reason for all his determinations, 
and always wills that which is most wise, and the dictate of infinite rectitude 
and goodness. It is most agreeable, desirable, and of infinite importance, that 
infinite goodness and wisdom should be sovereign goodness, that is, above all possible 
control, or obligation to creatures, which is inconsistent with its doing what it 
pleases, or with God’s “fulfilling all the good pleasure of his goodness.” All the 
friends of God who can confide in his goodness, wisdom and righteousness, must be 
pleased with this sovereignty, and rejoice that he is above all control, doing whatever 
he pleases, through all his dominions, and “working all things according to the 
council of his own will:” And the idea and acknowledgment of the sovereignty of 
God attends all their views and pleasing sense of his moral character. This is the 
same with rejoicing that the Lord God omnipotent reigneth, which all good beings 
are represented to do; for to be under the least control, or involuntary obligation, 
is inconsistent with reigning, which consists in doing whatsoever he pleases. When 
it is said, however, that God reigns above all obligation to any, which is inconsistent 
with his doing what he pleases, it is not meant that he can in no instance be under 
obligation to his creatures. He may enter into voluntary obligation, by promise 
and covenant; for it may be truly said, that what God has promised he will do, he 
is obliged to fulfil. But all must be sensible that this is not in the least inconsistent 
with the most perfect sovereignty, as it has been now described.</p>
<pb n="71" id="iii.ii-Page_71" />
<p class="normal" id="iii.ii-p85">IX. God is independently, infinitely and unchangeably happy. And 
this may be considered as included in his moral perfection and character, and depending 
upon it; for his happiness is not properly a natural, but a moral good, and consists 
hi moral exercises and enjoyment. If God were not benevolence or love, he would 
not be happy; but his infinite greatness, understanding, &amp;c. would render him infinitely 
miserable; therefore his moral character is essential to his felicity, and he is 
blessed forever, because he is unchangeably holy: And his happiness is a holy happiness. 
This attribute of God is essential to complete his infinitely glorious character; 
and is most pleasing and delightful to all his true friends; and their benevolence 
or good will to God is gratified and expressed in seeing and rejoicing in his infinite, 
unchangeable, independent felicity and blessedness; and adding their hearty amen 
to it, as St. Paul did when he spoke of it. “Who is over all, God blessed forever, 
Amen.”</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.ii-p86">Here it must however be observed, that when it is said God is
<i>independently</i> happy, it is not meant that he takes no pleasure in his works 
of creation and providence, or delight in the holiness and happiness of his creatures; 
so that he would be as completely happy, were there no holy and happy creatures 
and no creation; for this is contrary to the scriptures, which represent God as 
pleased with his own works, and creating all things for his own pleasure; and as 
delighting in his holy creatures, and in exercising loving kindness, judgment and 
righteousness in the earth. So that it is not strictly true, that creatures add 
nothing to the enjoyment or happiness of God, even his essential happiness; and 
that he would have been as completely blessed forever, as he really is, had there 
been no creatures, which has been too often asserted, even in solemn addresses to 
God. Though the creation, with all its attendants and eternal consequences, be essential 
to the infinite happiness of God, and he could not have been so happy without it, 
this does not suppose him in the least dependent on creatures for his happiness, 
or for any thing else; for the creation is absolutely, perfectly, and in all respects, 
dependent on him; being only an emanation from his <pb n="72" id="iii.ii-Page_72" />infinite fulness; 
and he is as independent of his creatures, as if they never had existed, and he 
took no pleasure in them. Nor is this inconsistent with the eternal, unchangeable 
happiness of God; for he from eternity perfectly enjoyed the creation, and every 
event that will take place to all eternity, without any change or succession of 
past, present and future, with respect to himself.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.ii-p87">The scriptures, indeed, speak of God as repenting that he had 
made man, and being grieved at his heart, which, when spoken of man, denote uneasiness 
and pain; but these expressions concerning God cannot reasonably be understood as 
meaning any such thing; and only denote that the great wickedness and misery of 
man are so contrary and displeasing to the holiness and goodness of God, that were 
he a man, or his goodness as limited and imperfect as that of man, it would be very 
grievous to him, and make him repent that man ever existed. And these words are 
doubtless wisely chosen, as best suited to convey this idea to us, and gives us 
a proper sense of the exceeding wickedness and misery of man in the sight of God; 
even so as to render his existence infinitely worse than nothing, should things 
take their natural course, and not be checked and overruled by infinite power and 
wisdom. If God speak to men, he must speak after the manner of men.</p>
<h2 id="iii.ii-p87.1">REFLECTIONS.</h2>
<p class="normal" id="iii.ii-p88"><span class="sc" id="iii.ii-p88.1">From</span> the view we have now taken of the 
evidence of the existence of God, and his character and perfection, we may infer 
the following things.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.ii-p89">1. What is meant by seeing God, or a true sensibility of his being 
and character. God is infinite power, knowledge, goodness, wisdom, justice and righteousness, 
unchangeable, eternal, every where present. To see God, is to have some proper discerning 
and sense of all these: and so as to make suitable impressions on the mind. And 
as the human mind is infinitely unequal to an adequate, comprehensive view of God; 
and cannot, at once, see all that it is capable of seeing, we view this infinite 
whole, by parts, and may sometimes attend to infinite power, more particularly, 
or to wisdom <pb n="73" id="iii.ii-Page_73" />or goodness, and have a more affecting, pleasing sense 
of those, than of other perfections, though not excluding them. A discerning sensibility 
of any thing in God, is seeing him.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.ii-p90">II. We hence learn what a foundation and source there is in the 
being and perfections of God, for the complete and eternal happiness of those who 
know and love him. In God there is every thing that is agreeable and desirable to 
an infinite degree, and no possible blemish or defect; nothing that can be in the 
least disagreeable, to a mind of a right taste and disposition. His whole character 
is superlatively beautiful, bright and excellent, and it is impossible it should 
be properly discerned and understood, without giving the most noble and highest 
kind of enjoyment! And perfect discerning and love of this infinitely excellent 
and glorious being, accompanied with an assurance of his love and favour, must be 
the most perfect and highest kind of happiness of which we are capable, or can have 
any conception. In this view, the truth and propriety of our Saviour’s words appear 
in a striking light. “And this is life eternal, that they might know thee the only 
true God, and Jesus Christ, whom thou hast sent.” And as this infinitely excellent 
and glorious object is unchangeable, eternal and infinite, he whose happiness consists 
in the knowledge and enjoyment of him, must have not only a perfect and unfailing, 
but also an <i>increasing</i> happiness; for as the object of his knowledge and 
love is infinite, there is a foundation for an endless progression or increase of 
knowledge and love, which is the same with an endless increase of enjoyment and 
happiness.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.ii-p91">III. We hence learn the amazing folly, wickedness and misery of 
those who are displeased with the divine character and real enemies to it. This 
is true of all those who dislike the laws of God, and are unwilling to be under 
his government, and obey him; for the government and laws of God are all like himself, 
and an expression of his own character.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.ii-p92">There can be no greater crime, than direct opposition to God, 
and hatred of him, disaffection to his existence 
<pb n="74" id="iii.ii-Page_74" />and character; for this must be criminal in proportion to the greatness 
of God, his importance to being in general, and the excellence of his character, 
and his authority over us, and his goodness exercised towards us. But he is infinitely 
great, and therefore his existence is of infinite worth and importance, and he is 
as excellent as he is great, is infinite love and friendship to being in general; 
and his authority over us is great in proportion to his greatness and perfection, 
our inferiority to him, and dependence upon him. And what is the just and certain 
consequence from this? If it be not that disaffection and opposition to him is
<i>infinitely</i> criminal, that is, a crime of unlimited infinite magnitude; then 
it cannot be proved to be any crime at all. This is certain, if no reason can be 
given, or argument offered to prove that opposition to God, and rebellion against 
him, is wrong and criminal, which does not equally prove that the crime is infinitely 
great. Any one will doubtless be convinced of this, if he will attend to the point 
so much as to make a trial.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.ii-p93">The misery of such must be great. If infinite perfection and excellence 
give them no pleasure, but uneasiness and pain, they are of course shut out of all 
true happiness, and they have no object that can afford them any enjoyment, suited 
to their natural capacity and strong desires; and therefore must, in all their pursuits 
of happiness, meet with continual, vexatious disappointment, which must constantly 
render them very unhappy. And if they persist in this disaffection to God, and opposition 
to him, and so fall under the just and proper manifestations of his displeasure, 
and are punished in suffering evil answerable to their crimes, they must necessarily 
be miserable beyond all conception, and without any end!</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.ii-p94">The folly of this is beyond all expression, and the greatest that 
can be. To turn away from the fountain of all good and perfection, and renounce 
the only object of true enjoyment and happiness, and seek it in a way in which it 
is not to be found, but issues in complete and endless misery: what instance of 
folly can be great like this! No wonder the scriptures call such
<span class="sc" id="iii.ii-p94.1">fools</span>, in an emphatical sense, as if this was the sum of 
all folly, <pb n="75" id="iii.ii-Page_75" />and there were no <i>fools</i> but these. These, in the 
highest sense, and in the most striking manner, “call evil good, and good evil; 
put darkness for light, and light for darkness; bitter for sweet, and sweet for 
bitter.” The scriptures speak of such in the following language. “Be astonished, 
O ye heavens, at this, and be ye horribly afraid: For my people have committed two 
evils: They have forsaken me, the fountain of living waters, and hewed them out 
cisterns, broken cisterns, that can hold no water. For my people are <i>foolish</i>, 
they have not known me, they are sottish children, and have no understanding: They 
are wise to do evil; but to do good they have no knowledge.”</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.ii-p95">IV. This subject leads us to reflect upon the very criminal blindness 
and great delusion of those who say in their hearts, “There is no God.” The scriptures 
teach us there are such; and surely we must see the justice and propriety of calling 
them fools. “The fool hath said in his heart, there is no God.” That there should 
be any such of the human race, is very shocking and deplorable; but it is more so 
to have it asserted by God, that this is true of all mankind in their natural state! 
That all are here declared to be such fools naturally, is certain from the context, 
which is quoted by St. Paul, and applied to all men.<note n="27" id="iii.ii-p95.1"><p class="normal" id="iii.ii-p96"><scripRef id="iii.ii-p96.1" passage="Ps. xiv. 3" parsed="|Ps|14|3|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Ps.14.3">Ps. xiv. 3</scripRef>.—<scripRef passage="Rom 3:9,12" id="iii.ii-p96.2" parsed="|Rom|3|9|0|0;|Rom|3|12|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Rom.3.9 Bible:Rom.3.12">Rom. 
iii. 9, 12</scripRef>.</p></note> 
What awful darkness and delusion must that be, in which they are, who, in the midst 
of the clearest light shining around them, do shut their eyes so as not to see the 
most evident and important truth, and to be quite blind to the most excellent, charming, 
glorious character! And that the heart of man should be thus stupid and blind, even 
when there is a rational conviction, and acknowledgment of the truth, is yet more 
shocking. This is the blindness of the heart, spoken of by St. Paul.<note n="28" id="iii.ii-p96.3"><p class="normal" id="iii.ii-p97"><scripRef id="iii.ii-p97.1" passage="Eph. iv. 18" parsed="|Eph|4|18|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Eph.4.18">Eph. 
iv. 18</scripRef>.</p></note> “Having the understanding darkened, being alienated from the life 
of God, through the ignorance that is in them, because of the blindness of their 
heart.” When the light that is in men is, through the moral disorders of the mind, 
turned into such darkness, how great is that darkness!</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.ii-p98">And this blindness and delusion must be criminal in proportion 
to the clear and abundant evidence of the truth, and the infinite importance and 
excellence of the <pb n="76" id="iii.ii-Page_76" />object, which this darkness hides from the mind; 
for it is the <i>blindness of the heart</i>, and therefore a moral, voluntary blindness, 
and cannot be distinguished from disaffection and real opposition of the heart to 
the being and character of God; and consequently the whole of it is nothing but 
sin. In this light, therefore, the scriptures every where represent this sort of 
blindness and delusion, which originates from the heart, and consists essentially 
in the moral disorders and depravity of the mind. All sin is indeed moral darkness 
and delusion, it is opposed to all moral truth, and is in its own nature a sort 
of Atheism, as it does in all the exercises of it deny the God that is above. It 
is therefore so far from being unaccountable that the scriptures should assert, 
that they whose hearts are wholly under the dominion of sin, say in their hearts 
there is no God, that the reason of it may be easily seen; and it is most evident 
and certain, that it cannot be otherwise, and to assert the contrary is a very gross 
and palpable contradiction. When all the feelings and exercises of the heart are 
as if there were no pod, or are opposed to his being and moral character, then the 
heart says, there is no God: Therefore they who have no true virtue, no love to 
God, are in the scriptures said not to know God; but to be alienated from the life 
of God, and without God in the world.<note n="29" id="iii.ii-p98.1"><p class="normal" id="iii.ii-p99"><scripRef id="iii.ii-p99.1" passage="Eph. ii. 12" parsed="|Eph|2|12|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Eph.2.12">Eph. ii. 12</scripRef>.—<scripRef passage="Eph 4:18" id="iii.ii-p99.2" parsed="|Eph|4|18|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Eph.4.18">iv. 
18</scripRef>.</p></note></p>

</div2>

<div2 title="Chapter III. Concerning the Unity of God; and the Trinity." prev="iii.ii" next="iii.iv" id="iii.iii">

<h2 id="iii.iii-p0.1">CHAP. III.</h2>
<h3 id="iii.iii-p0.2">CONCERNING THE UNITY OF GOD; AND THE TRINITY.</h3>
<p class="normal" id="iii.iii-p1">THAT there is but <span class="sc" id="iii.iii-p1.1">one God</span>, the scriptures 
every where assert; and this is agreeable to reason, and the works of creation and 
providence, which we behold. And the contrary supposition is most absurd, and undesirable, 
and really involves in it infinite evil. God must be a self existent being; which 
is the same with existing necessarily: But necessary existence must be infinite, 
as has been shewn. Therefore there can be but one <pb n="77" id="iii.iii-Page_77" />
first cause, who exists necessarily, and without beginning, for there can be but 
one infinite being. To suppose another, or a second, necessarily excludes the first, 
and to suppose the first, necessarily excludes the second, and any other infinite 
being. The same is evident from the consideration of the divine perfections: God 
is infinite power, infinite wisdom: But there cannot be two or more infinite wisdoms, 
&amp;c. because this is a contradiction. Infinite power is all the power there is, or 
can be, and is clearly inconsistent with another power distinct from that, which 
is also infinite. Moreover, if we make the impossible supposition that there are 
two or more infinite beings, they must be perfectly alike in all respects, or not. 
If not perfectly alike and without any difference in any respect, then one or the 
other must be imperfect; for absolutely infinite perfection admits of no variation, 
or difference: so that if any two beings differ in any respect, they cannot both 
be absolutely perfect; therefore cannot both be God. But if they are perfectly alike 
in every respect and every thing, then they are perfectly one and the same; and 
the supposition destroys itself, being a direct contradiction. And there can be 
no possible need of more than one God; and therefore were this possible, it is not 
desirable. There can really be no more existence than one infinite being, or any 
addition to infinite perfection and excellence; therefore no more can be desired; 
and nothing can be effected or done, more than he can do. In a word, he is <i>all-sufficient</i>, 
and no addition can be made to this, or even conceived.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.iii-p2">Yea, it is so far from being desirable, that there should be more 
gods than one, were it possible, that it is most undesirable, and would be the greatest 
evil. Such a supposition would only tend to perplex the pious mind, not knowing 
which of the gods he did worship, or what god to love and adore, or in which to 
put his trust. There have been those in the christian world, who have supposed two 
gods, a good and an evil one. The former the author of all good, the latter of all 
evil. Were it so, there must be infinite variance and opposition between these beings, 
and it is impossible that the votaries of either should be happy. Such a belief, 
as the acknowledgment <pb n="78" id="iii.iii-Page_78" />of more gods than one, is even worse than atheism 
itself; or rather is the worst sort of atheism; for such are really without any 
God.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.iii-p3">The scriptures teach us that there are <i>three</i> in this one 
God. Not three Gods; for this would be a contradiction; but that this infinite being 
exists in such a manner, as to be three distinct subsistencies or persons, and yet 
but one God. The most express declaration of this is by the apostle John. He says, 
“There are three that bear record in heaven, the Father, the Word, and the Holy 
Ghost: And these are One.”<note n="30" id="iii.iii-p3.1"><p class="normal" id="iii.iii-p4"><scripRef id="iii.iii-p4.1" passage="1 John v. 7" parsed="|1John|5|7|0|0" osisRef="Bible:1John.5.7">1 John v. 7</scripRef>.</p></note> This is also clearly asserted 
by Christ himself, when he directs his disciples to baptize all the proselytes to 
Christianity, “In the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost.”<note n="31" id="iii.iii-p4.2"><p class="normal" id="iii.iii-p5">
<scripRef id="iii.iii-p5.1" passage="Matthew xxviii. 19" parsed="|Matt|28|19|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Matt.28.19">Matthew xxviii. 19</scripRef>.</p></note> Baptism being a covenant transaction between God and 
the creature, and a solemn act of worship, it would be idolatry to administer it 
in any other name but that of the only true God. Therefore these words warrant us 
to believe that the Father, the Son, and the holy Ghost, are God, and but one God, 
agreeable to what is said by the apostle John in the above cited passage, the Word 
and the Son meaning the same. This is also expressed by the apostle Paul, in his 
benediction or prayer, with which he concludes his second epistle to the Corinthians. “The grace of our Lord Jesus Christ, and the love of God, and the communion of the 
Holy Ghost, be with you all. Amen.”<note n="32" id="iii.iii-p5.2"><p class="normal" id="iii.iii-p6"><scripRef id="iii.iii-p6.1" passage="2 Corinthians xiii. 14" parsed="|2Cor|13|14|0|0" osisRef="Bible:2Cor.13.14">2 Corinthians xiii. 14</scripRef>.</p></note> Hereby 
God must be meant, the Father, mentioned in the above cited passages; and this is 
therefore parallel to them. And divinity is ascribed to each of these; by his blessing 
in each of these names, and making them the object of prayer.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.iii-p7">There are many passages in the Old Testament, which are agreeable 
to those in the New Testament, which have been mentioned, and represent a plurality 
or Trinity, as comprehended in the One true God: The following are some of them. 
It is remarkable that the Hebrew word, which is generally used for God, and is so 
translated, is commonly put in the plural, and not in the singular number. There 
is an instance of it the first time it is used in the Bible. “In the beginning God 
<pb n="79" id="iii.iii-Page_79" />created the heaven and the earth.” And agreeable to this it is said, 
“Remember thy Creators.”<note n="33" id="iii.iii-p7.1"><p class="normal" id="iii.iii-p8"><scripRef id="iii.iii-p8.1" passage="Eccles. xii." parsed="|Eccl|12|0|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Eccl.12">Eccles. xii.</scripRef> i. 2.</p></note> It is translated Creator, 
but the Hebrew word is plural. And the reason and propriety of it is discovered 
and best explained, by observing that a plurality, or Trinity, is included in the 
Creator of all things: for it is expressly and repeatedly asserted, that Jesus Christ 
created the world and all things in it. “In the beginning was the Word, and the 
Word was with God, and the Word was God. All things were made by him; and without 
him was not any thing made, that was made.”<note n="34" id="iii.iii-p8.2"><p class="normal" id="iii.iii-p9"><scripRef id="iii.iii-p9.1" passage="John i. 1" parsed="|John|1|1|0|0" osisRef="Bible:John.1.1">John i. 1</scripRef>, <scripRef passage="John 1:3" id="iii.iii-p9.2" parsed="|John|1|3|0|0" osisRef="Bible:John.1.3">3</scripRef>.</p></note> “For by him 
(the Son of God) were all things created, that are in heaven, and that are in earth.”<note n="35" id="iii.iii-p9.3"><p class="normal" id="iii.iii-p10">
<scripRef id="iii.iii-p10.1" passage="Col. i. 16" parsed="|Col|1|16|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Col.1.16">Col. i. 16</scripRef>.</p></note> And creation is also ascribed to the Holy Spirit. “And the Spirit 
of God moved upon the face of the waters.”<note n="36" id="iii.iii-p10.2"><p class="normal" id="iii.iii-p11"><scripRef id="iii.iii-p11.1" passage="Gen. i. 2" parsed="|Gen|1|2|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Gen.1.2">Gen. i. 2</scripRef>.</p></note> “By his Spirit 
he hath garnished the heavens. The Spirit of God hath made me.”<note n="37" id="iii.iii-p11.2"><p class="normal" id="iii.iii-p12"><scripRef id="iii.iii-p12.1" passage="Job xxvi. 13" parsed="|Job|26|13|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Job.26.13">Job xxvi. 
13</scripRef>.—<scripRef passage="Job 33:4" id="iii.iii-p12.2" parsed="|Job|33|4|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Job.33.4">xxxiii. 4</scripRef>.</p></note></p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.iii-p13">Agreeable to this, God uses words in the plural number, when he 
is about to create man, and speaks as if there were a plurality of persons to do 
it. “And God said. Let us make man, in our image, after <span class="sc" id="iii.iii-p13.1">our</span> 
likeness.”<note n="38" id="iii.iii-p13.2"><p class="normal" id="iii.iii-p14"><scripRef id="iii.iii-p14.1" passage="Gen. i. 26" parsed="|Gen|1|26|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Gen.1.26">Gen. i. 26</scripRef>.</p></note> And this form of speech is repeatedly used. 
“And the Lord God said. Behold, the man is become like <span class="sc" id="iii.iii-p14.2">one of us</span>. 
And the Lord said—Let <span class="sc" id="iii.iii-p14.3">us</span> go down, and there confound their 
language.”<note n="39" id="iii.iii-p14.4"><p class="normal" id="iii.iii-p15">Gen.iii.22.—<scripRef passage="Gen 11:6,7" id="iii.iii-p15.1" parsed="|Gen|11|6|11|7" osisRef="Bible:Gen.11.6-Gen.11.7">xi. 6, 7</scripRef>.</p></note></p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.iii-p16">There is a remarkable passage in the prophecy of Isaiah, which 
represents a plurality, or three in Jehovah, or the Lord of Hosts. The Seraphims 
“cried one unto another, and said, Holy, holy, holy, is the Lord of Hosts. Also 
I heard the voice of the Lord, saying, Whom shall I send, and who will go for us?”<note n="40" id="iii.iii-p16.1"><p class="normal" id="iii.iii-p17"><scripRef passage="Gen 6:3,8" id="iii.iii-p17.1" parsed="|Gen|6|3|0|0;|Gen|6|8|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Gen.6.3 Bible:Gen.6.8">
Chap. vi. 3, 8</scripRef>.</p></note> The plurality is here expressed by the plural 
pronoun, us. “Who will go for <span class="sc" id="iii.iii-p17.2">us</span>?” And the Trinity is expressed 
by using the word <i>holy</i> three times successively; of which there is no instance 
of the kind in the Bible, when a single person, which is in no sense plural, is 
addressed. There is an instance of the same, indeed, when the same Being is addressed 
by the living creatures which John saw and heard. “And they rest not day and night, <pb n="80" id="iii.iii-Page_80" />
saying, Holy, holy, holy Lord God Almighty, which was, and is, and is to come.”<note n="41" id="iii.iii-p17.3"><p class="normal" id="iii.iii-p18">
<scripRef id="iii.iii-p18.1" passage="Rev. iv. 8" parsed="|Rev|4|8|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Rev.4.8">Rev. iv. 8</scripRef>.</p></note> But that a plurality and a Trinity, comprehended in Jehovah, 
is designed to be expressed here by these words, is confirmed and made certain, 
by the reference which is made to this passage, in the New Testament. All will grant 
that he who is called the Father, in the New Testament, when joined with the Son 
or Word, and the Holy Ghost, is intended or included in the word Jehovah, or the 
Lord of Hosts, in this passage in Isaiah. And the apostle John, referring to it, 
says, “These things said Isaiah, when he saw his glory, and spake of him.” That 
is, of Jesus Christ.<note n="42" id="iii.iii-p18.2"><p class="normal" id="iii.iii-p19"><scripRef id="iii.iii-p19.1" passage="John xii. 41" parsed="|John|12|41|0|0" osisRef="Bible:John.12.41">John xii. 41</scripRef>.</p></note> 
The apostle Paul, when he quotes some of the words of this same passage in Isaiah, 
says, “Well spake the Holy Ghost, by Isaiah the Prophet, unto our fathers.”<note n="43" id="iii.iii-p19.2"><p class="normal" id="iii.iii-p20">
<scripRef id="iii.iii-p20.1" passage="Acts xxviii. 25" parsed="|Acts|28|25|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Acts.28.25">Acts xxviii. 25</scripRef>.</p></note> 
So that the glory of Jehovah was the glory of the Son, or Jesus Christ; and what 
was spoken of the Lord of Hosts, was spoken of Christ the Son of God. And what the 
Lord of Hosts said by Isaiah, the Holy Ghost said. It is hence certain, that these 
three, the Father, the Son, or the Word, and the Holy Ghost, into whose name christians 
are baptized, and in whose name the Apostles blessed, and who bear record in heaven, 
were included in the vision which Isaiah had of the Lord of Hosts. And who that 
attends to this scriptural view of the case, can doubt when it is said. Who will 
go for us? the plurality of the Father, Son and Holy Ghost is intended; and that 
when the Seraphim adored the Lord of Hosts, and cried, saying, Holy, holy, holy, 
there is reference to those three.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.iii-p21">From the passages of scripture which have been now mentioned, 
to prove there is a plurality or Trinity in the one true God, it is also proved 
that the Word, the Son of God, the Lord Jesus Christ, is God, and as really, and 
as much included in the Deity, in Jehovah, as is the Father: And that this is equally 
true of the Holy Ghost. But the evidence of the real divinity of Jesus Christ, will 
appear yet more clear and strong, by examining the scripture more particularly on 
this point. But as this will be done in a more proper place in a following section, <pb n="81" id="iii.iii-Page_81" />
it is omitted here. And the divinity of the Holy Ghost will now be more particularly 
considered.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.iii-p22">In addition to the evidence of this, from the scriptures, which 
have been produced above, a number of other passages of scripture will now be mentioned, 
from which it appears, that the Holy Ghost is God, and included in the Godhead.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.iii-p23">Christ says, “Except a man be born of the Spirit, he cannot 
see the kingdom of God. What is born of the Spirit, is spirit.”<note n="44" id="iii.iii-p23.1"><p class="normal" id="iii.iii-p24"><scripRef id="iii.iii-p24.1" passage="John iii. 5" parsed="|John|3|5|0|0" osisRef="Bible:John.3.5">John iii. 
5</scripRef>, <scripRef passage="John 3:6" id="iii.iii-p24.2" parsed="|John|3|6|0|0" osisRef="Bible:John.3.6">6</scripRef>.</p></note> And the apostle Paul says, “christians are saved by the washing of 
regeneration, and renewing of the Holy Ghost.”<note n="45" id="iii.iii-p24.3"><p class="normal" id="iii.iii-p25"><scripRef id="iii.iii-p25.1" passage="Titus iii. 5" parsed="|Titus|3|5|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Titus.3.5">Titus iii. 5</scripRef>.</p></note> 
The apostle John speaks often of the same change, and renovation, common to all 
christians, as being <i>born of God</i>.<note n="46" id="iii.iii-p25.2"><p class="normal" id="iii.iii-p26"><scripRef id="iii.iii-p26.1" passage="John i. 13" parsed="|John|1|13|0|0" osisRef="Bible:John.1.13">John i. 13</scripRef>—<scripRef passage="1JOhn 3:9" id="iii.iii-p26.2" parsed="|1John|3|9|0|0" osisRef="Bible:1John.3.9">1 
John iii. 9</scripRef>. <scripRef passage="1John 4:7" id="iii.iii-p26.3" parsed="|1John|4|7|0|0" osisRef="Bible:1John.4.7">iv. 7</scripRef>. <scripRef passage="1John 5:1,4,18" id="iii.iii-p26.4" parsed="|1John|5|1|0|0;|1John|5|4|0|0;|1John|5|18|0|0" osisRef="Bible:1John.5.1 Bible:1John.5.4 Bible:1John.5.18">
v. 1, 4, 18</scripRef>.</p></note> The inference is, that the Holy Spirit is God; since 
to be born of the Spirit, and to be born of God, is precisely the same thing. This 
renovation, by which men are born of God, and born of the Spirit, is called in scripture 
the new creature, or new creation. And it is indeed a greater work than the creation 
of the world; therefore the Spirit who thus renews men must be God.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.iii-p27">“Why hath Satan filled thine heart to lie to the Holy Ghost? Thou 
hast not lied unto men, but unto God.”<note n="47" id="iii.iii-p27.1"><p class="normal" id="iii.iii-p28"><scripRef id="iii.iii-p28.1" passage="Acts v. 3" parsed="|Acts|5|3|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Acts.5.3">Acts v. 3</scripRef>, <scripRef passage="Acts 5:4" id="iii.iii-p28.2" parsed="|Acts|5|4|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Acts.5.4">4</scripRef>.</p></note> 
Here God and the Holy Ghost are synonymous, and mean the same thing; as much as 
if it had been said, thou hast lied unto God the Holy Ghost. “<i>The things of God</i> 
knoweth no man. But the natural man receiveth not <i>the things of the Spirit of 
God</i>, neither can he know them.”<note n="48" id="iii.iii-p28.3"><p class="normal" id="iii.iii-p29"><scripRef id="iii.iii-p29.1" passage="1 Cor. ii. 11" parsed="|1Cor|2|11|0|0" osisRef="Bible:1Cor.2.11">1 Cor. ii. 11</scripRef>, <scripRef passage="1 Cor. 2:4" id="iii.iii-p29.2" parsed="|1Cor|2|4|0|0" osisRef="Bible:1Cor.2.4">4</scripRef>.</p></note> From these two 
sentences compared, it appears that the things of God, and the things of the Spirit 
of God, express the same thing. But if the things of the Spirit of God are the things 
of God, does it not follow that the Spirit of God is God? “All scripture is given 
by inspiration of God. Holy men spake as they were moved by the Holy Ghost.”<note n="49" id="iii.iii-p29.3"><p class="normal" id="iii.iii-p30">
<scripRef id="iii.iii-p30.1" passage="2 Tim. iii. 16" parsed="|2Tim|3|16|0|0" osisRef="Bible:2Tim.3.16">2 Tim. iii. 16</scripRef>—<scripRef passage="1Pet 1:21" id="iii.iii-p30.2" parsed="|1Pet|1|21|0|0" osisRef="Bible:1Pet.1.21">1 Pet. i. 21</scripRef>.</p></note> To 
be inspired by God, and moved by the Holy Ghost, is the same; therefore the Holy 
Ghost is God.<note n="50" id="iii.iii-p30.3"><p class="normal" id="iii.iii-p31">Many more passages of scripture, of the same tenor, might be 
mentioned, were it needful. They may be seen in a small book entitled, “The Catholic 
Doctrine of a Trinity.” By <span class="sc" id="iii.iii-p31.1">William Jones</span>.</p></note></p>
<pb n="82" id="iii.iii-Page_82" />
<p class="normal" id="iii.iii-p32">These three are spoken of, or addressed, in the scriptures, in 
such terms as are used to denote a distinct personality, such as <i>I, thou, he</i>, 
or <i>him</i>. Thus the Father speaks of himself, and the Son; and thus the Son 
speaks to the Father, and of him, and of the Holy Spirit; of which there are many 
instances, which must have been observed by those who read the Bible.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.iii-p33">It is thought that the use of the above mentioned personal epithets, 
is a sufficient warrant to distinguish the <span class="sc" id="iii.iii-p33.1">three</span> in the 
divine Trinity, by the word <i>person</i>. But it must be carefully observed, that 
when this word is applied to the Father, Son, and Holy Ghost, as three distinct 
persons, it does not import the same distinction which is expressed by it when applied 
to men. It means nothing inconsistent with the highest perfection, or with these
<span class="sc" id="iii.iii-p33.2">three</span> being really and most perfectly <span class="sc" id="iii.iii-p33.3">one</span> 
God. Nor is it pretended that this word, when used in this instance, can be so defined 
as to give any clear and adequate idea of a subject so mysterious and infinitely 
incomprehensible. They who object to the word <i>person</i>, and will not use it 
because not applicable to the <span class="sc" id="iii.iii-p33.4">three</span> who are
<span class="sc" id="iii.iii-p33.5">one</span>, may doubtless, with equal reason, object to any word 
which can be used, even the word Trinity, or three, which the apostle John uses, 
and to the personal words so often mentioned in scripture. However, if they who 
object to the word <i>person</i>, will allow that, according to the scripture, the 
one only true God does subsist in such a manner, and so infinitely above our comprehension, 
that there are <span class="sc" id="iii.iii-p33.6">three</span>, viz. Father, Son, and Holy Ghost, 
in this <span class="sc" id="iii.iii-p33.7">one jehovah</span>; and that this distinction and manner 
of existence is peculiar and essential to the infinite eternal Being as the most 
perfect, happy and glorious mode of existence, independent of any divine operations
<i><span lang="LA" id="iii.iii-p33.8">ad extra</span></i>, and the proper foundation of these: If they 
will grant this, it is presumed none will contend with them about the word <i>person</i>.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.iii-p34">It is acknowledged, that this is incomprehensible by us, we not 
being able to form any precise or adequate idea of three persons in one God, but 
as there is no inconsistence or contradiction in this, our not being able to comprehend 
it, is no reason why we should not believe <pb n="83" id="iii.iii-Page_83" />it, when it is revealed; 
for if we will not believe any thing respecting God, which we cannot comprehend 
and is therefore above our reason, we shall not believe there is a God. If there 
be a God, he does exist without beginning or succession; but this is as much above 
our comprehension, as that he subsists in three persons; and we cannot have a more 
clear understanding of the former, than of the latter. God, who is infinitely great; 
and infinitely above us, exists in a manner infinitely above our conception: And 
if we will not believe what God has revealed of himself, because it is above our 
reason, and incomprehensible by us, we shall act a most unreasonable part; for reason 
teaches us, that God is incomprehensible in more respects than one; and in how many 
we know not. God has been pleased, for wise reasons, to reveal one instance of this, 
which we otherwise could not have known; and there can be no reason against believing 
it: and therefore to reject it, is most unreasonable and absurd.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.iii-p35">There may be innumerable truths respecting this infinitely incomprehensible 
Being, which would be as much above the reach of our understanding and reason, as 
this is, were they revealed; for but a very small portion is yet known of him. This 
truth, respecting a Trinity of persons in the one God, is revealed, because it was 
necessary to be known and believed, in order to understand the gospel, revealing 
a way for the salvation of sinners, in which each of those <i>Three</i> are concerned, 
in different respects and views, and distinct from each other: For had there not 
been this distinction of persons in God, there would have been no foundation or 
sufficiency in him for the exercise of mercy, in the recovery of apostate man. In 
this view, the doctrine of the Trinity, one God subsisting in three persons, appears 
to be an important and essential doctrine of christianity.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.iii-p36">There have been many attempts to explain this doctrine, and shew 
the particular manner of the distinct subsistence of the three persons in the divine 
Trinity; but these have often been so far from giving any light and satisfaction 
on the subject, that they have only darkened counsel, by words without knowledge; 
and rather given <pb n="84" id="iii.iii-Page_84" />advantage to the opposers of the doctrine, and increased 
their prejudices. Therefore nothing of this kind will be attempted here. It may 
however be observed, that this manner of subsistence in three persons, though incomprehensible 
to us, may be essential to the infinitely perfect Being, and that otherwise he would 
not be absolutely perfect, all-sufficient, and infinitely blessed. Have we not reason 
to conclude that this distinction of <i>three</i> in <i>one</i>, is that in which 
the most perfect and happy society consists, in which love and friendship is exercised 
to the highest perfection, and with infinite enjoyment, and felicity? And that the 
most perfect and happy society of creatures, united together forever, in the kingdom 
of God, in the strongest, sweetest love and friendship, is an emanation from this 
infinite <span class="sc" id="iii.iii-p36.1">three one</span>, as the fountain and pattern of all happy 
society and friendship; and the highest possible resemblance and imitation of it? 
This idea seems to be suggested, if not necessarily implied, in what Christ says 
in his prayer to the Father. “That they all may be one. as thou, Father, art in 
me, and I in thee; that they also may be one in us. That they may be one, even as 
we are one. I in them, and thou in me, that they may be made perfect in one. That 
the love wherewith thou hast loved me, may be in them, and I in them.”</p>

</div2>

<div2 title="Chapter IV. On the Decrees of God." prev="iii.iii" next="iii.v" id="iii.iv">

<h2 id="iii.iv-p0.1">CHAP. IV.</h2>
<h3 id="iii.iv-p0.2">ON THE DECREES OF GOD.</h3>
<p class="normal" id="iii.iv-p1">HAVING considered what God is, the next inquiry will be concerning 
the divine operations and works. And in these are included the <i>decrees</i>, which 
are first to be considered; as they are the foundation and origin of all his exertions 
and works, <i><span lang="LA" id="iii.iv-p1.1">ad extra</span></i>, in creation and providence: For
<i>God worketh all things after the council of his own will</i>. Indeed, every thing 
which is properly an effect, has its foundation in the purpose or decree of God, 
as its original cause, without which it could not <pb n="85" id="iii.iv-Page_85" />have taken place. 
And every such effect is fixed and made sure of existence by the divine decree, 
and infallibly connected with it.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.iv-p2">The assembly of Divines, in their shorter catechism, have given 
a concise definition of the decrees of God, which is both rational and agreeable 
to the holy scriptures, viz. “The decrees of God are his eternal purpose, according 
to the council of his own will, whereby for his own glory he hath foreordained whatsoever 
comes to pass.” And in their confession of faith, in words a little different, “God 
from all eternity did, by the most wise and holy council of his own will, freely 
and unchangeably ordain whatsoever comes to pass.”</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.iv-p3">The decrees of God must be from eternity, and not in time. He 
who exists without beginning, absolutely independent, omnipotent, infinite in understanding 
and wisdom, must know what is wisest and best, or what is most agreeable to him 
with respect to all possible effects or events; and therefore must determine what 
should actually take place, and what should not. Such determination or decree is, 
in such a sense, essential to the divine existence, that the former must be coeval 
with the latter, and is necessarily implied in it. Besides, if any of the purposes 
or decrees of God be in time, or later than his existence, he must be <i>changeable</i>, 
by having new determinations, new views and designs, which he had not before; which 
is inconsistent with his necessary existence, his infinity, and absolute perfection, 
all which are essential to God, as has been proved.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.iv-p4">Therefore in scripture the purpose or decrees of God are said 
to be eternal, “Known unto God are all his works, from the beginning of the world,” 
or <i>from eternity</i>, as it should have been rendered. If God’s knowing all his 
works from eternity does not mean his purpose concerning them, it necessarily implies 
this; for how could he know what he would do, if he had no will or purpose to do? 
“According to the <i>eternal</i> purpose, which he purposed in Christ Jesus our 
Lord.”<note n="51" id="iii.iv-p4.1"><p class="normal" id="iii.iv-p5"><scripRef id="iii.iv-p5.1" passage="Eph. iii. 11" parsed="|Eph|3|11|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Eph.3.11">Eph. iii. 11</scripRef>. See also <scripRef id="iii.iv-p5.2" passage="Eph. i. 4" parsed="|Eph|1|4|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Eph.1.4">Eph. i. 4</scripRef>. <scripRef passage="1Cor 2:7" id="iii.iv-p5.3" parsed="|1Cor|2|7|0|0" osisRef="Bible:1Cor.2.7">
1 Cor. ii. 7</scripRef>. <scripRef passage="2Tim 1:9" id="iii.iv-p5.4" parsed="|2Tim|1|9|0|0" osisRef="Bible:2Tim.1.9">2 Tim. i. 9</scripRef>.</p></note></p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.iv-p6">Though God be <i>sovereign</i> in his decrees, and all his operations; 
that is, he has determined every thing and every event <i>just as he pleased</i>, 
being infinitely above all <pb n="86" id="iii.iv-Page_86" />control by the will or power of any one; 
and under no obligation to any other being; yet they are not <i>arbitrary</i>, that 
is, determined and fixed without any reason why he should purpose and decree as 
he has done, rather than the contrary, or otherwise: But they are all infinitely 
wise and good, or the dictates of the most perfect wisdom. For if God decree or 
act, he must decree and act like himself, an infinitely wise Being. Infinite wisdom 
is able or sufficient to form the wisest and best plan of creation and providence, 
of a world or system, be it ever so large and complicated, and however many creatures, 
things and events, it may comprehend; and though it include innumerable existencies 
and events without any end. Such a plan is therefore formed and fixed upon by the 
divine decrees, which is of all other possible plans the wisest and the best: For 
if it were otherwise it would be so far disagreeable, defective, unwise, and wrong. 
The scripture therefore ascribes <i>wisdom</i> to God in all his works, by which 
his wise purpose and decrees are brought into effect. “O Lord, how manifold 
are thy works! In <i>wisdom</i> hast thou made them all.”<note n="52" id="iii.iv-p6.1"><p class="normal" id="iii.iv-p7"><scripRef id="iii.iv-p7.1" passage="Psalm civ. 24" parsed="|Ps|104|24|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Ps.104.24">Psalm civ. 24</scripRef>.</p></note> 
“O the depth of the riches both of the wisdom and knowledge of God! How unsearchable 
are his judgments, and his ways past finding out!”<note n="53" id="iii.iv-p7.2"><p class="normal" id="iii.iv-p8"><scripRef id="iii.iv-p8.1" passage="Rom. xi. 31" parsed="|Rom|11|31|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Rom.11.31">Rom. xi. 31</scripRef>.</p></note></p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.iv-p9">The decrees of God are unchangeable; they are fixed from eternity, 
and cannot be altered, in any degree, or with respect to any thing, event, or circumstance. 
“The counsel of the Lord standeth forever, the thoughts of his heart to all generations.”<note n="54" id="iii.iv-p9.1"><p class="normal" id="iii.iv-p10">
<scripRef id="iii.iv-p10.1" passage="Psalm xxxiii. 11" parsed="|Ps|33|11|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Ps.33.11">Psalm xxxiii. 11</scripRef>.</p></note> “He is in one mind, and who can turn him?”<note n="55" id="iii.iv-p10.2"><p class="normal" id="iii.iv-p11"><scripRef id="iii.iv-p11.1" passage="Job xxiii. 13" parsed="|Job|23|13|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Job.23.13">Job xxiii. 
13</scripRef>.</p></note> That the divine purpose is unalterable, is as evident and certain as 
that God is unchangeable; for alteration of God’s design or decree is a change in 
God: And this necessarily supposes imperfection. And it is unspeakably undesirable 
and dreadful to suppose, that the infinitely wise and good purpose and decree of 
God, as all his decrees are, should be capable of any possible change or alteration; 
so as to fail of the most exact and perfect execution. And the more stable and fixed 
the infinitely wise decrees of God are, and the farther from all possible change, 
the <pb n="87" id="iii.iv-Page_87" />more agreeable, and the greater ground of joy, are they to every 
one who is a friend of wisdom.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.iv-p12">It may be farther observed, concerning the decrees of God, that 
they extend to every thing, and every event, though ever so small, compared with 
others, and every the most minute circumstance that takes place, or will exist to 
eternity. For every one of these are necessary parts of the most wise and perfect 
plan; otherwise they could have no existence in it. And if one of these had been 
left out of the divine plan, it would have been so far less perfect, and really 
defective. It is not to be supposed that of any two possible existences, events, 
or circumstances of existence, there should be no difference in any respect; so 
that one could not be preferred to the other, by infinite wisdom, as better and 
more suited to answer the end proposed, than the other; though we, or finite discerning, 
may not be able to perceive any difference: Therefore infinite wisdom discerns and 
fixes upon that which is preferable and best, in every instance. No two proposed 
or possible objects, events or circumstances, being perfectly alike or equal in 
the view of omniscience, there is ground of choice and preference; so that the divine 
determination respecting the actual existence of all these, and their taking place 
in all respects exactly as they do, or will, is, in every instance, <i>most wise</i>: 
and no thing, event, or circumstance, would be in any other respect otherwise consistent 
with infinite wisdom.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.iv-p13">Jesus Christ teaches us that God’s providence and care extend 
to the smallest things, and most minute circumstances, when he says to his disciples, “Are not five sparrows sold for two farthings? and not one of them is forgotten 
before God, or shall fall on the ground, without your heavenly Father: But the
<i>very hairs</i> of your head are <i>all</i> numbered.”</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.iv-p14">It may be of some importance to observe here, that there is a 
distinction and difference between the decrees of God, and his foreknowledge, as 
the words are commonly used. Divine foreknowledge is God’s foreseeing future existence 
and events, and knowing from eternity what would take place in all futurity, to 
eternity, or without end. This foreknowledge is not only to be distinguished from 
the decree; but must be considered as, <pb n="88" id="iii.iv-Page_88" />in order of nature, consequent 
upon the determination and purpose of God, and dependent upon it. For the futurition 
or futurity of all things depends upon the decrees of God; by these every created 
existence, and every event, with all their circumstances, are fixed and made certain; 
and in consequence of their being thus: decreed, they are the objects of foreknowledge; 
for they could not be known to be future, unless they were so; and they were made 
so by the divine decree, and nothing else. If we may so speak, God foreknew all 
things, that were to come to pass, by knowing his own purpose and decrees, by which 
their existence was made certain. Had God decreed nothing respecting future existences, 
by creation and providence, there could have been no foreknowledge of any thing 
whatsoever. Hence the decrees of God may be certainly inferred from his foreknowledge; 
for the former must be as extensive as the latter; and nothing can be foreknown 
or seen to have a future existence, the future existence of which has not been made 
certain by a divine decree.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.iv-p15">All future existences, events and actions, must have a cause of 
their futurition, or there must be a reason why they are future, or certainly to 
take place, rather than not. This cause must be the divine decree determining their 
future existence, or it must be in the future existences themselves; for there is 
no other possible supposition. But the future existences could not be the cause 
of their own futurition; for this supposes them to exist as a cause, and to have 
influence, before they have any existence, even from eternity. And if they may be 
the cause of their own futurition, or become future of themselves, then they might 
actually exist of themselves; for by becoming future, their existence is made certain 
and necessary; therefore that which makes them certainly future, is really the cause 
of their existence. This therefore can be nothing but the divine decree, determining 
their future existence, without which nothing could be future, consequently nothing 
could be known to be future. They therefore who deny the doctrine of God’s decrees, 
and yet acknowledge the omniscience of God, and that all future events were known 
to him from eternity, are really inconsistent: for if the <pb n="89" id="iii.iv-Page_89" />world, or 
any creature, or any event, could be certainly future, without being made so by 
God, it can actually exist without him: for the existence of it is certain and necessary, 
and it cannot but exist, when once it becomes certainly future.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.iv-p16">Therefore, because the foreknowledge of God does necessarily imply 
and involve his decrees, the former is sometimes put for the latter, in the inspired 
writings. The following are instances of it. “Him, being delivered by the determinate 
counsel and <i>foreknowledge</i> of God, ye have taken, and by wicked hands have 
crucified and slain.”<note n="56" id="iii.iv-p16.1"><p class="normal" id="iii.iv-p17"><scripRef id="iii.iv-p17.1" passage="Acts ii. 23" parsed="|Acts|2|23|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Acts.2.23">Acts ii. 23</scripRef>.</p></note> 
“For whom he did <i>foreknow</i>, he also did predestinate to be conformed to the 
image of his Son.”<note n="57" id="iii.iv-p17.2"><p class="normal" id="iii.iv-p18"><scripRef id="iii.iv-p18.1" passage="Rom. viii. 29" parsed="|Rom|8|29|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Rom.8.29">Rom. viii. 29</scripRef>.</p></note> 
“God hath not cast away his people whom he <i>foreknew</i>.”<note n="58" id="iii.iv-p18.2"><p class="normal" id="iii.iv-p19"><scripRef id="iii.iv-p19.1" passage="Rom. xi. 2" parsed="|Rom|11|2|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Rom.11.2">Rom. xi. 2</scripRef>.</p></note> 
“Elect according to the foreknowledge of God the Father.”<note n="59" id="iii.iv-p19.2"><p class="normal" id="iii.iv-p20"><scripRef id="iii.iv-p20.1" passage="1 Peter i. 2" parsed="|1Pet|1|2|0|0" osisRef="Bible:1Pet.1.2">1 Peter i. 2</scripRef>.</p></note></p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.iv-p21">As the decrees of God are most wise, this necessarily supposes 
some end in view, and that which is best, the most excellent, important, and desirable 
that can be; for wisdom consists in proposing and pursuing such an end, in ways 
and by means in the best manner adapted to accomplish that end. When no end is in 
view to be accomplished by any purpose or work, if this can be, there is no wisdom; 
and if there be an end proposed and pursued, if this be not the best that can be 
proposed and effected, the purpose and pursuit is not wisdom but folly. And if the 
end proposed be the highest and best that can be; yet if the means fixed upon to 
accomplish that end, be not in all respects the best suited to accomplish the end 
proposed, this must be a defect of wisdom. Therefore infinite wisdom discerns without 
a possibility of mistake, what is the best end, most worthy to be set up and pursued, 
and fixes on this end; and discerns and determines the best means by which this 
end shall in the best manner be answered. And this determination is the same with 
the decrees of God, and involves or comprehends every thing that comes to pass, 
every event, great and small, with every circumstance, be it ever so minute; and 
fixes them all; unerring wisdom being exercised with respect to them all; <pb n="90" id="iii.iv-Page_90" />
so that to make the least alteration in any thing, event, or circumstance, would 
render the whole plan less perfect and wise. “The work of God is <i>perfect</i>. 
Whatsoever God doth, it shall be forever: Nothing can be put to it, nor any thing 
taken from it.” That which is <i>perfect</i> is not capable of the least alteration, 
without being rendered imperfect and defective. This is true of the infinitely wise 
plan of the divine operations, and all future events, which was formed by the eternal 
purpose and decrees of God.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.iv-p22">If it be inquired, What that best, most important and desirable 
end can be, which must be proposed by infinite wisdom? The answer must be, that 
God himself, or that which respects him, is the end of his decrees and works. When 
the divine plan of operations was laid, there was nothing but God existing, or to 
be set up, or regarded as an end; and how could future existence be made an ultimate 
end with him, in proposing and causing it to exist? And when it does exist, it is 
infinitely less considerable and respectable than God; and as the dust in the balance; 
yea, as nothing, in comparison with Him. It would therefore be contrary to reason, 
and therefore contrary to infinite wisdom, to make creatures or the creation, considered 
as something distinct from God, the object of supreme respect in God’s designs and 
works, and not God himself, whose existence is infinitely greater, more important 
and excellent, and who is the sum of all being. Wisdom must have supreme respect 
to him in every design, and in every operation, as the first and the last, and all 
in all. Which is the same as to say, God makes himself his end in all his purposes 
and operations.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.iv-p23">Divine revelation confirms this, in which God speaks of himself 
as the <i>first</i> and the <i>last</i>, the <i>beginning</i> and the <i>ending</i>, 
by which he represents himself as the first cause and supreme or last end of all 
things. And this is confirmed by the following passages, “For of him, and through 
him, and <i>to him</i>, are all things.<note n="60" id="iii.iv-p23.1"><p class="normal" id="iii.iv-p24"><scripRef id="iii.iv-p24.1" passage="Rom. xi. 36" parsed="|Rom|11|36|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Rom.11.36">Rom. xi. 36</scripRef>.</p></note> 
For by him were all things created, that are in heaven, and that are in earth, visible 
and invisible, whether they be thrones, or dominions, or principalities, or powers: 
All things <pb n="91" id="iii.iv-Page_91" />were created by him, and <i>for him</i>.”<note n="61" id="iii.iv-p24.2"><p class="normal" id="iii.iv-p25"><scripRef id="iii.iv-p25.1" passage="Col. i. 16" parsed="|Col|1|16|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Col.1.16">Col. i. 
16</scripRef>.</p></note> Agreeable to this it is said, “The Lord hath made all things <i>for himself</i>.”<note n="62" id="iii.iv-p25.2"><p class="normal" id="iii.iv-p26">
<scripRef id="iii.iv-p26.1" passage="Prov. xvi. 4" parsed="|Prov|16|4|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Prov.16.4">Prov. xvi. 4</scripRef>.</p></note></p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.iv-p27">God makes himself his end in his decrees and works, in being pleased 
with the exercise and expression, exhibition and display of his own infinite perfection 
and excellence: And determining to do this in the best manner, and to the highest 
possible degree, in his works of creation and providence. This exhibition, display 
or manifestation, is in divine revelation called <i>the glory of God</i>; and is 
there abundantly represented as the supreme end of all God’s designs and works, 
which any one properly attentive to the Bible must have observed: It is therefore 
thought needless to illustrate this by a particular attention to those passages 
of scripture by which it is evident. This exhibition and display of the divine perfections, 
necessarily implies and involves, as essential to it, the communication of his own 
holiness and happiness to the greatest possible degree, which consists in effecting 
or producing the greatest possible moral excellence and felicity in his creation, 
or by his works. This consists hi the highest, the greatest possible good or happiness 
of creatures, whose capacities, circumstances, and their number, and all other things, 
circumstances and events, are contrived and adapted in the best manner to answer 
this end.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.iv-p28">The moral excellence and perfection of God consists in
<span class="sc" id="iii.iv-p28.1">love</span>, or goodness, which has been proved in a former chapter. 
This infinite <i>love</i> of an infinite Being, is infinite felicity. This consists 
in his infinite regard to himself as the fountain and sum of all being; and ills 
pleasure and delight in himself, in his own infinite excellence and perfection; 
and in the highest possible exercise, exhibition and display of his infinite fulness, 
perfection and glory. And his pleasure in the latter, so as to make it the supreme 
and ultimate end of all his works, necessarily involves and supposes his pleasure 
and delight in the happiness of his creatures. If he be pleased with the greatest 
possible exercise, communication, and exhibition of his goodness, he must be pleased <pb n="92" id="iii.iv-Page_92" />
with the happiness of creatures, and the greatest possible happiness of the creation, 
because the former so involves the latter that they cannot be separated; and may 
be considered as one and the same thing; and doubtless are but one in the view of 
the all comprehending mind; though we, whose conceptions are so imperfect and partial, 
are apt to conceive of the glory of God, and the good of the creature, as two distinct 
things, and different ends to be answered, in God’s designs and works.<note n="63" id="iii.iv-p28.2"><p class="normal" id="iii.iv-p29">The 
point has been more particularly, and with greater care and exactness, considered 
and examined in the light of both reason and revelation, by the late President
<span class="sc" id="iii.iv-p29.1">Edwards</span>, than by any other author, in his <i>Dissertation 
concerning the End for which God created the world</i>. The reader, who desires 
to see this subject more fully explained and explored, must be referred to that 
ingenious, elaborate performance.</p></note></p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.iv-p30">Thus whatsoever comes to pass from the beginning of time to eternity 
is foreordained, and fixed from eternity by the infinitely wise counsel and unchangeable 
purpose of God. He being infinite in understanding, power, wisdom and goodness, 
must perfectly know, what was the wisest and best plan of creation and providence, 
of operations and events, which includes everything desirable and good, and excludes 
whatever is not so; and he must fix upon this plan, without any possible error, 
and determine to prosecute it; for if any thing be left undetermined and uncertain, 
even the most minute existence, event, or circumstance and appendage of any existence 
or event, it must be owing to a defect in wisdom and goodness, or in power to execute. 
No truth ever was, or can be more demonstrably certain than this; and none can be 
more agreeable to wisdom and goodness, or more important. If a man be to contrive 
and make any machine or building, the end which it is to answer must be in view, 
and fixed; and the plan of his operation must be laid, including every thing that 
is to come into the composition, so as in the best manner to answer the end designed. 
And the more skill and wisdom the workman has, the more clear and perfect will be 
his idea and view of the whole plan, and of every part, even the most minute, which 
is included in it; and the more fixed and determined he will be to prosecute this 
plan, without the least variation from it. <pb n="93" id="iii.iv-Page_93" />And if he have skill and 
wisdom sufficient to lay a perfect plan of operation, without the least mistake 
or error, he will be esteemed and prized above all others of less skill; and the 
more certain and fixed his plan of operation is, and the farther he is from a disposition 
to make any alteration, or a possibility of being impeded in his work or unable 
to execute his design, according to his present purpose, the more agreeable it will 
be to all who are interested in his work which he is to execute; and to all who 
have the least spark of wisdom and goodness; and that in proportion to the excellence 
and importance of the design.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.iv-p31">What a source of unspeakable satisfaction and joy must it then 
be to all the children of wisdom, that the most High, omnipotent, infinitely wise, 
just and good, has laid a plan to express and exhibit his own character; which therefore 
must be wise and good, like himself; and which comprehends and fixes every thing, 
and all events, from the greatest to the least, from the first to the last; and 
which is absolutely perfect, infinitely wise, and comprehends all possible good; 
so that not the least thing, event, or the smallest appendage and circumstance, 
can be altered, left out, or added, without rendering it less desirable, excellent 
and perfect! And is it possible that any one who is not unfriendly to infinite wisdom 
and goodness, and to the most absolute perfection and excellence, should have the 
least objection to this? Yea, will he not highly approve of it, and make it the 
ground of his chief comfort and joy? And is not this infinitely preferable to a 
world and series of events, if this were possible, fixed by blind fate, or existing 
and taking place by mere, undesigning chance? Most certainly this demonstrable truth,
<i>that God has, by the infinitely wise counsel of his own will, from eternity foreordained 
whatsoever comes to pass</i>, is infinitely more desirable than any other supposition 
whatever, were it possible; and is a foundation on which a pious mind, a true friend 
to God, may rest with the greatest security and satisfaction. And if he should give 
this up, what support and comfort could he have? Where could he fly for refuge from 
evil? He must fall into the most awful darkness, and horror.</p>
<pb n="94" id="iii.iv-Page_94" />
<p class="normal" id="iii.iv-p32"><i>Objection</i>, It is granted that this doctrine of the divine 
decrees, as it has now been stated, might readily be admitted as certain and desirable, 
were it <i>possible</i>, and was it consistent with known fact, which it most certainly 
is not: Therefore, however great and clear the evidence of this doctrine may seem 
to be; and though it appear most desirable that all events should be determined 
by infinite wisdom and goodness; yet it cannot be true, because it is impossible 
and inconsistent with what has actually taken place. It is <i>impossible</i>, because 
inconsistent with moral government, and with the freedom and moral agency of creatures; 
and so excludes all possibility of virtue or vice, praise or blame, reward or punishment. 
And if this doctrine were consistent with all this; yet it is inconsistent with 
the evil which has taken place, both moral and natural evil, which could have no 
place in a plan formed and fixed by infinite wisdom and goodness, and comprehending 
the greatest possible good. Besides, to suppose all this evil was foreordained by 
God, and takes place in consequence of his purpose and decree, represents the Most 
High as the origin, cause or author of it all, even all the moral evil in the universe: 
And what can be more shocking and horrible than this!</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.iv-p33">In this objection are three distinct things, which re« quire a 
separate and particular consideration.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.iv-p34"><span class="sc" id="iii.iv-p34.1">First</span>. It is to be inquired. Whether the 
doctrine of God’s decrees, whereby he hath foreordained whatsoever comes to pass, 
is inconsistent with the liberty and moral agency of creatures, by fixing all events 
and all actions, so as to render them infallibly certain. And here it may be proper 
to observe several things, in order to prepare the way to a more clear determination 
of this question.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.iv-p35">1. If the doctrine of God’s decrees be inconsistent with the freedom 
and moral agency of man; then the foreknowledge of God is equally so: Therefore 
the objection under consideration is as much against the latter, as it is against 
the former. For if it be foreknown what events and what actions will take place, 
then they must be fixed and certain; since it is a contradiction to say, an event 
is certainly foreknown, and yet it is uncertain <pb n="95" id="iii.iv-Page_95" />
whether it will come to pass; just as great and palpable a contradiction as to say, 
an event is certain and fixed, and yet precarious and uncertain whether it will 
take place or not. Nothing can be the object of the divine foreknowledge, which 
is not fixed as certainly future. If it be not fixed by the decree of God, it must 
be fixed by blind fate, or by something else, if this were possible; and this surely 
is as inconsistent with the freedom of man, as if fixed by the counsel and decree 
of God: Yea, infinitely more so. This is observed, to show that he who makes the 
objection under consideration, and yet believes the foreknowledge of God, is inconsistent 
with himself; and must, would he be consistent, withdraw his objection, or give 
up the doctrine of God’s foreknowledge.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.iv-p36">II. It being confessedly so very important and desirable that 
whatsoever comes to pass should be determined and fixed by infinite wisdom and goodness, 
if this can be done consistent with moral government; and since God is infinitely 
great, powerful and wise, there is reason to conclude this is not impossible; but 
that both are perfectly consistent: Is it not presumption and arrogance for fallen 
man, ignorant and deceived in a thousand things, peremptorily, and with assurance 
to determine that it is impossible with God to make creatures, who shall be absolutely 
dependent upon him, in all respects, and so as to act perfectly conformable to his 
most wise plan, and fulfil his counsel, and yet exercise all the freedom necessary 
to moral agency? If this were <i>certainly known</i> to imply a contradiction, it 
might safely be pronounced impossible: But since many things have appeared to short 
sighted, partial man, inconsistent and impossible, and have been confidently pronounced 
to be such, which afterwards have been found to be otherwise, it may be so in this 
case. And if both these be really and perfectly consistent, how happy! Let this 
point then be examined without prejudice, and with the utmost care and attention, 
reviewing it again and again. And if the consistence may be discovered, what matter 
of consolation and joy will it afford!</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.iv-p37">III. It does not appear from our feelings and experience, that 
a previous certainty respecting our actions in <pb n="96" id="iii.iv-Page_96" />the least takes away 
or diminishes our freedom and moral agency. We feel ourselves free and accountable 
in our voluntary actions; and the supposition of a previous certainty that we should 
act just as we do, does not alter our feeling ourselves free, and <i>knowing</i> 
we act so, so far as our experience is to be regarded. Is not this a just ground 
of suspicion at least, that all objections and reasonings against this, by which 
it is concluded to be impossible, are fallacious and without foundation: Especially 
when it is considered, that a mistake respecting the divine decrees and superintendency, 
determining and fixing all events, which are so infinitely high, and above our reach; 
or about the nature of human liberty, &amp;c. will lead to groundless and very erroneous 
conclusions on this point?</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.iv-p38">IV. Since it is so consonant to reason, and even demonstrably 
certain, that a Being of infinite understanding, power and wisdom, who is absolutely 
independent, and on whom all creatures and events wholly depend, must determine 
and foreordain whatsoever comes to pass; and at the same time it is equally certain 
that men are free and moral agents: And since Divine Revelation most expressly and 
abundantly asserts both these; he who admits and believes them both to be true, 
however unable he may be to reconcile them, and show or conceive how they are consistent, 
acts a more reasonable and wise part, than those who reject one as not true, and 
impossible, merely because they cannot see their consistence.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.iv-p39">There are innumerable instances in the scriptures of God’s determining 
and foretelling the voluntary actions of men, and the events dependent on them: 
And yet, in those actions, they are represented as free and accountable, as sinful 
or virtuous, and blameable or commendable; as much so, as if their actions had not 
been thus fixed and foreknown. There is not perhaps a prediction in the Bible, which 
is not an instance of this; and most of those predictions do fix and declare to 
be certain, innumerable voluntary actions of men, which are either expressly foretold, 
or necessarily implied in the prophecy. Only a few instances, out of the many, will 
here be mentioned, as sufficient to illustrate this observation. The <pb n="97" id="iii.iv-Page_97" />
conduct of Pharaoh and the Egyptians, towards the children of Israel, was determined 
and foretold long before it took place, to Abraham and to Moses: And yet they were 
considered and treated as moral agents, and culpable, and were punished for those 
very actions which were foreordained and foretold. God said to Abraham, “Know of 
a surety, that thy seed shall be a stranger in a land that is not theirs, and shall 
serve them, and they shall afflict them four hundred years. And also, that nation, 
whom they shall serve, will I judge.” And God told Abraham that he would bring his 
seed from Egypt into the land of Canaan, after four hundred years, which event depended 
on millions of millions of voluntary free actions of that people, and of others. 
And he promised the same thing to Moses, and that they should hearken to him, when 
he seat him into Egypt to deliver them; and that they should worship God in Mount 
Sinai; and he said to Moses, “I am sure that the king of Egypt will not let 
you go. And I will stretch out my hand, and smite Egypt, and after that, he will 
let you go.”</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.iv-p40">God told Moses that the people of Israel would apostatize after 
his death, and practise idolatry, &amp;c. and that he would punish them for it. Upon 
which Moses said to them, “I know that after my death ye will utterly corrupt yourselves, 
and turn aside from the way which I have commanded you: And evil will befal you 
in the latter days, because ye will do evil in the sight of the Lord, to provoke 
him to anger, through the work of your hands.”</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.iv-p41">The rise, grandeur and ruin of particular kingdoms and empires 
are foretold as fixed and certain, which depended on innumerable voluntary actions 
of innumerable men, and could not be accomplished without them; which therefore 
must be fixed and certain. The Persian, Grecian and Roman empires, are instances 
of this, as well as many other kingdoms.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.iv-p42">The evil that Hazael did to the children of Israel was foretold, 
and therefore determined and fixed, long before he did it. And the particular actions 
of Cyrus, and of Josiah, were determined and foretold long before they were born: 
Yet this did not render them the less free and accountable as moral agents, in what 
they did.</p>
<pb n="98" id="iii.iv-Page_98" />
<p class="normal" id="iii.iv-p43">But one instance more, among the many thousands that might be 
produced from the Bible, will now be mentioned. It is that of the Jews crucifying 
our Lord. It was before fixed and written that thus it must be; and by their voluntary 
conduct in this affair, God fulfilled those things which he before had shewed by 
the mouth of all his prophets: And, in putting Christ to death, they did the very 
things which his hand and counsel determined before to be done. Surely he who will 
well attend to this must be sensible that to say, that God’s foreordaining whatsoever 
comes to pass, is inconsistent with the liberty and moral agency of man, does at 
the same time affirm, at least implicitly, that it is impossible the Bible should 
be from God.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.iv-p44">Therefore, seeing the previous infallible certainty of all things 
which come to pass is necessarily implied in the foreknowledge of God, and the former 
cannot be rejected, without denying the latter: And since reason teaches that a 
Being of infinite power, wisdom and goodness, on whom all things absolutely depend 
for their existence, and every mode and circumstance of it, must determine by the 
counsel of his own will, and foreordain whatsoever comes to pass; and that it is 
infinitely important and desirable that he should do it, and that all events should 
be determined by infinite wisdom, rather than by any thing else: And since, according 
to our own feeling and experience, this is consistent with our freedom and moral 
agency: And since Divine Revelation abundantly asserts both these; and declares 
men to be moral agents, and accountable in those actions which have been foreordained 
and fixed by divine counsel and decrees; and therefore to deny these to be consistent, 
is really to renounce the Bible: When all these things are well considered, will 
it not appear to be amazing boldness, and the height of stupidity and arrogance, 
in a fallen, short sighted, ignorant man, liable to a thousand prejudices and mistakes, 
confidently, and without hesitation to pronounce these two doctrines absolutely 
inconsistent with each other? How much more modest, reasonable, and becoming us, 
is it to believe them both to be true and perfectly consistent? And if any have 
not yet been able to see how they may be reconciled; <pb n="99" id="iii.iv-Page_99" />
let them not rashly conclude that no man ever did, or ever will see their consistence 
with each other, and reduce it to a plain demonstration: Nor ought they themselves 
so to despair of receiving light and full satisfaction on this point, as to neglect 
ail means and attempts to obtain it; but aught rather, with a proper sense of the 
importance of the matter, and their accountableness to God, for their belief and 
feelings respecting it; and with humble, fervent, constant application to the Father 
of Lights, for a wise and understanding heart; carefully to attend to the subject, 
and diligently improve every opportunity and advantage they may have to obtain that 
understanding which is pleasant to the soul, and more precious than the finest gold.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.iv-p45">Attention to the foregoing preliminaries, it is hoped, has, in 
some measure, prepared the mind to a careful and candid examination of this point, 
about which there has been so much dispute in our world. Therefore the question 
will now be resumed, which is, <i>How the divine decrees, foreordaining whatsoever 
comes to pass, can be consistent with the freedom and moral agency of man?</i></p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.iv-p46">There can be no light respecting this question; nor can it be 
determined, without proper, precise and consistent ideas of both these subjects, 
about which the inquiry is made, the divine decrees, and the freedom essential to 
moral agency. Without this, it will be impossible to determine whether they be consistent 
with each other, or not; and if we affirm, or deny, we shall talk in the dark, “not 
knowing what we say, or whereof we affirm.” My neighbour now comes into my study, 
and asks, whether a table he has made for me, can be introduced and have room here? 
I ask him, what is the length and breadth of it? He answers, it is <i>three yards</i> 
square. I tell him, it can then be of no use to me, nor can it be introduced. He 
is confident I am mistaken. And after some dispute, we at length conclude to take 
a common measure and apply it to the table, and to my door and study. Upon this 
the matter is soon decided, and it is found that the former agrees exactly with 
the latter; for his <i>yard-stick</i> was found to be but twelve inches long.</p>
<pb n="100" id="iii.iv-Page_100" />
<p class="normal" id="iii.iv-p47">To prevent, as far as possible, all mistakes concerning the doctrine 
of God’s decrees, it must be observed, that it may be justly considered as a medium 
between the two extremes, viz. of a supposed <i>fatality</i> in all things; every 
thing, and all events, being unalterably fixed by blind and undesigning fate on 
the one hand, and on the other, of a perfect <i>contingence</i> and uncertainty 
respecting all future events, there being no cause or reason of their taking place; 
but all things come to pass by mere chance. It would be infinitely undesirable, 
and dreadful, if either of these opposite extremes were true, or possible, as they 
certainly are not, each of them implying such absurdity, contradiction and impossibility, 
that it may be presumed no one ever yet had a real idea or conception of either.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.iv-p48">All things, and every event, are indeed <i>fixed</i> by the decree 
of God; but they are wisely, and therefore most happily contrived and adjusted, 
as has been before observed, so as to make one most wise, consistent, and absolutely 
perfect plan: And in which the freedom and moral agency of rational creatures are 
effectually secured (if this can be done by infinite wisdom, clothed with omnipotence; 
and whether this be possible is now to be considered) and made a necessary and essential 
part of the divine plan.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.iv-p49">This leads more particularly to observe, that this doctrine does 
not imply, but totally excludes a notion, which many have had of the divine decrees, 
which supposes that certain events, especially those which are the greatest and 
most important to man, are fixed and made certain, independent of the agency of 
man, and of any means whatsoever; and wholly unconnected with any thing of this 
kind; so that they will come to pass just as they are decreed, let man’s conduct 
be what it may. <i>For instance</i>, they suppose that if the time of a man’s death 
be appointed; he will live to that time, whatever means necessary to preserve his 
life shall be neglected, as eating and drinking, &amp;c. and whatever may be done to 
take away his life. And if it be decreed that a particular person shall be saved, 
or he be elected to life, he shall certainly be saved, let him conduct as he will; 
and though he live and die in impenitence and unbelief: <pb n="101" id="iii.iv-Page_101" />
And if he be not elected, he must perish, let him do what he can, and though he 
sincerely seek salvation, and however humble, penitent and obedient he may be.—The 
scripture doctrine of God’s decrees does not imply, but absolutely excludes, such 
an absurd notion and fatality as this; and makes the use of means, and agency of 
man, as important and necessary, in order to accomplish any proposed end, as if 
there were no decree respecting it: And, indeed, much more so: For if there were 
no appointed connection between means, and the attempts and exertions of men, and 
the end, then they would be of no importance, and have no tendency to the end; and 
there would not be the least reason or encouragement to do or attempt any thing, 
or use any means to accomplish any end whatsoever.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.iv-p50">It cannot with truth be said, that according to the doctrine of 
God’s decrees, he who is elected to salvation, shall be saved, let him do what he 
will, and live and die in impenitence and unbelief; for there is no election or 
decree inconsistent with the declaration of Christ, “He that believeth not shall 
be damned.” They who are appointed to salvation by the decree of God are “elected 
according to the foreknowledge of God the Father, through sanctification of the 
Spirit unto obedience.” And none are appointed to destruction, whether they believe 
or not; for “he that believeth shall be saved.” This is particularly observed 
here, because the true scripture doctrine is so generally misunderstood in this 
point, and consequently misrepresented; especially by those who do not believe this 
doctrine, but oppose it.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.iv-p51">The doctrine of God’s decrees, including the means as well as 
the end, and connecting one with the other, so as to render the former important 
and necessary as the latter, as has been now stated and explained, in opposition 
to the absurd notion of <i>fatality</i> just mentioned, may be illustrated by a 
piece of history which we have in the Acts of the Apostles.<note n="64" id="iii.iv-p51.1"><p class="normal" id="iii.iv-p52"><scripRef id="iii.iv-p52.1" passage="Acts xxvii." parsed="|Acts|27|0|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Acts.27">Acts xxvii.</scripRef></p></note> 
The apostle Paul being in a terrible storm at sea, and “all hope that they should 
be saved was taken away,” had a revelation from heaven, that not one of them in 
the ship should lose his life; but they should all get safe to land. Upon which 
he <pb n="102" id="iii.iv-Page_102" />
stood forth, and declared it unto them, and his assurance that this revealed decree 
would come to pass. Thus Paul and his company were <i>elected</i> to be saved from 
the danger of the sea; the preservation of their lives was unalterably fixed, and 
certain. Yet, soon after this, while they were yet in danger, and the seamen, who 
only could manage the ship, were about to quit it, to provide for their own safety, 
“Paul said to the centurion, and to the soldiers, <span class="sc" id="iii.iv-p52.2">except these abide 
in the ship, ye cannot be saved</span>.” Here the doctrine of the <i>fatalist</i> 
above mentioned is contradicted, and declared not to be true; and that the decree, 
making their salvation absolutely certain, did not exclude the necessity of the 
use of means, in order to its taking place; but included this, and made their agency 
in the use of means important and necessary, there being a connection between these, 
and the end. It appears that in this instance, the means, and the exertions and 
agency of those who were to be saved, were as much appointed and fixed, as their 
salvation: and the latter could not come to pass without the former. And this is 
equally true of ail other instances of the purposes and decrees of God; so that 
this instance is an illustration of all others that can be mentioned, or that do 
exist. And they who separate the means from the end, and say, or expect, that what 
God has appointed will come to pass, whether any means are used to bring it to pass 
or not, do separate what God has joined together by infallible connection. And they 
assert what is not true, and believe and trust in a falsehood.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.iv-p53">And, by the way, if Paul and his companions were free moral agents 
in all they did in this affair, and which was necessary in order to their getting 
safe to land; and the declared decree respecting it, which fixed the whole train 
of actions and events that took place, w as not in the least inconsistent with their 
acting freely, but implied it; and they felt, and really were, as perfectly free 
as if there had been no decree in the case: Then the divine decrees, by which all 
events are made certain, cannot, <i>in any instance</i>, be inconsistent with the 
free moral agency of men. But no one, it is presumed, who reads this story, or ever 
has read it, thought or can think, that <pb n="103" id="iii.iv-Page_103" />
their freedom was taken from them by this decree, so as to render them no longer 
moral agents; or that it could have the least influence in rendering them in any 
degree, less free and accountable in their exercises and conduct on this occasion: 
And it would not alter the case a whit with respect to their freedom and moral agency, 
had there been no decree determining what should take place; and had there been 
no previous certainty whether they should be saved or perish, or how they would 
conduct in those circumstances, and at that time. Does not every one who attends 
to this story, and consults his own sense and feeling, consider them as exercising 
all desirable or possible liberty of action, and blame or approve of their conduct, 
as much as if there had been no decree respecting it, and the event? If so, then 
we have the verdict of the common sense and feelings of mankind in favour of the 
consistence of the doctrine of the divine decrees, with human liberty and moral 
agency. What need is there then of proceeding any farther on this subject?</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.iv-p54">However, as more light may perhaps be thrown upon it by considering 
what is free moral agency, and wherein it consists; it may be of advantage to attend 
to this matter more particularly; by which it is hoped it may be more clearly seen, 
whether this moral freedom be consistent with the certainty of all events, which 
is implied in the doctrine of the divine decrees; and if consistent, <i>how</i> 
they are so, and may be perfectly reconciled.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.iv-p55">It has been before observed, that nothing can be determined on 
this point, without forming an idea of the liberty essential to moral agency, and 
determining what it is, and wherein it consists: For he who knows not what liberty 
is, is not in a capacity to determine what is consistent with it, or what is inconsistent. 
Men will differ on the question before us, as they have different notions respecting 
human liberty; and if they be agreed in this, they will agree in the decision of 
it. The question then is. What is liberty? What is that freedom which is essential 
to moral agency?</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.iv-p56">The only way, perhaps, for any one to obtain the most satisfactory 
answer to this question, is to consult his own <pb n="104" id="iii.iv-Page_104" />
feelings, and inquire what that is: what are the exercises and exertions in which 
he supposes, yea, is certain, he acts freely, and is a moral agent. He will doubtless 
find that the internal freedom of which he is conscious, consisteth in his <i>voluntary 
exercises</i>, or in <i>choosing</i> and <i>willing</i>; that he is conscious that 
in all his <i>voluntary exertions</i> he is perfectly free, and must be accountable; 
and has no consciousness or idea of any other kind of moral liberty; or that the 
liberty he exerciseth hath any thing more or less belonging to it; or that it could 
be increased, or made more perfect freedom, by the addition of any thing that is 
not implied in willing and choosing.<note n="65" id="iii.iv-p56.1"><p class="normal" id="iii.iv-p57">It is to be observed, and kept in mind, 
in attending to what is here said on human liberty, that every degree of active 
inclination and moral exercise of heart, is included in <i>willing</i> and <i>choosing</i>, 
as well as what are called the <i>imperate</i> and <i>overt</i> acts of the will: 
For such inclination or exercise of heart, in every degree and instance of it, is 
not distinguishable from exercise of will and choice; but is really the same thing.</p></note> 
He may indeed not be able to accomplish the thing or event which is the object of 
his choice; and, in this respect, be under restraint; but this is not inconsistent 
with his exercising perfect freedom in his choice, and in all his voluntary exertions, 
or in all he <i>does</i> with respect to such object or event. And in these exercises 
of will and choice his moral character does wholly consist; and therefore here he 
looks, even to his inclination and choice to determine what is his moral character, 
whether he be sinful or virtuous, and approves or condemns, according as he judges 
of the nature and quality of his inclination and choice; and they appear to him 
to be right or wrong, according as they are conformable or not to the rule or law, 
under which he considers himself placed.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.iv-p58">And where can freedom, moral agency, virtue and vice be found, 
if they consist not in voluntary exercises? Shall we look to something which takes 
place in our minds antecedent to choice and voluntary action, by which acts of choice 
are determined, and out of which they spring, and place liberty and virtue and sin 
in that? This will be to place these wholly in that, in which we have no concern 
as agents, as we are no more <pb n="105" id="iii.iv-Page_105" />active in that which precedes our exercise 
of will and choice, than a rock or tree; or than we were in those events which took 
place ages before we were born.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.iv-p59">Shall liberty and moral agency be considered as consisting in 
what <i>follows</i> the exercise of will, or voluntary exertions, and takes place
<i>after</i> the will ceases to act? There is indeed as much propriety and reason 
in placing them <i>here</i>, as in any thing that is antecedent to the exercise 
of will: But surely no man in his senses can imagine, that there is the exercise 
of liberty and moral action, where there is no liberty, choice or action, whether 
it be antecedent to these, or consequent upon them, and after they cease. When our 
will and choice are over, or we cease to will, our agency is at an end; and most 
certainly there can be no liberty exercised, when there is no exercise of any kind, 
no action.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.iv-p60">If voluntary action, or the exercise of will and choice, be not 
freedom and moral agency: and if all virtue and sin do not consist in this, and 
are not to be found here, even in the will and choice itself; it will be impossible 
to find them any where, or that there should be any such thing: And they are therefore 
but empty names. Every exercise of the will in choosing or refusing is the exercise 
of freedom: And it is impossible for man to will and choose without exercising moral 
liberty; and as impossible to exercise liberty without voluntary action, or exercising 
choice. Therefore, to say a man is not free in exercising will and choice, is to 
say he is not free in that, in which freedom wholly consists, and is the only possible 
exercise of liberty; or that he is not voluntary or does not choose in willing and 
choosing: And, it is no more improper and absurd to ask, whether a man is rational 
in reasoning, or to say he is not, than it is to ask, whether he is free in willing 
and choosing; or to affirm that he is not. And that because the exercise of freedom 
and the exercise of will, are convertible terms, and are indeed one and the same 
thing; as really as reasoning is the exercise of reason; or existence is existing. 
And if there be any such thing as moral agency, it consists in the exercise of will 
and choice, and in nothing else: and virtue and vice, praise and blame, are predicable 
of this only, and belong <pb n="106" id="iii.iv-Page_106" />wholly to the exercises of will or voluntary 
action, and are as the inclination, will or choice is.<note n="66" id="iii.iv-p60.1"><p class="normal" id="iii.iv-p61">It is therefore certain 
that man is perfectly free, or has all the freedom that in the nature of things 
is possible, in the exercise of will and choice, or in acting voluntarily; and God, 
in forming man a voluntary agent, made him a free moral agent, and he cannot be 
deprived of this freedom and moral agency, unless he be made to cease from acting 
from motive, and exercising will and choice.</p></note></p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.iv-p62">It may therefore be safely presumed, that no man, by consulting 
his own exercise and feelings, or in reasoning properly about them, ever had any 
other idea or conception of liberty, and that moral agency by which he is accountable 
for his exercises and conduct, but that which consists in voluntary action, or in 
will and choice; though many have confused and bewildered themselves on this point, 
by using words without any real meaning, and with mere chimeras and imaginations, 
which are perfectly inconsistent, and have no real existence.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.iv-p63">For instance; it has been often said, that there can be no liberty 
in man without a <i>self determining power</i>; and that freedom consists in this, 
even in determining his own volitions, what they shall be, Sec.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.iv-p64">Upon this it may be observed, that if it be meant, that man himself 
exerts his own volitions, and they are his own actions, and that he determines his 
own choice in actively willing and choosing; so that there can be no choice without 
his exertion and activity, and where he is wholly passive; and that, <i>in this 
sense</i>, he is the cause and author of his own volitions; then nothing is meant 
more than will be granted, and has been asserted above, viz. that he does <i>act</i> 
in willing and choosing, and is really the author, or actor of his own acts. But 
if by <i>self determining power</i> be meant, a power or capacity to determine, 
previous to any act of choice, what he will choose, (which must be their meaning, 
if they are not satisfied with that now expressed; and if that which is self contradictory 
can be said to have any real meaning) then what they mean to assert is, that in 
order to a man’s being free in his choice, he must, by a <i>foregoing</i> act of 
power, exerted <i>before</i> he begins to will and choose, determine what his choice 
shall be. That is, he must act and determine, <i>before</i> he begins to act by 
choice; or he must make a choice before he begins to choose, and in <pb n="107" id="iii.iv-Page_107" />
order to it; which cannot be exceeded in self contradiction and absurdity: It being 
as absurd as to say, that a man can have no motion unless he do, previous to all 
his motion, move himself; that is, move himself before he begins to move. Or that 
his existence was produced by an exertion of his own, before he existed, putting 
himself into existence.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.iv-p65">Agreeable to this notion of a <i>self determining power</i>, and 
in support of it, it is said, that a man cannot be free in his voluntary actions, 
unless he has a <i>freedom to either side</i>; that is, has a freedom to choose 
or refuse, to prefer one thing, or the contrary; or has power and freedom to choose 
that, which is directly contrary to that which is actually the object of his choice. 
If by this be meant that whenever any one freely chooses any particular object or 
act, or is inclined any particular way, he is at liberty to prefer a contrary object 
or act, and to incline the contrary way, <i>if he please</i>, or wills and chooses 
so to do; this is no more than to say, that in the exercise of liberty, a man must 
choose agreeable to his choice; or has his choice; that is, must be voluntary: And 
therefore is not a contradiction to that which has been above asserted, viz. that 
liberty consists in the exercises of will and choice, or voluntary action.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.iv-p66">But if by <i>a freedom to choose either side</i>, be meant, that 
in order to the exercise of a free act of choice, he must, at the same time, be 
as much disposed or inclined to choose the contrary, or be no more inclined one 
way than the other; there is no need of saying any thing to expose the absurdity 
and inconsistence of this, to those who allow themselves to think: For it is the 
same as to say, that in order to a moral agent’s choosing freely, he must really 
have no choice; or when he inclines one way, in order to be free, he must be equally 
inclined the contrary way, so as to make no preference of the one to the other. 
This assertion, thus understood, (if such an inconsistence, which destroys itself, 
can be properly said to be understood) is inconsistent with any possible liberty, 
and with all preference and choice, moral agency, virtue and vice, and utterly excludes 
all these out of the universe.</p>
<pb n="108" id="iii.iv-Page_108" />
<p class="normal" id="iii.iv-p67">They who have contended for a self-determining power, as essential 
to the freedom of moral agents; and <i>a freedom to either side</i>, as now mentioned, 
do hold to what they call <i>a liberty of indifference</i>. That in order to the 
exercise of free choice, in the time of choosing or making a preference, or immediately 
antecedent to it, there must be no inclination of the mind to one thing more than 
to another; and that every act of choice must arise out of a perfect indifference 
to either side, by a sovereign determining act, turning the will one certain way, 
and causing or producing an inclination, where there was none before.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.iv-p68">It is not needful to point out all the absurdities of such a notion; 
as supposing an exertion or act of the mind, previous to an act of will or choice 
(by which alone the mind can act) determining what the choice shall be; and that 
while the mind is perfectly indifferent, as to any preference or choice; and so 
inclination and choice must originate from, and rise out of that which is no inclination 
or choice; as its true cause, in order to be a free choice! And yet liberty does 
not consist in this free choice; for there is no indifference in choice; but it 
lies in that indifference to all choice or inclination, which is as far from choice 
as nonentity is from existence; and which by some inconceivable, impossible exertion 
of its own, produces inclination or volition, as contradictory to itself, as nothing 
is to something!</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.iv-p69">These things have been observed, to confirm the truth under consideration, 
viz. that liberty, moral agency, virtue and vice, blame and praise worthiness, consist 
wholly in the exercise of will and choice, made in the view of motives; and in nothing 
else beside, or which is antecedent to, or consequent upon <i>voluntary action</i>. 
That this is the highest and most perfect liberty in nature; and no other freedom 
of moral agents can be conceived of, or is possible. That this is the freedom which 
we feel and experience, when we consider and pronounce ourselves free; and that 
of which we have an idea in others, when we view them as accountable for their conduct, 
as <pb n="109" id="iii.iv-Page_109" />
virtuous or vicious, and worthy of praise or blame, reward or punishment.<note n="67" id="iii.iv-p69.1"><p class="normal" id="iii.iv-p70">
It was thought proper and necessary briefly to consider in what liberty and moral 
agency consist, in order to determine, whether real liberty be consistent with the 
absolute previous certainty of all events and actions, implied in the doctrine of 
God’s decrees. But the subject is by no means exhausted here; nor is there need 
of it, since it has been more particularly and fully considered by those able writers. 
President <span class="sc" id="iii.iv-p70.1">Edwards</span>, in his <i>careful and strict inquiry 
into the modern, prevailing notions of that freedom of will, which is supposed to 
be essential to moral agency, virtue and vice, reward and punishment, praise and 
blame</i>. And Mr. <span class="sc" id="iii.iv-p70.2">West</span>, in his <i>Essay on moral agency</i>. 
The reader who desires to see a more thorough and clear discussion of this point, 
is with pleasure referred to those performances, where he will, it is presumed, 
find abundant satisfaction.</p></note></p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.iv-p71">And now, from the view we have had of the doctrine of God’s decrees, 
and of the nature of human liberty and moral agency, and in what they consist, it 
may be easily determined whether they are consistent with each other; and that their 
perfect consistence is demonstrably clear and certain. For if liberty and moral 
agency consist in the exercise of will and choice, or voluntary exertions; which 
is all the liberty of which we are, or can be conscious, can have any conception, 
or is possible, as has been shewn; then the absolute fixedness and certainty of 
all events is perfectly consistent with liberty: For though all events be decreed, 
and every motion and exercise of the will, and all moral actions, be determined 
from eternity, this is so far from destroying the liberty of man, that it establishes 
it, and makes it certain, viz. that he shall thus will and choose. The exercise 
of this liberty and agency is as important and necessary, as if there were no fixed 
certainty of events; and more, much more so. This liberty is consistent with the 
moral agent’s absolute and universal dependence on God, while he acts freely and 
is under moral government and is accountable to the supreme Being, in all those 
exercises by which the events comprehended and fixed in the divine infinitely wise 
plan, do come to pass: This therefore is the only <i>desirable</i> as well as the 
only <i>possible</i> liberty. If there were, or could be any other liberty of moral 
agents, it would be <i>infinitely dreadful!</i> As it would be inconsistent with 
the real, absolute supremacy of the Deity, and with his perfect universal providence, 
and infinitely wise, uncontrolled government.</p>
<pb n="110" id="iii.iv-Page_110" />
<p class="normal" id="iii.iv-p72"><i>Secondly</i>, It is to be considered whether the <i>evil</i>, 
both moral and natural, which has taken place, and may continue without end, be 
really inconsistent with the decrees of God, foreordaining whatsoever comes to pass.
</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.iv-p73">It is probable that the existence of evil in God’s world, and 
before our eyes, has been with many the chief, if not the only ground of dissatisfaction 
with this doctrine, and the opposition made to it. If no action or event had taken 
place, but such as appeared to men perfectly right, wise and good; and therefore 
most agreeable and desirable, none surely would object against God’s ordaining every 
thing that was to take place, in the best manner possible. But since evil has actually 
taken place, both sin and suffering; and is like to continue forever, to a dreadful 
and amazing degree; men have been ready to think and say, “Surely this world had 
been infinitely better, more desirable and happy, if all evil had been effectually 
and forever excluded, both moral and natural; and nothing but perfect, eternal holiness 
and happiness had taken place. This is certainly an imperfect, disorderly, confused 
system, undesirably marred, and in a great measure ruined, by the rebellion of creatures 
against their Maker, and their consequent sufferings. How then is it possible that 
an infinitely wise, powerful and good God, should decree and foreordain all this? 
To say he has done it, is rather to represent him as unwise and evil, than wise 
and good; though this might be done, consistent with the freedom and moral agency 
of man.”</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.iv-p74">It is of great importance that this difficulty and objection should 
be removed, if possible; for it is not only an objection against God, foreordaining 
whatsoever comes to pass; but is equally irreconcileable with his supreme, uncontrolled, 
wise and good government of the world. This leads to observe,</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.iv-p75">I. This objection does not really lie against those who hold that 
God has foreordained whatsoever comes to pass, more than against those who do not 
admit this doctrine. And therefore it is far from being just, or agreeable to truth, 
to consider and represent it, as militating only, or in a peculiar manner, against 
such a doctrine. For, if the matter be well considered, it will appear, <pb n="111" id="iii.iv-Page_111" />
that the objection may be with equal reason and force urged against the objector 
himself, or those doctrines which he professes to believe. This difficulty, if it 
be one, is not peculiar to <i>predestinarians</i>, but is common to all, who believe 
in one supreme, infinitely powerful, wise and good Creator and Governor of the world. 
It has therefore been represented as <i>the Gordian knot</i> in philosophy and theology, 
and a question above all others unanswerable, <span class="sc" id="iii.iv-p75.1">Whence cometh evil?</span> 
God is infinitely good; and therefore could not be willing or consent it should 
take place: But it could not take place, contrary to his will; for he is infinitely 
wise; and therefore must know how it might be prevented; and he is almighty, and 
nothing is impossible with him; therefore he was able to prevent it, if he had pleased 
to do it. How then is it possible that evil should take place, under the government 
of this God; while he sits at the head of the universe; has all things in his hand, 
absolutely dependent upon him, and rules infinitely above all control?</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.iv-p76">This question cannot be answered, on any plan, to the satisfaction 
of a rational, inquisitive mind, or the difficulty in any measure solved, unless 
it be supposed and granted, <i>That all the evil which does take place, is necessary 
for the greatest possible general good; and therefore on the whole, all things considered, 
wisest and best that it should exist just as it does</i>.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.iv-p77">All who believe the divine foreknowledge, or admit that an infinitely 
perfect Being made and governs the world, must adopt this solution, and grant that, 
on the whole, it is best that evil, moral and natural, should take place; or be 
left wholly without any satisfactory solution at all: And indeed, they do either 
expressly or implicitly grant it, however they may differ as to the mode of explaining 
the matter, and the reasons why it is better that evil should exist, than otherwise. 
They who oppose the doctrine of the divine decrees, and yet allow that God could 
have prevented evil taking place, had he pleased to do it, cannot account for his 
not preventing it, unless they allow that he saw it was on the whole best, that 
it should not be prevented; and therefore it was, on the whole, best it should exist.</p>
<pb n="112" id="iii.iv-Page_112" />
<p class="normal" id="iii.iv-p78">And they who suppose that sin could not be prevented, if God made 
free moral agents, and continued them in the exercise of their freedom; and account 
for the introduction of evil in this way; yet must grant that, <i>all things considered</i>, 
it was better that there should be sin, rather than that there should be no moral 
agents; and that the system or plan which includes evil, is the best that was possible. 
For if God foresaw, that if he made moral agents, vast numbers of them would, in 
the exercise of their freedom, fall into sin and ruin, he would not have made them, 
and continued them in the exercise of their liberty, if it were not best, on the 
whole, that evil should take place; and if this was not preferable to any other 
possible plan; and he did not, all things considered, choose that evil should exist, 
just as it does. For to say that God made free moral agents, when he knew that they 
would sin, if he made them; and yet knew that it was not best, <i>all things considered</i>, 
that moral evil should exist; is to say, that he is neither wise nor good, as well 
as not omnipotent. This is so plain that it is needless to say any more to make 
it intelligible and evident to the lowest capacity.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.iv-p79">And the same thing, in effect, must be granted even by them who 
deny the divine foreknowledge of the actions of creatures made free. For if God 
knew that sin might possibly take place, if he made moral agents; and at the same 
time knew that it was not, <i>all things considered</i>, best that it should take 
place; but infinitely to the contrary, it could not be best to make any such creatures, 
and run this dreadful venture; and open a door for the possible introduction of 
this infinite evil, which never could be remedied: and therefore it was not consistent 
with wisdom and goodness to make them free, and continue them so, on this supposition. 
They must therefore grant that it was, in God’s view, on the whole, better that 
evil should take place, and to have the world fall into sin and ruin, than not to 
create moral agents, and have no moral kingdom; and that he preferred such a world, 
and to have sinful miserable creatures, rather than not to create; or they must 
allow that their God was deceived, and is dreadfully disappointed, and now heartily 
wishes he had not created; or is <pb n="113" id="iii.iv-Page_113" />neither wise nor good: Which is to 
have no God, or something infinitely worse! It must therefore be observed,</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.iv-p80">II. It is abundantly evident and demonstrably certain from reason, 
assisted by divine revelation, that all the sin and sufferings which have taken 
place, or ever will, are necessary for the greatest good of the universe, and to 
answer the wisest and best ends; and therefore must be included in the best, most 
wise and perfect plan.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.iv-p81">1. This appears evident and certain from the being and perfections 
of God. God is omnipotent; his understanding is infinite, and he is equally wise 
and good. He is infinitely above all dependence and control; and hath done, and 
can and will do whatsoever pleaseth him. It hence is certain that he will do no 
thing, nor suffer any thing to be done or take place, which is not, on the whole, 
good, wisest and best, that it should take place, and is not most agreeable to infinite 
wisdom and goodness. It is impossible it should be otherwise. Therefore, when we 
find that sin and misery have taken place in God’s world, and under his government, 
we may be as certain that it is, on the whole, best it should be so; and that all 
this evil is necessary in order to answer the best ends, the greatest good of the 
universe, as we can be, that there is a God, omnipotent, and possessed of infinite 
wisdom, rectitude and goodness; and he who denies or doubts of the former, equally 
questions and opposes the latter. If it be once admitted that any evil, or the least 
event may, or can take place, which is not, on the whole, best, and therefore not 
desirable that it should be, it must with equal reason be granted, that nothing 
but evil, and what is, on the whole, undesirable, may take place; and that the universe 
may become wholly evil, or infinitely worse than nothing: And all would be left 
without any ground or reason to trust in God, or any thing else, for the least good 
for himself, or any other being. The divine perfections and character are the only 
security against this, and are the ground of an equal certainty that nothing has 
taken place, or ever will, which is not on the whole best, or necessary for the 
greatest good of the whole. And this is a sure and ample foundation for the trusty 
confidence, <pb n="114" id="iii.iv-Page_114" />comfort and joy of him who is a true friend to God, and 
desires the greatest good of the whole; and consequently is irreconcileably opposed 
to every event which is not, on the whole, wisest and best. If <i>this foundation</i> 
were taken away and destroyed, what could the righteous, the truly pious and benevolent 
do? They must be left without any possible support, and sink into darkness and wo!</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.iv-p82">There can nothing take place under the care and government of 
an infinitely powerful, wise and good Being, that is not on the whole wisest and 
best; that is, for the general good; therefore, though there be things which are
<i>in themselves evil</i>, even in their own nature and tendency, such are sin and 
misery; yet considered in their connection with the whole, and as they are necessary 
in the best system, to accomplish the greatest good, the most important and best 
ends, they are in this view, desirable, good, and not evil. And in this view, “There 
is no <i>absolute evil</i> in the universe.” There are evils, <i>in themselves considered</i>; 
but considered as connected with the whole, they are not evil, but good. As <i>shades</i> 
are necessary in a picture, to render it most complete and beautiful, they are, 
in this view and connection, desirable; and the picture would be imperfect and marred, 
were they not included in it; vet considered separately, and unconnected with the 
whole, they have no beauty, but deformity, and are very disagreeable: So moral evil 
is, in itself considered, in its own nature and tendency, most odious, hurtful and 
undesirable; but in the hands of omnipotence, infinite wisdom and goodness, it may 
be introduced into the most perfect plan and system, and so disposed, and counteracted 
in its nature and tendency, as to be a necessary part of it, in order to render 
it most complete and desirable,<note n="68" id="iii.iv-p82.1"><p class="normal" id="iii.iv-p83">“Sin, in its own nature, hath no tendency to good, it is not an 
apt medium, hath no proper <i>efficacy</i> to promote the glory of God: So far is 
it from a direct contributing to it, that, on the contrary, it is most real dishonour 
to him. But as a <i>black</i> ground in a picture, which in itself only defiles, 
when placed by art, sets off the brighter colours, and brightens their beauty; so 
the evil of sin, which, considered absolutely, obscures the glory of God; yet, by 
the overruling disposition of his Providence, it serves to illustrate his name, 
and make it more glorious in the esteem of creatures. Without the sin of man, there 
had been no place for the most perfect exercise of his goodness.”</p>
<p class="right" id="iii.iv-p84"><span class="sc" id="iii.iv-p84.1">Bates</span>, <i>on the Harmony of the Divine 
Attributes</i>, Edit. iii. p. 81</p></note></p>
<pb n="115" id="iii.iv-Page_115" />


<p class="normal" id="iii.iv-p85">It has been said by some, that it is not becoming us, but presumption 
and arrogance, to say, that the system in which moral evil takes place is, on the 
whole, preferable to one in which it is wholly excluded; and is, all things considered, 
the best system, containing the greatest good. It is said, we are infinitely unable 
to determine this, unless we could comprehend the whole of each opposite system, 
and compare them together, and without error, determine the advantage of either, 
and see the good of each in their final issue, and exactly balance the account.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.iv-p86">The weakness, error, and impiety of such an objection, will be 
sufficiently discovered and exposed, by observing, that though man is infinitely 
unequal to this, to take a comprehensive view of all possible systems, and determine 
which would be the best, and comprehend the greatest possible good; and is far from 
seeing all the ends that moral evil will answer; and though he could not see how 
it could be the occasion of any good, and why a plan, in which all evil is forever 
excluded, is not infinitely preferable to that in which evil exists and continues 
forever: Yet we know that One, infinitely able to judge and determine in this matter, 
has actually chosen and fixed upon a system in which moral evil takes place, and 
preferred it to all other possible systems; from which known fact, we may be as 
certain, that it is, on the whole, the best possible system, containing the most 
real good, as we are, that he is omnipotent, infinitely wise and good; and to question 
the former, is equally to deny, or doubt of the latter. If God be infinitely perfect, 
wise and good, his plan of operation, and all his works, must be so too; and we 
cannot entertain the least doubt whether it be not, on the whole, best, and for 
the greatest general good, that evil should take place, without impeaching the divine 
character and perfections. And to say that it would have been better, on the whole, 
if sin and all the consequences of it had never taken place, is the same as to say, 
that God is neither wise nor good, or had not power to execute what he saw was best, 
and desired to do, had he been able. It is not necessary that it should be determined 
and known what is the greatest good; or what is the best plan to <pb n="116" id="iii.iv-Page_116" />effect 
this, were it known in what it consists, in order to decide this matter. It is enough, 
that God knows and has certainly fixed upon the wisest and best method to accomplish 
it; and therefore it is certain, that in order to this, it is necessary that moral 
evil, in all its eternal consequences, should take place. But if the greatest possible 
manifestation and display of the divine perfections, and the highest possible degree 
of moral good and happiness in the creation, be the greatest good, which it certainly 
is, according to reason and divine revelation: yet a great degree of moral evil 
and of misery may be necessary, in order to produce the highest possible degree 
of this good; and therefore that system which includes this evil may contain the 
greatest good, and be infinitely preferable to any other possible one, in which 
there would be no evil. And that this is really so, we may be absolutely certain, 
since we have the infallible evidence before our eyes in the fact which has taken 
place, under the direction of infinite wisdom.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.iv-p87">It has been suggested by some, that this argument may not be conclusive: 
For though it be granted that infinite wisdom and goodness could not fix on a <i>
worse</i> plan, when there was a better possible; yet there may be two or more possible 
systems equally good; and if one of these be fixed upon, rather than the other, 
we cannot hence infer that this is the wisest and best. Therefore, though the system 
in which evil takes place has been actually fixed upon, we do not know that a system 
might not be equally good, in which there is no evil. And then it will not follow 
that it is wisest and best, on the whole, that evil should exist. Upon this the 
following things may be observed.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.iv-p88">1. If two or more possible systems be supposed to be exactly alike, 
in all respects, the supposition is inconsistent, and destroys itself: For if there 
be no kind or degree of difference , there are not <i>two</i> or more, but only
<i>one</i>. There cannot be two, where there is not, in any respect, the least diversity.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.iv-p89">2. But if there be any considerable diversity in any two or more 
possible systems, it is not to be supposed that they are, or can be, equally good 
and eligible, in the <pb n="117" id="iii.iv-Page_117" />sight of infinite, unerring wisdom. The least 
difference must render one more eligible than the other. But if not, if two different 
proposed systems be equally good, and eligible in the view of infinite wisdom, and 
this were possible; then, by the supposition, one could not be <i>chosen</i> and
<i>preferred</i> to the other; for, in such a case, it is supposed there is no ground 
of choice or preference: therefore no choice can be made. And if it were possible 
to choose the one and reject the other, there would be no wisdom in such a choice, 
it not being made from any reason or motive, or with any design. Indeed, such a 
supposed choice and preference is impossible, and therefore never did take place. 
It therefore could not be from choice, that one of two systems equally wise and 
good, exists, rather than the other, but must be from mere chance or accident, which 
is also impossible.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.iv-p90">3. If two or more possible systems, though different in some respects, 
might be equally good and eligible, and it were possible that one of these should 
be preferred and chosen before the other; yet it is not to be supposed, and it is 
really impossible, that two systems, so infinitely diverse and opposite as those 
must be, in one of which is infinite evil, and from the other all evil is excluded, 
should be equally good and eligible. The evil which has taken place in this world 
will continue forever, and in this respect is infinite; and all moral evil is infinite 
in its nature and criminality; aid the effects of this extend to all the views, 
feelings and exercises of moral agents; of all the subjects of God’s moral government 
and kingdom, without end, and render them, in many respects, vastly different from 
what they would have been, or could be, had there been no evil. And the divine perfections 
and conduct appear in a very different light to all intelligences from what they 
would have done; and circumstances and events in God’s eternal kingdom are, and 
will forever be, infinitely different from what would have been, if no evil had 
ever taken place. If this then be a good system, and worthy of the preference and 
choice of an infinitely wise Being, is it supposable, is it <i>possible</i>, that 
a system infinitely <pb n="118" id="iii.iv-Page_118" />
different from this, and diametrically opposite to it; in the great events of it; 
in the divine conduct; in the displays of the perfections of God; and in the views 
and exercises of all his subjects to all eternity, should be equally good; as well 
suited to display the divine character, and promote the holiness and happiness of 
the kingdom of God; and answer all the infinitely important and glorious ends, which 
are accomplished by the divine plan, which has actually taken place?</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.iv-p91">Surely, as there is an infinite difference in two such opposite 
systems, that which has been actually chosen by infinite wisdom and goodness is 
infinitely the best; and all the evil that takes place is the occasion of infinitely 
overbalancing <span class="sc" id="iii.iv-p91.1">good</span>, so that the former is wholly swallowed 
up by the latter; and, in this view and connection, is not evil, but good, being 
the occasion of infinitely more beauty, holiness, happiness and glory, in God’s 
moral, eternal kingdom, than could have been in any possible system, in which evil 
has no place. The evil involves so much good, and is so absorbed in it, that, all 
taken together, and in the view of infinite wisdom, there appears the greatest possible 
beauty, perfection and glory. As shades, which appear deformed and disagreeable, 
when they stand alone, being introduced into a picture, by the art of a limner, 
add to the beauty of it, and are absorbed in the beauty and perfection of the whole, 
of which they are the occasion.<note n="69" id="iii.iv-p91.2"><p class="normal" id="iii.iv-p92">If any one desires to see this subject more 
particularly and accurately considered, he must be referred to Mr. West’s <i>Essay 
on Moral Agency</i>.</p></note></p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.iv-p93">2, That all moral evil is designed by God to answer a good end, 
and is overruled for die greatest good, is evident from divine revelation. This 
is certain, if we can find <i>one instance</i> of this recorded in the Bible. For, 
if sin may be overruled for good, so that, on the whole, there is much more good, 
than could have been, had not that instance of sin taken place; then an infinitely 
wise and omnipotent Being <i>can</i> do it in <i>every instance</i>, and an infinitely 
good Being <i>certainly will</i> do it. Therefore though numberless instances of 
this might be produced from scripture history, but two or three will be mentioned, 
as sufficient to support the argument.</p>
<pb n="119" id="iii.iv-Page_119" />
<p class="normal" id="iii.iv-p94">The sin of Joseph’s brethren, in hating him and selling him, was 
overruled by God for great good, and appears to be an important and necessary part 
of his benevolent plan to bring about the good he designed for Joseph himself, and 
the people of Israel: Therefore it is said God sent Joseph into Egypt, and meant 
to accomplish good by it. The sin of Pharaoh, king of Egypt, in refusing to hearken 
to <span class="sc" id="iii.iv-p94.1">Jehovah</span>, and hardening his heart, and obstinately opposing 
the God of Israel, was designed by God for great good, and overruled to answer this 
end. The happy consequences of this instance of rebellion are too many to be mentioned 
here; and they will abide, and have influence, and a good effect to the end of the 
world; yea, to all eternity.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.iv-p95">It is sufficient for the present purpose to recollect what God 
himself says of this instance. “And in very deed even for this purpose have I raised 
thee up, that I might shew my power in thee, and that my name might be declared 
throughout all the earth: And I will get me honour upon Pharaoh and upon all his 
host.” He who is sensible of the desirableness, worth and importance of the display 
of the name and character of <span class="sc" id="iii.iv-p95.1">Jehovah</span>, surely will not say 
that the sin and ruin of Pharaoh was not the occasion of good, which infinitely 
overbalances the evil. And who can say that God hath not more glorified himself 
by the sin and ruin of Pharaoh, and that he is not the occasion of immensely more 
good to the church and people of God, than if he had been perfectly obedient? Who 
can say, or has any reason to believe that the sin and destruction of Pharaoh has 
not been, or will not be the occasion of so much good, of so great a manifestation 
of the divine character and glory, and of so much holy exercise and happiness of 
the friends of God, as his obedience, holiness and happiness would have been? Is 
it not rather certain that the contrary is true, and that to a degree beyond all 
conception? And therefore he was raised up, that by his sin and ruin he might, by 
the all directing hand of God, answer this infinitely important end. Had not Pharaoh 
existed just such an one as he was, and such as he is, and will be forever, the 
great and good end of which he is made the <pb n="420" id="iii.iv-Page_420" />occasion, could not have 
been answered; and had not infinite wisdom seen that such a character as that of 
Pharaoh was necessary in order to the greatest good of the whole, it would not have 
had an existence.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.iv-p96">We have another instance of this kind in the condemnation, sufferings, 
and death of the Lord of glory. This is an instance of sin, the most aggravated 
and criminal, doubtless, of any other that has ever taken place. And yet all this 
sin and suffering was foreordained, and actually took place, by the wise counsel 
and decree of God, because it was absolutely necessary in order to accomplish the 
most benevolent purposes of Heaven, and produce the highest good of the universe. 
In order to this, it was necessary that Christ should die on the cross; but this 
could not be, unless he died by the hands of sinful men. Had he not been thus put 
to death, there would have been no redemption of man, nor any of that remarkable, 
glorious display of the divine character, which is exhibited in this work. It was 
most certainly desirable, and of infinite importance, that all the sin should take 
place which was necessary in order to bring to pass this event, the suffering and 
death of Christ, which though infinitely evil, in itself considered, is of most 
happy and glorious consequence. All this sin and evil sinks into nothing, when compared 
with the good, the glory that follows; and the whole appears to be an infinite good; 
the evil being covered, and vanishing, in the splendour and glory occasioned by 
it, and with which it is connected. Better, infinitely better is it, that the Jews 
should commit that sin, and that Christ should thus suffer, than that the infinitely 
good and glorious consequences should not take place. And may it not with safety 
and the greatest assurance be added, it is better that all the sin and misery that 
ever has been, or will be, should take place, than that there should not be such 
a character as that of the Mediator; such works as he has done and will do; such 
manifestation s of the divine character, as he has made and will make; such happiness 
and glory; which will be the eternal consequence of redemption? But to return.</p>
<pb n="121" id="iii.iv-Page_121" />
<p class="normal" id="iii.iv-p97">If the sin of putting the Son of God to death was the occasion 
of the greatest good, which could not otherwise have taken place; and therefore 
God ordained that this should come to pass, for the sake of the infinitely overbalancing 
good J and brought it about, consistent with the freedom of man, and his own hatred 
of that sin, in itself considered, and the total inexcusableness and infinite ill 
desert of those sinners; then here is an instance of the most horrid wickedness, 
which is necessary to promote and bring about the greatest good; and, in this view, 
very desirable, and of infinite importance that it should take place. And it may 
be hence safely concluded, that every instance of evil that ever has been, or will 
be, is as really necessary to promote the greatest possible good; and, in this view, 
a desirable event; and therefore determined by the infinitely wise counsel and decree 
of Heaven, however undesirable, odious or detestable it may be, in itself considered.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.iv-p98">But that all the sins of men are overruled by God for good, and 
are appointed to take place for this end, may not only be inferred from the instances 
mentioned, and from many others; but it is expressly asserted in the following words 
of Sacred Writ, “Surely the wrath of man shall praise thee: The remainder of wrath 
shalt thou restrain.” If by the <i>wrath of man</i>, here be meant the furious exertions 
of sinners in their opposition to God and their neighbour, this comprehends all 
the sins of men, as they are all of the same nature. It is here declared as a most 
certain truth, that these sins of men, however numerous, and though they rise ever 
so high, shall turn to the praise of God, and promote his declarative glory. God 
will so overrule the sin of man, that he will get honour thereby: And that sin which 
would not answer this good and infinitely important end, he will not suffer to take 
place; but will effectually prevent it.—The following things are clearly contained 
in this passage,</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.iv-p99">1. That God does superintend and direct with regard to every instance 
of sin: He orders how much sin there shall be, and effectually restrains and prevents 
all that 
<pb n="122" id="iii.iv-Page_122" />which he would not have take place. Men are, with respect to this, 
absolutely under his direction and control.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.iv-p100">2. That all the sin which does take place shall answer the best 
and most important end; even that for which all things were made, the glory of God. 
“<i>Surely the wrath of man shall praise thee</i>.”</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.iv-p101">3. That therefore God wills and orders it to take place, that 
he may answer this end by it. If he effectually restrains and prevents that which 
will not praise him; it is certain that he could prevent all sin, if he pleased, 
and that he would do it, were it not necessary to answer this end; and that he wills 
the existence of it. not for its own sake, but for the sake of the end to be answered 
by it; or the good of which it is to be the occasion.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.iv-p102">4. From this it follows, that the sin of man is the means of a 
good which so far overbalances the evil of sin, and all the evil consequences of 
it, that it is desirable, on this account, that it should take place: Therefore 
there is more good in the universe, and this is a better world, than could possibly 
have existed, had no evil come into it; and every instance of sin and evil is conducive, 
and necessary to the greatest possible good of the whole.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.iv-p103">5. All this is here asserted in the strongest terms as a most 
certain and important, pleasing truth. The evidence and certainty of it are as clear 
and great, as of the existence of an almighty, wise and good Creator and Governor 
of the world. And it is a truth of the highest importance to be known, and believed 
with the greatest assurance, as it is implied in the exercises of true piety, especially 
in a joyful acquiescence in the divine government; joy in the supremacy and infinite 
felicity of God, and implicit cheerful trust in him: And as it is necessary to the 
support and comfort of the friends of God, in all the darkness and evil in this 
world; and the only proper ground of their rejoicing that the Lord God omnipotent 
reigneth; and that their God is in the heavens, and hath done whatsoever he pleased.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.iv-p104">Thus it appears demonstrably certain, both from the being and 
perfections of God, and from divine revelation, that all the evil which takes place 
in God’s world, <pb n="123" id="iii.iv-Page_123" />and under the influence of his government, is necessary 
in order to the greatest possible good; and is made the means of this; so that in 
this view, it is desirable, and perfectly agreeable to infinite wisdom and goodness, 
that it should take place just as it does. Therefore God, infinitely wise and good, 
has determined and decreed that evil should exist, as necessary to the highest perfection, 
beauty, happiness and glory of the system which was to be formed by his hand. Consequently, 
the evil which does actually take place, does not afford the least ground of objection 
against the doctrine of God’s decrees, by which he has foreordained whatsoever comes 
to pass; but is perfectly reconcileable to this doctrine: And this truth is the 
great support and ground of comfort to the truly pious mind, in the view of the 
abounding evil with which this world has been so long filled. God has foreordained 
all this, and all that ever will take place, for his own glory, and the greatest 
good of the universe: He superintends the whole, and brings good out of all this 
evil, infinitely greater good than could have been, without the evil. Therefore 
all is perfectly agreeable to the dictates of infinite wisdom and goodness.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.iv-p105">It is certain that evil, both moral and natural, is <i>in itself</i> 
undesirable, and must be considered as infinitely contrary to divine holiness and 
goodness, viewed in this light only; and could not possibly have place in a system 
formed by God, and absolutely under his direction and government, were it not necessary 
in order to the greatest good of the whole, to make the system in the highest degree 
perfect, happy and glorious: And, in this view and connection, the existence of 
evil is desirable, and must be introduced, if infinite wisdom and goodness dictate 
and govern. And all the children of wisdom will approve and rejoice. And very unhappy 
are they who are dissatisfied with die works and ways of God in the moral or natural 
world; and think they have wisdom enough to see many things defective and wrong; 
and to have ordered matters better, had they been to contrive and direct them. This 
seems to be the situation of those who make the objection under consideration; which, 
it is presumed, will appear to all who well <pb n="124" id="iii.iv-Page_124" />
consider what has now been said in answer to it, to be altogether groundless and 
unreasonable.<note n="70" id="iii.iv-p105.1"><p class="normal" id="iii.iv-p106">There have been many objections to what has been here asserted 
and proved, viz. <i>That sin is necessary in order to the greatest good of the whole, 
and is the occasion of good in every instance of it</i>. It has been said, that 
such a position gives the greatest encouragement to sin; for the more sin there 
is, the better, the more good there will be—That sin, according to this, is really 
no crime—That this is therefore inconsistent with its being forbidden in the law 
of God, and the punishment of the sinner, &amp;c.—The distinction which has been made 
between sin, considered in itself, in its own nature and tendency; and as it is 
connected with the whole, and as overruled and used by God for the greatest good 
of the universe, is sufficient, it is supposed, if well considered, to show how 
groundless such objections are. All sin is infinitely odious, in its own nature, 
and has the most evil tendency, as it consists in opposition to God, and his glory, 
and to all good; God’s law, therefore, which requires love to him, must condemn 
and forbid sin, as infinitely wrong, and odious to him. The sinner cannot take encouragement 
to sin, from the good of which God makes it the occasion; because this is no good 
to him, so far as he is inclined to sin; and therefore cannot be a motive to sin: 
Because it is directly crossing to all inclination to sin. A son who desires not 
his fathers honour, but is of a disposition to be gratified in his disgrace, could 
not be persuaded to rebel against his father, from the consideration that his father 
would get honour by it: But if he be a friend to his father, and to his honour, 
he will not, from this friendship, be induced to act like an enemy, and do that 
which tends to hurt and dishonour him. Therefore man never did do evil with a desire 
and design to promote the good of which God makes it the occasion, it being a contradiction, 
and therefore absolutely impossible. And as rebellion against God is as evil in 
its own nature and tendency, when God makes it the occasion of good, and the disposition, 
views and motives of the sinner are as vile and criminal, as if no good, but infinite 
evil were the consequence, the sinner is as blameworthy, and deserves punishment 
as much, as if no good, but all the evil which his sin tends to produce, took place. 
It is not thought necessary or proper to give a more particular answer to these 
objections here. This has been done in three sermons, on the subject of the good 
of which sin is the occasion, published in the year 1759, and reprinted in Boston, 
and at Edinburgh in Scotland, in 1773.</p></note></p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.iv-p107"><span class="sc" id="iii.iv-p107.1">Thirdly</span>, It is now to be considered, whether 
God’s foreordaining whatsoever comes to pass, does imply that he is the origin, 
cause and author of sin, in a sense which is contrary to infinite holiness, and 
therefore very dishonourable to him. This is confidently asserted by many; and they 
have on this ground exclaimed against this doctrine, and all that is implied in 
it; and represented it in a most shocking and horrible light. Therefore, though 
what has been said of the nature of sin, as consisting wholly in the disposition 
and will of the sinner, and of the good of which it is the occasion, which renders 
it desirable that it should take place, may serve to throw some light on this point, 
and show that God’s choosing and determining that sin should take place, as <pb n="125" id="iii.iv-Page_125" />
necessary to accomplish the greatest good, is a wise and holy choice: Yet it may 
be proper and important more particularly to consider this subject, and attend to 
it in the light in which it is set by the objection which has been introduced, and 
is now under consideration.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.iv-p108">We ought to attend to this point, and think and speak of it with 
care and caution, and in the exercise of fear and reverence of the infinitely great 
and holy God, lest, under the notion of thinking and speaking for him, and to his 
honour, our thoughts and words should be really against him, and tend to his reproach. 
And this caution and reverential fear ought to possess the minds of those who make 
the objection under consideration, as well as of those who believe and assert the 
doctrine against which the objection is made. For if indeed God has foreordained 
whatsoever comes to pass; then all objections against it, however plausible they 
may appear, are really replying against God, and very dishonourable and displeasing 
to him. But if, on the other hand, the objection be reasonable and well founded, 
they who believe the doctrine of God’s decrees, do really dishonour and displease 
him. We are happy that we have a revelation from God, in which this point, as well 
as every important one, is set in a clear and easy light; so that no man can, with 
this in his hand, run into an error concerning it, and be blameless. In the light 
of reason, and this revelation, let the following things be well considered.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.iv-p109">I. It is of importance to observe here, and fix it as certain, 
that when the origin or cause of evil is inquired after, or is ascribed to God, 
or any other being; the moral evil itself is not meant by the origin or cause of 
it. The origin or cause of any thing is necessarily <i>before</i> the thing which 
is the effect, and must exist and take place antecedent to the evil, and <i>before</i> 
the evil can exist. It is therefore certain that there can be no moral evil in the 
origin or cause of this evil, in whatever and wherever it may be found: For to suppose 
the contrary, is a direct and plain contradiction. Moral evil cannot be the origin 
or cause of moral evil, any more than any effect can be the cause of itself, or 
a child be the <pb n="126" id="iii.iv-Page_126" />
cause of his father. We, in considering what is the origin of moral evil, are going 
back to something which is antecedent to the evil, and where, or in which, no such 
evil does, or can be supposed to exist, to find the cause of moral evil, or a reason 
why it does take place, rather than not. We must go back, therefore, till we get 
to that in which there is no moral evil, before we arrive to, or can find that which 
is the origin or cause of it. If we find an existence, object or exertion, in which 
there is moral evil, we may be sure, we have not yet found, or arrived to the origin 
and cause of it; and must yet go a step farther back, even to that in which there 
is no moral evil, in order to find the origin of this evil.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.iv-p110">It hence follows that if man, or any creature is, in any instance, 
the origin or cause of sin, (meaning by <i>cause</i>, that which is antecedent to 
the existence of sin, and of which sin is properly the effect) that man or creature 
cannot be the <i>sinful</i> cause of that sin: And there is no moral evil in any 
conceptions, thoughts or exertions of such a creature, which are necessary to take 
place, antecedent to the existence of sin, and in order to it, whatever they may 
be, or if any be necessary.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.iv-p111">It is also certain that if God, the first cause of all things, 
be the origin or cause of moral evil; (and this can be proved, and may be asserted, 
as a most evident truth,) this is so far from imputing moral evil to him, or supposing 
that there is any thing of that nature in him, that it necessarily supposes the 
contrary; and that in being the first cause of moral evil, there is no sin; and 
therefore that he may be the origin or cause of it, consistently with infinite holiness, 
and exercise it in whatever exertions or influence may be necessary or implied in 
being thus the cause of sin.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.iv-p112">If any should say or imagine, that the thought, exertion, or influence, 
which tends to produce sin, and is in fact the cause or origin of it, must be itself 
sinful or wrong; this is only to contradict himself, and say that such exercise 
or exertion <i>is not the origin</i> of sin, but sin itself; consequently, as has 
been observed, we must go farther back to find the origin of <i>this sin</i>, till 
we find something in which there is no sin. And, according to <pb n="127" id="iii.iv-Page_127" />this 
notion, we must go back without end, and never find the origin of sin, unless sin 
itself be the origin and cause of all sin; which is a contradiction. It therefore 
still appears demonstrably certain, that if there be any origin or cause of moral 
evil, which is supposed by all those who inquire after it, there is no moral evil, 
nothing morally wrong in this cause, wherever it may be found, and whatever it may 
be. Therefore God, in foreordaining whatsoever comes to pass, may be, <i>in this 
sense</i>, the origin and cause of sin, consistent with infinite holiness; and the 
contrary cannot be supposed without a contradiction.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.iv-p113">If it should be said, “<i>There is no origin or cause of moral 
evil except what is in the evil itself</i>: It is the cause of itself, so far as 
it has any cause: Therefore the question concerning the origin of sin, meaning something 
antecedent to it, is groundless and vain, there being no such thing in nature. Moral 
evil has no cause, in this sense of cause.” Upon this it may be observed,</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.iv-p114">1. If this be admitted, then the objection under consideration, 
against the divine decrees, foreordaining all actions and events, as making God 
the origin, cause or author of sin, falls to the ground, and is given up: For, according 
to this, sin has no cause out of itself, or previous to its existence. But this 
cannot be admitted , for,</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.iv-p115">2. If moral evil may exist without a cause, there being no thing 
antecedent to its actual existence, which had any more influence or tendency to 
the existence of sin, than to the contrary; and there was no ground or reason of 
its existence, or why it should be, rather than not be, antecedent to its actually 
taking place; then there is an end of arguing from any effect whatever, to a cause; 
and we have not the least evidence that We ourselves, or any thing around us, or 
the world, have any origin or cause. For if moral evil may exist without a cause, 
so may every thing else which comes under our notice; and we have not the least 
evidence that there is a God, as the cause of the things which we behold. Which 
is not only directly contrary to the assertion of St. Paul, but to the reason and 
common sense of mankind <pb n="129" id="iii.iv-Page_129" />in general. And why should one choose to embrace 
such an absurdity, and assert that sin has no origin or cause, antecedent to its 
actual existence, and is the cause of itself, rather than to admit that God is the 
origin of it; since by admitting this, it is not supposed there is any moral evil 
in him; but the contrary is necessarily implied, as has been observed above?</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.iv-p116">It will, perhaps, be farther said, “It is not meant that sin has 
no cause whatsoever <i>in any sense</i>; but that it has no positive cause: It has 
a negative cause; and God may be the cause, in this sense, that is, he <i>permitted</i> 
moral evil to take place, by determining not to prevent the existence of it, when 
he had power to prevent it, had he been pleased to do it.”—Upon this the following 
remarks may be made.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.iv-p117">1. If God could prevent every sin that is committed, and yet has 
determined to permit all that takes place, which renders the event certain; then 
his determining to permit it, is really decreeing that it shall take place; or foreordaining 
that it shall come to pass: So that the objection that God’s foreordaining sin, 
makes him the cause and author of it, is not the least obviated by this supposition 
or scheme. And it may be worth while to consider whether any other supposed difficulty 
is removed by this. This leads to observe,</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.iv-p118">2. This does not in the least obviate what has been just observed 
upon the assertion that sin has no cause: For a negative cause is really no cause. 
Therefore to say concerning any existence, <i>It has no cause but a negative one</i>, 
is really denying that it has any cause. This therefore makes sin to exist without 
a cause or reason of its existence, rather than of its nonexistence. If the world 
has only a negative cause of its existence, then there is no cause of its existence, 
and no reason can be given why it does exist.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.iv-p119">Moreover, this notion of a <i>negative</i> cause of moral evil 
supposes some positive cause, by which sin would come into existence; a cause of 
sufficient force, and positive energy to produce this effect, unless the operation 
of it be counteracted by God, by preventing the existence of it, by a positive energy; 
and therefore it has actual existence, as an effect of this cause, by the <pb n="129" id="iii.iv-Page_129_1" />
determination of God not to hinder it. If an effect will certainly take place upon 
a mere permission, or not preventing it, it is necessarily supposed there is a cause 
sufficient to produce this effect, if not counteracted. And it must be now asked, 
what is this cause? Does it exist in God, or in the creature? If in the creature, 
from whence is the origin of this positive cause? Is its origin in itself; or in 
the creature? Or must we go back to the first cause? If either of the former be 
admitted, then we are again involved in the absurdity of sin being the cause of 
itself; or of a cause and effect existing independent of the first cause.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.iv-p120">3. Even this supposition, that God is only the negative cause 
of moral evil, were it consistent, and did not leave sin really without any cause; 
yet relieves no difficulty respecting the existence of sin. It will be asked, why 
God suffered sin to exist, when he could have prevented it? If we could account 
for its existence without any reason or cause of it, if permitted or suffered to 
exist, that is, if not prevented; how shall we account for God’s suffering it to 
exist? It is presumed all must agree in the following answer. <i>Because He, on 
the whole, all things considered, saw it best, or chose it should exist, rather 
than not</i>. And if so, he must, he certainly did, choose things should be ordered 
so ns to make its existence absolutely certain; and consequently did order them 
so, and did every thing that was necessary to be done, previous to the existence 
of sin, in order to render the existence of it certain. Indeed, if it be granted 
that God, on the whole, chose moral evil should exist (which all must grant, who 
allow that he has permitted sin) and that this is a wise and holy choice; such a 
choice implies his doing every thing that is necessary in order to render this choice 
effectual; and that God is wise and holy in willing or doing all this, whatever 
it may be. And all this is really nothing more than his choice or will that it should 
exist; as all that God did in creating the world, so far as we can conceive, was 
to will its existence, or say. Let it be; there being a certain connection between 
his willing the existence of any <pb n="130" id="iii.iv-Page_130" />thing or event, and the actual existence 
of it. He is in no other sense the origin or cause of any thing. And in this sense, 
it is granted by all who allow he permitted it, that he is the origin of moral evil.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.iv-p121">Some may, perhaps, think all which has been now said of the origin 
or cause of moral evil may be evaded, and proved to be nothing to the purpose, by 
observing, that sin is purely a <i>negative thing</i>; that it is so, at least, 
in its original and foundation; and therefore has no origin or cause; or, at most, 
can have nothing more than a negative one.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.iv-p122">On this it may be observed, that if it be meant that sin is a
<i>nonentity</i>, and has, properly and in truth, no existence, and therefore is 
really <i>nothing</i>; and if this can be proved, then certainly a negative cause, 
or, which is the same, no cause, is quite sufficient in this case, to account for 
that which is not an effect, and is really nothing: And the inquiry, and all assertions 
about origin, cause or effect, are nugatory and absurd.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.iv-p123">But will any man say, or can he believe, that there is nothing 
positive in moral evil, and that it has no <i>positive</i> existence? If such an 
one can be found, he must, if he will be consistent, say and believe that it is
<i>nothing</i> or that there is no such thing; for not positively to exist is non-existence; 
and what is this more than nothing? And why is not moral <i>good</i> or holiness 
a negative, or nonentity also? Reason and divine revelation join to assert both 
to have a real, positive existence. Is there not as real, positive existence and 
exertion in selfishness, or self love, as in benevolence, or love to God? Or in 
enmity against God, as in the highest exercise of friendship to him?</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.iv-p124">But may it not be urged, that it is indeed granted that sin has 
something positive in it, when it comes to actual exercise, and is exerted in opposition 
to God and man: But is not this consistent with its having a negative original, 
or arising from a privative cause?</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.iv-p125">Answer. If there could be sin where there is not, in any sense, 
the least exercise, which it will be difficult, if not impossible to prove; still 
this must be nothing, if a mere negative or privation; and can have no existence. 
And a privative cause is no cause. But granting that <pb n="131" id="iii.iv-Page_131" />
a negative or privative cause is a real cause, and that a negative effect, is a 
reality; yet, this does not account for this negative becoming a positive existence 
of its own accord, without any positive cause. If that which is merely negative, 
were any such existence possible, may start into positive existence, without any 
positive cause; then the whole world might come into existence without any positive 
exertion or cause. This supposition therefore does not appear to help the matter 
in the least, or to remove any difficulty.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.iv-p126">But it may still be asked, is not the true and only origin of 
sin overlooked in all that has been yet said? Is not the sinner himself the only 
true and proper cause of his sin, as he produces it, and there is no other cause 
or author of his sinful exertions?</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.iv-p127">Answer. If in this question it be meant, that he with whom moral 
evil is found is <i>the sinner</i>, and that we must not look beyond him, or out 
of him, to find the sin of which he is guilty; but that he is, in this sense, the 
origin, cause and author of all the sin that is found with him; it being his own 
act, which he has exerted voluntarily, and without any compulsion; and for which 
he only is blameable: If this be the meaning, it is granted the sinner is, <i>in 
this sense</i>, the sole cause and author of all the sin found with him; and we 
are not to look any farther for it. But still there is a reason why things were 
so ordered and disposed, as that he should thus sin, rather than not. Something 
must have taken place previous to his sin, and in which the sinner had no hand, 
with which his sin was so connected, as to render it certain that sin would take 
place just as it does. This is the origin or cause of sin, which the question we 
are upon respects, and concerning which inquiry is made: And in which it has been 
observed, there can be no sin, as by the supposition it takes place and is exerted
<i>before</i> the existence of moral evil, of which it is the origin or cause, and 
in order to it. Therefore, if we find that the great first cause of all things is,
<i>in this sense</i>, the origin of moral evil, by foreordaining whatsoever comes 
to pass, this does not suppose any moral evil in him, but the contrary; and is perfectly 
consistent with his infinite holiness, as has been before observed.</p>
<pb n="132" id="iii.iv-Page_132" />
<p class="normal" id="iii.iv-p128"><span class="sc" id="iii.iv-p128.1">Objection</span>. But after all the above reasoning 
about the origin of sin, which seems to prove that the first cause of all things 
is in a true and important sense, the cause of this evil; he having foreordained 
that it should take place, and disposed and done every thing that was necessary 
to be done, antecedent to the existence of sin, and in order to it, by which this 
event was made certain; and that in all this there can be no moral evil, but the 
contrary: Yet it will appear to the common sense and feelings of men, that to will 
the existence of sin, and to make any exertion or do any thing in order to it, in 
consequence of which it does actually exist, is wrong and sinful; and therefore 
infinitely unbecoming the supreme and infinitely holy Being. And to assert any such 
thing, or even to suppose that God is, <i>in any sense</i>, the origin of sin, is 
shocking, and fraught with impiety!</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.iv-p129">Ans. 1. It may be that many under the gospel, by not attending 
candidly and without prejudice to this subject, and not thinking closely upon it, 
nor making proper distinctions; and by habituating themselves to a wrong association 
of ideas on this point; may be shocked at the above representation; and feel as 
if it carried in it a degree of blasphemy; and yet, this not be any evidence that 
it is not agreeable to the truth, and consistent with the highest degree of real 
piety, and veneration for the Most High; and even the proper dictate and language 
of it.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.iv-p130">The Jews had, by education, and otherwise, imbibed such prejudices 
in favour of their temple and worship, and had habitually formed such an association 
of ideas, that they thought and felt that Stephen was guilty of blasphemy, when 
be intimated, that their place of worship should be destroyed, and the customs which 
Moses delivered to them be changed. And they were shocked, and stopped their ears, 
when he told them that he saw the heavens opened, and the Son of Man standing on 
the right hand of God. And when Christ said to the Jewish council, “Hereafter ye 
shall seethe Son of Man on the right hand of power, and coming in the clouds of 
heaven,” the high priest was so shocked, that he rent his clothes, and they all 
cried out, blasphemy! The present Jews, and those of many generations <pb n="133" id="iii.iv-Page_133" />
past, have thought it a piece of high impiety to pronounce the <span class="sc" id="iii.iv-p130.1">
Tetragrammaton</span>, as it is called; that is, the sacred name Jehovah, and shudder 
at the thought of doing it; and are to the last degree shocked to hear it done. 
This is the effect of a false association of ideas, and superstition, introduced 
by the force of education, by which it comes to pass, that the pronunciation of 
a name, which was spoken freely, and with the highest exercise of pious veneration 
of the Deity, by the prophets and holy men of old, is now considered by the Jews 
as an instance of shocking impiety.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.iv-p131">If we look into the popish world, we shall find innumerable instances 
of this kind. If a protestant pay no veneration to the host, and refuse to bow, 
and worship the <i>breaden god</i>, when it is carried in public procession, 
the populace will be shocked with a degree of horror: and it will be no wonder if 
he gets a broken head for his impiety. And if he do not worship and pray to the 
virgin Mary, and venerate her image; but speaks against it as idolatry, their <i>
pious feelings</i> are most sensibly excited, and they abhor the impious wretch; 
while he considers himself to be following the dictates of true piety in all this, 
and honouring the Most High.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.iv-p132">From these and many other instances of the same kind, it appears, 
that what is sometimes called the common sense and feelings of men, is not to be 
depended upon, in determining what is true or false; especially in those things 
which respect the Deity: And more especially, when the dictates of this sense and 
feeling are contrary to the most clear dictates of sober, sound reason, and to the 
plain and abundant declarations of divine revelation. For as that which is often 
highly esteemed among men, is an abomination in the sight of God; so that which 
is most important truth, in his sight, and honourable to Him, is in too many instances 
an abomination to men. This leads to,</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.iv-p133">Ans. 2. That God did will the existence of moral evil, in determining, 
at least, to permit it, when he could have prevented it, had he been pleased to 
do it, must be granted by all who would avoid ascribing to Him that imperfection, 
impotence, and subjection to that power, be it what it may, which introduced sin, 
contrary to his <pb n="134" id="iii.iv-Page_134" />will; which is indeed shockingly impious, and real 
blasphemy, to every considerate, and rationally pious mind. We may inter from this, 
with the greatest certainty, that it is, all things considered, or in the view of 
the omniscient God, <i>wisest</i> and <i>best</i> that moral evil should exist. 
For to suppose that it was his m ill that it should take place, or that he has permitted 
it, when he could have prevented it; and yet that it was not wisest and best in 
his sight, that it should exist, is beyond expression impious, and at once strips 
the Deity of all moral good or holiness; and gives him the most odious and horrid 
character!</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.iv-p134">But if God did will and choose that sin should exist, this being, 
on the whole, most agreeable to his holiness or his infinite wisdom and goodness; 
this necessarily implies, as has been before observed, ail that energy, exertion 
and disposal of things, that is necessary, previous to the existence of sin, in 
order to its actually taking place; and without which it could not have existed. 
For there is an infallible connection between the will of God that sin shall exist, 
and the actual existence of it; and this will of God is the cause or reason why 
it has taken place, rather than not. And if it be wise and holy to will and determine 
the existence of moral evil, it is wise and holy to order and do every thing which 
must be ordered and done, antecedent to its existence, in order to its taking place, 
be that what it may: And not to order, dispose and do all that, would be contrary 
to wisdom and holiness. Therefore, to assert that God is, <i>in this sense</i>, 
and <i>so far</i> the origin and cause of sin, is so far from imputing any thing 
dishonourable to him, that it is the only way in which his infinite wisdom and holiness 
can be consistently asserted and maintained: and to assert the contrary is highly 
impious, and very opposite to the sense and feelings of the pious mind of him who 
is truly judicious, sensible and discerning.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.iv-p135">The sum of what has been said on this point may be expressed in 
the following words. Moral evil could not exist, unless it were the will of God, 
and his choice, that it should exist, rather than not. And from this it is certain, 
that it is wisest and best, in his view, that sin should exist. And in thus willing 
what was wisest and <pb n="135" id="iii.iv-Page_135" />best, and foreordaining that it should come to 
pass, God exercised his wisdom and goodness; and in this view and sense, is really 
the origin and cause of moral evil; as really as he is of the existence of any thing 
which he wills; however inconceivable the mode and manner of the origin and existence 
of this event may be; and however different from that of any other.<note n="71" id="iii.iv-p135.1"><p class="normal" id="iii.iv-p136">“If by the <i>author of sin</i> is meant the permitter, or a not 
hinderer of sin: and at the same time, a disposer of the state of events, in such 
a manner, for wise, holy, and most excellent ends and purposes, that sin infallibly 
follows; I say, if this be all that is meant, by being the author of sin, I do not 
deny that God is the author of sin, (tho’ I dislike and reject the phrase, as that 
which, by use and custom, is apt to carry another sense) It is no reproach for the 
Most High to be thus the author of sin. This is not to be the actor of sin, but 
on the contrary, of <i>holiness</i>. What God doth herein, is holy; and the glorious 
exercise of the infinite excellency of his nature And I do not deny, that God’s 
being <i>thus</i> the author of sin, follows from what I have laid down: And I assert 
that it equally follows from the doctrine which is maintained by most of the <i>
Arminian</i> divines.” <span class="sc" id="iii.iv-p136.1">Edwards</span>, <i>on Freedom of Will</i>. 
Edit. I. Part iv. S. xi. P. 254.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.iv-p137">“If it would be a plain defect of wisdom and goodness in a being, 
not to choose that should be, which he certainly knows it would, all things considered, 
be best should be, (as has but now been observed) then it must be impossible for 
a Being who has no defect of wisdom and goodness, to do any otherwise than choose 
it should be; and that for this very reason, because he is perfectly wise and good. 
And if it be agreeable to perfect wisdom and goodness for him to choose that it 
should be, and the ordering of all things supremely and perfectly belongs to him, 
it must be agreeable to infinite wisdom and goodness, to order that it should be. 
If the choice be good, the ordering and disposing things according to that choice 
must also be good. It can be no harm in one to whom it belongs <i>to do his will 
in the armies of heaven, and among the inhabitants of the earth</i>, to execute 
a good volition If the will be good, and the object of his will be, all things considered, 
good and best; then the choosing or willing it, is not <i>willing evil</i>. And 
if so, then his ordering according to that will, is not <i>doing evil</i>?” Idem. 
P. 267.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.iv-p138">It may be proper to observe here, that all which has been above 
asserted respecting the origin and cause of moral evil, is contained and fully expressed 
in the following words, in the Shorter Catechism. “The decrees of God are, his eternal 
purpose, according to the counsel of his own will, whereby, for his own glory, he 
hath foreordained <i>whatsoever</i> comes to pass. God executeth his decrees in 
his works of creation and providence. God’s works of providence are, his most holy, 
wise and powerful preserving and governing all his creatures, and <i>all their actions</i>.” 
And in their confession of faith, they say, “God, the great creator of all things, 
doth uphold, direct, dispose and govern all creatures, actions and things, from 
the greatest even to the least, by his most wise and holy providence, according 
to his infallible foreknowledge, and the free and immutable counsel of his own will, 
to the praise of the glory of his wisdom, power, justice, goodness, and mercy. “The 
Almighty power, unsearchable wisdom, and infinite goodness of God, so fur manifest 
themselves in his providence; that it extendeth itself even to the first fall, and 
all other sins of angels and men,<i> and that not by a bare permission</i>, but 
such as hath joined with it a most wise and powerful bounding, and otherwise ordering, 
and governing them, in a manifold dispensation, to his own holy ends.” It is here 
asserted that God hath foreordained, decreed and willed the existence of moral evil; 
for this has come to pass. And it is said God brings this decree or will of his 
into effect, by creation and his governing providence, by which he, in the exercise 
of wisdom and holiness, does powerfully govern his creatures, and superintend and 
direct, dispose and order <i>all their actions</i>. These assertions, which have 
been justly considered as essential to what has been called Calvinism, and are professed 
and espoused by all consistent Calvinists, have been strongly objected to by many, 
ever since they have been made and published, as full of impiety, and involving 
horrible consequences, making God the author of sin, &amp;c. It is therefore no wonder, 
when this same doctrine is revived, explained and vindicated, that the same objections 
should come into view, and be urged, as they have been heretofore.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.iv-p139">This is observed, with a view to rectify a mistake which some 
seem to imbibe, while they oppose the doctrine above asserted, respecting the origin 
and cause of moral evil: and yet do not consider or believe they are equally opposing 
the Assembly of Divines, and all who have espoused the confession of faith and the 
catechism composed by them; and not as a proof of the truth of the doctrine; for 
it is presumed this has been exhibited in what has been said above; and will be 
yet farther confirmed b/ what is to follow; and needs not the testimony of man for 
its support.</p></note></p>

<pb n="136" id="iii.iv-Page_136" />



<p class="normal" id="iii.iv-p140">II. <span class="sc" id="iii.iv-p140.1">Divine Revelation</span> must be examined 
carefully to find in what light this point is there represented; whether it does 
warrant any to say, God has foreordained the existence of sin: Or that he is in 
any sense the origin and cause of it. This ought to be done with fear and reverence 
of these sacred oracles; with impartial, upright hearts, and a religious concern 
and desire to think and speak according to <i>this word</i>, since they who do not 
“have no light in them.”</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.iv-p141">In order to obtain the light which is contained in the holy scriptures, 
respecting this subject, it may be of advantage to observe the following particulars.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.iv-p142">1. According to divine revelation, God superintends, orders and 
directs in all the actions of men, and in every instance of sin; so that his hand 
and agency is to be seen and acknowledged in men’s sinful actions, and the events 
depending on them, as really and as much, as in any events and actions whatever. 
Of this every person must be sensible, who has read the Bible with any proper attention 
and true understanding; as it is held up to view throughout the whole of it, and 
is suited to impress this idea on the mind of every one who reads it. All the historic 
part of the Bible, and the predictions of events, whether great or less, to be accomplished 
by the wicked agency of man; and of innumerable particular sinful actions of men, 
are an incontestible evidence of <pb n="137" id="iii.iv-Page_137" />
this. So are all the acknowledgments of the divine hand and agency, in the events 
brought to pass by the sinful conduct of men; which are too many to be particularly 
mentioned here. But the truth of this observation may perhaps be more fully illustrated, 
and set in a stronger point of light, by attending to the following passages of 
scripture.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.iv-p143">The very sinful deed of the brethren of Joseph, in selling him, 
which was the necessary mean of his going into Egypt, is represented as so ordered 
by God, as to be as really done by him, as if it had not been done by the hands 
and agency of these wicked men. Joseph says to his brethren, that God did it, and 
that he had a particular and good design in it. “God sent me before you, to preserve 
you a posterity in the earth, and to save your lives by a great deliverance. So 
now it was not you that sent me hither, but God, who meant it unto good.”<note n="72" id="iii.iv-p143.1"><p class="normal" id="iii.iv-p144"><scripRef passage="Gen 45:7,8-20" id="iii.iv-p144.1">
Gen. xlv. 7, 8, to 20</scripRef>.</p></note> 
“He sent a man before them, even Joseph, who was sold for a servant.”<note n="73" id="iii.iv-p144.2"><p class="normal" id="iii.iv-p145"><scripRef id="iii.iv-p145.1" passage="Psalm cvii. 17" parsed="|Ps|107|17|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Ps.107.17">Psalm 
cvii. 17</scripRef>.</p></note></p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.iv-p146">It is said, concerning Eli’s wicked sons, that “they hearkened 
not unto the voice of their father, <i>because the Lord would slay them</i>.”<note n="74" id="iii.iv-p146.1"><p class="normal" id="iii.iv-p147">
<scripRef id="iii.iv-p147.1" passage="1 Sam. ii. 25" parsed="|1Sam|2|25|0|0" osisRef="Bible:1Sam.2.25">1 Sam. ii. 25</scripRef>.</p></note> It is here asserted that by God’s ordering and direction, 
they disregarded the admonition of their father, as necessary in order to his destroying 
them.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.iv-p148">When Shimei cursed David, he acknowledges the hand of God in it, 
as much as if Shimei had done it in obedience to the divine command, or it had been 
done immediately by God himself. “So let him curse, because the Lord hath said unto 
him, Curse David. Let him alone, and let him curse; for the Lord hath bidden him.”<note n="75" id="iii.iv-p148.1"><p class="normal" id="iii.iv-p149">
2 Sara. xvi. 10, 11.</p></note> It is impossible David should express himself thus on 
this occasion, unless he viewed Shimei’s wicked conduct to be ordered and directed 
by God, so that his hand was to be seen in it, as, in this sense, the origin and 
cause of what took place.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.iv-p150">“And Absalom and all the men of Israel said. The counsel of Hushai 
the Archite is better than the counsel of Ahithophel: <i>For the Lord hath appointed 
to defeat the good counsel of Ahithophel, to the intent that the Lord </i><pb n="138" id="iii.iv-Page_138" />
<i>might bring evil upon Absalom</i>.”<note n="76" id="iii.iv-p150.1"><p class="normal" id="iii.iv-p151"><scripRef id="iii.iv-p151.1" passage="2 Sam. xvii. 14" parsed="|2Sam|17|14|0|0" osisRef="Bible:2Sam.17.14">2 Sam. xvii. 14</scripRef>.</p></note> This good counsel 
of Ahithophel was defeated by the folly of Absalom and the men of Israel; yet it 
is said, God had <i>appointed it</i>, to bring about his own purpose. His hand guided 
the whole affair, and superintended every motion of the hearts of those wicked men.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.iv-p152">“Wherefore the king hearkened not unto the people; <i>for the 
cause was from the Lord</i>, that he might perform his saying, which the Lord spake 
by Ahijah the Shilonite, unto Jeroboam the son of Nebat. Thus saith the Lord, Return 
every man to his house; <i>for this thing is from me</i>.”<note n="77" id="iii.iv-p152.1"><p class="normal" id="iii.iv-p153"><scripRef id="iii.iv-p153.1" passage="1 Kings xii. 15" parsed="|1Kgs|12|15|0|0" osisRef="Bible:1Kgs.12.15">1 Kings xii. 15</scripRef>, 
<scripRef passage="1 Kings 12:24" id="iii.iv-p153.2" parsed="|1Kgs|12|24|0|0" osisRef="Bible:1Kgs.12.24">24</scripRef>.</p></note> Here it is said, that God so superintended and directed in this affair, 
that he was the cause of that foolish and wicked conduct of Rehoboam; and that it 
was <i>from</i> him, as necessary to accomplish an important event, which he had 
determined and foretold. And who can say, that God is not, in the same sense, and 
as much, the origin and cause of every instance of sin, that he may accomplish his 
infinitely wise designs? Is not this passage alone a sufficient warrant for this? 
And if the divine character can be vindicated, in what is ascribed to him, <i>in 
this instance</i>, how can it be dishonourable to him to say, he so directs and 
orders with respect to <i>every instance</i> of sin, as that he is, in this sense, 
the origin and cause of it? When the enemies of Judah came to ravage and destroy 
that people and country, it is said, God sent them. “And the Lord sent against Jehoiakim 
bands of the Chaldees, and bands of the Syrians, &amp;c. and sent them against Judah 
to destroy it. Surely at the commandment of the Lord came this upon Judah, to remove 
them out of his sight.” What can be the meaning of this, unless it be that God superintended, 
ordered and directed all the motions and conduct of these wicked men: and so made 
them his instruments to destroy Judah? “Through the anger of the Lord, it came to 
pass in Jerusalem and Judah, until he had cast them out from his presence, that 
Zedekiah rebelled against the king of Babylon,”<note n="78" id="iii.iv-p153.3"><p class="normal" id="iii.iv-p154"><scripRef id="iii.iv-p154.1" passage="2 Kings xxvi. 2" parsed="|2Kgs|26|2|0|0" osisRef="Bible:2Kgs.26.2">2 Kings xxvi. 2</scripRef>, <scripRef passage="2 Kings 26:3" id="iii.iv-p154.2" parsed="|2Kgs|26|3|0|0" osisRef="Bible:2Kgs.26.3">3</scripRef>, <scripRef passage="2 Kings 26:29" id="iii.iv-p154.3" parsed="|2Kgs|26|29|0|0" osisRef="Bible:2Kgs.26.29">29</scripRef>.</p></note> 
Is it not here declared that God ordered the sinful rebellion of Zedekiah against 
the king of Babylon; and that his hand or agency <pb n="139" id="iii.iv-Page_139" />
was to be seen, and his anger with the inhabitants of Jerusalem and Judah, was expressed 
in this?</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.iv-p155">“But Amaziah would not hear; <i>for it came of God</i>, that he 
might deliver them into the hand of their enemies.”<note n="79" id="iii.iv-p155.1"><p class="normal" id="iii.iv-p156"><scripRef id="iii.iv-p156.1" passage="2 Chron. xxv. 20" parsed="|2Chr|25|20|0|0" osisRef="Bible:2Chr.25.20">2 Chron. xxv. 20</scripRef>.</p></note> 
It appears from the story that it was owing to the pride and folly of Amaziah, that 
he did not hearken to the admonition and advice of the king of Israel; and yet this 
was <i>of the Lord</i>. By his determination, direction and superintending influence, 
it came to pass, in order to answer his own wise purposes: and his hand was to be 
seen in the obstinacy of Amaziah, as really as in any event which takes place by 
the immediate exertion of divine energy. And if this instance of sin was <i>of God</i>, 
then every instance may be, and most certainly is so: And we are warranted to assert 
this, by the declaration before us, as well as many others of the same tenor to 
be found in holy writ.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.iv-p157">In the tenth chapter of Isaiah, God, by his prophet, addresses 
the king of Assyria, as <i>the rod of his anger</i>, and the executioner of his 
indignation, against the hypocritical nation of Judah and Israel; and says he would 
send him to punish them; though he in going and doing die work, would have no design 
or desire to accomplish the ends God intended to answer by his pride and cruelty; 
And therefore after he had accomplished his ends by him, he would punish him for 
that wickedness of which he would be guilty, and which was necessary to fulfil the 
purposes of God: And while he was as really an instrument in the hand of God, and 
as much under his influence and direction, and as dependent on him, in all his motions, 
as is the ax or saw, in the hand of the workman. There is no need of any comment 
to show that this passage represents God as ordering, directing and bounding the 
sinful actions of wicked men; so that they are answering his ends in what they do, 
and his hand is to be seen and acknowledged in their sinful motions and actions, 
as really as the hand and exertions of the workman is to be seen in the motion of 
the axe or saw, by which he executes his designs.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.iv-p158">In the same manner God speaks of Nebuchadnezzar, king of Babylon. 
He says, he would send and fecht <pb n="140" id="iii.iv-Page_140" />him, and the nations under his command; 
and by him utterly destroy Judah, and the neighbouring nations; and speaks of him 
as his instrument, or weapon in his hands to lay waste and destroy. “Thou art my 
battleaxe and weapons of war. For with thee will I break in pieces the nations, 
and with thee will I destroy kingdoms, &amp;c.”<note n="80" id="iii.iv-p158.1"><p class="normal" id="iii.iv-p159"><scripRef id="iii.iv-p159.1" passage="Jeremiah xxv. 9" parsed="|Jer|25|9|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Jer.25.9">Jeremiah xxv. 9</scripRef>.—<scripRef passage="Jer 51:20" id="iii.iv-p159.2" parsed="|Jer|51|20|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Jer.51.20">li. 
20</scripRef>.</p></note></p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.iv-p160">To the same purpose are the following words, “Behold, I have created 
the smith that blow eth the coals in the fire, and that bringeth forth an instrument 
for his work; and I have created the waster to destroy.”<note n="81" id="iii.iv-p160.1"><p class="normal" id="iii.iv-p161">Isaiah liv 16.</p></note> 
This is said to support and comfort the people of God, in all their dangers and 
troubles from evil men, telling them that they had no reason to be afraid of them, 
since they were made by him, to answer his ends; and they were absolutely in his 
hands: so that they should do nothing but what he ordered; and therefore could do 
them no real hurt.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.iv-p162">“And before these days, there was no hire for man, nor any hire 
for beast; neither was there any peace to him that went out, or came in, because 
of the affliction; <i>for I set all men every one against his neighbour</i>.”<note n="82" id="iii.iv-p162.1"><p class="normal" id="iii.iv-p163">
<scripRef id="iii.iv-p163.1" passage="Zech. viii. 10" parsed="|Zech|8|10|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Zech.8.10">Zech. viii. 10</scripRef>.</p></note> 
This warrants us to consider God’s hand, and efficacious influence, in all the hatred, 
quarrels and wars that take place among men.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.iv-p164">“Wherefore I gave them also statutes that were not good, and judgments 
whereby they should not live. And I polluted them in their own gifts, in that they 
caused to pass through the fire all that openeth the womb, that I might make them 
desolate, to the end that they might know that I am the Lord.” This has reference 
to the statutes and judgments which they made for themselves, and practised in their 
abominable idolatries, &amp;c. yet God says, <i>He gave them these</i> evil and destructive 
statutes and judgments; and <i>He polluted them</i>, in these abominable sacrifices, 
by which they polluted themselves. This strongly expresses his superintendency and 
agency in all this, in order to answer a wise and important end.<note n="83" id="iii.iv-p164.1"><p class="normal" id="iii.iv-p165"><scripRef id="iii.iv-p165.1" passage="Ezekiel xx. 25" parsed="|Ezek|20|25|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Ezek.20.25">Ezekiel xx. 
25</scripRef>, <scripRef passage="Ezekiel 20:26" id="iii.iv-p165.2" parsed="|Ezek|20|26|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Ezek.20.26">26</scripRef>.</p></note></p>
<pb n="141" id="iii.iv-Page_141" />
<p class="normal" id="iii.iv-p166">The crucifixion of our Saviour, and all the circumstances that 
attended it, are expressly and repeatedly declared to have taken place, in consequence 
of the divine determination and decree, foreordaining them; and by his direction 
and superintending hand. It was so important and useful, that this whole affair 
should be viewed in this light, that special care was taken to keep it in view. 
“Thinkest thou that I cannot now pray to my father, and he shall presently give 
me more than twelve legions of angels? <i>But how then shall the scriptures be fulfilled, 
that thus it must be</i>?” “But all this was done, that the scriptures of the prophets 
might be fulfilled.”<note n="84" id="iii.iv-p166.1"><p class="normal" id="iii.iv-p167"><scripRef id="iii.iv-p167.1" passage="Matt. xxvi. 53" parsed="|Matt|26|53|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Matt.26.53">Matt. xxvi. 53</scripRef>, <scripRef passage="Matt 26:54" id="iii.iv-p167.2" parsed="|Matt|26|54|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Matt.26.54">54</scripRef>, <scripRef passage="Matt 26:56" id="iii.iv-p167.3" parsed="|Matt|26|56|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Matt.26.56">56</scripRef>.</p></note> “But behold the 
hand of him that betrayeth me, is with me on the table. And truly the Son of man 
goeth <i>as it was determined</i>.”<note n="85" id="iii.iv-p167.4"><p class="normal" id="iii.iv-p168"><scripRef id="iii.iv-p168.1" passage="Luke xxii. 21" parsed="|Luke|22|21|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Luke.22.21">Luke xxii. 21</scripRef>, <scripRef passage="Luke 22:22" id="iii.iv-p168.2" parsed="|Luke|22|22|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Luke.22.22">22</scripRef>.</p></note> 
“<i>Him, being delivered by the determinate counsel and foreknowledge of God</i>, 
ye have taken, and by wicked hands have crucified and slain. And now, brethren, 
I know that through ignorance ye did it, as did also your rulers. But those things 
which God before had shewed by the mouth of all his prophets, that Christ should 
suffer, <i>he hath so fulfilled</i>.”<note n="86" id="iii.iv-p168.3"><p class="normal" id="iii.iv-p169"><scripRef id="iii.iv-p169.1" passage="Acts ii. 23" parsed="|Acts|2|23|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Acts.2.23">Acts ii. 23</scripRef>.—<scripRef passage="Acts 3:17,18" id="iii.iv-p169.2" parsed="|Acts|3|17|3|18" osisRef="Bible:Acts.3.17-Acts.3.18">iii. 
17, 18</scripRef>.</p></note></p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.iv-p170">Peter, in these passages, is careful to observe, that the death 
of Christ was part of the divine plan, which he had in his wise counsel determined; 
and had particularly foretold by the prophets; and which he had now fulfilled by 
their wicked hands, as it was necessary to be viewed in this light, in order to 
understand it, and see the reason and importance of this memorable event; And not 
consider it is an argument of the weakness and disappointment of the Saviour and 
his followers. Accordingly the disciples kept this constantly in view, and say, 
in a solemn address to God, “For, of a truth, against thy holy child Jesus, whom 
thou hast anointed, both Herod and Pontius Pilate, with the Gentiles and the people 
of Israel were gathered together, to do <i>whatsoever thy hand and thy counsel determined 
before to be done</i>.<note n="87" id="iii.iv-p170.1"><p class="normal" id="iii.iv-p171"><scripRef id="iii.iv-p171.1" passage="Acts iv. 27" parsed="|Acts|4|27|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Acts.4.27">Acts iv. 27</scripRef>, <scripRef passage="Acts 4:28" id="iii.iv-p171.2" parsed="|Acts|4|28|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Acts.4.28">28</scripRef>.</p></note>”</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.iv-p172">If God had <i>before</i> determined, or foreordained, that all 
this should be done, with every act of sin which was <pb n="142" id="iii.iv-Page_142" />necessarily implied 
in its being done; and his irresistible hand and operation was to be seen and regarded 
in all this; and the church did see and particularly attend to this, as matter of 
support, thankfulness and joy; and devoutly acknowledged all this, in a solemn address 
to God, in order to glorify him; all which must be owned to be true, as long as 
this passage is allowed to stand in the Bible: Then there can be no impiety, in 
believing and saying, that God has foreordained whatsoever comes to pass, and with 
his hand is executing his own wise purposes, in his governing providence, ordering 
and directing all the actions of men, even the most sinful, as well as others, for 
his own glory and the general good; and that his hand is to be seen in every event, 
and in every action of man, as really as if he was the only agent in the universe; 
yea, to view things in this light, and to have feelings and exercises answerable, 
is for the glory of God, is suited to support and comfort all his friends; and is 
implied in true devotion.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.iv-p173">2. The holy scriptures represent God as, in some way or other, 
moving, exciting and stirring men up to do that which is sinful, and which, in itself 
considered, and as done by them, is very displeasing to him.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.iv-p174">“And again the anger of the Lord was kindled against Israel,
<i>and he moved David</i> against them, to say, Go number Israel and Judah.”<note n="88" id="iii.iv-p174.1"><p class="normal" id="iii.iv-p175">
<scripRef id="iii.iv-p175.1" passage="2 Samuel xxiv. 1" parsed="|2Sam|24|1|0|0" osisRef="Bible:2Sam.24.1">2 Samuel xxiv. 1</scripRef>.</p></note> This, to which God is said to <i>move</i> David, was a 
great sin in him, and very displeasing to God. “<i>And the Lord stirred up</i> an 
adversary unto Solomon, Hadad the Edomite. And God stirred him up another adversary, 
Rezon, the son of Eliada.”<note n="89" id="iii.iv-p175.2"><p class="normal" id="iii.iv-p176"><scripRef id="iii.iv-p176.1" passage="1 Kings xi. 14" parsed="|1Kgs|11|14|0|0" osisRef="Bible:1Kgs.11.14">1 Kings xi. 14</scripRef>, <scripRef passage="1 Kings 11:23" id="iii.iv-p176.2" parsed="|1Kgs|11|23|0|0" osisRef="Bible:1Kgs.11.23">23</scripRef>.</p></note> “And the God of 
Israel <i>stirred up the spirit</i> of Pul, king of Assyria, and the spirit of Tilgath-pilneser, 
and he carried them away, even the Reubenites, and Gadites, and brought them unto 
Halah, &amp;:c.”<note n="90" id="iii.iv-p176.3"><p class="normal" id="iii.iv-p177"><scripRef id="iii.iv-p177.1" passage="1 Chron. v. 26" parsed="|1Chr|5|26|0|0" osisRef="Bible:1Chr.5.26">1 Chron. v. 26</scripRef>.</p></note> “Behold, I <i>will stir up the Medes</i> 
against them, which shall not regard silver, &amp;c.”<note n="91" id="iii.iv-p177.2"><p class="normal" id="iii.iv-p178"><scripRef id="iii.iv-p178.1" passage="Isaiah xiii. 17" parsed="|Isa|13|17|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Isa.13.17">Isaiah xiii. 17</scripRef>.</p></note> 
These passages express a divine agency, either mediate or immediate, on the minds 
of these persons, by which they were influenced and moved to those actions; and 
God is represented to be the first <i>moving cause</i> of what was done by them: <pb n="143" id="iii.iv-Page_143" />
And what he did, be it what it may, was antecedent to their volitions and actions, 
and the latter the effect of the former. And if their liberty and sin consisted 
wholly in their voluntary exercises, as has been proved; then they were as free 
and as blameable, as if nothing had been determined and done, antecedent to their 
determinations and choice, and as necessary to their taking place, whatever it was. 
And whatever is implied in God’s moving them, and stirring up their spirits to act 
as they did, it was only in order to bring to pass his infinitely wise, important 
and good purposes, or executing his holy decrees; and therefore was infinitely wise 
and holy; and directly contrary to the views, inclinations and designs of these 
wicked men: and therefore consistent with his abhorring their doings: his displeasure 
with them, and punishing them for their wickedness.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.iv-p179">3. Agreeable to the last particular, the scriptures represent 
God as moving the hearts of all men, just as he pleases; and even when they do that 
which is sinful.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.iv-p180">“Draw me not away with the wicked and with the workers of iniquity; 
which speak peace to their neighbours, but mischief is in their hearts.”<note n="92" id="iii.iv-p180.1"><p class="normal" id="iii.iv-p181"><scripRef id="iii.iv-p181.1" passage="Psalm xxviii. 3" parsed="|Ps|28|3|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Ps.28.3">Psalm 
xxviii. 3</scripRef>.</p></note></p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.iv-p182">“From the place of his habitation he looketh upon all the inhabitants 
of the earth, <i>He fashioneth their hearts alike</i>.” That is, He forms the heart 
of every one equally, of one, as well as another.<note n="93" id="iii.iv-p182.1"><p class="normal" id="iii.iv-p183">Psalm xxxiii 14, 15.</p></note></p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.iv-p184">“He turned their heart to hate his people; to deal subtilly with 
his servants.”<note n="94" id="iii.iv-p184.1"><p class="normal" id="iii.iv-p185"><scripRef id="iii.iv-p185.1" passage="Psalm cv. 25" parsed="|Ps|105|25|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Ps.105.25">Psalm cv. 25</scripRef>.</p></note> “Incline my heart unto thy testimonies, 
and not unto covetousness.”<note n="95" id="iii.iv-p185.2"><p class="normal" id="iii.iv-p186"><scripRef id="iii.iv-p186.1" passage="Psalm cxix. 36" parsed="|Ps|119|36|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Ps.119.36">Psalm cxix. 36</scripRef>.</p></note> “Incline not mine heart 
to any evil thing, to practise wicked works with men that work iniquity.”<note n="96" id="iii.iv-p186.2"><p class="normal" id="iii.iv-p187">
<scripRef id="iii.iv-p187.1" passage="Psalm cxli. 4" parsed="|Ps|141|4|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Ps.141.4">Psalm cxli. 4</scripRef>.</p></note> “<i>For God hath put in their hearts</i> to fulfill his will, 
and to agree, and give their kingdom unto the beast, until the words of God shall 
be fulfilled.”<note n="97" id="iii.iv-p187.2"><p class="normal" id="iii.iv-p188"><scripRef id="iii.iv-p188.1" passage="Rev. xvii. 17" parsed="|Rev|17|17|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Rev.17.17">Rev. xvii. 17</scripRef>.</p></note> These are the ten kings and their subjects, 
mentioned in the preceding context, who join to support the beast, and make war 
with Christ and his people. God is here said to put it in their hearts, to do this, 
so far, and so long, as this is necessary, in order to answer his ends, and fulfil 
his infinitely wise and important designs. This cannot import less than that God <pb n="144" id="iii.iv-Page_144" />
has the hearts of these kings, and all under them, so in his hand and under his 
direction, that he turns them as he pleases, to accomplish his purposes; so that 
he makes them answer his ends, in all their opposition to him. Agreeable to this, 
it is said, “The king’s heart is in the hand of the Lord as the rivers of water: 
He turneth it whithersoever he will.”<note n="98" id="iii.iv-p188.2"><p class="normal" id="iii.iv-p189"><scripRef id="iii.iv-p189.1" passage="Prov. xxi. 1" parsed="|Prov|21|1|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Prov.21.1">Prov. xxi. 1</scripRef>.</p></note> If God does turn 
the heart of the king, whithersoever he will; then his heart, his will and choice, 
is always and in every instance under God’s direction and control; and there can 
be no motion, determination, or exertion of his heart, which is not as God wills 
it to be. Every turn of his heart then is an event which God wills should take place, 
and therefore foreordained that it should come to pass just as it does. And God, 
in thus turning the heart, is in this sense, the origin and cause of every motion, 
choice or volition, in which the heart turns this way, or that. And if the heart 
of the king is thus in the hand of the Lord, and he turneth it whithersoever he 
will; then the hearts of all his subjects, yea, of all men, may be, and actually 
are as much in the hand of God. This is implied in the assertion under consideration. 
The heart of the king is mentioned, as he has great power and influence over others, 
and is most absolute and despotic, and commonly most obstinate and inflexible. Even
<i>his heart</i>, as well as the heart of all others, is in the hand of the Lord; 
wholly under his power and influence, and is turned by him just as he pleases. The 
same thing is asserted in many passages of scripture, some of which have been mentioned; 
as that of God’s representing the king of Syria as sent by him to distress Israel 
and Judah; and as an axe or saw in his hand, directed and moved by Him to execute 
his will; his speaking of other kings as raised up and sent by Him, to be his servants 
to do his pleasure; and <i>putting it into their hearts</i> to fulfil his will, 
&amp;c. But, in these words of Solomon this is asserted in the most express and strongest 
manner, of the heart of kings and of all men; so that it seems impossible not to 
understand, or to evade the truth here expressed: As no words, perhaps, can be devised 
to convey it in a more clear, unequivocal and decisive manner.</p>
<pb n="145" id="iii.iv-Page_145" />
<p class="normal" id="iii.iv-p190">All the objections made against God’s foreordaining all the moral 
evil that takes place, and his being, in this sense, and so far, the origin and 
cause of it, as has been asserted and explained above, do equally lie, and are as 
strong against this passage, and many others which have been mentioned, under this 
and former particulars.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.iv-p191">4. In Divine Revelation an <i>evil spirit</i> which is in men 
and takes place among them, is said to be <i>from God</i>; and to be <i>sent</i> 
or caused by him.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.iv-p192">“Then God <i>sent an evil spirit</i>, between Abimelech and the 
men of Shechem: And the men of Shechem dealt treacherously with Abimelech.”<note n="99" id="iii.iv-p192.1"><p class="normal" id="iii.iv-p193">
<scripRef id="iii.iv-p193.1" passage="Judges ix. 23" parsed="|Judg|9|23|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Judg.9.23">Judges ix. 23</scripRef>.</p></note> “But the Spirit of the Lord departed from Saul, and <i>an 
evil spirit from the Lord</i> troubled him. And it came to pass on the morrow that
<i>the evil spirit from God</i> came upon Saul.”<note n="100" id="iii.iv-p193.2"><p class="normal" id="iii.iv-p194"><scripRef id="iii.iv-p194.1" passage="1 Samuel xvi. 4" parsed="|1Sam|16|4|0|0" osisRef="Bible:1Sam.16.4">1 Samuel xvi. 4</scripRef>. <scripRef passage="1Sam 18:10" id="iii.iv-p194.2" parsed="|1Sam|18|10|0|0" osisRef="Bible:1Sam.18.10">
xviii. 10</scripRef>.</p></note>“Now therefore <i>the Lord hath put a lying spirit</i> 
in the mouth of all these thy prophets.”<note n="101" id="iii.iv-p194.3"><p class="normal" id="iii.iv-p195"><scripRef id="iii.iv-p195.1" passage="1 Kings xxii. 23" parsed="|1Kgs|22|23|0|0" osisRef="Bible:1Kgs.22.23">1 Kings xxii. 23</scripRef>.</p></note> “<i>The 
Lord hath mingled a perverse spirit</i> in the midst thereof: And they have caused 
Egypt to err in every work thereof.”<note n="102" id="iii.iv-p195.2"><p class="normal" id="iii.iv-p196"><scripRef id="iii.iv-p196.1" passage="Isaiah xix. 14" parsed="|Isa|19|14|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Isa.19.14">Isaiah xix. 14</scripRef>.</p></note> 
Whatever be meant by an <i>evil, lying</i> and <i>perverse</i> spirit, whether it 
be no more than the evil inclination and exercise of the hearts of men; or an evil 
agent, distinct from their spirits, exciting them to sinful exercises; God is in 
these scriptures represented as superintending and ordering <i>this spirit</i> to 
take place in men, as it did. And if he did this, and yet maintained his own infinitely 
holy character, and these men were notwithstanding, wholly free in their evil inclinations 
and conduct, and accountable and deserving of blame and punishment for them; which 
was most certainly the case: Then all the evil volitions of men may be, in the same 
sense, manner and degree, from God, consistent with all these. It is therefore easy 
to see, that all objections against the doctrine under consideration, may with equal 
reason be made against such declarations as these, which are found in the holy scriptures.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.iv-p197">5. God is said, in the scriptures, to order, send and effect the 
sinful deceptions and delusions of men. “With him is strength and wisdom: <i>The 
deceived and the deceiver are his</i>.”<note n="103" id="iii.iv-p197.1"><p class="normal" id="iii.iv-p198"><scripRef id="iii.iv-p198.1" passage="Job xii. 16" parsed="|Job|12|16|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Job.12.16">Job xii. 16</scripRef>.</p></note> “O Lord, why hast 
thou made <pb n="146" id="iii.iv-Page_146" />us to err from thy ways?”<note n="104" id="iii.iv-p198.2"><p class="normal" id="iii.iv-p199"><scripRef id="iii.iv-p199.1" passage="Isaiah lxiii. 17" parsed="|Isa|63|17|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Isa.63.17">Isaiah lxiii. 17</scripRef>.</p></note> 
“And if the prophet be deceived when he hath spoken a thing, <i>I the Lord have 
deceived that prophet</i>.”<note n="105" id="iii.iv-p199.2"><p class="normal" id="iii.iv-p200"><scripRef id="iii.iv-p200.1" passage="Ezekiel xiv. 9" parsed="|Ezek|14|9|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Ezek.14.9">Ezekiel xiv. 9</scripRef>.</p></note> “And for this cause <i>
God shall send them strong delusions</i>, that they should believe a lie: That they 
all might be damned, who believed not the truth, but had pleasure in unrighteousness.”<note n="106" id="iii.iv-p200.2"><p class="normal" id="iii.iv-p201">
<scripRef id="iii.iv-p201.1" passage="2 Thes. ii. 11" parsed="|2Thess|2|11|0|0" osisRef="Bible:2Thess.2.11">2 Thes. ii. 11</scripRef>, <scripRef passage="2 Thes. 2:12" id="iii.iv-p201.2" parsed="|2Thess|2|12|0|0" osisRef="Bible:2Thess.2.12">12</scripRef>.</p></note> According to these passages, the divine hand and agency 
are concerned in all the errors and deceptions which take place among men, by which 
many of them run on to destruction.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.iv-p202">6. In the scriptures, God is many times said to <i>blind the minds</i>, 
and <i>harden the hearts</i> of men. This is often ascribed to him, in the most 
express terms, without saying any thing to qualify, soften, or explain the expressions, 
or to intimate that they are not to be taken in their plain, natural meaning. These 
will be now produced, as worthy of particular attention.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.iv-p203">“And he said, go and tell this people, hear ye indeed, but understand 
not; and see ye indeed, but perceive not. Make the heart of this people fat, and 
make their ears heavy, and shut their eyes: Lest they see with their eyes, and hear 
with their ears, and understand with their heart, and convert, and be healed.”<note n="107" id="iii.iv-p203.1"><p class="normal" id="iii.iv-p204">
<scripRef id="iii.iv-p204.1" passage="Isa. vi. 9" parsed="|Isa|6|9|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Isa.6.9">Isa. vi. 9</scripRef>, <scripRef passage="Isa 6:10" id="iii.iv-p204.2" parsed="|Isa|6|10|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Isa.6.10">10</scripRef>.</p></note> 
We have this remarkable passage quoted in St. John’s gospel, in the following words, 
and applied to the Jews in his day. “Therefore they could not believe, because that 
Esaias said, He hath blinded their eyes and hardened their hearts; that they should 
not see with their eyes, nor understand with their heart, and be converted, and 
I should heal them.” Here those words in Isaiah, <i>Make the heart of this people 
fat and shut their eyes</i>, have the meaning of them given in the following words,
<i>He</i>, that is God, <i>hath blinded their eyes and hardened their hearts</i>, 
God is here said to do what Isaiah was directed to do; for the prophet was infinitely 
unequal to produce the effect, and could be only the instrument by whom God caused 
it to take place. In this view, and in no other, the Evangelist appears to have 
given the true sense of the passage, while he uses these strong and pointed expressions.</p>
<pb n="147" id="iii.iv-Page_147" />
<p class="normal" id="iii.iv-p205">“For the Lord hath poured out upon you the spirit of deep sleep, 
and hath closed your eyes. They have not known, nor understood: For he hath shut 
their eyes, that they cannot see; and their hearts, that they cannot understand.”<note n="108" id="iii.iv-p205.1"><p class="normal" id="iii.iv-p206">
<scripRef id="iii.iv-p206.1" passage="Isaiah xxix. 10" parsed="|Isa|29|10|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Isa.29.10">Isaiah xxix. 10</scripRef>.—<scripRef passage="Isa 44:15" id="iii.iv-p206.2" parsed="|Isa|44|15|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Isa.44.15">xliv. 15</scripRef>.</p></note> 
“Israel hath not obtained that which he seeketh for: But the election hath obtained 
it, and the rest were blinded,” (or <i>hardened</i>, as it is in the original,) 
“According as it is written, <i>God hath given them the spirit of slumber, eyes 
that they should not see, and ears that they should not hear unto this day</i>.”<note n="109" id="iii.iv-p206.3"><p class="normal" id="iii.iv-p207">
<scripRef id="iii.iv-p207.1" passage="Romans xi. 7" parsed="|Rom|11|7|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Rom.11.7">Romans xi. 7</scripRef>, <scripRef passage="Romans 11:8" id="iii.iv-p207.2" parsed="|Rom|11|8|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Rom.11.8">8</scripRef>.</p></note></p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.iv-p208">Those passages are now to be produced, in which <i>hardening the 
hearts of men</i> is expressly ascribed to God. This is done more than <i>ten times</i>, 
in the history of Pharaoh and the Egyptians. “But I will harden his heart, that 
he shall not let the people go.”<note n="110" id="iii.iv-p208.1"><p class="normal" id="iii.iv-p209"><scripRef id="iii.iv-p209.1" passage="Exodus iv. 21" parsed="|Exod|4|21|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Exod.4.21">Exodus iv. 21</scripRef>.</p></note> 
“And <i>I will harden Pharaoh’s heart</i>, and multiply my signs and my wonders 
in the land of Egypt. But Pharaoh shall not hearken unto you.”<note n="111" id="iii.iv-p209.2"><p class="normal" id="iii.iv-p210"><scripRef passage="Exod 7:3" id="iii.iv-p210.1" parsed="|Exod|7|3|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Exod.7.3">
Chap. vii. 3</scripRef>.</p></note> “<i>And he hardened Pharaoh’s heart</i>, that he 
hearkened not unto them, as the Lord had said.”<note n="112" id="iii.iv-p210.2"><p class="normal" id="iii.iv-p211"><scripRef passage="Exod 7:13" id="iii.iv-p211.1" parsed="|Exod|7|13|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Exod.7.13">
Ver. 13</scripRef>.</p></note> “<i>And the Lord hardened the heart of Pharaoh</i>, and 
he harkened not unto them; as the Lord had spoken unto Moses.”<note n="113" id="iii.iv-p211.2"><p class="normal" id="iii.iv-p212"><scripRef passage="Exod 9:12" id="iii.iv-p212.1" parsed="|Exod|9|12|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Exod.9.12">
Chap ix. 12</scripRef>.</p></note> “And the Lord said unto Moses, go in unto Pharaoh:
<i>For I have hardened his heart, and the heart of his servants</i>, that I might 
show these my signs before him: and that thou mayest tell in the ears of thy son, 
and of thy son’s son, what things I have wrought in Egypt, and my signs which I 
have done among them; <i>that ye may know how that I am the Lord</i>,”<note n="114" id="iii.iv-p212.2"><p class="normal" id="iii.iv-p213"><scripRef passage="Exod 10:1,2" id="iii.iv-p213.1" parsed="|Exod|10|1|10|2" osisRef="Bible:Exod.10.1-Exod.10.2">
Chap. x. 1, 2</scripRef>.</p></note> “<i>But the Lord hardened Pharaoh’s heart</i>, 
so that he would not let the children of Israel go.”<note n="115" id="iii.iv-p213.2"><p class="normal" id="iii.iv-p214"><scripRef passage="Exod 10:20" id="iii.iv-p214.1" parsed="|Exod|10|20|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Exod.10.20">
Ver. 20</scripRef>.</p></note> 
“But <i>the Lord hardened Pharaoh’s heart</i>, and he would not let them go.”<note n="116" id="iii.iv-p214.2"><p class="normal" id="iii.iv-p215"><scripRef passage="Exod 10:27" id="iii.iv-p215.1" parsed="|Exod|10|27|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Exod.10.27">
Ver. 27</scripRef>.</p></note> “And Moses and Aaron did all these wonders before 
Pharaoh: <i>And the Lord hardened Pharaoh’s heart</i>, so that he would not let 
the children of Israel go out of his land.”<note n="117" id="iii.iv-p215.2"><p class="normal" id="iii.iv-p216"><scripRef passage="Exod 11:10" id="iii.iv-p216.1" parsed="|Exod|11|10|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Exod.11.10">
Chap. xi. 10</scripRef>.</p></note> 
“And <i>I will harden Pharaoh’s heart</i>, that he shall follow after them; and 
I will be honoured upon Pharaoh, and upon all his host; that the Egyptians may know 
that I am the Lord.”<note n="118" id="iii.iv-p216.2"><p class="normal" id="iii.iv-p217"><scripRef passage="Exod 14:4" id="iii.iv-p217.1" parsed="|Exod|14|4|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Exod.14.4">Chap. xiv. 4</scripRef>:</p></note> 
“<i>And the Lord hardened the heart of Pharaoh</i> king of <pb n="148" id="iii.iv-Page_148" />
Egypt, and he pursued after the children of Israel.” ”<i>And I, behold, I will harden 
the hearts of the Egyptians</i>, and they shall follow them: And I will get me honour 
upon Pharaoh, and upon all his host.”<note n="119" id="iii.iv-p217.2"><p class="normal" id="iii.iv-p218"><scripRef id="iii.iv-p218.1" passage="Exod. xiv. 8" parsed="|Exod|14|8|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Exod.14.8">Exod. xiv. 8</scripRef>, <scripRef passage="Exod 14:17" id="iii.iv-p218.2" parsed="|Exod|14|17|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Exod.14.17">17</scripRef>.</p></note></p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.iv-p219">There are other passages in which God is said to harden the hearts 
of men, which are now to be mentioned. “But Sihon, king of Heshbon, would not let 
us pass by him, <i>For the Lord thy God hardened his spirit</i>, and made his heart 
obstinate, that he might deliver him into thy hands as appeareth this day.”<note n="120" id="iii.iv-p219.1"><p class="normal" id="iii.iv-p220">
<scripRef id="iii.iv-p220.1" passage="Deut. ii. 30" parsed="|Deut|2|30|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Deut.2.30">Deut. ii. 30</scripRef>.</p></note> “<i>For it was of the Lord to harden their hearts</i>, that 
they should come against Israel in battle, that he might destroy them utterly.”<note n="121" id="iii.iv-p220.2"><p class="normal" id="iii.iv-p221">
<scripRef id="iii.iv-p221.1" passage="Josh. xi. 20" parsed="|Josh|11|20|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Josh.11.20">Josh. xi. 20</scripRef>.</p></note> “O Lord, <i>why hast thou hardened our heart from thy fear</i>?”<note n="122" id="iii.iv-p221.2"><p class="normal" id="iii.iv-p222">
<scripRef id="iii.iv-p222.1" passage="Isaiah lxiii. 17" parsed="|Isa|63|17|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Isa.63.17">Isaiah lxiii. 17</scripRef>,</p></note> 
It might be safely and with good reason argued from these instances of God’s hardening 
the hearts of men, that God hardens <i>every heart</i> that is hard and obstinate; 
as no reason can be given why he should do this, in one instance, and not in another; 
or there is the same reason why the hardness and obstinacy of men’s hearts in general, 
and wherever it takes place, should be as really ascribed to God, as these instances 
which are mentioned; and there can be no objection against his hardening the hearts 
of all men, whose hearts are hard, that may not with equal reason be made against 
his hardening the heart of Pharaoh, and others concerning whom it is expressly asserted. 
But this is made certain, as the consequence is drawn to our hand, by one under 
divine inspiration. “Therefore hath he mercy on whom he will have mercy,
<span class="sc" id="iii.iv-p222.2">and whom he will he hardeneth</span>.”<note n="123" id="iii.iv-p222.3"><p class="normal" id="iii.iv-p223"><scripRef id="iii.iv-p223.1" passage="Rom. ix. 18" parsed="|Rom|9|18|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Rom.9.18">Rom. ix. 18</scripRef>.</p></note> 
The apostle in these words has reference to God’s hardening the heart of Pharaoh, 
whom he mentions in the words immediately preceding; and from this instance of God’s 
raising him up and hardening his heart, to answer his own infinitely wise purposes, 
he makes this inference: “Therefore hath he mercy on whom he will have mercy, <i>
and whom he will he hardeneth</i>.” Here every one of mankind is comprehended in 
those on whom God has mercy, and those whom he hardeneth; and it is asserted that 
he hardeneth all those on whom he will not have mercy, that is, all whose hearts 
are hardened. It must be farther observed,</p>
<pb n="149" id="iii.iv-Page_149" />
<p class="normal" id="iii.iv-p224">7. In the sacred scriptures, God is expressly said to <i>form, 
make</i>, or produce moral evil.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.iv-p225">“The Lord hath made all things for himself: Yea, even the wicked 
for the day of evil.”<note n="124" id="iii.iv-p225.1"><p class="normal" id="iii.iv-p226"><scripRef id="iii.iv-p226.1" passage="Prov. xvi. 4" parsed="|Prov|16|4|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Prov.16.4">Prov. xvi. 4</scripRef>.</p></note> Here God is said to make the wicked, 
not considered merely as men; but <i>as wicked</i>: for in this character, or as 
wicked only, are they the proper subjects of natural evil, or punishment. What less 
can his <i>making the wicked</i> mean, than his having some hand or agency, in some 
way or other, in forming their character <i>as wicked</i>? And is this any less 
or more, than his <i>willing</i> that there should be such existences as wicked 
men; because moral and natural evil are necessary, as necessary as any other existence, 
to answer the infinitely wise and important purposes of God, in the brightest display 
of his perfections? He has made them <i>for himself</i>, to put them to his own 
use, and by them to manifest his own character, his holiness, hatred of sin, &amp;c.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.iv-p227">“I am the Lord, and there is none else; there is no God besides 
me: I girded thee, though thou hast not known me: That they may know from the rising 
of the sun, and from the west, that there is none besides me. I am the Lord, and 
there is none else. I form light, <i>and create darkness</i>: I make peace, <i>and 
create evil. I the Lord do all these things</i>.”<note n="125" id="iii.iv-p227.1"><p class="normal" id="iii.iv-p228"><scripRef id="iii.iv-p228.1" passage="Isaiah xlv. 5" parsed="|Isa|45|5|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Isa.45.5">Isaiah xlv. 5</scripRef>, <scripRef passage="Isaiah 45:6" id="iii.iv-p228.2" parsed="|Isa|45|6|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Isa.45.6">6</scripRef>, <scripRef passage="Isaiah 45:7" id="iii.iv-p228.3" parsed="|Isa|45|7|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Isa.45.7">7</scripRef>.</p></note></p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.iv-p229">These words are addressed to Cyrus, who was not then born: But 
was to arise in the eastern world, to conquer the Babylonians, and to release the 
Jews from their captivity, and order the temple and Jerusalem to be rebuilt. He 
was born and educated where the God of Israel was not known, and where they were 
taught, that the good being who was the author of all good, was not the only power 
that reigned; but that there was an evil being or principle, which reigned so far 
as to counteract the good principle or being, and introduce all the evil, both moral 
and natural, which takes place; and of which he is the proper cause or author. The 
good principle, or being, they represented by light, and worshipped him before the 
sun or fire, considering it the brightest emblem of him, and in a peculiar manner 
possessed or inhabited by him. The evil being <pb n="150" id="iii.iv-Page_150" />
and the evil of which they supposed him to be the cause and author, they represented 
by, and called, darkness. There is an evident reference to these false and hurtful 
notions, in which Cyrus was educated, in the address to him, part of which has now 
been cited; in which <span class="sc" id="iii.iv-p229.1">Jehovah</span> declares them to be great and 
dangerous delusions, and repeatedly asserts, that he is the only Supreme God. “I 
am the Lord, <i>and there is none else; there is no other God besides me</i>. I 
am the Lord, <i>and there is none besides me</i>.” And then he asserts that he is 
the cause of all that which they ascribed to the evil being, which they believed 
in, and feared. “I form light, and create darkness; I make peace and <i>create evil. 
I the Lord do all these things</i>.”<note n="126" id="iii.iv-p229.2"><p class="normal" id="iii.iv-p230">The <i>Magians</i> began first in Persia, 
and there, and in India, were the only places where this sect was propagated, and 
there they remain unto this day. Their chief doctrine was, that there were two principles, 
one of which was the cause of all good, and the other the cause of all evil. That 
the former is represented by light, and the other by darkness, as their truest symbols, 
and that of the composition of these two, all things in the world are made. Therefore 
when Xerxes prayed for that evil upon his enemies, that it might be put into the 
minds of all of them to drive their best and bravest men from them, as the Athenians 
had Themistocles, he addressed his prayer to the evil god of the Persians, and not 
to their good god. The good god they always worshipped before the fire, as being 
the cause of light, and especially before the sun, as being in their opinion the 
perfectest fire, and causing the perfectest light <scripRef id="iii.iv-p230.1" passage="Isaiah xlv. 5" parsed="|Isa|45|5|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Isa.45.5">Isaiah xlv. 5</scripRef>, <scripRef passage="Isaiah 45:6" id="iii.iv-p230.2" parsed="|Isa|45|6|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Isa.45.6">6</scripRef>, <scripRef passage="Isaiah 45:7" id="iii.iv-p230.3" parsed="|Isa|45|7|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Isa.45.7">7</scripRef>. “I am the 
Lord, and there is none else; there is no God besides me; I girded thee, though 
thou hast not known me, that they may know from the rising of the sun, and from 
the west, that there is none besides me. I form light and create darkness, I make 
peace and create evil. I the Lord do all these things.” These words, being directed 
to Cyrus king of Persia, must be understood as spoken in reference to the Persian 
sect of the Magians, who then held light and darkness, or good and evil, to be the 
supreme beings.” Dr. Prideaux Connection, 9 Edit. p. 252, 253, 304.</p></note></p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.iv-p231">Does not God, in these words, expressly take to himself this character, 
and assert that he is the origin and cause of all evil? If so, then we have no reason 
to be afraid to think and speak of him- as such: but may consider ourselves as promoting 
true piety, and the honour of the only true God, while we believe and assert, that 
all evil is the consequence of his determination and will, that it shall exist, 
and is wholly dependent upon it; as without his will that it should take place, 
it could no more exist, than any thing else whatsoever. No one can devise stronger 
terms or language to express <i>this</i>, than that which is here used by God himself. 
How this appears to be consistent with the infinite wisdom and <pb n="151" id="iii.iv-Page_151" />holiness 
of the divine character, and most honourable to God, has been repeatedly shown, 
in what has been already said on this subject: and therefore it need not be again 
repeated here.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.iv-p232">But it has been said by many, -that moral evil is not meant by
<i>darkness</i> and <i>evil</i> in this passage; but only natural evil, or calamity 
and pain. Of <i>this</i> God may be, and is, the cause, but not of sin. To this 
the following reply may be made.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.iv-p233">1. The opinion to which this passage has reference had respect 
to moral evil as well as natural: yea, this was chiefly in view, as the former is 
the origin and occasion of the latter. And the evil being was considered as having 
the direction and disposal of moral evil; so that it originated from him as the 
cause. Therefore if this was designed to be excluded in the passage before us, which 
is spoken to Cyrus, and has reference to that notion in the east, respecting the 
cause of moral evil, as well as natural, it must have been done by an express exception: 
For without this, and as it now stands, Cyrus, and every one else, must consider 
it as included and intended, as well as natural evil. Nor can it be now excluded, 
without doing violence to the text; and at the same time really gaining nothing 
by it: For if it be allowed that moral evil is intended here, as well as natural, 
no more is really asserted than is expressed in many other passages in the Bible, 
as every one may be sensible, who will attend to what has been before produced from 
the scriptures, under this head.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.iv-p234">2. If it be granted that natural evil only is directly intended 
here; yet this will necessarily involve moral evil; for a great part of the former 
which takes place among men, is the natural and necessary result of the latter. 
It is effected by the exercise of men’s selfishness and lusts. “From whence come 
wars and fightings among you? come they not hence, even of your lusts, that war 
in your members?”<note n="127" id="iii.iv-p234.1"><p class="normal" id="iii.iv-p235"><scripRef id="iii.iv-p235.1" passage="James iv. 2" parsed="|Jas|4|2|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Jas.4.2">James iv. 2</scripRef>.</p></note> “But if ye bite and devour one another, 
take heed that ye be not <i>consumed</i> one of another.”<note n="128" id="iii.iv-p235.2"><p class="normal" id="iii.iv-p236"><scripRef id="iii.iv-p236.1" passage="Gal. v. 15" parsed="|Gal|5|15|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Gal.5.15">Gal. v. 15</scripRef>.</p></note> 
If therefore the divine Being has no direction and government of the wills and evil 
conduct of men, he cannot be said to create or produce, or <pb n="152" id="iii.iv-Page_152" />even to 
regulate and superintend natural evil. If God does not will, direct and order a 
war, which is wholly carried on by the exercise of men’s lusts; how can he be said 
to direct, will and order the attendant or consequent natural evil? How does he 
cause or produce the one, more than the other? In this view, we may turn to the 
words of the prophet Amos. “Shall there be evil in the city, and the Lord hath not 
done it?” Here <i>evil</i> is mentioned without restriction, confining it to natural 
evil: But if it be supposed that natural evil is particularly meant here; yet this 
implies moral evil: as the natural evil, the calamity, sufferings and distresses 
which take place in a city, are chiefly the concomitants or fruits of vice and folly. 
And if the Most High has no concern or hand in directing, ordering and producing 
the latter; how can he be said to produce or effect the former; or how can it be 
said to be done by him, since it is the necessary attendant and fruit of the sin 
of men; and it is really done by them, and they are as really the cause of natural 
evil, as they are of their own sin, as the former is involved in the latter?</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.iv-p237">3. It must farther be observed, that if natural evil only, be 
meant by evil in the above passages in Isaiah and Amos; yet there is as great, and 
the same difficulty, in accounting for God’s creating and doing this, as there is 
in accounting for his determining and willing the existence of moral evil: Or the 
same objections lie, and may be urged with as much reason, against God’s willing, 
causing and producing natural evil, which are or can be made against his willing 
that moral evil should exist.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.iv-p238">If this proposition can be demonstrated, and made plain to every 
one who will allow himself to think calmly on the subject; then all the objections 
which have been made against God’s foreordaining whatsoever comes to pass, and all 
that is necessarily implied in this, will fall to the ground; and the ways and labour 
which have been taken to construe the scriptures mentioned above, so as not to imply 
that God is, in any sense, the origin and cause of moral evil, lest they should 
be understood in a sense dishonourable to him, will appear to be needless, and unreasonable. 
Let this matter, then, be carefully considered.</p>
<pb n="153" id="iii.iv-Page_153" />
<p class="normal" id="iii.iv-p239">Natural evil is as really contrary to infinite goodness, as moral 
evil is; infinite goodness cannot be reconciled to it, considered in and by itself, 
but is infinitely opposed to it: And to suppose that God wills and causes it to 
take place, <i>for its own sake</i>, and because he delights in it, in itself considered, 
is as dishonourable to him, and does as much impeach and deny his goodness, as to 
suppose that he wills and causes moral evil, for its own sake, and because he is 
pleased with it, and delights in it. Yea, to say that God causes natural evil to 
take place, <i>for its own sake</i>, and because he is pleased with it, in itself 
considered, is to charge him with moral evil, or that which is infinitely contrary 
to infinite holiness or goodness, as really as to say that he causes moral evil 
because he is pleased with moral evil, as such.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.iv-p240">Therefore, if when God says in the passage under consideration, 
“<i>I create darkness and evil, I the Lord do all these things</i>,” this is to 
be understood of natural evil only; it cannot mean, that God causes this evil, for 
its own sake; for this necessarily supposes him to be an evil being; but he causes 
it to take place, he creates it, for some good end, and for the sake of the good, 
of which the evil is the occasion or means; and without which evil, the good could 
not possibly take place; so that on the whole, there is much more good or happiness, 
than could have been, had there been no natural evil. If natural evil could answer 
no good end, and were not necessary, in order to this, it could not be created or 
made to take place, or be permitted to take place, by an infinitely good Being who 
has the disposal of all things: But if it be necessary to answer the best end, and 
to promote and produce the greatest good of the whole; then it may be not only permitted, 
but created, or caused to take place, consistent with infinite goodness; yea, it 
is inconsistent with infinite goodness, not to do so.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.iv-p241">And who does not now see, that God may determine, order and cause 
moral evil to take place, and, in this sense, <i>create</i> it, consistent with 
his infinite holiness and goodness, if this be necessary for the greatest good of 
the whole, both moral and natural; yea, that God could, not be infinitely wise and 
good, if, on this supposition, he did not order and cause it to take place? If the 
divine <pb n="154" id="iii.iv-Page_154" />conduct can be vindicated in causing natural evil to take place; 
on the same ground it can be vindicated in causing moral evil to exist; and not 
one objection can be made against the latter, which may not equally, and with as 
good reason, be made against the former. For instance, if it should be objected 
against the latter, that to make God the origin and cause of sin, is to suppose 
moral evil is in him; for there can be nothing in the effect which is not in the 
cause: This may with equal truth and reason be said of natural evil. If God be die 
origin and cause of it, this supposes natural evil to be in him, and that he is 
infinitely unhappy and miserable; for there can be nothing in the effect which is 
not in the cause. Again, if it be objected, that if it be agreeable to the will 
of God that sin should exist, and he chose it should take place, and is therefore 
the origin and cause of its existence; then sin is agreeable to his will, and he 
is pleased with it: It may with as much propriety, and as good reason, be said, 
if God wills the existence of natural evil, and causes it to take place; then he 
is pleased with it, and delights in the misery of his creatures; consequently he 
cannot be a good, but a morally evil being. If the objector, to remove the difficulty 
that is urged upon him, should say, that God does not cause natural evil, for the 
sake of the evil, but for the sake of the good end to be answered by it; he may 
be asked, Why this, which is as true of moral evil, does not equally remove the 
difficulty respecting God’s being the cause and origin of that? If it solves the 
difficulty in one case, it must do so in the other. If God may order and cause natural 
evil, which, in itself, is infinitely contrary to his goodness, to exist, consistently 
with his goodness; then he may will and cause moral evil to exist, though it be, 
in itself considered, infinitely contrary to his holiness, and most odious to him: 
And no one can account for the former, without giving as good a reason for the latter. 
Is it not very unreasonable and most absurdly inconsistent, for men perpetually, 
and with great assurance to object and urge that against the supposition that God 
wills and chooses the existence of moral evil, which may be with as much reason 
urged against his willing the existence of natural evil; while <pb n="155" id="iii.iv-Page_155" />they 
allow he does will and cause the latter: And at the same time cannot tell how <i>
this</i> is consistent with the divine perfections, without offering a reason, which 
equally proves the <i>other</i> to be as consistent?</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.iv-p242">It has been said, that if it be best, on the whole, that sin should 
take place, as it is necessary to promote the general good, then sin is a good thing; 
and the more sin the better. Now, this may be with as much reason said of natural 
evil. If God order <i>that</i>, to answer a good end, then it is a good thing, and 
the more of it the better. The inference from the latter, is as well grounded, as 
from the former. In truth, it is in both instances utterly unreasonable. That which 
is in itself, in its own nature, evil, may by God be made the occasion of the greatest 
good; and this is so far from altering the nature of the evil, or making it less 
an evil, in itself considered, that if this should be the case, and it were possible, 
the end to be answered by it would be defeated, and there would be no evil, to be 
the occasion of good. It is indeed a good thing, that evil, both moral and natural, 
should take place; and the good of which this is the occasion swallows up the evil, 
and the whole taken together is the most complete, perfectly beautiful, and good 
system: But this alters not the nature of the evil, and it is still as evil, as 
contrary to all good, and as disagreeable and hateful, <i>considered in itself</i>, 
and as unconnected with the whole, as if it were not made the occasion of good; 
but of evil. But this has been often brought into view before. It is again introduced, 
to show the unreasonableness of the objection, and that it is as much against the 
existence of natural evil, in order to answer a good end, as it is against the existence 
of moral evil, for the same end. The infinitely wise Being most perfectly knows 
how much evil, both natural and moral, and what particular instances of it, are 
necessary, in order to accomplish the greatest possible good; and all this takes 
place by his decree and will, and no more. The existence of just so much, and no 
more, is desirable, as it is necessary to accomplish the best end: But God will 
not suffer any more to exist; the remainder he will effectually restrain. If he 
did not, and more than is necessary to answer the best ends should take place, <pb n="156" id="iii.iv-Page_156" />
it would be infinitely undesirable and evil, and inconsistent with the divine perfections. 
How unreasonable then is it to say, “If evil be necessary for the good of 
the whole, and thus answers a good end, then the more evil the better!”</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.iv-p243">It has been farther objected, that if God wills the existence 
of sin, and it is therefore agreeable to his will that it should take place in every 
instance, when and wherever it does; then the sinner does not resist his will in 
sinning, nor can be blameable for it; but rather ought to sin, that good may come. 
Let it now be carefully and with impartiality considered, whether this objection 
may not with just as good reason be urged against God’s willing and causing all 
the natural evil which takes place. If any one, by his sin, cause natural evil to 
take place, by oppressing and afflicting the widow and fatherless, or by murdering 
his neighbour; or in any other instance; he voluntarily does that which is agreeable 
to the will of God, that it should take place. He has not resisted the will of God; 
but has complied with his will and designs: Therefore he cannot be blamed for it; 
but rather <i>ought</i> to do all this, since without his agency this natural evil 
would not take place, which God has determined should be done, because necessary 
to effect the greatest good, and accomplish his own wise design. In short, if God 
be pleased with the existence of that natural evil which is effected by the oppressor, 
murderer, &amp;c. then he cannot blame or be displeased with the oppressor or murderer, 
for being also pleased with the existence of this evil, and exerting themselves 
to produce it. Is there any way to answer this objection, and remove the difficulty, 
unless it be in the words of Joseph to his brethren? “As for you, ye thought evil 
against me; but God meant it unto good:”<note n="129" id="iii.iv-p243.1"><p class="normal" id="iii.iv-p244"><scripRef id="iii.iv-p244.1" passage="Gen. l. 20" parsed="|Gen|50|20|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Gen.50.20">Gen. l. 20</scripRef>.</p></note> There was a direct 
and total opposition and contrariety between the will of God that this evil should 
take place, and the will and design of Joseph’s brethren, in desiring and effecting 
this natural evil, consisting in his being made a slave in Egypt. God ordered it, 
and took measures effectually to produce the evil, not from any pleasure in the 
evil itself; but in the exercise of his 
<pb n="157" id="iii.iv-Page_157" />infinite goodness, because it was necessary to accomplish the greatest 
good of which this evil was the occasion. “He meant it unto good.” But the 
brethren of Joseph, thought and designed evil against him: They did it in the exercise 
of malevolence, or ill will towards him; which was most unreasonable, and was in 
the nature of it, enmity against that good, for the sake of which God ordered this 
evil to take place; and therefore was directly opposed to that benevolent will of 
God, which determined and ordered this evil. Their disposition and will in this 
affair were just as opposite to the disposition and will of God in determining and 
willing the existence of this evil, as malevolence is to benevolence and goodness, 
or as evil is to good; and therefore must be displeasing and hateful to God; and 
they as blameable in his sight, as if he had brought no good out of it, and nothing 
but evil had taken place. As this is the only solution of the difficulty, and fully 
removes the objection respecting God’s willing and causing natural evil; it is easy 
for every one who attends, to see that it equally answers the objection against 
his willing and causing moral evil: And shews how the existence of both may be chosen 
and caused by God, not for their own sake, but for the sake of the good end answered 
by them; and consistent with his hating them both, in themselves considered; so 
that in him it is an exercise of infinite benevolence; and therefore directly contrary 
to the disposition and will of the sinner in sinning, and in willing and producing 
natural evil. And consequently shews how justly God is displeased with the sinner, 
and blames him for willing and choosing, both moral and natural evil.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.iv-p245">These things have been observed to show that when God says “I 
create evil,” in the passage above cited, moral evil as well as natural may be intended; 
as there can be no difficulty or objection thought of, if the former be included, 
which is not equally against the latter; and if the former must be excluded, as 
inconsistent with the divine perfections, in any sense and view, to form and create 
it; for the same reason must the latter be excluded: And that moral evil must be 
intended, as well as natural, not only because nothing is said to exclude it; <pb n="158" id="iii.iv-Page_158" />
but because the occasion and design of the words do necessarily include both.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.iv-p246">The words of St. Paul seem to claim a place under this head. “Thou 
wilt say then unto me, Why doth he yet find fault? For who hath resisted his will? 
Nay, but, O man, who art thou that repliest against God! Shall the thing formed 
say <i>to him that formed it</i>. Why hast thou <i>made me thus</i>? Hath not the 
potter power over the clay, of the same lump <i>to make one vessel</i> unto honour,
<i>and another unto dishonour</i>?”<note n="130" id="iii.iv-p246.1"><p class="normal" id="iii.iv-p247"><scripRef id="iii.iv-p247.1" passage="Rom. ix. 19" parsed="|Rom|9|19|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Rom.9.19">Rom. ix. 19</scripRef>, <scripRef passage="Rom 9:20" id="iii.iv-p247.2" parsed="|Rom|9|20|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Rom.9.20">20</scripRef>, <scripRef passage="Rom 9:21" id="iii.iv-p247.3" parsed="|Rom|9|21|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Rom.9.21">21</scripRef>.</p></note> 
Upon these words the following observations may be made.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.iv-p248">1. The objection here introduced by the Apostle has reference 
to his assertion in the preceding verse, and is grounded upon it, “And whom 
he will he hardeneth.” And this same objection is made now, and always has been 
made by <i>men</i>, against the truth here asserted; which is, that it is the will 
of God, that all the hardness and obstinacy of heart which is found amongst men, 
should exist just as it does; and therefore he has foreordained, according to the 
counsel of his own will, that it shall take place. So much, <i>at least</i>, is 
expressed in these words of the Apostle; and indeed no more than what is implied 
in this: For whatever God wills to take place, has a cause of its certain existence; 
and this can be found no where but in the divine will. The objection is, “If all 
the sins of men take place by the will of God, and according to his will; then there 
can be no crime in sin; and men cannot be justly blamed for that, the existence 
of which is agreeable to his w ill.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.iv-p249">2. It is observable, that the Apostle in his answer to this objection, 
does not say that the objector had mistaken his meaning; and that he had not said 
that it was agreeable to the will of God that the hardness of men’s hearts, and 
every instance of obstinacy and sin, should take place just as it does; and therefore 
the divine purpose and agency was concerned in all this; but implicitly grants that 
this is a truth, and that he had asserted it; by not only not denying it; but proceeding 
to vindicate it in his answer; by which the meaning of his words is fixed beyond 
a doubt.</p>
<pb n="159" id="iii.iv-Page_159" />
<p class="normal" id="iii.iv-p250">3. In his answer he is so far from palliating what he had said, 
or softening down his expression, to which the objection is made, that he rather 
heightens it, and expresses himself in a stronger manner, if possible. “Shall the 
thing formed say to him that <i>formed it</i>, Why hast thou made me thus? Hath 
not the potter power over the clay, of the same lump <i>to make</i> one vessel unto 
honour, <i>and another unto dishonour</i>?” The potter makes one vessel as really 
and as much as another; that which is made to dishonour, and that which is made 
unto honour. Therefore, if the similitude is any thing to the purpose, and does 
not give a very wrong idea of the matter, which it is designed to illustrate, all 
sinners whose hearts are hardened, who are represented by the vessels made unto 
dishonour, are as really formed and made such as they are, hardened sinners, as 
the vessel unto dishonour is made a dishonourable vessel, by the potter: And God’s 
sovereign right to do this is here asserted; and he who objects to this, the Apostle 
says, speaks against God. Besides, the Apostle expressly asserts that the hardened 
sinner is formed and made so by God. “Shall the thing <i>formed</i> say to him that
<i>formed it</i>, Why hast thou <i>made</i> me thus?” Thus the Apostle speaks this 
out, and repeats it in the most express and pointed language, without fear of hurting 
any one by it; and with assurance that he is espousing the cause of God, and vindicating 
his rights and honour, in opposition to an apostate world.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.iv-p251">The Apostle, having asserted the sovereign right of God to form 
his creatures as he pleases, in the next words gives the reason of this, and mentions 
the important end he has in view, and answers, by making the wicked for the day 
of evil. “What if God, willing (or determined) to show his wrath and make his power 
known, endured with much long suffering the vessels of wrath, fitted to destruction: 
And that he might make known the riches of his glory on the vessels of mercy, which 
he had afore prepared unto glory? “</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.iv-p252">The following things are suggested by these words.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.iv-p253">1. That God does not harden sinners, or punish them, for the sake 
of hardening and making them miserable, or because he has any delight or pleasure 
in their sin <pb n="160" id="iii.iv-Page_160" />and punishment, considered in themselves, and unconnected 
with the end to be answered by them: But he does this to answer a wise and important 
end, which could not be answered in any other way; and to produce a good, which 
infinitely overbalances the evil, which is necessary in order to it.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.iv-p254">2. We are here told what this great all important end is, which 
God designs to effect; the good which is produced by the persevering sin, and destruction 
of men, who are the vessels of wrath. It is the manifestation and display of his 
own perfection; “To <i>show</i> his wrath, and <i>make his power known</i>: And 
to <i>make known</i> the riches of his glory.” That is, he does this for himself, 
for his own glory. This perfectly coincides with the words of Solomon, which have 
been mentioned, and serves to fix the sense of them. “The Lord hath made all things
<i>for himself: Yea, even the wicked for the day of evil</i>.”</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.iv-p255">3. It is here supposed, that what God does in hardening sinners, 
and making them vessels unto dishonour, and enduring with much long suffering these 
vessels of wrath, fitted for destruction, is consistent with their being blameable 
for their hardness, and every thing which renders them dishonourable: and with his 
being highly displeased with them for it; and that he may justly destroy them forever, 
for their hardness and obstinacy in sin. This is supposed, and really asserted, 
in the words; for, in any other view, they would be inconsistent and absurd; as 
otherwise, sinners could not be <i>vessels of wrath, fitted to destruction</i>. 
Whatever <i>men</i> have thought, and may think and assert, St. Paul, and he by 
whom he was inspired, <i>knew</i> that both these are perfectly consistent. How 
these things are consistent, does appear, it is hoped, from what has been said above, 
and may be yet farther offered, on this head.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.iv-p256">Having thus considered what is the language of scripture on this 
point, and made particular remarks on the passages which have been adduced; some 
more general observations on the whole, in one general view of them, must now be 
made, hoping they may serve to throw farther light on the subject, and confirm the 
truth exhibited respecting it in divine revelation, which has been so difficult 
and intricate to many.</p>
<pb n="161" id="iii.iv-Page_161" />
<p class="normal" id="iii.iv-p257">1. It appears from these passages of scripture, that God has foreordained 
all the moral evil which does take place; and is, in such a sense, and so far, the 
origin and cause of it, that he is said to bring it to pass, by his own agency. 
Therefore it is not bold or dangerous to believe and assert this; but it is for 
the honour of God, and tends to promote the good of men: And to believe and assert 
the contrary, is directly the reverse, bold, dangerous, dishonourable to God, and 
hurtful to man. It is safe to speak according to the scriptures; and so far as any 
man does not, it is because, in that instance, there is no light in him.<note n="131" id="iii.iv-p257.1"><p class="normal" id="iii.iv-p258">“Beza 
well expresses it, <span lang="LA" id="iii.iv-p258.1">Qui sequitur Deum, emendate fane loquitur.</span> 
We need not fear falling into any impropriety of speech, when we use the language 
which God has taught.” <i>Doddridge’s Note on Luke</i> xxii. 22.</p></note></p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.iv-p259">2. If these scriptures be understood, as many have chosen to understand 
them, as importing only that God <i>permits</i> sin, and so orders every thing respecting 
the event, that, <i>he permitting</i>, it will certainly take place just as it does; 
this really comes to die same thing, or if not, does not obviate any difficulty, 
which has been thought to attend the representation which has now been made of this 
matter. For they who choose this way of speaking do represent God as willing that 
sin should take place; or on die whole, preferring and choosing that it should exist, 
rather than not. And this, as has been shown, implies all that is intended by his 
being the origin and cause of sin; and ordering and doing every thing, that was 
necessary to be ordered and done, previous to the existence of sin, in order to 
render it certain, in every instance where it does take place. His decree turns 
the point in favour of the existence of sin: And his agency makes it certain, without 
which it could have no existence.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.iv-p260">And if God determined to permit all the sin which does take place, 
and by his agency orders things so, that, he permitting it, it will be done, this 
is liable to all the objections that have been, or can be male against the assertion, 
that all the sinful volitions of men are the effect of the divine agency. For the 
former makes sin as certain and necessary as the latter; and it is no more consistent 
with the holiness of God, and his <pb n="162" id="iii.iv-Page_162" />
hatred of sin, to will the existence of it, and lay a plan to have it take place, 
upon his permission, than it is, directly to cause it to exist in the creature, 
by any agency or exertion whatever, which is previously necessary to the existence 
of sinful volitions. And the former is not only liable to all the objections that 
can be made against the latter; but, so far as it differs from the latter, supposes 
an effect without any real origin or cause, and therefore involves the greatest 
difficulty and absurdity imaginable, as has been shown above. Why then is it not 
most reasonable, safe and best, to understand these scriptures in their most plain 
and obvious meaning, since by a strained or forced interpretation, no difficulty 
is removed, and nothing is obtained; and by explaining away the most easy and natural 
meaning, new and inextricable difficulties are incurred?<note n="132" id="iii.iv-p260.1"><p class="normal" id="iii.iv-p261"><span class="sc" id="iii.iv-p261.1">Calvin</span> represents those as very unreasonable, 
and perverting the scriptures, who insist that no more is meant than a <i>bare permission</i>, 
when God is said to harden the hearts of men, shut their eyes, &amp;c. He speaks of 
them as <i><span lang="LA" id="iii.iv-p261.2">frigidi speculatores, diluti moderatores</span></i>; 
to whose delicate ears such .scripture expressions seem harsh, and are offensive. 
They therefore, he observes, soften them down, by turning an action into a <i>permission</i>, 
as if there were no difference between <i>acting</i> and <i>suffering</i>, i.e. 
suffering others to act. He says, such who will admit of a permission only, suspend 
the counsel and determination of God, wholly on the will of man. But that he is 
not ashamed or afraid to speak as the Holy Spirit does: And does not hesitate to 
approve and embrace what the scripture so often declares, viz. That God blinds the 
minds of wicked men, and hardens thei4 hearts, &amp;c. See <span class="sc" id="iii.iv-p261.3">Calvin</span>’s 
Commentary on Exodus iv 21. <scripRef passage="Exod 7:3" id="iii.iv-p261.4" parsed="|Exod|7|3|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Exod.7.3">vii. 3</scripRef>.—<scripRef id="iii.iv-p261.5" passage="Joshua ix. 20" parsed="|Josh|9|20|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Josh.9.20">Joshua 
ix. 20</scripRef>—<scripRef passage="Rom 9:18" id="iii.iv-p261.6" parsed="|Rom|9|18|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Rom.9.18">Rom. ix. 18</scripRef>. See also
<span class="sc" id="iii.iv-p261.7">West</span>’s Essay on Moral Agency, page 241, 246.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.iv-p262">When the apostle Paul says, “And whom he will he hardeneth,” he. 
refers to the words of God, when he repeatedly says to Moses, that he would, and 
actually did harden the heart of Pharaoh: And he does not attempt to soften or alter 
the expression in the least, when he applies it to all who are hardened.</p></note></p>

<p class="normal" id="iii.iv-p263">In short, there appears to be no rational or consistent medium, 
between admitting that God, according to the scriptures, has chosen and determined 
that all the moral evil which does, or ever will exist, should take place, and consequently 
is so far the origin and cause of it: Or believing and asserting, that sin has taken 
place, in every view, and in all respects, contrary to his will, he having done 
all he could to prevent the existence of it; but was not able; and is therefore 
not the infinitely happy, uncontrollable, supreme Governor of the world; but is 
dependent, disappointed, and miserable! No one, <pb n="163" id="iii.iv-Page_163" />surely, will adopt 
the latter: How then can he avoid admitting the former?</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.iv-p264">3. If the scriptures which have been mentioned, where hardening 
the hearts of men, blinding and shutting their eyes, and inclining and turning their 
hearts, when they practise moral evil, &amp;c.—if these scriptures are to be understood, 
as meaning no more than that God orders their situation and external circumstances 
to be such, that, considering their disposition, and the evil bias of their minds, 
they will without any other influence, be blinded and hardened, &amp;c. then all those 
scriptures, which speak of God’s changing and softening the heart, taking away the 
hard heart, and giving a heart of flesh; opening the eyes of men, and turning them 
from darkness to light, and from sin to holiness, working in them to will and to 
do, and <i>causing</i> them to walk in his ways, &amp;c. may and must be understood 
in the same way, as not intending any special divine influence on the mind, as the 
origin and cause of virtuous, obedient, holy volitions; but only his using means 
with them in an external way; putting them under advantages, and setting motives 
before them; so that if they be well disposed, or will <i>dispose themselves</i> 
to obedience, they may be holy, &amp;c. To be sure, it cannot be argued from the expressions 
themselves, that the latter express or intend any more real influence on the minds 
of men, or divine agency, by which God is the origin and cause of virtuous exercises; 
than the former do with respect to men’s sinful exercises; for the expressions are 
as unlimited, plain and strong, which speak of the former, as those which are used 
for the latter.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.iv-p265">The <i>Arminian</i>, and all of his cast, understand the latter, 
as they do the former, as intending no internal, decisive influence on the mind, 
turning the heart or will one way, or the other; but ordering external circumstances, 
&amp;c. And are they not herein more consistent, than the professed <i>Calvinist</i>, 
who insists that the latter cannot be understood as expressing less, than that God, 
by his agency and influence on the minds of men, does actually produce all virtuous 
volitions, as their real origin and cause; while he as confidently asserts, that 
the former cannot mean any such thing; but understands them as <pb n="164" id="iii.iv-Page_164" />the
<i>Arminian</i> does: Were they consistent, they would give up the cause to the
<i>Arminian</i>, and own that the latter expressions may well be understood, as 
he understands them, and must mean no more, if the former do not. This is mentioned, 
it must be observed, as <i><span lang="LA" id="iii.iv-p265.1">argumentum ad hominem</span></i>, to 
convince these professed <i>Calvinists</i>, or whatever they choose to call themselves, 
that they are really inconsistent; and, in this point, are taking a measure to strengthen 
their opposers, rather than to convince or confute them. This leads to another observation.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.iv-p266">4. They who object to the divine agency being the origin and cause 
of sinful volitions, because, in their view, this is inconsistent with freedom and 
moral agency, in such volitions, and with any blame or crime in that which is the 
effect of such a cause; must, if consistent with themselves, reject the doctrine 
of the divine agency, as the cause of <i>virtuous volitions and exercises</i>, on 
the same ground, and for the same reason.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.iv-p267">If any kind or degree of supposed influence and agency, which 
is antecedent to a man’s volition, and the cause of its taking place, renders such 
volition not free, and not the man’s own volition and exercise, so that he is neither 
virtuous nor vicious in having and exerting such a choice; then there is no freedom 
or virtue in the exercises of those called good men, which are the effect of powerful 
divine influence, causing them to take place; But if such agency and influence, 
producing virtuous volitions in men, be consistent with the freedom of men, in such 
volitions; and they are as much their own exercises, and they are as virtuous, and 
as much their own virtue, as if they had taken place without such previous influence; 
or as they could be, on any possible supposition; then all this is as true of all 
contrary or sinful volitions of men, whatever kind or degree of influence and agency 
be exerted, antecedent to their existence, and as the cause of it.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.iv-p268">This observation is made for the sake of those, who make the above 
objection against there being any origin or cause of sinful volitions, antecedent 
to their existence; supposing this is inconsistent with man’s freedom and blame 
in such exercises: And yet they believe and assert, <pb n="165" id="iii.iv-Page_165" />that all virtuous 
exercises of men are the fruit and effect of divine influence, as their origin, 
which efficaciously causes them to take place; and that these exercises are as really 
and as much their own, and as virtuous, and praise worthy, as if they had taken 
place, without any such previous influence and cause, were this possible. It is 
desirable that this palpable, gross inconsistence of theirs might be discerned, 
and attended to by them; upon which they would drop this objection, as wholly without 
foundation, or urge it equally against the virtuous exercises of men, being the 
effect of any previous, divine, efficacious influence, as their origin and cause; 
and renounce it as inconsistent with the liberty a: id moral agency of men; by which 
they will be consistent with themselves in this point, however inconsistent they 
may be with the Bible.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.iv-p269">Both the one and the other is indeed equally and altogether consistent 
with human liberty, and with virtue and sin. No supposeable or possible influence 
or agency, previous to the exercises of the will, which is the origin and cause 
of such exercises, can render men less free in such voluntary exercises, or the 
less virtuous or vicious: And that because liberty consists, and is exercised in 
willing and choosing; and in nothing that does or can take place antecedent to the 
volitions of men, or as the consequence of them: And virtue and sin consist in the 
exercises of the will or heart, and in nothing else; and men are sinful or holy 
according to the nature and quality of these. These are most certain and evident 
truths, which has been in some measure shown above; and which ought to be always 
kept ill view, when attending to this subject.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.iv-p270">5. There is a certain connection between God’s hardening the hearts 
of men, and shutting or blinding their eyes, whatever this may be, or imply; and 
their voluntarily hardening their own hearts, and shutting or closing their own 
eyes; so that when or wherever the one takes place, the other does also.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.iv-p271">When God is said to harden Pharaoh’s heart, he is, at the same 
time, said to harden his own heart. God said to Moses, that he would harden the 
heart of Pharaoh.<note n="133" id="iii.iv-p271.1"><p class="normal" id="iii.iv-p272"><scripRef id="iii.iv-p272.1" passage="Exod. iv. 21" parsed="|Exod|4|21|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Exod.4.21">Exod. iv. 21</scripRef>.—<scripRef passage="Exod 7:3" id="iii.iv-p272.2" parsed="|Exod|7|3|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Exod.7.3">vii. 3</scripRef>.</p></note><pb n="166" id="iii.iv-Page_166" />
And it is repeatedly said, that he hardened his own heart, <i>as the Lord had said</i>,<note n="134" id="iii.iv-p272.3"><p class="normal" id="iii.iv-p273">
<scripRef id="iii.iv-p273.1" passage="Exod. viii. 15" parsed="|Exod|8|15|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Exod.8.15">Exod. viii. 15</scripRef>.—<scripRef passage="Exod 9:34,35" id="iii.iv-p273.2" parsed="|Exod|9|34|9|35" osisRef="Bible:Exod.9.34-Exod.9.35">ix. 34, 35</scripRef>.</p></note> 
referring to his saying, that he would harden the heart of Pharaoh. So it is said,<note n="135" id="iii.iv-p273.3"><p class="normal" id="iii.iv-p274"><scripRef passage="Exod 9:34" id="iii.iv-p274.1" parsed="|Exod|9|34|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Exod.9.34">
Chap. ix. 34</scripRef>.</p></note> Pharaoh sinned yet more, and hardened his heart; 
and in the first verse of the tenth chapter, the Lord said unto Moses, Go in unto 
Pharaoh; <i>for I have hardened his heart</i>; referring to the instance just before 
mentioned, of Pharaoh’s hardening his own heart. Hence it appears, that whenever 
God hardened the heart of Pharaoh, he hardened his own heart; and whenever Pharaoh 
did harden his heart, God did also harden it: And that this is true of every instance 
of hardness or obstinacy of the heart, God hardens the heart, and the sinner himself 
hardens his own heart.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.iv-p275">It does not follow from this, as some have thought it did, that 
God’s hardening the heart of Pharaoh, and his hardening his own heart, are one and 
the same thing. This supposition is contrary to the representation, and the express 
words. Here are two distinct agents, who are said to be concerned, and to act, in 
producing one and the same event, without which it could not take place, viz. the 
hardness of Pharaoh’s heart. As the agents are infinitely distinct and different, 
and their characters directly opposite to each other; so is their agency; that of 
God is holy, that of Pharaoh sinful. Yet the one necessarily supposes and involves 
the other. The agency ascribed to God, is the origin and cause of the hardness of 
the heart, without which it could not take place; and of which it is the certain 
consequence. The agency ascribed to Pharaoh, and which is to be ascribed to every 
sinner whose heart is hard, is the effect or consequence of divine agency, and consists 
wholly in this effect, that is, in hardness of heart. The heart cannot be hardened, 
or there cannot be a hard heart, without the agency of the sinner, hardening his 
own heart; for it consists in voluntary exercise; and therefore does not, and cannot 
take place, while men are wholly passive and do not act, or put forth those exertions 
in which hardness of heart doth consist.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.iv-p276">When God made man a <i>living soul</i>, the effect produced consisted 
in man’s activity, he <i>lived</i>; for life is not 
<pb n="167" id="iii.iv-Page_167" />merely a passive effect, but is itself action. Man could not be made 
a <i>living soul</i>, without life, or unless he <i>lived</i>, and he could not 
live, unless he were made to live; so that the one, is necessarily implied in the 
other. Yet life is as really life and activity, or man as really <i>lives</i>, and 
it is as much his own life and activity, as if he had lived without being created 
or made to live, were this possible. Every one cannot but see how false and absurd 
it would be to say, that God’s making man a living soul, and man’s agency in living, 
are one and the same thing, because one necessarily implies the other; so that to 
assert one, is, in effect, and really to assert the other: To say, that God breathed 
into man the breath of life, implies that man <i>lived</i>, and does really assert 
it: and to say that man <i>became</i> a <i>living</i> soul or lived, implies the 
divine agency in causing him to live, and does really assert it; though there be 
two different agents, and two very different kinds of agency, as distinct and different 
from each other, as if there were no connection between them, and the one did not 
imply the other.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.iv-p277">This is applicable to the instance before us. When God hardens 
the heart of any man, that man certainly hardens his own heart, or that hardness 
is his own chosen obstinacy; and were it not so, he could have no hardness of heart, 
or his heart could not be hardened. To suppose the contrary, is an express contradiction. 
Audit is as much his own chosen obstinacy, and his own crime; and he is as odious 
and ill deserving, as if his Maker had no hand or concern in the matter. When God 
hardens the heart, or exerts any supposable or possible kind or degree of influence 
or power, of which sin or holiness in the creature is the consequence; this is so 
far from being or implying any <i>necessitating influence</i>, impelling or forcing 
men to sin, or obey, that it is absolutely impossible there should be any such thing, 
antecedent to the actual existence of will and choice; and it is necessarily implied, 
that the disposition, will and choice, in which the sinner’s obstinacy consists, 
is the exercise of freedom, and his own choice. The will or heart is not capable 
of any such necessitating influence, by which it is <i>forced to act</i>, in opposition 
to acting freely; <pb n="168" id="iii.iv-Page_168" />because, as has been observed, exercise of choice 
or voluntary action and freedom, are the same thing. To talk of a necessitating 
influence by which the will is <i>forced</i> to act, which deprives a man of freedom, 
is just as absurd as to say, that a man is forced to <i>live</i>, without having 
any life; and so as utterly to exclude it.—But this has been considered before.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.iv-p278">To return, The observation to which we are now attending, viz. 
That whenever God hardens the hearts and blinds the minds of men, they do harden 
their own hearts and shut their own eyes; and the latter is necessarily implied 
in the former, as the former is implied in the latter; may be farther illustrated 
and confirmed, by several other passages of scripture; which, at the same time, 
will serve to throw some light upon them.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.iv-p279">The Lord says to Isaiah, “Go and tell this people, Hear ye indeed, 
but understand not; and see ye indeed, but perceive not. <i>Make the heart of this 
people fat</i>, and make their ears heavy, and <i>shut their eyes</i>: Lest they 
see with their eyes, and hear with their ears, and understand with their heart, 
and convert, and be healed.” These remarkable words are quoted, or referred to, 
no less than six times in the New Testament; and oftener than any other text is 
quoted from the Old Testament. In St. John’s gospel it is expressed in the following 
words. “Therefore they could not believe, because that Isaiah said. He hath blinded 
their eyes, and hardened their hearts; that they should not see with their eyes, 
nor understand with their heart, and be converted, and I should heal them.” In this 
quotation the expressions are as they are in the Prophet, though stronger and more 
decisively plain, if possible, representing the agency of God in blinding the eyes 
of men, and hardening their hearts. He is said to do this, and it is ascribed to 
him, as the cause; and nothing is said expressly of the agency of men in die matter. 
St. Paul is supposed to refer to these words, together with other passages, in the 
following passage. “The election hath obtained it; but the rest were blinded: 
According as it is written, <i>God hath given them</i> the spirit of slumber, eyes 
that they should not see, and ears that they should not hear, unto this day.”<note n="136" id="iii.iv-p279.1"><p class="normal" id="iii.iv-p280">
<scripRef id="iii.iv-p280.1" passage="Rom. xi. 7" parsed="|Rom|11|7|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Rom.11.7">Rom. xi. 7</scripRef>, <scripRef passage="Rom 11:8" id="iii.iv-p280.2" parsed="|Rom|11|8|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Rom.11.8">8</scripRef>.</p></note> 
Here he speaks, agreeable to the words in <pb n="169" id="iii.iv-Page_169" />Isaiah, and as St. John 
quotes them, of God as the agent, and of what he does, and he is represented as 
blinding men, giving them the spirit of slumber, eyes that they should not see, 
&amp;c. and nothing is expressly said of the agency of men. But he quotes these words 
on another occasion, in a different manner. “Well spake the Holy Ghost by Isaiah, 
the Prophet, unto our fathers, saying. Go unto this people and say. Hearing ye shall 
hear, and shall not understand; and seeing ye shall see, and not perceive. For the 
heart of this people is waxed gross, and their ears are dull of hearing; <i>and 
their eyes have they closed</i>, lest they should see with their eyes, and hear 
with their ears, and should be converted, and I should heal them.”<note n="137" id="iii.iv-p280.3"><p class="normal" id="iii.iv-p281"><scripRef id="iii.iv-p281.1" passage="Acts xxviii. 25" parsed="|Acts|28|25|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Acts.28.25">Acts xxviii. 
25</scripRef>, <scripRef passage="Acts 28:26" id="iii.iv-p281.2" parsed="|Acts|28|26|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Acts.28.26">26</scripRef>, <scripRef passage="Acts 28:27" id="iii.iv-p281.3" parsed="|Acts|28|27|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Acts.28.27">27</scripRef>.</p></note> In <scripRef id="iii.iv-p281.4" passage="Matthew xiii. 15" parsed="|Matt|13|15|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Matt.13.15">Matthew xiii. 15</scripRef>, these same words are quoted by Christ himself, 
just as St. Paul quotes them here. “For this people’s heart is waxed gross, and 
their ears are dull of hearing, <i>and their eyes have they closed</i>.” Here they 
are said to close or blind their own eyes, they are represented as active in the 
matter, and <i>their</i> agency only is spoken of expressly; and the divine agency 
is not mentioned: Whereas in the passages above produced, these same words of Isaiah 
are made to express, not the agency of those who are blind, in making themselves 
so; but the divine agency in shutting their eyes; so that their being blind and 
unbelieving, is ascribed to God. It is a question worthy to be considered. How these 
words in Isaiah can be consistently quoted so differently, and be made to speak 
of the agency of the sinner hardening his own heart, and closing his own eyes, when 
the Prophet expresses nothing but the divine agency, in hardening and blinding them, 
as they are quoted by St. John, and once by St. Paul?</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.iv-p282">Is not the only solution, and satisfactory answer to this question, 
contained in the observation made above, viz. That whenever God hardens the heart, 
and closes the eyes of men, they harden their own hearts, and shut their own eyes, 
the one being necessarily implied and involved in the other; so that when it is 
expressly said that God hardens the heart of any man, or hath given <pb n="170" id="iii.iv-Page_170" />
him eyes that he should not see, it is as really asserted, that the man himself 
hardens his own heart, and closes his own eyes, as the latter is necessarily implied, 
it being the very thing expressly said to be produced as the effect of the divine 
agency. Therefore when Isaiah speaks of God as hardening men’s hearts, and shutting 
their eyes, he equally asserts that these men harden their own hearts, and close 
their own eyes; and may justly, and with the greatest propriety be quoted, as asserting 
both of them, or either the one or the other.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.iv-p283">This is equally true of the light, wisdom and holiness; of good 
men, God is certainly the origin and cause of all this, according to the scripture. 
He circumcises the heart, to love him: He gives a new heart, and puts a new spirit 
in them; creates in them a <i>clean heart</i>, and <i>renews</i> in them a right 
spirit: He saves them by the washing of regeneration and the <i>renewing</i> of 
the Holy Ghost: He <i>causes</i> them to walk in his statutes, and to keep his judgments 
and do them.<note n="138" id="iii.iv-p283.1"><p class="normal" id="iii.iv-p284"><scripRef id="iii.iv-p284.1" passage="Deut. xxx. 6" parsed="|Deut|30|6|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Deut.30.6">Deut. xxx. 6</scripRef>. <scripRef passage="Psa 51:10" id="iii.iv-p284.2" parsed="|Ps|51|10|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Ps.51.10">
Psalm li. 10</scripRef>. <scripRef passage="Ezek 36:26,27" id="iii.iv-p284.3" parsed="|Ezek|36|26|36|27" osisRef="Bible:Ezek.36.26-Ezek.36.27">Ezek. xxxvi. 26, 27</scripRef>. <scripRef passage="Tit 3:5" id="iii.iv-p284.4" parsed="|Titus|3|5|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Titus.3.5">
Tit. iii. 5</scripRef>.</p></note>Yet the scripture speaks of them to whom God 
gives a new heart, and whose heart he circumcises, and whom he renews by his holy 
Spirit, as circumcising their own hearts; making themselves a new heart; as those 
who have put off the old man, and put on the new man; and renewed themselves in 
the spirit of their minds; and have cleansed and purified their own hearts.<note n="139" id="iii.iv-p284.5"><p class="normal" id="iii.iv-p285">
<scripRef id="iii.iv-p285.1" passage="Deut. x. 16" parsed="|Deut|10|16|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Deut.10.16">Deut. x. 16</scripRef>. <scripRef passage="Ezek 18:31" id="iii.iv-p285.2" parsed="|Ezek|18|31|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Ezek.18.31">Ezek. xviii. 31</scripRef>. <scripRef passage="Rom 12:2" id="iii.iv-p285.3" parsed="|Rom|12|2|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Rom.12.2">
Rom. xii. 2</scripRef>. <scripRef passage="Eph 4:22,23,24" id="iii.iv-p285.4" parsed="|Eph|4|22|4|24" osisRef="Bible:Eph.4.22-Eph.4.24">Eph. iv. 22, 23, 24</scripRef>. <scripRef passage="1Peter 1:22" id="iii.iv-p285.5" parsed="|1Pet|1|22|0|0" osisRef="Bible:1Pet.1.22">
1 Peter i. 22</scripRef>. <scripRef passage="1John 3;3" id="iii.iv-p285.6" parsed="|1John|3|0|0|0;|1John|3|0|0|0" osisRef="Bible:1John.3 Bible:1John.3">
1 John iii. 3</scripRef>. <scripRef passage="Jam 4:8" id="iii.iv-p285.7" parsed="|Jas|4|8|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Jas.4.8">Jam. iv. 8</scripRef>. <scripRef passage="Isa 161" id="iii.iv-p285.8" parsed="|Isa|161|0|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Isa.161">
Isai. i. 61</scripRef>.</p></note></p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.iv-p286">These passages may be reconciled by observing, that the former 
speak expressly of the divine agency in the renovation of the hearts of sinful men, 
and forming them to true holiness. The latter speak of the agency and exercises 
of men, implied in their renovation and holiness, and in which their turning to 
God, and their obedience does consist: And which is necessarily connected with the 
former, and involved in it. Whenever and wherever God gives a new heart, the man 
makes himself a new heart, in that agency and those exercises, in which a new heart 
consists. He renews and cleanses his own heart, and circumcises it, by turning from 
sin to God; hating sin and loving God, and in all that <pb n="171" id="iii.iv-Page_171" />agency, and 
those pure and holy exercises in which he conforms to the divine law, and to the 
gospel, and lives a holy life. All this is necessarily implied in what God does 
in giving a new heart, as it is the effect which he produces by his agency; and 
these are connected, and involved in each other, as are the cause and effect: So 
that to assert one, is equally to assert the existence of the other. The sinner’s 
heart cannot be made a clean heart, by the divine agency, in any other way, but 
by the sinner’s cleansing his own heart; because a clean heart consists in those 
exercises of the man, in which he does cleanse his own heart. It is a contradiction 
to say, that God has circumcised the heart of a man to love him; and yet the man 
does not love him, or, which is the same, has not circumcised his own heart to love 
the Lord: And so of the rest. Therefore when God says, he will give a new heart 
and put a new spirit within men; it is really asserted that they shall renew their 
own hearts, in the proper exercises and agency, in which a new heart and new spirit 
consists; or that they shall walk in his ways. And on the contrary, whenever a man 
makes him a new heart, and becomes obedient, this implies all that divine agency, 
by which God gives a new heart: And therefore by asserting the former to exist, 
the latter is really asserted. If a man purifies himself, and cleanses his own heart, 
in pure, holy exercises, it is certain that God has created in him a clean, a new 
heart; and to assert the former or the latter, is really to assert both.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.iv-p287">Here are two distinct agents, infinitely different; God, absolutely 
independent, and almighty; and a creature absolutely dependent for every thought 
and volition, having no power and sufficiency, that is not derived immediately from 
his Maker: and the agency or operation is as distinct and different as the agents. 
The creature’s agency is as much his own as in the nature of things it can be, and 
as it could be, if it were not the effect of the divine agency, if this were possible. 
And the creature acts as freely, as if there were no agent concerned but himself; 
and his exercises are as virtuous and holy; and it is really and as much his own 
virtue and holiness, and he is as excellent and praise-worthy, <pb n="172" id="iii.iv-Page_172" />as 
if he did not depend on divine influences for these exercises; and they were not 
the effect of the operation of God. All this, it is presumed, is plain, and must 
be evident to all who have attended to what has been said above, on this subject. 
And there can be no difficulty respecting God’s hardening the sinner’s heart, and 
his hardening his own heart, which does not equally attend God’s making a new and 
clean heart, and at the same time the man renewing and cleansing his own heart; 
and no objection can be made against the former, which is not as much against the 
latter: unless it be, that in the latter instance, moral good or holiness in the 
creature is the effect of the divine operation: but in the former, it is directly 
the reverse, and moral evil or sin takes place in consequence of the divine determination 
and agency; which has been thought by many to be inconsistent with the infinite 
purity and holiness of God. It is presumed that what has been said above to this 
point, is sufficient to obviate this objection, and show it to be wholly without 
foundation. But this leads to another observation.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.iv-p288">6. Though it be as expressly asserted in the scriptures which 
have been cited, and particularly considered, that God has determined the existence 
of all the moral evil that takes place, and does by his own operation and agency 
cause it to take place, as it does; as it is, that true virtue and holiness which 
takes place in men, is the effect of divine operation: Yet it does not follow from 
this, that the manner and mode of divine operation, which is the cause of those 
different and opposite effects, is in all respects the same; and consequently no 
man has a right to assert this. Indeed, this, in both instances, is inscrutable 
by man, and cannot be particularly explained. We know that what is produced in the 
latter instance, is, as it consists in the exercises of the creature, conformable 
to the law and nature of God. In the former, what takes place in man, is directly 
the reverse, contrary to God’s nature and law: But as to the manner of operation, 
as the cause of either, we are wholly in the dark; as much as we are, with respect 
to the manner of the divine operation in the creation of the world, and the different 
and various existences. All we <pb n="173" id="iii.iv-Page_173" />know is, that God <i>willed</i> their 
existence, to be just as they do exist, or said, <span class="sc" id="iii.iv-p288.1">Let them be</span>, 
with which <i>fiat</i> their existence is infallibly connected. And he as really 
willed the existence of moral evil as of holiness in creatures; and the existence 
of both is equally the infallible consequence.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.iv-p289">And though the effects, holiness and sin, are in their nature, 
and considered in themselves, so infinitely different and contrary to each other, 
and the latter most odious and abominable; yet the existence of them both may be 
equally important and desirable, and necessary for the glory of God, and the greatest 
possible good: And in this view God willed the existence of both, in the exercise 
of infinite wisdom and benevolence, even the same kind of benevolence which he requires 
of creatures in his holy law; and which is opposed by the sinner in every act of 
sin. It hence appears, that God’s disposition and will respecting the existence 
of sin, which is the origin and cause of it, and his disposition and w ill revealed 
in his law requiring benevolence, and all that is implied in it, and forbidding 
the contrary, are perfectly consistent, and one and the same: And were it possible 
for him to will and choose that sin should not exist, this would have been infinitely 
contrary to the divine law. Thus it appears that God is <span class="sc" id="iii.iv-p289.1">holy</span> 
in all his works and ways, even while he wills the existence of moral evil: And 
that there neither is, nor possibly can be, any moral evil, in being thus the origin 
and cause of it.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.iv-p290">The following questions and answers will conclude this subject.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.iv-p291"><span class="sc" id="iii.iv-p291.1">Question</span>. Does not the doctrine which 
has been advanced, serve to strengthen and confirm the infidel, and others, in their 
belief that man is not a moral agent, and is not capable of sin or blame, whatever 
he may do? Many who reject divine revelation profess to believe the doctrine of 
universal necessity; that all things and events, from the greatest to the least, 
are fixed, so that there can be no alteration: And hence they infer, that man has 
no liberty, and is not a moral agent, so as to be in any degree criminal. And many 
who do not professedly renounce revelation profess to believe the absolute and universal 
dependence of all creatures and things on <pb n="174" id="iii.iv-Page_174" />
God; and hence infer and say, they are what God has made them to be; therefore they 
are not answerable for what they are, or do; nor are they justly blameable for any 
thing in their character or conduct. These will think themselves supported by the 
doctrine of the decrees of God, as it has been stated above. Is it wise or right 
to advance a doctrine which tends to produce such an evil effect? Had it not better 
be suppressed, if it: be true.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.iv-p292"><span class="sc" id="iii.iv-p292.1">Answer</span> 1. If the doctrine, as it has now 
been stated, be clearly and abundantly asserted in the scripture; and the whole 
be necessarily implied in the independence and supremacy of God, and the entire 
dependence of the creature, in all respects, which, it is presumed, has been made 
evident; then there can be no good reason why it should not be asserted and vindicated: 
And it is certain it does not tend to any evil, or to produce any bad effect. And 
if it be improved to any bad purpose, and any groundless inference be made from 
it, it must be an abuse of the truth, and perverting it to an end to which it has 
no tendency; but the contrary.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.iv-p293"><span class="sc" id="iii.iv-p293.1">Ans</span>. 2. There is no religious or moral 
truth revealed in the Bible, which may not be improved to some bad purpose; and 
has not been so improved by ignorant and wicked men. And if no truth ought to be 
explained and vindicated, or mentioned, which may be abused, and will be perverted 
by some, even to their own destruction, all religious truth must be suppressed, 
and the Bible must be shut up, and no more lie open to the world.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.iv-p294"><span class="sc" id="iii.iv-p294.1">Ans</span>. 3. At the same time that the doctrine 
of the divine decrees has been stated and vindicated, it has been equally proved 
from scripture and reason, that man is a free agent, and accountable for his moral 
conduct; and in all respects as much so, and is as real and as much a moral agent, 
as he could be on any supposition, and if this doctrine were not true; and no events 
or actions were fixed and certain before they actually took place: And he is as 
much the former and author of his own moral character, as he could be, were there 
no other agent concerned in them: And all his moral actions are as much his own, 
and his own virtue or sins, as they could be, if nothing were previously done or 
determined, <pb n="175" id="iii.iv-Page_175" />
which rendered them certain. If any will abuse their own reason and the holy scriptures, 
so much as to believe but one of these equally evident truths, and reject the other, 
he must answer for it, and take the consequence. But must one or the other of them 
be given up or suppressed, lest men should abuse one, or both of them? Let the scripture 
and reason judge.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.iv-p295"><span class="sc" id="iii.iv-p295.1">Ans</span>. 4. All the difficulty in this matter 
appears to lie in reconciling the total, universal, and constant dependence of man 
on God, with his freedom and moral agency, and accountableness for his moral conduct. 
The scripture asserts both these in the strongest manner, from the beginning to 
the end, in a variety of ways. The instances are too numerous to be all mentioned 
here. This dependence is represented by the potter and the clay; and man is asserted 
to be as dependant on God for the manner of his existence, and in all his moral 
character and actions, as the clay is on the potter, for the shape, and kind of 
vessel into which it is to be formed.<note n="140" id="iii.iv-p295.2"><p class="normal" id="iii.iv-p296"><scripRef id="iii.iv-p296.1" passage="Rom. ix. 19" parsed="|Rom|9|19|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Rom.9.19">Rom. ix. 19</scripRef>, <scripRef passage="Rom 9:20" id="iii.iv-p296.2" parsed="|Rom|9|20|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Rom.9.20">20</scripRef>, <scripRef passage="Rom 9:21" id="iii.iv-p296.3" parsed="|Rom|9|21|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Rom.9.21">21</scripRef>.</p></note> And wicked 
men, in all their actions, are represented to be as much in the hand of God, and 
moved by him, as the saw, axe, rod or staff, are in the hand or power of a man, 
who uses and moves them.<note n="141" id="iii.iv-p296.4"><p class="normal" id="iii.iv-p297"><scripRef id="iii.iv-p297.1" passage="Isaiah x. 15" parsed="|Isa|10|15|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Isa.10.15">Isaiah x. 15</scripRef>.</p></note> 
The apostle Paul says,<note n="142" id="iii.iv-p297.2"><p class="normal" id="iii.iv-p298"><scripRef id="iii.iv-p298.1" passage="Acts xvii. 28" parsed="|Acts|17|28|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Acts.17.28">Acts xvii. 28</scripRef>.</p></note> “In him we live, and move, and 
have our being.”<note n="143" id="iii.iv-p298.2"><p class="normal" id="iii.iv-p299">Dr. Doddridge gives the following translation of this text. 
“In him we live, (<span lang="EL" class="Greek" id="iii.iv-p299.1">Κινουμεθα</span>) <i>are moved</i>, 
and exist.” And adds the following words. “No words can better express that <i>continual</i> 
and <i>necessary</i> dependence of all derived beings, in their existence, <i>and 
all their operations</i>, on their first and almighty cause; which, the truest philosophy, 
as well as theology teaches.”</p></note></p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.iv-p300">And reason, or true philosophy, teaches the same. A creature cannot 
be made independent, in any the least degree or respect whatever; because this implies 
a contradiction. For if a creature can be independent with respect to any thing, 
or in any degree, he ma} be so in every degree, and in all respects; which is inconsistent 
with his being a creature. Therefore the constant and entire dependence of man, 
on God, his Creator, for existence; for every perception and thought, and every 
motion of body or mind, and every circumstance <pb n="176" id="iii.iv-Page_176" />of these, from the 
least that is possible, to the greatest, is absolute and perfect, in the highest 
degree, and in every respect. According to scripture and right reason, this is perfectly 
consistent with the moral freedom and agency of man; and he is as virtuous or vicious, 
and as worthy of praise, or deserving of blame and punishment, as if he were not 
thus dependent, if this were possible; which it is hoped has been made evident. 
But apostate, proud man <i>feels</i> as if he were, in a great degree at least, 
self dependent, and inclines and aspires to be so. This tends to lead him to wrong 
ideas and speculations on this point, and to prevent his reasoning properly upon 
it. And it is no wonder that great mistakes are made, and that many are led aside 
by false reasoning on the subject; and cannot be convinced of the truth: Or if they 
be in some measure convinced in their judgment, or at least silenced by unanswerable 
arguments; yet they may <i>feel</i> as if it were not, and could not be true; and 
not submit to it, but oppose it in all the exercises of their hearts.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.iv-p301">They who are humble, and feel their dependence on God, and are 
pleased with it, are most likely to understand these things, and to see the consistence 
of such dependence, and their freedom and accountableness to God for their moral 
conduct; and to be satisfied with it. And if they cannot remove every difficulty 
in speculation, and answer all the objections which are made to it; they nevertheless 
do acquiesce, and are pleased with being thus dependent, and yet wholly blameable 
for every deviation from the law of God; and have no doubt of the consistence of 
these, though they may not be able to show how, or to reason the matter out with 
others. “The meek will he guide in judgment; and the meek will he teach his way.”<note n="144" id="iii.iv-p301.1"><p class="normal" id="iii.iv-p302">
<scripRef id="iii.iv-p302.1" passage="Psalm xxv. 9" parsed="|Ps|25|9|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Ps.25.9">Psalm xxv. 9</scripRef>.</p></note> They will approve of the sentiments and exhortation of the 
apostle Paul, and feel and act accordingly. They will “work out their own salvation
<i>with fear and trembling</i>;” that is, in the exercise of true humility, and 
a sense and acknowledgment of their entire, constant dependence on God for every 
exertion and motion of their will; knowing that “He worketh in them both to <i>will</i> 
and to <i>do</i>.”</p>
<pb n="177" id="iii.iv-Page_177" />
<p class="normal" id="iii.iv-p303"><span class="sc" id="iii.iv-p303.1">Ques</span>. Do not the words of the apostle 
James expressly deny that the divine agency is concerned in the existence of moral 
evil, when he says, “Let no man say, when he is tempted, I am tempted of God. For 
God cannot be tempted with evil, neither tempteth he any man?”</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.iv-p304"><span class="sc" id="iii.iv-p304.1">Ans</span>. To tempt, and be tempted, are to 
be understood in different senses, as they are used in the scripture. God is said 
to be tempted, and men are often said to tempt him. And it is said that he tempted 
Abraham: And in this sense he does tempt others, and may tempt all men. Sometimes 
to tempt, is taken in a bad sense, as it is in this passage, and means a sinful 
act, as it always does when Satan is said to tempt any one. In this sense God does 
not tempt any man; for he is holy in all his works. To be tempted, sometimes means 
only <i>to be tried</i>; and is consistent with the perfect innocence and holiness 
of him who is said to be tempted. In this sense God is said to be tempted, and Jesus 
Christ was tempted. Sometimes to be tempted implies moral evil, and actually filling 
into sin. In this sense, the word seems to be used in the following passages, “Considering 
thyself, lest thou also be tempted. Lest by some means the tempter have tempted 
you, and our labour be in vain.”<note n="145" id="iii.iv-p304.2"><p class="normal" id="iii.iv-p305"><scripRef id="iii.iv-p305.1" passage="Gal. vi. 1" parsed="|Gal|6|1|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Gal.6.1">Gal. vi. 1</scripRef>.—<scripRef passage="1Thes 3:5" id="iii.iv-p305.2" parsed="|1Thess|3|5|0|0" osisRef="Bible:1Thess.3.5">1 
Thess. iii. 5</scripRef>.</p></note> 
In this sense the word is to be understood, when James says, “God cannot be 
tempted,” and in the same sense he uses the word, when he speaks of a man being 
tempted. This is evident from his own explanation of it in the following words: “But every man is tempted, when he is drawn away of his own lust, and enticed.” 
A man cannot be tempted, in this sense, but by the exercise and gratification of 
his own lusts; the existence of which is therefore supposed, and necessary, in order 
to his being tempted; without which he could not be so tempted. Therefore a man 
is not, nor can be tempted, in the sense here stated, by any thing that is, or can 
be done, antecedent to the existence of evil, or lust, in his heart. For the temptation 
applies to his lust, and is suited to excite sinful exercises, or lead men into 
sin. It is easy <pb n="178" id="iii.iv-Page_178" />to see, that God does not so tempt any man; and that 
his foreordaining whatsoever comes to pass, and executing his decrees in ordering 
and governing all the actions of men, does not imply this. All that God does is 
infinitely wise and holy. And he does not exhibit any thing to the view of men, 
or set any thing before them, in his word or works, in false colours, or that has 
any tendency to deceive them, or draw them into sin; but every thing which he suggests 
to them, in his word and providence, has a contrary tendency, and is perfect truth. 
And if men view objects in a wrong and false light, it is wholly owing to their 
lusts, by which the light and truth which God sets before them, is perverted and 
abused.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.iv-p306"><span class="sc" id="iii.iv-p306.1">Ques</span>. Have not those who have been called 
Calvinists, and have professed their belief of the doctrine of the decrees of God, 
that he hath foreordained whatsoever comes to pass, denied the divine agency in 
the existence of moral evil, while they hold that God decreed to <i>permit</i> it? 
And is not this way of representing the matter safest and best, to avoid the charge 
of making God the author of sin? And others who hold that God is the cause of every 
act and volition of the sinner, have distinguished, and said that he is the cause 
of them, as <i>natural</i> actions and events, or so far as they are natural; but 
not of the moral depravity of them: That this is wholly from the sinner, and he 
alone is the cause of it? Is not this distinction proper and necessary, in order 
to avoid the above imputation?</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.iv-p307"><span class="sc" id="iii.iv-p307.1">Ans</span>. 1. It has been observed, that Calvin, 
and the assembly of divines, at Westminster, assert that the divine decree and agency, 
respecting the existence of sin, imply more than a <i>bare permission</i>, viz. 
something positive and efficacious.<note n="146" id="iii.iv-p307.2"><p class="normal" id="iii.iv-p308">See page 162, Margin.</p></note> They therefore 
who hold to only a <i>bare permission</i>, do depart from those who have been properly 
called Calvinists; and do not agree with the confession of faith composed by said 
Assembly of divines, or with those numerous churches and divines, who do assent, 
or have assented to that confession of faith, in England, Scotland, Ireland and 
America.</p>
<pb n="179" id="iii.iv-Page_179" />
<p class="normal" id="iii.iv-p309"><span class="sc" id="iii.iv-p309.1">Ans</span>. 2. If by God’s permitting sin, be 
meant, that sin will exist, if God do not interpose and hinder the existence of 
it by a positive exertion; and he only forbears such exertion, and <i>suffers</i> 
it to take ])lace; this involves a real absurdity and impossibility, as it supposes 
sin to exist, without any proper cause, and wholly independent of the first cause. 
And if any one thing, or event, may come into existence, independent of the first 
cause, every existence may do so too , and there is no need of a first cause of 
all, and the being of God cannot be proved, from any existence which men behold. 
But if it did not involve this impossibility, and any should think such an inference 
not just, it does really remove no supposed difficulty with respect to making God 
the origin of sin: for if sin could not exist with out the will and decree of God 
to permit it, and nothing but a bare permission were necessary in order to its existence; 
yet God in determining to permit it, <i>willed</i> the existence of it; and this 
necessarily implies his choice and pleasure, that sin should exist, in every instance 
in which it does take place; and that he orders things so that, he permitting, it 
will certainly exist just as it does. And this implies the whole of the doctrine 
which has been advanced, as has been before observed. To decree to permit sin, in 
the case supposed, is to will the existence of it. And this is liable to all the 
objections which can be made to the doctrine which has been advanced in this chapter, 
as making God the author of sin, &amp;c. And nothing worse, or more, can be said against 
this doctrine, as it has been stated above, which has not been said against the 
assertion, which has been espoused by all Calvinists, viz. That God has foreordained 
whatsoever comes to pass. This has always been loaded, by many, with the greatest 
opprobrium which they could invent, asserting that it is the most blasphemous, horrid 
doctrine, that was ever thought of, making God the sole author of all the sin in 
the world; and most unreasonable and cruel, in punishing men or devils, who, according 
to this doctrine, are perfectly innocent and incapable of sinning, &amp;c. &amp;c. And nothing 
will satisfy such objectors, but to give up the doctrine of the divine decrees, 
and admit man to be and act so as to form his own <pb n="180" id="iii.iv-Page_180" />moral character, 
independent of God, and in every sense contrary to his purpose and will, if it be 
sinful.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.iv-p310"><span class="sc" id="iii.iv-p310.1">Ans</span>. 3. The attempt to distinguish between 
the sinful volitions or actions of man, as natural and moral actions, and making 
God the origin and cause of them, considered as natural actions, and men the cause 
and authors of the depravity and sin which is in them, is, it is believed, unintelligible, 
and has no consistent or real meaning, and gives no rational satisfaction to the 
inquiring mind; unless by making this distinction it be meant, that in every sinful 
action, God is not the sinful cause of it; but all he determines and does respecting 
these, is the exercise of holiness: And all the moral depravity and sin consists 
in the volitions and actions of men, and is their sin, and cannot be ascribed to 
God; men being as much the cause and authors of their own sins, as they could be, 
if God had not done or determined any thing respecting them. And this is the doctrine 
which has been vindicated in this chapter. And is it not reasonable and candid to 
suppose that those worthy men who have made this distinction, did really mean no 
more nor less than this?</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.iv-p311">On the whole, it is presumed there has nothing been advanced, 
as included in the doctrine of the decrees of God, which is not necessarily implied 
in his independence and supremacy, his infinite wisdom and goodness, or holiness; 
and man’s necessary dependence on him; or that is inconsistent with the most perfect 
freedom of man, and his moral agency, and accountableness for all his moral exercises, 
and being justly blameable for every thing in him which is contrary to the holy 
law of God: And that, consistent with this doctrine, as much depends on the will 
and conduct of men, as if they were not dependent, if this were possible, and nothing 
had been done or determined, respecting their volitions and conduct, previous thereto: 
And that their will and conduct is as much <i>their own</i>, and is as deserving 
of praise or blame; is as virtuous or vicious, as it could be, were they wholly 
independent: And that there is nothing contained in this doctrine that makes God 
the author of sin, in any bad sense, and so as to impeach the divine holiness: And 
that all this has been made evident, But <pb n="181" id="iii.iv-Page_181" />if the contrary can be made 
to appear, this doctrine, with all that is implied in it, shall be given up and 
renounced.</p>
<h2 id="iii.iv-p311.1">IMPROVEMENT.</h2>
<p class="normal" id="iii.iv-p312">I. <span class="sc" id="iii.iv-p312.1">From</span> what has been said on this high 
and important subject, may be inferred the truth and divine original of the holy 
scriptures; in that the doctrine of the divine decrees is clearly revealed, and 
so abundantly asserted therein; and the whole Bible is evidently formed on this 
plan. This doctrine is so agreeable to reason, and so essential to rational and 
consistent conceptions of the character and perfections, the infinite felicity, 
and absolute independence and supremacy and dominion of the Most High: and it is 
so desirable and important, that infinite wisdom and goodness should dictate, and 
form the plan of all existences and events; making one harmonious, absolutely perfect 
system; of all possible ones, the wisest and the best; that it might be reasonably 
expected a revelation from heaven would contain this doctrine in all its length 
and breadth, exhibiting it in a clear and incontestible light; and expressly or 
implicitly asserting the perfect consistency of it, with every truth respecting 
the divine character and conduct; and the liberty and moral agency of man.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.iv-p313">If this doctrine were not contained and asserted in divine revelation, 
it would be perfectly unaccountable: And if the holy scriptures were formed on a 
contrary plan, and in opposition to this doctrine, it would be an insuperable objection 
against them, as coming from God. But when the children of wisdom see this contained 
in the Bible, they approve and are satisfied, and discern the divine stamp, in this, 
as well as in other things; and a perfect harmony and consistence through the whole.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.iv-p314">It is true, that many have supposed that if this doctrine were 
in the Bible, it would be an unanswerable objection against the authenticity and 
divine original of it; and have thought they have been supporting the credit of 
divine revelation, by attempting to explain away those passages in which it is most 
expressly asserted, and to <pb n="182" id="iii.iv-Page_182" />put another meaning upon them. But what 
has been gained by these attempts? Has one professed deist been hereby brought to 
think more favourably of the Bible, or to believe this doctrine is not contained 
in it? Not one instance of this, it is presumed, can be produced. And have not impiety 
and infidelity prevailed most, when and where the doctrine of the divine decrees, 
as above asserted and explained, has been most opposed and discarded?</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.iv-p315">All professed deists see the doctrine of the divine decrees, and 
the fixed certainty of all events, plainly asserted in the Bible; and some of them 
dislike this doctrine, and make it an argument, that it is not a revelation from 
God. Others believe and embrace the doctrine, and hence infer, contrary to the scriptures, 
that there is no such thing as liberty, moral agency, virtue or vice: And therefore 
dislike and oppose divine revelation, as much as the other.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.iv-p316">But in the Bible the doctrine of the divine decrees, foreordaining 
whatsoever comes to pass; and the consistency of this with human liberty, moral 
agency, praise and blame, reward and punishment, is asserted; and he who well attends 
to this, will not only acquiesce and approve; but in discerning the beauty and harmony 
of these truths, he will have evidence in his own mind, that this is a revelation 
from God; as the corrupt heart of man, not guided by heavenly illumination, would 
not have represented the matter in this light. Thus what the wisdom of man, the 
wisdom of this world, calls folly, and rejects as such, the children of wisdom embrace 
as wiser than men, even the wisdom of God; and see and adore the finger of God in 
forming such a revelation.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.iv-p317">II. This view of the divine decrees and operations tends to enlarge 
the mind, in high and exalting thoughts of God, and leads to adore him as the first 
and the last, the Almighty, who worketh all things by the counsel of his own will, 
infinite in power and wisdom, doing what he pleases in heaven and on earth: And 
this view of the Deity tends to lead the mind of man to humbling views of himself, 
as absolutely dependent on God, in all respects, and as infinitely little and inconsiderable, 
in comparison with God; and to see the reasonableness and <pb n="183" id="iii.iv-Page_183" />importance 
of being devoted to him, in seeking his glory as the supreme end. In this view, 
the words of St. Paul will be naturally suggested and espoused by the pious mind. 
“O the depth of the riches both of the wisdom and knowledge of God! How unsearchable 
are his ways, and his judgments past finding out! For who hath known the mind of 
the Lord, or who hath been his counsellor? Or who hath first given to him, and it 
shall be recompensed unto him again? For of him, and through him, and to him, are 
all things: To whom be glory forever, Amen.”</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.iv-p318">III. This doctrine is the only foundation, and a sufficient and 
ample one, for the support, comfort and joy of the pious friends of God, in the 
midst of all the darkness, sin and misery that take place. “The Lord reigneth, let 
the people rejoice.” Infinite wisdom and goodness, clothed with omnipotence, reign, 
and nothing takes place but what is important and necessary to accomplish the wisest 
and best end, the glory of God, and the greatest possible good. God will bring infinite 
good out of all the evil; and for this end he hath foreordained whatsoever comes 
to pass. Was not this a most certain truth, and to be relied upon, the pious mind 
must sink in darkness, in the view of the evil that takes place, and could find 
no relief. But here is a source of comfort and joy, since all things are ordered 
in the wisest and best manner, nothing could be added, or taken away, without rendering 
the divine plan less wise, perfect, and excellent.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.iv-p319">It belongs to the infinitely wise, almighty maker and owner of 
all things, and governor of all worlds, to order every event; especially the events 
of the moral world, and the moral actions of creatures, which are the most important: 
They must be determined and fixed by something, by undesigning chance, or by ignorance 
or folly, or by infinite wisdom. He who is infinitely wise and almighty can do it 
in a way perfectly consistent with the liberty and moral agency of his creatures; 
and this being every way most desirable, and the contrary supposition infinitely 
dreadful: when the friends of God see this is done by him, and that his counsel 
with respect to every event, and all actions, stands forever, and <pb n="184" id="iii.iv-Page_184" />
the thoughts of his heart to all generations—they rest in this, and rejoice continually, 
and no man can take this comfort and joy from them. Though the earth be removed, 
or the mountains be carried into the midst of the sea, whatever events, and however 
evil in themselves, take place; yet they will not fear, but drink consolation at 
this river, the streams whereof make glad the city of God. “Let the righteous be 
glad; let them rejoice before God; yea, let them exceedingly rejoice.”<note n="147" id="iii.iv-p319.1"><p class="normal" id="iii.iv-p320"><scripRef id="iii.iv-p320.1" passage="Psalm lxviii. 3" parsed="|Ps|68|3|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Ps.68.3">Psalm 
lxviii. 3</scripRef>.</p></note></p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.iv-p321">IV. This affords a solid stable foundation, for the most unreserved, 
implicit confidence and trust in God. He superintends in all things. He is in the 
heavens, and hath done whatsoever he pleased; he will accomplish his own ends, and 
cannot be disappointed. Therefore his friends may trust in him with the greatest 
assurance, that, whatever appearances there may be against it, he will accomplish 
his own ends, glorify himself, fulfil all his promises to his people, and make them 
most happy forever. “O Lord of hosts, blessed is the man that trusteth in thee.” 
Therefore,</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.iv-p322">V. This doctrine is suited to promote true piety and holiness. 
For this consists in loving God, in trusting and rejoicing in him, and his government 
and works, acknowledging him in all our ways, in seeing his hand in all events, 
in submitting to him, and obeying him. This doctrine is so far from affording any 
just ground of encouragement to sin, that so far as it is understood and cordially 
embraced, it forms the heart to hate sin and love the law of God, and to the most 
hearty, cheerful submission to his government. Experience proves this to be true, 
and the reason of it is very obvious. For they who see and approve of the wisdom 
of God in making all things for himself, and ordering all things, even the sins 
of men, for his own glory; must themselves desire and seek the glory of God; and 
this necessarily implies an approbation of the law of God, and a cordial submission 
and obedience to it.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.iv-p323">VI. Hence may be inferred the propriety and importance of preaching 
this doctrine, and of explaining and vindicating it, as it is revealed in the holy 
scriptures.</p>
<pb n="185" id="iii.iv-Page_185" />
<p class="normal" id="iii.iv-p324">Some who believe it is revealed in the Bible, yet think it ought 
not to be preached, or spoken of, as it is such a mysterious doctrine, and is so 
difficult and puzzling to many, and a stumbling block to them, rather than to their 
edification; and is liable to be misimproved to bad purposes.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.iv-p325">But such must be under a great mistake. It is dishonourable to 
God, and to the Bible, to suppose any truth which he has there revealed, is of a 
bad tendency, and therefore ought not to be published; yea, it is implicitly denying 
that the Bible is from God, and taking sides with the deist. Besides, there is a 
contradiction and absurdity in the supposition, that it is a truth, and yet has 
a bad tendency; for this is impossible in the nature of things. That which has a 
bad tendency, is error and falsehood; but <i>truth</i> has a direct contrary tendency 
and effect, wherever it is received.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.iv-p326">It is true, this doctrine may be preached imprudently, it may 
be represented in a partial and improper light; and so that the hearers will not 
understand it. No one can be justified for preaching this, or any other truth, in 
such a manner. But this is rather a reason why it should, with all other important 
truths, be thoroughly and fully preached, so that they who are disposed to attend, 
and willing to understand, may have opportunity to be instructed. It is doubtless 
better, if there can be a <i>better</i> in the case, not to preach it at all, than 
to do it to the halves, just mentioning it sometimes; for this is not the way to 
have it understood, but tends to raise prejudices against it. But the best and only 
wise way is, to preach it, and explain it clearly and fully, and give persons opportunity, 
more privately, to propose any objections they may have, that they may be removed.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.iv-p327">And parents ought to be able and willing to teach it to their 
children; to explain it and show them the reason of it, and the evidence there is 
in the scripture of the truth of it. And though they might not fully understand 
it in early age; yet a foundation would be hereby laid for their making improvement 
in understanding, as they advance in years. It is not so difficult a doctrine, as 
many imagine, who perhaps never understood it themselves, through strong prejudices, 
which they imbibed, <pb n="186" id="iii.iv-Page_186" />before they were well instructed in it. A child 
of twelve or fourteen years old, who is carefully instructed, and will attend, is 
capable of understanding and seeing the evidence and reasonableness of this doctrine; 
which must be believed as an important article of the christian faith, where the 
Bible is well understood; however it be now, and has been, rejected by many, with 
the greatest contempt, boldness and assurance.</p>

</div2>

<div2 title="Chapter V. Concerning the Creation of the World, Particularly of Man." prev="iii.iv" next="iii.vi" id="iii.v">
<h2 id="iii.v-p0.1">CHAP. V.</h2>
<h3 id="iii.v-p0.2">CONCERNING THE CREATION OF THE WORLD, PARTICULARLY OF MAN.</h3>
<p class="normal" id="iii.v-p1">GOD began to execute his infinitely wise and good plan, which 
he had formed and fixed, by his unchangeable purpose and decree, in the work of 
creation. “In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth.” Heaven and earth 
comprehend the whole creation, both that which is visible, and invisible, to man.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.v-p2">This is said to be <i>in the beginning</i>, to denote that creation, 
or every thing that is created, had a beginning, in opposition to being eternal, 
or without a beginning; and because time and succession of existence then began; 
there being no other beginning of existence but this, and therefore no <i>beginning</i> 
before this, there being nothing before creation, but the Creator, whose existence 
is <i>without beginning</i>.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.v-p3">The creation is great, extensive and manifold, and vastly exceeds 
our knowledge and comprehension: But God spake the whole into existence, from nothing, 
with infinite ease. He said, “Let it be, and it was. He spake, and it was done: 
He commanded, and it stood fast.” The invisible heaven, which probably is intended 
when St. Paul speaks of the <i>Third Heaven</i>, and is called by Solomon, “The 
heaven of heavens,” was in this beginning created, and formed for the peculiar residence 
of God, who is said to have established his throne in the heavens, to be and dwell 
there; and the place where angels dwell; their creation being comprehended in the 
creation of heaven. And this is the heaven to <pb n="187" id="iii.v-Page_187" />which the redeemed will 
be received after the day of judgment, which our Saviour says, was “prepared for 
them from the foundation of the world.” This heaven and the angels were created 
then; but before this lower world was formed, and brought into order. Therefore 
it is represented by God, that when he created this earth, the angels were spectators 
of the work; for these are <i>the morning stars</i>, and <i>the sons of God</i>, 
who are said to <i>sing together and shout for joy</i>, when the earth was formed.<note n="148" id="iii.v-p3.1"><p class="normal" id="iii.v-p4">
<scripRef id="iii.v-p4.1" passage="Job xxxviii. 4" parsed="|Job|38|4|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Job.38.4">Job xxxviii. 4</scripRef>, <scripRef passage="Job 38:7" id="iii.v-p4.2" parsed="|Job|38|7|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Job.38.7">7</scripRef>.</p></note> God was pleased to create innumerable hosts of intelligent 
beings, with strong powers of mind, and large capacities, to be spectators of his 
works, and attend to the numerous worlds and creatures, as they rose into existence 
and order; and behold and admire infinite power, wisdom and goodness, manifested 
herein, and rejoice, adore and praise the Creator.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.v-p5">We have no knowledge of the existence of any other rational creatures 
besides angels and men: and therefore we have no reason to conclude there are any 
other. Men may <i>suppose</i> there are many other ranks or kinds of rational creatures; 
but this, at most, is but mere conjecture. The supposition that there are no more, 
seems to have a more solid foundation, viz. that divine revelation makes no mention 
of any such; which it is reasonable to suppose it would, if there were any; since 
all rational creatures, under the same moral government, must have some connection 
and concern with each other.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.v-p6">The angels are often brought into view in the holy scriptures; 
and they are represented as having a particular concern and interest in the future 
general judgment: Were there any other moral agents, they would have ah equal concern 
in this judgment, and be members of the same society and kingdom of God, with the 
holy angels, and the redeemed from among men, or share in the punishment of the 
wicked: therefore, it is reasonable to suppose their existence, and some circumstances 
relating to them, would have been revealed, had there been any such creatures. The 
silence of the scriptures on this head is a sufficient reason to conclude, that 
angels and men are the only moral agents in the <pb n="188" id="iii.v-Page_188" />created universe; 
or, at least, not to conclude there are any such, and to be silent about them.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.v-p7">If it should be said, that the supposition of innumerable ranks 
of rational creatures, beside angels and men, represents God’s moral kingdom vastly 
more grand and glorious, than if there were none but the latter: It may be observed, 
that we are not competent judges of the number which will best answer the ends of 
infinite wisdom. There must be some bounds set to the number of rational creatures; 
and how many soever are included in this number, there would be equal reason to 
suppose it would be better, and render the kingdom of God still more grand a: id 
glorious, to have innumerable myriads added to the number, as there is to suppose 
it would be better there should be more than angels and men. Therefore there is 
certainly <i>no reason</i> for such a supposition.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.v-p8">There are “an innumerable company of angels,” even when 
numbers, beyond our reckoning or conception, are left in sin and ruin. And who can 
have any adequate conception of the number of the human race, including all who 
have existed, and all who shall yet exist, before the end of the world! No man has 
any reason to think or suppose, that this number of intelligent moral agents, far 
beyond his conception, is not exactly sufficient, in the view of him whose understanding 
and wisdom are infinite, to answer all the ends of his moral government, and to 
render his eternal kingdom most complete, happy and glorious.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.v-p9">The number and magnitude of the various bodies, worlds and systems 
in the material universe, which we behold, or can imagine, do not render it certain, 
or in the least degree probable, that they are all, or any of them, inhabited by 
rational creatures. If we were certain that the fixed stars are all like the sun 
in our system, which give light and heat to as many vast bodies or worlds, as our 
sun does, and no more: and that there are innumerable stars or suns, of this kind, 
invisible to us; yet all these, and as many more as the most enlarged mind can imagine, 
may be no more, nor greater, than is proper and necessary to answer the ends, which 
infinite wisdom has in view, with respect to angels and <pb n="189" id="iii.v-Page_189" />men. It is 
certain no man can determine they are not all necessary to answer the best ends, 
though there be no other ranks of rational creatures.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.v-p10">God was able, and could as easily create the whole world, and 
all creatures and things therein, and put them in the best form, and most perfect 
order at once, in the first moment of their existence, as to do it gradually, and 
by a progressive work; but the writings of Moses inform us, that he was pleased 
to be six days in creating the world, and finishing this stupendous work: And we 
are particularly told, in what manner and order this work was carried on, until 
the whole was finished. We may be sure there were wise and important ends to be 
answered, by creating in this manner, and taking up the time of six days, and no 
more, in this work, though we were not able to discover or imagine what they are. 
But we are not left wholly in the dark, with respect to this. It is evident from 
scripture, that the natural world is so adapted to the moral, that the former is 
a representation or emblem of the latter; and that there is a designed analogy of 
the natural to the moral. This appears in that, in innumerable instances, reference 
is had to things in the natural world, and use is made of them, to represent and 
illustrate those of a moral kind, in the holy scriptures.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.v-p11">The darkness and chaotic state in which the materials of which 
the world was to be made, lay and were found: it being <i>tohu bohu</i>, without 
form and void, or emptiness, confusion and vanity, is a striking emblem of the moral 
state in which man is found, as the subject of redemption, from which a most perfect, 
beautiful and glorious kingdom is to be formed; which is therefore called a <i>new 
creation, the new heavens and the new earth</i>. Mankind are, in consequence of 
the first apostasy, m a state of moral confusion, disorder and darkness; of total 
ruin, emptiness and vanity. Redemption or the new creation, the kingdom of Christ, 
is formed out of these materials; and, when brought to perfection, will be a most 
bright and glorious monument of infinite power, wisdom, and goodness: and will so 
vastly exceed the first creation in importance, duration, worth, beauty and glory, 
that the former work will be forgotten, and <pb n="190" id="iii.v-Page_190" />not be worthy of mention, 
in comparison with the latter. This is the representation given of ii in the scriptures, 
particularly by the prophet Isaiah.<note n="149" id="iii.v-p11.1"><p class="normal" id="iii.v-p12"><scripRef passage="Isa 65:17,18" id="iii.v-p12.1" parsed="|Isa|65|17|65|18" osisRef="Bible:Isa.65.17-Isa.65.18">Chap. 
lxv. 17, 18</scripRef>.</p></note> 
“Behold, I create <i>new heavens, and a new earth</i>: And the former shall not 
be remembered, nor come into the mind. But be you glad, and rejoice forever in that 
which I create; for behold, I create Jerusalem a rejoicing, and her people a joy.” 
This is farther explained by the apostles, Peter and John.<note n="150" id="iii.v-p12.2"><p class="normal" id="iii.v-p13">2 Pet. iii. 13.—<scripRef passage="Rev 21:1" id="iii.v-p13.1" parsed="|Rev|21|1|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Rev.21.1">Rev. 
xxi. 1</scripRef>.</p></note> Peter, speaking of the dissolution of the old or first 
heavens and earth, says, “Nevertheless we, according to his promise, look for <i>
new heavens and a new earth, wherein dwelleth righteousness</i>.” By the last words 
he fixes his meaning of <i>new heavens and a new earth</i>. It is that society or 
moral kingdom, wherein dwelleth righteousness: That is, the holy church and kingdom 
of Christ, consisting in moral excellency, righteousness, or holiness. John says, 
“I saw a new heaven, and a new earth: For the first heaven, and the first earth 
were passed away.” He then proceeds to describe the new heaven, and the new earth: 
“And I, John, saw the <i>holy city</i>, new Jerusalem, coming down from God out 
of heaven, prepared as a bride adorned for her husband.” This is the new heaven 
and the new earth, even the <i>new Jerusalem</i>, the <i>holy city</i>, wherein 
dwelleth righteousness, that is, the church and kingdom of Christ, formed out of 
the moral chaos of disorder, confusion and darkness, in which he found mankind; 
and adorned with righteousness or true holiness. None who attend can be insensible, 
that this passage is parallel with that in Isaiah, quoted above; and explains the 
meaning of the new heavens, and new earth, and of Jerusalem, mentioned there. In 
both places, Jerusalem and the new heavens and new earth are evidently put for the 
same thing; and the <i>new Jerusalem</i> is certainly the church of Christ, or the 
work of redemption, with all the appendages of it.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.v-p14">The gradual increase and advance of light and order, in creating 
and forming the natural material world, is analogous to the increase of light and 
order in the moral world, particularly in the work of redemption, and an emblem 
of it. This light began to dawn directly after 
<pb n="191" id="iii.v-Page_191" />the fall of man, and has been increasing ever since; and will continue 
to increase, till the <i>Sun of righteousness</i>, (the sun of the moral world, 
the Lord and Saviour, who is the light of the world, and of whom the natural sun 
is an emblem) shall arise, upon all nations, with healing in his beams; and the 
earth shall be full of the knowledge of the Lord, as the waters cover the sea; when 
the church shall arise, and put on her morally beautiful garments, and shine in 
the beauty of holiness. And the darkness in the natural world, preceding light, 
and night preceding day, is a representation of what takes place in the church, 
and will in some degree continue, till the consummation of all things. Darkness, 
affliction and trouble, the fruit of the original universal moral disorder, do take 
place in a sort of periodical succession, which is followed with a greater or less 
degree of light, peace and comfort; until all evil shall be banished from the church 
forever, and there shall be no more night there.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.v-p15">As God was six days in forming the natural world, in bringing 
it into the order which he designed, and furnishing it with the various sorts of 
inhabitants; and then rested on the seventh day: this was a designed emblem of the 
moral world, or of redemption, pointing out the length of time that it would take 
to bring that to such a state of order and beauty as was intended, a day being put 
for the period of a thousand years. During the space of six thousand years Christ 
is carrying on the work of redemption, and forming his church and kingdom, out of 
the chaotic mass of mankind, to a state of order and beauty, through various revolutions 
and conflicts; when it shall be brought to a state of rest and peace; and the seventh 
thousand years of the world shall be a day of rest, when “the kingdom and dominion, 
and the greatness of the kingdom under the whole heaven shall be given to the people 
of the saints of the Most High;” and the church shall put on her beautiful garments, 
prepared as a bride is adorned for her husband: And the Lord her God will rejoice 
over her with joy: He will <i>rest</i> in his love, and will joy over her with singing.</p>
<pb n="192" id="iii.v-Page_192" />
<p class="normal" id="iii.v-p16">Moreover, by working six days, and resting from his work on the 
seventh, and consequently sanctifying that, and setting it apart as a day of rest 
for man, he set an example, and made an institution for man, which was useful, important 
and necessary, for the best good of man, and the promotion of his designs respecting 
his moral kingdom.<note n="151" id="iii.v-p16.1"><p class="normal" id="iii.v-p17">No evidence can be produced that this <i>seventh day</i> 
from the beginning of creation, is not that which is now the first day of the week; 
and the contrary perhaps may be supported by satisfactory evidence; And some astronomers 
assert that this can be demonstrated by astronomical calculations: But this will 
be more particularly considered in the sequel.</p></note></p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.v-p18">According to the scriptures, there have not yet been six thousand 
years since the creation. And there are a variety of facts and arguments which prove 
the world cannot be much older than it is represented to be in sacred history: which 
have been mentioned by many writers: And there are no appearances or facts, which 
give the least evidence of the contrary.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.v-p19">It has been asked, Why the world was not created sooner? Why it 
would not have been wiser an d better, to have had it created so much sooner, or 
be fore it was created, as to have every thing ready for the day of judgment by 
this time; yea, so as to have had all the blessed in the enjoyment of complete happiness 
for millions of ages already? For this would have been so much clear gain of happiness, 
which is really lost, and never can be enjoyed, because the world was created so 
late.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.v-p20">It may be observed upon this, <i>in the first place</i>, that 
this question can never be satisfied, so that it might not still be asked with as 
much reason and propriety, as it is now asked; and therefore it must be an improper 
and unreasonable question. If the world had <i>now</i> existed ten thousand ages 
instead of six thousand years; and were this possible, still the question might 
be asked, with as much apparent reason as now. Why it had not been created so early, 
as now to have existed ten millions of ages instead of ten thousand? And so on without 
end. That question or demand, which in the nature of things cannot be answered or 
satisfied, on any supposition whatsoever, is unreasonable, and ought never to be 
made.</p>
<pb n="193" id="iii.v-Page_193" />
<p class="normal" id="iii.v-p21">In the <i>second place</i>, This question is inconsistent and 
absurd, and can really have no meaning. Antecedent to the beginning of time there 
could be no succession from one minute or hour to another; for minutes and hours 
relate only to <i>time</i>. There was no <i>before</i> or <i>after</i>, <i>sooner</i> 
or <i>later</i>. Antecedent to the creation of the world, there was no existence 
but the Creator, who only exists without beginning to exist, and therefore without 
succession. There is no such thing, or idea, to answer the words, <i>before</i> 
or <i>after, sooner</i> or <i>later</i>, with respect to him and his existence. 
These are relative terms, and denote ideas that relate to time; and therefore cannot 
be used with propriety, to denote any thing antecedent to creation; because no such 
thing can be predicated of absolute eternity, which has no relation to time, and 
succession. Therefore it may be with truth asserted, <i>that the world could not 
be created </i><span class="sc" id="iii.v-p21.1">sooner </span><i>than it was, or </i>
<span class="sc" id="iii.v-p21.2">before </span><i>it was actually created</i>. Because there was 
no succession, and therefore nothing sooner or later, before or after, antecedent 
to creation.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.v-p22">And when it is asked. Why the world was not created so early, 
that from the creation to the present time, as many millions of years should have 
passed, as there have thousands? There is an impropriety in the question, in the 
use of the word <i>early</i>, because there was no such thing as <i>early</i> or
<i>late</i>, antecedent to the creation, and therefore this is altogether inapplicable 
to eternity, and is a word, when used in this case, without any idea or meaning, 
or if any idea be affixed to it, or conveyed by it, it is a false and delusive one, 
or not agreeable to the truth, as has been just before proved. But, if the word
<i>early</i> were allowed to be proper, it may upon this be observed, that the world 
could not be created so <i>soon</i>, or so <i>early</i>, but that there must be 
a time, when there have been just so many years from the creation, to that time, 
as there have actually been since the world was created, to this time. And whenever 
that time had come, and the world had been created but six thousand years, the question 
might be asked. Why the world was not created <i>before</i>, so that millions of 
years should have passed by that time, instead of six thousand? And on that supposition, 
this question would be as proper and <pb n="194" id="iii.v-Page_194" />
reasonable, as it is now. And therefore it may be always asked, and never can be 
satisfied: Consequently is an unreasonable, absurd question, as has been shown.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.v-p23">Besides, the querist may be asked, since, though the world were 
created ever so early, even as soon as it was possible it could be created; yet 
there must be a time when it had existed just so many years, as it has now actually 
existed; how does he know, that he does not live in that very time, and that the 
world was created as early as his question demands; yea, as soon as it could be 
created, and have a beginning?</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.v-p24">He who attends to this will doubtless perceive how unreasonable 
and absurd it is to suppose that the creation might have been sooner or later, or 
that there might <i>now</i> have been more or a less number of years since the creation, 
than there have been by creating the world sooner or later than it was actually 
created: And therefore, that there is no propriety or sense in the question, which 
has been considered. And perhaps it may be thought needless to introduce it here, 
and say so much, or even any thing by way of answer.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.v-p25">It has been a question, when, or at what time of the year, the 
world was created, and time began? The general opinion has been that the world was 
made and time began at or about the autumnal equinox. It is reasonable to suppose 
that the fruits of the earth, necessary for the support and convenience of man, 
were all ready for his use, when he was created, and therefore that the trees, &amp;c. 
were created with their fruit in maturity, which they have since constantly produced, 
at that time of the year; which in the climate in which Adam was created, is in 
the latter end of our September, or beginning of October. And there is this greater 
evidence that time began at that time of the year, viz. that all nations began their 
years at that time: and Abraham and his descendants did so, until they left the 
land of Egypt; when God ordered them to begin their religious year at the vernal 
equinox, which takes place in our March. Yet even then, and after that, they continued 
to begin their civil year at the autumnal equinox, as other nations did. This is 
evident from the beginning of the seventh month, reckoning from the beginning of 
their ecclesiastical <pb n="195" id="iii.v-Page_195" />year, being said to be <i>in the end of the year</i>: 
That is, when the year past had ended, and another year was begun.<note n="152" id="iii.v-p25.1"><p class="normal" id="iii.v-p26"><scripRef id="iii.v-p26.1" passage="Exodus xxiii. 15" parsed="|Exod|23|15|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Exod.23.15">Exodus 
xxiii. 15</scripRef>, <scripRef passage="Exodus 23:16" id="iii.v-p26.2" parsed="|Exod|23|16|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Exod.23.16">16</scripRef>.</p></note> “Thou shalt keep the feast of ingatheung, <i>which is in the 
end of the year</i>, when thou hast gathered in thy labours out of the field.”</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.v-p27">When God had created the world, and furnished the earth in a manner 
suited for the habitation of man, he created Adam, and then formed Eve out of one 
of his ribs, last of all in the end of the sixth day. The particular manner of making 
Eve, expressed the near and intimate union which was to take place between the sexes, 
and their mutual relation and dependence, together with the superiority of the man 
to the woman. These two were so formed, that the whole human race was contained 
and formed in them, and to be propagated from them; so that in creating these two 
parents of mankind, and commanding them to multiply and fill the earth, all mankind 
were created. And as, in creating them he made the whole human race, and they comprehended 
the whole; so there was a propriety, in treating them as if they were the whole, 
in his transactions with them, and what he said to them; in this, having respect 
to all their posterity, and comprehending them as much as if they had then actually 
existed. As in forming the trees and plants, with the seeds in them, according to 
their kind, by which they were to propagate the same kind to the end of the world, 
he created and really gave existence and form to all the trees and plants that grow 
out of the earth; they being all comprehended in the original stock; and existing 
after their several kinds, by the same command which formed the first of the kind, 
and under the same regulations and laws of nature: So in creating the original stock, 
the first parents of mankind, with power, and under a command to propagate their 
kind, God created all their posterity; and by forming them, formed the whole, after 
their kind. And what he did for, and with them, he did for all, and they, with all 
their race, were put under the same regulations and laws; and what he said to these 
parents of mankind, he said to them and their posterity,</p>
<pb n="196" id="iii.v-Page_196" />
<p class="normal" id="iii.v-p28">Man was made superior to all other creatures on the earth, being 
created with a rational soul, capable of understanding things of a moral nature, 
and acting voluntarily, from moral motives: by which he was placed in the <i>moral 
world</i>, being made capable of moral government; of being under a moral law, and 
of obedience, or disobedience to it; and of reward or punishment, according to his 
moral exercises and conduct. And he was made in the <i>moral image</i> of God, with 
a good discerning, taste or disposition, or rectitude of mind and will, or heart; 
by which he was perfectly conformed to the rule of his duty, or the moral law; which 
is the same with conformity to the moral character of God. This is to be made in
<i>the image of God</i>, and <i>after his likeness</i>, in the highest and most 
proper sense, and to exist in the most excellent manner, and must be implied in 
the expression, “Let us make man in our image, and after our likeness.” And in the 
assertion, “So God created man in his own image, in the image of God created he 
him:“ Though that which is less perfect and excellent may be implied in this, viz. 
his natural faculties and endowments of understanding and will, and his being made 
lord of this earth, having dominion over all inferior creatures on earth, and in 
the sea. The moral image of God must be implied and particularly intended, as it 
is asserted without any limitation or restriction to the natural image of God, and 
to be in his moral image, is unspeakably the greatest, most important and excellent: 
And without which, his natural abilities, and dominion over all other creatures, 
would be worse than nothing. But were there any doubt about the meaning, St. Paul 
puts it beyond dispute in giving the true and important sense of the image of God.<note n="153" id="iii.v-p28.1"><p class="normal" id="iii.v-p29">
<scripRef id="iii.v-p29.1" passage="Eph. iv. 23" parsed="|Eph|4|23|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Eph.4.23">Eph. iv. 23</scripRef>, <scripRef passage="Eph 4:24" id="iii.v-p29.2" parsed="|Eph|4|24|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Eph.4.24">24</scripRef>.</p></note> “And be renewed in the spirit of your mind; and that ye 
put on the new man, which after God (that is, after his image or likeness) is created 
in righteousness and true holiness.”<note n="154" id="iii.v-p29.3"><p class="normal" id="iii.v-p30"><scripRef id="iii.v-p30.1" passage="Col. iii. 10" parsed="|Col|3|10|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Col.3.10">Col. iii. 10</scripRef>.</p></note> “And have 
put on the new man, which is renewed in knowledge, after the image of him that created 
him.” This is parallel with the passage cited from the epistle to the Ephesians, 
and therefore by <i>knowledge</i> here, is meant that true discerning which implies 
holiness, and which <pb n="197" id="iii.v-Page_197" />Christ says is eternal life, even to <i>know</i> 
the only true God, and Jesus Christ. Therefore, according to St. Paul, to be created 
after the image or likeness of God, is to be made truly holy, or to put on his moral 
image. To the same purpose he says,<note n="155" id="iii.v-p30.2"><p class="normal" id="iii.v-p31"><scripRef id="iii.v-p31.1" passage="2 Cor. iii. 18" parsed="|2Cor|3|18|0|0" osisRef="Bible:2Cor.3.18">2 Cor. iii. 18</scripRef>.</p></note> “But we all with 
open face, beholding as in a glass the glory of the Lord, are changed into the same 
image.” The glory of the Lord, is his holiness: therefore to be changed into the 
same image, is to be made like God in holiness.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.v-p32">Man was not only put at the head of this world, this earth, in 
which he was made, and all creatures and things in it; which were all made for him: 
but the whole creation was made with reference to him, and in a sense for him; so 
that he is the end of all, under God, and next to him. It has been observed, that 
the material or natural creation, however large we may suppose it to be; and even 
though it may exceed our imagination, was made with reference to the moral world, 
and for the sake of that; and that angels and men are most probably the only moral 
agents which were created; and that God’s moral eternal kingdom will consist of 
these only. For the sake of these then the worlds were made; they are the end of 
all God’s works, next to himself, who is the ultimate end of all; for God hath made 
all things for himself. He made the material, natural world for angels and men, 
to promote his designs concerning them; and he made them, who are the end of all 
his other works, for himself.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.v-p33">And though man in his natural powers and capacities, and in his 
situation and circumstances, was first made <i>lower</i> than the angels, and in 
many respects inferior to them; yet, we learn from the scriptures, that he is more 
an ultimate end in the creation, than the angels; or that the angels were made
<i>for man</i>, and not man for the angels. We may know the particular end for which 
God makes any creature or thing by the use to which he puts it, or the end which 
he makes it to answer. And the scripture teaches us that the angels are improved 
to answer God’s ends respecting man, and that he uses them all in the service of 
man.<note n="156" id="iii.v-p33.1"><p class="normal" id="iii.v-p34"><scripRef id="iii.v-p34.1" passage="Heb. i. 14" parsed="|Heb|1|14|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Heb.1.14">Heb. i. 14</scripRef>.</p></note> “Are they (the angels) not all ministering spirits, 
sent forth to 
<pb n="198" id="iii.v-Page_198" />minister to them who shall be heirs of salvation?” It appears from 
divine revelation, that God designed to answer his ultimate end of the creation 
chiefly, and in the most eminent degree by man; and therefore all other creatures 
and things are subordinated to him, and made to answer the divine purposes with 
respect to him, even the angels, the highest and most noble order of beings that 
were created. The human race were the peculiar favourites of Heaven. The most important 
and glorious ends were designed to be answered by them. The redeemed from among 
men, the church, is the bride, the Lamb’s wife, is to be raised in dignity and glory, 
far above the angels: to sit with Christ in heaven, and reign with him in a peculiar 
union to him, as the members of which he is the head: while the angels are represented 
as standing round about the redeemed, waiting upon them and ministering unto them. 
The Son of God took not on him the nature of angels, but of man, and has hereby 
laid a foundation to raise the redeemed, who were originally made below the angels, 
and by sin had sunk infinitely low in unworthiness, guilt and wretchedness, far 
above the angels in honour, glory and happiness: And hereby is made the brightest 
and most glorious eternal display of infinite power, wisdom, goodness, justice, 
mercy, grace, truth and faithfulness; in which God is glorified to the highest degree, 
that is conceivable or even possible. Into these things therefore the angels desire 
to look. They are all attention to man, and the wonderful glorious scene that is 
opened respecting him; and by the church of Christ, and the wonders of redemption, 
are made known unto them the manifold wisdom of God. Therefore the angels, with 
all other things visible and invisible, were made <i>for</i> Christ, considered 
in the capacity and character of the Redeemer and Saviour of the church.<note n="157" id="iii.v-p34.2"><p class="normal" id="iii.v-p35"><scripRef id="iii.v-p35.1" passage="Col. i. 16" parsed="|Col|1|16|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Col.1.16">Col. 
i. 16</scripRef>.</p></note> “For by him were all things created that are in heaven, and 
that are in the earth, visible and invisible, whether they be thrones or dominions, 
principalities or powers: All things were created by him, and <i>for him</i>.” Therefore 
when he came into the world to redeem his church by his obedience and death, all 
the angels of God received 
<pb n="199" id="iii.v-Page_199" />command to worship him; that is, to submit and devote themselves to 
him, to wait upon and serve him in the work and business which lie came into the 
world to perform, in favour of mankind. Accordingly, a multitude of those heavenly 
hosts attended upon him, when he first appeared in the world, and worshipped him; 
and were with gladness and joy his messengers to carry the good tidings of his incarnation 
to men. And they waited upon him, and ministered to him, while he was tempted of 
the devil, and laboured and suffered in this world; and when he rose from the grave, 
they were present to serve him, and to tell the good news to his friends. And when 
he ascended into heaven, all the angels accompanied him with veneration and joy; 
rejoicing in his exaltation and glory, when he sat down on the right hand of God; 
and they were all made subject unto him, voluntarily giving themselves to him, to 
be the willing instruments in promoting his cause and work in the salvation of sinners; 
rejoicing in the conversion of the elect, and cheerfully serving and ministering 
to the heirs of salvation. Therefore because the angels were made for man, and are 
the devoted servants of Christ in his work of redemption, and of the redeemed, constantly 
waiting upon them, and ministering to them, Christ speaking of the redeemed, calls 
the angels, <i>their</i> angels.</p>
<h2 id="iii.v-p35.2">IMPROVEMENT.</h2>
<p class="normal" id="iii.v-p36">I. The view we have now taken of the creation of the world, though 
a very partial imperfect one, is sufficient to impress our minds with a belief and 
assurance of the being of God, and of his power, greatness, wisdom and goodness; 
the marks and evidences of which are every where to be seen, in the things which 
are made. The existence of the world, and of all things round us which we behold, 
and our own existence, and the manner of it, are a demonstration, constantly held 
before our eyes, of the existence of an invisible Being, who has power and wisdom 
enough to contrive and produce all these things in their order and harmony; and 
so as to supply the wants, and promote the happiness of <pb n="200" id="iii.v-Page_200" />the sensible 
part of the creation: And that this Being exists independent, necessarily, and therefore 
without beginning, absolutely and infinitely perfect, happy and glorious. And the 
more we attend to the creation, and examine the great works, the sun, moon and stars, 
or this globe on which we live, and the various ranks of creatures which come under 
our notice, the more clear and striking will be the evidence of <i>design</i>, and 
of the power, wisdom and goodness of the Creator. And we ought hereby to be led 
sensibly to say with the Psalmist, “O Lord, how manifold are thy works! in wisdom 
hast thou made them all; the earth is full of thy riches.” And may well join with 
the four and twenty Elders, “saying, thou art worthy, O Lord, to receive glory, 
and honour, and power; for thou hast created all things, and for thy pleasure they 
are, and were created.”</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.v-p37">II. From what has been observed concerning the creation of man, 
his endowments and circumstances, we are led particularly to reflect upon the goodness 
of God to him, in making a world for him, every way furnished for his convenience 
and happiness; in forming him for the moral world, by giving him understanding and 
moral liberty, in acting voluntarily in the view of moral motives; thus making him 
a moral agent, capable of virtue or vice, of reward or punishment; and therefore 
immortal, giving him an existence never to end. He made him lord of the world in 
which he was placed, giving him dominion over all the creatures in the earth and 
sea. He formed him in his own image, after his likeness, a perfectly holy creature, 
which is the highest excellence in the universe, by which he was united to his Creator 
in perfect love and friendship, enjoying a sweet and happy intercourse and intimacy 
with him.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.v-p38">In this happy state all mankind were created and placed; for, 
as has been observed, all the posterity of Adam were included in him, and what was 
done for him was done for all. And we ought to consider ourselves as originally 
placed in the happy state in which Adam was created. And if Adam was under obligation 
to exercise peculiar gratitude to his Maker for his wonderful goodness to him, we 
are to consider ourselves under the same obligation to gratitude for creating goodness, 
and <pb n="201" id="iii.v-Page_201" />view all the kindness conferred on our first parents in their 
creation, as conferred on all their posterity. And if the apostasy of Adam, by which 
he fell from this happy state, and plunged into unspeakable wretchedness, did not 
dissolve his obligation to gratitude for the happy state in which he was at first 
placed, and the goodness of God to him herein, as it certainly did not; then, notwithstanding 
his and our sin has rendered us miserable, we are not for this reason under the 
less obligation to gratitude for the goodness of God to us in our creation, and 
the happy state in which he placed mankind, in which Adam and all his race would 
have continued forever, had they not fallen from it, by rebellion against their 
Creator.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.v-p39">III. We are hence led to see, and reflect upon, the magnitude 
and aggravation of the crime of the first rebellion of man against God. Man’s obligations 
were every way infinitely great to love and obey his Creator. The greatness, excellence 
and infinite worthiness of God, brought an infinite obligation on man to love and 
obey him. His deriving his being wholly from God, and the consequent absolute propriety 
and right God had to him, increased his obligation to devote all he was and all 
he had to him, to his honour and service. And his particular and great goodness 
to man unspeakably increased his obligations to obedience, love and gratitude. And 
as it was his supreme happiness to love, serve and enjoy God, and in this way only 
he could secure to himself and his posterity perfect and eternal felicity, and by 
refusing to do this, must bring upon himself the infinite displeasure of his Maker, 
and sink into complete and eternal wo, with all his posterity; this brought an immense 
addition of obligation on him, to love and obedience.<note n="158" id="iii.v-p39.1"><p class="normal" id="iii.v-p40">It has been thought by some, that to suppose every sin which men 
commit against God, is an infinite evil, or a crime infinitely great, is to make 
every sin of equal magnitude, and that, according to this, one crime cannot be greater 
and more aggravated than another. And this objection may arise in the minds of some 
readers, when they attend to this representation of the many aggravations of sin, 
by which the crime of it is increased, while it is at the same time asserted, that 
every sin is infinitely criminal, as it is committed against God.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.v-p41">All this may be easily obviated, only by observing, that every 
sin, and the deserved punishment of it, may be infinite in one respect; and yet 
some sins, and the just punishment of them, be unspeakably greater than others, 
there being in other respects a great difference. Two cords or cylinders may be 
considered as extended in length without end, or to be infinitely long, or of equal 
extension in length; and yet differ greatly in their diameters; and, in this respect, 
have vastly different degrees of magnitude. Two men may be in pain, and yet one 
of them may suffer an unspeakably greater degree of pain, than the other; and if 
the pain of each were continued without end, he who suffers the least would be doomed 
to infinite evil; yet the other must suffer evil, unspeakably greater, every minute.</p></note></p>

<pb n="202" id="iii.v-Page_202" />


<p class="normal" id="iii.v-p42">What finite mind can measure or comprehend die greatness, the 
aggravations of the crime, in man’s violating all these obligations, by rising in 
rebellion against his Creator and owner, and ungratefully abusing his infinite goodness 
to him! Surely the crime of this is unmeasurable by man or angels. We must pronounce 
it <i>boundless</i>, or infinite; which can therefore be comprehended by God alone, 
who has proclaimed the infinitude of it, by threatening it with infinite evil, even 
endless misery.</p>

</div2>

<div2 title="Chap. VI. Concerning Divine Providence in General." prev="iii.v" next="iii.vii" id="iii.vi">

<h2 id="iii.vi-p0.1">CHAP. VI.</h2>
<h3 id="iii.vi-p0.2">CONCERNING DIVINE PROVIDENCE IN GENERAL.</h3>
<p class="normal" id="iii.vi-p1">DIVINE Providence consists in preserving, directing and governing 
all creatures and things which are made; or in taking the most wise and effectual 
care of them, so as to make them answer the end for which they are created.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.vi-p2">God preserves or upholds all things by his powerful word; by the 
constant exertion of the same power, by which they were at first created, or caused 
to exist. Every created thing is constantly and entirely dependent on the Creator, 
for continuance in existence. Should that power which first caused it to exist be 
withdrawn, or cease to be exerted one moment, it would have no existence; it would 
cease to exist, and sink into its original nothing. It is impossible that a creature 
should be made, so as to exist one moment, in any respect or degree independent 
of the Creator; it must be as really and as much dependent on him for continuance 
in existence, as for its first existence. Therefore preservation is a constant exertion 
of the same power which first produced <pb n="203" id="iii.vi-Page_203" />the existence of the creature, 
in causing or giving continual existence; and is really <i>continued creation</i>.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.vi-p3">Every part of creation, and each creature and thing in it, from 
the greatest down to the least, is not only constantly upheld by the exertion of 
the same power which first gave existence; but is in all respects continually under 
the direction and governing power and care of the Creator, in every change, as to 
the place or manner of existence, and every motion, by which God orders, disposes 
and uses every thing in his creation, to accomplish his own infinitely wise and 
important designs. As God created all things for himself, in order to accomplish 
his own designs, being formed according to his pleasure; so he uses every thing, 
so as in the wisest and best manner to answer the end for which it was designed. 
If any the least thing were not so directed and used, as to answer the end designed, 
it would be created in vain; which is inconsistent with the wisdom and goodness 
of the Creator. God governs the world, and all things in it, by stated and fixed 
laws or rules, which are called the laws, or the course of nature, by which all 
motions and events take place, in a certain order, and constant series and connection 
of cause and effect. But this law, or course of nature, is nothing but divine power 
and wisdom constantly exerted, to cause things to take place in such a stated way 
and manner; or the divine will, establishing such an order in events; and does not 
suppose any power in creatures, or any created thing, to cause such motions and 
events, aside from the immediate exertion of divine power, which is the proper efficient 
cause of every event: so that all power is in God, and all creatures which act, 
or move, exist and move, or <i>are moved</i> in and by him.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.vi-p4">This fixed law and course of nature, which, as has been observed, 
is nothing but the divine will, wisely determined to operate in a certain, steady, 
fixed manner, by way of cause and effect, the same cause generally producing the 
same effect, is necessary in order to man’s gaining any proper knowledge of things 
around him, and obtaining any prudence and wisdom, with regard to the objects with 
which he is concerned, and by which he is to regulate his conduct, form his plans 
and prospects; <pb n="204" id="iii.vi-Page_204" />and to excite his hopes, fears and exertions. Were 
there no settled order and fixed connection in things and events, there would be 
no foundation for all this; but man would be involved in total darkness and uncertainty, 
without any knowledge and wisdom to conduct any of his affairs, or any motive to 
action, in matters relating to his body. And in this established order and connection 
in the visible creation, not only the power, but the wisdom, and steady counsel, 
the goodness, truth and faithfulness of him who worketh all things by the counsel 
of his own will, a e constantly manifested to man; which is asserted in the sacred 
writings.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.vi-p5">When this stated course of events, or these laws of nature, are 
interrupted and visibly counteracted, and events take place in a contrary manner; 
these events are called <i>miracles</i>, though there is no more power necessary, 
or really exerted and manifested in these, than there is in producing events according 
to the ordinary course of things. No more power is necessary or manifested in causing 
the sun to stand still, or move from West to East, than there is in causing it to 
keep a steady, uninterrupted course from East to West. The former would be a <i>
miracle</i>, the latter is not. The Governor of the world may and does, for wise 
reasons, and to answer important ends, thus visibly counteract the general course 
of things and events; and that on such occasions, and in those instances and ways, 
as not to frustrate the general and important ends to be answered by the steady 
course of things, which he has established. And in how many instances among the 
inconceivable number and variety of events which take place, they are brought about 
and caused to exist just at such a time, and in such a manner, not according to 
any stated law, or course of things, no man can tell; as the agent, by whose constant 
energy all things are conducted, is invincible to us; and may act immediately, or 
by the instrumentality of invisible agents; and yet this may be done, so as not 
visibly to counteract the stated laws or course of nature, or be the least obstruction 
to the exercise of human wisdom and prudence, in every thing in which men are concerned. 
No one can doubt of this, <pb n="205" id="iii.vi-Page_205" />who will carefully attend to the matter, 
and observe the representation of it in the holy scriptures. All such instances, 
be they ever so many, may be called <i>miracles</i>, though invisible to man, being 
out of the reach of our perception, as they are of the same nature and kind with 
those instances above mentioned, in which, what is called the course of nature, 
is visibly, or to our senses, counteracted, and events take place contrary to it, 
which we call miracles.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.vi-p6">This care and providence of God, in directing and governing all 
creatures and things, is <i>universal</i>, and constant, respecting all things at 
all times; and is extended to the least, as well as the greatest and more important 
existence; and is concerned in every event, however minute, and in our view inconsiderable. 
Not a sparrow, or the least bird or insect, falls to the ground, or dies, without 
the direction and agency of God. The hairs of our head are all carefully numbered; 
and so many and not one more are ordered to exist, and not one is removed or broken, 
without the order and operation of the divine hand. And this is equally true of 
every hair on men and beasts, and of each leaf in the forest, or spire of grass 
on the earth that ever have existed, or will exist, to the end of the world.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.vi-p7">In the exercise of this divine providence, some events take place 
by the more <i>immediate</i> energy and agency of God; and others by the instrumentality 
and agency of creatures, and by various mediums, and what are called <i>second causes</i>. 
But in all the events of the latter kind, the divine hand, power and energy, is 
as really and as much concerned and exerted, and is really as evident, and as much 
to be acknowledged, as if no instrument, agent, or second cause were used, or had 
any concern in the matter. Because the creature or the instrument has no power to 
act or effect any thing, independent of God, or which is not given to him by God. 
And is in the hand of God, as the axe or saw is in the hand of the workman. This 
is the light in which divine revelation every where represents the providence of 
God, as every one who carefully attends to it, must be sensible. And what has been 
observed shows that this is perfectly consonant <pb n="206" id="iii.vi-Page_206" />to reason; and that 
a different and contrary idea of divine providence is insupportable and inconsistent.<note n="159" id="iii.vi-p7.1"><p class="normal" id="iii.vi-p8">
That such a divine providence as is here described and asserted, which is rational, 
and every where supposed and held up to view in the Bible, is perfectly consistent 
with the moral agency and liberty of man, appears from a foregoing chapter on the 
decrees of God.</p></note></p>
<h2 id="iii.vi-p8.1">IMPROVEMENT.</h2>
<p class="normal" id="iii.vi-p9">I. From this scriptural view of divine providence, it appears, 
that they are in a great and dangerous error, who believe and assert, that the creation, 
and all creatures, when once made, have power to subsist of themselves, and stand 
alone by their own power, given to them in their creation; and to continue in motion 
and action, independent of any immediate exertion of divine energy, to support and 
direct them: that creation and creatures, once made and put in order, go on in a 
regular course <i>of their own accord</i>; and that God does never interpose, or 
take any farther care of the works of his hand. Every one who has attended to the 
Bible must be sensible that such a notion is very inconsistent with that: And it 
is most unreasonable, as it supposes that which is impossible, viz. That the creature 
may subsist of itself, when once made, in a measure independent of the Creator. 
This is contrary to all true philosophy: and at the same time dishonourable to God, 
as if he did not take a particular and wise care of the things he has made, and 
exercise and manifest his power, wisdom and goodness, in preserving and governing 
the world, and all things in it. And it tends to suppress and even eradicate all 
true piety, by leading to conceive of the Creator, as at a distance, and in a great 
measure out of sight; and as it obliterates a sense of our immediate dependence 
on God, and encourages self-dependence. In a word, it makes too much of creatures, 
and raises them infinitely too high, by which the Creator and Governor of the world 
is concealed and hid; whereas in a right view of divine providence, every creature 
and all events exhibit Deity to view, as constantly present in every thing, in the 
exercise of omniscience, power, wisdom, rectitude and goodness; and unite to impress <pb n="207" id="iii.vi-Page_207" />
that sense of the divine Being on the mind, and lead to that acknowledgment of him, 
in which all true piety most essentially consists.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.vi-p10">II. We are, therefore, in the next place, led to observe, that 
the true philosophical and scriptural account of divine providence, opens the most 
ample field for the exercise of piety and religion; as it leads us to see God in 
all things, and in every event; to fear him, trust in him, and acknowledge him in 
all our ways, feeling our immediate, constant, absolute dependence upon him. This 
leads us to hear him speaking important truths, in an intelligible language, by 
all creatures and things with which we are surrounded, and in all events; which 
calls for answerable exercises of prayer, acknowledgments, thanksgiving and praise, 
and a constant glorifying him, in whose hand is our breath and all our ways. Of 
such exercises and expressions of piety we have many examples in the holy scriptures; 
which, at the same time, appear perfectly rational.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.vi-p11">III. Hence we learn the reasonableness and duty of a cheerful 
submission to God, and acquiescence in the events which take place under his direction 
and providence. Not to submit is to oppose God and his will, and to resist infinite 
wisdom and goodness. Every event that takes place is under the immediate direction 
of unerring wisdom and goodness, and ordered for the greatest good, to promote the 
most important and best ends; and is therefore so far from being the reasonable 
ground of any reluctance and regret in us, that we ought not only <i>barely to submit</i>, 
but to acquiesce with pleasure, and rejoice that God reigns, and hath done, and 
continues to do, whatsoever he pleaseth; and worketh all things, according to the 
counsel of his own will.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.vi-p12">IV. How safe and happy are they who put their trust in God! He 
who directs and governs all things, and orders every event; who is infinitely above 
all control, on whom all things entirely depend; who does whatsoever he pleases 
in heaven and among the children of men on earth: He is engaged by repeated promises 
to them, that no evil shall come near them to hurt them: but that every thing shall 
work together for their good. If God be thus for them, who or what can be against 
them? 
<pb n="208" id="iii.vi-Page_208" />The Lord reigneth, let them who trust in him always rejoice. Weil 
may they say, “God is our refuge and strength, a very present help in trouble. Therefore 
will we not fear, though the earth be removed, and though the mountains be carried 
into the midst of the sea» Though the waters thereof roar and be troubled, though 
the mountains shake with the swelling thereof.” “Oh Lord of hosts, Blessed is the 
man that trusteth in thee!”</p>

</div2>

<div2 title="Chapter VII. On the Providence of God, as It Respects Moral Agents, Angels and Men." prev="iii.vi" next="iii.vii.i" id="iii.vii">

<h2 id="iii.vii-p0.1">CHAP. VII.</h2>
<h3 id="iii.vii-p0.2">ON THE PROVIDENCE OF GOD, AS IT RESPECTS MORAL AGENTS, ANGELS AND MEN.</h3>

<div3 title="Section I. Concerning Divine Providence, as it respects the Angels." prev="iii.vii" next="iii.vii.ii" id="iii.vii.i">
<h2 id="iii.vii.i-p0.1"><span class="sc" id="iii.vii.i-p0.2">Section I</span>.</h2>
<p class="center" id="iii.vii.i-p1"><i>Concerning Divine Providence, as it respects the Angels</i>.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.vii.i-p2">AS moral agents are the highest and most noble and important part 
of the creation, they are the end of all the rest; and all the inferior creatures 
and things were made, and are preserved and governed, for the sake of these, who 
are the subjects of moral government; which is by far the most excellent and important. 
Of these, we know of none but angels and men: And it has been observed, that we 
have no evidence that there are any other creatures in the created universe, capable 
of moral government. We know nothing of the existence, number, capacity or employment 
of angels, but what we learn from divine revelation. We are there informed, that 
in their original formation, they were made a higher rank of beings than man, and 
with greater natural capacities; that their number is very great; that they were 
made perfectly holy, and under law to God, otherwise there would have been no foundation 
for the fall and ruin of any of them, by disobedience and sin, which we are told 
has been in fact the case. And. were they not at first holy, there could have been 
no apostasy by rebellion, or by leaving their first state.</p>
<pb n="209" id="iii.vii.i-Page_209" />
<p class="normal" id="iii.vii.i-p3">But that they were under moral government, we maybe certain, from 
the reason and nature of the case. They being made rational creatures and moral 
agents, and so capable of moral government, must be under such a government, in 
order to be treated properly, or according to their nature and capacity. A moral 
law is essential to moral government; requiring of rational creatures those exercises, 
and that conduct, of which they are capable, and which are reasonable and proper. 
We are not expressly told what this law was, as it relates to angels, and what was 
particularly required of them. But we can be at no great loss about the general 
requirement of it. They must be under obligation, from the first of their existence, 
to love God with all their hearts, and their fellow creatures as themselves. This 
therefore was required of them. The law they were under must require this, as it 
was the rule of their duty; and therefore must require the whole of their duty. 
This law did not, strictly speaking, <i>make</i> it their duty to exercise and express 
this love; but required and commanded it, because it was their duty. And it could 
require no more, this being the whole of their duty; unless it were to point out 
in particular instances in what way they should exercise and express this love to 
God, and to other creatures, by express positive injunctions and prohibitions. How 
many, or whether any of these; or if there were any, in the law given to angels, 
we are not particularly and expressly informed.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.vii.i-p4">In order to this being a complete law, or having the nature of 
a law, so as to exercise and maintain moral government, there must be a <i>penalty</i> 
expressed or implied, threatening evil to disobedience to the precept: For if the 
creature be exposed to no evil, by disregarding the command, more than by obeying, 
he cannot be said to be under any moral <i>government</i>; nor does God express 
or exercise any authority, as moral Governor, if he neither inflicts nor threatens 
evil to the transgressor. And if it be a perfect law, and a perfect government, 
as God’s law and government certainly are, the evil or punishment threatened must 
be exactly proportioned to the crime, or the desert of the transgressor. And as 
the transgression of the law of God must be a <pb n="210" id="iii.vii.i-Page_210" />
crime proportioned in its magnitude, to the creature’s obligation to obedience; 
and this obligation is great in proportion to the excellence, dignity and authority 
of God, which are all infinite, it follows, as certain and clear as any mathematical 
demonstration, that such a crime is infinitely great; and therefore deserves a punishment 
which is infinitely great and dreadful, that is, an <i>endless punishment</i>.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.vii.i-p5">We therefore have sufficient light and evidence to determine, 
that the angels were under a law, requiring them to love God with all their hearts, 
and their fellow creatures as themselves; and to yield perfect obedience to every 
positive command which God had given, or should give to them; and threatening them 
with infinite evil, even endless destruction and misery, for the least single instance 
of disobedience: For no less than this was their duty, and therefore God must require 
it of them; and the least transgression, or neglect of coming up to their duty, 
could deserve no less than complete and endless evil; and therefore God must threaten 
it; or this must be the penalty of his perfect law.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.vii.i-p6">That the angels were under such a law, with such a penalty, is 
yet farther evident, if possible, from known fact, which has taken place. Some of 
the angels have sinned by transgressing this law; and for one, the first, transgression, 
they have fallen into endless destruction. For, St. Peter says, “God spared not 
the angels that <i>sinned</i>; but cast them down to hell, and delivered them into 
chains of darkness, to be reserved unto judgment.” And cur Saviour tells us what 
will be their doom at the day of judgment; and that they will then be cast <i>into 
everlasting fire</i>, which is prepared for them. We therefore know by this, had 
we no light from any other quarter, that the angels were under a law, requiring 
perfect obedience, and threatening every act of disobedience with endless destruction. 
The experiment has been actually made, and every one that <i>sinned</i>, that was 
guilty of the least deviation from perfect obedience to the law (for every such 
deviation is sin) has perished; has fallen into a state of endless misery. Therefore 
every transgression of the divine law; every <pb n="211" id="iii.vii.i-Page_211" />
sin deserves endless punishment; and this is the only proper penalty of such a law.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.vii.i-p7">The threatening of infinite evil to disobedience seems to imply 
a promise of good or happiness to obedience; or, at least, a continuance of existence 
in a state of happiness, so long as the creature continues obedient: For though 
annihilation be not a positive evil; yet it must appear to a happy creature, enjoying 
the pleasure of obedience, and of the favour of God, and having an ardent desire 
to serve and glorify him, to be an unspeakably great evil, though it be a negative 
one, to have his existence taken away; and be forever deprived of all his happiness, 
by annihilation. This would be to him a real and great punishment. And we have good 
reason to believe, that to annihilate such a creature, is not agreeable to infinite 
wisdom, rectitude and goodness; and therefore, that God never will do it; but we 
may be certain that every moral agent shall continue in existence and happiness, 
and enjoy the favour of God, so long as he continues in obedience; and that this 
is implied in the threatening: For a threatening to inflict evil on the disobedient, 
necessarily implies that he will not inflict any on the obedient, even the negative 
evil of ceasing to exist. And indeed the innocent and obedient must be considered 
as having a right to impunity. Hence, by the way, it appears, that moral agents 
must and will exist without end; as this is necessary, in order to the proper exercise 
of moral government, and their being the proper subjects of such government. For 
the moral law, which is essential to moral government, must threaten infinite evil 
to all who disobey it. Therefore the disobedient must exist forever, in order to 
suffer the evil threatened, and which they deserve. And those who never disobey 
can never cease to exist, consistent with the wisdom, rectitude and goodness of 
the Lawgiver and Governor.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.vii.i-p8">It may be farther observed, that there is reason to conclude, 
that the best and most perfect moral government, is not consistent with moral agents 
being continued in a state of trial, without end, so as to be continually exposed 
to fall by sin, and always remain in a total uncertainty, whether they shall persevere 
in obedience, <pb n="212" id="iii.vii.i-Page_212" />or fall into endless perdition, by transgression. That 
there should be a time for such trial, is certainly proper, and necessary to answer 
the best ends in moral government. How long this time shall be, and with what particular 
circumstances it is best it should be attended, the infinitely wise and sovereign 
Governor only, is able, and has a right to determine. It is also certain that God 
is not so obliged in justice to the obedient creature, to confirm him in holiness 
and happiness, after the longest term of obedience, that he would do any injury 
or wrong to him, if he should not grant this favour. For the creature can never 
merit or deserve such a reward by any obedience whatsoever; so that eternal life 
should be a debt due to him, for what he has done. The creature by giving all he 
has, that is, by perfect and constant obedience to the law of God, gives no more 
than he constantly owes to God, or only just pays a debt which is due; and therefore 
continually demanded of him. Therefore he can have no demand on his Maker, of any 
positive reward, or of any thing which is due to him.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.vii.i-p9">But notwithstanding all this, considering how undesirable it must 
be to the obedient creature, to be always in suspense, knowing himself in danger 
every moment, of falling into sin, and eternal ruin; and that he depends wholly 
upon God for preservation from this evil; and that he is under no obligation to 
grant it: And, on the contrary, considering how very desirable and pleasing it must 
be to such a creature, to arrive to a state of certainty that he shall never fall 
into sin and misery; being confirmed by God, in a state of perfect holiness and 
happiness forever: And considering what a strong motive and great encouragement 
to obedience, it would afford to the creature, for God to promise him, that upon 
his continuance in obedience for a set time, which he will fix, he shall be confirmed 
in his favour, in holiness and happiness forever, without any possibility of falling 
into sin and ruin: And since such a promise, on such a condition, would be a striking 
manifestation of God’s love of virtue and holiness, in that he grants so great a 
reward of the obedience of his creatures; and an expression of his bountiful munificence 
and infinite goodness: Considering <pb n="215" id="iii.vii.i-Page_215" />all this, and more that might be 
mentioned, is there not reason to conclude that such a promise is essential to the 
best and most perfect moral government; and that this promise is always implied 
or expressed, in God’s law, under which all moral agents are originally placed, 
and which threatens infinite evil to the transgressor? Such a law or constitution, 
with such requirements, promises and threatenings, may be called <i>a covenant</i>, 
in which what is required of the creature is stated and fixed; and the rule and 
manner of God’s conduct towards him, and treatment of him, is also revealed and 
established.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.vii.i-p10">That the angels were under such a constitution, law or covenant, 
which not only threatened endless punishment to the disobedient, but promised a 
confirmation in holiness and happiness upon their continuing obedient, through a 
certain time of trial, and that this time of trial is long since over, is evident 
from scripture, in that they were in the apostles’ days called <i>elect angels</i>, 
which denotes their being fixed in holiness and the favour of God; or that they 
had a sure title to eternal life. And the endless torment of the wicked is represented 
as being in the presence or sight of the holy angels, which supposes, at least, 
that they will be holy and happy without end.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.vii.i-p11">How long the time of trial was before they were confirmed, who 
continued obedient; and what was the special test and trial of their obedience, 
if there were any; and what was the particular temptation and sin of those who fell 
into rebellion and ruin, we are not expressly informed in divine revelation. Yet 
perhaps it will appear that we are not left wholly in the dark, respecting these 
particulars, if we attend to the following things, some of which seem to be suggested 
from the holy scriptures, and are here offered as being probable.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.vii.i-p12">It has been observed, that it appears from scripture, that man 
is more an ultimate end, than the angels; that angels were made to answer ends respecting 
man, and in this sense were made for man; and that this appears from the use which 
God makes of the angels, in giving and subjecting them all to Christ, as the Redeemer 
of man, to be improved by him as instruments of promoting <pb n="214" id="iii.vii.i-Page_214" />his designs 
in the redemption of sinners; and to minister to, and serve the redeemed from among 
mankind; and that they were therefore created for Christ, considered as God, Man, 
Mediator, and Redeemer of sinners, and are <i>his</i> angels, to be used by him 
in carrying on his great designs in the redemption of his church.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.vii.i-p13">May we not infer from this, that when the angels and man were 
made, the angels were, in some way, made to know, that God had peculiar and grand 
designs to answer by man; that, though mankind were made so much inferior to them; 
yet they were to be the peculiar favourites of Heaven; and that one of that race 
in the human nature, even a Man, should be the head of a most glorious kingdom; 
and be the Lord of angels, to whom they must yield a most ready obedience; being 
employed by him in ministering to, and serving his friends and subjects of the human 
race: That this was one end for which they were made; and that their cheerfully 
complying with the revealed will of God, in this matter, and submitting to this 
person as their Lord, and serving him, and his friends of the human race, should 
be the particular test of their obedience and faithfulness; and if they did cordially 
acquiesce in this design, and persevere in obedience to this revelation and command, 
through the time of their trial, they should be confirmed in holiness and happiness 
forever. As this now appears to have been God’s design, respecting the angels, and 
that he made them for this end; and as this was doubtless the greatest trial, whether 
they would be obedient in all things, is it not reasonable to suppose, that so much 
of this divine scheme was revealed to the angels, as was necessary to give them 
opportunity, voluntarily to consent, and acquiesce in it, and cheerfully devote 
themselves to this service?</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.vii.i-p14">This revelation and injunction of the Most High, made known in 
a degree and manner agreeable to infinite wisdom, was most probably the occasion 
of the rebellion of those angels who sinned; they disapproved, and refused to comply 
with it. Lucifer, who was at the head of all the angels, the highest and most noble 
creature that God had made, was displeased with such a <pb n="215" id="iii.vii.i-Page_215_1" />
plan: Pride entered his heart, and he was not willing, he refused to obey this command, 
and stoop so low as to become a servant to the inferior, diminutive creature man, 
and be subjected to serve and adore one in the human nature, as his lord and king. 
This immediately sunk him down from his high station; and by his example and influence, 
myriads of angels went off, and joined with him in rebellion. Thus they by sin left 
their first station, and were banished from heaven; and by the arm of the Almighty 
were cast down to hell.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.vii.i-p15">This, perhaps, will in the most natural way account for the head 
of these fallen angels, immediately entering upon a plan to seduce and ruin man, 
by tempting him to sin, as <i>he</i> had done; supposing that he should hereby effectually 
defeat God’s revealed designs, respecting him, against which he had rebelled. And 
this may also in the best manner account for his opposing with all his cunning and 
might, and by all his servants and angels, the redemption and salvation of men; 
and his hating and opposing the Redeemer, and attempting to defeat him in his designs, 
in every possible way, and to destroy every one of the human race; being a peculiar 
enemy to the church, and all the friends of Christ. To all this he is naturally 
led by his first sin, and is only persevering in opposing that, against which he 
rose, in his first rebellion.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.vii.i-p16">This apostasy, whatever was the occasion of it, was a very important 
event indeed, the consequences of which will continue to eternity. It, with many 
of its consequences, are, in themselves considered, infinitely dreadful. But the 
designs of the Most High are not in the least frustrated by all this; but his council 
and plan are hereby established; and this was necessary to bring to effect, and 
complete his infinitely wise purposes.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.vii.i-p17">It has been observed, that there is evidence from scripture, that 
the angels who have not sinned are now, and have been, long since, in a confirmed 
state; And from what has been now supposed, concerning the special trial of their 
obedience, it has been thought that they continued in a state of trial, until the 
ascension of our Lord Jesus Christ; and that they were then confirmed in holiness, 
and his favour, They were obedient <pb n="210" id="iii.vii.i-Page_210_1" />to the divine orders, and all attention 
to man, particularly to the church and people of God, willingly ministering to them, 
and serving them and their Lord, from the fall of man to the incarnation of the 
Son of God. But their greatest trial did not take place, until he who was in the 
form of God, and thought it not robbery to be equal with God, took upon him the 
form of a servant, and was made in the likeness of men, being born of a poor virgin, 
and laid an infant in a manger; when he appeared as an outcast in the wilderness, 
assaulted and tempted by the devil; when he lived a poor despised man; and was finally 
apprehended, being betrayed by one of his disciples into the hands of men, and condemned 
as a malefactor, and crucified and buried in a tomb. In this time, while the Son 
of God was in this state of humiliation, the angels continued to own him as their 
Lord, they attended upon him constantly, and were his willing, faithful servants. 
They attended him when in a manger, and with pleasure carried the joyful news of 
his birth to the shepherds, and the whole multitude of them sang praises on the 
occasion. They were with him when in the wilderness, assaulted by Satan, and ministered 
to him. They assisted and strengthened him when he was in an agony in the garden. 
And when on the cross, and in the grave, they were his constant attendants; and 
proclaimed his resurrection from the dead, to his disciples. And when he ascended 
from earth to heaven, and sat down on the throne of the universe, ail these mighty 
angels came down and attended upon him, and ascended with him with joy, and added 
to the triumph and splendor of that event: And when they saw him seated in glory, 
all heaven was filled with a joy which never was known there before; and all these 
angels renewedly devoted themselves to the service of Christ and his church; and 
were made voluntarily subject unto him. Then, it is supposed probable, Christ their 
Lord said unto them, “Well done, good and faithful servants, you have been faithful 
to me through the time of my, and your greatest trial, and have persevered in the 
most willing and cheerful obedience: I therefore now put an end to your state of 
trial, and publicly confirm you in holiness and happiness, and <pb n="217" id="iii.vii.i-Page_217" />confer 
on you the reward of eternal life.” And as their election of God to eternal life 
was now made known, they are after this, but not before, called “elect angels.”</p>

</div3>

<div3 title="Section II. Concerning the Providence of God, as it respects Man in a state of Innocency." prev="iii.vii.i" next="iii.viii" id="iii.vii.ii">
<h2 id="iii.vii.ii-p0.1"><span class="sc" id="iii.vii.ii-p0.2">Section II</span>.</h2>
<p class="center" id="iii.vii.ii-p1"><i>Concerning the Providence of God, as it respects Man in a state 
of Innocency</i>.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.vii.ii-p2">Man being made upright, or perfectly holy, this necessarily supposes 
a rule of right, or that there was a <i>right</i> and <i>wrong</i> in moral character 
and conduct: and that God did, and could not but require or command that which is 
morally right, and forbid the contrary; or, in other words, that man was under moral 
government, which supposes a law requiring perfect obedience of him, or his whole 
duty, and forbidding all disobedience, on pain of suffering the just desert of it. 
What has been observed in the foregoing section of angels, respecting the nature 
of the moral government, and the law under which they were;<note n="160" id="iii.vii.ii-p2.1"><p class="normal" id="iii.vii.ii-p3">Page 208, 209, 
210.</p></note> is equally applicable to man: and proves that he was certainly and necessarily 
under such a law, which required him to love God with all his heart, and his neighbour 
as himself, and to express this in all proper ways; and to obey every precept which 
God should give him; with a penalty annexed, threatening every instance of disobedience 
with a punishment exactly answerable to the crime, which must be endless suffering. 
So much is certainly essential to moral government, and necessary, in order to man’s 
being treated as a moral agent, by his Creator.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.vii.ii-p4">We have indeed no particular account of this law, or history of 
man’s being put under this moral government, in the inspired narrative which Moses 
has given of the primitive state of innocency. And there is this very good reason 
to be given for it, viz. <i>because it was entirely needless</i>. The most express 
narrative of this matter would not have made it more plain and certain than it now 
is: There is now as great and as clear evidence of <pb n="218" id="iii.vii.ii-Page_218" />
it, as there is, that man was created with a capacity for moral agency, and is a 
proper subject of moral government, as has been proved. But if this were not so 
evident from the nature of the case, it might be demonstrated from what has been 
since revealed. St. Paul, speaking of the law under which all mankind are, asserts 
the tenor of it in these words, “Cursed is every one that continueth not in all 
the things which are written in the book of the law, to do them.”<note n="161" id="iii.vii.ii-p4.1"><p class="normal" id="iii.vii.ii-p5"><scripRef id="iii.vii.ii-p5.1" passage="Gal. iii. 10" parsed="|Gal|3|10|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Gal.3.10">Gal. iii. 
10</scripRef>.</p></note> This law must have existed before man sinned, and while he had opportunity, 
and was in a capacity to continue to do every thing required by it; for if man, 
when in these circumstances, was not under this law, with this sanction, and bound 
by it, there could be no reason or propriety in making this requirement on such 
a penalty, when man had already violated it, and rendered it impossible to come 
up to, or do what is required: Which the Apostle says is the case with all mankind, 
since the original apostasy; for they are all under the curse of this law. It necessarily 
follows, therefore, that man was originally made under this law, when in a state 
of innocency, which denounced a curse upon him, if he failed of perfect obedience. 
This curse implies in it all the evil that man is capable of suffering, even endless 
destruction; and will take place in its fulness, and without any abatement on those 
to whom Christ, at the day of judgment, will say, “Depart from me, <i>ye cursed</i>, 
into everlasting fire.” We must look forward to this time, to see it completely 
executed. This then, we may be sure, is the penalty of the law, under which man 
was placed, when he became a subject of moral government; which is also true of 
angels, as has been proved in the preceding section. So far therefore, we go on
<i>sure</i> ground: No particular express revelation could make it more evident 
and certain: Therefore we may see good reason why we have no such revelation.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.vii.ii-p6">It has been observed, that the sum of duty required in the moral 
law, is <span class="sc" id="iii.vii.ii-p6.1">love</span>: To love God with all the heart, and our neighbour 
as ourselves. This we are sure of from the express declaration of Christ.<note n="162" id="iii.vii.ii-p6.2"><p class="normal" id="iii.vii.ii-p7">
<scripRef id="iii.vii.ii-p7.1" passage="Matt. xxii. 37" parsed="|Matt|22|37|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Matt.22.37">Matt. xxii. 37</scripRef>, <scripRef passage="Matt 22:40" id="iii.vii.ii-p7.2" parsed="|Matt|22|40|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Matt.22.40">40</scripRef>.</p></note> He has reduced the whole moral law to this, and said 
that, “On <pb n="219" id="iii.vii.ii-Page_219" />these two commandments, hang all the <i>law</i> and the 
prophets.” This includes and enjoins obedience to all special or positive directions 
and commands, which God may be pleased to give at any time; for love to God implies 
obedience to all his particular commands, as disregard to any of his injunctions, 
is contrary to love to him. How many, and what particular and positive commands 
God gave to man, when he was at first created, and in a state of innocency, we are 
not told: But some of them are expressed, or may be collected from what is related. 
A Sabbath was instituted, God blessed and sanctified the seventh day from the beginning 
of the creation, which Christ says, “was made <i>for man</i>;” and therefore he 
must have been commanded to keep it holy, or dedicate it to sacred uses in the worship 
of God, &amp;c. laying aside the business and employment which might be attended on 
other days. God instituted marriage, and consequently all the duties peculiar to 
such a relation; and commanded man to multiply, and fill the earth, and subdue and 
cultivate it. He gave him authority and dominion over all inferior creatures; which 
is a command to exercise government and dominion over them, and use them for his 
convenience and profit: But it appears from another direction, that he was forbid 
to kill and eat them for sustenance; and probably was not allowed to put an end 
to the life of any animal, on any occasion. The direction or command mentioned, 
is in the following words, “And God said, behold, I have given you every herb bearing 
seed, which is upon the face of all the earth, and every tree, in the which is the 
fruit of a tree yielding seed: <i>To you it shall be for meat</i>.” Thus they were 
commanded to live on vegetables, and had no license to eat animal food; but a prohibition 
of this is implied. He was ordered into the garden of Eden, and commanded to dress, 
and to keep it. He was allowed to eat of every tree of the garden except one; and 
he was commanded not to eat of that, upon the severest penalty. “And the Lord God 
commanded the man, saying. Of every tree of the garden thou mayest freely eat: But 
of the tree of knowledge of good and evil, thou shalt not eat of it; for in the 
day that thou eatest thereof, thou shalt surely die.”</p>
<pb n="220" id="iii.vii.ii-Page_220" />
<p class="normal" id="iii.vii.ii-p8">We cannot justly infer, from this prohibition or command only 
being mentioned, that man was not prohibited the violation of the moral law, in 
every instance, upon the same penalty; or that there were no other positive commands 
given to him, guarded with an equally severe threatening, in case of disobedience; 
or that this prohibition was the only test of his obedience; or that if he had violated 
any other command, it would not have been attended with equally fatal consequences. 
The contrary has been proved above; by which it is very evident, it is presumed, 
to all who will properly consider the matter, that they who have supposed any of 
those things, have no reasonable foundation for what they have believed and asserted. 
This positive prohibition, with the threatened penalty, is thus particularly mentioned, 
for two very good reasons: <i>First</i>, because it was a positive prohibition or 
command, and therefore it could not have been known that man was forbidden to eat 
of that particular tree, unless it had been thus particularly narrated. <i>Secondly</i>, 
because man actually fell from his innocence and happiness, and incurred the threatened 
penalty, by disregarding this prohibition, and eating of the fruit of this forbidden 
tree. Had he sinned by transgressing any other positive command, which we know nothing 
of now; <i>that</i>, in this case, would have been as particularly mentioned, with 
the same penalty, as this now is, and we should have heard nothing of this, in a 
history so concise, as that which Moses was inspired to give, in which not a word 
is mentioned, which was not necessary, in order to understand the important story; 
leaving many things implied in the history, to be investigated or inferred from 
what is written, or to be farther opened and explained in some future revelation.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.vii.ii-p9">It has been a great question, What this threatening imports? What 
is meant by the <span class="sc" id="iii.vii.ii-p9.1">death</span> here threatened to disobedience? Those 
who have attempted to answer it, have done it very differently. Some have been confident, 
that it intends only the death of the body, or the separation of soul and body; 
to which all men are now condemned; to which Adam, and in him all his posterity, 
was sentenced, after man had transgressed, “Dust thou art, and unto dust shalt 
thou return.” Others suppose <pb n="221" id="iii.vii.ii-Page_221" />that a total annihilation of soul and 
body is intended; so that if the threatening had been executed without any mitigation 
or remedy, Adam and Eve would have been annihilated, and none of their posterity 
would have had actual existence. Others have thought, that by dying is meant their 
becoming totally corrupt or sinful, “dead in trespasses and sins,” which is denominated
<i>spiritual death</i>. The most general and common opinion has been, that it includes 
the death of the body, which is called <i>temporal death</i>, and <i>spiritual death</i>, 
and also <i>eternal death</i>, or endless misery; or as it is commonly expressed, 
“Death, temporal, spiritual, and eternal.”</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.vii.ii-p10">Instead of attempting directly to confute all or any of these 
different opinions, or to vindicate any one of them, it is thought the most likely 
and easy way to get satisfactory evidence of the real and true meaning of this threatening, 
denounced against man, if he transgressed the divine prohibition, is to endeavour 
to find some clue which will lead us into it, so as to give all desirable evidence 
and satisfaction, that we have fixed on the truth. Perhaps such an one may be investigated. 
In this view, the following things must be observed, and carefully examined, and 
put together.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.vii.ii-p11"><i>First</i>, Every transgression of God’s law or command, is 
a crime of such magnitude, that no punishment is adequate and answerable to it, 
so as to express the turpitude and ill desert of the sinner, but that which contains 
infinite evil. Or every violation of the law of God is infinitely criminal, is an 
infinite moral evil; and therefore deserves a punishment infinitely great and dreadful, 
and which contains infinite natural evil. This has been brought into view above, 
and the evidence of it exhibited, so that it is needless to say much upon it here. 
That all sin against God is infinitely criminal, every one must grant, or be inconsistent 
with himself, who will allow that it is a greater crime for a child to abuse his 
kind, excellent father, than to injure the meanest servant in the family; and that 
the former deserves a much greater punishment than the latter. For by allowing this, 
he grants that the crime of abusing another, is greater or less, according to the 
degree of worth and excellency of him who is injured, and to the relation in which 
he <pb n="222" id="iii.vii.ii-Page_222" />
stands to him. And this is granting that to injure and abuse a Being of infinite 
greatness, authority, dignity, worth and excellence, who, in the highest sense, 
is our father, friend and benefactor, must be infinitely criminal. But this is true 
of every sin against God. Therefore every sin against God, which is an injury and 
abuse offered to him, is a crime of infinite magnitude; consequently the sinner 
must be punished with infinite evil, if he has his desert.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.vii.ii-p12">Again, if it be evident and certain that every criminal deserves 
all that punishment or natural evil, which his criminal deed tends to produce, or 
would certainly follow, were it not prevented by some other person or counteracting 
power, which, it is presumed, all will allow; then every transgression of the divine 
law, deserves infinite evil. Upon this ground a number of the laws given by Moses 
are founded, and cannot be proved to be just, if this be not admitted as a truth. 
It was commanded that if a man injured his neighbour, and brought any evil upon 
him, by depriving him of his life, limbs or senses, he should be punished, by suffering 
the same, or as great evil. “Thine eye shall have no pity; but life shall go for 
life, eye for eye, tooth for tooth, hand for hand, foot for foot.”<note n="163" id="iii.vii.ii-p12.1"><p class="normal" id="iii.vii.ii-p13"><scripRef id="iii.vii.ii-p13.1" passage="Deut. xix. 21" parsed="|Deut|19|21|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Deut.19.21">Deut. xix. 
21</scripRef>.</p></note> And it is to be observed, that not only he who actually did evil to another, 
and took away his life or any of his limbs, but he who <i>attempted</i> or <i>aimed</i> 
to do this, and did that which tended to effect it, though it did not actually take 
place, but was prevented, was himself to be punished with the evil, which he willed 
and designed to bring on his neighbour.<note n="164" id="iii.vii.ii-p13.2"><p class="normal" id="iii.vii.ii-p14"><scripRef id="iii.vii.ii-p14.1" passage="Deut. xix. 16-21" parsed="|Deut|19|16|19|21" osisRef="Bible:Deut.19.16-Deut.19.21">Deut. xix. 16-21</scripRef>.</p></note> By the same 
rule, if a man should murder a thousand men, or will and design to do it, he would 
deserve to die a thousand deaths, or lose a thousand lives, and this punishment 
might justly be inflicted, were he capable of suffering it, or had so many lives 
to lose.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.vii.ii-p15">Now, according to this, as has just been asserted, <i>every transgression 
of the divine law deserves infinite evil</i>. For every instance of opposition to 
God, which every sin is, is an attempt to destroy his being, or to take away <pb n="223" id="iii.vii.ii-Page_223" />
his happiness, and make him infinitely miserable; to put an end to his government, 
and introduce universal confusion and misery, through the whole creation; and the 
rebel would be glad to effect all this, and would do it, were it in his power. Therefore 
he deserves to suffer infinite evil; even all the evil which he is capable of suffering.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.vii.ii-p16">If any proposition relating to things of a moral nature be capable 
of the clearest demonstration, this is such an one. And this is a chief corner stone 
in the science of theology. Whatever is properly built upon it must stand, and every 
proposition naturally and necessarily following from it, or that can evidently be 
deduced, must be a truth.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.vii.ii-p17"><i>Secondly</i>, It is essential to a perfect moral government, 
that there be a law pointing out and requiring what is right, and the duty of the 
subject, and threatening all transgression of it with a punishment exactly answerable 
to the crime.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.vii.ii-p18">This has been considered before, and it is hoped, has been made 
so evident and certain, that every one who examines it with care and impartiality, 
will be satisfied, that it is an important truth. However, in addition to what has 
been said in support of this proposition, the following things may have weight.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.vii.ii-p19">1. If there could be a law, and any proper moral government without 
a penalty threatening punishment to the transgressor, (which, as it has been observed, 
is impossible) yet it could not be so good and perfect a law and government, as 
that which threatens punishment to the disobedient, and by which the transgressor 
is exposed to suffer some evil, at least. This appears so evident, in itself, at 
first view, and is so demonstrably certain, from the many threatenings of punishment 
to transgressors in divine revelation, that there is no need of attempting to adduce 
farther evidence. If threatenings of evil to transgressors were not necessary in 
the most perfect government, they could not be found in the divine laws and government: 
Nor could that threatening which we are now considering have been made to man.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.vii.ii-p20">2. It is necessary in order to the most perfect government, not 
only that there should be a penalty, or a law <pb n="224" id="iii.vii.ii-Page_224" />threatening evil to 
the transgressor: but that the threatened evil should be neither more nor less than 
the crime deserves.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.vii.ii-p21">If the evil threatened be greater than the crime deserves, the 
law would be unjust. If it be less than the demerit of the transgressor, the ends 
of a threatened penalty will be wholly, or in a measure defeated; and therefore 
the law and government will be proportionably imperfect and defective. This will 
appear by considering what are the principal ends to be answered by threatening 
punishment.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.vii.ii-p22">One end is, to deter the subject from transgressing the law, and 
prevent rebellion. Now, it is easy to see, that a greater and more dreadful punishment 
is better suited to answer this end, than a less, if it be not greater than the 
crime deserves. Therefore so far as this end is regarded in threatening a penalty, 
it will require it to be as great as the sin deserves; and if a law threatens a 
less punishment, it is so far defective, and not suited in the best manner to answer 
this end of a threatened penalty: Which cannot be supposed of the divine law and 
government; because that is in all respects absolutely perfect.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.vii.ii-p23">Another end of the threatening is to state and express the evil 
nature of sin, and show how great the crime is, in the estimation of the legislator. 
The preceptive part of the law does not determine the ill desert of the transgressor. 
This is to be seen only in the penalty threatened. This determines how criminal 
sin is, in the sight of God; and what evil it deserves as a punishment. In this 
view, it is necessary that the punishment threatened should be as great, and contain 
as much evil, as sin deserves, and be exactly proportioned to it. By this, the law 
becomes the standard of truth, while it declares not only what is sin, but how sinful 
or criminal it is. It is with reference to this, that St. Paul says, “That 
sin, by the commandment, might become <i>exceeding sinful</i>.” In these words he 
has particular respect to the penalty of the law or punishment threatened, by which 
he was slain, and <i>death</i> was wrought in him, even the <i>death</i> threatened 
to every transgressor; of which he speaks in the words immediately preceding. Sin 
becomes <pb n="225" id="iii.vii.ii-Page_225" />
exceeding sinful, that is, appears to be criminal, beyond expression, by the infinite 
evil which the law threatens, as the proper desert of it. In this view, to threaten 
a less punishment would be deviating from the truth, and tend to deceive; or, at 
least, one important end of the divine law and government could not be answered.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.vii.ii-p24">We therefore have the greatest assurance that the law of God threatens 
a punishment, exactly proportioned to the desert of sin.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.vii.ii-p25">Another end to be answered in the divine government, by the penalty 
of the law, is to express the sacred authority and worthiness of the Most High, 
and the desert of sin and rebellion against him. The binding authority of a law, 
and of the lawgiver, is expressed in the threatening only; and in order to there 
being an expression of infinite authority, the evil threatened must be infinite; 
for where there is less authority and right to govern, a less evil may be threatened 
to disobedience, and executed; and this will be no expression of infinite authority. 
And the dignity, worthiness and importance of the legislator, and the greatness 
and ill desert of the crime, of transgressing the law, and despising him and his 
government, appear and are expressed in the punishment threatened to the transgressor. 
If treason against the king be threatened with no greater punishment, than is an 
attempt upon the life of a common subject, this represents the former to be no greater 
a crime than the latter; and instead of properly expressing the importance and dignity 
of the king, and the worth of his life, it degrades him, and sets him upon a level 
with all his subjects. The greater the evil is, which the threatening denounces 
against him who slights and opposes the Supreme Legislator, and his law and government, 
the more is his worth and excellence expressed; and the more fully is discovered 
and asserted the sacred importance and perfection of his law. Therefore if the law 
do not threaten as great a punishment as the crime deserves, it will not assert 
the greatness of the crime, nor the real worthiness and importance of God, and his 
law and government, but the contrary; and therefore must be a very imperfect, deficient 
law. From this, it appears <pb n="226" id="iii.vii.ii-Page_226" />
most certain, that the infinitely distinguished and sacred authority, dignity and 
worthiness of God, and importance and excellence of his government, and infinite 
greatness of the crime and ill desert of rebellion, cannot be properly, and in the 
most clear and striking manner expressed and asserted, unless an infinitely great 
and distinguished evil be threatened to every transgression of the law; an evil 
which no other legislator ought to threaten, or is able to inflict: And therefore 
not to threaten such evil, or to threaten one infinitely less, is undesirable and 
wrong, and cannot be supposed of an infinitely wise and perfect government. If God 
threatens and punishes, he must threaten and punish like himself; and nothing short 
of infinite evil must be the threatened punishment.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.vii.ii-p26">Another end to be answered by the penalty of the divine law, is 
to manliest and express the Legislator’s infinite hatred and abhorrence of ail moral 
evil, and how much he is displeased with the sinner. God is certainly infinitely 
displeased with sin, as it opposes his being and infinite felicity, and all the 
good of the universe, and tends to produce infinite mischief, to involve the universe 
in total and eternal confusion and misery. His displeasure with sin and hatred of 
it, must be as great as his love of holiness, and the infinite good of the universe. 
This is therefore essential to the divine character and perfection, in which his 
glory consists; and consequently it is desirable, and of infinite importance that 
it should be manifested and expressed in the most clear and strongest manner, in 
his moral government, and in his law, which is the foundation and rule of it. But 
this cannot be done, by merely requiring obedience, and forbidding sin. In order 
to the expression being as clear and strong as possible, God must threaten sin with 
a punishment equal to the greatness of the crime, and manifest a disposition to 
execute the threatening, and inflict the punishment. To threaten sin with a less 
punishment than it deserves, is so far from expressing a proper hatred of it, that 
it is, in a degree, favouring sin and the sinner. And not to threaten any punishment, 
or to threaten only that which is infinitely less than the crime deserves, is to 
manifest infinitely less displeasure with the sinner, than God has, and which it 
becomes <pb n="227" id="iii.vii.ii-Page_227" />him to express; and it would be favouring the sinner infinitely 
too much, and discouraging, and tending to prevent sin, unspeakably less than is 
proper and necessary in a good and perfect government; therefore would be infinitely 
dishonourable to God, and his government: And one great and important end of threatening 
and punishing the transgressor would not be answered.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.vii.ii-p27">And now, it must be left to the impartial, who will attentively 
consider what has been offered under this head, whether the evidence does not amount 
to a certainty, even to a clear demonstration, that in the most perfect moral government 
of God, his law must threaten evil to the transgressor, which is answerable to his 
crime, or as great as he deserves.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.vii.ii-p28"><i>Thirdly</i>, The threatening under consideration, “For in the 
day thou eatest thereof, thou shalt surely die,” is the threatening of the divine 
law, and must be considered as annexed or belonging to every divine command, and 
expresses the punishment which every transgression deserves: And therefore is a 
threatening of infinite evil.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.vii.ii-p29">This appears from what has been observed, that there was nothing 
so special in this prohibition, that could be a reason why it should be attended 
with a peculiar and distinguished threatening. This same death was the threatened 
evil, as the punishment of the transgression of any command or prohibition, which 
was given to man; and it is mentioned with regard to this prohibition or command, 
because the penalty was incurred by transgressing this; and not because this was 
a penalty peculiar to this prohibition, which was not threatened for any other transgression, 
and would not have taken place on rebellion against any other command, whether moral 
or positive.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.vii.ii-p30">We have an absolute certainty of this, two ways.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.vii.ii-p31">1. From what has been proved under the observation preceding that, 
now under consideration, viz. That in the best and most perfect government, which 
the moral government of God certainly is, the penalty threatened in the law to the 
transgressor of it, must be as great an evil as the crime deserves. This prohibition, 
or command, was contained in the law given to man; it was the law of God, and therefore 
disobedience to it, deserved <pb n="228" id="iii.vii.ii-Page_228" />
as great a punishment, as disobedience to other commands; and indeed, offending 
in this one point, was sinning against the whole law, and every command in it: But 
every sin, every act of disobedience, deserves infinite evil; hence it follows, 
with the greatest certainty, that this is a threatening of a punishment, which involves 
infinite evil, the just desert of every sin.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.vii.ii-p32">2. That the death here threatened implies and intends endless 
misery, we may be very certain, in that such an evil is intended by death and dying, 
in other parts of divine revelation. This is always meant by death, or dying, when 
these words are used to denote the penalty of the divine law, or the punishment 
which impenitent sinners will suffer, on whom the threatened penalty will fall, 
without mitigation. Any one may know this, who attends well to the Bible. How often 
are these words used in this sense by the prophet Ezekiel, in the <scripRef passage="Ezek 3:1-27" id="iii.vii.ii-p32.1" parsed="|Ezek|3|1|3|27" osisRef="Bible:Ezek.3.1-Ezek.3.27">
3d</scripRef>, <scripRef passage="Ezek 18:1-32" id="iii.vii.ii-p32.2" parsed="|Ezek|18|1|18|32" osisRef="Bible:Ezek.18.1-Ezek.18.32">
18th</scripRef>, and <scripRef passage="Ezek 33:1-33" id="iii.vii.ii-p32.3" parsed="|Ezek|33|1|33|33" osisRef="Bible:Ezek.33.1-Ezek.33.33">33d</scripRef> chapters of 
his prophecy? It is there repeatedly said, that the impenitent, wicked man shall
<i>die</i>, and <i>surely die</i>, the very words of the threatening under consideration: 
which death the penitent shall escape. It must therefore mean the sufferings for 
his sins in a future state. Christ saith, he that eateth his flesh, shall not die. 
Verily, verily, I say unto you. If a man keep my saying, he shall <i>never see death</i>. 
Whosoever believeth in me, shall <i>never die</i>.<note n="165" id="iii.vii.ii-p32.4"><p class="normal" id="iii.vii.ii-p33"><scripRef id="iii.vii.ii-p33.1" passage="John vi. 50" parsed="|John|6|50|0|0" osisRef="Bible:John.6.50">John vi. 50</scripRef>.—<scripRef passage="John 8:51" id="iii.vii.ii-p33.2" parsed="|John|8|51|0|0" osisRef="Bible:John.8.51">viii. 
51</scripRef>.—<scripRef passage="John 11:26" id="iii.vii.ii-p33.3" parsed="|John|11|26|0|0" osisRef="Bible:John.11.26">xi. 26</scripRef>.</p></note> Here, not 
to die, does not mean there shall not be a separation between soul and body: for 
none escape this; but, dying is put in opposition to eternal life, and therefore 
must mean eternal death, or endless punishment. St. Paul says, “the wages of sin 
is death.” The wages of sin is the proper punishment of sin, or that which sin deserves. 
By this he fixes the meaning of the original threatening, and shews what is intended 
by death or dying, when threatened as the penalty of a divine law. And that by
<i>death</i> here is meant eternal death, or endless punishment is certain, because 
he puts it in opposition to eternal life. “The wages of sin is <i>death</i>: But 
the gift of God is <i>eternal life</i>, through Jesus Christ our Lord.”<note n="166" id="iii.vii.ii-p33.4"><p class="normal" id="iii.vii.ii-p34"><scripRef id="iii.vii.ii-p34.1" passage="Rom. vi. 23" parsed="|Rom|6|23|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Rom.6.23">Rom. 
vi. 23</scripRef>.</p></note> He speaks of death in the preceding verses, as the end and consequence 
of sin, 
<pb n="229" id="iii.vii.ii-Page_229" />and puts it in opposition to life. He says, “If ye live after the 
flesh, <i>ye shall die</i>: But if ye, through the spirit, do mortify the deeds 
of the body, ye shall live.”<note n="167" id="iii.vii.ii-p34.2"><p class="normal" id="iii.vii.ii-p35"><scripRef id="iii.vii.ii-p35.1" passage="Rom. viii. 8" parsed="|Rom|8|8|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Rom.8.8">Rom. viii. 8</scripRef>.</p></note> Here he means by dying, 
perishing forever, in opposition to living forever; or endless misery, opposed to 
endless happiness. This fixes the meaning of dying, as the fruit, consequence and 
wages of sin; and is the same threatening with that under consideration, in the 
same words, <i>ye shall die</i>. If there be need of any farther confirmation of 
this point, it may be observed, that endless misery or infinite evil, the punishment 
which sin deserves, is expressly called death, or dying.<note n="168" id="iii.vii.ii-p35.2"><p class="normal" id="iii.vii.ii-p36"><scripRef id="iii.vii.ii-p36.1" passage="Rev. xxi. 8" parsed="|Rev|21|8|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Rev.21.8">Rev. xxi. 8</scripRef>.</p></note> “But the fearful and unbelieving, &amp;:c. shall have their part in the lake which burneth 
with fire and brimstone, <i>Which is the second death</i>.” What can be more certain, 
than that the first threatening to man, if he sinned, “Thou shalt surely die,” did 
express the proper penalty or wages due to sin, even endless misery, or infinite 
evil, since this is expressed often in other parts of scripture in the same language, 
and more than once in the same words? If the Bible may be allowed to explain itself, 
the matter is clearly decided.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.vii.ii-p37">Must not every one who will attend to what has now been brought 
into view on this point, be left without a doubt about the meaning of the original 
threatening, “Thou shalt surely die?” Is it not as demonstrably certain that it 
is a threatening of all the evil that sin deserves, even endless punishment, which 
is the <i>second death</i>, as any proposition in theology is, or can be?</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.vii.ii-p38">This point being established beyond all controversy, that the 
threatening made to man, if he eat of the fruit of the forbidden tree, denounced 
the evil which sin deserves; and which was equally applicable to the transgression 
of any other precept; and therefore was a threatening of infinite evil, or complete 
and endless destruction; the following inferences necessarily follow; viz.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.vii.ii-p39">I. That temporal death, or separation between soul and body, is 
not the whole or the chief of die evil contained in the threatening. This is not 
an infinite evil; but a very inconsiderable one, compared with what sin <pb n="230" id="iii.vii.ii-Page_230" />
deserves: Therefore something infinitely more dreadful must be implied in the threatening; 
even that which in scripture is called the <i>second death</i>, which is endless 
misery.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.vii.ii-p40">2. It farther follows, that separation of soul and body is <i>
no part</i> of the punishment threatened. The death threatened was quite of a different 
kind, and not only does not include, but necessarily <i>excludes</i>, separation 
of soul and body. Had the punishments taken place and been executed without any 
mitigation; or had there been no reprieve and redemption for man, this separation 
of soul and body could not have taken place: Because the punishment deserved, and 
therefore the punishment threatened was, evil to the <i>whole man</i>, or to the 
man made up of soul and body. This creature, consisting of body and soul, which 
were essential constituent parts of the man, was threatened, and if he sinned, was 
to be punished; and not one part only, while the other is taken down and annihilated. 
Therefore, this could not take place, consistent with the full execution of the 
threatening. It is not so great an evil for the mind only to suffer, as it is to 
be miserable, or to suffer evil, in body and soul: The man is capable of suffering 
unspeakable evil or pain in his body; therefore, this suffering must be included 
in the threatening. And this proves, that separation of soul and body, could not 
be the subject of a <i>threatening</i>, that is, could not be <i>threatened</i>: 
For this would not have been an evil, in that case, but a negative good, which cannot 
be the subject of a threatening, but rather of a promise; for evil only can be threatened, 
and not good, negative, or positive. Separation of body and soul would have been 
a mitigation of punishment, and would have rendered man, not capable of suffering 
so much, as in body and soul united; therefore could not be threatened as a <i>punishment</i>, 
it being no part or kind of punishment, but the contrary. And under that constitution, 
under which the threatening w as made, there was no provision for a reunion if a 
separation once took place; nor was it indeed possible there should be a reunion, 
if a separation was threatened as a punishment, and had the threatening been executed. 
Is it not hence evident to a certainty, that separation of <pb n="231" id="iii.vii.ii-Page_231" />soul and 
body could not have taken place, had man been punished for disobedience, according 
to the threatening; and therefore this was not included in the threatening, but 
on the contrary, was necessarily excluded?</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.vii.ii-p41">If any should say, as some indeed have said, that we learn what 
was intended by the threatening, by the sentence that was pronounced on man, after 
he had transgressed; which was nothing worse than temporal death: The reply will 
be. That it is a great mistake to suppose that the body of man, being doomed to 
return to the dust, and the appointment of a separation between soul and body, is 
pronouncing a sentence upon him, answerable to the threatening; as there is not 
the least evidence or appearance of this, but the contrary, in the account which 
is given of it, all taken together. When man had sinned, God appeared, and called 
him before him, and brought him to a confession of his sin. And then, instead of 
inflicting the threatened penalty upon him, he declared his design to reprieve him 
from the punishment threatened, and to exercise pardoning mercy; and promised a 
redemption, by which Satan should be defeated in his design, in tempting man to 
rebel, in the following words, to the serpent, “I will put enmity between thee and 
the woman, and between thy seed and her seed: <i>It shall bruise thy head</i>, and 
thou shalt bruise his heel.” God having thus promised relief and redemption by the 
seed of the woman, proceeds to declare what shall take place in consequence of man’s 
apostasy; and the introduction of a Saviour, viz. That the ground should be cursed 
for his sake, and bring forth thorns and thistles; so that in the sweat of his face, 
and in sorrow, he should obtain and eat his bread, till his body should return to 
the ground from whence it was taken. That is, this should be an evil, sorrowful 
world to him, and he should leave this state, and pass into the invisible world 
by a separation of soul and body, by the latter returning to its original dust.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.vii.ii-p42">This new constitution and appointment is introduced in consequence 
of the apostasy of man, and the promised redemption by Christ, wisely ordered to 
answer important ends in the new state of probation, into which man was now brought; 
and at the game time, to be a <pb n="232" id="iii.vii.ii-Page_232" />constant admonition to man, that he 
was a sinner, and had hereby incurred the displeasure of his Maker; and of his desert 
of endless destruction, and the certainty of its coming upon him, unless he be interested 
in the benefits of redemption. And it was necessary it should take place, as the 
best way in which man should pass out of this state of probation into the invisible 
state, so as to continue that state invisible, where both the redeemed, and those 
who die in their sins, are lodged and remain, until the general resurrection; when 
the body and soul shall be reunited, not to be separated again. And as this separation 
of soul and body, in which the latter becomes a ghastly, loathsome spectacle, and 
returns to corruption, and is a certain introduction to endless misery, the second 
death, to all who have no interest in the Redeemer, it is a striking visible emblem 
of endless destruction, and is connected with it to all who die ungodly; it has 
therefore obtained the name of <i>death</i>, though it be not <i>death</i> in the 
original sense of the word; eternal destruction being the only proper and real death 
of a moral agent, sinning against God: Therefore this is called the <i>second</i> 
death, after separation of soul and body had obtained the name of death, and with 
reference to that.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.vii.ii-p43">And as the body’s returning to dust, is no part of the death threatened, 
and is not the real and true death of a rational creature, it is frequently represented 
in scripture, not to be real death; but persons are represented as escaping death 
and not dying, who are the subjects of this separation of soul and body, and do 
die in this sense. Thus in the forementioned chapters of the prophecy of Ezekiel, 
it is repeatedly said, that the penitent obedient sinner, shall not die. His body 
must return to dust, as do the bodies of the wicked, yet he should not die. Therefore 
this is not death. It is not the death threatened to the wicked, nor the death which 
the righteous escape: Therefore not death in the original and most proper sense 
of the word.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.vii.ii-p44">Solomon says, “Righteousness delivereth from death. In the 
way of righteousness is life, and in the pathway thereof there is no death.” But 
the bodies of the righteous return to dust. Therefore this is not <pb n="233" id="iii.vii.ii-Page_233" />
death. Our Saviour speaks the same language, and says, “Whosoever believeth in me, 
shall never die: shall not die, but live forever.” Believing in him does not prevent 
their bodies returning to dust: Therefore this is not death; it is not the death 
threatened for sin, and is not the proper wages of it; and is not the death from 
which Christ came to deliver men; for there would have been no separation of soul 
and body, had he not undertaken to redeem man. He delivers from the <i>second death</i>, 
the only real death of a rational creature: which was therefore threatened to disobedience, 
and will take place in its full meaning after the day of judgment; of which the 
death of the body is but a shadow.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.vii.ii-p45">This leads to observe, as a farther evidence that the separation 
of soul and body is no part of the curse threatened in the divine law, that when 
this curse or threatened punishment shall be executed on those who die in their 
sins, and are not redeemed, soul and body shall be united, and they shall be miserable 
forever, both in soul and body, in union. The proper and full execution of the threatening 
does not take place, but is suspended by reason of the redemption, which brings 
man into a state of probation, until that is finished. During this time the wicked, 
who by the death of the body go out of this world into the invisible state, are 
represented in scripture, to be in prison, as criminals, waiting for the pronouncing 
and execution of the sentence against them, at the day of judgment: and then the 
threatening will be executed. We must therefore look there, to see what the curse 
of the law is, and what is meant by death when threatened as the proper punishment 
of sin; and this will assure us it is the <i>second death</i>, even that infinite 
evil included in the last sentence, “Depart, ye <i>cursed</i>, into everlasting 
fire.”</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.vii.ii-p46">Thus evident and certain it appears to be, that the law and constitution 
under which man was made, knew not of separation of soul and body, nor did admit 
of it; and that the death with which he was threatened, if he failed of perfect 
obedience to every divine command, was endless punishment, in his whole person, 
soul and body: And that this separation of soul and body was introduced and took 
place, under a new dispensation of <pb n="234" id="iii.vii.ii-Page_234" />grace by a Redeemer, as peculiar 
to that, and to answer important ends respecting it; and when that is over and completed, 
this separation shall cease, and all mankind will be united to their bodies again, 
in which the redeemed shall be happy forever; and the wicked suffer the penalty 
of the law, in everlasting misery, in soul and body united. In short, the dissolution 
of the body could not take place, unless man had sinned; nor then, if the threatening 
had been executed without remedy; and unless a new dispensation of grace had been 
introduced, and man had been reprieved, and put into a new state of probation, under 
a Redeemer. Both these must take place, the sin and rebellion of man, and redemption 
by a Mediator, in order to separation of soul and body being proper, necessary, 
or possible, consistent with the divine law. They therefore must have been greatly 
mistaken, who have thought and asserted that this was all that was threatened in 
the divine law, or as the penalty of eating of the forbidden fruit. And they have 
made as real a mistake who have supposed that turning the body to dust is included 
in the threatening, or any part of it, since the contrary is evidently true, viz. 
that the threatening necessarily excludes it.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.vii.ii-p47">3. From what has been said on this subject, it may be inferred 
with the greatest certainty, that death in the original threatening, does not mean 
annihilation, or an end to existence, as some have supposed: For this would be an 
infinitely less evil than sin deserves; which has been proved cannot be the penalty 
threatened in the divine law, because a good and perfect law must threaten a punishment 
equal to the crime in transgressing it. Besides, it has been shown that <i>death</i> 
and <i>dying</i> is never used in this sense, when it denotes the punishment or 
proper wages of sin. And the <i>second death</i>, which evidently means the death 
threatened to Adam, is expressly said to consist in positive, sensible punishment 
or pain, which is perpetual and endless, where they rest not day or night, and the 
smoke of their torment ascendeth up forever and ever.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.vii.ii-p48">4. It appears from what has been said, as well as from other considerations, 
that what is called spiritual death, a going into a course of total sinfulness and 
rebellion, is <pb n="235" id="iii.vii.ii-Page_235" />not the death threatened, when God said to man, “Thou 
shall surely die.”</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.vii.ii-p49">This is evident, in that it cannot be the evil which sin deserves, 
or the proper punishment of it. A man may be wholly a rebel and totally sinful, 
or contrary to the law of God, in all his exercises and conduct: and yet not be 
totally miserable. Of this we have evidence enough before our eyes. But rebellion 
deserves complete and endless misery, and must be therefore threatened, as has been 
proved. Besides, if going into a course of total rebellion were necessarily attended 
with complete and endless pain and misery; the punishment or the evil threatened, 
is the attendant, natural evil, pain and misery, and not the sin and rebellion itself.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.vii.ii-p50">This leads to observe, that sin and rebellion, or transgression 
of the divine law, cannot be the proper matter of a threatening, as a punishment 
of transgression, and the evil to be inflicted for it. For this is the evil or crime, 
for which punishment is threatened, and not the punishment itself. This is the crime 
threatened with a punishment, and not the punishment threatened. Moral evil, or 
sin and rebellion, is always criminal, in every instance and degree of it; and this 
deserves punishment, and this only can be punished. The punishment therefore cannot 
be sin itself, or moral evil; for to suppose this is to confound the crime and punishment, 
as one and the same thing, and to threaten a crime with the commission of a crime. 
The proper and only punishment of sin or moral evil, is natural evil, or pain and 
suffering; and this alone can be the proper matter of a threatening.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.vii.ii-p51">If sinning and rebellion be a punishment, then the first act of 
sin of which the man was guilty was a punishment, as really as any after acts; but 
this could not be a punishment, unless man was punished for his antecedent innocence: 
And therefore could not be threatened as a punishment. Besides, to threaten any 
one, that if he transgressed once, he should be left to his pleasure to go on in 
sin, and do nothing but sin, would be really no threatening, or a very improper 
one, and no more than to say, if he did sin, he should sin, and go on to do that 
which should be most agreeable to him, and so long as <pb n="236" id="iii.vii.ii-Page_236" />he should choose 
to do so, and no longer. Punishment is suffering some evil; and which is an evil 
in his sight on whom it is inflicted, and in which he is passive: Therefore man 
cannot be properly punished, by that in which he is not a patient, and really <i>
suffers</i> nothing: but is altogether active in it, and chooses it as a good, in 
itself considered; which is true of every degree of sin. Therefore, in this view 
of it, it cannot be threatened as a punishment; for it really is none, as it has 
not the nature of a punishment.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.vii.ii-p52">God is said in scripture, in several instances, to give men up 
to gratify their lusts and to strong delusion, and to walk in their own ways,<note n="169" id="iii.vii.ii-p52.1"><p class="normal" id="iii.vii.ii-p53">
<scripRef id="iii.vii.ii-p53.1" passage="Psalm lxxxi. 12" parsed="|Ps|81|12|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Ps.81.12">Psalm lxxxi. 12</scripRef>.—<scripRef passage="Rom 1:26" id="iii.vii.ii-p53.2" parsed="|Rom|1|26|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Rom.1.26">Rom. i. 26</scripRef>.—<scripRef passage="2Thes 2:11" id="iii.vii.ii-p53.3" parsed="|2Thess|2|11|0|0" osisRef="Bible:2Thess.2.11">2 
Thess. ii. 11</scripRef>.</p></note> in consequence of their having chosen to rebel 
against him. But this is not threatened as a punishment, nor said to be such; and 
for reasons just mentioned, we may be sure they are not to be considered as such, 
but only as instances of God’s just and wise conduct, to answer important ends in 
his moral government. By the sins they commit who are thus abandoned to sin, they 
are prepared for punishment, and go on to it; but they are not the punishment itself; 
this consists in the destruction, the natural evil which they suffer for the sins 
which they are suffered, and given up to commit. It is thus expressed by St. Paul; 
“For this cause God shall send them strong delusion, that they should believe a 
lie: <i>That they ail might be damned</i>, who believed not the truth; but had pleasure 
in unrighteousness.” And when he speaks of the heathen being given up by God to 
vile affections, and says that in this way, “They received in themselves that recompense 
of their error which was meet,” he is not be understood to mean, that the exercise 
of these lusts, or their sinning as they did, was the recompense or punishment for 
their former sins; but this recompense consisted in the shame and disgrace, pain 
and misery, which were the proper, meet and constituted attendants and consequence 
of their vile practices. Nor does he say that this natural evil or unhappiness, 
which in this life attended, or followed their ways of sin, was the proper and adequate 
punishment of their crimes. For he goes on to observe, that they knew, or were under 
advantages to 
<pb n="237" id="iii.vii.ii-Page_237" />know, that the sins of which they were guilty deserved <i>death</i>; 
by which is meant neither temporal nor spiritual death; but eternal destruction, 
the <i>second death</i>, the death threatened, as the proper and full punishment 
of sin, when moral government was first instituted, and man was put under law. His 
words are, “Who knowing the judgment of God, that they which commit such things 
are worthy of <i>death</i>, not only do the same, but have pleasure in them that 
do them.”<note n="170" id="iii.vii.ii-p53.4"><p class="normal" id="iii.vii.ii-p54"><scripRef id="iii.vii.ii-p54.1" passage="Romans i. 32" parsed="|Rom|1|32|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Rom.1.32">Romans i. 32</scripRef>.</p></note> He proceeds in the next chapter to speak of 
that punishment of the sinner, which he here says is <i>death</i>, according to 
the revealed, known judgment of God. We are sure that the <i>judgment of God</i> 
is according to truth, against them which commit such things. “And thinkest thou, 
O man, who doest these things, that thou shalt escape the <i>judgment of God</i>? 
But after thy hardness and impenitent heart, treasurest up wrath, against the day 
of wrath, and the revelation of the righteous judgment of God; who will render to 
every man according to his deeds. To them who by patient continuance in well doing, 
seek for glory, honour and immortality: Eternal life: But unto them that are contentious, 
and do not obey the truth, but obey unrighteousness, indignation and wrath, tribulation 
and anguish, upon every soul of man, that doth evil.” In these words he clearly, 
and in the most decisive manner, declares what that death is of which sinners are 
worthy, according to the judgment of God, and which will be inflicted on the finally 
impenitent. It consists in suffering the wrath of God, which shall be poured on 
the heads of the wicked after the day of judgment: And this indignation and wrath, 
tribulation and anguish, is set in opposition to <i>eternal life</i>, which the 
redeemed shall enjoy: therefore must be without end. This <i>death</i> therefore 
is not temporal, nor spiritual death, nor annihilation; but endless existence in 
misery, suffering that evil which is the wages of sin, and is infinitely worse than 
non-existence.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.vii.ii-p55">If all natural evil, that is, unhappiness, pain and suffering, 
could be separated from sin, and the sinner could have all the enjoyment and happiness 
he desires and seeks in the way of sin, it would be no sensible punishment, <pb n="238" id="iii.vii.ii-Page_238" />
and really no punishment at all to him; but in his view, it would be a real good, 
perfectly agreeable to his desire and choice, to be allowed to go on in sin; and 
the contrary would be the object of his greatest aversion, and the greatest evil 
to him. Therefore there can be no propriety or reason in <i>threatening</i> him, 
to give him up to walk in his own ways, and do nothing but sin. This indeed could 
not be a threatening to him, but would be considered by him as a precious promise 
of good.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.vii.ii-p56">It will perhaps be said, that though living in sin be not an evil 
in the view of the sinner, but a desirable good; yet to innocent man, and in the 
perfect exercise of holiness, to whom this threatening was pronounced if he transgressed, 
sin appeared to be the greatest evil; and therefore nothing worse to him could be 
threatened, than spiritual death, which consists wholly in sin.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.vii.ii-p57">Upon this it may be observed, that we cannot reasonably infer 
from this, that spiritual death or sinning was threatened as the punishment of sin; 
because, for the reasons that have been given, there is an impropriety in such a 
threatening, as it is only threatening that if he did sin, he should continue to 
sin if he chose it, and be left wholly at liberty to do as he pleased. And this 
is really no threatening, for it is no punishment to do and to have what we choose. 
But this is all that would be threatened in this case, that if he once chose to 
sin, he should be suffered to sin hereafter, without being counteracted or interrupted. 
Besides, the <i>first sin</i> was as great an evil to innocent, holy man, as any
<i>after sin</i>, and the most dreadful, as it was connected with all after sin, 
and introduced it. There is the same reason, therefore, why the first transgression 
should be considered, and threatened as a punishment, which is given, that any after 
sin should be so considered, and threatened. It will be said, this could not be, 
as it was improper and impossible. But it may be said with as much reason, that 
it was improper and really impossible to threaten any after sin, or any degree of 
it, as a punishment of the first sin, which appears from what has been said.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.vii.ii-p58">When the apostle Paul says, “sin revived, <i>and I died</i>,” 
he does not mean what is called a <i>spiritual death</i>, <pb n="239" id="iii.vii.ii-Page_239" />for this 
consists in sin, or is sin itself: But Paul distinguishes the death he died from 
sin, and speaks of it as the <i>effect</i> of sin. Sin by the law <i>slew him</i>; 
and sin <i>wrought</i> and produced death, <i>i.e</i>. brought him under the curse 
of the law. He died, that is, found himself dead, being under the threatening and 
curse of that law which was given to Adam, and denounced death upon the transgressor, 
even eternal destruction. Is not the death originally threatened, clearly stated 
by this apostle?</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.vii.ii-p59">It is granted that in a few passages of scripture, those who are 
wholly inclined to sin, and so under the dominion of sin, are said to be dead; and 
the word <i>death</i> is perhaps sometimes used to denote such a state. But when 
these words are used in this sense, they are evidently used not to express the punishment 
of sin; and have no reference to the original threatening, or any thing of that 
kind. To be dead, in this sense, is always mentioned as a crime, and not as a punishment 
of any crime.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.vii.ii-p60">5. On the whole, it appears from what has been said on this question, 
respecting the death threatened to the disobedience of man, that it means a being 
separated from all natural good and happiness, unto all natural evil or misery; 
continuing in endless, miserable existence, suffering the just punishment of sin 
against God. This is to <i>die</i> in the highest and most proper sense; and is 
the only death with which a rational moral agent can be threatened or punished, 
so as fully and properly to express the true desert of sin, and answer the ends 
of moral government.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.vii.ii-p61">This is the original and proper meaning of the word death, and 
of dying, and no other idea was affixed to it, when the threatening was denounced 
to man; and he was doubtless made to understand it, when the law was made known 
to him, if he needed any particular instruction, in order to know the meaning of 
the threatening. And when the separation of soul and body, which took place after 
man had sinned, and was restored to a new state of probation, was called <i>death</i>, 
to distinguish the death here threatened from that, it is called the <i>second death</i>, 
which is suspended, and will not take place till <pb n="240" id="iii.vii.ii-Page_240" />
redemption is finished, and soul and body are restored to their original union, 
by the general resurrection.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.vii.ii-p62">Having inquired and found what was the penalty threatened to the 
transgressor of the law, under which man was made; it is now to be considered, whether 
any promise of reward was given to him, if he continued perfectly obedient.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.vii.ii-p63">What has been said to prove that the angels had a time of trial 
of their obedience, and a promise of eternal life, if they continued obedient through 
the time of trial,<note n="171" id="iii.vii.ii-p63.1"><p class="normal" id="iii.vii.ii-p64">Page 211, 212, 213.</p></note> 
is equally applicable to man, and as full a proof that the latter was not only secure 
in happiness and the favour of God, so long as he continued obedient; but had a 
time of trial appointed him, with a promise that upon his persevering in obedience 
to the end of that time, he should be confirmed in holiness and the favour of God. 
But there is a particular and decisive evidence of this, with respect to man, which 
we have not in the instance of the angels. This is, the <i>tree of life</i>, which 
was planted in the midst of the garden, and what is said of it. The name of this 
tree is significant, and points out the design and use of it. It was called the
<i>tree of life</i>, because by partaking of the fruit of it, man was to have eternal 
life confirmed to him, of which this was the appointed pledge or seal. This is made 
certain by what is said respecting it, after man had transgressed, viz. that man 
was not suffered to continue in the garden, but was driven out of it, “lest he should 
put forth his hand, and take also of the tree of life, and eat, and <i>live forever</i>.” 
This cannot be understood, without supposing that the fruit of this tree, and man’s 
partaking of it, was the appointed sign and pledge of eternal life, or the seal 
of a promise that he should live forever. Man having sinned, and forfeited the promise, 
it was not proper that he should partake of this constituted pledge of eternal life, 
or continue in a situation, in which there was a possibility of his eating of this 
fruit. Agreeable to this, and with allusion to it, Christ says, “To him that overcometh 
will I give to eat of the tree of life which is in the midst of the paradise of 
God,” which is a promise <pb n="241" id="iii.vii.ii-Page_241" />of eternal life.<note n="172" id="iii.vii.ii-p64.1"><p class="normal" id="iii.vii.ii-p65"><scripRef id="iii.vii.ii-p65.1" passage="Rev. ii. 7" parsed="|Rev|2|7|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Rev.2.7">Rev. ii. 7</scripRef>.</p></note> 
This is still farther confirmed by what St. Paul says of the law given to man, in 
his primitive state, viz. that it was <i>ordained unto life</i>.<note n="173" id="iii.vii.ii-p65.2"><p class="normal" id="iii.vii.ii-p66"><scripRef id="iii.vii.ii-p66.1" passage="Rom. vii. 10" parsed="|Rom|7|10|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Rom.7.10">Rom. vii. 
10</scripRef>.</p></note> And that he that doeth the things required in it, <i>shall live by them</i>.<note n="174" id="iii.vii.ii-p66.2"><p class="normal" id="iii.vii.ii-p67"><scripRef passage="Rom 10:5" id="iii.vii.ii-p67.1" parsed="|Rom|10|5|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Rom.10.5">
Chap. x. 5</scripRef>.—<scripRef passage="Gal 3:12" id="iii.vii.ii-p67.2" parsed="|Gal|3|12|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Gal.3.12">Gal. iii. 12</scripRef>.</p></note> 
This must refer to the original law given to man when innocent, or before he sinned; 
for no such law could be ordained to life, or propose and promise life on this condition, 
since sin took place, it being impossible that man, since the first apostasy, should 
obtain life in this way. This the apostle observes in the passages just quoted. 
“The commandment, which was ordained unto life, <i>I found to be unto death</i>. 
For as many as are of the works of the law, are under the curse: For it is written, 
cursed is every one that continueth not in all the things written in the book of 
the law to do them.” Therefore the law given to man in his primitive state, which 
threatened <i>death</i> to the transgressor, and cursed him, promised eternal life 
to him upon perfect obedience. And as he sinned, and so failed of obtaining this 
life by obedience, the death and curse threatened to disobedience is come upon him.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.vii.ii-p68">We are not expressly told how long man was to continue in obedience, 
before he might eat of the tree of life, and have eternal life made sure to him: 
Nor why he might not, and did not, eat of the fruit of the tree directly, and put 
an end to his probation state, and have eternal life sealed to him. But we may be 
certain there was some wise appointment and regulation concerning this. And perhaps 
we are not left to mere conjecture about it. Is it not very probable, if not beyond 
a doubt, that this tree of life had no fruit on it, when this transaction took place, 
and the promise was made; or the fruit had not come to maturity, so as to be eaten: 
And that man was told, that if he continued obedient till ripe fruit was on that 
tree he should then eat of it, as a token and pledge of eternal life, being made 
sure to him? This fixed the time of his probation, in the wisest and best manner. 
Man could not tell the hour nor day in which he might eat of this tree, and be confirmed; 
but he <pb n="242" id="iii.vii.ii-Page_242" />
might see the fruit growing, and ripening every day, which would be a constant and 
growing motive and encouragement to perseverance. Man sinned before the fruit of 
this tree was produced and ripe; and therefore was not allowed to live where it 
might be possible for him to take and eat of it, when there should be ripe fruit 
on this tree.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.vii.ii-p69">Thus it appears that the law, or moral constitution under which 
man was placed, was of the nature of a cove7iant between his Creator and him; man’s 
duty, or what God required of him, was stated, and the penalty of failing of his 
duty was fixed by the law with a promise of eternal life, on condition of his obedience 
through the time of trial, which was appointed. And man consented to this law and 
constitution, as good and excellent, and stood engaged to perform the condition, 
on which he should obtain the promised reward. This he must be supposed to do: for 
not to do it, when it was revealed to him by God, would be rebellion against his 
sovereign.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.vii.ii-p70">It has been observed, that the moral law, which is essential to 
moral government, and by which man was bound as soon as he existed a moral agent, 
is epitomised by Christ, who says it requires nothing but love, to love God with 
all our heart, and our neighbour as ourselves. It hence appears, as well as from 
the reason of the case, that this law respects the heart, or wall and affections. 
It is with the <i>heart</i>, in the exercise of perfect <i>love</i>, that this law 
is obeyed; and the smallest contrariety to this love, in the exercises of the heart, 
or the least defect in the degree and strength of it, is a violation of this law, 
and must bring the curse or penalty on the transgressor. If there be no degree of 
exercise of love in the heart, there is no obedience to this law: and where this 
love is exercised constantly in a perfect manner and degree, or without any defect, 
there is perfect obedience. This docs indeed necessarily imply, that this love is 
expressed in all proper ways, in <i>external conduct</i>, so far as it is in the 
power, and under the government of the will; but the obedience consists wholly in 
the exercises of the heart or will, producing what is external, in proper expressions 
of love. And where there is no love <pb n="243" id="iii.vii.ii-Page_243" />exercised in the heart, there 
is no real obedience or holiness, whatever be the external appearance, in words 
or conduct. The resolving the whole law into <i>love</i> by Christ, and St. Paul’s 
saying that <i>love is the fulfilling of the law</i>, and that without <i>love</i> 
he was nothing, whatever were his external conduct, sufficiently establish this 
point, if it were not capable of demonstration from the reason and nature of things.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.vii.ii-p71">This law being founded in reason, and as perfect and excellent 
as is the moral government of an infinitely wise and good Being, must be, in its 
own nature, unchangeable; so that it cannot be abrogated or set aside, or abated; 
nor can any moral agent be released from obligation to obey it constantly and perfectly. 
There may be particular positive precepts given on special occasions, and with reference 
to particular circumstances; which may not be always binding, but may be temporary, 
and cease to be in force, when the end of them is answered, and the reason of their 
being given ceases. The law requiring love to God and to our neighbour will oblige 
man to obey all such positive temporary commands, while the reason of these injunctions 
continues; but when the reason of them ceases, they become obsolete, and the obligation 
to obey them is at an end. Many of the laws given to Israel by Moses are instances 
and an illustration of this. But the law requiring <i>love</i> is reasonable and 
binding on all, at all times, and cannot cease or be made void in any degree. The 
least disregard paid to it, even in thought or heart by a moral agent, for one moment, 
in any circumstances, must be wrong and criminal. And it would be infinitely wrong, 
were it possible, as it is not, for the Legislator and Governor of the world, to 
express or show any disregard to this law, and not to support and maintain it at 
all times, and in every respect, by all his authority.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.vii.ii-p72">Therefore the penalty of it must always be regarded as reasonable, 
important and sacred, it being an essential part of the law, and necessary in order 
to guard, support and enforce it, and clothe it with the authority of the supreme 
Legislator. A disposition not to execute the threatening, or to mitigate the punishment; 
and consequently the manifestation of such a disposition would be <pb n="244" id="iii.vii.ii-Page_244" />
infinitely unreasonable and wrong, as it would be dishonourable to a most reasonable 
and righteous law, worthy to be maintained and honoured; and which must be regarded 
and supported, in order to exercise moral government in the best manner. In the 
most perfect and excellent government, the penalty of the law must be as much regarded 
and supported as the precept; because to disregard, abate, or set aside the former, 
is equally shewing disrespect to the latter, and really repealing it. A proper regard 
cannot be shewn to the penalty, without manifesting a disposition and determination 
to punish agreeable to the threatening, by inflicting infinite evil for transgression, 
and actually punishing so as to answer all the ends of the penalty, and fully support 
the threatening.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.vii.ii-p73">Jn what particular way and manner this law was communicated to 
man, with all the positive precepts which were given to him, we are not informed. 
It appears that God conversed familiarly with him; but whether he put on a bodily 
shape, and appeared like a man, or what was the appearance, or the way in which 
he communicated to Adam the commands and instructions which he revealed, cannot 
be certainly determined. However, we are certain this was done in the most wise 
and proper way; and so as that man had clear and decisive evidence that his Maker 
did converse with him, and understood all that was said or revealed to him, respecting 
the moral government under which he was placed, the covenant made with him, and 
the state of probation, into which he was put, and when it should be ended, &amp;c.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.vii.ii-p74">Adam, when he first came into existence, though in a state of 
manhood and maturity, as to his faculties of body and mind, stood in need of instruction, 
and doubtless had the knowledge of many things communicated to him by immediate 
inspiration, or otherways from his Maker, as he could have no other instructor. 
Among these the knowledge of language was one; and how to communicate ideas by words. 
He was not left to learn this art, and form a language without help, but had the 
immediate assistance of God.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.vii.ii-p75">In this transaction between God the Creator and Governor, and 
man the creature, in which the law, <pb n="245" id="iii.vii.ii-Page_245" />with the promises and threatenings 
of it, was declared and established in the form of a covenant between God and man, 
Adam was considered and treated as comprehending all mankind. He being, by divine 
constitution, the natural head and father of the whole race, they were all included 
and created in him, as one whole, which could not be separated: And therefore he 
is treated as the whole in this transaction. The covenant made with him was made 
with all mankind, and he was constituted the public and confederating head of the 
whole race of men, and acted in this capacity, as being the whole; and his obedience 
was considered as the obedience of mankind; and as by this, Adam was to obtain eternal 
life, had he performed it, this comprehended and insured the eternal life of all 
his posterity. And, on the contrary, his disobedience was the disobedience of the 
whole of all mankind; and the threatened penalty did not respect Adam personally, 
or as a single individual; but his whole posterity, included in him, and represented 
by him. Therefore the transgression, being the transgression of the whole, brought 
the threatened punishment on all mankind.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.vii.ii-p76">This point will be more particularly considered, explained and 
proved in a following chapter; but it seems proper to bring it into view in this 
place, in order to give a clear and full representation of the law and moral government, 
under which man was originally placed. That Adam was considered and treated in this 
respect, as being, or comprehending all mankind, is evident, in that almost every 
thing which is said to him, in the three first chapters of Genesis, has respect 
to the whole race of mankind, and not to Adam personally; and is spoken to them, 
or of them. The first time <span class="sc" id="iii.vii.ii-p76.1">man</span> is mentioned, it evidently 
means mankind, and not any particular man.<note n="175" id="iii.vii.ii-p76.2"><p class="normal" id="iii.vii.ii-p77"><scripRef id="iii.vii.ii-p77.1" passage="Gen. i. 26" parsed="|Gen|1|26|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Gen.1.26">Gen. i. 26</scripRef>.</p></note> 
“And God said. Let us make <i>man</i>, and let <span class="sc" id="iii.vii.ii-p77.2">them</span> have 
dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the air, and over the cattle,
<i>and over all the earth</i>, and over every creeping thing that creepeth upon 
the earth.” By <i>man</i> here must be meant mankind, which is denoted by the following 
words, “And let <i>them</i> have dominion over <i>the whole earth</i>,” that is, 
mankind; the whole human <pb n="246" id="iii.vii.ii-Page_246" />
race. All mankind were created, in creating the first man; for they were all included 
in him, and to be propagated from him, and arise and grow out of him, as the branches 
of a tree are included in the original stock, root or seed. God in creating the 
first herbs and trees, with the seed in themselves to propagate their kind, really 
created all the herbs and trees which shall exist to the end of the world. So he 
created all mankind, in creating the first man; and in giving dominion to him, he 
gave dominion to all. They were all made like him, in kind, and their state, condition 
and circumstances were fixed, as much as that of the race of plants and trees. All 
mankind were created in the image of God, and to <i>them</i> was given dominion 
over all the earth. “And God blessed <i>them</i>, and God said unto <i>them</i>, 
Be fruitful, and multiply, and fill the earth, and subdue it.” This blessing and 
this command respected mankind, and not the first man personally, in distinction 
from the rest; for he alone was not to fill the earth, and subdue it, but the human 
race. God is therefore represented as blessing <span class="sc" id="iii.vii.ii-p77.3">them</span> all, 
and speaking to them all, and not to a single person. It hence appears, that the 
posterity of Adam were so connected with him, and included in him, that they might 
properly be considered as <span class="sc" id="iii.vii.ii-p77.4">one</span>; and that he was so far the 
head, and representing father of the whole, that in creating him all mankind were 
created, and in blessing him, all were blessed; and what was said to him, and done 
for him, was said to, and done for the human race; that the law given, and covenant 
made with him, with the blessing and the curse, the promise and the threatening, 
was given to all, and made with all, having respect to all mankind, included in 
their father and head: And what he did as a moral agent, was done for them, as much 
as himself; so that they, even the whole human race, must share equally with him 
an his obedience, and the promised, consequent blessing, or in his disobedience, 
and the curse. But the evidence and certainty of this, is more fully established, 
by what took place, and has been revealed since the apostasy of man. What God said 
to Adam after he had sinned, was said to, and of all mankind; and the calamity or 
evil to which he was doomed <pb n="247" id="iii.vii.ii-Page_247" />in this world, as the consequence of his 
transgression, equally falls upon his posterity. “And unto Adam he said, Because 
thou hast eaten, &amp;c. Cursed is the ground for thy sake; in sorrow shalt thou eat 
of it all the days of thy life. In the sweat of thy face shalt thou eat bread, till 
thou return unto the ground: For out of it was thou taken: for dust thou art, and 
unto dust shalt thou return.” As this sentence, “Unto dust shalt <i>thou</i> return,” 
did not respect Adam only, but all his posterity, we are naturally, if not necessarily 
led to understand the same language in the threatening, as having respect to all 
mankind, “In the day thou eatest thereof <i>thou</i> shalt surely die.” But this 
is reduced to a certainty by St. Paul.<note n="176" id="iii.vii.ii-p77.5"><p class="normal" id="iii.vii.ii-p78"><scripRef id="iii.vii.ii-p78.1" passage="Rom. v. 12" parsed="|Rom|5|12|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Rom.5.12">Rom. v. 12</scripRef>.</p></note> “Wherefore, as by 
one man sin entered into the world, and death by sin; and so death passed upon all 
men, for that all have sinned. Through the offence of one, many are dead. By the 
offence of one, judgment came upon all men to condemnation. By one man’s disobedience 
many were made sinners.” Here Adam is asserted, in the most plain and strongest 
terms, to be constituted the public covenanting head of mankind, so that sin, condemnation 
and death, came upon all his posterity, by his disobedience. The threatening, therefore, 
respected all mankind, and consequently the promises did also. And all depended 
on Adam’s conduct, to determine whether his posterity should be holy and happy forever, 
or sinners and miserable.—But this subject will be more particularly considered 
in the next chapter.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.vii.ii-p79">This covenant or constitution, in which Adam was considered and 
treated, as the father and public head of his future posterity, was more than <i>
mere law</i>: and in this respect different from the covenant made with the angels. 
It is supposed they acted every one for himself, and that they all existed at once, 
and there was no such peculiar union between them, like that between the first man 
and his posterity, which rendered such a constitution with respect to the latter, 
proper and wise; yea, necessary, in order to the exercise of the most perfect and 
excellent moral government.</p>
<pb n="248" id="iii.vii.ii-Page_248" />
<p class="normal" id="iii.vii.ii-p80">Should any object to this, and say, that as the posterity of Adam 
had no opportunity to consent to this constitution, it was not consistent with wisdom 
or righteousness to include them in it, and fix it for them. And as it was not the 
best and most likely way for them to obtain eternal happiness, by making it depend 
on the conduct of the first man, it was not consistent with goodness, and really 
unjust, and injurious to mankind. In answer to this, it must be observed,</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.vii.ii-p81">1. The creature has no right to object to any law or constitution 
which God sees fit to make respecting him; but is obliged to acquiesce in what he 
orders. God has a right to prescribe the particular method in which he will govern 
his creatures, and this belongs to him; and for a creature not to approve and consent 
to what God prescribes, is rebellion against his Maker. Therefore there was no need 
to wait, to see if Adam’s posterity would approve of such a constitution, before 
it could be with justice and propriety fixed for them. This therefore cannot be 
the ground of a reasonable objection. Indeed, if it can be proved to be an unjust, 
or unwise constitution, we may be sure no such constitution was ever made by the 
Governor of man. This brings to observe,</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.vii.ii-p82">2. Such a constitution does not appear, and cannot be proved not 
to be just and good. There was as great a prospect and probability, that the first 
man would not sin, but persevere in obedience, as that any one of his posterity 
would; yea, much greater, seeing he was created an adult, in the full exercise of 
all his rational faculties: whereas they must come into existence infants, and gradually 
rise to manhood, through the weak state of childhood and youth, in which they would 
be more exposed to fall by temptation. And the father of mankind had a strong motive 
to obedience, which none can have who only act for themselves, as the interest of 
all his posterity was put into his hands, and he acted for them all. Before the 
consequence was known, had any one, capable of viewing all circumstances, been to 
judge, he would doubtless have concluded that such a constitution was the most eligible, 
and the best that could be formed for mankind, and most likely to secure <pb n="249" id="iii.vii.ii-Page_249" />
their holiness and happiness. Now the event has proved to be evil, and by this constitution, 
Adam and his posterity are fallen into a state of ruin, we may view it as bad, and 
injurious to us; especially since we are become prejudiced against the dictates 
of wisdom, and enemies to the wise and good government of Jehovah. But this is not 
the least evidence that it is not wise and good. Mankind, while in a state of rebellion, 
are disposed to think and say, “The ways of the Lord are not equal.” And they will 
find fault with any constitution, which infinite wisdom and goodness can form. Witness 
their disapprobation of the gospel, and opposition to it. It ill becomes those who 
choose to live in sin, and when they have the offer of pardon, and deliverance from 
sin, and of eternal life, will not accept of it, but spurn it from them, to find 
fault and complain that they were originally placed under a constitution, by which 
they are fallen into that sin and ruin, from which they cannot be persuaded to accept 
deliverance, but choose to live in sin, as a privilege, and constantly approve of 
the original transgression, by obstinately persisting in that rebellion, which their 
first father began, when he sinned.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.vii.ii-p83">3. It must be observed, that if it could be proved, as it cannot, 
that such a constitution was not the most favourable to every individual, it will 
not follow that it is not, on the whole, the wisest and best constitution that could 
be formed. If no injustice be done to any one by it, and it be best suited to answer 
the most wise and important ends, it is certainly the best possible constitution. 
If it were evident that mankind did not enjoy so great advantages to be holy and 
happy forever, under such a constitution as they would have under some other, it 
does not follow that any injustice is done to them; for they had no right to these 
advantages; and God was not obliged to grant them: If he were, there could be no 
state of trial, and eternal life must be made sure to them all, which God was able 
to do. But this would not be wise, it would not have been suited to answer the most 
important ends, and for the greatest general good. Therefore if this constitution 
is suited to answer these ends, and is the best that could be for the <pb n="250" id="iii.vii.ii-Page_250" />
general good, then it is the wisest and best that could be devised. There is certainly 
no evidence that it is not so: But abundant evidence of the contrary, which may 
more fully appear by what is farther to be said on the subject, in attending to 
the consequences of this constitution, or the ends actually answered by it.</p>
<h2 id="iii.vii.ii-p83.1">IMPROVEMENT,</h2>
<p class="normal" id="iii.vii.ii-p84">I. From what has been brought into view in this chapter, we are 
led farther to reflect on the <i>goodness of God</i>, and our obligation to gratitude. 
The goodness of God appears in his forming angels with such high and noble capacities, 
and under advantages to be proportionably happy, in the exercise of their powers, 
under the good and excellent moral government, under which they were placed. God’s 
goodness appears in the moral constitution formed for angels, which was, as has 
been observed, more favourable than mere law, as they had the promise of a reward 
of eternal life, inconsequence of their obedience during a temporary trial. The 
infinite goodness and munificence of God is expressed in this, and will be forever 
celebrated by them, who are confirmed in holiness, and have actually received this 
reward. And herein is to be seen the goodness of God towards them who fell into 
sin and endless ruin. Their rebellion, and their being treated according to their 
desert, and falling under the threatened punishment, did not render the goodness 
of God to them in their original formation, and in placing them under so good a 
constitution, in any respect or degree the less; but was and continues to be as 
great and perspicuous, as it would be if they had continued in this goodness, and 
had obtained eternal life. And were their hearts right, as they ought to be, they 
would never cease to exercise gratitude, and be thankful for the goodness of God 
to them, and to acknowledge that the infinite evil which is come upon them, is the 
just consequence of their abuse of God’s goodness to them.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.vii.ii-p85">And the goodness of God to man was great and wonderful, in forming 
him with a capacity to be a moral agent, and under moral government, and to enjoy 
endless <pb n="251" id="iii.vii.ii-Page_251" />life in the favour of God. And the constitution and form of 
moral government, which has been considered, was an expression of infinite goodness; 
and could not have been formed by any being, but one infinitely good. The law requires 
nothing but what is necessary for the good of man: The highest happiness consisted 
in obedience to this law. The time of trial was to be short; and man was under every 
desirable advantage, and had every conceivable motive to persevere in obedience. 
The reward promised was infinitely great, infinitely more than the longest obedience 
could merit or deserve. And the sanction or penalty threatened was necessary in 
order to its being a good law, and was an instance of goodness, as it was a guard 
to the law, and tended to secure obedience, as it rendered disobedience infinitely 
dreadful, in the consequence of it; and so was an unspeakably powerful motive to 
obedience.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.vii.ii-p86">The appointment of a public head, and Adam, to act for the whole, 
as he was, in a sense the whole of mankind, they being all included in him, was 
a wise and good constitution; even the best, and the most in favour of mankind of 
any that can be conceived: Unspeakably more favourable to man, than if every one 
of the human race were to act for himself, and be in a state of trial, as they should 
successively rise into existence. There was a possibility that Adam would transgress; 
it was highly probable he would not. And, as has been observed, he had every desirable 
and possible motive to obedience, and a very powerful one which could not have existed, 
had he not acted as a public head, for all his posterity.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.vii.ii-p87">All this, as has been observed, was in our favour, and goodness 
to us. This is the happy state in which mankind were placed under moral government; 
the best, the happiest situation which could be devised by infinite wisdom and goodness. 
And it may be demanded. What could have been done, that was not done for mankind, 
in placing them in such circumstances, and under such a good law and constitution, 
consistent with being placed in a state of probation?</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.vii.ii-p88">The goodness of God ought to be celebrated by us, and to excite 
our constant, fervent gratitude and praise. <pb n="252" id="iii.vii.ii-Page_252" />For, as has been before 
observed, this goodness is not the less, nor are our obligations to gratitude and 
praise in the least diminished by the abuse of it; by which we have lost all the 
benefit of it, and are become most miserable.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.vii.ii-p89">II. The sin and eternal ruin of the angels who fell, is suited 
to give conviction to all, of the vanity, weakness and insufficiency of the highest 
and most excellent creatures; and of their absolute and constant dependance on God: 
And consequently, that there is no creature, in whom we may safely put any trust, 
however great and dignified.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.vii.ii-p90">This event taught the angels who did not sin this lesson more 
fully, than otherwise they could have learned it. In this they saw their own insufficiency 
for themselves; that they were liable to ruin themselves every moment, and depended 
on God entirely for preservation from infinite evil; and that they were wholly indebted 
to him for this favour, which must be sovereign goodness, to which they had no claim, 
and which God was under no obligation to grant. This they will see more clearly, 
and acknowledge with greater sensibility forever, than they could have done, if 
none of them had sinned, and fallen into endless ruin: And by it God will be more 
loved, praised and glorified, and they will be unspeakably more holy and happy, 
throughout their endless existence.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.vii.ii-p91">God, in his wisdom, ordered it so, that the highest, and most 
excellent part of the creation, should become morally corrupt, and infinitely worse 
than nothing, by sinking into irrecoverable and endless ruin and misery, to shew, 
that the creature, in its best state, is nothing but vanity, considered in itself, 
independent of the power, goodness and all-sufficiency of God; which could not be 
discovered to creatures, to the best advantage, in any other way. Which discovery 
is of the utmost importance, and absolutely necessary to the highest good of the 
universe. This will remain an everlasting lesson, by which all holy creatures will 
be taught humility and gratitude; and God will receive a revenue of praise and glory 
forever, which could not have existed, had not this event taken place.</p>
<pb n="253" id="iii.vii.ii-Page_253" />
<p class="normal" id="iii.vii.ii-p92">III. By the view we have had of the divine law and moral government, 
we may learn, what is the rule of our duty now, and consequently, what is sin in 
us, viz. every deviation of heart from the rule of duty, by omission of what it 
requires, or doing what it forbids.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.vii.ii-p93">The particular covenant made with man in his original state; by 
which the head and father of the human race was considered as including all mankind, 
and was constituted to act for the whole, being violated, ceased to exist any longer, 
except in the consequences of the violation of it. But the law pointing out and 
requiring duty, and threatening the transgressor, is still the rule of our duty, 
and binding on us; and in the threatening we are told what every transgression of 
ours deserves; and learn what is the curse under which we are, as sinners. For this 
law, as has been shown, is unchangeable in its nature, and must be binding on every 
moral agent. Transgressing it, though ever so often repeated, does not in the least 
absolve us from obligation to obey it; and however great is our aversion from what 
it requires, and however strong and fixed it be, this does not in the least excuse 
us in our disobedience, and remove or abate our obligation to obedience; bat the 
stronger and more fixed our hearts are in opposition to what is required, and the 
more and longer such opposition is indulged, the more criminal we are. There is 
no other law given to us, which requires less than this original law, or that is 
not virtually contained in it or enforced by it. To love God with all our heart, 
soul, strength and mind, and our neighbour as ourselves, is always our duty; and 
all opposition to it, and every omission of this duty, in the least degree, is sin. 
We must therefore look into this perfect law and rule of duty, and no where else, 
in order to know what is our duty, and what is sin; and by this alone can we obtain 
the knowledge of, and ascertain our own moral character.</p>
<pb n="254" id="iii.vii.ii-Page_254" />

</div3></div2>

<div2 title="Chap. VIII. On the Apostasy of Man, and the Evil Consequence to Him." prev="iii.vii.ii" next="iv" id="iii.viii">

<h2 id="iii.viii-p0.1">CHAP. VIII.</h2>
<h3 id="iii.viii-p0.2">ON THE APOSTASY OF MAN, AND THE EVIL CONSEQUENCE TO HIM.</h3>
<p class="normal" id="iii.viii-p1">MAN, who was placed in a happy and honourable situation, did not 
continue in it; but by transgressing the divine command, and violating the holy 
covenant, plunged into a state of infinite guilt and wretchedness, under the curse 
and threatened penalty of the law of God.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.viii-p2">Moses gives a particular history of this first apostasy of man, 
in the third chapter of the book of Genesis. He does not tell us how long man continued 
innocent and obedient, after he was created; or give us a history of what passed, 
and of all the particular events and transactions which took place in a state of 
innocency; such a history being of no use and importance to us, while we continue 
in the present state. The whole will doubtless be revealed to all mankind at the 
day of judgment.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.viii-p3">The <span class="sc" id="iii.viii-p3.1">Serpent</span> is said to be the tempter, 
by whom Eve was deceived, and led to eat of the fruit of the forbidden tree; and 
then gave it to Adam, and he eat of it also. It is said, “The serpent was more subtle 
than any beast of the field which the Lord God had made.” He appeared to have more 
sagacity than any other of the brute creation. Probably he had an erect and very 
beautiful form, and had nothing of the appearance and form of serpents since the 
fall of man. He appeared near the forbidden tree, or on it; perhaps eating of the 
fruit of it. It seems probable that Eve, seeing him there, and eating of the fruit 
of the tree, was surprised; upon which the serpent spoke, “Hath God said, ye shall 
not eat of every tree of the garden?” Eve replied, that God had given them full 
liberty to eat of every tree in the garden, except that one; but had forbidden them 
to touch that, upon the severest penalty. The serpent said, “Ye shall not surely 
die. For God doth know, that in the day ye eat thereof, then your eyes shall be 
opened; and ye shall be as gods, knowing good <pb n="255" id="iii.viii-Page_255" />and evil.” It is most 
probable that the serpent told the woman that by eating of the fruit of that tree, 
he had obtained the use of reason, and the faculty of speech, which she saw him 
now to exercise; and therefore said, that from his own experience, he could assure 
her, that if she would eat of this fruit, she should be so far from dying, that 
she should arrive to a much higher degree of perfection and knowledge. The first 
motion in her mind disposing her to regard and believe the serpent, rather than 
God, who had said, she should surely die, if she eat of that tree, was wrong and 
sinful: so that she really fell from her innocence, before she actually took of 
the fruit, and ate. Her doing the latter was completing her apostasy, by a full 
exertion of her will in open rebellion. And the first motion of Adam’s heart, which 
implied the least degree of inclination to hearken to the woman, and eat of the 
forbidden fruit, was a sinful one; and he was a rebel in heart, before he actually 
ate.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.viii-p4">Nothing is spoken of as the tempter but the <i>serpent</i>; because 
nothing else was visible but the serpent speaking and reasoning; or rather deceiving 
and lying. But the story itself, when properly considered, will necessarily lead 
us to conceive of some superior, invisible agent, speaking and acting in and by 
the serpent, making him the instrument, by which he effected his design. And as 
it could not be a good spirit, which by the serpent acted this part, it must be 
an evil one; which is confirmed by what God said to the serpent, after the apostasy 
of man, which will be considered more particularly in its place. But this is reduced 
to a certainty in succeeding divine revelation, where the devil and his angels are 
brought into view: And Christ evidently alludes to this instance of ruining mankind 
by deceit and lying when he says, “The devil was <i>a murderer from the beginning; 
and</i> he is <i>a liar, and the father of it</i>.” And the devil is repeatedly 
called the dragon, and <i>the serpent</i>, “That <i>old serpent</i> called the devil, 
and satan which deceiveth the whole world,” plainly alluding to the serpent which 
in the beginning deceived and seduced our first parents.<note n="177" id="iii.viii-p4.1"><p class="normal" id="iii.viii-p5"><scripRef id="iii.viii-p5.1" passage="Rev. xii. 9" parsed="|Rev|12|9|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Rev.12.9">Rev. xii. 9</scripRef>, <scripRef passage="Rev 12:14" id="iii.viii-p5.2" parsed="|Rev|12|14|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Rev.12.14">14</scripRef>, 
<scripRef passage="Rev 12:15" id="iii.viii-p5.3" parsed="|Rev|12|15|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Rev.12.15">15</scripRef>.—<scripRef passage="Rev 20:2" id="iii.viii-p5.4" parsed="|Rev|20|2|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Rev.20.2">xx. 2</scripRef>.</p></note> The devil, in order to 
carry on his <pb n="256" id="iii.viii-Page_256" />design, made use of the serpent as his instrument, he 
being a creature best suited to answer his purpose. And God saw fit to suffer him 
to do it.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.viii-p6">By this act of disobedience, our first parents violated the covenant 
which God had made with them, and forfeited all the good promised to obedience, 
and brought upon themselves the penalty threatened. It was not, indeed, completely 
executed upon them immediately. They fell under the divine displeasure and wrath, 
which was sufficiently great to destroy them forever; and which, if fully executed 
on them, must make them miserable, without end. They were condemned, and fell into 
a state of complete eternal ruin, being totally and forever undone and lost, without 
any help or hope. Thus they <i>died</i> immediately on sinning: Though the full 
execution of the punishment did not take place immediately; yet as they were condemned 
and cursed, and utterly undone, and had nothing in their reach or view to prevent 
infinite evil coming upon them, the evil threatened in a true sense fell upon them, 
and they died in the day on which they transgressed. The sentence of death, and 
the penalty threatened in the law under which the angels were, fell upon those who 
sinned immediately; but it will not be completely executed till the day of judgment; 
nor will it ever be, because it is <i>endless</i> punishment, to which they are 
condemned. It will be in execution without end, and so, strictly speaking, will 
never be fully executed: And yet the execution is according to the threatening. 
So it is in the case of man; he fell under the threatening immediately on his sinning, 
though the full and complete execution of it, do not take place for many ages.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.viii-p7">St. Paul says, “When the commandment or law came, sin revived, 
and <i>I died</i>:” That is, he found himself dead. He found himself under the curse 
of the law, which was contained in the original threatening, “In the day thou 
eatest thereof, thou shalt surely die.” If Paul found himself dead, agreeable to 
the threatening of the law, then Adam did really die in the same sense, or the same 
death: and sin, even the first act of disobedience, wrought this death in him. The 
evil which the law threatened, “Thou shalt surely die,” in this sense, <pb n="257" id="iii.viii-Page_257" />
came upon him. He fell under the curse. This sentence fell upon him, and he was 
a <i>dead man</i>. Paul calls this <i>death</i>, or dying; and by this tells us 
what dying means in the threatening; and that Adam did die on that day in which 
he ate the forbidden fruit.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.viii-p8">Bat if this were not so, and Adam did not die the death threatened 
on the day he sinned, this may be consistent with the execution of the threatening, 
according to the true intent of it. The threatening, “In the day thou eatest thereof, 
thou shalt surely die,” expresses two things, viz. The <i>certainty</i> of the punishment, 
as infallibly connected with transgression; and that the threatened penalty should 
follow on <i>one</i> or the <i>first</i> act of rebellion. We find much the same 
language used, to express one or both these; and not that the threatening should 
be immediately executed, or on the day in which the crime was committed. “The righteousness 
of the righteous shall not deliver him <i>in the day</i> of his transgression. As 
for the wicked less of the wicked, he shall not fall thereby <i>in the day</i> that 
he turneth from his wickedness: Neither shall the righteous be able to live <i>in 
the day that he</i> sinneth; but for his iniquity that he hath committed, <i>he 
shall die</i> or it.”<note n="178" id="iii.viii-p8.1"><p class="normal" id="iii.viii-p9"><scripRef id="iii.viii-p9.1" passage="Ezekiel xxxiii. 12" parsed="|Ezek|33|12|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Ezek.33.12">Ezekiel xxxiii. 12</scripRef>, <scripRef passage="Ezekiel 33:13" id="iii.viii-p9.2" parsed="|Ezek|33|13|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Ezek.33.13">13</scripRef>.</p></note> This does not express 
the time <i>when</i> death should be executed or take place; but the <i>certainty</i> 
of the punishment. “For it shall be that <i>on the day</i> that thou goest 
out, and passest over the brook Kidron, <i>thou shall know for certain, that thou 
shalt surely die</i>.”<note n="179" id="iii.viii-p9.3"><p class="normal" id="iii.viii-p10"><scripRef id="iii.viii-p10.1" passage="1 Kings ii. 37" parsed="|1Kgs|2|37|0|0" osisRef="Bible:1Kgs.2.37">1 Kings ii. 37</scripRef>.</p></note> This does not mean, that he 
should die on the same day in which he should pass over Kidron; but that he should 
certainly be put to death for this offence, without any farther trial.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.viii-p11">This apostasy of our first parents, was a <i>total</i> apostasy: 
That is, by giving themselves up to this sin, an inclination to sin took the dominion 
in their hearts, and they wholly lost all their moral rectitude and holiness, or 
the moral image of God, in which they were created. This is not expressly asserted 
in the history of their sin; but it may be inferred from the nature of the case. 
By this transgression they forfeited all favour from their Maker, and fell under 
his displeasure, and were cursed, <pb n="258" id="iii.viii-Page_258" />
according to the law and constitution, under which they were when they sinned; and 
it was inconsistent therefore to shew them any favour; especially such a favour, 
as preserving them from total apostasy, or their being continued in the exercise 
of love to God, while they were under that constitution, and antecedent to the revelation 
of the dispensation of grace. Moreover, the first act of sin carried in it an inclination 
to universal sinfulness, and opposition to holiness in general, or to all and every 
degree of holiness; and according to the natural course of things, would issue in 
total depravity, in the exclusion of all moral good, and the complete possession 
and reign of moral evil in their hearts. This consisted in their ceasing to love 
God, and loving themselves only; which <i>self love</i>, or selfishness, was in 
every degree of it opposed to the law under which they were, and the fruitful source 
of all sin; which will more fully appear, when this subject will come more particularly 
into view, in its proper place. There was nothing therefore that could prevent their 
total apostasy, or becoming wholly sinful, and opposed to the law of God, and all 
holiness, unless God had miraculously interposed, contrary to the law and constitution 
under which they sinned, to prevent it, and exercised mere sovereign favour, which, 
as has been observed, would be inconsistent with the constitution under which they 
sinned.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.viii-p12">The above reasoning, to prove that the apostasy of man was total, 
appears to be confirmed by the apostasy of the angels who sinned. It is presumed 
all will grant that <i>their</i> first apostasy was not partial, but total. If the 
angels fell totally in their first rebellion, why not man also? It is true that 
under another and a new dispensation of grace through a Mediator, holiness is introduced 
and maintained in the heart of the believer, in a small and low degree, while there 
is also a degree of sinful exercise; and both these, sin and holiness, continue 
through life; and particular acts of sin of which believers are guilty, do not bring 
on total depravity, and wholly extinguish every degree of divine love: But this 
may with propriety be called a <i>miracle</i>, being contrary to the course of nature, 
and the constitution of things, which originally took place, and is the effect of 
the new constitution, <pb n="259" id="iii.viii-Page_259" />
by which the original order or course of nature is counteracted by the introduction 
of a gracious dispensation; and the nature and natural course of sin is interrupted 
and opposed, by special divine interposition: But this is so far from an evidence 
that our first parents could go into an overt act of rebellion, consistent with 
retaining any degree of love to God, that it is a proof of the contrary, and that 
man, by the first apostasy, sunk into total depravity, and became wholly a rebel, 
and altogether opposed to the divine law.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.viii-p13">It has been observed, and it is thought proved in the foregoing 
chapter, that all mankind were created and comprehended in the first man; as much 
as were all the trees and plants, in the first trees and plants which were made, 
with the seed in themselves, to produce a succession of trees and plants after their 
kind, to the end of the world. Therefore in what God said to Adam, and his transactions 
with him in giving him law, and forming a covenant with him, he was considered and 
treated as comprehending all mankind; and he was the real and constituted head of 
the whole race, so that his obedience or transgression should affect all mankind, 
as it affected him, and was to be considered as the obedience or disobedience of 
all. It is proposed now, to attempt to explain this point more fully, and show how 
far, and in what respects, all Adam’s posterity are comprehended in the first transgression, 
and affected by it.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.viii-p14">I. By the constitution and covenant with Adam, his first disobedience 
was the disobedience of all mankind. That is, the sin, and consequent ruin of all 
the human race, was by this constitution infallibly connected with the first sin 
of the head and father of the race. By the divine constitution, the appointment 
of God, if the head and father of mankind sinned, the whole race of men, all his 
posterity, should sin; and in this sense it should be the sin of the whole. Accordingly, 
when the head became a sinner, and moral corruption took possession of the heart, 
a sure foundation was laid, by the constitution under which man was, for the same 
sin and moral corruption to take place and spread through all the human race: Just 
as by a divine appointment, or a law of nature, the $ap of the root or original 
stock of a tree <pb n="260" id="iii.viii-Page_260" />
passes into the numerous limbs, twigs and the fruit of the tree, as they successively 
grow out of it. If the sap or nature of the root or stock be bad, sour or poisonous, 
the same is communicated to the whole, and every branch, and all the fruit and seed 
of the whole tree, is corrupt, sour, or poisonous, and of all the trees which spring 
from that, or are produced by the seed of it. Thus, if any tree was, when first 
created, of a poisonous nature, and produced such fruit, all that race of trees, 
or all that should spring from it, would of course be of the same nature. And if 
a tree or plant, which was created al first good and wholesome, did degenerate, 
and become corrupt and poisonous, all that should proceed from that, would, of course, 
be equally corrupt.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.viii-p15">The disobedience of Adam decided the character of all his natural 
posterity; and rendered it certain, according to a divine, revealed constitution, 
that they should be born, and rise into existence as moral agents, in disobedience 
and rebellion: And that the same moral corruption which then took place in his heart, 
should spread through the whole race of mankind. In this sense, the first sin carried 
in it the sin of all mankind, and contained the seed, and was the foundation of 
all the moral corruption of the human race; as by this they were all constituted 
sinners,</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.viii-p16">II. As the first sin was, in the sense just explained, the common 
sin of all mankind, as the disobedience of them all was infallibly connected with 
it, and by it all the human race were constituted or made sinners; so as this first 
sin brought condemnation, or the penalty of the law on Adam, it fell equally on 
all mankind. For as the sin of Adam inferred and implied the disobedience of all, 
the consequent condemnation of all was equally implied and involved in the condemnation 
of Adam. Or the condemnation and penalty which fell on Adam, the father and head 
of mankind, really came upon all his posterity. As the sin was common to all, so 
was the curse. And it is here particularly to be observed, that as Adam first disobeyed, 
and condemnation and the curse came upon him, for his disobedience and in consequence 
of it; so these take place just in the same order in his posterity, their sin, or 
the moral corruption, <pb n="261" id="iii.viii-Page_261" />which is common to all mankind, first takes 
place, as the ground and reason of their condemnation, and liableness to the threatened 
penalty.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.viii-p17">The evidence that this was the original constitution under which 
mankind were placed has been in some measure given in the foregoing chapter. But 
there is more clear and certain evidence, that things have actually taken place 
in this manner and according to such a constitution; and that the sin of all the 
posterity of Adam, and the consequent condemnation and curse, were thus connected 
with the first sin of their common father and head, and come upon all mankind as 
the certain and appointed consequence of the original apostasy of man; the former 
being implied, and involved in the latter. This is now to be brought into view, 
and carefully considered.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.viii-p18">1. The pain, sorrow, and train of evils in this world, which issue 
in the death of the body, to which all mankind are sentenced, and which actually 
came upon them all, in consequence of the original transgression, are a standing 
evidence, and full demonstration, that the sin and condemnation of all the posterity 
of Adam were infallibly connected with that first sin, and involved in it.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.viii-p19">Though these evils were denounced to the first parents of mankind 
on their disobedience, and they only are addressed in the sentence; yet it is evident 
from fact, that all their posterity were included in them, and fell under the same 
sentence, and were doomed to the same evils. This is not only an evidence that Adam 
was considered, as including his posterity as their common head, so that what was 
said to him and of him, was said to, and of all mankind; but also renders it certain, 
that all his children were considered as sinners, in consequence of the apostasy 
of their first father; and that there was a certain connection between the first 
sin, and the sin and guilt of all mankind. For surely it would not be proper or 
just to sentence all mankind to these evils, when considered as perfectly innocent. 
There is therefore no possible way to account for this, consistent with the righteousness 
and equity of the divine government, but by supposing and granting that all the 
posterity of Adam were constituted, and considered to be <pb n="262" id="iii.viii-Page_262" />sinners, 
in consequence of his sinning, or by his first offence, there being a certain constituted 
connection between his first transgression, and the sinning of all the human race.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.viii-p20">Separation of soul and body, and the numerous particular natural 
evils which now take place among mankind in this life, could have had no existence, 
if the original threatening had been executed without mitigation; or had not the 
redemption taken place, by which mankind are put into a new state of probation, 
as has been before observed. Nevertheless, had not man sinned, these evils which 
issue in the death of the body could not have taken place, as redemption also could 
not. Therefore these evils are introduced, and afflicted on man, in consequence 
of sin, and as a standing testimony of God’s displeasure with him, and consequently 
cannot be inflicted on any but sinners. We are therefore sure that as the death 
of the body, with other attendant evils, are inflicted on all mankind, they are 
all considered and treated as sinners; and consequently, that they are really sinners; 
and that their being such had a certain connection with the first sin, upon which 
they were condemned to these evils.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.viii-p21">Adam is sentenced to the death of the body, and all the train 
of preceding evils, <i>because</i> he had sinned, and offended his Maker; and this 
is expressly declared to be the ground of the sentence. And as this sentence was 
extended to all his posterity, and they were included in it, as much as Adam himself, 
they were considered and treated by this as being sinners, whenever they should 
exist; which could not be, unless there were a certain established connection between 
the sin of the first man, and the sinfulness of all mankind. If it were possible 
that any of Adam’s natural posterity should be innocent, this sentence could not 
be extended to them; but they must have been excepted. Therefore as all are included 
in the sentence, not one of mankind can possibly be innocent; but the sinfulness 
and guilt of all are infallibly connected with the sin of Adam, and included in 
it, by an established constitution.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.viii-p22">Many particular instances of the death of men, who have been cut 
off in divine providence, are represented <pb n="263" id="iii.viii-Page_263" />to be expressions of God’s 
displeasure with them for their sins, such as the drowning of the old world; the 
destruction of the inhabitants of Sodom, &amp;:c. and innumerable other instances. How 
much more must the sentence of death upon all mankind, be an expression of God’s 
displeasure with them, for their sinfulness and guilt!</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.viii-p23">2. That the sin, and the consequent guilt and condemnation of 
all the human race, were by divine constitution connected with Adam’s sinning, is 
very particularly and expressly asserted by St. Paul.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.viii-p24">“Wherefore, as by one man sin entered into the world, and death 
by sin; and so death passed upon all men, for that all have sinned. Through the 
offence of one, many died. For the judgment was by one, to condemnation. By one 
man’s offence, death reigned by one. By the offence of one, judgment came upon all 
men to condemnation. By one man’s disobedience, many <i>were made sinners</i>.”<note n="180" id="iii.viii-p24.1"><p class="normal" id="iii.viii-p25">
<scripRef id="iii.viii-p25.1" passage="Romans v. 12" parsed="|Rom|5|12|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Rom.5.12">Romans v. 12</scripRef>, &amp;c.</p></note></p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.viii-p26">Here sin, condemnation and death, are expressly said to be introduced 
into the world, upon all mankind, by <i>one</i> offence, one act of disobedience 
of one man, that is, Adam. When it is said that sin <i>entered into the world</i> 
by one, the meaning cannot be merely that one man sinned first, or that Adam committed 
the first sin, sinned before any of his posterity did sin; for this would be to 
assert nothing to the purpose. But by sin entering into the world, is meant its 
taking place among mankind, and spreading or extending to ail the posterity of Adam. 
Death entered into the world as sin did, as the consequence of it, by one man; and 
this passed or came upon <i>all men</i>, just as sin did. This is expressly asserted 
in the words immediately following, “For that all have sinned.” By one man sin entered 
into the world of mankind, as the common sin of all, and extended to every one of 
his posterity, and by this sin, death entered also, and came upon all mankind, in 
that by this one offence all became sinners; there being an established connection 
between the sin of this one man, and the sinning of all. That this is the truth, 
and what is asserted in those words, is made certain beyond dispute, by the repetition 
of the same assertion, in other 
<pb n="264" id="iii.viii-Page_264" />and more express words, in the <scripRef passage="Rom 5:19" id="iii.viii-p26.1" parsed="|Rom|5|19|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Rom.5.19">19th verse</scripRef>. 
“By one man’s disobedience, many were made sinners.” Here the disobedience of Adam 
is said, in this sense, to be the disobedience of all his posterity, that their 
sinning was connected with his disobedience, or implied and involved in it; so that 
by his sinning, they were all made sinners, or constituted sinners, as the Greek 
word properly signifies. That is, by a fixed, divine constitution, if Adam sinned, 
all his posterity were to become sinners; so that by his disobedience, he fixed 
this character upon all mankind.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.viii-p27">Condemnation and death, or judgment to condemnation, came upon 
all men, considered as sinners, or as a consequence of sin, as it came upon Adam. 
It is represented in this light in this passage. Death entered into the world <i>
by sin</i>, and came upon all men, because, or inasmuch as all men were sinners, 
being made sinners, by the disobedience of Adam their head, by virtue of the divine 
constitution and covenant made with him, they all fell under condemnation to death, 
considered in this character, or as sinners. “<i>By</i> one man’s offence death 
reigned.” All mankind being constituted offenders, or sinners by one offence of 
Adam, death took place, and held dominion and reigned over all. Again he says, 
<scripRef passage="Rom 5:21" id="iii.viii-p27.1" parsed="|Rom|5|21|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Rom.5.21">verse 21</scripRef>, “As sin hath reigned <i>
unto death</i>.” Death is asserted to be the consequence of the reign of sin in 
the world, or among mankind.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.viii-p28">It has been observed, that by <span class="sc" id="iii.viii-p28.1">death</span>, which 
is mentioned six times in this passage, is evidently meant eternal destruction, 
or the second death, as it is put in opposition to eternal life, and is the wages 
of sin; unless death mentioned in the <scripRef passage="Rom 5:14" id="iii.viii-p28.2" parsed="|Rom|5|14|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Rom.5.14">
14th verse</scripRef>, be an exception. But if it be, and it were granted that the 
death of the body is intended whenever death is mentioned in this paragraph; yet 
this would not evade or weaken the evidence and proof it contains, that the posterity 
of Adam are constituted sinners by his first sin, so as by it to fall under condemnation, 
and become justly exposed to the second death. For if a moral agent be in such a 
sense a sinner, as to deserve any evil, he must deserve infinite evil, that is, 
endless punishment; for this, as has been proved, is the just wages of sin, and <pb n="265" id="iii.viii-Page_265" />
what every sin deserves. Therefore if any evil, even that of the death of the body, 
be inflicted on mankind, in consequence of Adam’s first act of disobedience, it 
carries in it a certain evidence, that they become sinners by that sin of his, there 
being an established connection between his sin and their being sinners, and that 
they deserve all the evil which the first sin deserved, and was threatened to the 
first act of disobedience, which was endless misery, the just wages of sin. In this 
view, the death of the body, to which all mankind are subjected, is a standing evidence 
that they are sinners, and consequently that they deserve endless punishment: For 
if they were not sinners, they could not be sentenced to this evil; and if they 
are sinners, and deserve this evil, they deserve infinite evil, which is the just 
desert of every sin. And as this death comes on all mankind in consequence of one 
act of disobedience of the first man, the head and father of all, it is a certain 
evidence that by his sin, all his posterity are constituted and become sinners, 
and were considered as such, as soon as Adam sinned; otherwise his sin could not 
have brought this death upon all mankind, or upon any but the first sinner. And 
their being condemned to this death, necessarily implied their personal sin in consequence 
of Adam’s sinning, and just desert of the second death, as has been shown.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.viii-p29">Hence it appears, that as long as this passage of scripture is 
to be found in the Bible, we have good evidence that the sin and ruin of all mankind 
was implied, and certainly involved in the first act of disobedience of Adam.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.viii-p30">3. This is also demonstrably certain, in that the posterity of 
Adam are all considered and treated as sinners, and deserving and exposed to endless 
ruin, in the method which has been opened and prosecuted for the recovery and salvation 
of man, by Jesus Christ. In the revelation of this salvation, and all that has been 
done to effect it, it is supposed that all mankind are lost in sin; that every one 
of the natural posterity of Adam who has been born, has been a sinner; and that 
every one that shall be born and exist to the end of the world, will exist a sinner, 
and in a state of condemnation and <pb n="266" id="iii.viii-Page_266" />
ruin. The gospel is represented as providing relief for all who believe, and the
<i>only</i> way in which mankind can be saved, all being condemned and infallibly 
lost forever, who are not saved by Christ. There could be no reason for this, unless 
it were certain that all mankind would rise into existence <i>sinners</i>, and so 
be involved in condemnation and ruin, and stand in absolute need of the revealed 
Saviour. But this could not be, unless this was implied in the apostasy of the father 
of mankind, and upon this was fixed and made certain.<note n="181" id="iii.viii-p30.1"><p class="normal" id="iii.viii-p31">It is granted that all 
mankind might have been in a state of apostasy, had not this been the consequence 
of the sin of Adam, and connected with this, and made certain by it; but that they 
should be considered and treated as in such a state, and a Saviour be provided for 
them, and ordered to be preached and offered to them, when nothing had taken place 
with which this was connected, and by which it was rendered certain, appears to 
be highly improper and inconsistent.</p></note> How could a Saviour from sin and destruction 
be provided and revealed for mankind, immediately upon the sin of Adam, if this 
sin did not involve the sin and ruin of all? for the innocent could have no need 
of such a Saviour. And with what propriety could the gospel be ordered to be preached 
to all nations, and to every one of the human race to the end of the world, if it 
were not <i>certain</i> that every one was in a state of sin and ruin? This can 
be well accounted for, if the sin and ruin of Adam’s posterity were connected with 
his first sin, and involved in it, by virtue of the covenant and constitution made 
with the father of mankind; and the whole is consistent and easy to be understood: 
But no consistent, rational, satisfactory account can be given of this, on any other 
supposition.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.viii-p32">4. Agreeable to this, mankind are represented in the scripture, 
to be universally depraved and morally corrupt; and this appears to be true from 
fact and experience. It is needless to adduce all the passages of scripture in which 
this is asserted. St. Paul asserts this in such express and strong terms, when he 
is attending particularly to this point, that it will be established sufficiently 
for the present purpose, by appealing to his words.<note n="182" id="iii.viii-p32.1"><p class="normal" id="iii.viii-p33"><scripRef id="iii.viii-p33.1" passage="Romans iii. 9" parsed="|Rom|3|9|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Rom.3.9">Romans iii. 9</scripRef>, &amp;c.</p></note> 
“We have before proved both Jews and Gentiles, <i>that they are all under sin</i>: 
As it is written, <pb n="267" id="iii.viii-Page_267" />There is <i>none</i> righteous, no, <i>not one</i>. 
They are <i>all gone out of the way</i>, they are <i>together</i> become unprofitable, 
there is <i>none</i> that doeth good, <i>no, not one</i>,—That <i>every mouth</i> 
may be stopped, and <i>all the world</i> may become guilty before God.” This witness 
is supported, and appears to be true from the character mankind have given of themselves, 
by their general conduct in all ages, as there never has appeared to be one perfectly 
upright, sinless person; and in general all nations and generations, of every age, 
have been exceeding corrupt and sinful; and that while many of them have had great 
light and advantage to be wise and virtuous, and when great and special means have 
been used with them in the best manner suited to make them so. By a great variety 
of experiments which have been made, it appears that mankind are so sunk into sin, 
and strongly inclined to evil, that no external applications, means, motives, and 
advantages are sufficient to reclaim them. And children, as soon as they are capable 
of manifesting any moral disposition or inclination, universally discover that which 
is contrary to the law of God.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.viii-p34">If what the scripture asserts on this head, wanted any support 
from fact, this character which mankind have themselves drawn by their practice 
would be a sufficient one.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.viii-p35">When St. Paul had asserted and proved in the words just quoted, 
that all mankind are become wholly corrupt and sinful, that “all have sinned, and 
come short of the glory of God,” he proceeds to account for this, and show the ground 
and origin of the universal sinfulness of the posterity of Adam, in the paragraph 
which has been considered. “By one man sin entered into the world, and death by 
sin: and so death passed upon all men, for that <i>all have sinned</i>. By one man’s 
disobedience, <i>many were made sinners</i>.”<note n="183" id="iii.viii-p35.1"><p class="normal" id="iii.viii-p36"><scripRef id="iii.viii-p36.1" passage="Romans v. 12" parsed="|Rom|5|12|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Rom.5.12">Romans v. 12</scripRef>, &amp;c.</p></note> And 
there is the greatest reason to believe, and rest satisfied in this account, not 
only as it is given by divine inspiration, but as it is the only rational, consistent 
and satisfactory account of this interesting affair, that can be given.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.viii-p37">That such a constitution is just and wise, and that mankind have 
no reason to object to it as injurious to 
<pb n="268" id="iii.viii-Page_268" />them, is evident from what has been observed upon it in the foregoing 
chapter.<note n="184" id="iii.viii-p37.1"><p class="normal" id="iii.viii-p38">Page 247, &amp;c.</p></note> But that this may appear yet more evident, and 
all objections be obviated, a particular explanation of this matter, and vindication 
of the divine conduct herein, will be now attempted.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.viii-p39">It is carefully to be observed, that sin does not take place in 
the posterity of Adam, in consequence of his sin, or that they are not constituted 
sinners by his disobedience, <i>as a punishment, of the penalty of the law coming 
upon them for his sin</i>: It is not to be supposed that the offence of Adam is
<i>imputed</i> to them to their condemnation, while they are considered as in themselves, 
in their own persons innocent: Or that they are guilty of the sin of their first 
father, <i>antecedent to their own sinfulness</i>. But all that is asserted, as 
what the scripture teaches on this head is, that by a divine constitution, there 
is a certain connection between the first sin of Adam, and the sinfulness of his 
posterity; so that as he sinned and fell under condemnation, they in consequence 
of this became sinful and condemned. Therefore when Adam had sinned, by this the 
character and state of all his posterity were fixed, and they were by virtue of 
the covenant made with Adam, constituted or made sinners like him; and therefore 
were considered as such, before they had actual existence. It was made certain, 
and known and declared to be so, that all mankind should sin as Adam had done, and 
fully consent to his transgression, and join in the rebellion which he began; and,
<i>by this</i>, bring upon themselves the guilt of their father’s sin, by consenting 
to it, joining with him in it, and making it their own sin.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.viii-p40">This cannot be objected to as an unjust appointment, or a constitution 
injurious to mankind, without equally objecting to God’s willing and ordering things 
so as to make it certain that any of his creatures should sin. If it was his will 
that Adam should sin, and he constituted and ordered things so that it was certain 
that he would sin, and he had a right to do this; then it was right and just to 
will and determine that all the posterity of Adam should sin, and to form a constitution, 
which established a certain connection of the latter with the <pb n="269" id="iii.viii-Page_269" />former. 
The disobedience of Adam was connected with something which preceded it, and of 
which it was the consequence; and it was determined and fixed by God, as has been 
proved, and which all must grant who hold that God did permit Adam to sin: But none 
will say or think that this was a punishment inflicted on Adam, thus to determine, 
and form and fix a constitution which made his sinning certain; or that this was 
injurious to Adam, or in the least degree improper or unwise. And if this was just 
and wise and good, then it was equally so, to form a constitution which connected 
the sin of all mankind with the first sin of the father of the human race. Or, if 
he might and did permit Adam to sin, consistent with justice, wisdom and goodness, 
he might, consistent with all these, permit everyone of his posterity to sin, and 
therefore determine to do it. And if God had a right to order things so that all 
mankind should sin, independent of their connection with Adam and his sin, and this 
be no more unjust or injurious to them, than to order things so that Adam and myriads 
of angels should sin; then certainly no wrong is done to them, by ordering that 
this should depend upon, and take place in consequence of this sin of Adam. No objection 
can be made to this, which ib not equally an objection to God’s ordering things 
so that sin should take place, and has taken place in any instance, among angels 
or men.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.viii-p41">The following propositions must be granted, as axioms of indubitable 
truth, and may serve to give light to the point under consideration.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.viii-p42">1. Every creature capable of moral agency and holiness is entirely 
dependent on God, not only for his continuance in existence, but for all his moral 
exercises; and especially for his moral excellence or holiness. This is a greater 
and higher gift than mere existence, and when it is given, the continuance of it 
is entirely dependent on the will of God. The most excellent creature in the exercise 
of perfect holiness, is, in his own nature changeable, and may become sinful; and 
nothing can secure him from this but the will and agency of the infinite, unchangeable 
Being.</p>
<pb n="270" id="iii.viii-Page_270" />
<p class="normal" id="iii.viii-p43">2. God is under no obligation to preserve the moral agents which 
he creates, from sinning. If this proposition were not self-evident, the actual 
existence of sin is a demonstration of the truth of it.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.viii-p44">3. God may, therefore, for wise reasons, will and determine not 
to prevent the sin and consequent ruin of his creatures; which is really willing 
that sin should take place. The truth of this proposition is also demonstrated by 
the sin which has actually taken place; for this could not have been, unless God, 
all things considered, willed it should be, otherwise it must have taken place contrary 
to his will, or while he was not willing it should exist, which is infinitely impossible.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.viii-p45">4. If God may, and has actually exercised his will and choice 
about the existence of sin, and determined in favour of its actually taking place, 
and this be consistent with his wisdom, holiness and goodness, as it certainly is; 
then it is consistent with his glorious moral character, to dispose, order and do 
every thing which is necessary to be, ordered and done independent of the creature, 
and previous to their actually sinning, in order to the certain existence of this 
event. This has been observed in a former chapter; where it has been also shown 
that the former, viz. that God’s willing the existence of sin, does necessarily 
imply the latter: and that these are not really two distinct things; but one and 
the same.<note n="185" id="iii.viii-p45.1"><p class="normal" id="iii.viii-p46">See chap. iv. p. 129, 130, &amp;c.</p></note></p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.viii-p47">From all this, it appears, that God, being under no obligation 
to preserve any of his rational creatures from sinning, may, consistent with his 
righteousness, wisdom and holiness, order things so that any number of them shall 
become sinful, when this is most for his glory and the general good. Accordingly, 
it was agreeable to his will and purpose that vast numbers of the angels should 
fall into sin: And had this will and purpose reached <i>all of them</i>, they would 
have had no reason to complain of any injustice or wrong done to them. And therefore 
those who have not sinned, must ascribe it to the sovereign, distinguishing, undeserved 
favour of God, that they have been preserved innocent and holy, when so great a 
number of them went off into a state of rebellion. <pb n="271" id="iii.viii-Page_271" />And he had a right 
to order it so that any number, or all of mankind, should become sinners, as they 
rose into existence, had there been no constitution connecting their sinning with 
the sin of Adam; and no injustice or injury would have been done to any. And since 
God has seen fit to order and constitute things so that the universal sinfulness 
of man should take place, in connection with the sin of Adam, and as the unfailing 
consequence of it, which he might have ordered without doing them any wrong, had 
not Adam first sinned, or without any consideration of his sin, or connection with 
it, surely there is no ground or colour of an objection to it, as being injurious 
to them. If mankind had no claim to be exempted from sin, had there been no connection 
between them and Adam, or had they no common head or father; then surely they have 
no reason to complain, that they are become sinners by a constitution, appointing 
Adam to be their public head, and connecting their becoming sinners with his sinning.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.viii-p48">It is a notorious and acknowledged fact, that all mankind are 
sinners; sinning is infallibly connected with their existence. There is certainly 
some unfailing constitution or law, which constantly and effectually operates to 
produce this effect in all Adam’s posterity. We are sure this is just, and no wrong 
is done to man, that sin does thus infallibly take place in all, by some steady, 
efficacious cause, though we were not able to tell by what means, or in what way 
this universal corruption of man has been introduced, and taken place. And shall 
we complain as being injured by this, because God has seen fit to favour us with 
a revelation, informing us how, and in what way this universal sinfulness of the 
human race has been introduced and taken place; “That by one man sin entered into 
the world: And by one man’s disobedience, many (even all his posterity) are made 
sinners?”</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.viii-p49">And to complain of this, is not only to find fault with that which 
is just, by which no wrong is done to us; but to object to a most wise and good 
constitution. This constitution is perfectly agreeable to the natural relation in 
which Adam’s posterity stood to their common head and parent; and all mankind were 
so comprehended <pb n="272" id="iii.viii-Page_272" />and included in the first man, that it was natural, 
proper and wise to deal with him as including all his posterity, and to constitute 
him to act for them all, as being in him. And there farther appears a natural propriety 
and fitness in such a constitution, if we consider the nature and tendency of sin, 
and the inclination, wish and attempt of the sinner who rebels against God. Adam’s 
first rebellion contained in it a desire and wish that all his posterity might sin 
as he did. This became agreeable to his heart as soon as sin entered into it; and 
so far as he had power and influence, it would certainly take place. To suppose 
the contrary, is inconsistent and absurd. The corruption and rebellion of all Adam’s 
children therefore must be the consequence of his sinning, unless his inclination, 
desire and attempt were crossed and counteracted. And his sin had a mighty and almost 
irresistible tendency to lead all his posterity into the same rebellion; and who 
can say this would not be the consequence, without one exception, had things taken 
their natural course, without being opposed and prevented by divine interposition? 
Adam’s sin had a natural tendency to corrupt the world of mankind, and according 
to the natural course of things would spread to every individual of his posterity. 
And this was agreeable to the inclination and choice of the father of mankind. The 
language of his transgression was, “Let all my posterity sin as I do, and be as 
I am; let them rise into existence in my own image and likeness: So far as I have 
power to beget and produce them, they shall be rebels like myself.”—Therefore, according 
to the natural course of things, and the nature and tendency of sin, and agreeable 
to the inclination and choice of Adam, the first act of sin by the common father 
and head of mankind, contained in it the infection and sin of all the human race; 
and must corrupt the whole, and issue in the rebellion and ruin of every one, unless 
counteracted and prevented by divine interposition. Hence it appears that the divine 
constitution connecting the sin and ruin of all mankind with the first sin of their 
common father, is so far from being arbitrary and unnatural, that it is an establishment, 
agreeable to the natural course, tendency and connection of things, and perfectly <pb n="273" id="iii.viii-Page_273" />
consonant to the nature of sin, and serves to make a display of this. And that a 
contrary constitution, which should prevent the spreading of the sin of Adam to 
his posterity, or corrupting any one of them, would be unnatural and improper, as 
it would counteract and prevent the natural tendency, and the nature, course and 
connection of things; and therefore would not have been wise and good—while the 
constitution which has taken place is agreeable to the nature of things, and both 
wise and good. It appears most wise and best that if any of mankind sinned, all 
should be sinners, and constituted so by the first sin, as this has laid a proper 
and ample foundation for the glorious work of redemption, for the character and 
works of the Redeemer, of whom Adam in this way was made a type,—the Redeemer and 
his works, and the consequent glory, being the grand design and end of all. But 
this will rise more clearly into view as we proceed.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.viii-p50">It must be farther observed, that there is no reasonable objection 
to this constitution, in that it not only establishes a connection between the sin 
of Adam and the sinning of his posterity; but that the latter should <i>be born 
in sin, so as to begin to sin, as soon as they begin to act as moral agents</i>. 
For if a moral agent may begin to sin at any time, he may begin to sin as soon as 
he begins to exist with a capacity of sinning. And if God is not obliged to prevent 
his sinning at any time of his existence, he is under no obligation to prevent it 
the first moment of his existence. Therefore he had a right to determine the sinfulness 
of all Adam’s posterity as soon as they should exist, as a certain consequence of 
his disobedience: And there is no more ground of objection to this, than there is 
to Adam’s posterity sinning at any time of their existence, in consequence of his 
sinning.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.viii-p51">If a person can have no reason to complain of any one but himself, 
if he be inclined to sin, and actually disobeys the divine command, at any time, 
at whatever distance from his beginning to exist, he will be equally without reason 
to complain that he is injured by any one, but by himself, if he be inclined to 
sin as soon as he begins to exist, and though he never were otherwise inclined. <pb n="274" id="iii.viii-Page_274" />
If any one should say, if he had not sinned early, even from his beginning to act, 
he should not have sinned now; or if he had not been always inclined to sin from 
his first existence, he should not have been inclined to sin since, with a view 
to exculpate himself, would this be any excuse? Was not his <i>first</i> inclination 
to sin, his own inclination, and as really blameable as if it had not been the first, 
or so soon? And because he began to sin so soon, does this excuse his sinning afterwards, 
and continuing to sin?—</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.viii-p52">It seems proper, if not necessary, that if moral corruption be 
derived from Adam to his children, by a fixed law or constitution, it should take 
place from the beginning of their existence. If by their being his children, they 
become corrupt, they must of consequence be corrupt as soon as they exist, or become 
his children. If it were not so, it would not appear from fact, that they became 
sinful by being the posterity of Adam, or that their moral corruption was, by divine 
constitution, connected with his sin, by their being his children.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.viii-p53">Agreeable to this, the scripture represents all mankind as sinful 
from the beginning of their existence. “The imagination of man’s heart is evil
<i>from his youth</i>.”<note n="186" id="iii.viii-p53.1"><p class="normal" id="iii.viii-p54"><scripRef id="iii.viii-p54.1" passage="Gen. viii. 21" parsed="|Gen|8|21|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Gen.8.21">Gen. viii. 21</scripRef>.</p></note> 
That is, his infancy, from the beginning of his existence. “David says of himself, 
“Behold, I was shapen in iniquity; and in sin did my mother conceive me.”<note n="187" id="iii.viii-p54.2"><p class="normal" id="iii.viii-p55">
<scripRef id="iii.viii-p55.1" passage="Psalm li. 5" parsed="|Ps|51|5|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Ps.51.5">Psalm li. 5</scripRef>.</p></note> 
This must be as true of all mankind, as of David. “The wicked are estranged from 
the womb, they go astray as soon as they be born, speaking lies.”<note n="188" id="iii.viii-p55.2"><p class="normal" id="iii.viii-p56"><scripRef id="iii.viii-p56.1" passage="Psalm lviii. 3" parsed="|Ps|58|3|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Ps.58.3">Psalm lviii. 
3</scripRef>.</p></note> Here it is asserted at least, that as soon as they begin to act, they 
sin. And though it cannot be precisely determined how soon this is; yet it hence 
appears that they are <i>by nature</i> corrupt, and they begin to exist with that 
moral corruption, which is the same thing that appears as soon as there is opportunity, 
in visible action, in opposition to the rule of truth and duty, the divine law. 
The words immediately following these are “Their poison is like the poison of a 
serpent.” The serpent is generated a poisonous creature. Poison is in his nature 
from the beginning of his existence, and when he begins to bite 
<pb n="275" id="iii.viii-Page_275" />that is acted out, with which he was born. There appears to be evident 
reference to this, in these words. The wicked are said to be <i>estranged from the 
womb</i>; to go astray, speaking lies, <i>as soon as they be born</i>: And <i>in 
this respect</i> their poison, their wickedness, <i>is like</i> the poison of a 
serpent. Solomon says, “Foolishness is <i>bound up in the heart of a child</i>.” 
By folly and foolishness in his writings, he generally means sin, or moral corruption: 
And certainly this is meant here, because he says, “The rod of correction will drive 
it far from him.” The rod of correction can drive no other foolishness away, but 
that which is of a moral kind. The expression is very strong and emphatical, and 
asserts that sin has gotten fast hold, and is firmly fixed in the heart of a young 
child, and that this is true of every child which is born. How could the early, 
native corruption of children be more fully expressed?—The same is asserted by Christ, 
when he says to Nicodemus, “That which is born of the flesh, is flesh.”<note n="189" id="iii.viii-p56.2"><p class="normal" id="iii.viii-p57"><scripRef id="iii.viii-p57.1" passage="John iii. 6" parsed="|John|3|6|0|0" osisRef="Bible:John.3.6">John 
iii. 6</scripRef>.</p></note> It is abundantly evident from the whole passage in which these words 
are found, that by flesh here is meant moral corruption, or sin, in which sense 
this word is frequently used in the scriptures, especially in the writings of St. 
Paul. According to this, man is born in a state of moral corruption.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.viii-p58">A child, an infant, as soon as he exists, may have moral corruption 
or sin. As soon as he has any mental motion, which is of the nature of inclination, 
this motion, disposition or inclination, may be wrong, and have in it the foundation 
and seeds of every sin, being of the same nature with the sinful motions and inclinations 
of the hearts of adult persons. These motions, though invisible and unperceived 
by us, do really, and in the sight of the Omniscient Being, fix the actual moral 
character of the child, which discovers itself to men, as it has opportunity, and 
there is capacity to express it in actions and words. This is confirmed by observation 
and experience. Children commonly, before they can speak, discover that selfishness, 
that wilfulness and obstinacy, which is the root and source of all the sin which 
takes place among mankind. This, therefore, is of the <pb n="276" id="iii.viii-Page_276" />same nature 
with moral evil in general, and was in the heart or mind when it first existed; 
and has grown up to a greater degree of strength, as the mind has been enlarged, 
and appears and is acted out, as the capacity increases, and opportunity and occasion 
are offered.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.viii-p59">This sin, which lakes place in the posterity of Adam, is not properly 
distinguished into original and actual sin, because it is all really actual, and 
there is, strictly speaking, no other sin but actual sin.<note n="190" id="iii.viii-p59.1"><p class="normal" id="iii.viii-p60">What has been <i>
meant</i> by this distinction may be agreeable to the truth, if by <i>actual sin</i> 
be meant the expression and acting out of the depravity or sinful disposition of 
the heart, in distinction from the sin of the heart, while not thus expressed. But 
the latter is as really <i>actual sin</i>, as the former. Therefore there is no 
ground for calling one actual sin, and the other not. Original sin is that total 
moral depravity, which takes place in the hearts of all the children of Adam, in 
consequence of his apostasy, which consists in exercise or act, as really as any 
sin can do, and therefore cannot be distinguished from actual sin.</p></note> As soon 
as sin exists in a child of Adam, though an infant, it consists in motion, or inclination, 
of the same nature and kind with sin in adult persons; all the difference is, the 
former is not so strong, and has not opportunity to be acted out, as the latter 
is. Sin, or an evil inclination, took place and existed in the heart of Adam, before 
he determined to eat, and did eat of the fruit which was forbidden. The very first 
motion in his heart, tending that way, was a sinful motion, though it was not perfected 
or completed till it produced the overt act. Who can say that this motion or inclination, 
which may be called lust, was stronger or had more activity in it, than the evil 
motion which may exist in the heart of an infant; which may be sufficient to produce 
the most horrid mental and external acts of sin, when capacity and opportunity are 
given? St. James says, “Every man is tempted, when he is drawn away of his own lust, 
and enticed. Then when lust hath conceived, it bringeth forth sin.” He does not 
mean that lust is not sin; for this is contrary to all reason, and cannot be true. 
And if we should suppose this to be asserted or implied, we should make this apostle 
contradict St. Paul, who says, “I had not known <i>sin</i> but by the law: For I 
had not known <i>lust</i>, except the law had said. Thou shalt not covet.” Here 
he speaks of <i>lust</i> and <i>sin</i>, as synonymous, by which he means one and 
the same thing. St. James, <pb n="277" id="iii.viii-Page_277" />when he distinguishes lust from sin, intends 
by the latter, what is called, <i>an overt act of sin</i>, or sin when it is finished 
or completed in overt acts, agreeable to the following expression. “Sin, when it 
is finished.” It is begun in the first and least motion of lust, or evil inclination 
and motion in the heart, and finished by being acted out in an overt act of the 
will. Both are <i>actual</i> sin, yet there is a distinction which maybe made.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.viii-p61">The existence of sin in the heart of a child, as soon as it is 
capable of any thing of a moral nature, can be as well accounted for, and as easily, 
as the sin of an adult person, or as the first existence of sin in the heart of 
Adam. The former being as consistent with the divine perfections, and the nature 
of man, as the latter. What has been said in the fourth chapter on the origin and 
cause of moral evil, may serve to illustrate this. And it takes place in the hearts 
of all the posterity of Adam, by virtue of the divine constitution, which has been 
considered and explained above.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.viii-p62">On the whole, it is presumed that none but those who assert that 
the sin of man does take place, contrary to the will and purpose of God, and that 
it is not, all things considered, agreeable to his will that it should exist, can 
have any objection to the doctrine of <i>original sin</i>, as it has been stated 
above, which asserts the universal sinfulness of Adam’s posterity, to be connected 
with his first sin by a just, wise and good constitution, made by God, when he created 
man. And of these, it is hoped, there are but few, since they must, by such assertion, 
contradict the truth plainly delivered in the holy scriptures, and deny the supremacy 
and absolute independence and infinite felicity of the Most High God; as has been 
observed in the forementioned chapter.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.viii-p63">In order to set this important scripture doctrine in a yet more 
full and clear light, the following things must be observed.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.viii-p64">I. Mankind are born <i>totally</i> corrupt or sinful, in consequence 
of the apostasy of Adam. That is, they have naturally, as the children of Adam, 
no degree or kind of moral rectitude, and their hearts are full of moral evil. That 
the first apostasy was total, and that man became immediately wholly sinful, having 
no degree of <pb n="278" id="iii.viii-Page_278" />moral rectitude, has been shewn to be, at least, probable, 
if not certain; and therefore when he begat a son in his own likeness, he must come 
into existence wholly sinful. But that this is in fact true of all mankind, is expressly 
and repeatedly asserted in divine revelation. It was early declared that “God saw 
that the wickedness of <i>man</i> was great in the earth, and that <i>every imagination 
of the thoughts of his heart was only evil continually</i>.”<note n="191" id="iii.viii-p64.1"><p class="normal" id="iii.viii-p65"><scripRef id="iii.viii-p65.1" passage="Gen. vi. 5" parsed="|Gen|6|5|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Gen.6.5">Gen. vi. 5</scripRef>.</p></note> 
The total corruption and depravity of mankind cannot be asserted in stronger and 
more decisive language than this. With reference to this assertion, it is said, 
“The imagination of man’s heart is evil from his youth.”<note n="192" id="iii.viii-p65.2"><p class="normal" id="iii.viii-p66"><scripRef passage="Gen 8:21" id="iii.viii-p66.1" parsed="|Gen|8|21|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Gen.8.21">
Chap. viii. 21</scripRef>.</p></note> 
Agreeable to this, Solomon says, “The heart of the sons of men (that is, of all 
mankind) <i>is full of evil</i>.<note n="193" id="iii.viii-p66.2"><p class="normal" id="iii.viii-p67"><scripRef id="iii.viii-p67.1" passage="Eccl. ix. 3" parsed="|Eccl|9|3|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Eccl.9.3">Eccl. ix. 3</scripRef>.</p></note> If it be <i>full</i> 
of evil, there can be no good in it. Again, it is said, “The heart is deceitful 
above all things, and <i>desperately wicked</i>.”<note n="194" id="iii.viii-p67.2"><p class="normal" id="iii.viii-p68"><scripRef id="iii.viii-p68.1" passage="Jer. xvii. 9" parsed="|Jer|17|9|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Jer.17.9">Jer. xvii. 9</scripRef>.</p></note> St. 
Paul asserts the total depravity of man, and that there is nothing in him naturally 
which is morally good and right, in very express and strong terms, repeated over 
and over again. He quotes the following words from the Old Testament, and expressly 
applies them to all mankind, both Jews and Gentiles. “There is <i>none</i> righteous,
<i>no, not one</i>. There is <i>none</i> that understandeth, there is <i>none</i> 
that seeketh after God. They are <i>all</i> gone out of the way, they are <i>together 
become unprofitable</i>, there is <i>none that doeth good, no, not one</i>. There 
is <i>no fear of God</i> before their eyes.”<note n="195" id="iii.viii-p68.2"><p class="normal" id="iii.viii-p69"><scripRef id="iii.viii-p69.1" passage="Romans iii. 10" parsed="|Rom|3|10|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Rom.3.10">Romans iii. 10</scripRef>, &amp;c.</p></note> This 
truth is implicitly asserted in many passages of scripture. Only a few will be mentioned, 
since it is so clearly asserted in what has been quoted. When Christ says, “That 
which is born of the flesh, is flesh,” that is, nothing but flesh, he really asserts 
that man, as he is born, in his natural state, is destitute of all moral goodness: 
For by <i>flesh</i> is meant that which is opposed to the holy Spirit, or holiness; 
and is put for moral corruption; which is abundantly evident by the writings of 
St. Paul. Christ says, “Him that cometh unto me, I will in no wise cast out.” 
All under the gospel are invited to come. “Whosoever will, let him come.” Yet Christ 
says, “No man can come unto <pb n="279" id="iii.viii-Page_279" />
me, except the Father, which sent me, draw him.” All this put together proves that 
all mankind are wholly opposed to the character of Christ, which they could not 
be, if they had the least degree of moral rectitude, or inclination to that which 
is right. Oar Lord further says, “Whosoever shall give you a cup of water 
to drink, in my name, because you belong to Christ, verily I say unto you, he shall 
not lose his reward.”<note n="196" id="iii.viii-p69.2"><p class="normal" id="iii.viii-p70"><scripRef id="iii.viii-p70.1" passage="Mark ix. 41" parsed="|Mark|9|41|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Mark.9.41">Mark ix. 41</scripRef>.</p></note> If he who exercises so much regard 
to Christ, as to give a cup of water for his sake, to one of his disciples, shall 
be saved; then men have not by nature the least inclination to embrace him, but 
must be his enemies, which indeed is abundantly declared, both by Christ and his 
apostles. “He that is not with me, <i>is against me</i>. Ye shall be hated of all 
men, for my name’s sake. If the world hate you, ye know that it hated me before 
it hated you.” By the world, is meant mankind in general. To <i>hate</i> Christ 
implies a mind not only destitute of all right disposition; but under the dominion 
of a strong evil propensity. St. Paul says, “The carnal mind is enmity against God. 
In me, that is, in my flesh, <i>dwelleth no good thing</i>.” The carnal mind and 
the flesh are the same, and stand opposed to the mind renewed by the Spirit of God 
in regeneration. It is said, “the natural man receiveth not the things of the Spirit 
of God: For they are foolishness unto him; neither can he know them, because they 
are spiritually discerned. But he that is spiritual, judgeth all things.” As the 
natural man is opposed to the spiritual man, that is, a true christian, it must 
mean man in his natural state in which he is born, or the world of mankind; which 
is confirmed by our Saviour’s saying the same which is here said of the natural 
man of mankind, as distinguished from his disciples. “I will pray the Father, and 
he shall give you another comforter, that he may abide with you forever; even the 
spirit of truth, <i>whom the world cannot receive, because it seeth him not, neither 
knoweth him</i>; but ye know him, for he dwelleth with you.”<note n="197" id="iii.viii-p70.2"><p class="normal" id="iii.viii-p71"><scripRef id="iii.viii-p71.1" passage="John xiv. 16" parsed="|John|14|16|0|0" osisRef="Bible:John.14.16">John xiv. 16</scripRef>, 
<scripRef passage="John 14:17" id="iii.viii-p71.2" parsed="|John|14|17|0|0" osisRef="Bible:John.14.17">17</scripRef>.</p></note> This represents man as not having the least degree of true taste and 
discerning of mind with respect to things of a moral, spiritual nature, which is 
the same with being destitute of all 
<pb n="280" id="iii.viii-Page_280" />moral rectitude, or holiness. Nothing but total depravity .can render 
men wholly blind to spiritual things, and so as to be opposed to them, and refuse 
to receive them. This is confirmed by what Christ says, “Except a man be born again, 
he <i>cannot see</i> the kingdom of God.”<note n="198" id="iii.viii-p71.3"><p class="normal" id="iii.viii-p72"><scripRef id="iii.viii-p72.1" passage="John iii. 3" parsed="|John|3|3|0|0" osisRef="Bible:John.3.3">John iii. 3</scripRef>.</p></note> 
He has no true discerning and understanding respecting it; but is wholly in the 
dark. Nothing but viciousness or depravity of mind can thus blind them; and a being 
destitute of every degree of conformity to the law of God, This is asserted by St. 
John, “Every one that <i>loveth</i>, is born of God, and <i>knoweth God</i>. 
He that <i>loveth not</i>, knoweth not God.”<note n="199" id="iii.viii-p72.2"><p class="normal" id="iii.viii-p73"><scripRef id="iii.viii-p73.1" passage="1 John iv. 7" parsed="|1John|4|7|0|0" osisRef="Bible:1John.4.7">1 John iv. 7</scripRef>, <scripRef passage="1 John 4:8" id="iii.viii-p73.2" parsed="|1John|4|8|0|0" osisRef="Bible:1John.4.8">8</scripRef>.</p></note> “Love is the fulfilling of the law,” which requires nothing but <span class="sc" id="iii.viii-p73.3">
love</span>. It is necessary to have <i>this love</i>, in order to see and know 
God. And consequently this is necessary in order to see the Spirit of God; for he 
is God; and in order to know the things of the Spirit of God, and see the kingdom 
of God. And he who has this love does know God, and receives the things of the Spirit. 
But all who are not born of God and saved by the washing of regeneration, and renewing 
of the Holy Ghost, are wholly without every degree of this kind of love; for every 
one that <i>loveth</i>, is born of God. Therefore all who are not born of God are 
wholly without every degree of conformity to the law of God, or of real holiness; 
consequently, are wholly depraved or sinful.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.viii-p74">This fact, the total depravity of mankind, is confirmed by experience 
and observation. Mankind have given this character of themselves, in all ages of 
the world, not only that they are sinners; but that there is none that doeth good, 
no, not one, unless he be renewed by divine grace, and is made a new creature, by 
being created in Christ Jesus, unto good works.<note n="200" id="iii.viii-p74.1"><p class="normal" id="iii.viii-p75">That those appearances and 
things which are found in mankind in general, which have been by some considered 
as true virtue and real goodness, and produced as an argument that mankind are not 
wholly depraved, are not true virtue, is proved in President Edwards’s Dissertation 
on the nature of true virtue.</p></note></p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.viii-p76">II. It is of importance to observe, That the total moral depravity 
and sinfulness of mankind, which by divine constitution takes place in consequence 
of the sin of their common father, is as much <i>their own sin</i>, and <pb n="281" id="iii.viii-Page_281" />
they are consequently as answerable and blameable for it, as if this their sinfulness 
had taken place in any other or different way that is conceivable or possible.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.viii-p77">Indeed, it is a plain contradiction to say, or suppose, that any 
person’s moral depravity or sin is not his own sill, and that all the blame and 
ill desert of it does not lie upon him; for if it be not <i>his sin</i>, and he 
is not answerable for it, it is not sin or moral depravity, but must be of a different 
and contrary nature, and consistent with innocence and moral perfection; and consequently 
cannot subject the person to any blame or desert of evil.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.viii-p78">Therefore to talk, or think, of the total or partial moral depravity 
of mankind, as not being wholly <i>their own</i> depravity or sin, and they not 
wholly accountable for it, and as if they are not odious and ill deserving in proportion 
to the degree of their moral corruption or sinfulness, is most absurd, and tends 
only to blind and delude.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.viii-p79">If the natural capacity and powers of mankind were debased and 
sunk, and become much less, and more feeble, independent of any moral depravity 
or sinfulness of theirs, this would not be their sin; nor could they be answerable 
or blamed for it. And if, in consequence of their being the children of Adam, and 
of his sin, they had lost their rational powers, and all natural capacity, necessary 
to constitute them moral agents; this could not render them sinful or blameable 
in the least degree; and, by the supposition, they would be utterly incapable of 
either. The constituted consequence and effect of the sin of Adam, as it respects 
his posterity, is their total moral depravity or sinfulness; and not the removal 
or debasing their natural powers of mind in the least degree, any farther than the 
corruption and sinfulness of their hearts has influence to prevent the proper use 
of their understanding, and natural powers of mind with which they are endowed; 
and they are by this moral depravity, perverted and improved to the purpose of sin 
and rebellion against God. Therefore nothing is necessary in order to restore man 
to the perfect possession of his natural powers, and the proper exercise and use 
of them, but the removal of the moral corruption of his heart, and restoration to 
the perfect exercise of holiness: Which moral corruption is in every instance and 
degree <pb n="282" id="iii.viii-Page_282" />
of it, wholly <i>his own</i> corruption and sin, in whose heart it takes place, 
and he is blameable and answerable for it all, be it more or less; and it is impossible 
it should be otherwise, as has been observed and proved. But as this matter is liable 
to be misunderstood, and many difficulties respecting it have much embarrassed the 
minds of not a few, it is proper to give it a more particular attention.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.viii-p80">1. The sinfulness of mankind being connected with the sin of Adam, 
as the constituted consequence of it, does not in any respect, or in the least degree, 
make it less their own sin, or render them the less answerable and blameworthy for 
it.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.viii-p81">The previous certainty that they will all sin, however, and in 
whatever way this becomes certain, whether by the divine decree, or constitution, 
or whatever, cannot render it less their own sin, or them less guilty, than if there 
were no certainty that they would sin antecedent to their actually sinning. This 
has been considered and proved in a former chapter, and cannot be consistently denied 
by any who admit the foreknowledge of God, and believe in divine revelation. If 
the previous certainty that men will act wrong, and sin, renders their conduct not 
wrong and sinful, which is indeed a contradiction; then, according to the Bible, 
neither Pharaoh, nor the Israelites, nor Judas, nor the Jews in crucifying Christ, 
were guilty of any sin; and others innumerable, whose actions were predicted in 
holy writ. Yea, according to this, there is, there can be, no sin in the universe, 
since all the actions of creatures were foreknown and therefore certain from eternity. 
It was certain that Adam would sin before he was a sinner. This did not render his 
transgression, no sin, or not his own sin, or in the least exculpate him for what 
he did: So far from this, that it necessarily implied, that he would be a sinner, 
and that he should be wholly answerable for that which was his own sin. And if the 
sinfulness of all the posterity of Adam w as certainly connected with his sinning, 
this does not make them sinners, before they actually are sinners; and when they 
actually become sinners, they themselves are the sinners, it is their own sin, and 
they are as blameable and guilty as if Adam had never sinned, <pb n="283" id="iii.viii-Page_283" />
and each one were the first sinner that ever existed. The children of Adam are not 
answerable for his sin, and it is not their sin any farther than they approve of 
it, by sinning as he did: In this way only they become guilty of his sin, viz. by 
approving of what he did, and joining with him in rebellion. And it being previously 
certain by divine constitution, that all mankind would thus sin, and join with their 
common head in rebellion, renders it no less their own sin and crime, than if this 
certainty had taken place on any other ground, or in any other way; or than if there 
had been no certainty that they would thus all sin, were this possible.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.viii-p82">2. The moral corruption or sin of mankind, is not the less their 
own sin and crime, because they begin to sin so early, and are morally depraved 
as soon as they exist, capable of any thing of a moral nature. It is evident from 
scripture and from fact, as has been shown, that this is true of all the children 
of Adam. They are sinful as soon as they are capable subjects of any thing of a 
moral kind, and their first moral exercises are wrong and sinful: But nevertheless, 
it is their own depravity, and all their moral exercises are as much their own, 
and this corruption and these exercises are as really criminal, as they could be, 
did they not take place so soon; but in any supposeable aftertime. The time in which 
a person begins to have moral exercises, right or wrong, whether earlier or later, 
does not alter the nature of those exercises. If his exercises be wrong and selfish, 
from the beginning of his existence, they are in their own nature as really wrong 
and sinful, as if he had been holy a thousand years, and after that had fallen into 
a course of the same wrong and sinful exercises and conduct. It is not necessary, 
in order to a creature’s being sinful, that he should first be virtuous, or free 
from moral corruption. The first sin of Adam would have been as really his own sin, 
and his own crime, had he sinned sooner than he did; yea, if that had been the first 
act of his, and he had never had one virtuous exercise: His previous holy exercises 
might be the means of rendering his sin which he afterwards committed, <i>more criminal</i> 
than otherwise it would have been; but had there been no such holy exercises previous 
to his sin, and his <pb n="284" id="iii.viii-Page_284" />first exercises had been contrary to holiness, 
they would have been as much his own exercises, and as <i>really</i> criminal, as 
was his first sin, which he committed after he had been holy for a time. The plain, 
incontestible reason has been given for this, viz. That all sin consists in the 
nature and quality of the exercises which take place in a moral agent, and not in 
any thing which goes before, or follows after them, and which is not of the same 
kind.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.viii-p83">If a person finds himself <i>now</i> a sinner, and that from the 
heart he approves of, and chooses rebellion against God and his laws, he is not 
the less a sinner, because he has been of the same disposition many years, and has 
always sinned, since he has been conscious of any of his own exercises; yea, has 
in fact had the same disposition, from the beginning of his existence. His having 
sinned <i>before</i>, and done nothing else but sin, since he began to act, is no 
excuse for his sinning <i>now</i>, and going on to sin, nor does it make his present 
sinful exercises less his own sin, nor any of the precedent ones, than if he never 
had such exercises more than at one time of his life. Yea, according to the common 
sense of mankind, he is the more criminal, and his character is the worse and more 
odious, for his being always given to wickedness, and to do evil, from a child; 
so that it is natural, or in his very nature, to do evil. It has been often said 
of persons, in order to represent them very criminal, and set their character in 
a bad and odious light, “Their conduct has been <i>always</i> bad and mischievous, 
their character has been bad from children, they sprang from very wicked families; 
they are vicious <i>by nature</i>; and mischievousness runs in their very blood, 
&amp;c.”</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.viii-p84">King David represents himself in this light, and speaks of his 
native corruption as his own, and as an aggravation of all his sins, and the odiousness 
of his own character, in that remarkable penitential psalm of his,<note n="201" id="iii.viii-p84.1"><p class="normal" id="iii.viii-p85"><scripRef passage="Ps 51:1-19" id="iii.viii-p85.1" parsed="|Ps|51|1|51|19" osisRef="Bible:Ps.51.1-Ps.51.19">
Psalm li.</scripRef></p></note> “Behold I was shapen in iniquity, and in sin did my 
mother conceive me.”</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.viii-p86">It is not necessary to determine when or how soon the children 
of Adam became moral agents, or what is necessary to constitute them such, in order 
to decide the <pb n="285" id="iii.viii-Page_285" />point now under consideration; since it is only asserted 
that the moral corruption of mankind, is not the less their own sin and fault, because 
it takes place <i>as soon as they are capable of moral exercise</i>, be that when 
it may. Many have supposed that none of mankind are capable of sin or moral agency, 
before they can distinguish between right and wrong, and know what the law of God 
requires, and what it forbids: But this wants proof, which never has been yet produced. 
And it appears to be contrary to Divine Revelation: For that speaks of sins committed 
ignorantly, and supposes a person may sin and be guilty in those exercises, and 
that conduct, in which he has no knowledge or consciousness that he is doing wrong. 
Hence it appears, that persons may be moral agents, and sin without knowing what 
the law of God is, or of what nature their exercises are; and while they have no 
consciousness that they are wrong. And if so, then as soon as children are capable 
of the least motion and exercise of the heart, which is contrary to the law of God, 
such motions and exercises are sin in them, and their sin, though they are ignorant 
of it: And of such sinful inclinations and exercises, they may be capable as soon 
as they exist the children of Adam. It is certain no one can know it not to be so: 
And this is agreeable to the representation the scripture gives of the matter, which 
puts it beyond all doubt. This has been particularly considered, page 273, &amp;c.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.viii-p87">3. The corruption of mankind is not the less their own moral depravity 
and sin, and they are not the less culpable and guilty, because it is so deeply 
fixed in their hearts, and they are totally corrupt and sinful.—This observation 
might be thought quite needless, and as only saying, that a greater degree of sinfulness 
is not less than a small degree; or that ten or a thousand degrees of moral corruption 
are not less than one degree; or that sin is not the less sinful, because it is 
so great. I say, this observation would be needless and but trifling, were it not 
too common to believe and assert the contrary, though not in plain and express terms; 
however unreasonable and absurd.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.viii-p88">If one degree of sinfulness, or opposition of heart to the law 
of God in any person, be wholly his own sin, <pb n="286" id="iii.viii-Page_286" />and he is justly accountable 
for it, and the blame and guilt of it lies upon him; then, if he has ten, or a thousand 
degrees of evil inclination and opposition to the law of God; this must be all still 
his own sin, and he proportionably more criminal and blameworthy. If inclination 
to oppose the law of God be wrong and criminal; then it must be criminal in proportion 
to the strength of such inclination. And if this be the constant reigning inclination 
and choice of his heart, so as wholly to exclude every degree of opposite inclination 
and choice, he is wholly sinful, and criminal in proportion to the strength and 
constancy of his evil disposition, by which his heart is obstinately fixed and bent 
to do evil. This is the clear dictate of reason, and the contrary is most absurd, 
and supposes that the more strongly the heart is inclined to oppose God and his 
law, the less criminal the man is; and that when the heart is wholly and constantly 
fixed in opposition to the law of God, this opposition of heart to God becomes wholly 
innocent, so that a man cannot be justly condemned for it; whereas if he had less 
opposition to God, and a very small degree of it, it would be very odious and sinful! 
That the greatest possible degree of moral corruption does not excuse, but increase 
the odiousness and guilt of the man so depraved, is not only demonstrable by reason, 
but is the dictate of common sense, and feelings of mankind. If a person appears 
wholly and constantly inclined to falsehood, and to injure his neighbours; and if 
no means and arguments used with him, or motives set before him to desist from his 
evil conduct, have the least impression or effect upon him, to reclaim him; but 
he obstinately persists in his evil practices, we consider him not as innocent and 
blameless, because his moral depravity is so deeply fixed that he is incurable by 
any possible means; but as more odious and criminal in proportion to the degree 
and obstinacy of his incurable and unalterable inclination to do evil.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.viii-p89">It has been thought and urged by many, that fallen man cannot 
be wholly blameable for his moral depravity, because he has <i>lost his power</i> 
to do that which is good, and is wholly <i>unable</i> to change and renew his depraved 
heart. But what has been before observed, must be <pb n="287" id="iii.viii-Page_287" />here kept in mind, 
that man has not lost any of his natural powers of understanding and will, &amp;:c. 
by becoming sinful. He has lost his inclination, or is wholly without any inclination 
to serve and obey his Maker, and entirely opposed to it. In this his sinfulness 
consists; and in this lies his blame and guilt, and in nothing else; and the stronger 
and more fixed the opposition to the law of God is, and the farther he is from any 
inclination to obey, the more blameable and inexcusable he is, as has been observed 
and proved. So that when it is considered what must be meant by man’s losing his 
power, and having no ability to do right, if there be any real meaning, and any 
thing be meant that is agreeable to the truth, the objection and difficulty vanishes 
entirely; and it appears that man is under no inability to obey the law of God, 
but what consists in his inclination to disobey. And it is easy to see that if inclination 
to disobey God, be it ever so strong, will excuse disobedience, and render it blameless; 
then there cannot possibly be any such thing as sin and blame in the universe; unless 
creatures may commit sin contrary to all their inclination and choice.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.viii-p90">It is certain that every degree of inclination contrary to duty, 
which is and must be sinful, necessarily implies and involves an equal degree of 
difficulty, and inability to obey. For indeed, such inclination of the heart to 
disobey, and the difficulty or inability to obey, are precisely one and the same. 
This kind of difficulty or inability, therefore, always is great according to the 
strength and fixedness of the inclination to disobey; and it becomes total and absolute 
when the heart is totally corrupt, and wholly opposed to obedience. But this inability 
to obey, being, the same in kind and degree with opposition of heart to obedience, 
does not excuse disobedience, or in the least remove the blame of it, unless opposition 
of heart to obedience renders disobedience no crime: Which none, it is presumed, 
will assert or believe.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.viii-p91">This leads to observe, that the holy scriptures speak frequently 
of this kind of inability, or want of power to do good; and always represent it 
as inexcusable and blameable. Our Saviour said. “No man can come to <pb n="288" id="iii.viii-Page_288" />
me, except the Father, which hath sent me, draw him.” And yet apparently blamed 
the Jews for rejecting, and not coming to him, and said to them, “Ye will 
not come to me, that you might have life.” From whence it appears that the <i>cannot</i>, 
the inability mankind are under to come to him, is precisely the same thing with 
their unwillingness, or opposition of heart to come to him, as the matter has been 
stated above. Nothing but the opposition of the heart, or will of man, to coming 
to Christ, is, or can be in the way of his coming. So long as this continues, and 
his heart is wholly opposed to Christ, he cannot come to him, it is impossible, 
and will continue so, until his unwillingness, his opposition to coming to Christ, 
be removed by a change and renovation of his heart by divine grace, and he made
<i>willing</i> in the day of God’s power. And yet this inability, and impossibility 
to come to Christ, consisting wholly in the opposition of his will or heart to Christ, 
is the man’s own sin, and he is criminal in proportion to the degree of his inability, 
or the strength and fixedness of the opposition of his heart to Christ.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.viii-p92">This kind of inability, therefore, is so far from being an excuse 
for not coming to Christ, that it is in its own nature criminal, being nothing but 
sin, a strong fixed opposition of heart to that which is most reasonable and right. 
No man can act contrary to his present inclination and choice. But whoever imagined 
that this rendered his inclination and choice innocent and blameless, however wrong 
and unreasonable it might be?</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.viii-p93">St. Paul says, “the carnal mind is enmity against God, for 
it is not subject to the law of God, <i>neither indeed can be</i>.” None can think 
the Apostle means to excuse man’s enmity against God, because it renders him unable 
to obey the law of God, and cannot be subject to it. The contrary is strongly expressed, 
viz. that this enmity against God is exceeding criminal, in that it is directly 
opposed to God and his law, and involves in its nature an utter inability to obey 
the law of God; yea, an absolute impossibility.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.viii-p94">On the whole, it is hoped that by what has been said above on 
the apostasy of man, it will appear that the doctrine of original sin has been stated 
and explained agreeable <pb n="289" id="iii.viii-Page_289" />to the holy scripture; and that it does not 
imply any thing unreasonable and absurd, or injurious to mankind; but is the result 
of a constitution which is perfectly agreeable to the nature of things, reasonable, 
wise and good; that the children of Adam are not guilty of his sin, are not punished, 
and do not suffer for that, any farther than they implicitly or expressly approve 
of his transgression, by sinning as he did: And that their total moral corruption 
and sinfulness is as much their own sin, and as criminal in them, as it could be 
if it were not in consequence of the sin of the first father of the human race, 
or if Adam had not first sinned: And that they are under no inability to obey the 
law of God, which does not consist in their sinfulness and opposition of heart to 
the will of God: Therefore are wholly inexcusable, and may justly suffer the wages 
of sin, which is the <i>second death</i>,</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.viii-p95">III. This subject of the introduction of sin into the world, and 
the total moral corruption of all the natural posterity of Adam, cannot be properly 
finished without observing, and more particularly considering, <i>what is the nature 
of </i><span class="sc" id="iii.viii-p95.1">sin</span>, and wherein it consists.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.viii-p96">The most express and concise definition of sin, which, perhaps, 
we have in the Bible, is in the following words, “Sin is the transgression of the 
law.” Or, as it might perhaps more properly be rendered. Sin is a <i>violation</i> 
of the law; or a <i>deviation</i> from law. Sin supposes a law; “For where no law 
is, there is no transgression.” And every motion or exercise of the heart of a moral 
agent, which is not perfectly conformed to the law of God, which requires all love 
to God with all their heart, soul, mind, and strength, and to love their neighbour 
as themselves, is sin, as it is a deviation from this law. As the law requires love, 
and nothing but <i>love</i>, it may be determined with great certainty that sin 
consists in that which is contrary to that love which the law requires, be it what 
it may. There can be no neutral moral exercises, which are neither conformable to 
the law of God, nor contrary to it; therefore every exercise of the heart of a moral 
agent, which is not agreeable to the law of God, is contrary and opposed to it. 
It must be also observed, and kept in mind, that sin. as does holiness, <pb n="290" id="iii.viii-Page_290" />
consists in the motions or exercises of the heart or will, and in nothing else. 
Where there is no exercises of heart, nothing of the nature of moral inclination, 
will or choice, there can be neither sin nor holiness. Nothing external or out of 
the heart, or will, and which has no connection with that, can be of the nature 
of morality, either virtue or sin: External motions or exertions, in words and actions, 
are virtuous or sinful, only as they are connected with the heart, and are the expressions, 
fruits or effects of inclination, design and choice; and all the virtue or sin consists 
wholly in the latter. This observation, the truth of which none can dispute, is 
made in order to direct us where to look for sin, even into the heart, and no where 
else; when we are inquiring after the nature of it, and wherein it consists.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.viii-p97">Therefore if we would find what sin is, and what is that in which 
it consists, we must look for these exercises of heart, that disposition, inclination 
or choice, in which there is no love to God and our neighbour; and which are contrary 
to loving God with <i>all the heart</i>, and our neighbour as ourselves. And if 
we can find, and on sure ground determine, what these are, we shall know what is 
the nature of sin, and wherein it essentially consists.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.viii-p98">Love to God, and love to our fellow creatures, is of the same 
nature and kind, and differs only as it is exercised towards different objects. 
It consists most essentially in benevolence or good w ill to being in general: In 
this is necessarily included all virtuous love, or all the love which the law of 
God requires, such as love of complacency in moral beauty and excellence, and love 
of gratitude to benevolent beings, &amp;c. Love to God, who is infinitely the greatest, 
and the sum of all being, consists primarily and essentially in good will or friendship 
of heart towards him, in acquiescing and rejoicing in his existence, glory, and 
infinite felicity, and in seeking the promotion of his interest and honour, &amp;c. 
And this implies all the virtuous love required in the divine law: And where there 
is no degree of this kind, disinterested affection, there is no virtuous love to 
God or man. If this were not so evident from the nature of things, it is capable 
of being proved from scripture many ways. <pb n="291" id="iii.viii-Page_291" />
The apostle John says, “God is love.” And then proceeds immediately to say, “In 
this was manifested the love of God towards us, because that God sent his only begotten 
Son into the world, that we might live through him.” This is love of pure, disinterested 
benevolence, to creatures infinitely odious and guilty. This is the love meant when 
he said, “God is love;” for this is introduced to illustrate that assertion. 
Hence it follows with certainty, that disinterested benevolence is primary and essential 
in the divine moral character. Consequently, this is the love which is required 
of creatures in the divine law: For the law of God is a transcript of his own moral 
perfection; and so far as creatures are conformed to this, they are like God in 
his moral character, and partakers of the divine nature; and exercise the same kind 
of love and holiness which forms the moral character of God. St. Paul gives a particular 
description of the love in which holiness consists;<note n="202" id="iii.viii-p98.1"><p class="normal" id="iii.viii-p99"><scripRef passage="1Cor 13:4" id="iii.viii-p99.1" parsed="|1Cor|13|4|0|0" osisRef="Bible:1Cor.13.4">
1 Cor. xiii.</scripRef></p></note> and he says, “It is <i>kind</i>,” that is, it is 
benevolent, and good will to others, consequently to being in general, and to God, 
the first and sum of all being. He also says, “It seeketh not her own,” by which 
assertion he sets it in direct opposition to self love, for in the exercise of this 
a man seeketh his own, and nothing else; and he makes it wholly a disinterested 
affection; for if holy love seeketh not her own, it seeketh the good of being in 
general, as her only object, and cannot have the least degree of selfishness in 
its nature; but is directly opposed to it.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.viii-p100">That the love to our fellow creatures required in the law of God, 
is love of benevolence, which is disinterested, is certain, as it is a love which 
will extend to those who have no moral excellence, even those of the worst moral 
character, and to our greatest enemies, towards whom a virtuous love either of complacence 
or gratitude cannot be exercised. And it follows from this also, that the love to 
God which is required, is love of disinterested benevolence: for, as has been observed, 
the love to God, and to our neighbour, which the law of God requires, is of the 
same nature and kind, and the one implies and involves the other. And this is the 
farther <pb n="292" id="iii.viii-Page_292" />evident and certain, from the apostle’s considering the love 
of christians, as of the same nature and kind with this disinterested love of God, 
in this passage; and from his exhorting them to imitate God in this his disinterested 
benevolence, by <i>loving</i> as he does. “Beloved, if God <i>so loved us</i>, we 
ought also to love one another. If we love one another, <i>God dwelleth in us, and 
his love is perfected in us</i>.”</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.viii-p101">It being thus evident that the love required in the divine law, 
in which holiness consists, is disinterested benevolence, which is primary and most 
essential in all virtuous love; and in which all is included; it appears from what 
has been observed, that sin consists in that affection and those exercises, which 
are directly opposed to disinterested benevolence to being in general, and all those 
affections and exercises which are implied in true benevolence or good will to others. 
And this must be self love, or selfish affection and exercises; for this, and this 
only is, or can be opposed to disinterested regard and good will to other beings; 
and to all those exercises which are implied in true benevolence. If a person has 
no other exercises but <i>self love</i>, or the love of his own self, and those 
moral inclinations and affections which are implied in this, he does by the supposition 
regard himself only, and has respect to nothing but his own supposed good or interest; 
and cannot exercise the least degree of disinterested affection to any other being. 
And as that heart whose exercises may be all resolved into self love, being implied 
in it, and flowing from it, does not, and cannot exercise any true benevolence to 
other beings, but is wholly opposed to it; so every degree of self love, be there 
more or less, is in its own nature opposed to the love required in the divine law: 
And therefore is in its nature, and in every degree of it, sin, being contrary to 
true holiness. And if a person be not wholly selfish, but exercises some degree 
of disinterested regard and good will to other beings; yet every degree of self 
love which he exercises is as opposite to disinterested affection, as if he had 
no benevolence; and therefore as sinful. The nature of self love is not changed 
from sin to holiness, nor does it become an innocent affection, by the exercise 
of a degree <pb n="293" id="iii.viii-Page_293" />of opposite disinterested affection, or by being diminished, 
as to the degree of it, so as to be exerted with less strength and vigour, and in 
a measure counteracted by opposite affection. Still every exertion of self love 
is as really sin, as if it were exercised in a higher degree, and were not restrained 
and counteracted by opposite, disinterested love. No one does or can suppose that 
benevolent affection changes its nature, and becomes wrong and sinful, by being 
exercised in a low degree, and counteracted, and kept very much under by selfishness: 
But this might be as reasonably supposed, as that selfishness does become innocent 
and virtuous, when exercised in a small degree, and under the restraints of benevolence 
to being in general. Yea, if the latter be true or possible, the former must be 
so too.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.viii-p102">Hence it is evident, that sin consists in sell love, and those 
affections and exercises which are implied in this, and naturally flow from it as 
their root. This is in its own nature opposite to all virtuous, holy affection, 
to all truth and reason; and is of a criminal nature, in every degree of it, wherever 
it is found; and where there is nothing of this, there is nothing criminal or wrong. 
Self love pays a supreme and sole regard to an infinitely small and inconsiderable 
part of existence, and the feeling and language of all the exercises of it is, “I 
am, and there is none else! There is no other being worthy of any regard, but <i>
myself</i>.” “Self love regards nothing but self, as such, and subordinates every 
being and every thing to this; and opposes every thing which, in the view of the 
selfish person, opposes him, and his selfish interest. He who is under the government 
of this affection, takes all to himself, and gives nothing to any other being, as 
if he was the greatest, the best, and only worthy and important being in the universe.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.viii-p103">Self love is the root of all pride; or rather is pride itself, 
as there is no distinction to be made of which there can be any conception. Pride 
is self love exercised in self esteem, and desire to exalt self, &amp;:c. Self love 
is blindness and delusion itself, as it is a contradiction to all truth; and is 
the source of all the blindness and delusions with respect to things temporal and 
spiritual, which have or can ever take place. This sets man <pb n="294" id="iii.viii-Page_294" />
against God, and his fellow creatures, and against himself, that is, against his 
true interest, and renders him really miserable; and prepares him to be completely 
miserable forever, unless it be removed. In short, there can be no kind or degree 
of moral depravity which has appeared among men, or of which there can be any conception, 
which does not consist in self love, in the various exercises and fruits of it: 
And where there is no selfishness, there is no sin, there can be no deviation from 
the law of God.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.viii-p104">Therefore when the apostle Paul speaks of the nature of sin, and 
that in which he found it to consist when he came to the knowledge of it, he comprehends 
it all in selfishness, or <i>coveting</i>, which is the same. He says, “I had not 
known <i>sin</i>, but by the law: For I had not known lust, except the law had said.
<i>Thou shalt not </i><span class="sc" id="iii.viii-p104.1">covet</span>.” He refers to the tenth command 
in the decalogue, “Thou shalt not <i>covet</i> thy neighbour’s house, &amp;c. 
nor any thing that is thy neighbour’s.” Coveting that to ourselves, which belongs 
to others, is an exercise of self love. In this the apostle represents sin to consist; 
even in the inmost latent exercises of this selfishness in the heart, being the 
root and fountain of all sin. Agreeable to this, the same apostle, when he describes 
the great degree of vice and wickedness which shall take place in the last days, 
sets <i>self love</i> at the head, as the source and root of the whole. “This 
know also, that in the last days perilous times shall come. For men shall be <i>
lovers of their own selves</i>; covetous, boasters, proud, &amp;:c.”<note n="203" id="iii.viii-p104.2"><p class="normal" id="iii.viii-p105"><scripRef id="iii.viii-p105.1" passage="2 Timothy iii. 1-5" parsed="|2Tim|3|1|3|5" osisRef="Bible:2Tim.3.1-2Tim.3.5">2 Timothy 
iii. 1-5</scripRef>.</p></note> Any one who will attentively read over this catalogue of iniquity, 
will see, that every vice here mentioned, is implied in the self love which is first 
introduced, and is only a different modification of that which men will practise
<i>because</i> they are <i>lovers of their own selves</i>: and consequently act 
out this self love in a variety of forms, which therefore are called by these different 
names.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.viii-p106">It therefore appears, that as holiness is, in the holy scripture, 
reduced to one simple principle, <span class="sc" id="iii.viii-p106.1">love</span>, and made to consist 
wholly in this, by which is evidently meant disinterested good will to being in 
general, capable <pb n="295" id="iii.viii-Page_295" />
of happiness, with all that affection necessarily included in this; so sin is there 
represented as consisting in the simple principle or exercise of
<span class="sc" id="iii.viii-p106.2">self love</span>, which, in its own nature, comprehends all sin, 
every exercise and affection which is a deviation from the divine law; and is directly 
and wholly opposed to that love which this law requires.<note n="204" id="iii.viii-p106.3"><p class="normal" id="iii.viii-p107">Our Lord says, all 
which the law requires is love, therefore holiness consisted wholly in this (<scripRef id="iii.viii-p107.1" passage="Matt. xxii. 37-40" parsed="|Matt|22|37|22|40" osisRef="Bible:Matt.22.37-Matt.22.40">Matt. 
xxii. 37-40</scripRef>) And St. Paul says, “He that loveth another hath fulfilled the law; 
therefore <i>love</i> is the fulfilling of the law.” (<scripRef id="iii.viii-p107.2" passage="Rom. 13" parsed="|Rom|13|0|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Rom.13">Rom. 13</scripRef> ) And, as has been 
observed, he represents sin as consisting in the <i>coveting</i> what belongs to 
others, which is forbidden in the tenth command; which is <i>self love</i>. The 
love required, gives all to being in general, and reserves and desires nothing to 
self, as self, or as an object distinct from universal being. The <i>self</i> love 
forbidden, covets and seeks all to self, as such, as distinguished from being in 
general, and opposite to it. It gives nothing to any other being, but, so far as 
its grasp can reach, takes and holds all good to <i>self</i>, as such, and as opposed 
to every other being; and seeks to subordinate every other being and thing to his 
own self, will and interest. The former is required as that in which all holiness 
consists. The latter is forbidden, as the root and essence of all sin.</p></note></p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.viii-p108">It has been said, that every degree of self love cannot be sin, 
but must be lawful and right, since it is reasonable that we should have some regard, 
at least, for ourselves, and desire and seek our own interest and happiness, not 
inconsistent with that of others; and were there no self love, men could not be 
influenced by promises and threatening; and there would be no propriety in these, 
of which the Bible is full. Besides, the command to love our neighbour supposes 
and enjoins self love. “Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself.” Here the love 
of our own selves is mentioned as the stated measure, by which our love to others 
is to be regulated. If we are forbid to exercise any degree of self love, the command 
is inconsistent, and comes to nothing.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.viii-p109">Upon this it may be observed, that a person may have and exercise 
a proper regard for himself, and desire and seek his own interest and happiness, 
without the least degree of the self love which is opposed to disinterested benevolence, 
or which is not implied in it. The person who exercises disinterested good will 
to being in general must have a proper and proportionable regard to himself; as 
he belongs to being in general, and is included in it, as a necessary part of it. 
It is impossible he <pb n="296" id="iii.viii-Page_296" />
should love being in general, or universal being, and not love himself; because 
he is included in universal being. And the more he has of a disinterested, universal 
benevolence, and the stronger his exercises of it are, the more regard will he have 
to his own being, and the more fervently will he desire and seek his own interest 
and happiness. But here it must be observed, that he will not desire and seek it
<i>as his own</i>, or because it is his <i>own interest</i>, considered as distinct 
and detached from the interest of the whole, or of being in general; but as included 
in it. Thus disinterested benevolence to being in general loves our neighbour <i>
as ourselves</i>; in which there is nothing <i>selfish</i>, but ourselves are loved 
as included in the general object of disinterested love. The least degree of selfish 
love necessarily destroys all due proportion, and sets up a selfish interest detached 
from that of others, and injurious to the whole. It is in the very nature of it 
an enemy to the harmony and happiness of the whole, and breaks in upon it, and tends 
to spread confusion and evil through the whole, in opposition to universal benevolence; 
and is inconsistent with our loving our neighbour <i>as</i> ourselves; but, by the 
supposition, loves <i>self</i> and nothing else. Hence it appears that the command, 
“Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself,” excludes and forbids all self love, 
or selfishness, and enjoins that disinterested love to the whole, which necessarily 
includes a proper and proportionable love and regard to our own existence and interest, 
as implied in that of the whole. And in this view of the matter, it appears that 
he who has disinterested benevolence to the whole may be influenced by promises 
and threatenings, and is as proper a subject of them, and more so, than the most 
selfish person in the world.<note n="205" id="iii.viii-p109.1"><p class="normal" id="iii.viii-p110">This subject is more particularly considered 
in “An Inquiry into the Nature of True Holiness,” published in the year 1773, and 
reprinted at New-York, in the year 1791 To which the reader is referred, who shall 
desire to see it more fully discussed.</p></note></p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.viii-p111">Thus it appears from scripture, and the reason and nature of things, 
that the sin which entered into the world by one man, the father of the human race, 
and has spread to all his children, by which they are totally corrupted, <pb n="297" id="iii.viii-Page_297" />
and involved in guilt and ruin, consists wholly in <i>self love</i>. Nothing but 
that which has the nature of selfishness is sin; and this is in its own nature, 
and in every degree, a transgression of the law of God, and contrary to true holiness. 
It is useful and important that we should have this scriptural idea of holiness 
and sin, as it will put us under advantage to know how far we ourselves are sinful, 
or what is sin in us, as well as to judge of the moral corruption of mankind.</p>
<h2 id="iii.viii-p111.1">IMPROVEMENT.</h2>
<p class="normal" id="iii.viii-p112">I. IN the part the devil acted in seducing man, and leading him 
off into rebellion against God, may be seen the nature and tendency of sin, and 
what is the disposition or inclination of the sinner. When Satan became a rebel 
against his Maker, his inclination and desire was to disappoint and dethrone him, 
if possible, and to spread rebellion through the universe; and he wished to have 
every creature that existed, or ever should exist, to join with him, and do as he 
had done: And his sinning had a mighty tendency to this, and did accomplish it, 
so far as his influence reached, and had its natural effect. He actually drew off 
into rebellion with him myriads of angels. And had it been in his power, and had 
not God prevented it, he would have drawn them all off from obedience to God. He 
wished to extinguish all holiness from the universe. He acted out this disposition, 
this enmity against God and man, and all holiness, in seducing man, and spreading 
sin and ruin through this world.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.viii-p113">Sin in man is of the same nature and kind with the sin of the 
devil, by which man is inclined to do as he does, and in which man has joined with 
him, to desire and pursue the same thing which he seeks; and it tends to produce 
the same effects, the sin and ruin of the whole universe. Therefore our Saviour 
says to the Jews, “Ye are of your father, the devil, <i>and the lusts of your father 
ye will do</i>.”<note n="206" id="iii.viii-p113.1"><p class="normal" id="iii.viii-p114"><scripRef id="iii.viii-p114.1" passage="John viii. 41" parsed="|John|8|41|0|0" osisRef="Bible:John.8.41">John viii. 41</scripRef>.</p></note> That is, ye are of the same 
<pb n="298" id="iii.viii-Page_298" />disposition with the devil, and desire and pursue the same things. 
“He that committeth sin is of the devil.”<note n="207" id="iii.viii-p114.2"><p class="normal" id="iii.viii-p115"><scripRef id="iii.viii-p115.1" passage="1 John iii. 8" parsed="|1John|3|8|0|0" osisRef="Bible:1John.3.8">1 John iii. 8</scripRef>.</p></note> 
Here we are to look to see the nature and tendency of sin, when acted out, and the 
inclination and choice of the sinner; and to learn our own character as sinners, 
in which we imitate the devil, and exercise the same desires and lusts of self-love 
and pride, in which his first rebellion consisted; and in which consists his obstinate 
perseverance in disobedience, and all his attempts against God and man. This, if 
properly considered, will lead us to view ourselves, and the character of mankind, 
in a much worse light than that in which men generally view themselves; and will 
serve to discover the infinite evil of all sin, as tending, and desiring and attempting, 
to spread unbounded mischief, and infinite natural evil through the universe. The 
consequence is, that the sinner deserves to be punished with infinite evil, or everlasting 
destruction.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.viii-p116">Doubtless one reason why it was so ordered that <i>one</i>, the 
first act of sin, should spread total corruption and ruin over all the countless 
myriads of the human race, was to discover to all intelligent creatures the evil 
nature and tendency of sin. This constitution, as has been observed, was only ordaining 
that sin should, in this respect, have its natural course, and spread, agreeable 
to the inclination and desire of the first transgressor, through all his posterity; 
And hereby the evil there is in every act of sin, is held up to the view of men 
and angels, discovering to all that it deserves the endless punishment threatened 
in the divine law.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.viii-p117">Let no one then condemn Satan for his rebellion and persisting 
in sinning, while he justifies himself, or even thinks better of himself, who is 
doing the same thing, and rendering himself like the devil, and joining with him, 
and justifying him, by every act of sin of which he is guilty. Nor let any of the 
children of Adam object to the constitution which connects their sin with his; nor 
complain of the sin of their common father, while they are disposed to excuse and 
justify themselves in that conduct by which they consent to his sinning as he did, 
and imitate him, and desire to spread sin and ruin as far as <pb n="299" id="iii.viii-Page_299" />
he has done, and would do it, were it in their power; and which they are attempting 
to do, even in making the objection. Rather let all condemn, and humble themselves 
in the sight of the Lord, for their joining with Satan in rebellion, and imitating 
and justifying Adam in his transgression, and doing what they could to spread and 
perpetuate disobedience. And let all adore and give glory to almighty power, infinite 
wisdom and goodness to that glorious Being, who does in any degree counteract sin 
and the sinner; and in any instance prevent the just and natural consequences of 
it; and turn all to his own glory, and the greatest good of his kingdom.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.viii-p118">II. From the history of the apostasy of man, and the way in which 
sin entered into the world, we are warned of the folly and danger of disregarding 
divine revelation, and giving the least heed to any assertions or suggestions which 
are contrary to the revealed will of God, or which are not warranted by that.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.viii-p119">The first suggestion which Satan made was contrary to that which 
God had declared; and by giving heed to that, sin was introduced, and has brought 
sin and ruin on all mankind. And this same deceiver and father of lies has at all 
times since, and does now, in various ways, attempt to lead men to disregard what 
God has said in his word, and believe those things which are not warranted by it, 
but are really contrary to those divine oracles. And so far as he succeeds, he gets 
the advantage of men; and in this way they fall into his snare, and are led captive 
by him. This is the continued source of all the sinful practices in the world, and 
of all the delusions and false religions which take place among mankind.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.viii-p120">With what care and circumspection does it become us to examine 
every doctrine and practice which is proposed or suggested to us as right and true; 
and to reject with resolution and abhorrence every thing of this kind, which is 
not agreeable to the oracles of God! Upon this law and testimony we ought to keep 
our eye, with constant, painful care and study, to understand it, and a readiness 
immediately to reject every thing which is not warranted by that, as dangerous delusion, 
from <pb n="300" id="iii.viii-Page_300" />whatever quarter, or by whomsoever it may be proposed, and however 
plausible and tempting it may be.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.viii-p121">III. The particular suggestion of Satan, contrary to revealed 
truth, by which he tempted our mother Eve to transgress, is worthy to be considered 
as a warning to us. “The serpent said unto the woman, <i>Ye shall not surely die</i>.” 
By hearkening to this lie of Satan she fell into sin and ruin. We may be sure the 
devil has been ever since urging this same lie upon men, as the great and principal 
delusion by which he holds them secure in his snare, and tempts them to go on boldly 
in rebellion. Those who are persuaded to believe this lie, which Satan tries by 
all means and ways in his power to propagate, are fallen into his snare; and in 
their attempts to promote it, they are his instruments and servants; and he influences 
them to the utmost of his power to make their bands strong, and to heighten their 
confidence, that they shall have peace, and no evil shall come upon them, though 
they walk after the imagination of their own hearts: And they have his assistance 
in searching and studying the scriptures to find passages, and to pervert them, 
so as to strengthen themselves and others in this dangerous delusion, by which their 
hearts are steeled against any impression by the many awful threatenings in the 
word of God.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.viii-p122">And where he cannot persuade men to <i>believe</i> there is no 
future punishment for impenitent sinners, he does all he can to keep them stupid 
and thoughtless, with respect to it, and make them feel and act as if they were 
exposed to no such punishment; and to flatter themselves with peace and safety, 
until sudden destruction cometh upon them. This is one special mean of holding men 
in security and ease in sin, in the christian world. And Satan has great advantage 
against mankind, in promoting this delusion, because it is agreeable to their hearts, 
and it is the nature of sin to be pleased with it, and to make men stupid and unbelieving 
with respect to the reality and dreadfulness of future punishment, and the danger 
in which they are of falling into it.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.viii-p123">Let all beware of this delusion, by which sin first entered into 
the world, and which has been the mean of <pb n="301" id="iii.viii-Page_301" />thousands and millions falling 
into that endless punishment, which they have not believed, or not realized, that 
it would ever come. “Though hand join in hand, the wicked shall not be unpunished.” 
“Wo unto the wicked, it shall be ill with him; for the reward of his hands shall 
be given him: Who shall be punished with everlasting destruction from the presence 
of the Lord, and the glory of his power.”</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.viii-p124">Let the ministers of the gospel, the watchmen on the walls of 
Jerusalem, not be silent, but cry aloud, and warn the wicked, to whom God has said, 
Ye shall surely die; and sound an alarm to all the secure in their sins, if by any 
means, they may be awakened from their deadly sleep, and delivered from their delusions, 
and fly from the wrath to come, before it shall be too late.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iii.viii-p125">IV. This subject leads us to see and reflect upon the infinitely 
guilty, miserable and lost state into which mankind are fallen by sin. They begin 
to sui, as soon as they are capable of moral exercise; and by one sinful exercise, 
were they guilty of no more, they undo themselves forever, if not delivered by mere 
sovereign grace. All their exercises are wrong and sinful, by which they are growing 
more and more guilty and ill deserving; and all the light they have, and the favours 
they enjoy, being abused, render them unspeakably criminal. They are so wholly inclined 
to sin, and with such strength and obstinacy of heart, fixed in enmity against God 
and his law, that they stand ready to oppose all means and every method that can 
be taken and used to recover them from sin and reclaim them; and if left to themselves, 
will only wax worse and worse, until they plunge into endless ruin, and intolerable 
misery. They are continually provoking God to cast them into everlasting destruction, 
on whose sovereign mercy they depend every moment, to save them from dropping into 
hell; and by whose forfeited grace, and almighty power alone, they can be recovered 
to repentance, and from sin and infinite evil. And at the same time they are flattering 
themselves in their evil ways, involved in the darkness and delusion of sin; loving 
darkness, and hating the light, and cannot be told in what an infinitely <pb n="302" id="iii.viii-Page_302" />
evil and dangerous case they are; that is, cannot be made to believe it, though 
they be told, and are ready to hate their best and only friends, and look upon them 
as their enemies; while they love their enemies, who are doing all they can to destroy 
them forever. But who can describe, or fully conceive the sinful, miserable, ruined 
condition into which mankind are fallen; and in which we all naturally are, and 
shall be forever, unless delivered by infinite, sovereign grace!</p>
<pb n="303" id="iii.viii-Page_303" />

</div2></div1>

<div1 title="System of Doctrines. Part II. Concerning the Redemption of Fallen, Lost Man, by Jesus Christ." prev="iii.viii" next="iv.i" id="iv">



<h2 id="iv-p0.1">SYSTEM OF DOCTRINES.</h2>
<hr style="width:30%; color:black; margin-top:24pt; margin-bottom:24pt" />
<h2 id="iv-p0.3">PART II.</h2>
<h3 id="iv-p0.4">CONCERNING THE REDEMPTION OF FALLEN, LOST MAN, BY JESUS CHRIST.</h3>
<hr style="width:20%; color:black; margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt" />

<div2 title="Chapter I. Some general Observations on the Redemption of Man." prev="iv" next="iv.ii" id="iv.i">


<h2 id="iv.i-p0.1">CHAP. I.</h2>
<p class="center" id="iv.i-p1"><i>Some general Observations on the Redemption of Man</i>.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.i-p2">1. WE depend wholly on divine revelation for all we know concerning 
the redemption of man. By this only we learn, that it is possible that man may be 
recovered from a state of sin and ruin; and that God has determined to redeem man, 
and is prosecuting this design. And by this only we can know what is implied in 
this, and what is the way and manner in which it is effected.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.i-p3">Man might justly be left to endless destruction, without any remedy, 
having fallen under the curse of the divine law, which is righteous and good. And 
that he could be saved consistent with this law, and the maintenance and honour 
of divine government, could not be known by any creature. And if it were known that 
it was possible for man to be delivered and saved, consistent with the honour of 
the divine law and government, it could not be known that God would see fit to do 
it, until he revealed his will and design in this matter. God was infinitely far 
from being under any obligations to show favour to man; it depended upon his sovereign 
will to determine whether man should be redeemed, or not: and if he were redeemed, 
it must be by the most free, undeserved sovereign mercy. Therefore that God Would 
show any mercy to sinners, could not be known <pb n="304" id="iv.i-Page_304" />by men or angels; or 
that this was possible, consistent with the holy law of God, and with wisdom and 
righteousness. This was hid in God from all creatures, until he was pleased to reveal 
his design. This indeed was done immediately upon the apostasy of man; and this 
important and glorious purpose of God has been opening more and more from that time 
to this: Which has been suited to excite and increase the attention and wonder of 
men and angels, through all ages.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.i-p4">In this revelation is comprehended what God has made known by 
declarations, promises and predictions in the holy scriptures, and by his providence, 
in ordering the events recorded in the historical part of scripture, and accomplishing 
many things which he has promised or predicted; by which the declarations, promises 
and prophecies are opened and explained, and light is thrown upon this grand design; 
while the word of God, and his providence in governing the world, and ordering all 
events, do most exactly agree and illustrate each other.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.i-p5">And the providence of God, as it respects the natural world, considered 
by itself, unconnected with his word in the holy scriptures, in preserving mankind, 
and giving them ease and health, and so many comforts and good things in this life, 
carries a language in it, and is a kind and degree of revelation of the disposition 
and will of God, declaring not only the being of God, and his universal and particular 
providence, and care of all his creatures; but also that he is good and kind to 
man in a sense and degree which is inconsistent with his being cast off without 
hope; and is a standing evidence to all who have proper discerning, that God is 
propitious to the human race; and that there is some way in which he may be reconciled, 
and show mercy to sinners. This seems to be the sentiment expressed by St. Paul 
in the following words. “Who in times past suffered all nations to walk in their 
own ways. Nevertheless he left not himself without witness, in that he did good, 
and gave us rain from heaven, and fruitful seasons, filling our hearts with food 
and gladness.”<note n="208" id="iv.i-p5.1"><p class="normal" id="iv.i-p6"><scripRef id="iv.i-p6.1" passage="Acts xiv. 16" parsed="|Acts|14|16|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Acts.14.16">Acts xiv. 16</scripRef>, <scripRef passage="Acts 14:17" id="iv.i-p6.2" parsed="|Acts|14|17|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Acts.14.17">17</scripRef>.</p></note></p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.i-p7">The witness or testimony of which the apostle here speaks, which 
was given to mankind in general by God, <pb n="305" id="iv.i-Page_305" />in his doing them good, and 
which was constantly held up in divine providence, was not merely of his existence, 
but of his kind care of man, and his readiness to be reconciled to him, without 
particularly pointing out the way and method in which this could be effected. This 
was a sufficient ground to excite their hope, and induce them to seek after him, 
and make all possible inquiries and search after the way in which they might obtain 
mercy; and to find what was necessary in order to their being saved. And God has 
so ordered the situation and bounds of mankind, both under the Mosaic and christian 
dispensation, that all who would take proper notice of this <i>witness</i> in divine 
providence, and improve it as they ought, and might do, might come to the knowledge 
of the truth They who lived before the incarnation of Christ could not fail of coming 
to the knowledge of the revelation given to the Israelites. And all mankind who 
have lived since might have come to the knowledge of the truth revealed by Christ 
and his apostles. This is asserted by St. Paul. “And hath made of one blood all 
nations of men, to dwell in all the face of the earth; and hath determined the times 
before appointed, and the bounds of their habitation; that they should seek the 
Lord, if haply they might feel after him, and find him.”<note n="209" id="iv.i-p7.1"><p class="normal" id="iv.i-p8"><scripRef id="iv.i-p8.1" passage="Acts xvii. 26" parsed="|Acts|17|26|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Acts.17.26">Acts xvii. 26</scripRef>, <scripRef passage="Acts 17:27" id="iv.i-p8.2" parsed="|Acts|17|27|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Acts.17.27">27</scripRef>.</p></note></p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.i-p9">Many who pay no regard to a written revelation have supposed that 
the dictates of reason, without any particular revelation from God, did assure them 
that he must pardon and receive to favour every penitent sinner, as it would be 
inconsistent with his goodness not to do it; therefore mankind want no other revelation 
from God to give them a certainty of this. But they have never been able to give 
any satisfactory evidence of this to those who properly attend to the matter; and 
what they call <i>reason</i>, appears to be <i>presumption</i>, when examined by 
impartial enlightened reason. There is nothing within the reach of the reason and 
knowledge of creatures that can afford the least evidence that God will pardon the 
penitent sinner, merely because he repents; or that this could be done consistent 
with the most perfect moral <pb n="306" id="iv.i-Page_306" />government; but the contrary appears most 
reasonable, viz. that the repentance of the criminal is not sufficient to give him 
any claim to forgiveness. And it is very evident and certain that such an opinion 
is inconsistent with real repentance; and that while a sinner thinks that his repentance 
will give a claim to forgiveness and favour, he is a stranger to true repentance, 
and never will repent, until he gives it up. Nor can he have the least evidence 
that any of mankind will ever repent, if left to themselves, and are not the subjects 
of those divine influences to which they have no claim, and which they have no reason 
to conclude God will grant. But this matter will be made more evident as we proceed 
on the subject of redemption.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.i-p10">II. <span class="sc" id="iv.i-p10.1">Redemption</span> does not extend to all 
sinful, fallen creatures, but many are left to suffer the just consequence of their 
rebellion, in everlasting punishment. No mercy has been extended to the fallen angels, 
of whom there are vast numbers. “For God spared not the angels that sinned, but 
cast them down to hell, and hath reserved them in everlasting chains of darkness, 
unto the judgment of the great day,”<note n="210" id="iv.i-p10.2"><p class="normal" id="iv.i-p11"><scripRef id="iv.i-p11.1" passage="2 Peter ii. 4" parsed="|2Pet|2|4|0|0" osisRef="Bible:2Pet.2.4">2 Peter ii. 4</scripRef>.—<scripRef passage="Jude 1:6" id="iv.i-p11.2" parsed="|Jude|1|6|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Jude.1.6">Jude 
6</scripRef>.</p></note> when they are to receive their final sentence to eternal punishment.<note n="211" id="iv.i-p11.3"><p class="normal" id="iv.i-p12">
<scripRef id="iv.i-p12.1" passage="Matt. xxv. 41" parsed="|Matt|25|41|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Matt.25.41">Matt. xxv. 41</scripRef>.—<scripRef passage="Rev 20:10" id="iv.i-p12.2" parsed="|Rev|20|10|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Rev.20.10">Rev. xx. 10</scripRef>.</p></note> 
And it is expressly and repeatedly declared in divine revelation that a part of 
mankind shall also be punished forever. To which they shall be sentenced, together 
with the fallen angels, at the judgment of the great day.<note n="212" id="iv.i-p12.3"><p class="normal" id="iv.i-p13">Matt. XXV. 41. 46.—<scripRef passage="Rev 20:10,15" id="iv.i-p13.1" parsed="|Rev|20|10|0|0;|Rev|20|15|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Rev.20.10 Bible:Rev.20.15">Rev. 
xx. 10, 15</scripRef>.—<scripRef passage="2Thes 1:8,9" id="iv.i-p13.2" parsed="|2Thess|1|8|1|9" osisRef="Bible:2Thess.1.8-2Thess.1.9">2 Thess. i. 8, 9</scripRef>.</p></note></p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.i-p14">This distinction, made between the fallen angels and mankind, 
and in favour of the latter, is not because man might not have been justly left 
to eternal ruin, or because he was less unworthy of mercy, and not so ill deserving, 
as the apostate angels; but for reasons in the view of infinite wisdom, which may, 
at least the most of them, be wholly out of our sight at present. As light and knowledge 
shall increase in the churchy the wisdom of God in this dispensation of sovereign 
grace will be more and more seen; and there will be an increasing discovery of this 
to angels and the redeemed in the eternal kingdom of God.</p>
<pb n="307" id="iv.i-Page_307" />
<p class="normal" id="iv.i-p15">We are also certain that infinite wisdom saw it best that redemption 
should not extend to all mankind, so that every one of the human race should be 
actually saved, though we were not able to see the reason of this, and the contrary 
should appear to us to be most wise and best; for we are infinitely far from being 
competent judges in this case; and there is the highest reason that we should acquiesce, 
and be satisfied with the declaration and conduct of the infinitely wise and benevolent 
Being, who is able, and to whom it belonged to determine whether all the human race 
should be saved or not. For we are sure that it is determined perfectly right, and 
that all mankind could not be actually redeemed, consistent with the good of the 
whole, or consistent with wisdom and goodness.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.i-p16">It also belongs to the supreme, infinitely wise and benevolent 
Being to determine what number and proportion of mankind shall be saved, and fix 
upon every individual person, since all this depends upon him, and he has a right 
to do as he pleases, and he only knows what is most wise and best. “Hath not the 
potter power over the clay, of the same lump to make one vessel unto honour, and 
another unto dishonour?”</p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.i-p17">We are not in express words of revelation informed what proportion 
of mankind shall be saved, whether the greater or less part of them, on the whole. 
But perhaps more is revealed with respect to this than has been supposed, and which 
is contrary to what has been generally thought to be asserted in the scriptures. 
It has been thought by many, that when Christ says, “Strait is the gate, and narrow 
is the way which leadeth unto life, and few there be that find it. Many are called, 
but few chosen. Fear not <i>little flock</i>,” he declares that but few, a very 
small part of mankind, shall be saved. But when we attend to these words of Christ, 
we shall find that they are spoken of the then present time; and nothing is asserted 
concerning that which shall take place in future ages; and therefore have no relation 
to the point before us, and determine nothing about it. When this question was put 
to him, “Lord, are there few that shall be saved?” He did not think proper 
to answer it <i>then</i>, by expressly affirming or denying; but <pb n="308" id="iv.i-Page_308" />only 
said, that <i>many</i> should not be saved; and improved this truth to excite all 
to secure their own salvation, without delay: Which is consistent with there being 
many more saved than lost.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.i-p18">When we attend to the many predictions of the flourishing, greatness 
and extent of the church and kingdom of Christ in the last days, so as to fill the 
whole world, when “the kingdom and dominion, and <i>the greatness of the kingdom 
under the whole heaven</i>, shall be given to the people of the saints of the Most 
High;” and are assured that this state of prosperity shall continue, at least a 
thousand years, we shall find no reason to conclude that but few of mankind will 
be saved, in comparison with those who shall perish; but see ground to believe that 
the number of the former will far exceed that of the latter.<note n="213" id="iv.i-p18.1"><p class="normal" id="iv.i-p19">The reader may 
see this more fully considered in Dr. Bellamy’s discourse on the Millennium. Some 
attention is also paid to this point; and the reasons are suggested, why redemption 
does not include the salvation of all men, in “An inquiry concerning the future 
state of those who die in their sins.” Page 182, &amp;c.</p></note> But were there nothing 
revealed by which we could determine any thing with respect to this, we might well 
rest satisfied that God, who is infinitely wise and good, has fixed the number of 
those who shall be saved, and of those who shall not be saved, so as exactly to 
answer the best end, and promote the greatest general good; and may be as certain 
that many of mankind w ill perish forever, as we can be that the Bible is a revelation 
from God, since this is there so expressly, abundantly, and in such a variety of 
ways declared and established.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.i-p20">III. The Redemption of man is the greatest instance of the exercise 
and manifestation of the benevolence, or the love and goodness of God, that ever 
took place, or that ever will. It is the greatest possible exercise and display 
of divine benevolence; in which there is the best and most ample ground and scope 
for the highest increasing and endless discovery of the love and goodness of the 
infinitely benevolent Being.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.i-p21">The benevolence of the Deity is exercised, and appears in all 
his works; but in the work of redemption is the fullest, most perfect and bright 
display of the divine <pb n="309" id="iv.i-Page_309" />love, as all the works of God have reference 
to this as their result and end, in which his design in all is manifested. This 
is every where set in this light in the Holy Scripture. “God so <span class="sc" id="iv.i-p21.1">
loved</span> the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth 
in him should not perish, but have everlasting life.”<note n="214" id="iv.i-p21.2"><p class="normal" id="iv.i-p22"><scripRef id="iv.i-p22.1" passage="John iii. 16" parsed="|John|3|16|0|0" osisRef="Bible:John.3.16">John iii. 16</scripRef>.</p></note> 
God is <span class="sc" id="iv.i-p22.2">love</span>. In this was manifested the love of God towards 
us, that God sent his only begotten Son into the world, that we might live through 
him. Herein is <span class="sc" id="iv.i-p22.3">love</span>, not that we have loved God, but that 
he loved us, and sent his Son to be the propitiation for our sins. Behold! <i>What 
manner of love</i> the Father hath bestowed upon us, that we should be called the 
sons of God.”<note n="215" id="iv.i-p22.4"><p class="normal" id="iv.i-p23"><scripRef id="iv.i-p23.1" passage="1 John iii. 1" parsed="|1John|3|1|0|0" osisRef="Bible:1John.3.1">1 John iii. 1</scripRef>, <scripRef passage="1 John 3:4" id="iv.i-p23.2" parsed="|1John|3|4|0|0" osisRef="Bible:1John.3.4">4</scripRef>, <scripRef passage="1 John 3:8" id="iv.i-p23.3" parsed="|1John|3|8|0|0" osisRef="Bible:1John.3.8">8</scripRef>, <scripRef passage="1 John 3:9" id="iv.i-p23.4" parsed="|1John|3|9|0|0" osisRef="Bible:1John.3.9">9</scripRef>, <scripRef passage="1 John 3:10" id="iv.i-p23.5" parsed="|1John|3|10|0|0" osisRef="Bible:1John.3.10">10</scripRef>.</p></note></p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.i-p24">Thus the sacred oracles celebrate the work of redemption as the 
highest and most remarkable instance of divine love, and direct us there, to behold 
it acted out in the highest degree, and to the greatest advantage, to be seen and 
admired by creatures; as an inexhaustible and endless object of gratitude and praise.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.i-p25">The reason and propriety of this representation in divine revelation, 
and that the work of redemption is infinitely the greatest instance and display 
of divine benevolence, will in some measure appear, if the following things be well 
considered.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.i-p26">1. Benevolence exercised in the bestowment of favour, is greater 
or less, according to the greater or less unworthiness and ill desert of those who 
are the objects of the benevolence. If those on whom good is bestowed, be worthy 
or deserving, the granting that good or benefit, is really paying a debt, and is 
an act of justice. And though benevolence may be exercised in doing this, as it 
is contrary to benevolence not to give what is deserved; yet the goodness exercised 
in this case is not so apparently disinterested; nor does it require so great a 
degree of goodness, as it does to bestow favours on the unworthy and ill deserving. 
The latter is <i>free grace</i>, sovereign, disinterested goodness: the former may 
not be so. And the more unworthy and ill deserving they are to whom favour is shown, 
the greater is the degree of benevolence exercised in granting <pb n="310" id="iv.i-Page_310" />the 
favour: For it requires a greater degree of benevolence to shew kindness to those 
who deserve no good, but evil, than to be kind to those who have no ill desert; 
and the degree of benevolence exercised in granting favour, is in proportion to 
the degree of ill desert of those who are the subjects of it.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.i-p27">In this respect the divine benevolence appears to be unbounded 
and wonderful in the redemption of man. Man, by rebellion against his Maker, is 
become infinitely unworthy and ill deserving, as he is infinitely criminal. And 
he does not only sin in one, or a few instances, but is wholly a rebel, and become 
a total enemy to God. Mankind have taken up arms against Heaven, and they are universally 
and constantly acting out their opposition and enmity against God, with great strength, 
obstinacy and violence. “Every imagination of the thoughts of man’s heart is only 
evil continually. The heart of the sons of men is full of evil, and madness is in 
their heart, while they live. There is none that doeth good, no, not one. They are
<i>all</i> gone out of the way. Their throat is an open sepulchre. The poison of 
asps is under their lips. Their mouth is full of cursing and bitterness. Their feet 
are swift to shed blood. There is no fear of God before their eyes.” They will not 
be reclaimed from their rebellion and enmity against God by any methods that can 
betaken to bring them to submit and return to obedience, short of taking away their 
rebellious heart by almighty power immediately exerted, and creating them anew. 
But the more favour is shown to them, and the greater the kindness is which they 
receive, the more will they rebel and act against their greatest benefactor, abusing, 
despising, and trampling upon all his goodness to them; they being “<i>desperately</i> 
wicked,” and wholly irreclaimable by any means, provoking their Maker to destroy 
them, to the utmost of their power. This was all seen by the omniscient Jehovah. 
And no benevolence short of infinite could be disposed to spare, and show favour 
to such infinitely criminal, ill deserving, odious, and God provoking, obstinate 
enemies as men were. Therefore the redemption of such creatures calls for the strongest 
exercise, and gives the brightest display of divine, infinite <pb n="311" id="iv.i-Page_311" />
benevolence or goodness. St. Paul sets it in this light in the following words. 
“Scarcely for a righteous man will one die; yet, peradventure, for a good man some 
would even dare to die. But God commendeth his love towards us, in that <i>while 
we were yet sinners</i>, and <i>when we were enemies</i>, Christ died for us.”<note n="216" id="iv.i-p27.1"><p class="normal" id="iv.i-p28">
<scripRef id="iv.i-p28.1" passage="Rom. v. 7" parsed="|Rom|5|7|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Rom.5.7">Rom. v. 7</scripRef>, <scripRef passage="Rom 5:8" id="iv.i-p28.2" parsed="|Rom|5|8|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Rom.5.8">8</scripRef>, <scripRef passage="Rom 5:10" id="iv.i-p28.3" parsed="|Rom|5|10|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Rom.5.10">10</scripRef>.</p></note></p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.i-p29">2. The greater the evil is from which any one is delivered by 
undeserved goodness, the greater and the more perspicuous is the benevolence which 
is exercised in such deliverance; and the more gratitude to the benefactor is due 
from him who is delivered. In the case before us there is the most ample room for 
the exercise and display of benevolence, in this respect. Man was fallen into a 
state of <i>infinite</i> misery and wretchedness, under the curse of the divine 
law, which implies separation from all good and happiness, and the suffering all 
the evil of which he is capable, without end. This man must have suffered forever 
without the least mitigation or relief, had not redemption taken place. By his apostasy 
man was become a vassal to Satan, and his heart was wholly under the power of moral 
depravity, from which nothing could deliver him but the mighty arm of Omnipotence. 
From this complicated, infinitely evil state, every one is completely delivered, 
who shares in redemption by Christ. Nothing short of the exertion of infinite, omnipotent, 
all sufficient benevolence, is sufficient to rescue man from this infinitely guilty, 
miserable state.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.i-p30">3. The exercise and expression of benevolence is strong and great 
in proportion to the degree of positive good and happiness which is bestowed.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.i-p31">Deliverance from evil is a benefit, and may be called a negative 
good; and this benefit is great in proportion to the degree of evil from which deliverance 
is granted. And the degree of benevolence expressed in such deliverance is great, 
in proportion to the greatness of the evil from which the miserable subject is delivered. 
This has been considered under the foregoing particular. What is now brought into 
view is the degree of <i>positive</i> good which is bestowed by benevolence. A less 
degree of benevolence may procure and give a small benefit, <pb n="312" id="iv.i-Page_312" />which 
is insufficient to prompt to bestow a much greater benefit. Therefore the greater 
the benefit is, which is given, the greater is the exercise and manifestation of 
that goodness which wills and procures it. In the redemption of man, the positive 
good procured and bestowed is infinitely great, being great and increasing in degree, 
and in duration <i>endless</i>. It is <i>everlasting life</i>, in the most happy 
and honourable circumstances possible. Nothing short of the infinite love of the 
omnipotent, all sufficient <span class="sc" id="iv.i-p31.1">jehovah</span>, can give such infinite 
good to infinitely ill deserving rebels. In this view, infinite benevolence is exercised 
and most conspicuously displayed in the redemption of man. Inspired with the view 
and sense of this, St. John exclaims, “Behold, <i>what manner of </i>
<span class="sc" id="iv.i-p31.2">love </span>the Father hath bestowed upon <i>us</i>, that <i>we</i> 
should be called the sons of God! Beloved, now are we the sons of God, and it doth 
not yet appear what we shall be: But we know that, when he shall appear, we shall 
be like him.” In the redemption of man an unbounded field is opened in which divine 
benevolence is displayed to the best advantage, and God “fulfils all the good pleasure 
of his goodness,” in bestowing infinite happiness and glory on the redeemed; unspeakably 
greater than man could have enjoyed, had he not sinned, and rendered himself infinitely 
unworthy of the least favour; and infinitely more “to the praise of his rich and 
glorious grace.”</p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.i-p32">4. The greater the difficulties and obstacles are, which must 
be removed or surmounted, in order to bestow a favour, and the greater the expense, 
cost and trouble, which are necessary, in order to procure it, the greater and more 
strong is the exercise of goodness in procuring: and bestowing the benefit. This 
is so evident that no proof or illustration is necessary.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.i-p33">There were difficulties and impediments which must be removed, 
and such infinite expense and sufferings were necessary, in order to redeem man, 
which could not be effected by any thing short of infinite power, wisdom and goodness. 
Man had fallen under the curse of the righteous and perfect law of God. It was inconsistent 
with rectoral righteousness, and infinite goodness; to set aside, or disregard this 
law, in favour of rebellious <pb n="313" id="iv.i-Page_313" />man, so as to pardon and receive him 
to favour, without paying any regard to the execution of the curse threatened, in 
any sense or degree. It was of infinite importance that the law and moral government 
should be maintained, and the curse threatened, properly and fully executed. This 
put man out of the reach of divine infinite goodness, Unless some expedient could 
be found, some way be devised, in which the law of God might be regarded and maintained, 
and the penalty of it executed, consistent with pardoning and shewing favour to 
man. This rendered it necessary that God himself, in the second person of the adorable 
Trinity, should assume human nature into a personal union, so as to form one person, 
who is both God and man; and that this person should, in the human nature, be made 
under the law, and support and honour it by obeying the precepts, and suffering 
the curse of it, in the room and stead of man. In this way only could man be delivered 
from the curse of the law, and obtain complete redemption, consistent with divine 
truth, rectoral righteousness, wisdom and goodness. Had not all this been necessary 
in order to redeem man, and might he be saved consistent with the divine law, without 
such a Mediator, doing and suffering all this, the love and grace exercised in redeeming 
and saving him would have been infinitely less, and as nothing compared with that 
benevolence which is expressed in the incarnation, humiliation, death and sufferings 
of the Son of God, which are necessarily implied in this redemption. God the Father 
giving his Son, and the Son of God giving himself, to suffer an ignominious, cruel 
death, and be made a curse, that sinners, his enemies, might be redeemed from the 
curse, and have eternal life, is an infinitely greater gift, and higher exercise 
and expression of disinterested love or benevolence, than merely to save man from 
eternal destruction, and give him endless life, could the latter be done without 
the former.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.i-p34">This is the light in which the holy scripture sets this matter. 
There this is represented as the greatest, most remarkable and glorious instance 
and display of divine benevolence, that God has given his Son to die, and Christ 
has given himself unto death as a ransom, to deliver <pb n="314" id="iv.i-Page_314" />sinners from 
hell, and procure eternal life for them. “God <i>so loved</i> the world, <i>that 
he gave his only begotten Son</i>, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, 
but have everlasting life.”<note n="217" id="iv.i-p34.1"><p class="normal" id="iv.i-p35"><scripRef id="iv.i-p35.1" passage="John iii. 16" parsed="|John|3|16|0|0" osisRef="Bible:John.3.16">John iii. 16</scripRef>.</p></note> “God commendeth (displays 
in the most amiable, and brightest light) his <span class="sc" id="iv.i-p35.2">love</span> towards 
us, in that while we were yet sinners, <i>Christ died for us</i>.”<note n="218" id="iv.i-p35.3"><p class="normal" id="iv.i-p36"><scripRef id="iv.i-p36.1" passage="Rom. v. 8" parsed="|Rom|5|8|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Rom.5.8">Rom. v. 
8</scripRef>.</p></note> “Hereby perceive we the love of God, <i>because he laid down his life 
for us</i>. In this was manifested the <i>love</i> of God towards us, <i>because 
that God sent his only begotten Son into the world</i>, that we might live through 
him. <i>Herein is love!</i> Not that we loved God, but that he loved us, and sent 
his Son to be a propitiation for our sins.”<note n="219" id="iv.i-p36.2"><p class="normal" id="iv.i-p37"><scripRef passage="1John 3:16" id="iv.i-p37.1" parsed="|1John|3|16|0|0" osisRef="Bible:1John.3.16">
1 John iii. 16</scripRef>. <scripRef passage="1John 4:9,10" id="iv.i-p37.2" parsed="|1John|4|9|4|10" osisRef="Bible:1John.4.9-1John.4.10">iv. 9, 10</scripRef>.</p></note></p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.i-p38">5. There is something yet farther necessary in order to the salvation 
of men. Though by the atonement which Christ has made by his death, a way is open 
for the pardon and salvation of sinners, consistent with rectoral righteousness, 
and- the honour of the divine law; yet man is so obstinate in his rebellion, and 
such an enemy to God, that he cannot be persuaded to embrace the gospel; but will 
dislike and oppose Christ and the way of salvation by him, unless his heart be renewed 
by the omnipotent influences of the holy Spirit. Christ has therefore obtained by 
his obedience and sufferings, the holy Spirit to be given unto men to recover them 
from their total depravity, and form their hearts to true holiness. This is an infinite 
gift. It is no less than God giving himself to men, in the third person of the adorable 
Trinity; uniting himself to them, and dwelling in them, as the principle and author 
of all their holiness and happiness forever. Did man need no such gift and grace, 
the divine goodness and beneficence in his redemption would be unspeakably less, 
and would not be so gloriously displayed, as now they are. In order to redeem man, 
God not only delivers him from infinite wo, and gives him infinite happiness and 
glory, when man in himself is infinitely odious, guilty and ill deserving; but, 
in order to this, <i>gives himself</i> repeatedly, and in different ways. He gave 
himself to die on the cross, a ransom for man, to be a propitiation for their sins. 
The Father gave the 
<pb n="315" id="iv.i-Page_315" />Son, and the Son gave himself. He gives himself also in the third 
person of the Trinity, the Holy Ghost, in renewing and sanctifying the redeemed, 
and dwelling in them forever. The Mediator said, “I will pray the Father, 
and he shall give you another Comforter, that he may abide with you forever; even 
the Spirit of truth.”<note n="220" id="iv.i-p38.1"><p class="normal" id="iv.i-p39"><scripRef id="iv.i-p39.1" passage="John xiv. 16" parsed="|John|14|16|0|0" osisRef="Bible:John.14.16">John xiv. 16</scripRef>, <scripRef passage="John 14:17" id="iv.i-p39.2" parsed="|John|14|17|0|0" osisRef="Bible:John.14.17">17</scripRef>.</p></note> And God, in a Trinity of Persons, 
gives himself to the redeemed as their infinite, everlasting portion and happiness. 
Thus divine benevolence is exhausted, and gives <i>all</i> away: Infinite goodness 
can give no more. God gives himself, and all he has for the redemption of man! This 
is, in the highest degree, an “unspeakable gift.”</p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.i-p40">6. This benevolence and goodness appears greater, and is more 
illustrious in the salvation of man, in that all is given <i>freely</i>, without 
money and without price, as man is infinitely unworthy of it; and, as such, receives 
this redemption as a <i>free gift</i>, the whole being offered and given to every 
one who is willing to receive it. Men obtain an interest in this salvation, not 
by works of righteousness which they do; not by any worthiness in them, or by any 
thing they offer, as the price of the divine favour; but by believing in the Mediator, 
receiving the record which God has given concerning his Son, and accepting salvation, 
as it is freely offered and given, trusting wholly in Christ, and receiving all 
from him, as a free gift, to such who are not only wholly without any desert of 
the least favour; but are infinitely odious and ill deserving. This is to be saved 
by faith, by which the free grace of God in the salvation of sinners is exercised 
and displayed to the highest degree, as is abundantly represented in divine revelation. 
St. Paul insists much upon this. He having proved from scripture that all men are 
sinners, consequently infinitely ill deserving, says, ”Therefore by the deeds of 
the law there shall no flesh be justified in his sight; for by the law is the knowledge 
of sin. But now the righteousness of God, without the law, is manifested, even the 
righteousness of God, which is <i>by faith of Jesus Christ</i> unto all, and upon 
all them that believe. Being justified <i>freely by his grace</i>, through the redemption 
that is in 
<pb n="316" id="iv.i-Page_316" />Jesus Christ: Whom God hath set forth a propitiation, <i>through faith 
in his blood</i>. Now to him that worketh, (that is, in order to offer his works 
as the price of God’s favour,) is the reward not reckoned of <i>grace</i>, but of 
debt. But to him that worketh not, (that is, has nothing to recommend him, and acknowledges 
he has done nothing by which he deserves the divine favour, more than any other 
man,) but <i>believeth</i> on him that justifieth the ungodly, his faith is counted 
for righteousness. <i>Therefore it is of faith, that it might be by grace.</i>”<note n="221" id="iv.i-p40.1"><p class="normal" id="iv.i-p41">
<scripRef id="iv.i-p41.1" passage="Rom. iii. 20" parsed="|Rom|3|20|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Rom.3.20">Rom. iii. 20</scripRef>, &amp;c. <scripRef passage="Rom 4:4,5,16" id="iv.i-p41.2" parsed="|Rom|4|4|4|5;|Rom|4|16|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Rom.4.4-Rom.4.5 Bible:Rom.4.16">iv. 4, 5, 16</scripRef>.</p></note> 
“<i>By grace</i> are ye saved, <i>through faith</i>, and that not of yourselves, 
it is the gift of God.”<note n="222" id="iv.i-p41.3"><p class="normal" id="iv.i-p42"><scripRef id="iv.i-p42.1" passage="Eph. ii. 8" parsed="|Eph|2|8|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Eph.2.8">Eph. ii. 8</scripRef>.</p></note></p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.i-p43">The above particulars, put together, and taken into one view, 
serve to illustrate the observation, that the redemption of man is the highest instance 
of the exercise of the love of God, in which divine, infinite benevolence has an 
object equal to itself, and is acted out and displayed to the highest degree, and 
best advantage to be seen and celebrated by the redeemed and all holy creatures, 
with increasing views and happiness forever and ever. In the redemption of man, 
the infinitely benevolent Jehovah, “fulfils <i>all</i> the good pleasure of his 
goodness,<note n="223" id="iv.i-p43.1"><p class="normal" id="iv.i-p44"><scripRef id="iv.i-p44.1" passage="2 Thess. i. 11" parsed="|2Thess|1|11|0|0" osisRef="Bible:2Thess.1.11">2 Thess. i. 11</scripRef>.</p></note> 
and mercy is built up forever.”<note n="224" id="iv.i-p44.2"><p class="normal" id="iv.i-p45"><scripRef id="iv.i-p45.1" passage="Psalm lxxxix. 2" parsed="|Ps|89|2|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Ps.89.2">Psalm lxxxix. 2</scripRef>.</p></note> In this work God shows 
his glory by causing <i>all his goodness</i> to be displayed before the redeemed; 
while his name is proclaimed and celebrated. “The Lord, the Lord God, merciful and 
gracious, long suffering, and <i>abundant in goodness</i>, keeping mercy for thousands, 
forgiving iniquity and transgression and sin.”<note n="225" id="iv.i-p45.2"><p class="normal" id="iv.i-p46"><scripRef passage="Exod 33:18,19" id="iv.i-p46.1" parsed="|Exod|33|18|33|19" osisRef="Bible:Exod.33.18-Exod.33.19">
Exod. xxxiii. 18, 19</scripRef>. <scripRef passage="Exod 34:6,7" id="iv.i-p46.2" parsed="|Exod|34|6|34|7" osisRef="Bible:Exod.34.6-Exod.34.7">xxxiv. 6, 7</scripRef>.</p></note> 
This goodness, this love of God, is in scripture celebrated as <i>great</i> love. 
“But God, who is <i>rich in mercy</i>, for the <i>great love</i>, wherewith he loved 
us, &amp;c. Love which passeth knowledge.”<note n="226" id="iv.i-p46.3"><p class="normal" id="iv.i-p47"><scripRef id="iv.i-p47.1" passage="Eph. ii. 4" parsed="|Eph|2|4|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Eph.2.4">Eph. ii. 4</scripRef>. <scripRef passage="Eph 3:19" id="iv.i-p47.2" parsed="|Eph|3|19|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Eph.3.19">
iii. 19</scripRef>.</p></note> It is called <i>the riches, the exceeding riches of his 
grace</i>. “In whom we have redemption through his blood, the forgiveness of sins,
<i>according to the riches of his grace</i>. And hath raised us up together, and 
made us sit together in heavenly places, in Christ Jesus. That in the ages to come, 
he might show <i>the exceeding riches of his grace</i>, in his kindness towards 
us through Jesus Christ.”<note n="227" id="iv.i-p47.3"><p class="normal" id="iv.i-p48"><scripRef id="iv.i-p48.1" passage="Eph. i. 7" parsed="|Eph|1|7|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Eph.1.7">Eph. i. 7</scripRef>.<scripRef passage="Eph 2:6,7" id="iv.i-p48.2" parsed="|Eph|2|6|2|7" osisRef="Bible:Eph.2.6-Eph.2.7"> ii. 6, 
7</scripRef>.</p></note></p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.i-p49">The love of God is exercised in the redemption of man in its infinite 
strength, in overcoming difficulties and obstacles infinitely great, which were 
in the way of the exercise of it towards man, and opposed it; in delivering from 
infinite evil, and giving him infinite good. This benevolence is infinite <i>mercy</i> 
and compassion to the infinitely miserable. It is exceeding rich, free and sovereign
<i>grace</i>, which gives such deliverance, such salvation, not only to the undeserving, 
but infinitely guilty, vile and ill deserving.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.i-p50">IV. This design and work, the redemption of man, has been gradually 
introduced and opened from the first apostasy to the coming of Christ, and from 
that time down to this day; and w ill be carried on until it shall be completed, 
at the end of the world, and the day of judgment.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.i-p51">Every thing, and all events which took place in the world, from 
the beginning of it, during four thousand years, were preparatory to the coming 
and incarnation of the Redeemer; while other ends, respecting redemption, were in 
view, and answered. And since that event, and the resurrection and exaltation of 
Christ to the throne of his kingdom, what has taken place is to be considered as 
the first fruits of redemption, and preparatory to much greater things, which are 
yet to take place in the accomplishment of this great work, which will not be completed 
till the day of judgment. This has been represented by our Saviour in a number of 
similitudes, such as the following. “The kingdom of heaven is like to a grain 
of mustard seed, which a man took and sowed in his field; which indeed is the least 
of all seeds; but when it is grown, it is the greatest among herbs, and becometh 
a tree: So that the birds of the air come and lodge in the branches thereof. He 
spoke another parable. The kingdom of heaven is like unto leaven, which a woman 
took and hid in three measures of meal, till the whole was leavened.”<note n="228" id="iv.i-p51.1"><p class="normal" id="iv.i-p52"><scripRef id="iv.i-p52.1" passage="Matt. xiii. 31" parsed="|Matt|13|31|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Matt.13.31">Matt. 
xiii. 31</scripRef>, <scripRef passage="Matt 13:32" id="iv.i-p52.2" parsed="|Matt|13|32|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Matt.13.32">32</scripRef>, <scripRef passage="Matt 13:33" id="iv.i-p52.3" parsed="|Matt|13|33|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Matt.13.33">33</scripRef>.</p></note> “And he said. So is the kingdom of God, as if a man should 
cast seed into the ground, and should sleep, and rise night and day, and the seed 
should spring and grow up, he knoweth not how. For the earth bringeth forth fruit 
of herself, 
<pb n="318" id="iv.i-Page_318" />first the blade, then the ear, after that the full corn in the ear: 
But when the fruit is brought forth, immediately he putteth in the sickle, because 
the harvest is come.”<note n="229" id="iv.i-p52.4"><p class="normal" id="iv.i-p53"><scripRef id="iv.i-p53.1" passage="Mark iv. 26-39" parsed="|Mark|4|26|4|39" osisRef="Bible:Mark.4.26-Mark.4.39">Mark iv. 26-39</scripRef>.</p></note></p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.i-p54">V. The work of redemption is the greatest and most glorious work 
of God, and, indeed, the sum and end of all his works.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.i-p55">This is abundantly evident from divine revelation; which revelation 
itself originated from this design, and has been formed and given to man, in order 
to promote and accomplish it. It is of no importance or worth, any farther than 
it answers ends which respect the redemption of man. This asserts that the <i>new 
creation</i>, by which is meant the work of redemption, or the church of the redeemed, 
which is the New Jerusalem with the inhabitants, is so superior to the old creation, 
or the natural world, and so much the end of it, that the first creation shall be 
swallowed up and forgotten, in the existence and glory of the latter. “Behold, I 
create new heavens, and a new earth: And the former shall not be remembered, nor 
come into mind. But be you glad and rejoice forever, in that which I create: For 
behold, I create Jerusalem a rejoicing, and her people a joy.”<note n="230" id="iv.i-p55.1"><p class="normal" id="iv.i-p56"><scripRef id="iv.i-p56.1" passage="Isaiah lxv. 17" parsed="|Isa|65|17|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Isa.65.17">Isaiah lxv. 
17</scripRef>, <scripRef passage="Isaiah 65:18" id="iv.i-p56.2" parsed="|Isa|65|18|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Isa.65.18">18</scripRef>.</p></note> 
This is most expressly asserted in the following words. “For by Him were all things 
created that are in heaven, and that are in earth, visible and invisible, whether 
they be thrones, or dominions, or principalities, or powers: All things were created 
by Him, <span class="sc" id="iv.i-p56.3">and for Him</span>.”</p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.i-p57">All the created universe, containing every creature and thing, 
visible and invisible, greater and less, are here said to be created <i>for Christ</i>, 
considered as God, Man, and Mediator, the Redeemer of man; for in that character 
and capacity he is considered, described and spoken of in these words, and the context, 
as being “the head of the body, the church, who have redemption through his blood.” 
For Him, as the Redeemer of the church, and for the sake of the work of redemption; 
for Christ, the Son of God, and his redeemed church, were all things made, and to 
this end they are all subordinated, in the works of creation and providence. He 
is therefore “appointed the heir of <i>all </i><pb n="319" id="iv.i-Page_319" /><i>things</i>,”<note n="231" id="iv.i-p57.1"><p class="normal" id="iv.i-p58">
<scripRef id="iv.i-p58.1" passage="Heb. i. 2" parsed="|Heb|1|2|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Heb.1.2">Heb. i. 2</scripRef>.</p></note> and made head over <i>all things to the church</i>; all things 
being put under his feet.<note n="232" id="iv.i-p58.2"><p class="normal" id="iv.i-p59"><scripRef id="iv.i-p59.1" passage="Eph. i. 22" parsed="|Eph|1|22|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Eph.1.22">Eph. i. 22</scripRef>.</p></note></p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.i-p60">It is hence most certain, that all the works of God have reference 
to the work of redemption, as their end, being all subordinated to this, in order 
to promote and perfect it, and really belong to it, as parts and appendages of it. 
All things are created for the sake of Christ and his church, and therefore they 
are all used and improved for this end in the course of divine providence; which 
consists in ordering and disposing all events, and using all things so as completely 
to answer the end for which they were made.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.i-p61">And that the work of Redemption is the greatest and most glorious 
of all the works of God, and the end of all, will be evident, if we consider what 
it is, and the things which it comprises. To this belong the character and works 
of the Mediator. There could have been no such character as this, and no such works 
as he has done, had there been no redemption of man. And his character, and his 
works, are infinitely greater and more glorious than any could have been, had not 
redemption taken place. There is an unspeakably greater and more illustrious display 
of the divine character and perfections in “God manifest in the flesh,” than could 
have been in any other way. And to redeem the church by giving himself a ransom 
for it, even his life on the accursed cross; to recover man from the power of sin 
and Satan; to sanctify the church and make it a perfectly holy and most beautiful 
society, is, beyond all comparison, a greater work of power, wisdom and goodness, 
than creating and upholding all worlds, or the government of all possible moral 
worlds, exclusive of this. Therefore in this work is the proper and full display 
of the divine perfections, which is the highest end of all God’s works.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.i-p62">And by the redemption of the church and the eternal kingdom of 
Christ, the greatest possible happiness of the creation is effected, as an eternal 
monument of the infinite power, wisdom and goodness of God. All intelligent creatures 
who are friends to God, will be, beyond expression, more holy and happy, than they 
could have been, had there been no such person and character <pb n="320" id="iv.i-Page_320" />as that 
of the Redeemer, and no redemption. Though holy angels be not redeemed, yet they 
behold the works of redemption, and the Redeemer with holy love, admiration and 
joy; and see and enjoy unspeakably more of God, than otherwise they could have done, 
and are happy in their activity to promote it. “Into this the angels desire to look.”<note n="233" id="iv.i-p62.1"><p class="normal" id="iv.i-p63">
<scripRef id="iv.i-p63.1" passage="1 Peter i. 12" parsed="|1Pet|1|12|0|0" osisRef="Bible:1Pet.1.12">1 Peter i. 12</scripRef>.</p></note> “To the intent that now unto principalities and powers in 
heavenly places, might be known <i>by the church</i>, the manifold wisdom of God.”<note n="234" id="iv.i-p63.2"><p class="normal" id="iv.i-p64">
<scripRef id="iv.i-p64.1" passage="Eph. iii. 10" parsed="|Eph|3|10|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Eph.3.10">Eph. iii. 10</scripRef>.</p></note> “Are they not all ministering spirits, sent forth to minister 
for them who shall be heirs of salvation?”<note n="235" id="iv.i-p64.2"><p class="normal" id="iv.i-p65"><scripRef id="iv.i-p65.1" passage="Heb i. 14" parsed="|Heb|1|14|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Heb.1.14">Heb i. 14</scripRef>.</p></note> By this they 
have a song to sing which otherwise they never could have known. “Glory to God in 
the highest, and on earth peace, good will to men.”<note n="236" id="iv.i-p65.2"><p class="normal" id="iv.i-p66"><scripRef id="iv.i-p66.1" passage="Luke ii. 14" parsed="|Luke|2|14|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Luke.2.14">Luke ii. 14</scripRef>.</p></note></p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.i-p67">Thus we have abundant evidence from scripture, and from the reason 
and nature of it, that the work of redemption is not a secondary purpose, detached 
from the original plan of divine operations; but is itself the first and original 
design and end of all the works of God, to which all things in creation and providence, 
in the divine purpose, have respect, and are subordinated. “Jesus Christ, 
the Lamb slain from the foundation of the world, was himself foreordained before 
the foundation of the world.”<note n="237" id="iv.i-p67.1"><p class="normal" id="iv.i-p68"><scripRef id="iv.i-p68.1" passage="1 Peter i. 20" parsed="|1Pet|1|20|0|0" osisRef="Bible:1Pet.1.20">1 Peter i. 20</scripRef>.</p></note> And all the favour, good 
and happiness bestowed on the church, was, by the divine purpose and decree, “given 
to them, in Christ Jesus, before the world began;”<note n="238" id="iv.i-p68.2"><p class="normal" id="iv.i-p69"><scripRef id="iv.i-p69.1" passage="2 Tim. i. 9" parsed="|2Tim|1|9|0|0" osisRef="Bible:2Tim.1.9">2 Tim. i. 9</scripRef>.</p></note> they 
being “chosen in him, before the foundation of the world, according to the eternal 
purpose, which he purposed in Christ Jesus our Lord.”<note n="239" id="iv.i-p69.2"><p class="normal" id="iv.i-p70"><scripRef id="iv.i-p70.1" passage="Eph. i. 4" parsed="|Eph|1|4|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Eph.1.4">Eph. i. 4</scripRef>.—<scripRef passage="Eph 3:11" id="iv.i-p70.2" parsed="|Eph|3|11|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Eph.3.11">iii. 
11</scripRef>.</p></note></p>
<h2 id="iv.i-p70.3">IMPROVEMENT.</h2>
<p class="normal" id="iv.i-p71">I. We learn, particularly from the third observation, what an 
ample foundation is laid in the work of redemption, for the highest and endless 
gratitude of the redeemed.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.i-p72">As in the work of redemption is the highest exercise and most 
perfect and glorious display of divine, infinite benevolence, in delivering from 
infinite, deserved evil, and bestowing infinite, undeserved good and happiness; <pb n="321" id="iv.i-Page_321" />
by such infinite labour, cost and suffering’s of the Son of God, the redeemed are 
laid under infinite and endless obligations; suited to excite the highest exercise 
of that gratitude which consists in a proper view, sense and admiration of this 
benevolence and goodness of God, and in feeling and expressing their obligations 
to him, in eternal thanksgiving and praise. And in this a great part of the beauty, 
glory and happiness of the redeemed church will consist. In order to raise creatures 
to the highest happiness, there must not only be objects in the best manner suited 
to excite the exercises of benevolent and complacential love; but they must be in 
circumstances suited to call forth the warmest, and most sweet exercises of grateful 
love to him, who by his sovereign goodness has laid them under the greatest obligations. 
The work of redemption is in the highest degree suited to this; and the redeemed 
will be forever immensely more happy in the exercise of this sweet happifying love, 
than any creatures could have been had not the redemption of man taken place. This 
will be the sweet, animating subject of the <i>new song</i> which none but the redeemed 
can learn, and which they will sing with increasing delight forever. “O give 
thanks unto the Lord, for he is good; for his mercy endureth forever. Let the redeemed 
of the Lord say so.”<note n="240" id="iv.i-p72.1"><p class="normal" id="iv.i-p73"><scripRef id="iv.i-p73.1" passage="Psalm cvii. 1" parsed="|Ps|107|1|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Ps.107.1">Psalm cvii. 1</scripRef>, <scripRef passage="Psalm 107:2" id="iv.i-p73.2" parsed="|Ps|107|2|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Ps.107.2">2</scripRef>.</p></note> They will <i>say so</i> forever 
with unceasing, growing pleasure. In this, in a great measure, the happiness of 
heaven will consist.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.i-p74">II. We also learn from the fourth particular, and what has been 
said to illustrate it, that they have made a great mistake, who have thought that 
the divine goodness and grace do not appear so great in the pardon and salvation 
of sinners for Christ’s sake; it being obtained and procured by his suffering in 
their stead, and hereby making atonement for their sins; as it would, had pardon 
and salvation been granted without any such consideration, as that of the atonement 
and merits of Christ.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.i-p75">It appears from what has been said above, that the salvation of 
sinners by the obedience and sufferings of Christ, is so far from rendering the 
benevolence and <pb n="322" id="iv.i-Page_322" />grace of God less in saving them, that it enhances 
and magnifies the divine goodness to an amazing degree. Could sinners have been 
saved without such a Mediator, and such atonement as he has made, consistent with 
the honour of divine government, and the greatest good of the universe; their pardon 
and salvation would have required and manifested very little benevolence, compared 
with that which is exercised and appears in their salvation, when it could not be 
effected consistent with wisdom and righteousness without the humiliation, obedience 
and sufferings of the Son of God; as has been observed and shown above. How contrary 
to all reason and truth, how very absurd is it to assert or suppose, that divine 
grace in the salvation of men, is greatly lessened and obscured by the Son of God 
suffering the curse in their stead, and making atonement for them that they might 
be delivered and saved, consistent with rectitude and wisdom!</p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.i-p76">A number of the subjects of a certain king rebelled against him, 
were apprehended, and justly condemned to die for their crime. The circumstances 
of the case were such that they could not be pardoned consistent with the proper 
support of government, and the good of the kingdom, unless the king’s only son, 
who was the most honourable and excellent person in the kingdom, and whom he loved 
as himself, should willingly take their place, and die in their stead. The son consented 
and chose to do it, in order to obtain pardon for them. The king himself made the 
proposal, and was well pleased with his son’s readiness to die for them; and freely 
gave him up to the most ignominious and painful death, that he might, consistent 
with propriety and wisdom, pardon those rebels, who deserved themselves to die.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.i-p77">An equal number of the subjects of another king were condemned 
to a deserved death for rebellion. But the case was such that they might be pardoned 
and restored to favour, consistent with the support of government, and the highest 
good and happiness of his kingdom, without any one dying in their stead. He therefore 
gave them a free and full pardon, and restored them to the enjoyment of life and 
liberty in his kingdom.</p>
<pb n="323" id="iv.i-Page_323" />
<p class="normal" id="iv.i-p78">Shall it now be asked, Which of these kings exercised and expressed 
the most, the highest degree of benevolence or grace towards the rebels, in pardoning 
and saving them from deserved death? It is presumed no . rational creature, who 
will properly attend to the case, can possibly hesitate a moment; but must pronounce 
the former to have exerted and discovered unspeakably more benevolence and goodness, 
than the latter; and that die latter is inconsiderable and as nothing, compared 
with the former.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.i-p79">How then can any one, in the instance before us, which is in all 
respects infinitely more grand, clear and striking, say or imagine there would have 
been more grace manifested in the pardon and salvation of sinners, if this could 
have taken place, without an atonement by the Son of God dying for them, and no 
such sufferings had been necessary! How can any man suppose this without contradicting 
the reason of man, and the clearest dictates and feelings of common sense!</p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.i-p80">III. How great is their guilt who slight and oppose the great 
and wonderful works of God in the redemption of man; who neglect this great salvation, 
and abuse this highest and most astonishing instance of the goodness of God! All 
are under this awfully aggravated guilt, who do not thankfully embrace this salvation 
which is freely offered to all. And this is the great and chief aggravation of all 
the sins of men under the gospel, that they express or imply a rejection of Jesus 
Christ, who has procured, and offers salvation to them; and a refusal to believe 
on him. Therefore he says, when the Holy Spirit reproves mankind of sin, he discovers 
that it all consists in unbelief, and is an expression of that, and because they 
believe not on him.<note n="241" id="iv.i-p80.1"><p class="normal" id="iv.i-p81"><scripRef id="iv.i-p81.1" passage="John xvi. 8" parsed="|John|16|8|0|0" osisRef="Bible:John.16.8">John xvi. 8</scripRef>, <scripRef passage="John 16:9" id="iv.i-p81.2" parsed="|John|16|9|0|0" osisRef="Bible:John.16.9">9</scripRef>.</p></note> Every sin is a sin of unbelief, 
as it opposes the Saviour, and is a rejection of him, and in this the great and 
chief criminality of it does consist. Had there been no Saviour for man, and no 
redemption, he would be justly punished forever for his sin against God, as his 
rebellion deserved this infinitely great evil. But the sins of man in this case 
would have been as nothing compared with what their sins now are who live under 
the gospel, and oppose, <pb n="324" id="iv.i-Page_324" />slight and abuse all that astonishing benevolence 
and grace of God and the Redeemer, which is exercised and expressed in the work 
of redemption. The rebellion and obstinacy of a creature is aggravated and rendered 
more criminal by every instance and degree of benevolence and kindness exercised 
towards him by his Creator, as every instance of his goodness increases the obligation 
of the creature to love and obey him, and that in proportion to the greatness and 
degree of that goodness. Hence it follows that man is laid under the greatest obligations 
to love and obedience by redemption, and the benevolence of God exercised therein; 
which is by far the greatest, and most remarkable and affecting instance of love 
that has been shown to creatures, or of which we can have any conception; consequently 
an obstinate refusal to embrace this salvation, and abuse of all this goodness, 
is the greatest and most aggravated crime that men can commit, and swallows up all 
other supposeable crimes, as nothing in comparison with this.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.i-p82">And this discovers the great and total depravity of man, and the 
exceeding wickedness of the human heart, in that it has so much enmity against God 
and his laws, and is so hard and obstinate, as not to be won by such love and kindness; 
but is disposed to slight God the more for all his love, and to abuse and trample 
upon Christ, and all the grace discovered in the gospel. Scripture and experience 
join to teach us that man can do this, and that all have done it, who have had opportunity; 
and that all would persevere in this most aggravated wickedness, whatever methods 
were taken to reclaim them, did not God by his immediate, almighty power interpose, 
and take away the rebellious heart, and give a new obedient heart.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.i-p83">IV. From this subject, and particularly from the foregoing remark, 
we are led to reflect upon the ignorance and insensibility of persons who live under 
the gospel, of their greatest crime and guilt. They in general will acknowledge 
that they are sinners; some are led to this acknowledgment from their living and 
being educated where it is granted and inculcated that all men are sinners, and 
this confession is constantly made <pb n="325" id="iv.i-Page_325" />in public; and where particular 
practices, of which they know they are guilty, are considered and condemned as wrong 
and sinful. Others are convinced in their consciences that they are guilty of many 
actions which are forbidden in the Bible, and that they live in the neglect of many 
duties which are there commanded; and that therefore they are criminal. But few 
have any conviction of the evil nature of sin in general; and especially of the
<i>greatest</i> sin, and which is the chief aggravation of all their sins, viz. 
their opposition to Jesus Christ, and constant abuse of the grace revealed in the 
gospel. Most men who live in gospel light are so far from feeling themselves guilty 
of any crime by not embracing the Saviour, that they have not the least idea of 
this, and stand ready to oppose it, and to exculpate themselves, when they are charged 
with it, and the magnitude of the crime is laid before them: And they cannot be 
brought to a proper conviction of their crime and guilt in this, by any arguments 
and light which may be set before them; or by all possible means that may be used 
with them. This leads to another inference.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.i-p84">V. Hence we see the reason why our great Prophet and Teacher has 
represented it as the work of the Holy Spirit to convince men of this sin, and cause 
them to be thoroughly reproved for it. He says, “And when he (the Holy Spirit) is 
come, he will reprove the world of sin, <i>because they believe not on me</i>.”<note n="242" id="iv.i-p84.1"><p class="normal" id="iv.i-p85">
<scripRef id="iv.i-p85.1" passage="John xvi. 8" parsed="|John|16|8|0|0" osisRef="Bible:John.16.8">John xvi. 8</scripRef>, <scripRef passage="John 16:9" id="iv.i-p85.2" parsed="|John|16|9|0|0" osisRef="Bible:John.16.9">9</scripRef>.</p></note> Nothing short of the almighty agency of the Holy Spirit, 
renewing the heart, and forming it to true discerning in spiritual things, can produce 
this conviction and efficacious reproof. The criminal darkness and delusion which 
is essential to the reign of sin in the heart cannot be removed by any agent but 
the Holy Spirit giving a new heart which admits the true light, and sees and confesses 
the exceeding sinfulness of the human heart, this being the fountain and seat of 
all sin; and especially the great sin of all sins, the chief of all crimes, the 
sin of <i>unbelief</i>, in rejecting and abusing Jesus Christ, and the love and 
grace exhibited in him. When men have such an heart given them, they will submit 
to the divine reproof: confess this sin, and feel and own that they are wholly <pb n="326" id="iv.i-Page_326" />
without any excuse for not believing on Christ: That in this they have been monsters 
of wickedness, which has been expressed in all the sins they have committed; and 
thus they will <i>humble themselves in the sight of God</i>, and fly to the Redeemer 
for refuge, for pardon and redemption.</p>

</div2>

<div2 title="Chapter II. Concerning the Person and Character of the Redeemer." prev="iv.i" next="iv.iii" id="iv.ii">

<h2 id="iv.ii-p0.1">CHAP. II.</h2>
<h3 id="iv.ii-p0.2">CONCERNING THE PERSON AND CHARACTER OF THE REDEEMER.</h3>
<p class="normal" id="iv.ii-p1">WELL may we, with fear and trembling, enter upon this high and 
important subject, the person and character of the Redeemer of men. This person 
is so great and wonderful, that he passes knowledge; and so does his character, 
consequently; which is singular, and infinitely distinguished from all others, being 
excellent and glorious beyond conception. And yet there is no salvation for men, 
without a degree of true knowledge of his person and character; and such knowledge 
is connected with eternal life. “This is life eternal, that they might know thee, 
the only true God, and Jesus Christ, whom thou hast sent.”<note n="243" id="iv.ii-p1.1"><p class="normal" id="iv.ii-p2"><scripRef id="iv.ii-p2.1" passage="John xvii. 3" parsed="|John|17|3|0|0" osisRef="Bible:John.17.3">John xvii. 3</scripRef>.</p></note></p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.ii-p3">He who knows Jesus Christ, the Son of God, knows God. He therefore 
said to one of his disciples, “Have I been so long time with you, and yet hast thou 
not known <i>me</i>? He that hath seen me, hath seen the Father.”<note n="244" id="iv.ii-p3.1"><p class="normal" id="iv.ii-p4"><scripRef id="iv.ii-p4.1" passage="John xiv. 9" parsed="|John|14|9|0|0" osisRef="Bible:John.14.9">John xiv. 
9</scripRef>.</p></note> The knowledge of Jesus Christ is the sum of all christian knowledge, and 
includes the whole of true divinity. Hence St. Paul says to christians at Corinth, “I determined not to know any thing among you, save Jesus Christ crucified.”<note n="245" id="iv.ii-p4.2"><p class="normal" id="iv.ii-p5">
<scripRef id="iv.ii-p5.1" passage="1 Cor. ii. 2" parsed="|1Cor|2|2|0|0" osisRef="Bible:1Cor.2.2">1 Cor. ii. 2</scripRef>.</p></note> And again, “Yea, and I count all things but loss, for the excellency 
of the knowledge of Christ Jesus my Lord: That I may <i>know him</i>.”<note n="246" id="iv.ii-p5.2"><p class="normal" id="iv.ii-p6"><scripRef id="iv.ii-p6.1" passage="Phil. iii. 8" parsed="|Phil|3|8|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Phil.3.8">Phil. 
iii. 8</scripRef>, <scripRef passage="Phil 3:10" id="iv.ii-p6.2" parsed="|Phil|3|10|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Phil.3.10">10</scripRef>.</p></note> The apostle Peter exhorts christians to strive to make advances, 
and to increase in the knowledge of this person. “<i>Grow</i> in grace, and in the 
knowledge of our Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ.”<note n="247" id="iv.ii-p6.3"><p class="normal" id="iv.ii-p7">2 Pet. ii. 18.</p></note><pb n="327" id="iv.ii-Page_327" />
This is an endless theme, an inexhaustible subject, which the redeemed will study 
and explore forever, and will grow and increase in the knowledge of this boundless, 
glorious, and most entertaining object, with unspeakable and ever fresh delight 
and joy, without any end. Happy are they who with St. Paul have the true revelation 
of Jesus Christ; it will lead them on, in the only path of wisdom, to endless stores 
of knowledge and happiness; when they shall be where he is, and <i>behold his glory</i>: 
dwelling in the New Jerusalem, whereof the Son of God, the Lamb, shall shine forever 
with increasing lustre, and be the light thereof. But they who have not the true 
knowledge of Christ are exposed to run into error and fatal delusions respecting 
this person, and while they profess to acknowledge and honour him, really deny and 
reject him. This was the case with the Jews, when the Son of God was in the flesh 
on earth. “For they that dwelt at Jerusalem, and their rulers, <i>because they knew 
him not</i>, nor yet the voices of the prophets, which were read every Sabbath day, 
they have fulfilled them in condemning him.”<note n="248" id="iv.ii-p7.1"><p class="normal" id="iv.ii-p8"><scripRef id="iv.ii-p8.1" passage="Acts xiii. 27" parsed="|Acts|13|27|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Acts.13.27">Acts xiii. 27</scripRef>.</p></note> 
This proved fatal to them, of which our Lord warned them, when he told them, “If 
ye believe not <i>that I am he</i>, ye shall die in your sins.”<note n="249" id="iv.ii-p8.2"><p class="normal" id="iv.ii-p9"><scripRef id="iv.ii-p9.1" passage="John viii. 24" parsed="|John|8|24|0|0" osisRef="Bible:John.8.24">John viii. 
24</scripRef>.</p></note> And there soon arose in the christian church those who denied the Lord 
that bought them, even our Lord Jesus Christ.<note n="250" id="iv.ii-p9.2"><p class="normal" id="iv.ii-p10"><scripRef passage="2Pet 2:1" id="iv.ii-p10.1" parsed="|2Pet|2|1|0|0" osisRef="Bible:2Pet.2.1">
2 Pet. ii. 1</scripRef>. <scripRef passage="Jude 1:4" id="iv.ii-p10.2" parsed="|Jude|1|4|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Jude.1.4">Jude 4</scripRef>.</p></note> 
And as ignorance of the person of Jesus Christ, and mistakes respecting his real 
character, were so dangerous and fatal to Jews and professing christians, in that 
day, they have been equally so in every age since, down to this day; and will be 
as mischievous to us, if we are so criminal and unhappy as to imbibe them, or any 
other, as contrary to the truth.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.ii-p11">Professing christians have differed, perhaps, in nothing so much 
as they have about the person and character of Jesus Christ. The opinions which 
have been imbibed and professed are so many and various, that it would take volumes, 
and be an almost endless task, particularly to mention and describe them; which 
, therefore, will not be undertaken here. All that will be attempted, is to ascertain 
the truth, as revealed in the <pb n="328" id="iv.ii-Page_328" />holy scriptures, concerning this high 
and important point, and great mystery of godliness, <i>God manifest in the flesh</i>.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.ii-p12">The variety of different sentiments and gross errors into which 
men have run on this point, to their own destruction, have not been owing to any 
darkness or defect in divine revelation, respecting this. We may be certain that 
the person and character of the Redeemer is there so fully, and with so much perspicuity 
ascertained and fixed, that every honest, unprejudiced person, who is willing to 
know and embrace the truth, and will properly study the Bible, will come to the 
knowledge of the truth, and form right conceptions of Jesus Christ, in every important 
article respecting him. All the mistakes and errors, therefore, which have been 
embraced on this point, have originated from the evil biases, prejudices, and inattention 
of sinful man, together with the influence which Satan, “who deceives the 
whole world,” has been suffered to exert on the minds of men. The depraved minds 
of men love darkness rather than the light; yea, hate the. truth; and are more ready 
to embrace error and delusion, than the pure truth, with relation to the Redeemer: 
And Satan, the great enemy of Christ, and of men, is unwearied in his attempts to 
blind and deceive them, especially respecting the Saviour, and lead them to embrace 
damnable errors concerning him, and such as are very dishonourable to him, and rob 
him of all his glory, as the Redeemer of sinners. This will fully account for the 
various and multiplied errors which have been, at one time and another, invented 
and propagated in the christian world, consistent with the utmost clearness and 
perfection of divine revelation on this head.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.ii-p13">Ever since the gospel has been preached to the world to this day, 
the person and character of Christ, Christ crucified, has been to the Jews a stumbling 
block, and to the Gentiles foolishness: To all the unbelieving and disobedient he 
has been, and is now, and will continue to be, “a stone of stumbling and rock of 
offence.” While to them who believe he is precious, the only sure foundation, and 
chief corner stone, on <pb n="329" id="iv.ii-Page_329" />whom they build all their hopes. These true 
friends to Christ do know him, having some degree of true acquaintance with his 
person and character: But their knowledge is very imperfect, and, it is to be feared, 
in most, if not all of them, is attended with great darkness, and more or less mistakes 
and wrong conceptions of him. This, however, is no matter of discouragement to attend 
to this subject with great care, diligence and circumspection; but rather a weighty 
motive to it; and to attempt to confirm the truth, and throw all the light upon 
it which may have been obtained, by a long and careful study of the holy scriptures; 
leaving it with them who shall come after with more clear heads, better hearts, 
and a more unprejudiced, and engaged study of the Bible, to detect the mistakes 
which may now be made, and remove present darkness, by bringing forth more abundant 
light from the divine oracles, on this important subject.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.ii-p14">It is not designed to attempt a particular refutation of any of 
the many different opinions which have been advanced concerning the person of the 
Redeemer, or to answer all the objections which have been made to that representation 
which shall now be given as warranted by the scriptures of truth; since stating 
the truth, and supporting it by divine revelation, is the shortest and most effectual 
way to discover and confute the opposite errors, and silence all the objections 
which have been made to it</p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.ii-p15">The following things appear to be revealed in the holy scriptures, 
concerning this wonderful person; and therefore may be safely believed and asserted.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.ii-p16">I. <span class="sc" id="iv.ii-p16.1">That Jesus Christ</span>, the Redeemer of 
men, is truly God, or a divine person. This has been so much insisted upon, and 
abundantly proved from scripture, by so many writers, that it is needless to attend 
here to all the evidence there is of this truth in scripture. It will be sufficient 
briefly to note the following particulars.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.ii-p17">1. This is expressly asserted of him, and he is often called God 
in the Scripture. The following passages are instances of this. “In the beginning 
was the Word, and the Word was with God, <i>and the Word was God</i>.” This is the 
Word, which took flesh, or the human <pb n="330" id="iv.ii-Page_330" />nature, into a personal union 
with himself. “And the Word was made flesh, and dwelt among us; and we beheld his 
glory, the glory of the only begotten Son of the Father.”<note n="251" id="iv.ii-p17.1"><p class="normal" id="iv.ii-p18"><scripRef id="iv.ii-p18.1" passage="John i. 1" parsed="|John|1|1|0|0" osisRef="Bible:John.1.1">John i. 1</scripRef>, <scripRef passage="John 1:14" id="iv.ii-p18.2" parsed="|John|1|14|0|0" osisRef="Bible:John.1.14">14</scripRef>.</p></note> 
The Word, which is asserted to be God, is the second person in the Trinity. “There 
are three that bear record in heaven, the Father, the Word, and the Holy Ghost.”<note n="252" id="iv.ii-p18.3"><p class="normal" id="iv.ii-p19">
<scripRef id="iv.ii-p19.1" passage="1 John v. 7" parsed="|1John|5|7|0|0" osisRef="Bible:1John.5.7">1 John v. 7</scripRef>.</p></note> Therefore, “his name is called the Word of God.”<note n="253" id="iv.ii-p19.2"><p class="normal" id="iv.ii-p20"><scripRef id="iv.ii-p20.1" passage="Rev. xix. 13" parsed="|Rev|19|13|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Rev.19.13">Rev. 
xix. 13</scripRef>.</p></note> “Unto us a Child is born, unto us a Son is given, and the 
government shall be upon his shoulders: And his name shall be called, Wonderful, 
Counsellor, <span class="sc" id="iv.ii-p20.2">The mighty God</span>.”<note n="254" id="iv.ii-p20.3"><p class="normal" id="iv.ii-p21"><scripRef id="iv.ii-p21.1" passage="Isaiah ix. 6" parsed="|Isa|9|6|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Isa.9.6">Isaiah ix. 6</scripRef>,</p></note> 
“And this is the name whereby he shall be called: The Lord (<span class="sc" id="iv.ii-p21.2">Jehovah</span>) 
our righteousness.”<note n="255" id="iv.ii-p21.3"><p class="normal" id="iv.ii-p22"><scripRef id="iv.ii-p22.1" passage="Jer. xxiii. 6" parsed="|Jer|23|6|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Jer.23.6">Jer. xxiii. 6</scripRef>.</p></note> “Behold, a virgin shall be 
with child, and shall bring forth a Son, and they shall call his name
<span class="sc" id="iv.ii-p22.2">Emanuel</span>, which, being interpreted, is God with us.”<note n="256" id="iv.ii-p22.3"><p class="normal" id="iv.ii-p23">
<scripRef id="iv.ii-p23.1" passage="Matt. i. 23" parsed="|Matt|1|23|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Matt.1.23">Matt. i. 23</scripRef>. <scripRef passage="Isa 7:14" id="iv.ii-p23.2" parsed="|Isa|7|14|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Isa.7.14">Isaiah vii. 14</scripRef>.</p></note> “And 
Thomas answered and said unto him, My Lord, and my God.”<note n="257" id="iv.ii-p23.3"><p class="normal" id="iv.ii-p24"><scripRef id="iv.ii-p24.1" passage="John xx. 28" parsed="|John|20|28|0|0" osisRef="Bible:John.20.28">John xx. 28</scripRef>.</p></note> 
“Whose are the fathers, and of whom, as concerning the flesh, Christ came, who is 
over all, God blessed forever.”<note n="258" id="iv.ii-p24.2"><p class="normal" id="iv.ii-p25"><scripRef id="iv.ii-p25.1" passage="Rom. ix. 5" parsed="|Rom|9|5|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Rom.9.5">Rom. ix. 5</scripRef>.</p></note> “Looking for that blessed 
hope, and glorious appearing of the great God, and our Saviour Jesus Christ.”<note n="259" id="iv.ii-p25.2"><p class="normal" id="iv.ii-p26">
<scripRef id="iv.ii-p26.1" passage="Tit. ii. 13" parsed="|Titus|2|13|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Titus.2.13">Tit. ii. 13</scripRef>.</p></note> The words in the original might, with propriety, be rendered
<i>Our Great God and Saviour</i>. Mr. Fleming, in support of this interpretation, 
observes, that we never read of the Father’s appearance.<note n="260" id="iv.ii-p26.2"><p class="normal" id="iv.ii-p27">Doddridge’s Note 
on the place.</p></note> 
“Through the righteousness of our God, and Saviour Jesus Christ.”<note n="261" id="iv.ii-p27.1"><p class="normal" id="iv.ii-p28">2 Pet. i. 
1.</p></note> “But unto the Son, he saith. Thy throne, O God, is forever and ever.”<note n="262" id="iv.ii-p28.1"><p class="normal" id="iv.ii-p29">
<scripRef id="iv.ii-p29.1" passage="Heb. i. 8" parsed="|Heb|1|8|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Heb.1.8">Heb. i. 8</scripRef>.</p></note> “Great is the mystery of godliness; God was manifest in the flesh.”<note n="263" id="iv.ii-p29.2"><p class="normal" id="iv.ii-p30">
<scripRef id="iv.ii-p30.1" passage="1 Tim. iii. 16" parsed="|1Tim|3|16|0|0" osisRef="Bible:1Tim.3.16">1 Tim. iii. 16</scripRef>.</p></note></p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.ii-p31">2. What is in one part of the Bible said of Jehovah, and ascribed 
to him, as the only true God, this being the name which is appropriated to him in 
distinction from all other beings, is, in other passages, ascribed to the Redeemer 
of man, Jesus Christ, and applied to him.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.ii-p32">“Mine eyes have seen the King, the Lord (<span class="sc" id="iv.ii-p32.1">Jehovah</span>) 
of hosts.”<note n="264" id="iv.ii-p32.2"><p class="normal" id="iv.ii-p33"><scripRef id="iv.ii-p33.1" passage="Isaiah vi. 5" parsed="|Isa|6|5|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Isa.6.5">Isaiah vi. 5</scripRef>.</p></note> This <span class="sc" id="iv.ii-p33.2">Jehovah</span>, Lord 
of hosts, is said by St. John to be Jesus Christ, as he applies this passage <pb n="331" id="iv.ii-Page_331" />
to him—“These things, said Isaiah, when he saw his (Christ’s) glory, <i>and spake 
of him</i>.”<note n="265" id="iv.ii-p33.3"><p class="normal" id="iv.ii-p34"><scripRef id="iv.ii-p34.1" passage="John xii. 41" parsed="|John|12|41|0|0" osisRef="Bible:John.12.41">John xii. 41</scripRef>.</p></note></p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.ii-p35">“Thus saith the Lord, the King of Israel, and his Redeemer, the 
Lord of hosts, I am the <i>first, and I am the last</i>, and besides me there is 
no God.”<note n="266" id="iv.ii-p35.1"><p class="normal" id="iv.ii-p36"><scripRef id="iv.ii-p36.1" passage="Isaiah xliv. 6" parsed="|Isa|44|6|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Isa.44.6">Isaiah xliv. 6</scripRef>.</p></note> Here Jehovah takes this character to himself, 
as peculiar to him. The <span class="sc" id="iv.ii-p36.2">first</span>, and the <span class="sc" id="iv.ii-p36.3">
last</span>. But Jesus Christ, the Redeemer of the true Israel, the church; who 
redeems his people from the curse of the law, by his blood, takes this same character 
to himself, and therefore must himself be <span class="sc" id="iv.ii-p36.4">Jehovah</span>, besides 
whom there is no God. “I (Jesus Christ) am Alpha and Omega, the beginning and the 
end, the <span class="sc" id="iv.ii-p36.5">first</span> and the <span class="sc" id="iv.ii-p36.6">last</span>.”<note n="267" id="iv.ii-p36.7"><p class="normal" id="iv.ii-p37">
<scripRef id="iv.ii-p37.1" passage="Rev. xxii. 13" parsed="|Rev|22|13|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Rev.22.13">Rev. xxii. 13</scripRef>.</p></note> This same person takes this to himself repeatedly in the first 
chapter of this book, “saying, I am Alpha and Omega, the <span class="sc" id="iv.ii-p37.2">first</span> 
and <span class="sc" id="iv.ii-p37.3">last</span>.”<note n="268" id="iv.ii-p37.4"><p class="normal" id="iv.ii-p38"><scripRef passage="Rev 22:11" id="iv.ii-p38.1" parsed="|Rev|22|11|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Rev.22.11">Verse 11</scripRef>.</p></note> 
“I am the <span class="sc" id="iv.ii-p38.2">first</span> and the <span class="sc" id="iv.ii-p38.3">last</span>: I 
am he that liveth, and was dead, and, behold, I am alive forevermore.”<note n="269" id="iv.ii-p38.4"><p class="normal" id="iv.ii-p39"><scripRef passage="Rev 22:17" id="iv.ii-p39.1" parsed="|Rev|22|17|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Rev.22.17">
Ver. 17</scripRef>.</p></note> “I am Alpha and Omega, the beginning and the ending, 
saith the Lord, which is, and which was, and which is to come, the
<span class="sc" id="iv.ii-p39.2">Almighty</span>.”<note n="270" id="iv.ii-p39.3"><p class="normal" id="iv.ii-p40"><scripRef passage="Rev 22:8" id="iv.ii-p40.1" parsed="|Rev|22|8|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Rev.22.8">Ver. 8</scripRef>.</p></note> 
“I, even I, am the Lord, <i>and besides me there is no </i><span class="sc" id="iv.ii-p40.2">Saviour</span>.”<note n="271" id="iv.ii-p40.3"><p class="normal" id="iv.ii-p41">
<scripRef id="iv.ii-p41.1" passage="Isaiah xliii. 11" parsed="|Isa|43|11|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Isa.43.11">Isaiah xliii. 11</scripRef>.</p></note> This title and character, which <span class="sc" id="iv.ii-p41.2">Jehovah</span> 
takes to himself, exclusive of all others, the <span class="sc" id="iv.ii-p41.3">Saviour</span> of 
Israel, his church and people, is constantly given to Jesus Christ in the New Testament. 
He is called Jesus, which signifies a Saviour, because he saves his people from 
their sins.<note n="272" id="iv.ii-p41.4"><p class="normal" id="iv.ii-p42"><scripRef id="iv.ii-p42.1" passage="Matt. i. 21" parsed="|Matt|1|21|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Matt.1.21">Matt. i. 21</scripRef>.</p></note> “Christ is the head of the church, and he 
is the <span class="sc" id="iv.ii-p42.2">Saviour</span> of the body,” that is, the church.<note n="273" id="iv.ii-p42.3"><p class="normal" id="iv.ii-p43">
<scripRef id="iv.ii-p43.1" passage="Eph. v. 28" parsed="|Eph|5|28|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Eph.5.28">Eph. v. 28</scripRef>.</p></note> He is called, “our Lord and <span class="sc" id="iv.ii-p43.2">Saviour</span> 
Jesus Christ.”<note n="274" id="iv.ii-p43.3"><p class="normal" id="iv.ii-p44"><scripRef id="iv.ii-p44.1" passage="2 Peter i. 11" parsed="|2Pet|1|11|0|0" osisRef="Bible:2Pet.1.11">2 Peter i. 11</scripRef>. <scripRef passage="2Peter 2:20" id="iv.ii-p44.2" parsed="|2Pet|2|20|0|0" osisRef="Bible:2Pet.2.20">ii. 20</scripRef>. <scripRef passage="2Peter 3:2,18" id="iv.ii-p44.3" parsed="|2Pet|3|2|0|0;|2Pet|3|18|0|0" osisRef="Bible:2Pet.3.2 Bible:2Pet.3.18">
iii. 2, 18</scripRef>.</p></note> This title is given to him in other places, too many 
to be particularly recited. And this is needless, since one instance of his being 
called, by way of eminence, the <span class="sc" id="iv.ii-p44.4">Saviour</span>, is sufficient to 
prove the point now in view. It may be proper and useful, however, under this head,. 
to observe, that as this title. The <span class="sc" id="iv.ii-p44.5">Saviour</span>, is claimed 
as peculiar to <span class="sc" id="iv.ii-p44.6">Jehovah</span>, the only true God, in the passage 
just quoted from Isaiah; and since Jesus Christ is called God, and asserted to be 
God, in many instances, which have been mentioned <pb n="332" id="iv.ii-Page_332" />above, we are hence 
warranted to apply the expression, <span class="sc" id="iv.ii-p44.7">God our Saviour</span>, which 
is so often used, to Jesus the only Saviour and Redeemer of his church. Among other 
instances of this, the following may be particularly noted. “And Mary said, My soul 
doth magnify the Lord, and my spirit hath rejoiced in <i>God</i>
<span class="sc" id="iv.ii-p44.8">my Saviour</span>. For unto you is born this day, in the city of 
David, a <span class="sc" id="iv.ii-p44.9">Saviour</span>, which is Christ the Lord.”<note n="275" id="iv.ii-p44.10"><p class="normal" id="iv.ii-p45"><scripRef id="iv.ii-p45.1" passage="Luke i. 45" parsed="|Luke|1|45|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Luke.1.45">Luke 
i. 45</scripRef>, <scripRef passage="Luke 1:47" id="iv.ii-p45.2" parsed="|Luke|1|47|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Luke.1.47">47</scripRef>. <scripRef passage="Luke 2:11" id="iv.ii-p45.3" parsed="|Luke|2|11|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Luke.2.11">ii. 11</scripRef>.</p></note> “According to 
the commandment of God <span class="sc" id="iv.ii-p45.4">our Saviour</span>, That they may adorn 
the doctrine of God <span class="sc" id="iv.ii-p45.5">our Saviour</span> in all things. Our great 
God and <span class="sc" id="iv.ii-p45.6">Saviour</span> Jesus Christ. But after the kindness and 
love of God and our Saviour appeared.<note n="276" id="iv.ii-p45.7"><p class="normal" id="iv.ii-p46"><scripRef id="iv.ii-p46.1" passage="Tit. i. 3" parsed="|Titus|1|3|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Titus.1.3">Tit. i. 3</scripRef>. <scripRef passage="Tit 2:10,13" id="iv.ii-p46.2" parsed="|Titus|2|10|0|0;|Titus|2|13|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Titus.2.10 Bible:Titus.2.13">
ii. 10, 13</scripRef>. <scripRef passage="Tit 3:4" id="iv.ii-p46.3" parsed="|Titus|3|4|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Titus.3.4">iii. 4</scripRef>.</p></note> Through 
the righteousness of our <span class="sc" id="iv.ii-p46.4">God and Saviour</span> Jesus Christ.”<note n="277" id="iv.ii-p46.5"><p class="normal" id="iv.ii-p47">
2 Pet. i. 1.</p></note> In our translation it is God <i>and our Saviour</i>, but this 
is not so agreeable to the original, as that now given. “Now unto him that is able 
to keep you from falling, and to <i>present you</i> faultless before the presence 
of his glory, with exceeding joy, <i>to the only wise God our Saviour</i>, be glory 
and majesty, dominion and power, both now and ever, Amen.”<note n="278" id="iv.ii-p47.1"><p class="normal" id="iv.ii-p48"><scripRef passage="Jude 1:24,25" id="iv.ii-p48.1" parsed="|Jude|1|24|1|25" osisRef="Bible:Jude.1.24-Jude.1.25">
Jude 24, 25</scripRef>.</p></note></p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.ii-p49">That Jesus Christ is the person here intended by <i>the only wise 
God our Saviour</i>, is farther evident, because this same thing is expressly ascribed 
to him by St. Paul. “That he (Christ) might <i>present it to himself</i>, a <i>glorious 
church</i>, not having spot or wrinkle, or any such thing; but that it should be 
holy, and without blemish.”<note n="279" id="iv.ii-p49.1"><p class="normal" id="iv.ii-p50"><scripRef id="iv.ii-p50.1" passage="Eph v. 27" parsed="|Eph|5|27|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Eph.5.27">Eph v. 27</scripRef>.</p></note></p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.ii-p51">Again, <span class="sc" id="iv.ii-p51.1">Jehovah</span>, the Lord of hosts, is 
called the <i>husband</i> of the church, and claims this relation, “Thy Maker is 
thine <i>husband</i>, the Lord of hosts is his name.”<note n="280" id="iv.ii-p51.2"><p class="normal" id="iv.ii-p52"><scripRef id="iv.ii-p52.1" passage="Isaiah liv. 5" parsed="|Isa|54|5|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Isa.54.5">Isaiah liv. 5</scripRef>.</p></note> 
“Thou shalt no more be termed forsaken, &amp;c. for the Lord delighteth in thee, and 
thy land shall be married—And as the bridegroom rejoiceth over the bride, so shall 
thy God rejoice over thee.”<note n="281" id="iv.ii-p52.2"><p class="normal" id="iv.ii-p53"><scripRef id="iv.ii-p53.1" passage="Isaiah lxii." parsed="|Isa|62|0|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Isa.62">Isaiah lxii.</scripRef>4, 5.</p></note> This same character and 
relation is ascribed to Jesus Christ. He is the bridegroom, the husband of the church. 
John Baptist, speaking of Christ, says, “He that hath the bride is the bridegroom.”<note n="282" id="iv.ii-p53.2"><p class="normal" id="iv.ii-p54">
<scripRef id="iv.ii-p54.1" passage="John iii. 29" parsed="|John|3|29|0|0" osisRef="Bible:John.3.29">John iii. 29</scripRef>.</p></note> St. Paul says to the <pb n="333" id="iv.ii-Page_333" />Corinthian church, “I have 
espoused you to <i>one husband</i>, that I may present you a chaste virgin to Christ.”<note n="283" id="iv.ii-p54.2"><p class="normal" id="iv.ii-p55">
<scripRef id="iv.ii-p55.1" passage="2 Cor. xi. 2" parsed="|2Cor|11|2|0|0" osisRef="Bible:2Cor.11.2">2 Cor. xi. 2</scripRef>.</p></note> St. John heard them rejoicing in heaven, and saying, “The
<i>marriage of the Lamb is come</i>, and his wife (the church) hath made herself 
ready.”<note n="284" id="iv.ii-p55.2"><p class="normal" id="iv.ii-p56"><scripRef id="iv.ii-p56.1" passage="Rev. xix. 7" parsed="|Rev|19|7|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Rev.19.7">Rev. xix. 7</scripRef>.</p></note> “And I saw the holy city, New Jerusalem, (which 
is the church) coming down from God out of heaven, prepared as a bride adorned for 
her <i>husband</i>. And there came unto me one of the seven angels, and talked with 
me, saying, come hither, I will shew thee the bride, <i>the Lamb’s wife</i>.”<note n="285" id="iv.ii-p56.2"><p class="normal" id="iv.ii-p57">
<scripRef id="iv.ii-p57.1" passage="Rev. xxi. 2" parsed="|Rev|21|2|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Rev.21.2">Rev. xxi. 2</scripRef>, <scripRef passage="Rev 21:9" id="iv.ii-p57.2" parsed="|Rev|21|9|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Rev.21.9">9</scripRef>.</p></note> Thus it appears that <span class="sc" id="iv.ii-p57.3">Jehovah</span>, the 
only true God, is the church’s husband; and so is Jesus Christ. Therefore Jesus 
Christ is <span class="sc" id="iv.ii-p57.4">Jehovah</span>; or the only true God, and Jesus Christ, 
are the same: For the church hath not, and cannot have <i>two husbands</i>: Nor 
are there two brides or wives, who can each of them have a husband: For there is 
but <i>one</i> church; but <i>one</i> bride, who, as a chaste virgin, is espoused 
to <i>one</i> husband, Jesus Christ. “There is <span class="sc" id="iv.ii-p57.5">one</span> 
body,” that is, the church, of which Christ is the only head and husband.<note n="286" id="iv.ii-p57.6"><p class="normal" id="iv.ii-p58">
<scripRef id="iv.ii-p58.1" passage="Eph. iv. 4" parsed="|Eph|4|4|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Eph.4.4">Eph. iv. 4</scripRef>.</p></note> “My dove, my undefiled, is <i>but </i><span class="sc" id="iv.ii-p58.2">one</span>.”<note n="287" id="iv.ii-p58.3"><p class="normal" id="iv.ii-p59">
<scripRef id="iv.ii-p59.1" passage="Cant. vi. 9" parsed="|Song|6|9|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Song.6.9">Cant. vi. 9</scripRef>.</p></note></p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.ii-p60">“Sanctify the Lord (<span class="sc" id="iv.ii-p60.1">Jehovah</span>) of hosts 
himself, and let <i>him</i> be your fear, and let <i>him</i> be your dread: And
<i>he</i> shall be for a sanctuary; but for a <i>stone of stumbling</i> and <i>for 
a rock of offence</i> to both the houses of Israel.”<note n="288" id="iv.ii-p60.2"><p class="normal" id="iv.ii-p61"><scripRef id="iv.ii-p61.1" passage="Isaiah viii. 13" parsed="|Isa|8|13|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Isa.8.13">Isaiah viii. 13</scripRef>, <scripRef passage="Isaiah 8:14" id="iv.ii-p61.2" parsed="|Isa|8|14|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Isa.8.14">14</scripRef>.</p></note> 
This, which is spoken of <span class="sc" id="iv.ii-p61.3">Jehovah</span>, is applied to Jesus Christ 
by St. Peter. “The stone which the builders disallowed, the same is made the head 
of the corner, and <i>a stone of stumbling</i> and <i>rock of offence</i>.”<note n="289" id="iv.ii-p61.4"><p class="normal" id="iv.ii-p62">
<scripRef id="iv.ii-p62.1" passage="1 Peter ii. 7" parsed="|1Pet|2|7|0|0" osisRef="Bible:1Pet.2.7">1 Peter ii. 7</scripRef>, <scripRef passage="1 Peter 2:8" id="iv.ii-p62.2" parsed="|1Pet|2|8|0|0" osisRef="Bible:1Pet.2.8">8</scripRef>.</p></note> It is said, “The Lord God of the holy prophets <i>sent 
his angel</i> to shew unto <i>his servants</i> the <i>things</i> which shortly must 
be done.”<note n="290" id="iv.ii-p62.3"><p class="normal" id="iv.ii-p63"><scripRef id="iv.ii-p63.1" passage="Rev. xxii. 6" parsed="|Rev|22|6|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Rev.22.6">Rev. xxii. 6</scripRef>.</p></note> And in the <scripRef passage="Rev 22:16" id="iv.ii-p63.2" parsed="|Rev|22|16|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Rev.22.16">sixteenth 
verse</scripRef> Jesus Christ says, “I Jesus <i>have sent mine Angel</i> to testify 
unto you <i>these things</i> in the <i>churches</i>.” Here the Lord God of the holy 
prophets, which must be <span class="sc" id="iv.ii-p63.3">Jehovah</span>, and Jesus Christ, are said 
to be the same thing. Therefore Jesus Christ and the Lord God, are one and the same.</p>
<pb n="334" id="iv.ii-Page_334" />
<p class="normal" id="iv.ii-p64">Not half the instances of this kind, which might be adduced under 
this head, have been mentioned; but these are enough, it is presumed, to illustrate 
and make evident to every attentive, impartial person, the truth of the particular 
observation, to prove which they have been cited.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.ii-p65">3. That Jesus Christ is God, is evident from the divine attributes 
being ascribed to him, even those which are peculiar to the Deity.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.ii-p66">Eternity, or existing without beginning, is ascribed to him. “But thou, Bethlehem—out of thee shall he come forth unto me, that is to be ruler 
of Israel, <i>whose goings forth have been from old, from everlasting</i>.”<note n="291" id="iv.ii-p66.1"><p class="normal" id="iv.ii-p67">
<scripRef id="iv.ii-p67.1" passage="Micah v. 2" parsed="|Mic|5|2|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Mic.5.2">Micah v. 2</scripRef>.</p></note> 
This is expressly applied to Christ.<note n="292" id="iv.ii-p67.2"><p class="normal" id="iv.ii-p68"><scripRef id="iv.ii-p68.1" passage="Matt. ii. 6" parsed="|Matt|2|6|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Matt.2.6">Matt. ii. 6</scripRef>.</p></note> He is represented 
in that remarkable type of him, Melchisedec, to be <i>without beginning of days</i>, 
or end of time.<note n="293" id="iv.ii-p68.2"><p class="normal" id="iv.ii-p69"><scripRef id="iv.ii-p69.1" passage="Heb. vii. 3" parsed="|Heb|7|3|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Heb.7.3">Heb. vii. 3</scripRef>.</p></note> He is “<i>the beginning and the ending, 
the first and the last, which is, and which was, and which is to come</i>.”<note n="294" id="iv.ii-p69.2"><p class="normal" id="iv.ii-p70">
<scripRef id="iv.ii-p70.1" passage="Rev. i. 8" parsed="|Rev|1|8|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Rev.1.8">Rev. i. 8</scripRef>, <scripRef passage="Rev 1:17" id="iv.ii-p70.2" parsed="|Rev|1|17|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Rev.1.17">17</scripRef>. <scripRef passage="Rev 22:13" id="iv.ii-p70.3" parsed="|Rev|22|13|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Rev.22.13">xxii. 13</scripRef>.</p></note> Which words 
strongly express eternal existence, without beginning or end.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.ii-p71"><i>Immutability</i> is ascribed to him, which is an attribute 
peculiar to God. Speaking to the Son of God, it is said, “Thou art <i>the same</i>,” 
as opposed to all changeable existence.<note n="295" id="iv.ii-p71.1"><p class="normal" id="iv.ii-p72"><scripRef id="iv.ii-p72.1" passage="Heb. i. 12" parsed="|Heb|1|12|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Heb.1.12">Heb. i. 12</scripRef>.</p></note> This is expressed 
more strongly in the following words, “Jesus Christ, the <i>same yesterday, to day, 
and forever</i>.”<note n="296" id="iv.ii-p72.2"><p class="normal" id="iv.ii-p73"><scripRef id="iv.ii-p73.1" passage="Heb. xiii. 8" parsed="|Heb|13|8|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Heb.13.8">Heb. xiii. 8</scripRef>.</p></note> Here both his eternity, his existence 
from everlasting to everlasting, and his immutability are expressed.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.ii-p74">He is <i>omnipotent</i>. “And Jesus came and spake unto them, 
saying, <i>All power</i> is given unto me, in heaven and in earth:”<note n="297" id="iv.ii-p74.1"><p class="normal" id="iv.ii-p75"><scripRef id="iv.ii-p75.1" passage="Matt. xxviii. 18" parsed="|Matt|28|18|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Matt.28.18">Matt. 
xxviii. 18</scripRef>.</p></note> He is “<i>head over all things</i> to the church. “<note n="298" id="iv.ii-p75.2"><p class="normal" id="iv.ii-p76">
<scripRef id="iv.ii-p76.1" passage="Eph. i. 22" parsed="|Eph|1|22|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Eph.1.22">Eph. i. 22</scripRef>.</p></note> He is “able to <i>subdue all things</i> unto himself.”<note n="299" id="iv.ii-p76.2"><p class="normal" id="iv.ii-p77">
<scripRef id="iv.ii-p77.1" passage="Phil. iii. 21" parsed="|Phil|3|21|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Phil.3.21">Phil. iii. 21</scripRef>.</p></note> He is “the first and the last, which is, and which was, 
and which is to come, <i>the Almighty</i>.”<note n="300" id="iv.ii-p77.2"><p class="normal" id="iv.ii-p78"><scripRef id="iv.ii-p78.1" passage="Rev. i. 8" parsed="|Rev|1|8|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Rev.1.8">Rev. i. 8</scripRef>.</p></note> “He upholds
<i>all things</i>, by the word of his power.”<note n="301" id="iv.ii-p78.2"><p class="normal" id="iv.ii-p79"><scripRef id="iv.ii-p79.1" passage="Heb. i. 3" parsed="|Heb|1|3|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Heb.1.3">Heb. i. 3</scripRef>.</p></note> 
His creating and upholding <i>all things</i>, and other works which are ascribed 
to him, are, without controversy, the work of Omnipotence. But these will be more 
particularly considered under another head.</p>
<pb n="335" id="iv.ii-Page_335" />
<p class="normal" id="iv.ii-p80">That he is <i>Omnipresent</i>, he himself declared, “Where two 
or three are gathered together in my name, <i>there am I in the midst of them</i>.” 
“And lo, <i>I am with you alway, even unto the end of the world</i>.”<note n="302" id="iv.ii-p80.1"><p class="normal" id="iv.ii-p81"><scripRef id="iv.ii-p81.1" passage="Matt. xviii. 20" parsed="|Matt|18|20|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Matt.18.20">Matt. 
xviii. 20</scripRef>. <scripRef passage="Mat 28:20" id="iv.ii-p81.2" parsed="|Matt|28|20|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Matt.28.20">xxviii. 20</scripRef>.</p></note> 
“And no man hath ascended up to heaven, but he that came down from heaven, even 
the Son of man <i>which is in heaven</i>.”<note n="303" id="iv.ii-p81.3"><p class="normal" id="iv.ii-p82"><scripRef id="iv.ii-p82.1" passage="John iii. 13" parsed="|John|3|13|0|0" osisRef="Bible:John.3.13">John iii. 13</scripRef>.</p></note> Surely these 
things cannot be said with truth of any one but Him, whose presence fills heaven 
and earth. <i>Omniscience</i> is also one of his attributes. This Peter ascribes 
to him, without reserve, and with the greatest confidence. “And Peter said unto 
him, Lord, <i>thou knowest all things</i>.”<note n="304" id="iv.ii-p82.2"><p class="normal" id="iv.ii-p83"><scripRef id="iv.ii-p83.1" passage="John xxi. 17" parsed="|John|21|17|0|0" osisRef="Bible:John.21.17">John xxi. 17</scripRef>.</p></note> It is asserted, 
agreeable to this, that “He <i>knew all men</i>, and knew <i>what was in man</i>.”<note n="305" id="iv.ii-p83.2"><p class="normal" id="iv.ii-p84">
<scripRef id="iv.ii-p84.1" passage="John ii. 24" parsed="|John|2|24|0|0" osisRef="Bible:John.2.24">John ii. 24</scripRef>, <scripRef passage="John 2:25" id="iv.ii-p84.2" parsed="|John|2|25|0|0" osisRef="Bible:John.2.25">25</scripRef>.</p></note> And it is often said that he knew the secret thoughts of 
men. And he says, “And all the churches shall know that I am he which searcheth 
the reins and hearts, and will give unto every one of you according to his works.”<note n="306" id="iv.ii-p84.3"><p class="normal" id="iv.ii-p85">
<scripRef id="iv.ii-p85.1" passage="Rev. ii. 23" parsed="|Rev|2|23|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Rev.2.23">Rev. ii. 23</scripRef>.</p></note> This is elsewhere spoken of as the attribute and prerogative 
of the omniscient God alone. Solomon, speaking to <span class="sc" id="iv.ii-p85.2">Jehovah</span>, 
says, “Thou <i>only knowest the hearts of the children of men</i>.”<note n="307" id="iv.ii-p85.3"><p class="normal" id="iv.ii-p86"><scripRef id="iv.ii-p86.1" passage="2 Chron. ix. 30" parsed="|2Chr|9|30|0|0" osisRef="Bible:2Chr.9.30">2 Chron. 
ix. 30</scripRef>.</p></note> “The righteous God <i>trieth the hearts and reins</i>.”<note n="308" id="iv.ii-p86.2"><p class="normal" id="iv.ii-p87"><scripRef id="iv.ii-p87.1" passage="Psalm vii. 9" parsed="|Ps|7|9|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Ps.7.9">Psalm 
vii. 9</scripRef>.</p></note> “I, <i>the Lord, search the heart, I try the reins</i>, even to give 
every man according to his ways.”<note n="309" id="iv.ii-p87.2"><p class="normal" id="iv.ii-p88"><scripRef id="iv.ii-p88.1" passage="Jer. xvii. 10" parsed="|Jer|17|10|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Jer.17.10">Jer. xvii. 10</scripRef>.</p></note> If Jesus Christ were 
not the only true God, it is impossible he should take to himself this attribute, 
prerogative and work, which Jehovah, the God of Israel, claims to himself exclusively; 
and which is infinitely too much to be ascribed to any mere creature. Jesus Christ 
is declared to be <i>incomprehensible</i>, which is an attribute peculiar to Deity. 
He says of himself, “All things are delivered unto me of my Father; and <i>no man</i> 
(no one, it is in the original) <i>knoweth the Son but the Father</i>.”<note n="310" id="iv.ii-p88.2"><p class="normal" id="iv.ii-p89"><scripRef id="iv.ii-p89.1" passage="Matt. xi. 27" parsed="|Matt|11|27|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Matt.11.27">Matt. 
xi. 27</scripRef>.</p></note> And it is said of him, “He had a name written that <i>no man</i> 
(no one) <i>knew but</i> he himself.”<note n="311" id="iv.ii-p89.2"><p class="normal" id="iv.ii-p90"><scripRef id="iv.ii-p90.1" passage="Rev. xix. 12" parsed="|Rev|19|12|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Rev.19.12">Rev. xix. 12</scripRef>.</p></note> <i>Equality</i> 
with God is ascribed unto him. St. Paul, speaking of his person, says, “Who being 
in the form of God, thought it not robbery <i>to be equal with God</i>.”<note n="312" id="iv.ii-p90.2"><p class="normal" id="iv.ii-p91"><scripRef id="iv.ii-p91.1" passage="Phil. ii. 6" parsed="|Phil|2|6|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Phil.2.6">Phil. 
ii. 6</scripRef>.</p></note> Jesus said to the Jews, “I and my Father are <i>one</i>.”<note n="313" id="iv.ii-p91.2"><p class="normal" id="iv.ii-p92"><scripRef id="iv.ii-p92.1" passage="John x. 30" parsed="|John|10|30|0|0" osisRef="Bible:John.10.30">John 
x. 30</scripRef>.</p></note> The Jews understood him as <pb n="336" id="iv.ii-Page_336" />hereby claiming to be God, 
and charged him with making himself God.<note n="314" id="iv.ii-p92.2"><p class="normal" id="iv.ii-p93"><scripRef id="iv.ii-p93.1" passage="John x. 33" parsed="|John|10|33|0|0" osisRef="Bible:John.10.33">John x. 33</scripRef>.</p></note> Nor does Christ, 
in his answer to them, renounce this claim. Jesus said, “My Father worketh hitherto, 
and I work.”<note n="315" id="iv.ii-p93.2"><p class="normal" id="iv.ii-p94"><scripRef id="iv.ii-p94.1" passage="John v. 17" parsed="|John|5|17|0|0" osisRef="Bible:John.5.17">John v. 17</scripRef>.</p></note> Upon this the Jews charged him with making 
himself <i>equal with God</i>. Nor does he deny this charge, or say that it is unjust: 
but goes on to say, in a yet stronger manner, “<i>What things soever</i> the 
Father doeth, those also doth the Son likewise. For as the Father raiseth up the 
death, and quickeneth them; even so the Son quickeneth whom he will. For the Father 
hath committed all judgment unto the Son; that all men should honour the Son, even 
as they honour the Father.” Surely this is making himself equal with God. He moreover 
says, “All things that the Father hath, are mine.”<note n="316" id="iv.ii-p94.2"><p class="normal" id="iv.ii-p95"><scripRef id="iv.ii-p95.1" passage="John xvi. 15" parsed="|John|16|15|0|0" osisRef="Bible:John.16.15">John xvi. 15</scripRef>.</p></note> Thus 
he claims to be equal with the Father, the owner and possessor of <i>all things</i>. 
This is consistent with his saying, “The Father is greater than I,” as he was man 
as well as God, and agreeable to the economy of redemption, in the human nature, 
was become a servant, to obey and suffer, in order to effect the redemption of man. 
In this capacity and work he was sent, and to be justified and exalted by the Father. 
In this view his words have a plain meaning, consistent with his claim of equality 
with the Father, as God. “If ye had loved me, ye would rejoice, because I said, 
I go unto the Father; for my Father is greater than I.”<note n="317" id="iv.ii-p95.2"><p class="normal" id="iv.ii-p96"><scripRef id="iv.ii-p96.1" passage="John xiv. 28" parsed="|John|14|28|0|0" osisRef="Bible:John.14.28">John xiv. 28</scripRef>.</p></note></p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.ii-p97">4. The divinity of Jesus Christ is asserted by ascribing to him 
those divine works which God alone can do.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.ii-p98">He puts himself upon an equality with the Father in this respect, 
and says, that he does whatsoever the Father doth. “My Father worketh hitherto,
<i>and I work</i>. What things soever he doth, those also doth the Son likewise.”<note n="318" id="iv.ii-p98.1"><p class="normal" id="iv.ii-p99">
<scripRef id="iv.ii-p99.1" passage="John v. 17" parsed="|John|5|17|0|0" osisRef="Bible:John.5.17">John v. 17</scripRef>, <scripRef passage="John 5:19" id="iv.ii-p99.2" parsed="|John|5|19|0|0" osisRef="Bible:John.5.19">19</scripRef>.</p></note> The works of creation and providence are ascribed to him. 
“All things were made by him, and without him was not any thing made that was made.”<note n="319" id="iv.ii-p99.3"><p class="normal" id="iv.ii-p100">
<scripRef id="iv.ii-p100.1" passage="John i. 3" parsed="|John|1|3|0|0" osisRef="Bible:John.1.3">John i. 3</scripRef>.</p></note> “For by him were all things created that are in heaven, and that 
are in earth, visible and invisible, whether they be thrones, or dominions, or principalities, 
or powers; all things were created by him, and for him.”<note n="320" id="iv.ii-p100.2"><p class="normal" id="iv.ii-p101"><scripRef id="iv.ii-p101.1" passage="Col. i. 16" parsed="|Col|1|16|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Col.1.16">Col. i. 16</scripRef>.</p></note> 
God <pb n="337" id="iv.ii-Page_337" />hath made all things for himself: All things were made by Jesus 
Christ, and for him; Therefore he is God. “And he is before all things, and <i>by 
him all things consist</i>.”<note n="321" id="iv.ii-p101.2"><p class="normal" id="iv.ii-p102"><scripRef id="iv.ii-p102.1" passage="Col. i. 17" parsed="|Col|1|17|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Col.1.17">Col. i. 17</scripRef>.</p></note> “Who being the brightness 
of his glory, and the express image of his person, and <i>upholding all things by 
the word of his power</i>, when he had by himself purged our sins, sat down on the 
right hand of the Majesty on high.”<note n="322" id="iv.ii-p102.2"><p class="normal" id="iv.ii-p103"><scripRef id="iv.ii-p103.1" passage="Heb. i. 3" parsed="|Heb|1|3|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Heb.1.3">Heb. i. 3</scripRef>.</p></note>And he is addressed 
in the following words, “Thou, Lord, in the beginning, hast laid the foundation 
of the earth; and the heavens are the works of thine hands.”<note n="323" id="iv.ii-p103.2"><p class="normal" id="iv.ii-p104"><scripRef id="iv.ii-p104.1" passage="Psa. cii. 25" parsed="|Ps|102|25|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Ps.102.25">Psa. cii. 25</scripRef>. <scripRef passage="Heb 1:10" id="iv.ii-p104.2" parsed="|Heb|1|10|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Heb.1.10">
Heb. i. 10</scripRef>.</p></note> Bat these are the works of God, of Jehovah, and peculiar 
to him. “In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth. By the word 
of the Lord were the heavens made; and all the host of them by the breath of his 
mouth.”<note n="324" id="iv.ii-p104.3"><p class="normal" id="iv.ii-p105"><scripRef id="iv.ii-p105.1" passage="Gen. i. 1" parsed="|Gen|1|1|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Gen.1.1">Gen. i. 1</scripRef>. <scripRef passage="Psa 33:6" id="iv.ii-p105.2" parsed="|Ps|33|6|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Ps.33.6">Psa. xxxiii. 6</scripRef>.</p></note></p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.ii-p106">Jesus Christ raiseth men from the dead, which is a work of omnipotence 
as great as that of creation. When he was on earth he raised man from the dead, 
by his own powerful word. And he claims power and authority to raise all the dead 
of mankind, at the last day. He hath said, “The hour is coming, in the which all 
that are in the graves shall hear the voice of the Son of God, and shall come forth, 
they that have done good, unto the resurrection of life; and they that have done 
evil, unto the resurrection of damnation. And this is the will of him that sent 
me, that every one which seeth the Son, and believeth on him, may have everlasting 
life: <i>and I will raise him up at the last day. I am the resurrection and the 
life</i>.”<note n="325" id="iv.ii-p106.1"><p class="normal" id="iv.ii-p107"><scripRef id="iv.ii-p107.1" passage="John v. 29" parsed="|John|5|29|0|0" osisRef="Bible:John.5.29">John v. 29</scripRef>, <scripRef passage="John 5:26" id="iv.ii-p107.2" parsed="|John|5|26|0|0" osisRef="Bible:John.5.26">26</scripRef>. <scripRef passage="John 6:40" id="iv.ii-p107.3" parsed="|John|6|40|0|0" osisRef="Bible:John.6.40">vi. 40</scripRef>. <scripRef passage="John 11:25" id="iv.ii-p107.4" parsed="|John|11|25|0|0" osisRef="Bible:John.11.25">
xi. 25</scripRef>.</p></note></p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.ii-p108">Jesus Christ will judge the world, angels, devils, and all mankind. 
This is often asserted in the scripture. All judgment is committed unto him. A work 
infinitely too great for a mere creature to perform; and therefore infinitely too 
great for him, and too high and honourable, were he not the most high God, possessed 
of infinite power, knowledge, wisdom and rectitude.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.ii-p109">But one thing more will be added under this head. Jesus Christ 
is <i>Governor of the world</i>. He has all things in his hand; upholds all things 
by the word of his power; is head over all things to the church, having <pb n="338" id="iv.ii-Page_338" />
all power in heaven and on earth. He executeth a particular providence; his care 
and power orders and effects every event, and extends to every creature and thing 
in the created universe, whether great or small. He alone, therefore, is able to 
take the book of the divine decrees, and open the seals thereof, by governing the 
world, and bringing to pass all things agreeable to the eternal purpose. None can 
do this but he who has omnipotence, infinite knowledge, wisdom and goodness.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.ii-p110">5. It is certain that Jesus Christ is the supreme God, in that 
he is the object of the divine worship, which would be idolatry, if offered to any 
being but the only true God.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.ii-p111">Nothing can be more evident and certain than that God is the only 
proper object of religious worship. Jesus Christ is, in the holy scriptures, asserted 
to be the object of such worship; therefore he is God.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.ii-p112">All the angels of heaven are commanded to worship him. “When he 
bringeth the first begotten into the world, he saith. And <i>let all the angels 
of God worship him</i>.”<note n="326" id="iv.ii-p112.1"><p class="normal" id="iv.ii-p113"><scripRef id="iv.ii-p113.1" passage="Heb. i. 6" parsed="|Heb|1|6|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Heb.1.6">Heb. i. 6</scripRef>.</p></note> John saw and heard him worshipped 
in heaven, and represented as the object of prayer and praise. “And when he had 
taken the book, the four beasts, and the four and twenty elders, fell down before 
the Lamb, having every one of them harps, and golden vials full of odours, <i>which 
are the prayers of saints</i>. And they sung a new song, saying, Thou art worthy 
to take the book, and open the seals thereof; for thou wast slain, and hast redeemed 
us to God, by thy blood. And I beheld, and I heard the voice of many angels round 
about the throne, and the beasts and the elders; and the number of them was ten 
thousand times ten thousand, and thousands of thousands: saying, with a loud voice, 
Worthy is the Lamb that was slain, to receive power, and riches, and wisdom, and 
strength, and honour, and glory, and blessing. And every creature heard I saying. 
Blessing, and honour, and glory, and power, be unto him that sitteth upon the throne, 
and unto the Lamb, forever and ever. And the Tour beasts said» Amen. And the four 
and twenty elders fell down and worshipped him that liveth forever and ever;” even 
<pb n="339" id="iv.ii-Page_339" />Jesus Christ, who was dead, and is alive, and behold, he liveth forever 
and ever.<note n="327" id="iv.ii-p113.2"><p class="normal" id="iv.ii-p114"><scripRef id="iv.ii-p114.1" passage="Rev. i. 18" parsed="|Rev|1|18|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Rev.1.18">Rev. i. 18</scripRef>. <scripRef passage="Rev 5:8,9,11,12,13,14" id="iv.ii-p114.2" parsed="|Rev|5|8|5|9;|Rev|5|11|0|0;|Rev|5|12|0|0;|Rev|5|13|0|0;|Rev|5|14|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Rev.5.8-Rev.5.9 Bible:Rev.5.11 Bible:Rev.5.12 Bible:Rev.5.13 Bible:Rev.5.14">
v. 8, 9, 11, 12, 13, 14</scripRef>.</p></note> Thus all in heaven and on earth “honour 
the Lamb, the Son, <i>even</i> as they honour the Father.”<note n="328" id="iv.ii-p114.3"><p class="normal" id="iv.ii-p115"><scripRef id="iv.ii-p115.1" passage="John v. 23" parsed="|John|5|23|0|0" osisRef="Bible:John.5.23">John v. 23</scripRef>.</p></note></p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.ii-p116">Agreeable to this, St. Paul says of Jesus Christ, “God hath highly 
exalted him, and given him a name <i>which is above every name</i>; that <i>at the 
name of Jesus, every knee should bow</i>, of things in heaven and things in earth, 
and under the earth; (or angels, and men, both the living and the dead) and that 
every tongue should confess that Jesus Christ is Lord, to the glory of God the Father.”<note n="329" id="iv.ii-p116.1"><p class="normal" id="iv.ii-p117">
<scripRef id="iv.ii-p117.1" passage="Phil. ii. 9" parsed="|Phil|2|9|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Phil.2.9">Phil. ii. 9</scripRef>, <scripRef passage="Phil 2:10" id="iv.ii-p117.2" parsed="|Phil|2|10|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Phil.2.10">10</scripRef>, <scripRef passage="Phil 2:11" id="iv.ii-p117.3" parsed="|Phil|2|11|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Phil.2.11">11</scripRef>.</p></note></p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.ii-p118">These words express the involuntary subjection of his enemies, 
and the voluntary submission, adoration, and worship of his friends, which is given 
only to God. And that such subjection, submission and worship, is here intended, 
which is due to God alone; and that Jesus Christ is this God, is evident both from 
this same apostle’s quotation of these words in another place, and from the passage 
in the prophet Isaiah, from, whence they are taken. “For we shall all stand before 
the judgment seat of Christ. For it is written, As I live, saith the Lord, every 
knee shall bow to me, and every tongue shall confess to God.”<note n="330" id="iv.ii-p118.1"><p class="normal" id="iv.ii-p119"><scripRef id="iv.ii-p119.1" passage="Rom. xiv. 10" parsed="|Rom|14|10|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Rom.14.10">Rom. xiv. 10</scripRef>, 
<scripRef passage="Rom 14:11" id="iv.ii-p119.2" parsed="|Rom|14|11|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Rom.14.11">11</scripRef>.</p></note> This homage is here said to be paid to Jesus Christ, as Judge of the 
world, and as God. And this bowing the knee and confession, is claimed by
<span class="sc" id="iv.ii-p119.3">Jehovah</span>, the God of Israel, and he says it shall be given 
to him, as the only true God, in the passage quoted from Isaiah, “I am God, and 
there is none else. I have sworn by myself, the word is gone out of my mouth in 
righteousness, and shall not return, <i>that unto </i><span class="sc" id="iv.ii-p119.4">me </span>
<i>every knee shall bow, and every tongue shall swear</i>.”<note n="331" id="iv.ii-p119.5"><p class="normal" id="iv.ii-p120"><scripRef id="iv.ii-p120.1" passage="Isaiah xlv. 22" parsed="|Isa|45|22|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Isa.45.22">Isaiah xlv. 22</scripRef>, 
<scripRef passage="Isaiah 45:23" id="iv.ii-p120.2" parsed="|Isa|45|23|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Isa.45.23">23</scripRef>.</p></note></p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.ii-p121">Stephen, the first martyr, prayed to Jesus Christ, and committed 
his spirit, himself, to him, when he was expiring under the hand of his persecutors. 
And they stoned Stephen, calling upon God, and saying. <i>Lord Jesus, receive my 
spirit</i>.<note n="332" id="iv.ii-p121.1"><p class="normal" id="iv.ii-p122"><scripRef id="iv.ii-p122.1" passage="Acts vii. 59" parsed="|Acts|7|59|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Acts.7.59">Acts vii. 59</scripRef>.</p></note> The word God is not in the original, and 
the words might be with propriety rendered, <pb n="340" id="iv.ii-Page_340" /><i>calling upon Jesus 
Christ, saying, Lord Jesus, &amp;c</i>. Such a solemn prayer to Jesus Christ, putting 
his whole trust in him, and committing his soul to him, with his last breath, is 
an act of worship, which would be gross idolatry, if offered to any but God.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.ii-p123">And as Stephen worshipped Jesus Christ, and called upon his name, 
making his last prayer to him when he was leaving the world, he was not singular 
and alone in this; but thus calling on the name of Christ was practised by all christians, 
and therefore mentioned as expressive of their character, and an essential branch 
of it, and by which they are denominated, and distinguished from others. St. Paul 
thus addresses them: “Unto the church of God, which is at Corinth, to them that 
are sanctified in Christ Jesus, called to be saints, with all that in every place
<i>call upon the name of Jesus Christ, our Lord, both theirs and ours</i>.”<note n="333" id="iv.ii-p123.1"><p class="normal" id="iv.ii-p124">
<scripRef id="iv.ii-p124.1" passage="1 Cor. i. 2" parsed="|1Cor|1|2|0|0" osisRef="Bible:1Cor.1.2">1 Cor. i. 2</scripRef>.</p></note> 
Ananias, speaking to the Lord Jesus Christ, says, “And here he (Saul) hath authority 
from the chief priests to bind all that call on thy name.”<note n="334" id="iv.ii-p124.2"><p class="normal" id="iv.ii-p125"><scripRef id="iv.ii-p125.1" passage="Acts ix. 14" parsed="|Acts|9|14|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Acts.9.14">Acts ix. 14</scripRef>.</p></note> 
That is, all christians. And of Saul it is further said, “And straightway he preached 
Christ in the synagogues, that he is the Son of God. But all that heard him were 
amazed, and said, Is not this he that destroyed them <i>which called on this name</i> 
in Jerusalem, and came hither for that intent, that he might bring them bound unto 
the chief priests.”<note n="335" id="iv.ii-p125.2"><p class="normal" id="iv.ii-p126"><scripRef passage="Acts 9:20,21" id="iv.ii-p126.1" parsed="|Acts|9|20|9|21" osisRef="Bible:Acts.9.20-Acts.9.21">Verse 20, 21</scripRef>.</p></note></p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.ii-p127">And when he was on earth he was worshipped—By the wise men from 
the east—By a ruler of the synagogue—By a woman of Canaan—By a leper—By a man born 
blind, whom he had restored to sight—By all who were in the ship with him—By the 
women, when they saw him, after his resurrection—By the multitude of his disciples, 
when he appeared to them in Galilee; and by his disciples who saw him ascend from 
Mount Olivet into heaven. Yet in none of these instances did he forbid this worship 
to be paid to him, or shew the least disapprobation of it; but the history of it 
leads us to suppose that such worship was proper; and that he accepted it with approbation, 
and was pleased with it: Whereas, when Cornelius the centurion, <pb n="341" id="iv.ii-Page_341" />offered 
to worship Peter, he forbid and reproved him, saying, “Stand up, I myself also am 
a man.”<note n="336" id="iv.ii-p127.1"><p class="normal" id="iv.ii-p128"><scripRef id="iv.ii-p128.1" passage="Acts x. 26" parsed="|Acts|10|26|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Acts.10.26">Acts x. 26</scripRef>.</p></note> And when St. John offered to worship the Angel 
who spake to him, he received a rebuke from him. He said unto him, “See thou do 
it not; for I am thy fellow servant. Worship God.”<note n="337" id="iv.ii-p128.2"><p class="normal" id="iv.ii-p129"><scripRef id="iv.ii-p129.1" passage="Rev. xix. 10" parsed="|Rev|19|10|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Rev.19.10">Rev. xix. 10</scripRef>. <scripRef passage="Rev 22:9" id="iv.ii-p129.2" parsed="|Rev|22|9|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Rev.22.9">
xxii. 9</scripRef>.</p></note> Plainly declaring that God only is the proper object 
of such worship; which worship was paid to Jesus Christ, with his approbation, as 
has been observed; which he must have rejected, and rebuked those who offered it, 
as Peter and the Angel did, had he not been a divine person, that is, God. He himself 
rebuked the devil when he proposed to Christ to worship him; not because he was 
an evil being; but because he was not God, and such worship was to be given to God 
only. “Then saith Jesus unto him, Get thee hence, Satan; for it is written, thou 
shalt worship the Lord thy God, and him only shalt thou serve.”<note n="338" id="iv.ii-p129.3"><p class="normal" id="iv.ii-p130"><scripRef id="iv.ii-p130.1" passage="Matt. iv. 10" parsed="|Matt|4|10|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Matt.4.10">Matt. iv. 
10</scripRef>.</p></note> The word in the original translated <i>serve</i>, is found in above twenty 
places in the New Testament, and always means religious service, implying devotion 
and religious worship, and is in a number of places translated <i>to worship</i>.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.ii-p131">The disciples of Christ and the christian church, by thus worshipping 
him as their Lord, and their God, obeyed the prophetic direction and command given 
in the <scripRef passage="Ps 45:11" id="iv.ii-p131.1" parsed="|Ps|45|11|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Ps.45.11">45th psalm</scripRef>. “So shall the king greatly 
desire thy beauty; for he is thy Lord, <i>and worship thou him</i>.”</p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.ii-p132"><span class="sc" id="iv.ii-p132.1">Jehovah</span> had abundantly expressed his peculiar 
displeasure with idolatry, and done much to guard his people, and warn them against 
it, and all approaches to it: and did often strictly forbid their worshipping any 
creature, idols, or any god besides himself. And he had often punished them for 
this sin, as peculiarly provoking to him. He had said, “Thou shalt have no other 
gods before me: thou shalt not bow down thyself to them, nor serve them; for I the 
Lord thy God am a jealous God. Thou shalt worship no other god; for I the Lord, 
whose name is Jealous, am a jealous God. I am the Lord, that is my name, and my 
glory I will not give unto another, neither my praise to graven images.” If Jesus 
Christ were not God, even this same <pb n="342" id="iv.ii-Page_342" />God, who has said these things, 
what a contradiction to these declarations and commands, and how inconsistent is 
it with them to set him so high, as worthy of equal honour with the Father; to call 
him God, and give him all the power in heaven and earth, and make him head over
<i>all things</i> to the church; to represent him as praised, adored, and worshipped, 
by all the inhabitants in heaven; and to command all the angels in heaven, and the 
church in earth, to worship him! Were he not the true God, this would be the greatest 
imaginable, and even an irresistible temptation and encouragement to the most gross 
idolatry; to worship and trust in him who is not God, but a mere creature. We cannot 
reconcile the Old Testament with the New, or the New Testament with itself, unless 
we believe and grant, that Jesus Christ is the true God; for in both, men are repeatedly 
forbidden to worship, or pay religious homage to any but the only true God: And 
yet in both, they are commanded to worship Jesus Christ, the Son of God, the King 
of Israel. And the latter teaches us that he who of old was worshipped by the Seraphim 
under the name and character of <span class="sc" id="iv.ii-p132.2">Jehovah</span>, the Lord of hosts, 
was Jesus Christ.<note n="339" id="iv.ii-p132.3"><p class="normal" id="iv.ii-p133"><scripRef id="iv.ii-p133.1" passage="Isaiah vi. 1" parsed="|Isa|6|1|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Isa.6.1">Isaiah vi. 1</scripRef>, <scripRef passage="Isaiah 6:2" id="iv.ii-p133.2" parsed="|Isa|6|2|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Isa.6.2">2</scripRef>. <scripRef passage="John 13:37-41" id="iv.ii-p133.3" parsed="|John|13|37|13|41" osisRef="Bible:John.13.37-John.13.41">John 
xii. 37-41</scripRef>.</p></note> But if Jesus Christ be the true Son of God; God with 
us; God manifest in the flesh, as he is expressly declared to be, all the Bible 
can be reconciled with itself, and appears perfectly consistent, on this head: While 
we there behold him who was in the form of God, and thought it not robbery to be 
equal with God; who appeared and acted from the beginning of the world, and under 
the Old Testament dispensation, in the form of God, who took to himself the name
<span class="sc" id="iv.ii-p133.4">Jehovah</span>, and the attributes and character of the most high 
God, and claimed the worship and honours which belong to God alone: While we behold
<span class="sc" id="iv.ii-p133.5">him</span> laying aside his former appearance and glory, and making 
himself of no reputation; taking upon himself the form of a servant, instead of 
the form of God, in which he appeared before; being made in the likeness of man: 
In this view, we shall see the whole scripture to harmonize on this point, and be 
constrained <pb n="343" id="iv.ii-Page_343" />to say with Thomas, “My Lord, and my God!” and join to 
honour him, even as the Father is honoured; ascribing, with the heavenly hosts, 
praise, blessing, wisdom, power, dominion and glory, unto him that sitteth upon 
the throne, and unto the <span class="sc" id="iv.ii-p133.6">Lamb</span>, forever and ever.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.ii-p134">And, indeed, if <i>he</i> be not the true God, and to be worshipped 
as God, who has created all things that ever were created; and upholds them all 
continually by his powerful word; who has all the power in the universe, and sustains 
and governs all creatures and things, being head over all things to the church; 
it will be impossible to find any proper object of worship, or any God to be trusted 
and adored.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.ii-p135">It may be further added, that the religious rite of baptism, instituted 
by Christ, is a solemn and important act of devotion and worship, in which the name 
of God is invoked, and the person baptized is dedicated to him with awful solemnity. 
This religious act of worship is commanded to be done in the name of Christ, in 
which he joined with the Father and the Holy Ghost. “Go teach all nations, said 
Christ to his disciples, baptizing them in the name of the Father, and of the Son, 
and of the Holy Ghost.”<note n="340" id="iv.ii-p135.1"><p class="normal" id="iv.ii-p136"><scripRef id="iv.ii-p136.1" passage="Matt. xxviii. 19" parsed="|Matt|28|19|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Matt.28.19">Matt. xxviii. 19</scripRef>.</p></note> This, properly considered, 
will appear a demonstration of the divinity of the Son of God, and that he is equally 
God with the Father; and cannot be accounted for on any other supposition. If Jesus 
Christ were not God, what a profanation of the sacred name would this be, and what 
a gross act of idolatry, to join his name with that of the only true God, as equal 
with him in such a solemn act of covenanting, and religious worship!</p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.ii-p137">The priests in Israel, Aaron and his sons, were appointed and 
directed to <i>bless</i>, in the name of the Lord, and to say, “The Lord bless thee, 
and keep thee: The Lord make his face to shine upon thee, and be gracious unto thee. 
The Lord lift up his countenance upon thee, and give thee peace.” This was an act 
of solemn, religious worship, invoking the name of <span class="sc" id="iv.ii-p137.1">Jehovah</span>, 
and calling on him.<note n="341" id="iv.ii-p137.2"><p class="normal" id="iv.ii-p138"><scripRef id="iv.ii-p138.1" passage="Num. vi. 23" parsed="|Num|6|23|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Num.6.23">Num. vi. 23</scripRef>, <scripRef passage="Num 6:24" id="iv.ii-p138.2" parsed="|Num|6|24|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Num.6.24">24</scripRef>, <scripRef passage="Num 6:25" id="iv.ii-p138.3" parsed="|Num|6|25|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Num.6.25">25</scripRef>, <scripRef passage="Num 6:26" id="iv.ii-p138.4" parsed="|Num|6|26|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Num.6.26">26</scripRef>. <scripRef passage="1Chr 23:13" id="iv.ii-p138.5" parsed="|1Chr|23|13|0|0" osisRef="Bible:1Chr.23.13">
1 Chron. xxiii. 13</scripRef>.</p></note> St. Paul <i>blesses</i> christians, in the 
name of the same Lord, doubtless, even <pb n="344" id="iv.ii-Page_344" />in the name into which they 
were baptized, saying, “The grace of our Lord Jesus Christ, and the love of God, 
and the communion of the Holy Ghost, be with you all, Amen.”<note n="342" id="iv.ii-p138.6"><p class="normal" id="iv.ii-p139"><scripRef id="iv.ii-p139.1" passage="2 Cor. xiii. 14" parsed="|2Cor|13|14|0|0" osisRef="Bible:2Cor.13.14">2 Cor. xiii. 
14</scripRef>.</p></note> This is an act of devotion and worship, in which God is called upon to 
bless; or he asks this blessing from God. If Jesus Christ were not God, thus to 
bless in his name, and join him with the true God in this invocation, and act of 
worship, would be real idolatry. And it is remarkable that as the name
<span class="sc" id="iv.ii-p139.2">Jehovah</span>, or Lord, is mentioned distinctly three times, in 
the blessing which Aaron and his sons were ordered to pronounce, denoting, as is 
reasonably supposed, the <i>three</i>, included in that name; so the apostle, blessing 
in the same name, mentions <i>three</i>, as included in this name, each of which 
is elsewhere expressly called God, and Lord. And it is worthy of observation here, 
that as the baptism which Christ ordered to be administered in the name of the Father, 
Son, and Holy Ghost, is afterwards said to be administered in the name of the Lord, 
and in the name of Jesus Christ because one of these supposes and comprehends all; 
so this apostle, who blessed in the name of these same <i>three</i>, does more commonly 
bless in the name of Jesus Christ. “The grace of our Lord Jesus Christ, be with 
you;” because he is God, and the whole Trinity is implied in his name: And this 
is to bless in the name of the adorable <i>three</i>, as really as when they are 
distinctly mentioned.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.ii-p140">Much more may be produced from the holy scriptures to prove and 
confirm this truth, that Jesus Christ is God; but surely what his been now collected 
from the sacred oracles on this head, is sufficient to establish this important 
doctrine in the mind of every honest, unprejudiced person, who is willing properly 
to attend to it, and to know the truth.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.ii-p141">There have been, and now are, indeed, many professing christians, 
who do not believe; but deny and oppose this doctrine of the divinity of Jesus Christ. 
These appear to be led to renounce this doctrine, principally for two reasons.
<i>First</i>, because they are disposed to reject every doctrine in Christianity, 
which they cannot <pb n="345" id="iv.ii-Page_345" />comprehend, and fully understand, with their boasted 
reason. They therefore deny the doctrine of the Trinity, as well as this of the 
divinity of Christ, and many other doctrines, which to them are incomprehensible, 
and which they therefore pronounce unreasonable. And would they be consistent, they 
must renounce Christianity itself, and even the belief of the being of a God, and 
of almost every thing else; for the existence of God is as incomprehensible as the 
divinity of Christ: And it is above our reason or conception, and contrary to reason 
as some would improve it, that any being should exist without any cause out of himself; 
and without beginning to exist; and unchangeable, &amp;c. If the being of a God be admitted, 
which must be admitted, unless we renounce all reason, we must admit innumerable 
mysteries, which our minds cannot fathom and comprehend.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.ii-p142">And what object is there in universal nature, which can be fully 
comprehended by us? And what truth is there which respects God or the creature, 
which can be perfectly understood by us, and which is not attended with seeming 
contradictions; at least, in the view of some?</p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.ii-p143"><i>Secondly</i>, Another reason of their rejecting the doctrine 
of the divinity of Christ, is, their not seeing any need of his being God, in order 
to be the Saviour of men. They entertain such notions of God, the divine law and 
government, of the nature and demerit of sin, the state of fallen man, &amp;c. that 
they cannot see any need of atonement for sin, which a creature cannot make, or 
of any thing to be done by the Redeemer of man, which a mere creature cannot do. 
Therefore they are resolved not to admit a doctrine which in their view is so incomprehensible 
and absurd, and at the same time so perfectly useless. They therefore think they 
find many things in divine revelation inconsistent with this doctrine; and have 
attempted to explain away those passages of scripture adduced to support it, and 
to put such a sense upon them as to make them assert no such thing. Their objections, 
and manner of explaining the scriptures, so as to make them consistent with their 
believing Jesus Christ to be a mere creature, will not be particularly considered 
here; as this has been done by many able divines. <pb n="346" id="iv.ii-Page_346" />What has been 
now produced from the scriptures, to prove that Jesus Christ is the true God, it 
is presumed, is sufficient to satisfy every humble, modest inquirer after the truth, 
that this doctrine is clearly revealed in the Bible; and in such a manner, that 
the evidence of it is incontestible, and must be admitted, if we admit the scriptures 
to be the standard of truth. And this evidence will rise higher, if possible, as 
we proceed, and when we come to consider the importance and necessity of this doctrine; 
and that none but a divine person could be the Redeemer of man, consistent with 
other doctrines and truths of divine revelation; and do and suffer what was necessary 
to be done and suffered, in order to redeem sinners: That a person who is not God, 
would be infinitely unequal to this work.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.ii-p144">But there is another truth equally important, and plainly revealed, 
with that which we have been considering, concerning this wonderful person.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.ii-p145">II. The Redeemer of sinners is truly and really man. This person 
is both God and man. The <span class="sc" id="iv.ii-p145.1">Word</span>, who was God, and created 
all things that are made, became, and was made flesh, and dwelt among men. He was 
made in the likeness of men, and was found in fashion as a man, that is, was really 
man, “the son of man.” He is therefore denominated <i>man, that man</i>, the man 
Christ Jesus, &amp;c. This necessarily implies that he had a real body and soul; for 
these are essential to human nature; so that none can be a real man, who has not 
both these. The history of his conception, birth, life, death and resurrection, 
states this truth in a clear and unequivocal light. Therefore there is need of nothing 
farther to be said, to prove that Jesus Christ is really man. But it seems needful 
to observe and attend to the following things concerning this wonderful, incomprehensible 
person, God man, and the union of these two natures, in this <i>one person</i>.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.ii-p146">1. The human nature of Jesus Christ is not a distinct person, 
separate from the divine nature, or his Godhead. The human nature exists, and began 
to exist, in union with the sacred person in the Trinity, the Word; so that both 
natures are but one person. As the soul and body of a man, though different and 
distinct <pb n="347" id="iv.ii-Page_347" />in their nature; or are two different natures, considered 
in themselves; yet in union with each other, are but one person.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.ii-p147">2. What is true and may be affirmed of either nature, divine and 
human, is true, and may be affirmed of this person, Jesus Christ, the Redeemer. 
This same person is God, and he is man. This person was in heaven, and was visible 
on earth at the same time. “No man hath ascended up to heaven, but he that came 
down from heaven, <i>even the Son of man which is in heaven</i>.”<note n="343" id="iv.ii-p147.1"><p class="normal" id="iv.ii-p148"><scripRef id="iv.ii-p148.1" passage="John iii. 13" parsed="|John|3|13|0|0" osisRef="Bible:John.3.13">John iii. 
13</scripRef>.</p></note> This person who is God-man, Immanuel, God with us, God manifest in the 
flesh, was put to death in the flesh, that is, in the human nature. He died on the 
cross, and his blood was poured out there. This being the death, the blood of this 
person, it was the blood of God, because this person was God.<note n="344" id="iv.ii-p148.2"><p class="normal" id="iv.ii-p149"><scripRef id="iv.ii-p149.1" passage="Acts xx. 28" parsed="|Acts|20|28|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Acts.20.28">Acts xx. 28</scripRef>.</p></note> 
This person is omniscient and unchangeable in his divine nature; but the human nature 
of this person is not omniscient, nor unchangeable, but did increase in stature, 
knowledge and wisdom.<note n="345" id="iv.ii-p149.2"><p class="normal" id="iv.ii-p150"><scripRef id="iv.ii-p150.1" passage="Luke ii. 52" parsed="|Luke|2|52|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Luke.2.52">Luke ii. 52</scripRef>.</p></note> As God, he is omnipotent and independent; 
as man, he is altogether dependent. Many other instances of this kind might be mentioned; 
but these are sufficient to illustrate the observation which has now been mentioned 
concerning this wonderful, complex person, including two natures perfectly distinct, 
and infinitely different one from the other.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.ii-p151">This matter may be farther explained, and rendered more intelligible, 
perhaps, by considering the person of a man. Every man is a complex person, consisting 
of body and soul, of very distinct and different natures, and yet so united, as 
to make one person. What is true of one of these two parts or natures of man, is 
not true of both. The body is mortal, the soul is not. The body has dimensions, 
and visible shape and countenance; the soul has nothing of these, and is not capable 
of them. And yet, what is true of either of these different parts or natures, is 
true of the person consisting of these parts. The same person is mortal, as to his 
body; but is immortal, as to his mind. The person <i>dies</i>, but it is only in 
one of the constituent parts <pb n="348" id="iv.ii-Page_348" />of his person, his body. Therefore this 
same person may live, when his body is dead. This person, consisting of body and 
soul, is intelligent, does think and reason. This is true of the person, because 
his mind is intelligent, thinks and reasons; while his body is not capable of this, 
&amp;c. &amp;c.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.ii-p152">3. These two distinct and infinitely different natures, united 
in the person of Jesus Christ, are not transformed into each other, so that one 
becomes the other by this personal union; but remain as distinct and different, 
in this respect, as if there were no such personal union. The human nature is not 
God, and has not any of the attributes peculiar to divinity, any more than if it 
were not united to divinity. And the divine nature of Christ is no more a creature, 
and has no more the peculiar properties of a man, than if no such personal union 
of these natures had taken place. Therefore,</p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.ii-p153">4. This personal union of the divine nature, or of God in the 
second person of the Godhead, with the human nature, does not cause or suppose any 
change in the former: But as God, this person is unchangeable. The human nature 
is assumed, or taken into a personal union with the second person of the Trinity, 
without any change in the divinity or divine nature; And all the change, or that 
is changeable, is in the human nature.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.ii-p154">5. The personality of Jesus Christ is in his divine nature, and 
not in the human. Jesus Christ existed a distinct divine person from eternity, the 
second person in the adorable Trinity. The human nature which this divine person, 
the Word, assumed into a personal union with himself, is not, and never was, a distinct 
person by itself; and personality cannot be ascribed to it, and does not belong 
to it, any otherwise than as united to the Logos, the Word of God. The Word assumed 
the <i>human nature</i>, not a <i>human person</i>, into a personal union with himself, 
by which this complex person exists, God-man. Had the second person in the Trinity 
taken a human person into union with himself, and were this possible, Jesus Christ, 
God and man, would be <i>two persons</i>, not one. Hence, when Jesus <pb n="349" id="iv.ii-Page_349" />
Christ is spoken of as being <i>a man</i>, “the son of man, the <i>man</i> 
Christ Jesus, &amp;c.”—these terms do not express the <i>personality</i> of the manhood, 
or of the human nature of Jesus Christ; but these personal terms are used with respect 
to the human nature, as united to a divine person, and not as a <i>mere man</i>. 
For the personal terms, <i>He, I</i>, and <i>Thou</i>, cannot, with propriety, or 
truth, be used by, or of the human nature, considered as distinct from the divine 
nature of Jesus Christ.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.ii-p155">6. The mode or manner of the union of the two natures, divine 
and human, in one person, cannot be described nor conceived by us, it being entirely 
above our comprehension. This does not, however, render it in the least degree incredible. 
For could it be comprehended, it would not be a real union, much less a union of 
the divine nature with the human. For if we cannot comprehend, or have any clear 
conception of the personal union of our own souls with our bodies; how much more 
inconceivable must this high and singular union be to us, by which Deity and humanity 
are united, and become one person!</p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.ii-p156">7. The human nature of Jesus Christ is doubtless unspeakably greater 
and more excellent than any other creature. This individual of the human race, being 
raised up to a personal union with him who is God, is the first and chief of all 
elect creatures, the greatest and most peculiar favourite; and is under the greatest 
advantages to advance in knowledge and holiness, being brought nearest to God of 
any creature, and receiving peculiar and more copious communications from him. It 
is with respect to his human nature, that John the Baptist speaks, when he says 
of Jesus Christ, “God giveth not the spirit by measure unto him.”<note n="346" id="iv.ii-p156.1"><p class="normal" id="iv.ii-p157"><scripRef id="iv.ii-p157.1" passage="John iii. 34" parsed="|John|3|34|0|0" osisRef="Bible:John.3.34">John iii. 
34</scripRef>.</p></note> As Jesus Christ increased in wisdom, in knowledge, and holiness, in the 
human nature, when in this world; so he will doubtless increase in this, and in 
degrees of existence without end; and make more rapid advances than any mere creature 
in proportion to the greater favours, and the special advantages enjoyed in the 
near and peculiar union to the Deity, and the high and important station and offices 
to <pb n="350" id="iv.ii-Page_350" />which the human nature is advanced. May we not from this, and other 
considerations which might be mentioned, safely conclude, that the human nature 
of Jesus Christ, is greater in capacity, in knowledge and holiness, and has, or 
will have, without end, more or a greater degree of existence, worth and happiness, 
not only than any mere creature, but more and greater than the whole redeemed church, 
and even all the elect angels, were the latter summed up together? The former, when 
put in the balance, may exceed it, to a degree beyond all our present conceptions.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.ii-p158">8. The human nature of Jesus Christ began to exist when it was 
conceived in the virgin Mary, and not before. The scripture history of his conception 
and birth, or the incarnation, and all that is said of it, naturally leads to this 
conclusion. The reader will have no other idea suggested to his mind, unless he 
has some particular end to answer by rejecting it; or puts a sense on some other 
passages of scripture, which is inconsistent with it. Such there have been in former 
ages, and such there are now in the christian world, who are confident that the 
soul, or rational creature, which was united to a body in the incarnation, did not 
then begin to exist, but is the first creature that was made, &amp;c. And they have 
thought that this sentiment is supported by a number of passages in the Bible. But 
the writers who have opposed them in this, it is thought, have made it evident that 
the passages which they allege assert no such thing; but are perfectly consistent 
with the human nature of Jesus Christ beginning to exist at his incarnation.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.ii-p159">The doctrine of the pre-existence of the soul of Jesus Christ, 
or of that created nature which took a body in the womb of the virgin Mary, appears 
first to be invented and propagated by Arius, in the fourth century, and, since 
his time, by his followers. He denied the divinity of Jesus Christ, or that he is 
the true God equal with the Father; and asserted that he is a mere creature. And 
in order to support his notion of the Redeemer, and make it consistent with many 
passages of scripture which represent him as existing before his incarnation, and 
from the beginning, and speak <pb n="351" id="iv.ii-Page_351" />of his creating the world, &amp;c. which 
his opposers used, to prove that he is a divine person, or the true God, he invented 
this scheme, and applied them to this pre-existing creature.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.ii-p160">This creature, they suppose, was the first creature that was made, 
and the greatest and most exalted of all creatures, and in this sense is “the first 
born of every creature; and the beginning of the creation of God.” That he made 
the world, and had the government of it, at least in some degree, before his incarnation. 
That he is the Logos, or the Word, which became flesh, and dwelt among men, by taking 
a body in the womb of the virgin Mary, and being born of her. Thus this glorious 
creature, who was greater and more honourable than the angels, and placed far above 
them, in the highest and most dignified station, and made in a sense, a God, and 
appeared in the form of God, being nevertheless, but a mere creature, made himself 
of no reputation, and took upon him the form of a servant, and was made in the likeness 
of men, &amp;c.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.ii-p161">There are others, especially of late, who, though they profess 
to believe that Jesus Christ is God, in a sense in which the Arians deny it; and 
that the human nature has a personal union with Deity; yet hold with the Arians, 
that the created nature of the Redeemer, his body excepted, existed before his incarnation, 
and was the first creature that was created, &amp;c. They think this to be asserted 
in several places of scripture; and that many others cannot be well explained on 
any other supposition. It has been observed, that the divines who have opposed this 
scheme, have shewn that all these passages of scripture which have been adduced 
in favour of it, import no such thing; but are perfectly consistent with the human 
nature of Christ beginning to exist at his incarnation. The labour of repeating 
what has been written to this purpose, will not now be undertaken, as it may be 
found in most commentators on the Bible, and in their writings who have opposed 
the Arian scheme. It may be proper, however, to take notice of two expressions in 
scripture, which the favourers of this notion have thought to be most express in 
their favour. Jesus Christ says of himself that he is, “The <pb n="352" id="iv.ii-Page_352" />beginning 
of the creation of God.”<note n="347" id="iv.ii-p161.1"><p class="normal" id="iv.ii-p162"><scripRef id="iv.ii-p162.1" passage="Rev. iii. 14" parsed="|Rev|3|14|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Rev.3.14">Rev. iii. 14</scripRef>.</p></note> That is, say they, the first 
creature that was created by God. But these words do not, by the most natural construction, 
express any such idea. If he existed before the creation of any thing, and did himself
<i>begin</i> and finish the creation of God; and is the head and Lord of the creation, 
and head over <i>all things</i> to the church, all which we have seen the scripture 
affirm of him; what words could more clearly, and in the most concise manner, express 
all this than these, “The beginning of the creation of God?” Jesus Christ says of 
himself repeatedly, in this book of the revelation, “I am the <i>beginning</i> and 
the end, the <i>first</i> and the last.” By which, is not meant that he <i>began</i> 
to exist, or was created the first of all; but directly the contrary, viz. that 
he existed <i>without beginning</i>, and without end, and is the author, the creator, 
or <i>beginner</i> of all things.<note n="348" id="iv.ii-p162.2"><p class="normal" id="iv.ii-p163"><scripRef id="iv.ii-p163.1" passage="Rev. i. 8" parsed="|Rev|1|8|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Rev.1.8">Rev. i. 8</scripRef>, <scripRef passage="Rev 21:6" id="iv.ii-p163.2" parsed="|Rev|21|6|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Rev.21.6">
xxi. 6</scripRef>, <scripRef passage="Rev 22:15" id="iv.ii-p163.3" parsed="|Rev|22|15|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Rev.22.15">xxii. 15</scripRef>.</p></note> Jesus 
Christ is called, “The first born of every creature,” or, as it might be more properly 
rendered. The first born <i>of the whole creation</i>.<note n="349" id="iv.ii-p163.4"><p class="normal" id="iv.ii-p164"><scripRef id="iv.ii-p164.1" passage="Col. i. 15" parsed="|Col|1|15|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Col.1.15">Col. i. 15</scripRef>.</p></note> 
This, they plead, imports that he is the first creature that was made. But the scripture 
no where expresses creation by <i>being born</i>: nor is this the natural import 
of the word. Therefore, these words do not appear to suggest that the <i>Son of 
God</i>, of whom the apostle is speaking, was <i>created</i> the first of all creatures. 
There is a more natural and easy sense, consistent with the human nature of Christ 
beginning to exist at his incarnation. The first born had the preeminence in the 
family, and was in a peculiar sense the heir. In ancient times, the first born was 
much distinguished from the rest of the family. He was of course, after his father, 
the ruler, the king, and priest in the family. Agreeable to this, Jacob addresses 
his first born son in the following words; “Reuben, thou art my <i>first born</i>, 
my might, and the beginning of my strength, the excellency of dignity, and the excellency 
of power.”<note n="350" id="iv.ii-p164.2"><p class="normal" id="iv.ii-p165"><scripRef id="iv.ii-p165.1" passage="Gen. xlix. 3" parsed="|Gen|49|3|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Gen.49.3">Gen. xlix. 3</scripRef>.</p></note> 
The first born was, in a peculiar sense, the heir; and by his birth had a right 
to the blessing, and a double portion. Thus Esau, being the first born of Isaac, 
was heir to the blessing of his father, and to pre-eminence in all <pb n="353" id="iv.ii-Page_353" />
respects, as his <i>birth right</i>. In Israel, the first born were in a peculiar 
sense appropriated to God, and heirs of a double honour and portion, the peculiar 
favourites. These, in the family of Aaron, were heirs to the high priesthood; and 
the first born of the kings were heirs of the kingdom. With reference to this, the 
redeemed are called, “the church of the <i>first born</i>,”<note n="351" id="iv.ii-p165.2"><p class="normal" id="iv.ii-p166"><scripRef id="iv.ii-p166.1" passage="Heb. xii. 23" parsed="|Heb|12|23|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Heb.12.23">Heb. xii. 23</scripRef>.</p></note> 
God says to Pharaoh, “Israel is my son, even my <i>first born</i>.”<note n="352" id="iv.ii-p166.2"><p class="normal" id="iv.ii-p167"><scripRef id="iv.ii-p167.1" passage="Exod. iv. 22" parsed="|Exod|4|22|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Exod.4.22">Exod. 
iv. 22</scripRef>.</p></note> 
And he says, “I am a father to Israel, and Ephraim is my <i>first born</i>—My dear 
son, a pleasant child.”<note n="353" id="iv.ii-p167.2"><p class="normal" id="iv.ii-p168"><scripRef id="iv.ii-p168.1" passage="Jer. xxxi. 9" parsed="|Jer|31|9|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Jer.31.9">Jer. xxxi. 9</scripRef>, <scripRef passage="Jer 31:20" id="iv.ii-p168.2" parsed="|Jer|31|20|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Jer.31.20">20</scripRef>.</p></note> In these passages first born 
has no reference to priority of existence; but to pre-eminence, and their being 
subjects of peculiar favours, honours, and privileges. In this sense, it is predicted 
of Christ, “I will make him my <i>first born</i>, higher than the kings of the earth.”<note n="354" id="iv.ii-p168.3"><p class="normal" id="iv.ii-p169">
<scripRef id="iv.ii-p169.1" passage="Psalm lxxxix. 27" parsed="|Ps|89|27|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Ps.89.27">Psalm lxxxix. 27</scripRef>.</p></note> 
When all this is considered, who can be at a loss about the meaning of the expression 
before us? “The first born of the whole creation.” He is the highest, most 
honourable, the peculiar favourite, the king, the head and the heir of the whole 
creation; in all things having the pre-eminence above every other creature; for 
all things were created <i>for him</i>.<note n="355" id="iv.ii-p169.2"><p class="normal" id="iv.ii-p170"><scripRef passage="Psa 89:16" id="iv.ii-p170.1" parsed="|Ps|89|16|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Ps.89.16">Verse 
16</scripRef>.</p></note> The apostle fully explains himself in these and the following 
words, “And he is the <i>head of the body, the church</i>, who is the beginning, 
the first born from the dead; <i>that in all things he might have the pre-eminence</i>.” 
In this sense, “he is the <i>first born</i> among many brethren.”<note n="356" id="iv.ii-p170.2"><p class="normal" id="iv.ii-p171"><scripRef id="iv.ii-p171.1" passage="Rom. vii. 29" parsed="|Rom|7|29|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Rom.7.29">Rom. vii. 
29</scripRef>.</p></note> But if we understand his being the first born of every creature, as expressing 
his priority of existence to the whole creation, it must be understood not of his 
human, but of his divine nature; for this person exists before all, worlds, and 
without beginning, as has been proved. Agreeable to this, the apostle goes on to 
say,<note n="357" id="iv.ii-p171.2"><p class="normal" id="iv.ii-p172"><scripRef passage="Rom 7:17" id="iv.ii-p172.1" parsed="|Rom|7|17|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Rom.7.17">Verse 17</scripRef>.</p></note> 
”And he is before all things, and by him all things consist.” This is true of this 
person, but cannot be true of the human nature, that it exists <i>before all things</i>, 
that is, all created things.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.ii-p173">But it may be farther observed, that it is not only consistent 
with the whole of divine revelation, to consider the human nature of the Redeemer, 
as beginning <pb n="354" id="iv.ii-Page_354" />to exist at his incarnation; and not only that no important 
or good end is answered by the contrary supposition: But it appears to be contrary 
to the current of scripture, and of a dangerous and bad tendency. For,</p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.ii-p174"><i>First</i>. This notion appears inconsistent with the true and 
real manhood of Jesus Christ, or with his taking upon him the human nature, and 
being a real man, which the scripture abundantly asserts, as we have seen» If the 
creature w4iich took a body by the incarnation were the first and greatest creature 
that was ever created, he was no more a man, no more like and akin to the human 
race, or the nature of man, than the angels; but was more distant from man than 
they, as he was much greater and higher than they. But if an angel should take upon 
him a real human body, this would not make him a man, or one of the human race. 
Gabriel, indeed, who was sent from heaven to Daniel, is called “The man Gabriel;” 
and the angels which appeared to Lot, and to the women who visited the sepulchre 
where Christ had been laid, are called <i>men</i>; because they appeared in the 
shape of men: But no one supposes they were real men; nor would they have been any 
more so, had they been united to real bodies. A man has not only a human body, but 
a human soul; both these are essential constituents of human nature, and necessary 
to make a man. The angelic nature, or superangelic, as such a supposed creature 
may be called, does not, and cannot be made human nature, or be made a real man, 
so as to be one of the human race, by uniting to a human body. He still will be 
an angel, or a creature of a higher order, and not a man. A distinction is made 
between angels and men, or the seed of Abraham, and it is said, that Jesus did not 
unite himself to the former, but to the latter. “For as much as the children are 
partakers of flesh and blood, he also himself likewise took part of the same. For 
verily he took not an him the nature of angels; but he took on him the seed of Abraham.”<note n="358" id="iv.ii-p174.1"><p class="normal" id="iv.ii-p175">
<scripRef id="iv.ii-p175.1" passage="Heb. ii. 14" parsed="|Heb|2|14|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Heb.2.14">Heb. ii. 14</scripRef>, <scripRef passage="Heb 2:16" id="iv.ii-p175.2" parsed="|Heb|2|16|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Heb.2.16">16</scripRef>.</p></note> Had the Eternal <span class="sc" id="iv.ii-p175.3">Word</span> united himself 
to an angel, and taken a human body, he would have been an angel, and not a man; 
not the seed of the woman, or of Abraham. This would not have formed the relation 
of <i>brethren</i> between him and mankind; but between him and angels.</p>

<pb n="355" id="iv.ii-Page_355" />

<p class="normal" id="iv.ii-p176">“It behoved him to be made like unto his brethren <i>in all things</i>;”<note n="359" id="iv.ii-p176.1"><p class="normal" id="iv.ii-p177">
<scripRef id="iv.ii-p177.1" passage="Heb. ii. 17" parsed="|Heb|2|17|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Heb.2.17">Heb. ii. 17</scripRef>.</p></note> which he could not have been, had he not taken upon him human 
nature, consisting in a human soul and body. Had he united himself to an angel, 
or any other creature of an higher order, and then that creature, united by the
<span class="sc" id="iv.ii-p177.2">Word</span>, have taken a human body, he would not have been made
<i>in all things</i> like unto his brethren; but on the contrary, he would have 
taken but a very inconsiderable part of the human nature; and be far from being 
a man. This supposed first and greatest creature cannot, with any propriety or truth, 
be called a <i>human soul</i>, more than any other supposable, or possible creature 
that could be made: Nor would his union to a human body make him any more a human 
soul, than if he were not so united. A human soul comes into existence in union 
with the body, by which human nature, or the human creature, comes into existence.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.ii-p178">If this argument has any weight in it, is it not a sufficient 
reason for rejecting a scheme which does not appear to have any foundation in the 
sacred Oracles, and will not give any better or more exalted conceptions of the 
Redeemer, than the common opinion, which views his human nature as beginning to 
exist at the incarnation? But there are other objections to this scheme: For,</p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.ii-p179"><i>Secondly</i>, If only the body of Jesus came into existence, 
and was formed in the womb of the virgin Mary, he could not be really her son, or 
the Son of man, conceived by her, in her womb, as the scripture says he was. She 
who conceives and brings forth a son, is as really, and as much the mother of his 
soul, as of his body, and the former is conceived and formed in her womb as much 
as the latter; and is the greater and chief part of the child or son; yea, the most 
essential part, without which he would not be a son; but a monster, a body without 
a soul. Therefore, Mary’s conception of her son did imply the conception of soul 
and body, otherwise she could not be said to conceive a son. The virgin Mary, and 
Elizabeth, are each of them said to conceive a son.<note n="360" id="iv.ii-p179.1"><p class="normal" id="iv.ii-p180"><scripRef id="iv.ii-p180.1" passage="Luke i. 31" parsed="|Luke|1|31|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Luke.1.31">Luke i. 31</scripRef>, <scripRef passage="Luke 1:36" id="iv.ii-p180.2" parsed="|Luke|1|36|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Luke.1.36">36</scripRef>.</p></note> 
All must allow that the latter conceived a child, with a human soul and body; otherwise 
<pb n="356" id="iv.ii-Page_356" />it would not have been the conception of a son. And why must not Mary’s 
conception of a son imply the same? If not, how could he be her son, conceived by 
her?</p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.ii-p181">It is a mistake which some have made, who have supposed that the 
parents of a child, are the parents or authors of the body, and are instruments 
of producing that only, and not the soul of the child. They are the cause of one 
as much as the other, and no more. They are not the <i>efficient</i> cause of either. 
God is the cause of the existence of both soul and body; of the latter just as much 
as the other; both come into existence according to a law of nature, by which parents 
are made the instrumental cause of the production of the child, consisting of both 
soul and body. The mother, therefore, according to a law of nature, conceives both 
the soul and body of her son; she does as much towards the one, as towards the other, 
and is equally the instrumental cause of both; and God is as much the efficient, 
and immediate cause of the existence of the one as of the other. The human nature 
of Jesus was conceived not according to a stated law of nature; but in a miraculous 
way: Yet Mary as really conceived him, and he was as really her son, as if he had 
been conceived, according to the ordinary course of nature. But he was not conceived 
by her, neither could he be her son, if his soul, or that creature which took a 
body in her womb, had existed a mighty, glorious creature, thousands of years before 
this, as in this case she must have conceived nothing but a body; which is no conception, 
according to the proper use of the word; and could not be a son.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.ii-p182"><i>Thirdly</i>, We find it is the way and manner of the governor 
of the world, first to put his creatures, who are moral agents, upon trial, that 
through the appointed time of trial they may exercise and manifest submission to 
him, and obedience to the law and commands under which they are placed, before he 
admits them to glory, and publicly confirms them in happiness, that the latter may 
be the reward of the former, as a testimony of his approbation of their obedience; 
and this appears highly reasonable and proper. To make a creature and set <pb n="357" id="iv.ii-Page_357" />
him above every other creature, and confer upon him great and distinguishing honours, 
as being the greatest favourite, without putting him in a state of trial, and before 
he had performed any signal act of obedience, would be contrary to God’s way of 
dealing with his creatures, so far as our acquaintance reaches, and would be very 
unreasonable, and altogether unbecoming the moral governor of the world, so far 
as we can judge. But the notion of the pre-existence of the human nature of Jesus 
Christ, (if on this plan it can be properly called human nature, or a human soul, 
which indeed it cannot) supposes that God has dealt so with this creature. He made 
him the first and highest of all creatures; and honoured him by making him the creator 
of all things, visible and invisible, angels and men; or using him as the great 
agent or instrument in this work; and set him over all creatures and things, as 
the director and governor of all worlds, in a state of high exaltation and glory; 
in which he continued four thousand years, before the great trial of his obedience 
took place. This therefore, is not to be admitted as true, or any part of the divine 
plan and conduct, without some cogent reasons which have not yet been produced; 
or unless it be plainly asserted in divine revelation, which is so far from being 
true, that it seems to speak a contrary language.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.ii-p183">But if, contrary to this notion, the human nature of Jesus Christ 
first began to exist at the incarnation, and he increased in wisdom and stature 
until he arrived to manhood, in a state and circumstances of trial; and persevered 
in a state of temptation, trial and suffering, and in obedience, in the form of 
a servant, unto death, even the death of the cross; and after this, and as a reward 
for such obedience and sufferings, “God hath highly exalted him, and given him a 
name above every name;”—This is perfectly agreeable to God’s conduct as moral governor 
of the world in other instances; and appears to be most reasonable and proper, and 
is suited to answer the best ends.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.ii-p184"><i>Fourthly</i>, The doctrine of the pre-existence of the creature, 
which was united to the human body in the womb of the virgin Mary, not only has 
no foundation <pb n="358" id="iv.ii-Page_358" />in divine revelation, and is useless and unreasonable; 
but appears to be of a dangerous and bad tendency.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.ii-p185">Arius, and his followers, have espoused this notion in order to 
support, and render more plausible their denial of the divinity of Jesus Christ, 
or that he is truly God as well as man. By applying those passages of scripture 
to this supposed creature, which their opposers adduced to prove his divinity, and 
applied to Christ as God, and the second person in the Trinity; which has occasioned 
so much dispute in the christian world, in the fourth century, and since. It was 
therefore first advanced and improved to support an error, which really subverts 
Christianity. This gives just ground of suspicion, that it is itself an error: And 
it ought not to be received, until it be carefully examined and found to be well 
supported, and clearly asserted by divine oracles.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.ii-p186">And though many who now embrace this notion of the pre-existence 
of the human nature of Jesus Christ, do not consider themselves as giving up his 
divinity; or that they are doing any thing in the least inconsistent with this doctrine, 
or that tends in any degree to weaken or injure it; but hold that this pre-existing 
creature was united to the Deity, so as to be a divine person, and not a mere creature; 
yet they, by applying all or most of those passages of scripture to this dignified 
creature, which they who do not admit this opinion consider as properly applicable 
to the second person in the Trinity, who in the fulness of time took upon him human 
nature, do, in a measure, at least, obscure and weaken the doctrine of the divinity 
of Christ; and that of the Trinity of persons in the Deity; and hereby give great 
advantage to those who deny and oppose these doctrines.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.ii-p187">And this is rather confirmed, than otherwise, by fact and experience; 
since many, if not most of those who have embraced this sentiment of the pre-existence 
of the human nature of the Redeemer, give up the doctrine of the Trinity, of three 
distinct persons subsisting eternally in one God, independent of his works, or manner 
of operation, or at least doubt about the truth of it; and are rather inclined to 
consider this <i>first and greatest creature</i>, <pb n="359" id="iv.ii-Page_359" />as a divine person, 
by a peculiar union to Deity, or to God; not considering him as subsisting in three 
persons, or in any sense three, considered in himself; but only in his different 
manner of acting, and distinct offices in his relation to his creatures, and works 
respecting them. And as this notion takes away and annihilates the divinity of Christ, 
as a distinct person in the Godhead, it tends to obscure and even remove the idea 
of his being really and properly God, and to consider him as a creature no otherwise 
united to God, than by having the divine presence and assistance in a peculiar and 
extraordinary manner and degree; and enjoying the peculiar favour and love of the 
Deity: That his divinity consists in this, and nothing more; and that his personality 
consists wholly in his nature, as a creature, as a distinct person from all other 
creatures, and vastly superior to them all; and not in his divinity, or divine nature. 
And as this scheme makes the Logos, or Word, to be the first and greatest of all 
creatures, they apply all those passages of scripture which speak of Jesus Christ 
before his incarnation to this creature, who, by taking the human body, became a 
man. Thus they are naturally, and even necessarily, led to give up the divinity 
of Jesus Christ, as it has been held by those who have acknowledged and adored him 
as the true God; and find themselves not to differ in their idea of the Redeemer, 
in any thing essential or important from the Arians, who have always denied the 
divinity of Christ, as it has been held by the greatest part of professing christians, 
in all ages. And this has been realized by fact in too many instances, of those 
who have embraced the notion of the pre-existence of the human nature of Christ. 
They have gone on to disbelieve and deny that he is truly God, or at least, to hesitate 
and doubt of it. And there is reason to fear, and even to expect, that if this notion 
prevails, a denial of the real divinity of the Redeemer will keep pace with it, 
and Jesus Christ, instead of being honoured by it, will be degraded infinitely below 
what he has been believed to be by the christian church in general, in all ages, 
and deprived of the honours which have been given to him; and which <pb n="360" id="iv.ii-Page_360" />
are ascribed to him in the divine oracles, as has been proved above.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.ii-p188">When all this is well considered, viz. That the doctrine of the 
pre-existence of Jesus Christ, as a creature, is no where expressly, or by implication, 
asserted in the scripture, and is not so consistent with it, as the contrary doctrine;—:hat 
it is at best a useless notion, and can answer no good end;—that it is not reasonable, 
and is contrary to the divine conduct, as moral governor;—that it is inconsistent 
with his being a real man, or the son of the virgin Mary;—that it appears in theory, 
and from fact and experience, to be of a dangerous and bad tendency; even to the 
dishonour of Christ, and the denial of his divinity; and consequently to sap the 
very foundation of christianity;—that it has been invented and propagated by those 
who have denied that the Redeemer of men is the true God, equal with the Father, 
in order to render their opposition to this doctrine more plausible;—that the best 
and most sound part of the church, and those who have been most eminent for wisdom 
and grace, and a conduct most agreeable to the gospel, have not received but rejected 
this doctrine:—If all this appears to be true; or if it be in part, and in some 
measure agreeable to the truth; may not this notion be rejected with safety and 
a degree of confidence? Yea, ought we not to renounce it, and embrace the contrary, 
which has been received by the christian church in general, from the days of the 
apostles, and supported by the best divines?</p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.ii-p189">9. The human nature of Jesus Christ never was tainted with the 
least moral corruption; but is perfectly holy. This is repeatedly asserted of him 
in the scriptures; and was absolutely necessary in order to his being the Redeemer 
of man. “For such an high priest became us, who is holy, harmless, undefiled» separate 
from sinners, and made higher than the heavens.”<note n="361" id="iv.ii-p189.1"><p class="normal" id="iv.ii-p190"><scripRef id="iv.ii-p190.1" passage="Heb. vii. 26" parsed="|Heb|7|26|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Heb.7.26">Heb. vii. 26</scripRef>.</p></note> But 
how he could be a man, descend from Adam, and be really one of the human race, and 
not partake of the common corruption of mankind, has been a question of no small 
importance. This inquiry is answered by observing. That though by a divine <pb n="361" id="iv.ii-Page_361" />
constitution, all the posterity of Adam in a constituted natural way, or according 
to the established course of nature, are born in a state of total moral corruption, 
in consequence of his apostasy; which has been proved in a former chapter; yet this 
did not reach or affect the human nature of Jesus Christ, as he was conceived and 
born in a supernatural and miraculous way, and had no human father.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.ii-p191">When the constitution and covenant was made with Adam, and his 
natural posterity, it was not determined by any thing in this constitution, that 
there would be any such person as that of the Mediator, as it did not appear by 
any thing in that covenant, that there would be any need of a Redeemer; he was not, 
therefore, included in this constitution and covenant, as all the natural posterity 
of Adam were; but was introduced in consequence of the breach of that covenant; 
consequently, he did not partake of the moral pollution and depravity which came 
upon the natural posterity of Adam, who were included in that covenant. And he is 
not only not one included in the covenant made with Adam; as he does not descend 
from him in the ordinary, natural way; but he is “the Lord from heaven.” The 
human nature of Christ began to exist in a personal union with the second person 
in the Triune God, and so is infinitely distinguished from the rest of the children 
of Adam.”<note n="362" id="iv.ii-p191.1"><p class="normal" id="iv.ii-p192"><scripRef id="iv.ii-p192.1" passage="1 Cor. xv. 47" parsed="|1Cor|15|47|0|0" osisRef="Bible:1Cor.15.47">1 Cor. xv. 47</scripRef>.</p></note></p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.ii-p193">10. The incarnation of Jesus Christ, or his becoming man, by his 
taking the human nature into a personal union with the divine, is no part of his 
humiliation, nor is, in itself, in any respect or degree, degrading, laying aside, 
or hindering his glory. The manner and circumstances of his incarnation, in his 
being born of a poor virgin, in an infant state, and lodged in a stable, and attended 
with the innocent infirmities of the human nature, and in it suffering disgrace, 
pain and death, are all parts of the humiliation of Christ; but the incarnation 
itself is no part of it. If it were, he would be in a state of humiliation now, 
and forever hereafter; for he is a man now, and will continue to be such a person 
eternally.</p>
<pb n="362" id="iv.ii-Page_362" />
<p class="normal" id="iv.ii-p194">The union of the divine nature with the human, is an instance 
of wonderful <i>condescension</i> and grace, and will be celebrated as such, by 
the redeemed forever. But the second person in the Trinity will not be less, but 
more honoured and glorious forever, than if he were not man, as well as God.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.ii-p195">III. <span class="sc" id="iv.ii-p195.1">The</span> Redeemer is the Son of God, in 
a peculiar and appropriated sense, and by which he is distinguished from every other 
person in the universe. He is therefore called the <i>first begotten</i>, or first 
born son of God: his <i>only begotten son</i>; <i>his own son</i>; and eminently
<i>The Son</i>, and <i>The Son of the Father</i>. His <i>dear Son</i>; or, as it 
is in the original, <i>The Son of his love</i>; His <i>beloved Son, in whom he is 
well pleased</i>. “For he received from God the Father, honour and glory, when there 
came such a voice to him from the excellent glory. This is my beloved Son, in whom 
I am well pleased.”<note n="363" id="iv.ii-p195.2"><p class="normal" id="iv.ii-p196"><scripRef id="iv.ii-p196.1" passage="2 Peter i. 17" parsed="|2Pet|1|17|0|0" osisRef="Bible:2Pet.1.17">2 Peter i. 17</scripRef>.</p></note> He is “The only begotten Son,
<i>which is in the bosom of the Father</i>.”<note n="364" id="iv.ii-p196.2"><p class="normal" id="iv.ii-p197"><scripRef id="iv.ii-p197.1" passage="John i. 18" parsed="|John|1|18|0|0" osisRef="Bible:John.1.18">John i. 18</scripRef>.</p></note> Who only knows 
the Father; and none does or can reveal and make him known but the Son.<note n="365" id="iv.ii-p197.2"><p class="normal" id="iv.ii-p198"><scripRef id="iv.ii-p198.1" passage="Matt. xi. 27" parsed="|Matt|11|27|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Matt.11.27">Matt. 
xi. 27</scripRef> <scripRef passage="John 1:18" id="iv.ii-p198.2" parsed="|John|1|18|0|0" osisRef="Bible:John.1.18">John i. 18</scripRef>.</p></note> He being the 
brightness of his glory, and the express image of his person; he that hath seen 
the Son, hath seen the Father.<note n="366" id="iv.ii-p198.3"><p class="normal" id="iv.ii-p199"><scripRef id="iv.ii-p199.1" passage="John xiv. 9" parsed="|John|14|9|0|0" osisRef="Bible:John.14.9">John xiv. 9</scripRef>. <scripRef passage="Heb 1:3" id="iv.ii-p199.2" parsed="|Heb|1|3|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Heb.1.3">Heb. 
i. 3</scripRef>.</p></note> Which epithets and declarations distinguish him from all 
other sons; as much as his Father is distinguished from all other fathers. He is 
mentioned as the Son of God above <i>an hundred times</i> in the New Testament; 
and fifty times by the apostle John. And the Father of Jesus Christ, the Son, is 
mentioned above <i>two hundred and twenty times;</i> and more than one hundred and 
thirty times in the gospel and epistles of St. John. Jesus Christ often makes use 
of the epithets, <i>The Father, My Father</i>, &amp;c. This character is represented 
as essential to the Redeemer and peculiar to him, and is an essential article of 
the christian faith. This confession Peter made as the common faith of the disciples 
of Christ. “We believe, and are sure that thou art that Christ, the Son of the living 
God.”<note n="367" id="iv.ii-p199.3"><p class="normal" id="iv.ii-p200"><scripRef id="iv.ii-p200.1" passage="John vi. 69" parsed="|John|6|69|0|0" osisRef="Bible:John.6.69">John vi. 69</scripRef>. <scripRef passage="Matt 16:16" id="iv.ii-p200.2" parsed="|Matt|16|16|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Matt.16.16">Matt. xvi. 16</scripRef>.</p></note> 
This was the Eunuch’s faith, required in order to his being baptized. “I believe 
that Jesus Christ <i>is the Son of God</i>.”<note n="368" id="iv.ii-p200.3"><p class="normal" id="iv.ii-p201"><scripRef id="iv.ii-p201.1" passage="Acts viii. 37" parsed="|Acts|8|37|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Acts.8.37">Acts viii. 37</scripRef>.</p></note> And he 
who believes with all his heart, that Jesus Christ is the Son of God, hath <pb n="363" id="iv.ii-Page_363" />
the Son, and with him eternal life. When Peter made this confession, “Thou art Christ, 
the Son of the living God,” Christ said to him, “Blessed art thou; for flesh and 
blood hath not revealed it unto thee, but my Father which is in heaven.”<note n="369" id="iv.ii-p201.2"><p class="normal" id="iv.ii-p202"><scripRef id="iv.ii-p202.1" passage="Matt. xvi. 16" parsed="|Matt|16|16|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Matt.16.16">Matt. 
xvi. 16</scripRef>, <scripRef passage="Matt 16:17" id="iv.ii-p202.2" parsed="|Matt|16|17|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Matt.16.17">17</scripRef>.</p></note> “He that believeth on the Son hath everlasting life, and he 
that believeth not the Son, shall not see life.”<note n="370" id="iv.ii-p202.3"><p class="normal" id="iv.ii-p203"><scripRef id="iv.ii-p203.1" passage="John iii. 36" parsed="|John|3|36|0|0" osisRef="Bible:John.3.36">John iii. 36</scripRef>.</p></note> And 
John says, “Whosoever shall confess that Jesus is the Son of God, God dwelleth in 
him, and he in God. Who is he that overcometh the world, but he that believeth that 
Jesus is the Son of God! He that hath the Son, hath life; and he that hath not the 
Son of God, hath not life. These things have I written unto you <i>that believe 
on the name of the Son of God</i>: that ye may know ye have eternal life, and that 
ye may <i>believe on the name of the Son of God</i>.”<note n="371" id="iv.ii-p203.2"><p class="normal" id="iv.ii-p204"><scripRef id="iv.ii-p204.1" passage="1 John iv. 15" parsed="|1John|4|15|0|0" osisRef="Bible:1John.4.15">1 John iv. 15</scripRef>. <scripRef passage="1John 5:5,12,13" id="iv.ii-p204.2" parsed="|1John|5|5|0|0;|1John|5|12|0|0;|1John|5|13|0|0" osisRef="Bible:1John.5.5 Bible:1John.5.12 Bible:1John.5.13">
v. 5, 12, 13</scripRef>.</p></note></p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.ii-p205">It must be farther observed, that this title, the Son of God, 
is the <i>highest title</i> that is given to the Redeemer, and denotes his divinity, 
or that he is himself God, and therefore equal with the Father, if his divinity 
be any where expressed in the Bible; and that it is there abundantly declared, we 
have before shewed. He styles himself, and is called <i>The Son of Man</i>, more 
than <i>eighty times</i> in the New Testament, by which epithet his humanity is 
more especially denoted, but not excluding his divinity. And, on the contrary, he 
is called the Son of God, more particularly to express his infinitely superior character, 
his divinity or godhead. In this view, let the following passages be considered. 
When the angel who declared to the virgin Mary that she should be the mother of 
the Messiah, expressed to her the greatness of this her Son, he does it by saying 
that he should be called <i>the Son of the Highest, the Son of God</i>. “He shall 
be great, and shall be called the Son of the Highest. Therefore also that holy thing 
which shall be born of thee, shall be called the Son of God.”<note n="372" id="iv.ii-p205.1"><p class="normal" id="iv.ii-p206"><scripRef id="iv.ii-p206.1" passage="Luke i. 32" parsed="|Luke|1|32|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Luke.1.32">Luke i. 32</scripRef>, 
<scripRef passage="Luke 1:35" id="iv.ii-p206.2" parsed="|Luke|1|35|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Luke.1.35">35</scripRef>.</p></note>If this were not his greatest, his highest title and character, 
he most certainly would have given him a higher, and one that did fully express 
divinity. This, therefore, did express it in the fullest and strongest manner. And 
no one who <pb n="364" id="iv.ii-Page_364" />believes in the divinity of Christ, can, consistently, 
have any doubt of it. And when the Father gives him the highest encomium, and recommends 
him to men, as worthy of their highest regards, implicit obedience, and unlimited 
trust and confidence, and commands them thus to regard, love, trust in, and obey 
him, this is the highest character he gives him, by which his divinity is expressed, 
“This is <i>my beloved </i><span class="sc" id="iv.ii-p206.3">Son</span>, in whom lam well pleased: 
Hear ye him.” If this does not express his divinity, we may be sure divinity is 
no part of his character; and that he is not God. So, when Peter undertakes to express 
the idea he had of the high and glorious character of his Lord and Master, he does 
it in the following words, “Thou art the Christ, the Son of the living God.” If 
Peter believed the divinity of Christ, he certainly expressed this in these words; 
for he did not conceive of any higher character, that could be given in any other 
words. This also appears by Nathaniel’s using this epithet, when he was struck with 
wonder and surprise at the omniscience of Christ. “Rabbi, thou art <i>the </i>
<span class="sc" id="iv.ii-p206.4">Son </span><i>of God</i>, thou art the King of Israel.”<note n="373" id="iv.ii-p206.5"><p class="normal" id="iv.ii-p207"><scripRef id="iv.ii-p207.1" passage="John i. 49" parsed="|John|1|49|0|0" osisRef="Bible:John.1.49">John 
i. 49</scripRef>.</p></note> When our Lord Jesus Christ proposed himself to the man whom he had 
restored to sight, as the proper object of his faith and trust, he said to him, 
“Dost thou believe on the Son of God?” And when he told the man that he himself 
was the person, he said, “Lord, I believe. And he worshipped him.”<note n="374" id="iv.ii-p207.2"><p class="normal" id="iv.ii-p208"><scripRef id="iv.ii-p208.1" passage="John ix. 35" parsed="|John|9|35|0|0" osisRef="Bible:John.9.35">John ix. 
35</scripRef>, <scripRef passage="John 9:38" id="iv.ii-p208.2" parsed="|John|9|38|0|0" osisRef="Bible:John.9.38">38</scripRef>.</p></note> It appears from this, that <i>Son of God</i>, was the highest title 
which Jesus assumed, and that this had special reference to, and expressed his divinity; 
and therefore in this character, and as the Son of God, this pious man paid him 
divine honour, and worshipped him. When the disciples of our Lord, and all that 
were in the ship with them, had seen him walking upon the sea, in the midst of a 
terrible storm, and reducing the boisterous winds, and raging waves, to a calm, 
by his word and presence, they were struck with a fresh and affecting conviction 
of his divinity, that he was God, and expressed it by coming to him, falling down 
and worshipping him, “saying, of a truth, thou art the Son of God.”<note n="375" id="iv.ii-p208.3"><p class="normal" id="iv.ii-p209"><scripRef id="iv.ii-p209.1" passage="Matt. xiv. 33" parsed="|Matt|14|33|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Matt.14.33">Matt. 
xiv. 33</scripRef>.</p></note> 
In which words they expressed his divinity, and gave a <pb n="365" id="iv.ii-Page_365" />reason for 
their worshipping him, as their Lord and their God, viz. that they were sure from 
clear and abundant evidence, that he was the Son of God. The apostle John, when 
he would represent Jesus Christ in his highest and most glorious character, gives 
him this title, and adds, “This is the true God.” He says, “We know that the Son 
of God is come, and hath given us an understanding, that we may know him that is 
true: And we are in him that is true, <i>even</i> in his Son Jesus Christ. This 
is the true God, and eternal life.”<note n="376" id="iv.ii-p209.2"><p class="normal" id="iv.ii-p210"><scripRef id="iv.ii-p210.1" passage="1 John v. 20" parsed="|1John|5|20|0|0" osisRef="Bible:1John.5.20">1 John v. 20</scripRef>.</p></note></p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.ii-p211">It is to be farther observed, that when our Lord said to the Jews. 
“My Father worketh hitherto, and I work,” the Jews, therefore, sought the more to 
kill him, <i>because he said that God was his Father</i>, (<i>his own proper Father</i>, 
as it is in the original) <span class="sc" id="iv.ii-p211.1">making himself equal with God</span>.” 
This is to be understood as the sense which St. John the Evangelist puts upon the 
words of Christ, “My Father worketh hitherto, and I work.” For this was making himself 
equal with God the Father, as doing the same work with him: And this is represented 
as implied in God’s being <i>his own Father</i>; or in his being the Father’s own 
Son, the Son of God. But if we understand it as the sense which the Jews put upon 
the words of Christ, and that they said this was making himself equal with God, 
it amounts to the same thing; for it appears that their inference was just; and 
our Saviour is so far from denying it to be true, that in his reply to them, he 
confirms it, and asserts that whatsoever the Father does, the Son does the same; 
and instances in his raising the dead, and judging the world, and having all things, 
and all power in his hands. “That all men should honour the Son, even as they honour 
the Father.”<note n="377" id="iv.ii-p211.2"><p class="normal" id="iv.ii-p212"><scripRef id="iv.ii-p212.1" passage="John v. 17-18" parsed="|John|5|17|5|18" osisRef="Bible:John.5.17-John.5.18">John v. 17-18</scripRef>.</p></note> Thus he makes the Son equal with the Father. 
Hence it appears that to be the Son of God, and God’s own Son, is the same with 
a divine person, and denotes one who is truly God; and that this title is used to 
express the divinity, rather than the humanity of Jesus Christ.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.ii-p213">The same appears from what passed between our Lord and the Jews 
at another time. He said to them, “I and my Father are One.” This, they said, was 
blasphemy, because being a man, he made himself <pb n="366" id="iv.ii-Page_366" />God. It is plain from 
the answer which he makes to them that they considered him as a blasphemer, because 
he claimed to be the Son of God, by calling God his Father. “Say ye of him, 
whom the Father hath sanctified, and sent into the world, Thou blasphemest, because 
I said, <i>I am the Son of God</i>?” This was the blasphemy with which they charged 
him; because they considered his saying, that he was the Son of God, by calling 
God his Father, as an assertion that he was God.<note n="378" id="iv.ii-p213.1"><p class="normal" id="iv.ii-p214"><scripRef id="iv.ii-p214.1" passage="John x. 30" parsed="|John|10|30|0|0" osisRef="Bible:John.10.30">John x. 30</scripRef>, <scripRef passage="John 10:33" id="iv.ii-p214.2" parsed="|John|10|33|0|0" osisRef="Bible:John.10.33">33</scripRef>, <scripRef passage="John 10:36" id="iv.ii-p214.3" parsed="|John|10|36|0|0" osisRef="Bible:John.10.36">36</scripRef>.</p></note> 
And it appears, not only from this passage, but from others, that the Jews, and 
others, did affix the idea of divinity to the Son of God, and considered this title 
as expressing a character infinitely above a mere creature. When Jesus was arraigned 
before the Jewish council, the High Priest charged him with the solemnity of an 
oath, saying, “I adjure thee by the living God, that thou tell us, whether thou 
be the Christ, the Son of the living God.” And when Jesus answered in the affirmative, 
he with all the members of the council, charged him with blasphemy; and pronounced 
him worthy of death for making this claim.<note n="379" id="iv.ii-p214.4"><p class="normal" id="iv.ii-p215"><scripRef id="iv.ii-p215.1" passage="Matt. xxvi. 64" parsed="|Matt|26|64|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Matt.26.64">Matt. xxvi. 64</scripRef>, <scripRef passage="Matt 26:65" id="iv.ii-p215.2" parsed="|Matt|26|65|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Matt.26.65">65</scripRef>, <scripRef passage="Matt 26:66" id="iv.ii-p215.3" parsed="|Matt|26|66|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Matt.26.66">66</scripRef>.</p></note> 
And they brought this accusation against him to Pilate, “We have a law, and by our 
law he ought to die, because he made himself the Son of God. When, therefore, Pilate 
heard that saying, he was the more afraid.”<note n="380" id="iv.ii-p215.4"><p class="normal" id="iv.ii-p216"><scripRef id="iv.ii-p216.1" passage="John xix. 7" parsed="|John|19|7|0|0" osisRef="Bible:John.19.7">John xix. 7</scripRef>, <scripRef passage="John 19:8" id="iv.ii-p216.2" parsed="|John|19|8|0|0" osisRef="Bible:John.19.8">8</scripRef>.</p></note> By this, 
it is evident that Pilate considered the Son of God, to imply divinity. When the 
Centurion, and the guard who were with him, saw the earthquake and the other supernatural 
events which attended the crucifixion of Jesus Christ, “they feared greatly, saying. 
Truly this was the Son of God.”<note n="381" id="iv.ii-p216.3"><p class="normal" id="iv.ii-p217"><scripRef id="iv.ii-p217.1" passage="Matt. xxvii. 54" parsed="|Matt|27|54|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Matt.27.54">Matt. xxvii. 54</scripRef>.</p></note> 
From this, it is evident that they considered the Son of God to be more than a man, 
at least, if not really God.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.ii-p218">There was some idea and belief propagated among other nations, 
as well as the Jews, of an extraordinary personage, a divinity, who was denominated
<i>The Son of God</i>, and who was to make his appearance in the world. To this, 
Nebuchadnezzar doubtless had reference, when he said, that in a vision, he saw a 
fourth person, <pb n="367" id="iv.ii-Page_367" />walking in the midst of the fire of the furnace into 
which he had cast three men; and that none of them had been hurt by the fire; and 
the form of the fourth was <i>like the Son of God</i>.<note n="382" id="iv.ii-p218.1"><p class="normal" id="iv.ii-p219"><scripRef id="iv.ii-p219.1" passage="Dan. iii. 25" parsed="|Dan|3|25|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Dan.3.25">Dan. iii. 25</scripRef>.</p></note> 
And who but this divine person can be meant by Agur, when he says, “Who hath ascended 
up into heaven, or descended? Who hath gathered the wind in his fists? Who hath 
bound the waters in a garment? Who hath established all the ends of the earth? What 
is his name, <i>and what is his Son’s name</i>, if thou canst tell?”<note n="383" id="iv.ii-p219.2"><p class="normal" id="iv.ii-p220"><scripRef id="iv.ii-p220.1" passage="Prov. xxx. 4" parsed="|Prov|30|4|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Prov.30.4">Prov. 
xxx. 4</scripRef>.</p></note></p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.ii-p221">This epithet and character we find expressly mentioned by David, 
the divinely inspired king of Israel, in the second Psalm. And he is there introduced 
and described, as a divinity, who claims divine homage, trust, and worship, as the 
Omnipotent heir, possessor and ruler of the world. “I will declare the decree. The 
Lord hath said unto me, Thou art <span class="sc" id="iv.ii-p221.1">MY SON</span>, this day have I 
begotten thee. Ask of me, and I shall give thee the heathen for thine inheritance,
<i>and the uttermost parts of the earth for thy possession</i>. Thou shalt break 
them with a rod of iron; thou shalt dash them in pieces like a potter’s vessel. 
Be wise now, therefore, O ye kings; be instructed, ye judges of the earth. Serve 
the Lord with fear, and rejoice with trembling. <i>Kiss the Son</i>, lest he be 
angry, and ye perish from the way, when his wrath is kindled but a little. <i>Blessed 
are all they that put their trust in him</i>.”<note n="384" id="iv.ii-p221.2"><p class="normal" id="iv.ii-p222">This is an incontestible proof 
that the Son is God, even <span class="sc" id="iv.ii-p222.1">Jehovah</span> The Psalmist often says, 
“Blessed are they, blessed is the man who trusteth in the Lord.” And here he says, 
Blessed are all they who trust in the Son of God. And yet forbids us to put our 
trust in any but God. “Put not your trust in princes, or in the son of man, in whom 
there is no help. Happy is he that hath the God of Jacob for his help, whose hope 
is in the Lord his God.” [<scripRef id="iv.ii-p222.2" passage="Psalm cxlvi. 3" parsed="|Ps|146|3|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Ps.146.3">Psalm cxlvi. 3</scripRef>, <scripRef passage="Psalm 146:5" id="iv.ii-p222.3" parsed="|Ps|146|5|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Ps.146.5">5</scripRef>.] And he says, “My soul, wait thou only 
upon God; for my expectation is from him.” [<scripRef id="iv.ii-p222.4" passage="Psalm lxii. 5" parsed="|Ps|62|5|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Ps.62.5">Psalm lxii. 5</scripRef>.] They only are blessed, 
who trust in God; and all others are cursed. “Thus saith the Lord, Cursed be the 
man that trusteth in man. Blessed is the man that trusteth in the Lord, and whose 
hope the Lord is.” [<scripRef id="iv.ii-p222.5" passage="Jer. xvii. 5" parsed="|Jer|17|5|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Jer.17.5">Jer. xvii. 5</scripRef>, <scripRef passage="Jer 17:7" id="iv.ii-p222.6" parsed="|Jer|17|7|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Jer.17.7">7</scripRef>.] They are blessed, who trust in the Son of 
God. Therefore he is the Lord.</p></note> From this ancient oracle in Israel, and from 
a revelation which was made upon the first apostasy, and handed down by tradition, 
not only the Jews, but also those of other nations who had any particular connexion 
with them, were taught to consider <pb n="368" id="iv.ii-Page_368" />the expected Messiah as the Son 
of God in a peculiar and appropriated sense; and as implying real divinity. Therefore, 
it was supposed on all hands, that this person, the Son of God, the King of Israel, 
the King of the Jews, was to be worshipped as worthy to receive divine honours. 
Hence the wise men from the East, being admonished of the birth of this glorious 
personage, came to <span class="sc" id="iv.ii-p222.7">worship</span> him, to pay him divine honours; 
for which they had a particular warrant, having had him pointed out to them by a
<span class="sc" id="iv.ii-p222.8">star</span>, which was a known symbol, or hieroglyphic of the Divinity, 
or a God. And Herod took it for granted, that this person was to be worshipped, 
and receive divine honours. For he said to the wise men, “When ye have found 
him, bring me word again, that I may come <i>and worship him also</i>.”</p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.ii-p223">All this will be of no weight, indeed, and as nothing with the 
Anti-trinitarians, the Sebellians; and with all those who deny the divinity of Jesus 
Christ, the Arians and Socinians. But they who believe in a Trinity of persons in 
the Deity, and that Jesus Christ is God, the second person of the Trinity, must 
be sensible that he is called the Son of God, the Son of the Father, with a special 
reference to his divine nature, and to denote his Godhead, as the second person 
in the Triune God.—The Arians and Socinians hold that he is the Son of God, considered 
as a mere creature, being by this distinguished from all other creatures; and consequently 
that there was no Son of God before this creature did exist. The latter, or Trinitarians, 
believe that the Sonship of Jesus Christ, necessarily includes his divinity; but 
are not all agreed as to the foundation of his Sonship, and in what it consists. 
It has been generally believed, and the common doctrine of the church of Christ, 
from the beginning of the fourth century, and so far as appears from the days of 
the apostles to this time, that Jesus Christ is the <i>eternal</i> Son of God: That 
his Sonship is essential to him, as the second person in the Trinity, and that
<i>in this sense</i> he is <i>the only begotten Son of the Father</i>, antecedent 
to his incarnation, and independent on it, even from eternity. But there are some 
who think that the Sonship of the Redeemer consists in an <pb n="369" id="iv.ii-Page_369" />union of 
the second person of the Trinity, or the Word, with the human nature; and that lie 
became the Son of God by becoming man; and therefore before the incarnation, there 
was no Son of God, though there were a Trinity of persons in the
<span class="sc" id="iv.ii-p223.1">Godhead</span>. This opinion seems to be rather gaining ground, 
and spreading, of late.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.ii-p224">Those on each side of this question differ in their opinion of 
the importance of it, and of the bad tendency of either of these opposite sentiments. 
Some suppose that the difference is of little or no importance, as both believe 
the Redeemer to be God and man, in one person, and that he is the Son of God, and 
that this implies his divinity, though they differ in opinion respecting the time 
and manner of his filiation. Others think this is a difference so great and important, 
and attended with such consequences; and that those who are opposed to them on this 
point embrace such a great and dangerous error, that they ought to be strenuously 
opposed: and consequently do not desire an accommodation, or think it possible.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.ii-p225">Though it be needless and improper here to undertake the labour 
of entering into all the arguments which have been produced, or may be mentioned 
in support of each side of this question; yet the following observations may not 
be altogether useless; but may be of some help to form a judgment upon this point, 
agreeable to the scriptures.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.ii-p226">1. As this question respects the character of the Redeemer, it 
may justly be considered as an important one; as every thing relating to his character 
is very important and interesting. Who would be willing to be found at last taking 
the wrong side of this question; and always to have entertained so unbecoming ideas 
and conceptions of the Redeemer, which his must be, if on this point he embraces 
and contends for that which is directly contrary to the truth? Though such an error 
should not be fatal to him who embraces it, but be consistent with his being a real 
christian; yet it must be a very criminal mistake, and dishonourable to Jesus Christ; 
as every idea of him must be, which is contrary to his true character: For that 
is so perfect and glorious, <pb n="370" id="iv.ii-Page_370" />that nothing can be taken from it, or 
added to it, which will not mar and dishonour it. His character, as it respects 
the question before us, is without doubt properly and clearly stated in divine revelation, 
and if we embrace that which is contrary to the truth, it must be wholly our own 
fault, and a very criminal abuse of the advantages which we enjoy, to know the only 
true God, and Jesus Christ his Son, whom he has sent. Those considerations ought 
to awaken our attention to this subject, and excite a concern and earnest desire 
to know and embrace the truth; which will be attended with a modest, humble, diligent 
inquiry, sensible of the danger in which we are, through prejudice, or from other 
causes, of embracing error; and earnestly looking to the great Prophet to lead us 
into the truth.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.ii-p227">2. What has been observed above, and, it is believed, made evident, 
viz. that the term, Son of God, so often given to Christ, is used to denote his 
divine nature, and to express his divinity, rather than his humanity, seems naturally, 
if not necessarily, to lead us to consider this character as belonging to him independent 
of his union to the human nature, and antecedent to his becoming man; and therefore, 
that it belongs to him as God, the second person in the Trinity. For if his Sonship 
consists in his union to the human nature, and he became a son, only by becoming 
a man; then this character depends wholly upon this union, and is derived from his 
being made flesh: Therefore this epithet could not be properly used to denote his 
divinity, independent of his humanity, or what he is as a divine person, antecedent 
to his incarnation; or to express his divine, rather than his human nature. And 
Son of God, would be no higher a character, and express no more than Son of man; 
which is contrary to the idea which the scripture gives us on this head, as has 
been shown.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.ii-p228">This may, perhaps, be in some measure illustrated by the following 
instance. The son of a nobleman of the first honour and dignity, came from Europe, 
and married the daughter of a plebeian in America, by which he became his son: But 
as his honour and dignity did not consist in his marrying this woman, or in <pb n="371" id="iv.ii-Page_371" />
his being the son of the plebeian, by this union with his daughter, but in his original 
character; no man thought of expressing his highest and most dignified character 
by which he was worthy of the greatest respect, by using an epithet which denoted 
only his union to that woman, and which was not applicable to him in any other view; 
or by calling him <i>son</i>, as expressing this new relation: But the highest title 
which they gave him, was that which had a special respect to, and expressed his 
original character, which he sustained antecedent to this union; and in which his 
highest dignity consisted. And he being the son of a nobleman and a lord, in which 
all his honour and dignity did consist, they used this phrase, My noble Lord, to 
express their highest respect, and his most worthy character. This epithet was always 
used to express his original and highest character and relation, and could not, 
with propriety, be used to express any thing else. He was often called, indeed, 
the son of the plebeian, when they designed particularly to express his union to 
his wife, and speak of him as standing in this relation.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.ii-p229">3. The Son of God is spoken of in many instances, if not in every 
one where this term is used, so as will naturally lead the reader to consider him 
as sustaining this character and relation antecedent to his incarnation, and independent 
of it. “God so loved the world <i>that he gave his only begotten Son</i>.”<note n="385" id="iv.ii-p229.1"><p class="normal" id="iv.ii-p230">
<scripRef id="iv.ii-p230.1" passage="John iii. 16" parsed="|John|3|16|0|0" osisRef="Bible:John.3.16">John iii. 16</scripRef>.</p></note> Do not these words seem to express this idea, viz. that there 
existed an only begotten son, antecedent to his being given; that God gave this 
his Son to the world by his becoming flesh, and being united to the human nature; 
and not that he became his Son by this union? “In this was manifested the love of 
God towards us, because that God <i>sent his only begotten Son into the world</i>, 
that we might live through him. Herein is love, not that we loved God, but that 
he loved us, <i>and sent his Son</i> to be a propitiation for our sins.”<note n="386" id="iv.ii-p230.2"><p class="normal" id="iv.ii-p231"><scripRef id="iv.ii-p231.1" passage="1 John iv. 9" parsed="|1John|4|9|0|0" osisRef="Bible:1John.4.9">1 
John iv. 9</scripRef>, <scripRef passage="1 John 4:10" id="iv.ii-p231.2" parsed="|1John|4|10|0|0" osisRef="Bible:1John.4.10">10</scripRef>.</p></note> If God <i>sent</i> his only begotten Son into the world, 
does not this suppose he had a Son to send, antecedent to his sending him; and that 
he did not become his Son by his sending him into the world, or only in consequence 
of this? This is expressed in the <pb n="372" id="iv.ii-Page_372" />same manner by St. Paul. “But when 
the fulness of time was come God sent forth his Son, made of a woman, made under 
the law.”<note n="387" id="iv.ii-p231.3"><p class="normal" id="iv.ii-p232"><scripRef id="iv.ii-p232.1" passage="Gal. iv. 4" parsed="|Gal|4|4|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Gal.4.4">Gal. iv. 4</scripRef>.</p></note> The Son was <i>sent forth</i>. Does not this 
seem at least to imply that there was a Son to be sent forth antecedent to his being 
made of a woman, and that he was not made a Son, by being made of a woman, or becoming 
man? “No man hath seen God at any time: <i>The only begotten Son, which is in the 
bosom of the Father</i>, he hath declared him.”<note n="388" id="iv.ii-p232.2"><p class="normal" id="iv.ii-p233"><scripRef id="iv.ii-p233.1" passage="John i. 18" parsed="|John|1|18|0|0" osisRef="Bible:John.1.18">John i. 18</scripRef>.</p></note> 
Do not these words naturally lead us to conceive of the only begotten Son as existing 
in the nearest union with the Father as his Son, independent of the human nature?
</p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.ii-p234">It is said, “God <i>was manifested in the flesh</i>.”<note n="389" id="iv.ii-p234.1"><p class="normal" id="iv.ii-p235"><scripRef id="iv.ii-p235.1" passage="1 Tim. iii. 26" parsed="|1Tim|3|26|0|0" osisRef="Bible:1Tim.3.26">1 
Tim. iii. 26</scripRef>.</p></note> It would be unnatural and absurd to suppose, from this &amp;gt; expression, 
that Jesus Christ was not God, antecedent to his being manifested in the flesh, 
and that by his becoming man, he became a God. Directly the contrary to this is 
asserted, viz. that he who is God from eternity, did in time appear in the human 
nature, and manifested himself to be God, independent of the flesh, in which he 
appeared. It is also said, “For this purpose, the Son of God was manifested, that 
he might destroy the works of the devil.”<note n="390" id="iv.ii-p235.2"><p class="normal" id="iv.ii-p236"><scripRef id="iv.ii-p236.1" passage="1 John iii. 8" parsed="|1John|3|8|0|0" osisRef="Bible:1John.3.8">1 John iii. 8</scripRef>.</p></note> These two 
passages appear to be parallel. God manifested in the flesh, and the Son of God 
manifested, are two expressions of the same thing. From this it may be inferred, 
that the Son of God, and God, are synonymous here, and of the same import. This 
serves to confirm what has been said above of the use and meaning of the term, Son 
of God. And may it not with equal certainty be inferred from these two passages, 
compared together, that the Son of God existed in this character as the Son of God, 
antecedent to his manifestation in the flesh, and independent of it; and that he 
did not become the Son of God by being made flesh? If God be manifested in the flesh, 
there must be a God to be manifested antecedent to such manifestation, and independent 
of it. And is it not equally certain that if the Son of God be manifested, he must 
have existed the Son of God, antecedent to such manifestation, and independent of 
it? Consequently he did not become the Son of God by his being <pb n="373" id="iv.ii-Page_373" />manifested 
.in the flesh: His Sonship does not consist in the union of the divine and human 
natures in one person. His personality existed before this union with the human 
nature; and he was the Son of God before this: This same Son of God, this same person 
who existed without beginning, assumed the human nature, not a human person, into 
a union with himself, his own person, and so appeared, was manifested in the flesh. 
♦</p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.ii-p237">When David speaks of the Son of God, and represents the Father 
as saying, “Thou art my Son, this day have I begotten thee,” so long before his 
incarnation, the idea which most naturally arises in the mind from this is, that 
there was then such a person as the Son, who did at that time declare the decree, 
by the mouth of David; and not, that there should in some future time be a Son begotten, 
who should <i>then</i> declare the decree. “I will declare the decree: The Lord 
said unto me, thou art my son, this day have I begotten thee.” It is very unnatural, 
and contrary to all propriety of speech to suppose, “this day have I begotten thee,” 
means I will beget thee in some future time; and that the Son should be made to 
declare the decree, long before any such person existed; and when there was in fact 
no such Son. The decree which the Son declares is not that declaration, “Thou art 
my son, this day have I begotten thee;” but what follows, “ask of me, and I will 
give thee the heathen for thine inheritance, and the uttermost parts of the earth 
for thy possession. Thou shalt break them with a rod of iron, &amp;:c.” “<i>This day</i>,” 
that is, <i>now</i>, not in time which is passed, or which is to come; for with 
God there is no succession, no time passed or to come; but he exists, as we may 
say, in one eternal, unsuccessive <span class="sc" id="iv.ii-p237.1">now</span>. Therefore, when he 
speaks of an eternal, immanent act, it is most properly expressed thus, “This day, 
or <span class="sc" id="iv.ii-p237.2">now</span>, have I begotten thee.” This therefore is the sense 
in which the best divines have generally understood it.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.ii-p238">St. Paul cites this passage as being illustrated and verified 
in the resurrection of Jesus Christ.<note n="391" id="iv.ii-p238.1"><p class="normal" id="iv.ii-p239"><scripRef id="iv.ii-p239.1" passage="Acts xiii. 33" parsed="|Acts|13|33|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Acts.13.33">Acts xiii. 33</scripRef>.</p></note> But he cannot mean 
that he by the resurrection became the Son of God, and was then begotten: for he 
had this title <pb n="374" id="iv.ii-Page_374" />before that. His meaning is explained by himself in 
his epistle to the Romans. “<i>Declared</i> lo be the Son of God, by the resurrection 
from the dead.”<note n="392" id="iv.ii-p239.2"><p class="normal" id="iv.ii-p240"><scripRef id="iv.ii-p240.1" passage="Rom. i. 4" parsed="|Rom|1|4|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Rom.1.4">Rom. i. 4</scripRef>.</p></note> That is, this was a fresh and open manifestation 
and declaration that he was indeed what had been often asserted of him, and what 
he always was: The only begotten Son of God.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.ii-p241">What the angel said to the virgin Mary, “He shall be great, and 
shall be called the Son of the highest—The Holy Ghost shall come upon thee, and 
the power of the highest shall overshadow thee: Therefore also that holy thing which 
shall be born of thee, shall be called the Son of God,” cannot reasonably be understood 
as a declaration that his sonship consisted in his miraculous conception, or in 
the union of the second person of the Trinity with the human nature, thus conceived: 
But that this child, conceived in this manner, and born of a virgin, should appear, 
and be known to be the Son of God, that very person who had been spoken of and known 
in all past ages by this title; of whom Isaiah had particularly spoken, when he 
said, “Behold, a virgin shall conceive, and bear a Son, and shall call his name
<span class="sc" id="iv.ii-p241.1">Immanuel</span>. Unto us a Son is given, and the government shall 
be upon his shoulder: And his name shall be called, Wonderful, Counsellor, the mighty 
God:”<note n="393" id="iv.ii-p241.2"><p class="normal" id="iv.ii-p242"><scripRef id="iv.ii-p242.1" passage="Isaiah vii. 14" parsed="|Isa|7|14|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Isa.7.14">Isaiah vii. 14</scripRef>. <scripRef passage="Isa 9:6" id="iv.ii-p242.2" parsed="|Isa|9|6|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Isa.9.6">ix. 6</scripRef>.</p></note> 
That this Son was now to be born of the virgin Mary: The long expected Messiah, 
who is considered and spoken of by the people of God, by the title of the Son of 
God, which title he shall bear, as he is indeed the mighty God.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.ii-p243">We are naturally lead to consider the Son of God as existing in 
this character before his incarnation, and the same with the Word, by what is said 
of him in the first chapter of John. “The Word was made flesh, and dwelt among us; 
and we beheld his glory as of the only begotten of the Father. No man hath seen 
God at any time. The only begotten Son, which is in the bosom of the Father, he 
hath declared him. John bare witness of him, and cried, saying, this was he of whom 
I spake, he that cometh after me, is preferred before me: <i>For he was before me</i>. 
And I saw, and bear <pb n="375" id="iv.ii-Page_375" />record that this is the Son of God.” Here John 
is represented as asserting that the Son of God, concerning whom he bore witness, 
did exist <i>before him</i>, which therefore must be <i>before his incarnation</i>; 
for John was conceived before the incarnation of Jesus. But how can this be true, 
if there were no Son of God, before John existed? But if we consider the Word and 
the Son of God as synonymous, who was in the beginning with God, and who was God, 
and created all things, this whole chapter will be plain and easy to be understood; 
and we shall see John bearing witness to the Son of God, who existed before him 
in this character, and was now come in the flesh.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.ii-p244">We find the same representation made in the epistle to the Hebrews. 
“God, who spake in time past unto the fathers, by the prophets, hath in these last 
days spoken unto us by his Son, whom he hath appointed heir of all things; <i>by 
whom also he made the worlds</i>. Who being the brightness of his glory, and the 
express image of his person, <i>and upholding all things by the word of his power</i>,” 
&amp;c. How could God make the worlds <i>by his Son</i>, four thousand years before 
he had a Son; and on this supposition, where is the propriety or truth of this assertion? 
And how could the Son be said to uphold all things by the word of his power, thousands 
of years before any Son existed? “And again, <i>when he bringeth the first begotten 
into the world</i>, he saith, And let all the angels of God worship him.” This expression 
naturally suggests the idea that God the Father had a first begotten Son to bring 
into the world, whom he commanded the angels to worship. How can he be said to
<i>bring</i> his first begotten Son <i>into the world</i>, when he had no such Son 
to bring into the world; and indeed never did bring this his Son into the world, 
if he was begotten, and received his sonship <i>in this world</i>, when he took 
the human nature in the womb of the virgin, and was not a son before?</p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.ii-p245">Again, speaking of Melchisedec, he says, he was “Without father, 
without mother, without descent, <i>having neither beginning of days</i>, nor end 
of life; <i>but made like unto the Son of God</i>.”<note n="394" id="iv.ii-p245.1"><p class="normal" id="iv.ii-p246"><scripRef id="iv.ii-p246.1" passage="Heb. vii. 3" parsed="|Heb|7|3|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Heb.7.3">Heb. vii. 3</scripRef>.</p></note> If 
there were no Son <pb n="376" id="iv.ii-Page_376" />
of God till the human nature of Christ existed, then the Son of God did <i>begin 
to exist</i>; consequently there was a beginning of his days; and Melchisedec was 
not made like him, but <i>unlike</i> to him, by having no beginning of days.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.ii-p247">Since there are so many passages of scripture, (and there are 
many more than have now been mentioned) which seem to represent the Redeemer as 
the Son of God, antecedent to his incarnation, and independent of it, which will 
naturally lead those who attend to them to this idea of him; and some of them cannot 
be easily reconciled to the contrary opinion; this will fully account for the generally 
received doctrine in the christian world from the earliest ages to this time, viz. 
That the Redeemer of man is the second person in the Trinity, the eternal Son of 
God, who in the fulness of time was made flesh, by a personal union with the human 
nature.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.ii-p248">4. It is worthy of consideration, whether the contrary opinion, 
viz. That the Redeemer is the Son of God, only by the second person in the Trinity 
being united to human nature, and becoming man, does not naturally lead to dangerous 
and evil consequences; and what good end is to be answered by it? If it be not agreeable 
to scripture, we know it must be dangerous and hurtful in a greater or less degree, 
(as all errors respecting the person and character of the Redeemer are) and naturally 
tends to lead into other mistakes, still greater, and of worse consequence. And 
if it be agreeable to scripture, it certainly has no bad tendency. If, therefore, 
it does appear from reasoning upon it, or from fact and experience, that this opinion 
tends to evil consequences, and has a bad effect; we may safely conclude that it 
is wrong, and contrary to divine revelation.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.ii-p249">1. Does not this sentiment tend to lower our ideas of the Redeemer, 
and lead into a way of thinking less honourably of him? It has been observed that 
it appears from scripture, that this title, Son of God, was used to express the 
highest and most honourable idea which his friends had of his person and character. 
But if we understand by it, nothing but what takes place by his union <pb n="377" id="iv.ii-Page_377" />
to man, by taking flesh upon him, and consider it as signifying nothing but what 
took place by his becoming man, nothing is expressed by it more than by <i>Son of 
man</i>: And we are left without any epithet or common scripture phrase, whereby 
to express the divinity, the Godhead of the Redeemer, and his equality with the 
Father. Thus, instead of raising our conceptions of the Redeemer, does it not tend 
to sink them? Does not the sonship of Christ become an infinitely less and more 
inconsiderable matter, upon this plan, than that which has always been esteemed 
the orthodox sentiment on this point, which considers his sonship, as wholly independent 
of the whole creation, as eternal, and altogether divine?</p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.ii-p250">We live in an age when the enemies of the Redeemer lift up their 
heads, and are suffered to multiply and prevail. The deists attempt to cast him 
out as an imposter. Arians and Socinians strip him of his divinity: And the careless, 
ignorant, immoral and profane, treat him with contempt or neglect. This is agreeable 
to his great enemy, Satan; who seems now to be let loose in an unusual degree, and 
has uncommon power among men, to lead them into gross errors, and those especially 
which are dishonourable to Christ, and injurious to his character. And if this sentiment 
now under consideration, concerning the sonship of the Redeemer, should spread and 
prevail <i>now</i>, this would be no evidence in favour of it; but, considering 
what has been now observed, concerning it, would it not give reason to suspect, 
at least, that it is dishonourable to the Son of God, and leads to other errors 
yet more dishonourable to him?</p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.ii-p251">This leads to observe,</p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.ii-p252">2. It is worthy of consideration, whether this doctrine of the 
filiation of Jesus Christ, does not tend to reject the doctrine of the Trinity, 
as it has been held by those who have been called the orthodox in the christian 
church, and leads to what is called Sabellianism; which considers the Deity as but 
one person, and to be three only out of respect to the different manner or kind 
of his operations.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.ii-p253">This notion of the sonship of Christ, leads to suppose that the 
Deity is the Father of the Mediator, without <pb n="378" id="iv.ii-Page_378" />distinction of persons; 
and that by Father so often mentioned in the New Testament, and generally in relation 
to the Son, is commonly, if not always, meant Deity, without distinction of persons. 
If this be so, it tends to exclude all distinction of persons in God, and to make 
the personality of the Redeemer to consist wholly in the human nature; and finally, 
to make his union with Deity no more, but the same which Arians and Socinians admit, 
viz. the same which takes place between God and good men in general; but in a higher 
and peculiar degree.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.ii-p254">But if there be no tendency in this doctrine of the sonship of 
Christ, to the consequences which have been now mentioned; and it can be made evident 
that none of those supposed evils do attend it, or can follow from it; yet it remains 
to be considered <i>what advantage attends it</i>, and the good ends it will answer, 
if it were admitted to be true. None will say, it is presumed, that it is more agreeable 
to the general expressions of scripture relating to this point, than the opposite 
doctrine; who well considers what has been observed above. The most that any one 
can with justice say with respect to this is, that the scripture may be so construed 
and understood, as to be consistent with the sonship of Christ, commencing at the 
incarnation, however inconsistent with it some passages may appear at first view.
</p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.ii-p255">It may be thought, perhaps, that this notion of the sonship of 
the Redeemer is attended with two advantages, if not with more, viz. It frees the 
doctrine of the Trinity from that which is perfectly incomprehensible, and appears 
a real contradiction and absurdity; that the second person should be Son of the 
first, who is the Father; the Son being begotten by the Father from eternity; than 
which nothing can be more inconceivable, and seemingly absurd. And this appears 
inconsistent with the second person being equal with the first; for a son begotten 
of a father, implies inferiority, and that he exists after his father, and consequently 
begins to exist, and is dependent. Both these difficulties are wholly avoided, it 
is thought, by supposing that the second person in the Trinity became a son by being 
united to the human nature, and begotten in the womb of the virgin. <pb n="379" id="iv.ii-Page_379" />
And it is probable that these supposed advantages have recommended this scheme of 
the sonship of Christ, to those who embrace it, and led them to reject the commonly 
received opinion; and not a previous conviction that the former is most agreeable 
to the scripture. This therefore demands our serious and candid attention. And the 
following things may be observed upon it.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.ii-p256">1. If we exclude every thing from our creed, concerning God, his 
existence, and the manner of his existence, which to us is incomprehensible and 
unaccountable, we must reject the doctrine of the Trinity in unity, and even of 
the existence of a God. The doctrine of three persons in one God is wholly inconceivable 
by us, and Unitarians consider it as the greatest contradiction and absurdity imaginable. 
And those Trinitarians, who have undertaken to explain it, and make it more intelligible, 
have generally failed of giving any light; but have really made it absurd and even 
ridiculous, by “darkening counsel by words without knowledge.” If we reasoned properly 
on the matter, we should expect to find in a revelation which God has made of himself, 
his being and manner of subsistence, mysteries which we can by no means understand, 
which are to creatures wonderful, and wholly unaccountable. For the being of God, 
and the manner of his existence, and of his subsisting, must be infinitely above 
our comprehension: God is infinitely great, and we know him not. And if we attempt 
to search out these mysteries by reason, we are prone to think they are contradictions 
and absurdities, merely because our reason cannot fathom them; and they appear more 
unintelligible, the more we try to understand them. “Canst thou by searching find 
out God? Canst thou find out the <span class="sc" id="iv.ii-p256.1">Almighty</span> to perfection? 
It is as high as heaven, what canst thou do? Deeper than hell, what canst thou know? 
The measure thereof is longer than the earth, and broader than the sea.”<note n="395" id="iv.ii-p256.2"><p class="normal" id="iv.ii-p257"><scripRef id="iv.ii-p257.1" passage="Job ii. 7" parsed="|Job|2|7|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Job.2.7">Job 
ii. 7</scripRef>, <scripRef passage="Job 2:8" id="iv.ii-p257.2" parsed="|Job|2|8|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Job.2.8">8</scripRef>, <scripRef passage="Job 2:9" id="iv.ii-p257.3" parsed="|Job|2|9|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Job.2.9">9</scripRef>.</p></note> “Teach us what we shall say unto him, (and what we shall say 
concerning him;) for we cannot order our speech by reason of darkness. Shall it 
be told him that <i>I speak</i>?” and attempt to comprehend and explain the mysteries 
that relate to his existence? “If a man speaks 
<pb n="380" id="iv.ii-Page_380" />surely he shall be swallowed up.”<note n="396" id="iv.ii-p257.4"><p class="normal" id="iv.ii-p258"><scripRef id="iv.ii-p258.1" passage="Job xxxvii. 19" parsed="|Job|37|19|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Job.37.19">Job xxxvii. 19</scripRef>, <scripRef passage="Job 37:20" id="iv.ii-p258.2" parsed="|Job|37|20|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Job.37.20">20</scripRef>.</p></note> 
If a man undertake thus to speak, instead of giving any light, he will be involved 
and overwhelmed in impenetrable darkness.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.ii-p259">They, therefore, who do not believe the eternal sonship of Jesus 
Christ, because it is mysterious and incomprehensible, and to some it appears to 
be full of contradiction, will, if they be consistent with themselves, for the same 
reason, reject the doctrine of a Trinity of persons in one God.<note n="397" id="iv.ii-p259.1"><p class="normal" id="iv.ii-p260">It has been 
observed, p. 377, that the denial of the eternal sonship of Christ seemed to have 
a tendency to a rejection of the doctrine of the Trinity; and in what way. But what 
is here observed, shews how the denial of the former tends, <i>another way</i>, 
to the rejection of the latter. For if the former be rejected, because it is incomprehensible, 
and appears inconsistent, it may be expected that when the doctrine of the Trinity 
is more particularly considered, it will appear equally unintelligible; and therefore 
be rejected, for the same reason. Is it not probable, that Sabellius, the ancient 
Antitrinitarian, was in this way led to give up the doctrine of the Trinity?</p></note></p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.ii-p261">2. If the doctrine of the eternal generation and sonship of the 
second person in the Trinity be soberly and modestly considered in the light of 
the foregoing observation, and with a proper sense of our own darkness and infinite 
inferiority to the divine Being, and how little we can know of him; we shall not 
be forward to pronounce it inconsistent with reason, and absurd; but be convinced, 
that to do thus, is very bold and assuming; and that it may be consistent and true, 
notwithstanding any thing we may know; though it be mysterious and incomprehensible. 
This is a <i>divine generation</i>, infinitely above any thing that takes place 
among creatures, and infinitely different. It is that of which we can have no adequate 
idea, and is infinitely out of our reach. What incompetent judges are we then of 
this matter? What right or ability have we to pronounce it absurd or inconsistent, 
when we have no capacity to know or determine what is true, consistent, or inconsistent 
in this high point, any farther than God has been pleased to reveal it to us? There 
may be innumerable mysteries in the existence and manner of subsistence of the infinite 
Being, which are, and must be, incomprehensible, by a finite understanding. God 
has been pleased, for wise ends, to reveal that of the Trinity, and this of the 
eternal generation <pb n="381" id="iv.ii-Page_381" />and sonship of the second person: And he has done 
it in a manner, and in words best suited to convey those ideas of it to men, which 
it is necessary they should have: And we ought to receive it with meekness and implicit 
submission, using our reason in excluding every thing which is contrary to, or below 
infinite perfection, and absolute independence; without pretending to comprehend 
it, or to be able to judge of that which is infinitely high and divine, by that 
which takes place among creatures, with respect to generation, and father and son.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.ii-p262">God is said in scripture, to repent and be grieved at his heart; 
to be angry, and to have his fury to come up in his face; and hands, feet, eyes, 
mouth, lips and tongue, &amp;c. are ascribed to him. These words are designed and suited 
to convey useful ideas, and important instruction to men. But if we should understand 
these expressions as meaning the same thing in the Divine Being, that they do when 
applied to men; we must entertain very unworthy, and most absurd notions of God, 
and wholly inconsistent with other declarations in the sacred Oracles. But if we 
exclude every thing that is human, or that implies any change or imperfection from 
these expressions when applied to the Deity, they will convey nothing absurd or 
inconsistent, or that is unworthy of God. And it will doubtless be equally so in 
the case before us; if it be constantly kept in mind that the only begotten Son 
of God denotes nothing human, but is infinitely above any thing which relates to 
natural, or creature generation, and does not include any beginning, change, dependence, 
inferiority, or imperfection. This will effectually exclude all real absurdity and 
contradiction.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.ii-p263">It will be asked, perhaps, when all this is excluded from our 
ideas of generation, of Father and Son, what idea will remain in our minds, which 
is conveyed by these words? Will they not be without any signification to us, and 
altogether useless? To this, the following answer may be given: From what is revealed 
concerning this high and incomprehensible mystery, we learn, that in the existence 
of the Deity, there is that which is high above our thoughts, as the heavens are 
above the <pb n="382" id="iv.ii-Page_382" />earth, infinitely beyond our conception, and different from 
any thing which takes place among creatures, which is a foundation of a personal 
distinction, as real and great as that between father and son among men, and infinitely 
more perfect: Which distinction may be in the best manner conveyed to us by Father 
and Son, to express the most perfect union and equality; that the Son is the brightness 
of the Father’s glory, and the express image of his person, and that there is infinite 
love and endearment between them; and that in the economy of the work of redemption, 
the Son is obedient to the Father, Sec. All this, and much more, our minds are capable 
of conceiving from what is revealed on this high and important subject; which is 
suited to impress our hearts with a sense of the incomprehensible, infinite, adorable 
perfection and glory of the Father and the Son; and is necessary in order to give 
us a right understanding of the gospel; of the true character of the Redeemer, and 
of the work of redemption.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.ii-p264">What has been now said under this second particular, may serve 
to remove the other supposed difficulty in admitting the eternal filiation of the 
second person in the Trinity, viz. that it represents the Son as inferior to the 
Father, and as existing <i>after him</i>, and therefore his existence had a beginning. 
This is obviated by the above observations; and particularly by this, that it is 
a <i>divine filiation</i>, and therefore infinitely unlike that which is human; 
and above our comprehension. Besides, to suppose eternal generation admits of <i>
before</i> or <i>after</i>, or of a beginning, is inconsistent. It may be further 
observed,</p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.ii-p265">3. That the opinion that Jesus Christ is the first and only begotten 
Son of God, by the second person in the Trinity becoming incarnate, and united to 
the human nature, is, perhaps, attended with as great difficulties as the other 
which has been considered, if not greater. If so, the inducement to embrace it, 
and reject the other, which we are examining, wholly ceases.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.ii-p266">If the Son was begotten by the miraculous formation of the human 
nature; then the Holy Ghost begot the Son and is the Father, as much as the first 
person in the Trinity. For the angel said to the virgin, “The Holy Ghost shall come 
upon thee, and the power of the Highest <pb n="383" id="iv.ii-Page_383" />shall overshadow thee: Therefore 
also that holy thing which shall be born of thee, shall be called the Son of God.” 
If we take these words as referring only to the production of the human nature, 
and if it be granted that by die highest, is meant the first person in the Trinity, 
of which there does not appear to be any evidence, yet the third person, the Holy 
Ghost, is represented as doing as much, and being as active in this production as 
the first person. But if this were no difficulty, and the first person of the Trinity 
be supposed to produce the human nature, and in this sense to be the Father of Jesus 
Christ; yet this will make him his Father in no other and higher sense than he is 
the Father of angels, and of Adam; and Jesus Christ will be the Son of God in no 
other, or higher sense than they; for they were created and formed in an extraordinary, 
miraculous way.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.ii-p267">If the Son was begotten by uniting the second person of the Trinity 
with the human nature, and the filiation of the Son is supposed to consist wholly 
in being thus united to man; this is attended with the following difficulties, as 
great, perhaps, if not greater, than those which attend the eternal Sonship of the 
second person.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.ii-p268">1. This is as different in nature and kind from natural or creature 
generation, as eternal divine generation; and the one bears no analogy or likeness 
to the other.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.ii-p269">2. This union of God with the creature so as to become one person, 
is as mysterious and incomprehensible, as the eternal Sonship of the second person 
of the Trinity; and as inexplicable: So that nothing is gained with respect to this, 
by embracing this scheme.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.ii-p270">3. It is not agreeable to scripture to suppose that the first 
person of the Trinity only, united the second person to the human nature, and so 
became a Father by thus begetting a Son. The third person, the Holy Ghost, is represented 
as doing this, or at least, being active in it; and there is nothing expressly said 
of the first person doing any thing respecting it as such. “The Holy Ghost shall 
come upon thee, and the power of the Highest shall overshadow thee: Therefore also, 
that holy thing which shall be born of thee, shall be called the Son of God.” “Now 
the birth of Jesus <pb n="384" id="iv.ii-Page_384" />Christ was on this wise. When his mother, Mary, 
was espoused to Joseph, before they came together, <i>she was found with child of 
the Holy Ghost</i>.” And the angel of the Lord said unto Joseph, “Fear not 
to take unto thee Mary thy wife: <i>For that which is conceived in her, is of the 
Holy Ghost</i>.”<note n="398" id="iv.ii-p270.1"><p class="normal" id="iv.ii-p271"><scripRef id="iv.ii-p271.1" passage="Matt. i. 18" parsed="|Matt|1|18|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Matt.1.18">Matt. i. 18</scripRef>, <scripRef passage="Matt 1:20" id="iv.ii-p271.2" parsed="|Matt|1|20|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Matt.1.20">20</scripRef>.</p></note> And this uniting the divine nature 
with the human, is expressly ascribed, not to the first, but to the second person. 
“For as much as the children are partakers of flesh and blood, he also himself took 
part of the same. For verily <i>he took not on him</i> the nature of angels; <i>
but he took on him the seed of Abraham</i>.”<note n="399" id="iv.ii-p271.3"><p class="normal" id="iv.ii-p272"><scripRef id="iv.ii-p272.1" passage="Heb. ii. 14" parsed="|Heb|2|14|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Heb.2.14">Heb. ii. 14</scripRef>, <scripRef passage="Heb 2:16" id="iv.ii-p272.2" parsed="|Heb|2|16|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Heb.2.16">16</scripRef>.</p></note> Do not 
they speak not only <i>without scripture</i>, but <i>contrary to it</i>, who say 
that the first person of the Trinity became a Father by uniting the second person 
to the human nature, in the womb of the virgin Mary; by which the latter became 
the only begotten Son of the Father? That the relation of Father and Son began in 
the incarnation of Christ, and consists wholly in this? And do they by this supposition 
avoid any difficulty, and render the filiation of the Redeemer more consistent, 
intelligible, or honourable to him? Let the thoughtful, candid, discerning reader 
judge.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.ii-p273">IV. <span class="sc" id="iv.ii-p273.1">The</span> Redeemer of man, who is God-man, 
the Son of God, sustains the character of Mediator between God and man. That such 
a person only is equal to this, to mediate between God and rebellious man, so as 
to effect a reconciliation, will be made evident when we proceed more particularly 
to consider the work of redemption, what is implied in it, and what was necessary 
in order to effect it. And it will also appear that he is every way qualified to 
sustain such an office and station, and in the best manner complete the arduous, 
the glorious work; and the character of this infinitely high, important, and wonderful 
personage will be more fully investigated and displayed in the sequel.</p>
<h2 id="iv.ii-p273.2">IMPROVEMENT.</h2>
<p class="normal" id="iv.ii-p274">1. By attending as above, to the person and character of the Redeemer, 
we are in some measure prepared to see the folly of that pride which has led many <pb n="385" id="iv.ii-Page_385" />
to reject every thing in divine revelation which does not comport with their boasted 
reason, and is to them, dark and unintelligible; and to be sensible of the reasonableness 
and importance of modesty, humility and self diffidence; while we think and inquire 
concerning the being and character of God, and the Son of God, the Redeemer. Many 
by this pride, and trusting to what they call their own reason, have been led to 
renounce divine revelation, the only light and sure guide, in the high and important 
business of religion; and have plunged themselves into darkness and delusion. And 
others, though they profess to believe the Bible to be a revelation from God, reject 
the most essential and peculiar doctrines contained in it, on the account of which, 
men principally stand in need of a revelation from heaven.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.ii-p275">When we are once convinced, by undeniable, clear and abundant 
evidence, that the Bible contains a revelation from God; if we make a right use 
of our reason, we shall expect to find in it, declarations concerning God, his character 
and works, which are beyond our comprehension, and in this respect perfect mysteries 
to us; and that we shall not, at first, understand many things; yea, they may appear 
inconsistent and contradictory to us, which afterwards, by farther study and increase 
in the knowledge of divine things, we may understand, and see them to be plain and 
perfectly consistent. The things of God, or heavenly things, are so infinitely high, 
great and wonderful, that the greatest created, finite mind, falls infinitely short 
of fully comprehending all or any of them. The angels do not perfectly understand 
them. They may make swift advances in the knowledge of them, without end, and yet 
will forever fall infinitely short of reaching to their infinite height, so as to 
comprehend all. How ignorant and short sighted, then, must man be in those things, 
who not only has less natural capacity, but is sunk down in that moral depravity 
which is blindness itself, with respect to the things of the Spirit of God, and 
carries in the nature of it strong prejudices against them. How unreasonable, how 
arrogant, is it in him to imagine, that 
<pb n="386" id="iv.ii-Page_386" />he can, by his own scanty, corrupted discerning, at once understand, 
and fully comprehend, all he needs to know and believe concerning God and heavenly 
things! Such a conceit, such pride and arrogance, can take place no where, but among 
such fallen, apostate creatures as mankind are; and serves to verify the ancient 
declaration, “Vain man would be wise, though man be born like a wild ass’s colt.”<note n="400" id="iv.ii-p275.1"><p class="normal" id="iv.ii-p276">
<scripRef id="iv.ii-p276.1" passage="Job xi. 12" parsed="|Job|11|12|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Job.11.12">Job xi. 12</scripRef>.</p></note></p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.ii-p277">If a philosopher should undertake to teach children of eight or 
ten years old, a system of philosophy, would he think himself well treated by them, 
if they were disposed to call in question the truth of every proposition of his, 
which they did not directly understand; and immediately conclude that every thing 
he delivered to them for truth, was inconsistent and absurd, which they were not 
able to reconcile? So long as they were of this disposition, they could receive 
no instruction from him. They would find many things perfectly dark and unintelligible 
to them, and others would appear to their narrow, childish conceptions, inconsistent 
and impossible. But the objects of natural philosophy are not so much above the 
understanding and capacity of these children, as heavenly things are above the understanding 
of men. There is an infinite difference; especially if we take into the account, 
man’s moral depravity, which blinds him to the things of the Spirit of God.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.ii-p278">There are many things in natural philosophy, which men of the 
greatest capacities, and who have attended most to them, and made them their chief 
study, cannot understand; but remain unintelligible mysteries: Yea, there are propositions 
which appear to be inconsistent, and yet both of them must be received as true. 
For instance, it can be demonstrated that matter is infinitely divisible: And that 
matter is finite, is equally demonstrable; which two demonstrable propositions appear 
to be perfectly inconsistent.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.ii-p279">And shall we, to whom <i>earthly things</i> are, in so many instances, 
unintelligible, and appear inconsistent, imagine, that when God speaks to us of
<i>heavenly things</i>, things infinitely great, high and wonderful, we are able 
to comprehend them all; and are warranted to reject every thing as not true, and 
not revealed to us by him, <pb n="387" id="iv.ii-Page_387" />which we do not understand, or are not 
able to reconcile with each other!</p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.ii-p280">Let us rather become fools, that we may be wise. Sensible of our 
ignorance, and proneness to imbibe error, to love darkness rather than light; and 
put light for darkness, and darkness for light, let us study the Bible with a modest 
diffidence in our own reason and wisdom, and implicit confidence in our divine Instructor, 
looking to him to open our eyes to understand the scriptures, and behold the wonderful 
things revealed in those sacred oracles. “The <i>meek</i> will he guide in judgment; 
the <i>meek</i> will he teach his way.”<note n="401" id="iv.ii-p280.1"><p class="normal" id="iv.ii-p281"><scripRef id="iv.ii-p281.1" passage="Psalm xxv. 9" parsed="|Ps|25|9|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Ps.25.9">Psalm xxv. 9</scripRef>.</p></note></p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.ii-p282">II. <span class="sc" id="iv.ii-p282.1">This</span> subject brings into view the 
infinite fulness and sufficiency of God. A fulness equal to the wants of sinners, 
and suited to relieve and save them. In order to this, he must be not only infinitely 
powerful, wise and good; but subsist in a manner, of which we could know nothing, 
had he not revealed it, viz. a <span class="sc" id="iv.ii-p282.2">Trinity in unity</span>. And when 
revealed, it is infinitely above our comprehension. And if it were not so, we should 
have no reason to believe this was the true God: For the true God must be incomprehensible 
both in his existence and manner of subsistence. Had there not been a God subsisting 
in three persons, so distinct as to covenant with each other, and act a separate 
and distinct part in the work of redemption, man could not have been redeemed, and 
there could have been no Redeemer. They, therefore, who disbelieve the doctrine 
of the Trinity, and that the Redeemer is the second person in the Triune God, do 
really, though ignorantly, exclude the possibility of the redemption of man, and 
of a Redeemer equal to such a work; which will appear as we proceed in our inquiry 
into the work of redemption.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.ii-p283">But let us believe this revealed mystery, God the Son, manifest 
in the flesh, and adore, and rejoice in the infinite fulness and sufficiency of 
God, which appears in the person and character of the Redeemer, for the redemption 
of sinners: which fulness and sufficiency never could have been known to men or 
angels, had it <pb n="388" id="iv.ii-Page_388" />not been revealed, and the redemption of man had not 
taken place.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.ii-p284">III. <span class="sc" id="iv.ii-p284.1">We</span> are led by this subject, with 
wonder, gratitude and joy, to contemplate the ability and sufficiency of Jesus Christ 
to redeem sinners; and see that he is just such a Saviour as we need.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.ii-p285">Were he not a person of infinite greatness, dignity and worthiness, 
were he not God, his sufferings and obedience would have been of no avail to make 
atonement for the sins of men; to procure pardon, and merit eternal life for us. 
And were he not man, he could neither suffer nor obey. But being both these, he 
was equal to this. “Such an High Priest became us, who is holy, harmless, undefiled, 
separate from sinners, <i>and made higher than the heavens</i>.”<note n="402" id="iv.ii-p285.1"><p class="normal" id="iv.ii-p286"><scripRef id="iv.ii-p286.1" passage="Heb. vii. 26" parsed="|Heb|7|26|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Heb.7.26">Heb. vii. 
26</scripRef>.</p></note> And were he not almighty, infinitely wise and good, he would not be able 
and willing to rescue sinners from the power of sin and satan, and completely sanctify 
them, and make them meet for the inheritance in heaven. But being all this, he is 
a complete Redeemer: “For it hath pleased the Father that in him all fulness should 
dwell. Who is made of God, unto his people, wisdom, and righteousness, and sanctification, 
and complete redemption.”<note n="403" id="iv.ii-p286.2"><p class="normal" id="iv.ii-p287"><scripRef id="iv.ii-p287.1" passage="1 Cor. i. 30" parsed="|1Cor|1|30|0|0" osisRef="Bible:1Cor.1.30">1 Cor. i. 30</scripRef>. <scripRef passage="Col 1:19" id="iv.ii-p287.2" parsed="|Col|1|19|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Col.1.19">Col. 
i. 19</scripRef>.</p></note> And all the redeemed must know and say, “Surely in the 
Lord have I <i>righteousness</i> and <i>strength</i>: In the Lord Jesus Christ shall 
the seed of Israel he <i>justified</i> and shall glory.”<note n="404" id="iv.ii-p287.3"><p class="normal" id="iv.ii-p288"><scripRef id="iv.ii-p288.1" passage="Isa. xlv. 24" parsed="|Isa|45|24|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Isa.45.24">Isa. xlv. 24</scripRef>, <scripRef passage="Isa 45:25" id="iv.ii-p288.2" parsed="|Isa|45|25|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Isa.45.25">25</scripRef>.</p></note></p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.ii-p289">They who know their own state and character, as sinners, being 
wholly lost in sin, infinitely guilty and miserable; and believe in Christ, see 
all this in some degree. To such Christ is all-sufficient, most honourable and precious. 
But to them who are ignorant of themselves; the nature and ill desert of sin, and 
their own guilt and misery, who are unbelieving and disobedient, Jesus Christ, considered 
in his true character, is “a stone of stumbling, and rock of offence.”<note n="405" id="iv.ii-p289.1"><p class="normal" id="iv.ii-p290">
<scripRef id="iv.ii-p290.1" passage="1 Pet. ii. 7" parsed="|1Pet|2|7|0|0" osisRef="Bible:1Pet.2.7">1 Pet. ii. 7</scripRef>, <scripRef passage="1 Pet. 2:8" id="iv.ii-p290.2" parsed="|1Pet|2|8|0|0" osisRef="Bible:1Pet.2.8">8</scripRef>.</p></note></p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.ii-p291">His sufficiency also includes his inexhaustible, unbounded fulness, 
as the glorious object of knowledge, contemplation and love, and of enjoyment and 
happiness. The redeemed will attend forever to their Redeemer, who is infinite, 
and whose person and character <pb n="389" id="iv.ii-Page_389" />are full of wonders, with ever fresh 
and increasing delight. They will spring forward, in the full employ and strongest 
exertion of all their powers, and make swift progress in the knowledge of their 
Saviour, and in holiness and happiness, without ever coming to an end. Whatever 
wonders and glories they may have seen, and however high their love and happiness 
may be at any supposed future period, the Redeemer may with truth say to them as 
he did to Nathaniel, “Ye shall see greater things than these.” St. Paul entered 
upon this endless, progressive and happifying knowledge of Christ, when he commenced 
a christian, and was admitted into the school of his Lord and Master; which he expresses 
in the following words. “What things were gain to me, those I counted loss for Christ. 
Yea, doubtless, and I count all things but loss <i>for the excellency of the knowledge</i> 
of Christ Jesus, my Lord: <i>That I may know him</i>,” &amp;<i>c</i>.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.ii-p292">IV. <span class="sc" id="iv.ii-p292.1">The</span> view we have now had of the person 
and character of the Redeemer is suited to enlarge our ideas, and excite a sense 
of the infinite, wonderful condescension and love exercised and manifested in the 
work of redemption. The love of the Father is expressed in giving his only begotten, 
dear Son, to descend to such a low state of humiliation, of poverty, disgrace, and 
sufferings; even unto a most cruel death, to redeem man. And as this his own Son 
was equal to himself, and infinitely dear to him, the degree of love and goodness 
expressed in giving him up to redeem man, by suffering the curse under which he 
had fallen, must be infinite, and the greatest possible instance and exercise of 
disinterested benevolence, that can be conceived, or that ever did or can take place. 
And the more the greatness and dignity of the Son of God is known, and how dear 
he is to the Father, the greater will his sufferings appear to be, and the higher 
and more affecting will be the view and sense of the goodness of the Father, in 
giving up his Son to such sufferings. “God so loved the world that he gave his only 
begotten Son.” Herein is love!</p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.ii-p293">And the condescension and love of Christ in his humiliation and 
sufferings for the redemption of men, appear <pb n="390" id="iv.ii-Page_390" />in the most affecting 
and striking light, when we take into view his greatness and dignity, and the infinite 
height from which he descended, to such an amazing scene of debasement, ignominy 
and sufferings: And the more our ideas are enlarged in the view of the former, the 
greater sense shall we have of the latter. Hence it follows, that as his greatness, 
dignity and excellence are infinite, there is a foundation for increasing, endless 
views and admiration of “The love of Christ, which passeth knowledge.”</p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.ii-p294">V. <span class="sc" id="iv.ii-p294.1">By</span> considering the person of the Redeemer 
we are led to infer the height to which the redeemed are raised, the great honour 
which is conferred upon them, by their union to him. In the personal union of the 
human nature to the Son of God, the greatest honour is put upon it; and they who 
are united to this person as the redeemed are, rise to a degree of honour and exaltation, 
far above the angels, and unspeakably beyond all our present conceptions. They are 
the bride, the Lamb’s wife, and share in all his honours and riches. They are “Raised 
up together with him, and made to sit together in heavenly places with Christ Jesus.”<note n="406" id="iv.ii-p294.2"><p class="normal" id="iv.ii-p295">
<scripRef id="iv.ii-p295.1" passage="Eph. ii. 6" parsed="|Eph|2|6|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Eph.2.6">Eph. ii. 6</scripRef>.</p></note> 
In his exaltation, they are exalted, as members of his body, of which he is the 
head; and shall sit with him, on his high throne, and reign with him forever. This 
honour have all the saints.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.ii-p296">VI. We may hence see the warrant we have to worship and pray to 
Jesus Christ, and call upon his name. We have seen that he is worshipped by all 
the inhabitants of heaven; that the apostles and primitive christians prayed to 
him, and called on his name: And there is the same reason why his people should 
do so in all ages, and at all times. He is God manifest in the flesh, Immanuel, 
God in our nature. He has all power in heaven and on earth; and is head over all 
things to the church. He can do all things for us that we want; why should we not 
ask him for what we want, and constantly pray to him, acknowledging our absolute 
dependence on him, and his sufficiency and ability to do all for us? And is not 
a neglect to do this putting a slight upon him?</p>
<pb n="391" id="iv.ii-Page_391" />
<p class="normal" id="iv.ii-p297">It will be asked, perhaps, whether this be not expressly forbidden 
by Christ, when he says, “In that day ye shall ask me nothing: Verily, verily, 
I say unto you, Whatsoever ye shall ask the Father in my name, he will give it you.”<note n="407" id="iv.ii-p297.1"><p class="normal" id="iv.ii-p298">
<scripRef id="iv.ii-p298.1" passage="John xvi. 28" parsed="|John|16|28|0|0" osisRef="Bible:John.16.28">John xvi. 28</scripRef>.</p></note></p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.ii-p299">Ans. When he says, “In that day ye shall <i>ask</i> me nothing,” 
the word in the original is commonly used for <i>asking questions</i>. And not to
<i>make a petition</i>. The disciples had been asking him a number of questions 
for their information about things which they did not understand. Christ tells them 
in these words, that after his ascension they should have no opportunity or occasion 
to ask him any questions; for they should then have sufficient knowledge by the 
holy Spirit teaching them ail things they should have need to know. When he says, 
“Whatsoever ye shall <i>ask</i> the Father,” he uses another word for asking, which 
always signifies <i>to make a petition</i>.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.ii-p300">But from these last words there arises another question. Here 
Christ directs <i>to ask the Father in his name</i>. Is not this an implicit prohibition 
to ask any thing of him directly?</p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.ii-p301">Ans. This cannot be understood as a prohibition to pray to Jesus 
Christ, and call on his name, because the apostles and primitive christians did 
this, as has been shown. And perhaps, if the matter be properly considered, it will 
appear that praying directly to Jesus Christ, and asking him, is asking in his name, 
and asking the Father, as really, though not expressly, as when we ask the Father 
directly, in the name of Christ. Jesus Christ says, “I and my Father are one. 
What things soever the Father doth, these also doth the Son likewise.”<note n="408" id="iv.ii-p301.1"><p class="normal" id="iv.ii-p302"><scripRef id="iv.ii-p302.1" passage="John v. 19" parsed="|John|5|19|0|0" osisRef="Bible:John.5.19">John 
v. 19</scripRef>. <scripRef passage="John 10:30" id="iv.ii-p302.2" parsed="|John|10|30|0|0" osisRef="Bible:John.10.30">x. 30</scripRef>.</p></note> 
He hath, and exerciseth all the power that is in heaven and earth. It hath pleased 
the Father that all fulness should dwell in him. And the Father says to wretched 
man, “This is my beloved Son, <i>hear ye him</i>.” Whatever you want, go to him 
for relief and a supply; as Pharaoh said to the starving people, “Go to Joseph.” 
He then, who goes to Christ and asks the things which he wants of him, does really 
and in truth go to the Father, and asks of him, as he is the appointed governor 
and 
<pb n="392" id="iv.ii-Page_392" />steward, and has all things in his hands. “The Father loveth the Son, 
and hath delivered all things into his hand. All things that the Father hath, are 
mine.”<note n="409" id="iv.ii-p302.3"><p class="normal" id="iv.ii-p303"><scripRef id="iv.ii-p303.1" passage="John iii. 35" parsed="|John|3|35|0|0" osisRef="Bible:John.3.35">John iii. 35</scripRef>. <scripRef passage="John 16:19" id="iv.ii-p303.2" parsed="|John|16|19|0|0" osisRef="Bible:John.16.19">xvi. 19</scripRef>.</p></note> 
As the people by applying to Joseph, with whom all the authority and supplies u 
ere lodged, did really apply to Pharaoh; so they who apply to Christ and ask him, 
do really apply to the Father through him, and ask of the Father as really as if 
they expressly applied to him: For he and the Father are one, and what he does, 
the Father doth, and what the Father doth, the same doth the Son likewise. Therefore 
what our Saviour says in one passage the Father will do; in another he says, he 
himself will do the same. In the text under consideration he says, “Whatsoever ye 
shall ask the Father in my name, <i>he will give it you</i>.” At another time he 
said, “Whatsoever ye shall ask in my name, <i>that will I do</i>.” If ye shall ask 
any thing in my name, <i>I will do it</i>.”<note n="410" id="iv.ii-p303.3"><p class="normal" id="iv.ii-p304"><scripRef id="iv.ii-p304.1" passage="John xiv. 13" parsed="|John|14|13|0|0" osisRef="Bible:John.14.13">John xiv. 13</scripRef>, <scripRef passage="John 14:14" id="iv.ii-p304.2" parsed="|John|14|14|0|0" osisRef="Bible:John.14.14">14</scripRef>.</p></note> 
And we ask the Father in the name of Jesus Christ, when we go to Christ, and ask 
him; for in this way we approach to the Father, <i>through him</i>. We ask in the 
name of Christ, when we go immediately to Jesus Christ, and through him as a medium 
to the Father, as really and as much as if we apply expressly to the Father, and 
ask expressly in the name of Christ: For to ask in the name of Christ, is to rely 
on the atonement he has made, and on his merit and righteousness for the favour 
we ask. And this may be done when we apply immediately to Christ, as really and 
as much as if we apply expressly to the Father in his name.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.ii-p305">VII. <span class="sc" id="iv.ii-p305.1">This</span> subject is suited to excite 
in our minds a conviction, and impress a sense of the amazing, infinite crime and 
folly of slighting and rejecting the Redeemer of men. The crime of this is great 
in proportion to the greatness, worthiness and excellence of this person, and his 
amazing condescension and goodness exercised and manifested in what he has done 
and suffered for man.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.ii-p306">And the folly of it is great, in proportion to the greatness of 
the evil from which he offers to deliver us; and of the good and happiness which 
he has obtained for man and invites him to accept, both of which are infinite. <pb n="393" id="iv.ii-Page_393" />
How unspeakably great then must be this wickedness and folly! They are to us as 
incomprehensible in their magnitude, as are the person and works of the Redeemer; 
they are truly boundless and infinite! They are attended with innumerable other 
aggravations, which far exceed our thought. How much more guilty are they who reject 
and cast contempt upon Christ, than they could have been, had there been no such 
person, no such Redeemer! And their endless punishment who persist in slighting 
him and neglecting this salvation, and die impenitent, will be inconceivably greater. 
They slight, they reject and despise God, the Father, Son, and Holy Ghost, and declare 
themselves to be irreconcileable enemies to him, while he is offering to be reconciled 
to them, to pardon their multiplied and infinitely aggravated offences, and bestow 
on them eternal life, in consequence of the Redeemer’s undertaking in behalf of 
man, and obeying, and suffering unto death, for them. This serves to discover the 
universality, the exceeding greatness, and the malignity of the moral depravity 
of man. Jews and Gentiles acted this out, in the horrid action, never to be forgotten, 
in condemning and crucifying the Son of God, the Redeemer, when he was in their 
reach and power. And every man and woman who have lived since, and had opportunity 
to know the person and character of the Redeemer, have been guilty of the same crime, 
in a greater or less degree; as we have all slighted and abused him more or less; 
and so have, in this way, in some measure at least, joined with them who put him 
to death.</p>

</div2>

<div2 title="Chapter III. Concerning the Design and Work of the Redeemer." prev="iv.ii" next="iv.iv" id="iv.iii">

<h2 id="iv.iii-p0.1">CHAP. III.</h2>
<h3 id="iv.iii-p0.2">CONCERNING THE DESIGN AND WORK OF THE REDEEMER.</h3>
<p class="normal" id="iv.iii-p1">THIS is a subject upon which professing christians are far from 
being agreed. They differ in opinion respecting it, according to their different 
views of the <pb n="394" id="iv.iii-Page_394" />moral state and character of man; from what he is to 
be redeemed; and of what is necessary to be done or suffered in order to his redemption. 
And this lays the foundation of their difference of opinion respecting the person 
and character of the Redeemer. For he must be answerable to the state of man, and 
to that which must be done or suffered in order to his being delivered from sin 
and misery, and made completely happy forever consistent with the divine law, and 
the wisdom and honour of the moral Governor of man.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.iii-p2">There are not a few in the christian world who entertain such 
ideas of God, his law and moral government; of the character of man, and the nature 
and crime of sin, that they see no need of a Mediator and Redeemer, in order to 
the pardon and salvation of men: And therefore consider Jesus Christ as an impostor, 
and all who believe in him as deluded; and wholly discard divine revelation, and 
plunge into the darkness of Deism.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.iii-p3">The Jews are so ignorant of the nature of the moral law, and their 
own state, that they think they stand in need of no Redeemer, but one who shall 
deliver them from the power and oppression of man, and bestow on them temporal, 
worldly dominion, prosperity and happiness. They therefore reject Jesus Christ, 
and hope for the deliverance they desire, by <i>their</i> expected Messiah.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.iii-p4">There are many professing christians, who have much the same sentiments 
respecting God, law, sin, and the moral state of man, with Jews and deists; and 
consequently, though they profess to believe that Jesus Christ is the Saviour of 
men, they see no need of a Saviour that is more than a man, or a mere creature; 
and therefore do not believe in his divinity.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.iii-p5">Others have such views of God, his law and moral government, of 
the character and state of man in his apostasy, and of what is necessary to be done 
and suffered in order to their redemption, that they feel the need of a divine Redeemer; 
whose person and character has been described in the foregoing chapter, and which 
they are prepared to see plainly exhibited in the Bible.</p>
<pb n="395" id="iv.iii-Page_395" />
<p class="normal" id="iv.iii-p6">From this view, it appears that in order to understand the work 
of the Redeemer, the design of his undertaking, and what he does effect, mc must 
have right views of the law of God which man has transgressed; and of the state 
into which he is fallen by this rebellion.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.iii-p7">The law of God points out the duty of man, and requires of him 
what is perfectly right, and no more, or less. It cannot therefore be altered in 
the least degree, so as to require more or less, without rendering it less perfect 
and good. It is therefore an <i>eternal unalterable rule of righteousness</i>, which 
cannot be abrogated or altered in the least <i>iota</i>, by an infinitely perfect, 
unchangeable legislator and governor, consistent with his character, his perfect 
rectitude and righteousness. This law necessarily implies, as essential to it, a 
sanction or penalty, consisting in evil, or a punishment, which is in exact proportion 
to the magnitude of the crime of transgressing it; or the desert of the transgressor, 
which is threatened to be executed on the offender. This penalty which is threatened 
must be no more, nor less, than the sinner deserves, or the demerit of the crime. 
The least deviation from this would render the law so far imperfect, and wrong. 
Every creature under this law is under infinite obligations to obey it without any 
deviation from it in the least possible instance, through the whole of his existence; 
and every instance of rebellion tends to infinite evil, to break up the divine government, 
and bring ruin and misery on all the moral world: Therefore every transgression 
of this law, or neglect to obey it, deserves infinite evil as the proper punishment 
of it. Consequently this evil, this punishment, must be the threatened penalty of 
the law; which has been shown in a former chapter.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.iii-p8">Man by transgression has incurred the penalty of this law, and 
fallen under the curse of it; “For it is written, cursed is every one that continueth 
not in all the things which are written in the book of the law to do them.”<note n="411" id="iv.iii-p8.1"><p class="normal" id="iv.iii-p9">
<scripRef id="iv.iii-p9.1" passage="Gal. iii. 10" parsed="|Gal|3|10|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Gal.3.10">Gal. iii. 10</scripRef>.</p></note> 
This curse cannot be taken off, and man released, until it has its effect, and all 
the evil implied in it be suffered, <pb n="396" id="iv.iii-Page_396" />which man can never do, so as 
to be delivered from it, or from suffering, because a finite creature is not capable 
of suffering the evil contained in the curse in any limited duration; and therefore 
his sufferings must be without end, or everlasting. And no future obedience, should 
man repent and live perfectly obedient after he had transgressed, would atone for 
his sin, or remove the curse in the least degree, according to law: for his obedience, 
though ever so perfect, and continued ever so long, would be no more than what he 
constantly owed, and therefore no more than his duty, had he never transgressed. 
Thus man by sin fell into an irrecoverably lost state, and brought the curse of 
the law of God upon him, from which it is impossible he should deliver himself, 
or be delivered, consistent with this law, either by all possible sufferings or 
obedience of his own.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.iii-p10">This is the law of God, and is the voice of God to man, and is 
an unalterable expression of his heart, or moral character and perfection. It therefore 
cannot be altered or abated in the requirements of it, or in the threatening. It 
is as unchangeable as the divine character itself, being founded on the eternal, 
unchangeable reason and nature of things. And it is not consistent with the <i>truth</i> 
of God not to execute the threatening of his law: For this would not only be giving 
up and making void his law; but acting contrary to his own declaration. Divine threatenings 
are <i>predictions</i>, declaring what shall be, and what God will do in case of 
transgression of his law. And it is as inconsistent with truth not to execute his 
threatening, in the true meaning of it, as it is not to accomplish and bring to 
pass, what he has declared and promised shall take place. This law therefore must 
be maintained in the true meaning and spirit of it; as the grand and only perfect 
rule of rectoral justice, rectitude, or righteousness. And if it were possible that 
God should do any thing in his conduct towards moral agents, which should be inconsistent 
with this his law, or express the least disregard of it, it would be infinitely 
wrong, and contrary to truth, rectitude and righteousness, wisdom, and goodness. 
For this would be injurious to himself, and to his moral kingdom, and subversive 
of the greatest general good. Therefore if man <pb n="397" id="iv.iii-Page_397" />could not be redeemed 
and saved consistent with maintaining this law, and showing the highest regard to 
it, God could not be true, just, wise or good, in saving them or showing them any 
favour.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.iii-p11">But to pardon man and restore him to favour and happiness, in 
this situation, and remove the curse which the divine law fastens upon him, would 
be acting contrary to this law, repealing and renouncing it as a rule of righteousness, 
as not good and right: It would be joining with the sinner to disregard and dishonour 
the law; and favour, justify and encourage rebellion. This therefore would be inconsistent 
with rectitude, righteousness, wisdom and goodness, and infinitely contrary to these, 
and would put an eternal end to all perfect moral government. It would dethrone 
the Governor of the world, destroy his kingdom, and give full scope to the reign 
of rebellion, confusion and misery forever. Therefore it were better, infinitely 
better, that rebel man, even all mankind, should have the curse of the law fully 
executed on them, and they be totally miserable forever, than that this infinitely 
greater evil should take place by shewing favour to him, contrary to the dictates 
of the most perfect, righteous, and infinitely sacred law of God.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.iii-p12">This otherwise insuperable difficulty, this mighty bar and obstacle 
in the way of shewing any favour to man, and escaping eternal destruction, is the 
ground of the necessity of a Mediator and Redeemer, by whom it maybe wholly removed, 
and man be delivered from die curse of the law; and saved, consistent with the divine 
character, with truth, infinite rectitude, wisdom and goodness; and so as not to 
set aside and dishonour, but support and maintain the divine law and government. 
This is the light in which the scripture very expressly sets this matter. St. Paul, 
speaking of the pardon and salvation of man by Christ the Redeemer, says, “Whom 
God hath set forth to be a propitiation, through faith in his blood, <i>to declare 
his righteousness</i> for the remission of sins that are past: <i>To declare</i>, 
I say, <i>his righteousness: That he might be just</i>, and the justifier of him 
which believeth in Jesus.”<note n="412" id="iv.iii-p12.1"><p class="normal" id="iv.iii-p13"><scripRef id="iv.iii-p13.1" passage="Rom. iii. 25" parsed="|Rom|3|25|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Rom.3.25">Rom. iii. 25</scripRef>, <scripRef passage="Rom 3:26" id="iv.iii-p13.2" parsed="|Rom|3|26|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Rom.3.26">26</scripRef>.</p></note> Here the design of the 
Redeemer <pb n="398" id="iv.iii-Page_398" />is expressed, and the great thing he is to accomplish is 
to maintain and declare the righteousness, the rectitude, and unchangeable truth 
and perfection of God in opening a way by his blood, his sufferings unto death, 
for the free pardon of sinful man, consistent with his rectoral justice and truth, 
and doing that which is right and just both with respect to himself, his law and 
government, and all the subjects of his kingdom.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.iii-p14">The work of the Redeemer therefore has a primary respect to the 
law of God, to maintain and honour that, so that sinners may be pardoned and saved 
consistent with that, without setting that aside, or showing the least disregard 
to it, in the requirements and threatenings of it; but that it may be perfectly 
fulfilled; and especially that the threatening might be properly and completely 
executed, without which God could not be true or just in pardoning and saving the 
sinner. It was therefore predicted that he should “Magnify the law, and make it 
honourable.”<note n="413" id="iv.iii-p14.1"><p class="normal" id="iv.iii-p15"><scripRef id="iv.iii-p15.1" passage="Isaiah xlii. 21" parsed="|Isa|42|21|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Isa.42.21">Isaiah xlii. 21</scripRef>.</p></note> And Christ himself declares that he came 
into the world to fulfil the law. “Think not that I am come to destroy the law or 
the prophets: I am not come to destroy, but to <i>fulfil</i>. For verily I say unto 
you. Till heaven and earth pass, one jot or one tittle shall in no wise pass from 
the law, till all be fulfilled.”<note n="414" id="iv.iii-p15.2"><p class="normal" id="iv.iii-p16"><scripRef id="iv.iii-p16.1" passage="Matt. v. 17" parsed="|Matt|5|17|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Matt.5.17">Matt. v. 17</scripRef>, <scripRef passage="Matt 5:18" id="iv.iii-p16.2" parsed="|Matt|5|18|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Matt.5.18">18</scripRef>.</p></note> The law could not 
be fulfilled by Jesus Christ without his suffering the penalty of it, and obeying 
it perfectly. For to give up the penalty, and not execute the threatening of the 
law, when it is transgressed, is to dissolve and destroy the law: For a penalty 
is essential to a law, and where there is no penalty threatened there is no law, 
as has been shown. Therefore had the Redeemer undertaken to save man, without regard 
to the penalty of the law and suffering it himself, he would have come to make void 
the law and destroy it, to all intents and purposes. He could not “make reconciliation 
for sin, and bring in everlasting righteousness,” which it was predicted he should,<note n="415" id="iv.iii-p16.3"><p class="normal" id="iv.iii-p17">
<scripRef id="iv.iii-p17.1" passage="Dan. ix. 24" parsed="|Dan|9|24|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Dan.9.24">Dan. ix. 24</scripRef>.</p></note> without suffering the penalty of the law, the everlasting rule 
of righteousness. In doing this his love of righteousness and hatred of iniquity 
was exercised and displayed in the <pb n="399" id="iv.iii-Page_399" />most signal manner, and to the 
highest degree. Therefore it is with respect to this regard which he paid to the 
divine law in suffering the penalty and obeying the precepts of it, that it is said 
to him, “Thou hast loved righteousness, and hated iniquity; therefore God, even 
thy God, hath anointed thee with the oil of gladness above thy fellows.”<note n="416" id="iv.iii-p17.2"><p class="normal" id="iv.iii-p18"><scripRef id="iv.iii-p18.1" passage="Heb. i. 9" parsed="|Heb|1|9|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Heb.1.9">Heb. 
i. 9</scripRef>. <scripRef passage="Psa 45:7" id="iv.iii-p18.2" parsed="|Ps|45|7|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Ps.45.7">Psal xlv. 7</scripRef>.</p></note> The same is expressed 
in other words by St. Paul. “And being found in fashion as a man, he humbled himself, 
and became <i>obedient unto deaths even the death of the cross</i>. Wherefore God 
hath highly exalted him, and given him a name which is above every name.”<note n="417" id="iv.iii-p18.3"><p class="normal" id="iv.iii-p19">
<scripRef id="iv.iii-p19.1" passage="Phil. ii. 8" parsed="|Phil|2|8|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Phil.2.8">Phil. ii. 8</scripRef>, <scripRef passage="Phil 2:9" id="iv.iii-p19.2" parsed="|Phil|2|9|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Phil.2.9">9</scripRef>.</p></note> His being <i>obedient unto death</i>, strongly expresses 
his laying down his life for sinners, suffering and dying in their stead, agreeable 
to the particular command which he had received of his Father.<note n="418" id="iv.iii-p19.3"><p class="normal" id="iv.iii-p20"><scripRef id="iv.iii-p20.1" passage="John x. 18" parsed="|John|10|18|0|0" osisRef="Bible:John.10.18">John x. 18</scripRef>.</p></note> 
To this end he was “made under the law, to redeem them that were under the law.”<note n="419" id="iv.iii-p20.2"><p class="normal" id="iv.iii-p21">
<scripRef id="iv.iii-p21.1" passage="Gal. iv. 4" parsed="|Gal|4|4|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Gal.4.4">Gal. iv. 4</scripRef>, <scripRef passage="Gal 4:5" id="iv.iii-p21.2" parsed="|Gal|4|5|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Gal.4.5">5</scripRef>.</p></note> Sinful men were under the curse of the law; and in order to 
redeem them, the Redeemer must take their place under the law, and suffer the penalty, 
bear the curse for them, and in their room, which is expressed yet more fully, and 
in the most plain and unequivocal words in the preceding chapter. “Christ hath redeemed 
us from the curse of the law, being made a curse for us.” By being made <i>a curse 
for us</i>, can be nothing else but suffering the penalty, the curse of the law, 
under which we were, and which man must have suffered, had not the Redeemer suffered 
it for him, as he could not be redeemed in any other way, without destroying the 
law.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.iii-p22">From this general view of the design and work of the Redeemer 
of man, taken from the holy scriptures, the way is prepared for a farther stating 
and explanation of this subject, under the following particulars.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.iii-p23">I. <span class="sc" id="iv.iii-p23.1">One</span> important and necessary part of 
the work of the Redeemer of man, was to make atonement for their sins, by suffering 
in his own person the penalty or curse of the law, under which, by transgression, 
they had fallen; so that sinners might be pardoned and saved, consistent with the 
divine law, and without the least respect to that, or in any degree making it void; 
but so as to establish and honour the law.</p>
<pb n="400" id="iv.iii-Page_400" />
<p class="normal" id="iv.iii-p24">There is no truth in the Bible more clearly and abundantly revealed 
than this. This truth is evident from what has been above observed from the scriptures; 
but it is proper more particularly to attend to the scripture representation of 
this important subject.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.iii-p25">The institution of sacrifices of beasts and other animals, after 
the apostasy of man, and the declaration, that redemption should take place by the 
seed of the woman; and those more expressly appointed under the Mosaic dispensation, 
do all, more or less, illustrate and confirm this truth, and point out <i>vicarious 
sufferings</i> as necessary and effectual to make atonement for sin. The guilty 
person was ordered to bring the beast to the altar, and lay his hands on the head 
of it, and confess his sin; and then it was put to death and sacrificed on the altar 
by the priest, instead of the sinner, and he was forgiven, an atonement being made 
for his sin by the death and blood of the beast.<note n="420" id="iv.iii-p25.1"><p class="normal" id="iv.iii-p26">The paschal lamb was an eminent 
type of Christ, with a principal reference to which he is so often called “The Lamb, 
the Lamb of God.” Therefore he is called the christian’s passover. “For even Christ 
our passover is sacrificed for us.” [<scripRef id="iv.iii-p26.1" passage="1 Cor. v. 7" parsed="|1Cor|5|7|0|0" osisRef="Bible:1Cor.5.7">1 Cor. v. 7</scripRef>.] This lamb was slain, and roasted 
with fire, as an emblem of the sufferings and death of Christ. There was a particular 
direction and command respecting the blood of this lamb. “And they shall take of 
the blood, and strike it on the two side posts, and on the upper door post of the 
houses, wherein they shall eat it.—And the blood shall be to you for a token upon 
the houses where you are: And when I see the blood, I will pass over you, and the 
plague shall not be upon you to destroy you, when I smite the land of Egypt.” [<scripRef id="iv.iii-p26.2" passage="Exod. xii. 7" parsed="|Exod|12|7|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Exod.12.7">Exod. 
xii. 7</scripRef>, <scripRef passage="Exod 12:13" id="iv.iii-p26.3" parsed="|Exod|12|13|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Exod.12.13">13</scripRef>.] As the blood of this slain lamb, when applied according to divine direction, 
secured the Israelites from the destruction which fell on the Egyptians; so Christ 
was slain and sacrificed, that they to whom his blood is applied by their believing 
in him, may have their sins forgiven, and be secured from that destruction which 
they deserve, being delivered from the wrath to come. [<scripRef id="iv.iii-p26.4" passage="Eph. i. 7" parsed="|Eph|1|7|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Eph.1.7">Eph. i. 7</scripRef>. <scripRef passage="1Thes 1:10" id="iv.iii-p26.5" parsed="|1Thess|1|10|0|0" osisRef="Bible:1Thess.1.10">
1 Thess. i. 10</scripRef>.]</p></note> These sacrifices were of various kinds, and offered 
on different occasions, as types of Christ, and those things which related to him, 
and the atonement he was to make. For all these sacrifices were designed types of 
Christ, and in this all their worth and efficacy consisted. The death and blood 
of a beast could not in any measure or degree make atonement for sin, and was of 
no avail any farther than it had respect to Christ, and was a type and figure of 
his death, of his blood which he shed, which was the only real atonement, and which 
alone avails to take away sin. “For it is impossible <pb n="401" id="iv.iii-Page_401" />
that the blood of bulls and of goats should take away sins.” It was therefore in 
early times expressly declared, that sacrifices and offerings were not desirable, 
or of any worth, in themselves considered, and that God did not institute and require 
them for their own sake, as making any real atonement for sin; but that this should 
be made by an incarnate Redeemer, to whom they pointed as types and shadows of him.<note n="421" id="iv.iii-p26.6"><p class="normal" id="iv.iii-p27">
<scripRef id="iv.iii-p27.1" passage="Psalm xl. 6" parsed="|Ps|40|6|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Ps.40.6">Psalm xl. 6</scripRef>, <scripRef passage="Psalm 40:7" id="iv.iii-p27.2" parsed="|Ps|40|7|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Ps.40.7">7</scripRef>, <scripRef passage="Psalm 40:8" id="iv.iii-p27.3" parsed="|Ps|40|8|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Ps.40.8">8</scripRef>. <scripRef passage="Heb 10:4-9" id="iv.iii-p27.4" parsed="|Heb|10|4|10|9" osisRef="Bible:Heb.10.4-Heb.10.9">Heb. x. 4-9</scripRef>.</p></note></p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.iii-p28">And he is particularly pointed out by Isaiah, as making atonement 
for sin by suffering the evil which it deserves in the room of sinners, and for 
them, that they might escape punishment, and be pardoned. He says, “He was wounded 
for our transgressions, he was bruised for our iniquities. The chastisement of our 
peace was upon him, and with his stripes we are healed. The Lord hath laid on him 
the iniquity of us all. He was cut off out of the land of the living: For the transgression 
of my people was he stricken. It pleased the Lord to bruise him. He hath put him 
to grief: When thou shalt make his soul an <i>offering for sin</i>, he shall see 
his seed. By his knowledge shall my righteous servant justify many; <i>for he shall 
bear their iniquities</i>. He poured out his soul unto death, <i>and he bare the 
sin of many</i>.”<note n="422" id="iv.iii-p28.1"><p class="normal" id="iv.iii-p29"><scripRef passage="Isa 53:1-12" id="iv.iii-p29.1" parsed="|Isa|53|1|53|12" osisRef="Bible:Isa.53.1-Isa.53.12">Isaiah liii. chap, throughout</scripRef>.</p></note> 
To <i>bear sin</i>, or iniquity, is to suffer the punishment of it, or the evil 
which it deserves, and with which it is threatened. This appears not only from the 
plain, natural import of the phrases, but from the use of it in the Bible, of which 
there are many instances. The following are a few of them. “The holy garments shall 
be upon Aaron and his sons, when they come near unto the altar to minister in the 
holy place, <i>that they bear not iniquity and die</i>.”<note n="423" id="iv.iii-p29.2"><p class="normal" id="iv.iii-p30"><scripRef id="iv.iii-p30.1" passage="Exod. xxviii. 43" parsed="|Exod|28|43|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Exod.28.43">Exod. xxviii. 43</scripRef>.</p></note> 
“They shall therefore keep mine ordinance, <i>lest they bear sin for it, and die 
therefor</i>, if they profane it.”<note n="424" id="iv.iii-p30.2"><p class="normal" id="iv.iii-p31"><scripRef id="iv.iii-p31.1" passage="Levit. xxii. 9" parsed="|Lev|22|9|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Lev.22.9">Levit. xxii. 9</scripRef>.</p></note> Neither must the 
children of Israel henceforth come nigh the tabernacle of the congregation, <i>lest 
they bear sin, and die</i>.”<note n="425" id="iv.iii-p31.2"><p class="normal" id="iv.iii-p32"><scripRef id="iv.iii-p32.1" passage="Numb. xviii. 22" parsed="|Num|18|22|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Num.18.22">Numb. xviii. 22</scripRef>.</p></note> The apostles express 
the import of the sufferings and death of Christ by the same phrase. “So Christ 
was once offered <pb n="402" id="iv.iii-Page_402" /><i>to bear the sins of many</i>.”<note n="426" id="iv.iii-p32.2"><p class="normal" id="iv.iii-p33"><scripRef id="iv.iii-p33.1" passage="Heb. ix. 28" parsed="|Heb|9|28|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Heb.9.28">Heb. ix. 
28</scripRef>.</p></note> “Who his own self <i>bare our sins in his own body on the tree</i>.”<note n="427" id="iv.iii-p33.2"><p class="normal" id="iv.iii-p34">
<scripRef id="iv.iii-p34.1" passage="1 Pet. ii. 24" parsed="|1Pet|2|24|0|0" osisRef="Bible:1Pet.2.24">1 Pet. ii. 24</scripRef>.</p></note></p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.iii-p35">In the epistle to the Hebrews, the typical meaning of sacrifices 
of beasts is explained, and declared to be designed to point out the sacrifice and 
atonement which Christ has made, when he offered himself once for all, as a sacrifice 
to <i>put away sin</i>, and <i>bear the sins of many</i>; the plain meaning of which 
is, that he, by his sufferings, took on him the penalty of sin, and bore the punishment 
of it, so as effectually to put it away from all who believe in him, that it may 
never be laid to their charge, to condemn them: he having made full atonement and 
reconciliation. In this sense he is said to be the <i>propitiation</i> for the sins 
of men. And men are said to obtain redemption and forgiveness of sins by or through 
his blood, in allusion to the blood of the sacrifices under the law, which was the 
most essential thing in them, and is said to make the atonement. “The life of the 
flesh is in the blood, and I have given it to you upon the altar, to make an atonement 
for your souls: <i>For it is the blood that maketh atonement for the soul</i>.”<note n="428" id="iv.iii-p35.1"><p class="normal" id="iv.iii-p36">
<scripRef id="iv.iii-p36.1" passage="Levit. xvii. 11" parsed="|Lev|17|11|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Lev.17.11">Levit. xvii. 11</scripRef>.</p></note> Our Saviour says of the sacramental cup, when he instituted 
the Lord’s supper, “This is my blood of the New Testament, which is shed for many,
<i>for the remission of sins</i>.”<note n="429" id="iv.iii-p36.2"><p class="normal" id="iv.iii-p37"><scripRef id="iv.iii-p37.1" passage="Matt. xxvi. 28" parsed="|Matt|26|28|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Matt.26.28">Matt. xxvi. 28</scripRef>.</p></note> 
Agreeable to this, St. Paul says, “We are justified <i>by his blood</i>.”<note n="430" id="iv.iii-p37.2"><p class="normal" id="iv.iii-p38">
<scripRef id="iv.iii-p38.1" passage="Rom. v. 9" parsed="|Rom|5|9|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Rom.5.9">Rom. v. 9</scripRef>.</p></note> In whom we have redemption <i>through his blood, the forgiveness 
of sins</i>.”<note n="431" id="iv.iii-p38.2"><p class="normal" id="iv.iii-p39"><scripRef id="iv.iii-p39.1" passage="Eph. i. 7" parsed="|Eph|1|7|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Eph.1.7">Eph. i. 7</scripRef>.</p></note> And St. John says, “the blood of Christ cleanseth 
us, (that is, christians) from all sins.”<note n="432" id="iv.iii-p39.2"><p class="normal" id="iv.iii-p40"><scripRef id="iv.iii-p40.1" passage="1 John i. 7" parsed="|1John|1|7|0|0" osisRef="Bible:1John.1.7">1 John i. 7</scripRef>.</p></note> St. Peter tells 
believers that they were “<i>redeemed by the precious blood of Christ</i>, as of 
a lamb without blemish, and without spot.”<note n="433" id="iv.iii-p40.2"><p class="normal" id="iv.iii-p41"><scripRef id="iv.iii-p41.1" passage="1 Pet. i. 19" parsed="|1Pet|1|19|0|0" osisRef="Bible:1Pet.1.19">1 Pet. i. 19</scripRef>.</p></note> In heaven 
the saved adore the Redeemer and say, “Thou art worthy, &amp;c. <i>For thou wast slain, 
and hast redeemed us to God by thy blood</i>.”<note n="434" id="iv.iii-p41.2"><p class="normal" id="iv.iii-p42"><scripRef id="iv.iii-p42.1" passage="Rev. v. 9" parsed="|Rev|5|9|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Rev.5.9">Rev. v. 9</scripRef>.</p></note></p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.iii-p43">There are a multitude of passages in the New Testament which set 
this point in this same light, and clearly import that what Christ suffered was 
in man’s stead, and does avail to release all who believe in him, from suffering 
the penalty of the law; and that by this alone they <pb n="403" id="iv.iii-Page_403" />are redeemed from 
the curse of the law, which is eternal destruction. These passages are too many 
to be particularly quoted. Only a few therefore will be mentioned. Christ says, 
“The Son of man came not to be ministered unto, but to minister, <i>and to give 
his life a ransom for many</i>.”<note n="435" id="iv.iii-p43.1"><p class="normal" id="iv.iii-p44"><scripRef id="iv.iii-p44.1" passage="Matt. xx. 28" parsed="|Matt|20|28|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Matt.20.28">Matt. xx. 28</scripRef>.</p></note> He redeems or ransoms 
them by <i>giving his life</i>, his suffering unto death; this is the price, the 
ground of their deliverance. St. Paul says to believers, “Ye are bought with a price.”<note n="436" id="iv.iii-p44.2"><p class="normal" id="iv.iii-p45">
<scripRef id="iv.iii-p45.1" passage="1 Cor. vi. 20" parsed="|1Cor|6|20|0|0" osisRef="Bible:1Cor.6.20">1 Cor. vi. 20</scripRef>. <scripRef passage="1Cor 7:23" id="iv.iii-p45.2" parsed="|1Cor|7|23|0|0" osisRef="Bible:1Cor.7.23">vii. 23</scripRef>.</p></note> The word 
in the original, which is here translated <i>bought</i>, is the same with that in 
<scripRef id="iv.iii-p45.3" passage="Rev. v. 9" parsed="|Rev|5|9|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Rev.5.9">Rev. v. 9</scripRef>. which is translated <i>redeemed</i>. “Thou hast redeemed us to God by 
thy blood.” The price by which men are <i>bought</i>, and redeemed from the curse 
of the law, from endless destruction, is the blood of Christ, which he shed for 
the remission of sins, that is, his suffering unto death. The death of Christ, and 
the blood of Christ, mean the same thing. In shedding his blood and dying, he was 
made a curse, by which he has bought, redeemed, and delivered his people from the 
curse of the law. His life was the ransom he gave, the price which he paid for our 
redemption. Therefore the death of Christ is mentioned as that by which alone believers 
are delivered from condemnation, the condemning sentence, the curse of the law. 
“Who is he that condemneth? It is Christ <i>that died</i>.”<note n="437" id="iv.iii-p45.4"><p class="normal" id="iv.iii-p46"><scripRef id="iv.iii-p46.1" passage="Rom. viii. 34" parsed="|Rom|8|34|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Rom.8.34">Rom. viii. 34</scripRef>.</p></note> 
“For when we were without strength, in due time <i>Christ died for the ungodly</i>.”<note n="438" id="iv.iii-p46.2"><p class="normal" id="iv.iii-p47">
<scripRef id="iv.iii-p47.1" passage="Rom. v. 6" parsed="|Rom|5|6|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Rom.5.6">Rom. v. 6</scripRef>.</p></note> “I delivered unto you first of all, that which I also received,
<i>how that Christ died for our sins</i>.”<note n="439" id="iv.iii-p47.2"><p class="normal" id="iv.iii-p48"><scripRef id="iv.iii-p48.1" passage="1 Cor. xv. 3" parsed="|1Cor|15|3|0|0" osisRef="Bible:1Cor.15.3">1 Cor. xv. 3</scripRef>.</p></note> “For that 
he died, he died unto sin [or for sin] once.”<note n="440" id="iv.iii-p48.2"><p class="normal" id="iv.iii-p49">Rom. vi, 10.</p></note> “And for 
this cause he is the Mediator of the New Testament, <i>that by means of death</i>, 
for the redemption of the transgressions that were under the first Testament, &amp;c.”<note n="441" id="iv.iii-p49.1"><p class="normal" id="iv.iii-p50">
<scripRef id="iv.iii-p50.1" passage="Heb. ix. 15" parsed="|Heb|9|15|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Heb.9.15">Heb. ix. 15</scripRef>.</p></note> In these passages, and other similar ones, the death of Christ 
is represented as having respect to the sins of men, and as redeeming them from 
the curse which sin deserves, by taking the curse on himself. When it is said “Christ 
died <i>for our sins</i>,” the meaning must be that his death is the atonement and 
propitiation for sin; and that by it he <pb n="404" id="iv.iii-Page_404" />suffered the evil with which 
sin is threatened in the law, or the penalty and curse of the law; or that which 
is equivalent. To suffer <i>for sin</i> and <i>for the sinner</i>, is so far to 
take place of the sinner, as to suffer the evil which he deserves, and which otherwise 
the sinner must have suffered. Or, which is the same, the sufferings of Christ answer 
the same end with respect to law, and divine government, that otherwise must be 
answered by the eternal destruction of the sinner. The same sentiment is strongly 
expressed by St. Peter. “For Christ also hath once <i>suffered for sins</i>, the 
just for the unjust, that he might bring us to God.”<note n="442" id="iv.iii-p50.2"><p class="normal" id="iv.iii-p51">1 Pet. iii, 18.</p></note> 
Here it is to be observed, that three things are asserted in this sentence.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.iii-p52">1. That the <i>sufferings</i> of Christ make atonement, and are 
the only ground or means of the sinner’s reconciliation to God.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.iii-p53">2. That the sufferings of Christ were therefore for sin, and consequently 
must be the evil which sin deserves, and that to which the sinner was exposed, and 
which he must have suffered, had not Christ suffered it in his stead, or that which 
is equivalent.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.iii-p54">3. That the last clause, “That he might bring us to God,” respects 
the pardon of sinners, their deliverance from the curse of the law, and restoration 
to favour, which could not take place consistent with the holy righteous law of 
God, had not Christ suffered for their sin.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.iii-p55">On the whole, The scripture represents the atonement which Christ 
has made, by which sinners are delivered from the curse of the law, the wrath to 
come, to consist wholly in his suffering unto death for their sins, by which he 
suffered the evil which the law threatens for sin, or a complete equivalent, so 
as fully to answer the end of the threatening of the law, and all the purposes of 
moral government, consistent with the pardon of the sinner, as much as if the curse 
had been executed on the transgressor: And that this was one great, and the most 
important, essential and difficult part of the work of the Redeemer, and really 
implies the whole.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.iii-p56">Thus by the death, the blood of Christ, full atonement is made 
for sin; the curse of the law is executed <pb n="405" id="iv.iii-Page_405" />on the Redeemer, by which 
he has bought, redeemed his people from the curse, and opened the way for their 
pardon and complete redemption. He has been made a curse that he might deliver all 
who believe in him from the curse; but not so as in the least degree to remove their 
unworthiness and ill desert, but this remains, and will remain forever, it being 
improper, undesirable, and impossible that this should be removed, or that they 
should ever cease to deserve eternal destruction. They remain, and must continue 
to be as criminal as ever they were; so long as it remains true that they have been 
guilty of crimes which are pardoned, and from which they are justified by the blood 
of Christ.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.iii-p57">In order more fully to explain and establish the atonement of 
Christ, which he has made by his suffering unto death, as it has been represented 
from the holy scripture; and to obviate as far as possible, every difficulty and 
objection which may arise in the minds of any, it is proper and necessary to consider 
the following questions.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.iii-p58"><i>Question</i> 1. Where is the justice of an innocent person 
suffering for the guilty, and, on that account, delivering the criminal from the 
sufferings which he deserves? How can such a procedure honour the law, and support 
government?</p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.iii-p59"><i>Answer</i> l. The scripture states the matter so, and abundantly 
asserts, that Christ, though perfectly innocent and holy himself, did die for sinners, 
and in their behalf; that he suffered, the <i>just</i> for the <i>unjust</i>; and 
that by this, all who believe in him are delivered from the evil, the suffering, 
which they deserve, and saved forever. Therefore every objection to this, is equally 
an objection to the Bible. Let deists object, and triumph in the imagination that 
it is unanswerable; but let christians believe, and with care and honest meekness 
consider, whether this supposed difficulty may not be easily removed.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.iii-p60"><i>Answer</i> 2. Can it be reasonably asserted; is it true, that 
an innocent, worthy person may not justly, and with the utmost propriety, suffer 
in the room of a criminal, in order to save the latter from suffering, in any case 
whatsoever? Is not the contrary true, and agreeable <pb n="406" id="iv.iii-Page_406" />to the common 
sense of mankind? Benevolus sustained the best and most worthy character of any 
man in the kingdom. His wife was publicly guilty of a crime, for which the law of 
the state denounced a punishment, which she could not suffer and survive it; but 
it must prove fatal to her, if inflicted on her. The law was so good and important, 
that if the penalty were not inflicted, and the law were disregarded in favour of 
the criminal, the consequence would be most fatal to the kingdom, and sap the foundation 
of all authority, law and government, and introduce endless confusion and misery. 
The husband saw all this, and had rather his wife should suffer the extremity of 
the law, than that good government should be dissolved, or the law disregarded, 
which he loved, and wished to have maintained. He loved his wife so much, that he 
was willing to suffer the penalty of the law himself, if she might by this means 
escape it. He knew that he was able to go through this suffering, however dreadful, 
and survive it; and that his doing this in the sight of the whole kingdom, would 
do more honour to the law, and government would be better established and maintained, 
than if his wife should suffer as she deserved. He therefore stepped forward, and 
offered, and desired to take the evil upon himself, and suffer the penalty of the 
law in the room of his wife, and for her crime. His offer was accepted, and he suffered 
the whole, without the least mitigation.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.iii-p61">All the inhabitants and good subjects in the kingdom looked on 
and had not a thought of any injustice done to him, who offered to suffer for his 
wife; and did actually suffer the evil which she deserved. They saw and admired 
his benevolence and goodness to his wife, and his disposition and zeal to maintain 
the law and government. They beheld, and were highly pleased with the uprightness, 
rectitude and righteousness of their king, and his fixed determination to maintain 
his law, while he inflicted the penalty of it on a person whom he esteemed and loved 
above all others in his kingdom, when he stood in the place of the transgressor: 
And a greater discovery was made of this, and his high displeasure at rebellion, 
than if the criminal <pb n="407" id="iv.iii-Page_407" />herself had been punished. They were struck with 
the propriety, righteousness, wisdom and goodness, exercised and manifested in the 
whole affair, and ever after had a more clear apprehension, and greater sense of 
the sacredness, importance, and excellence of the law, and of the unreasonableness 
and magnitude of the crime of transgressing it; and loved and revered their king, 
and his law and government, more than ever they had done before.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.iii-p62">The husband and wife were unspeakably more happy in each other, 
than they were before, or than they could have been, had not all this taken place. 
Their mutual love was stronger and more sweet and happy. She saw more of his worthiness, 
excellence and love, than she could otherwise have done, and was most happy and 
swallowed up in the sweetest exercise of gratitude, and the most endearing affection, 
which knew no bounds or end.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.iii-p63">There were some indeed, who never had been cordial friends to 
the king; and had no great esteem of his laws or government, or of the husband; 
who thought the transgression of the wife small and trivial; which might and ought 
to have been forgiven, without all this ado, and suffering of the husband. They 
were disaffected, and offended with the whole transaction, and made innumerable 
and endless objections.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.iii-p64">This story may serve, in some measure, to illustrate this point, 
as well as some others, which will come into view hereafter; and to shew that an 
innocent, and most worthy person, may suffer for the crimes of the guilty, and yet 
no injustice be done to the sufferer; and the criminal may be by this, delivered 
from suffering what he deserves, and yet the law which he has transgressed, be well 
supported and honoured.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.iii-p65">The Redeemer voluntarily took the place of sinners; he chose to 
suffer in their stead. His language was, ”Then said I, Lo, I come. In the volume 
of the book it is written of me: I delight to do thy will, O my God; Yea, thy law 
is within my heart.”<note n="443" id="iv.iii-p65.1"><p class="normal" id="iv.iii-p66"><scripRef id="iv.iii-p66.1" passage="Psalm lxvii. 8" parsed="|Ps|67|8|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Ps.67.8">Psalm lxvii. 8</scripRef>.</p></note> “I lay down my life for the sheep. 
No man taketh it from me; but I lay it down of myself.”<note n="444" id="iv.iii-p66.2"><p class="normal" id="iv.iii-p67"><scripRef id="iv.iii-p67.1" passage="John v. 15" parsed="|John|5|15|0|0" osisRef="Bible:John.5.15">John v. 15</scripRef>, <scripRef passage="John 5:18" id="iv.iii-p67.2" parsed="|John|5|18|0|0" osisRef="Bible:John.5.18">18</scripRef>.</p></note> 
“Being in the form of God, he thought it not robbery to be equal with God; yet
<i>made </i><pb n="408" id="iv.iii-Page_408" /><i>himself</i> of no reputation; and <i>took upon him 
the form of a servant</i>, and was made in the likeness of men: And being found 
in fashion as a man, <i>he humbled himself, and became obedient</i> unto death, 
even the death of the cross.”<note n="445" id="iv.iii-p67.3"><p class="normal" id="iv.iii-p68"><scripRef id="iv.iii-p68.1" passage="Phil. ii. 6" parsed="|Phil|2|6|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Phil.2.6">Phil. ii. 6</scripRef>, <scripRef passage="Phil 2:7" id="iv.iii-p68.2" parsed="|Phil|2|7|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Phil.2.7">7</scripRef>, <scripRef passage="Phil 2:8" id="iv.iii-p68.3" parsed="|Phil|2|8|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Phil.2.8">8</scripRef>.</p></note> He suffered in the 
sight of all the moral world, and the design of his suffering was, and still is 
publicly declared and known, and that it was his choice thus to bear the evil which 
sinners deserved, that he might by this redeem them from it. And this is so far 
from being unjust or improper, that the righteousness and wisdom of God are hereby 
manifested and declared.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.iii-p69"><span class="sc" id="iv.iii-p69.1">Quest</span>. 2. The curse of the law dooms the 
sinner to be given up to the dominion of sin, and spiritual death without end: How 
then could Christ suffer the curse of the law, who knew no sin?</p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.iii-p70"><span class="sc" id="iv.iii-p70.1">Ans</span>. The curse of the law is the evil, 
the punishment of sin, and not <i>sin</i>, which is the cause of suffering: the 
crime itself which is threatened and punished. What is threatened as the penalty 
of the law, is natural evil, or pain and suffering for transgression, or moral evil. 
Spiritual death is moral evil; sin, the transgression of the law; for this the penalty 
is threatened and inflicted, and is not the penalty itself. This consists wholly 
in natural evil, pain and suffering; and not in actually violating the law. It is 
true, that being dead in trespasses and sins, or endless continuance under the power 
and dominion of sin, is implied in the sinner’s suffering the penalty of the law; 
but this is not the penalty, or any part of it, but the natural evil which attends 
it, and of which it is the occasion. The Mediator did not suffer precisely the same 
kind of pain, in all respects, which the sinner suffers when the curse is executed 
on him: He did not suffer that particular kind of pain which is the necessary attendant, 
or natural consequence of being a sinner, and which none but the sinner himself 
can suffer. But this is only a circumstance of the punishment of sin, and not of 
the essence of it. The whole penalty of the law may be suffered, and the evil suffered 
may be as much, and as great, without suffering that particular sort of pain. Therefore 
Christ, though with» out sin, might suffer the whole penalty, that is, as much and 
as great evil, as the law denounces against transgression. <pb n="409" id="iv.iii-Page_409" />The evil 
which sinners may suffer, on whom the penalty of the law is inflicted, may, and 
doubtless will, differ in many circumstances, and not be precisely of the same kind, 
in all respects; and yet each one of them suffer the penalty of the same law.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.iii-p71"><span class="sc" id="iv.iii-p71.1">Quest</span>. 3. How can the sufferings of Christ 
be suffering the curse of the law, or the evil which the law threatens, or so great 
an evil as the eternal destruction of the sinner, and of millions of them, since 
his sufferings were of a short duration, and were not, perhaps, equal in degree, 
to those which some one of the damned suffers every hour?</p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.iii-p72"><span class="sc" id="iv.iii-p72.1">Ans</span>. The magnitude of the sufferings of 
Christ, or the evil of his suffering as he did, docs not wholly consist in the quantity 
or degree of pain which he endured, or in the duration or length of time in which 
he suffered. The degree of pain which he suffered was very great; unspeakably greater, 
no doubt, than ever was, or can be suffered by any mere creature. He did not suffer 
in the least in his divine nature; but altogether in his human nature, but this 
was capable of suffering an unspeakably greater degree of pain, than any mere creature, 
not only by reason of the superior greatness of the human nature, which has been 
mentioned; but from the perfect union with the divine nature. A consciousness of 
this, and of the dignity and worthiness implied in it, must aggravate his suffering 
far beyond conception. And by this union the human nature was sustained and made 
capable of enduring a degree of sufferings far beyond, and much more dreadful, than 
what any mere creature is capable of bearing. But, as has been observed, the greatness 
of the evil of the sufferings of Christ, does not wholly, or chiefly consist in 
the degree of pain which he suffered, or in the duration of his suffering: But in 
the greatness, dignity, and worthiness of the person who suffered.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.iii-p73">The greatness of the evil, in the sufferings and reproach, and 
disgrace of any person, does not consist merely in the degree of pain which he suffers; 
but it is the greater or less, according to the excellence and worth of the person 
who suffers. This is so in the estimation <pb n="401" id="iv.iii-Page_401_1" />of all, who attend to the 
matter, and is agreeable, to the common sense and feelings of mankind. It is a greater 
evil for the excellent head of a family to be condemned, reproached, and spit upon, 
tortured in the most cruel manner, and put to death, by the servants of the family, 
than it would be to have one of the servants treated so, and suffer all this. It 
would certainly be so to the children of the family, who esteemed and loved their 
father, being sensible of his excellence and worth; and it would be judged so by 
all. If the general of an army, who had supported his station and character with 
the greatest dignity and honour, and who is the life and support of his army, should 
be made the object of reproach and contempt by his soldiers, and dragged through 
the ranks in a most ignominious manner, to the place of execution, and there put 
to death for a coward and traitor: This would be an unspeakably greater evil, than 
it would be for a private sentinel to suffer all this pain and disgrace.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.iii-p74">If a king who had long maintained a most righteous, wise and good 
government, and made a nation happy, being a person of the greatest excellence and 
true greatness and dignity, and sustaining the best character in the world, should 
be taken from his throne, by a number of banditti, and openly scourged through the 
streets of the city, and cast into prison; and then be taken from thence, and publicly 
put to a most cruel death; this would be a much greater evil, more undesirable and 
grievous, than for one of the lowest of his subjects to suffer all this reproach 
and pain. There is need only to mention these instances, in order to gain the assent 
of every one who will attend to the truth which is asserted, without any long train 
of reasoning upon it. It seems to be self evident; an irresistible dictate of common 
sense.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.iii-p75">Should such a king have a son of a most amiable and excellent 
character, having the greatest natural abilities, and being endowed with great wisdom 
and benevolence, beloved and honoured by all the virtuous, and justly dearer to 
his father than any other person: And this son should fall into the hands of a number 
of ruffians, who after they had joined to reproach, ridicule, and mock <pb n="411" id="iv.iii-Page_411" />
him, should put him to the most ignominious and cruel death that they could invent: 
Would not this be with the highest reason, beyond expression, a greater evil, and 
more grievous to the father, and all the inhabitants of that kingdom, than if the 
worthless servant in his family were treated thus, and suffered all this contempt 
and pain? It is presumed every one to whom such a case is proposed, will answer 
in the affirmative. And this is granting what most certainly none can deny, viz. 
That the more excellent and honourable any person is, and the more he is justly 
esteemed and beloved, and the greater his worth and importance, the greater and 
more grievous is the evil, in his unjustly suffering reproach and pain; and that 
the evil of such suffering, is great, in proportion to the excellence, dignity, 
worth and importance of the person who suffers.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.iii-p76">From this truth, which is so evident and certain, it follows, 
as an undeniable consequence, that for the Redeemer to suffer as he did, is an
<i>infinite evil</i>. For, as has been shewn, he is a person of infinite greatness, 
dignity, excellence, worth and importance; and infinitely beloved and dear to the 
Father. To the Father who sees all things as they are, and most perfectly comprehends 
the infinite excellence, dignity and worth of his infinitely well beloved and only 
begotten Son, it must appear an infinite evil for him to suffer what he did for 
the redemption of sinners. And in the sight of the Son, he undertook to suffer infinite 
evil, when he came into the world. And to the redeemed, as they grow in a view and 
sense of the greatness, dignity and worth of their Redeemer, and know more and better 
who he is, who died on the cross to redeem them, the greater will the evil of his 
sufferings appear; and consequently, the more clearly will they see the greatness 
of the price by which they were bought, and the sufficiency of his blood to cleanse 
from all sin, and how perfectly the threatening of the law is answered in the sufferings 
of Christ.<note n="446" id="iv.iii-p76.1"><p class="normal" id="iv.iii-p77">In the view of the infinite natural evil there is in the sufferings 
and death of the Son of God, may be seen the magnitude of the crime of which the 
Jews and all who joined with them, were guilty, who were active in bringing this 
evil upon him; who condemned, reviled and mocked him, inflicted pain and distress 
upon him, and put him to an ignominious and most cruel death. The crime of all sin 
is great in some proportion to the magnitude of the natural evil which is effected 
by it, or which it tends to produce. In this instance, the natural evil which they 
effected is infinite; therefore their crime in doing this was infinite, that is, 
they hereby rendered themselves infinitely guilty and ill deserving. It was just, 
that they should suffer as great and as much natural evil, as their volitions did 
actually produce, or tended to produce. And all who have reproached and slighted 
the Redeemer, all who have opposed and rejected him, from that time to this day, 
have really joined with those who put him to death, and in their hearts say, “Let 
him be crucified,” and are guilty of that which is infinitely criminal, and deserve 
to have infinite evil inflicted upon them. And in this instance of the sin of men, 
actually producing infinite natural evil, is to be seen the infinitely evil and 
malignant nature of all sin It tends to produce infinite natural evil; and therefore 
the sinner deserves to have this evil inflicted upon him, which has been before 
observed.</p></note></p>

<pb n="412" id="iv.iii-Page_412" />


<p class="normal" id="iv.iii-p78">The evil of the sufferings of Christ, being in the magnitude of 
it commensurate with the dignity and worth of his person, is equal to, is as great 
as the evil which is threatened to the transgressors of the law, and as great as 
the sinner deserves; yea, it is as great as the endless sufferings of all mankind; 
for that is no more than infinite; therefore Christ by his sufferings, paid a price, 
and made an atonement sufficient to redeem the whole world from the wrath to come: 
And it is not owing to any want or defect in this, that all are not saved; for it 
is <i>boundless</i>; but this is owing to something else, which will be considered 
in the sequel.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.iii-p79">Thus it appears that though sin be an infinite evil, and deserves 
infinite natural evil, which is the penalty of the law of God, and the threatened 
punishment of sin, yet it could be suffered by Christ in a limited duration, a short 
time, since the evil of his suffering as he did must be great in proportion to the 
greatness, dignity, and worthiness of the sufferer, which are infinite.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.iii-p80">If it should be asked, how the sufferings of Christ can be considered 
as an infinite evil, since he is not less, but more happy and glorious, and will 
be so forever, than if he had not suffered; and the good which comes to his church 
and kingdom by his suffering, is, and will be so great, as to overbalance and swallow 
up all the evil? This may be answered by observing,</p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.iii-p81">1. If there be any thing in this argument, and the evil of suffering 
be not so great, but less, in proportion to the greatness of good of which it is 
the occasion; then it will follow, that there is no evil at all in the suffering 
of Christ; because it is the occasion of overbalancing good, and of much more good, 
on the whole, than <pb n="413" id="iv.iii-Page_413" />if he had not suffered. If every degree of good 
which is the consequence of suffering, and of which suffering is the occasion, does 
cancel one degree of the evil of suffering, and render it no evil; then the overbalancing 
good, occasioned by suffering, cancels all the evil of the suffering, and renders 
it no evil: Which it is supposed none will admit; for all will grant there is some 
degree of evil, at least, in the sufferings of Christ.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.iii-p82">2. The evil of suffering is not the less, <i>in itself considered</i>, 
however great be the good of which the pain and suffering is the occasion. Therefore 
the evil of the sufferings of Christ is as great, as if they had been the occasion 
of no good, but of evil. We must determine what evil there was in the suffering 
of Christ, not by taking into view the consequences of his suffering, but by considering 
the suffering itself, and the person suffering; and if the evil appears to be infinitely 
great, thus considered, as it has been proved it does, then, whatever be the consequence 
of the evil suffered, and however great the good be of which it is the occasion, 
it alters not the magnitude of the evil suffered; but it must remain eternally the 
same, in itself considered.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.iii-p83">It is granted, and has been proved, in a former chapter, that 
no evil has taken place in the universe, or ever will, that is not the occasion 
of an overbalancing good; so that, on the whole, there is more good than if there 
had been no evil: And in this sense, all evil is turned into good, that is, it is 
on the whole, all things considered, not evil, but good. But it does not follow 
from this, that there is nothing of the nature of evil, or no evil, considered in 
and by itself: There is, notwithstanding, in this view of it, infinite evil.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.iii-p84">If the overbalancing good, of which evil is the occasion, cancels 
the evil, in itself considered, then the damned suffer no evil; for all their sufferings 
are the occasion of an overbalancing good. The querist, therefore, may as well ask, 
how eternal damnation can be an infinite evil, or any evil at all, since it is the 
occasion of an overbalancing good? And he may with equal reason assert, that Joseph 
suffered no evil by being sold a slave into Egypt, and east into prison there, “whose 
feet they hurt with fetters, and he was laid in iron,” <pb n="414" id="iv.iii-Page_414" />and say there 
was no evil in all this, since God meant it for good; and it was the occasion of 
so much good to Joseph himself, and to his father’s house. Ask Joseph. Ask his father. 
Ask common sense.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.iii-p85"><span class="sc" id="iv.iii-p85.1">Quest</span>. 4. If Christ suffered as great, 
and as much evil, yea, more than the redeemed would have suffered, had they not 
been redeemed, but been miserable forever; then there is no less evil in the universe, 
than there would be, if they had not been redeemed; but really much more. Where 
is the advantage then of redemption, and what is gained by it?</p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.iii-p86"><span class="sc" id="iv.iii-p86.1">Ans</span>. The advantage gained by redemption, 
to the universe, is <i>the overbalancing good</i> which is produced by it. AH natural 
evil is, in itself considered, undesirable, and cannot be desired for its own sake; 
but may be desired and chosen, for the sake of the good of which it is the occasion, 
and which cannot take place in any other way. It would have been undesirable that 
there should be evil in the universe, and therefore there would have been none, 
had it not been necessary in order to a greater, overbalancing good: But it is desirable 
that every instance and degree of evil, which is necessary to promote the greatest 
good, should take place, however much and great this be. The suffering and death 
of the Redeemer is in itself an infinite evil; but as this was necessary in order 
to effect a proportionably greater, overbalancing, superabounding good, it was desirable 
it should take place; for the sake of ”the glory that should follow.” This event 
is of infinite advantage to the universe. God is glorified more by the redemption 
of man than by all his other works, and there will be an eternal, bright, and most 
happifying display of the divine perfections, which could not have taken place, 
had not Christ thus suffered. Had he not suffered as he did, he would not have entered 
into his glory, that glory and felicity which he will enjoy forever as the fruit 
of his suffering. And an eternal, glorious and most happy kingdom exists in consequence 
of this. Thus not only the salvation of the redeemed from eternal destruction is 
effected by the suffering of the Redeemer, but they are eternally happy; and not 
only so, but they and all holy beings will be unspeakably more happy <pb n="415" id="iv.iii-Page_415" />
forever, than they could otherwise have been; and God and the Redeemer are beyond 
all conception more glorified; so that there will be infinitely more good in the 
universe, both moral and natural, than could have been, had not Christ suffered 
and entered into his glory. And all the other evil that has been, or will take place, 
is, by the sufferings of Christ, made the occasion of much greater good, than it 
could otherwise have been. Surely no one, who well considers all this, will ask, 
“Where is the advantage of redemption, and what is gained by it?”</p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.iii-p87"><span class="sc" id="iv.iii-p87.1">Question</span> 5. To suffer the penalty of the 
law is to be <i>accursed</i>, the subjects of God’s displeasure and wrath; but God 
the Father was not displeased with his Son Jesus Christ; for he was always his beloved 
Son, and even in his sufferings the Father was pleased with him, and loved him because 
he gave his life for the redeemed. How then could Jesus Christ suffer the penalty 
of the law?</p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.iii-p88"><span class="sc" id="iv.iii-p88.1">Ans</span>. St. Paul says, “Christ hath 
redeemed us. from the curse of the law, <i>being made a curse for us</i>: as it 
is written, cursed is every one that hangeth on a tree.”<note n="447" id="iv.iii-p88.2"><p class="normal" id="iv.iii-p89"><scripRef id="iv.iii-p89.1" passage="Gal. iii. 13" parsed="|Gal|3|13|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Gal.3.13">Gal. iii. 13</scripRef>.</p></note> 
In the place to which the apostle refers, the words are, “He that is hanged, is 
accursed of God.” And there is indeed no real curse but the curse of God. Christ 
therefore was made such, even the curse of the law, in order to deliver believers 
in him from this curse. The curse of the law consists in the infinite evil, pain 
and suffering which sin deserves, as has been shown. He who suffers this for sin, 
suffers the curse of the law, is accursed, or made a curse. Jesus Christ suffered 
this curse, the infinite natural evil in which the penalty or the curse of the law 
consists; and in suffering it for sinners, and in their stead, was made a curse. 
This might be consistent with his having the approbation of the Father, and his 
favour and love to the highest degree. The displeasure of God, which was the cause 
of his sufferings, and which was manifested and expressed in his sufferings when 
he voluntarily took, and stood In the place of sinners, was displeasure with sin, 
and the sinner, and not with him who suffered; the 
<pb n="416" id="iv.iii-Page_416" />state of the case being fully understood by the spectators. Great 
displeasure and wrath was indeed discovered and expressed in the sufferings of Christ. 
For all natural evil, wherever it takes place, is an expression of the divine displeasure 
with sin; and could not have been inflicted, in any case, had no moral evil existed; 
and the greater the natural evil is, which is inflicted, the more or the greater 
degree of displeasure is expressed. And for the Son of God to suffer all this, the 
whole curse, without any mitigation or abatement, when he so far espoused the cause 
of sinners, as to take their place, and suffer for them, when he was not only innocent, 
but infinitely beloved by the Father, and most honourable and worthy in his sight, 
was a much greater manifestation and expression of the divine hatred of rebellion, 
and his unalterable disposition to inflict the penalty of his law, and maintain 
his moral government, than if every sinner had been punished, and the penalty of 
the law were inflicted on all transgressors without exception. The Father’s not 
sparing his own Son, but giving him up to suffer the whole curse of the law, when 
he espoused the cause of sinners, is a most striking evidence of rectitude and righteousness, 
and regard to his law, and fixed determination to support it, and inflict the penalty, 
even though his own well beloved Son must suffer it. And that must be great displeasure 
and wrath which is expressed by the suffering and death of the Son of God, a person 
so infinitely worthy, and so beloved by the Father.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.iii-p90">When the Son of God is beheld thus suffering, expiring on the 
cross in the sight of the whole universe, and crying out, “My God, my God, why hast 
thou forsaken me?” it is natural to inquire and consider, “Wherefore hath the Lord 
done thus unto his only begotten, dearly beloved Son: <span class="sc" id="iv.iii-p90.1">What meaneth 
the heat of this great anger</span>?” The answer will be easy to all the discerning: 
They will understand the reason and design of the whole, and the instruction will 
dwell on their minds with increasing clearness and energy forever. It will be forever 
known and kept in view in the kingdom of God, that mankind rose in rebellion, and 
fell under the curse of the law of God, and his <pb n="417" id="iv.iii-Page_417" />high displeasure: 
And that a way might be opened for a reconciliation, and favour to man, consistent 
with the divine law which cursed him, and with the righteousness and wisdom of Governor 
of the world, the Son of God took the place of man, was made under the law, and 
took the curse upon himself; which therefore was inflicted on him without the least 
mitigation. This is the reason of these dreadful sufferings of this infinitely great 
and worthy personage. “It pleased the Lord thus to bruise him, and put him to grief,” 
as the strongest expression of his great displeasure, and the heat of his anger 
with the sinners whose cause he espoused, so as to take their place, and answer 
for them. This wrath is not against the Son of his love; but against the rebellion 
of those sinners for whom he suffers.<note n="448" id="iv.iii-p90.2"><p class="normal" id="iv.iii-p91">See <scripRef id="iv.iii-p91.1" passage="Deut. xxix. 22-28" parsed="|Deut|29|22|29|28" osisRef="Bible:Deut.29.22-Deut.29.28">Deut. xxix. 22-28</scripRef>.</p></note></p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.iii-p92">The Redeemer being united to those sinners for whom he had undertaken 
to suffer by the most strong, ardent, benevolent affection, and by thus taking their 
place as their head and Saviour, was prepared in and by his human nature to be impressed 
with a clear apprehension and awful sense of the dreadful displeasure of God with 
them, and with sin, and to have the most painful sensation, of their infinitely 
miserable situation as deserving and justly exposed to the effects of the heat of 
his anger and wrath. And thus this anger and wrath, in this sense, fell on him, 
and his soul, in this situation, and thus united to them, was necessarily filled 
with the greatest pain and distress. And all things were so ordered, when the time 
of his most dreadful sufferings came on, as to raise this view and sensation to 
the highest degree. The comfortable and happifying sense of the love and favour 
of God was withdrawn, and the human soul was filled with the most dreadful gloom, 
distress and horror in a most keen sense of the anger and wrath of God, net against 
himself personally, bur with those whom he loved, and were, in a sense, one with 
him; so that their evil was his evil, and it even necessarily came on him. In this 
sense he suffered the displeasure and wrath of God. He felt it as insupportably 
dreadful, and had an overwhelming sense of it. And <pb n="418" id="iv.iii-Page_418" />the displeasure 
and wrath of God against sinners was the cause of all his sufferings.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.iii-p93">This appears to have been the chief source of the sufferings of 
Christ. What he suffered by his body, by the cruelty and rage of men, who could 
only torture him in his body, though great, was as nothing, compared with what he 
suffered in his mind, by the circumstances just mentioned. Many martyrs have suffered, 
as great bodily pain as was inflicted on the Redeemer; and they have endured it 
with great comfort and joy. Their minds have appeared to be out of the reach of 
the bodily tortures which were inflicted on them, so that they hardly felt them; 
but rejoiced in God, and the light of his countenance. Why then was the soul of 
the Redeemer troubled, and sorrowful even unto death? Why were there no expressions 
of comfort and joy even on the cross? Why did he cry out “My God, my God, why hast 
thou forsaken me?” The view of the case as stated above, will fully account for 
it, and appears to be the only satisfactory account of the matter.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.iii-p94">Thus we see how Christ suffered for sin, was made a curse, that 
is, suffered the curse of the law, the curse of God: and in his sufferings, he, 
in a sense, suffered and felt the displeasure and wrath of God; and the anger of 
God against sin and the sinner was in a high and eminent degree manifested and expressed 
in the sufferings and death of Christ, consistent with his not being displeased, 
but well pleased with Christ himself, and loving him because he laid down his life 
for his people.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.iii-p95">The instance mentioned above, of the husband suffering for the 
crime of his wife, and in her stead, serves in some measure to illustrate this point. 
The displeasure of government, or of the king, with the criminal, and the great 
offence she had given, and his fixed determination to manifest and express this 
by inflicting the penalty threatened to such offences, were as fully exhibited, 
and made known by the suffering of the husband in her stead, as if she had suffered, 
and, in some respects, much more, as the king would not, in this case, spare him, 
though he was a person so greatly esteemed and beloved. And he might with truth 
be said to suffer the displeasure and wrath of the king, as this was the <pb n="419" id="iv.iii-Page_419" />
cause of his sufferings, and was expressed in them; of which he was not personally 
the object, but the criminal.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.iii-p96"><i>Question</i> 6. How is the threatening of the law in truth 
and reality executed by the sufferings of another, and not of him who is threatened? 
The transgressor only is threatened; and if it be not executed on him, it is not 
really executed at all. How can the sufferings of another, who is not the transgressor, 
and is not threatened, answer any end with respect to the threatening?</p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.iii-p97"><i>Ans</i>. 1. It has been shown, and it is abundantly evident 
from scripture, that the sufferings of Christ had respect to the threatening of 
the law. Were there no such threatening, or were it not to be regarded, there could 
be no occasion for any suffering, and there would be no reason why Christ should 
suffer in order to the redemption of man. It has also been made evident that Christ 
did suffer the curse of the law, or the threatened penalty.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.iii-p98">He suffered the evil threatened, or as great evil, a complete 
equivalent, if not precisely the same evil in every circumstance, which the sinner 
must have suffered, had the threatening been executed on him. It has, moreover, 
been shewn that all the ends of die threatening, and of a penalty, are as fully 
answered by the sufferings of Christ, as they could be by the execution of it on 
the sinner: As much respect is paid to the divine law; government is as well supported; 
the rectitude and righteousness of God, is as much declared; and his displeasure 
with the sinner and hatred of rebellion, and determination to punish it, as much 
manifested; and in some respects much more, and to greater advantage. If there be 
any difficulty still remaining in the case, it is, whether a <i>substitute</i> may 
suffer the penalty in the room of the sinner, and the latter, by this means, escape 
punishment, consistent with the threatening, and so that it shall be truly and properly 
executed, and the truth of the legislator in the threatening be maintained. Or whether 
the threatening can be really executed by <i>vicarious</i> sufferings.</p>
<pb n="420" id="iv.iii-Page_420" />
<p class="normal" id="iv.iii-p99">This leads to</p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.iii-p100"><span class="sc" id="iv.iii-p100.1">Ans</span>. II. It is evident from scripture, 
that the law of God does admit of a <span class="sc" id="iv.iii-p100.2">substitute</span>, both in 
obeying the precepts, and suffering the penalty of it; and that this is consistent 
with the true spirit and meaning of it.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.iii-p101">When man was first created, and placed under the law of God, and 
moral government, Adam, the Father of the human race, was constituted their public 
head and representative, to obey the law for them, so that they should have the 
benefit of his obedience, and obtain eternal life by it, if he persevered in obedience 
through the appointed time of trial. Thus Adam was made a substitute, to obey the 
divine law for all mankind, in their room and stead. And it was hereby publicly 
declared by God, the Legislator, that his law admitted of a substitute. And if the 
law admitted of a substitute to obey for all the rest, of whom he was made the natural 
and constituted head; and by his single act of disobedience to bring sin and ruin 
on ail his posterity; and God had declared that this was the best and most wise 
way of administering his moral government in this world: then a substitute might 
suffer the penalty of the law for man, and redeem him from that sin and ruin which 
was brought upon him by the disobedience of a substitute, if a proper person, sufficient 
to suffer this, and survive the suffering, can be found. Had Adam, after he transgressed 
and incurred the penalty of the law, been able to suffer it, and survive and perfect 
the obedience which was required, this would have answered the law, according- to 
the declared meaning of it: He would have retrieved himself, and saved his posterity 
from sin and ruin. Adam was infinitely unequal to this: But a “second Adam” 
was found; a second public head and representative, of whom the first Adam was a 
type, figure or model, who was able to suffer the penalty of the law for man, and 
in his stead, and survive the dreadful scene; and by it redeem man, even all who 
are united to him by believing in him, from the curse of the law.<note n="449" id="iv.iii-p101.1"><p class="normal" id="iv.iii-p102">See <scripRef id="iv.iii-p102.1" passage="Rom. v. 14" parsed="|Rom|5|14|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Rom.5.14">Rom. 
v. 14</scripRef>. <scripRef passage="1Cor 15:45,47" id="iv.iii-p102.2" parsed="|1Cor|15|45|0|0;|1Cor|15|47|0|0" osisRef="Bible:1Cor.15.45 Bible:1Cor.15.47">1 Cor. xv. 45, 47</scripRef>. <scripRef passage="Gal 3:13" id="iv.iii-p102.3" parsed="|Gal|3|13|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Gal.3.13">
Gal. iii. 13</scripRef>. <scripRef passage="Ps 89:19,20" id="iv.iii-p102.4" parsed="|Ps|89|19|89|20" osisRef="Bible:Ps.89.19-Ps.89.20">Ps. lxxxix. 19, 20</scripRef>.</p></note></p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.iii-p103">Therefore, this being the declared meaning of the law, that it 
admitted a substitute, both to obey the precepts <pb n="421" id="iv.iii-Page_421" />of it, and to suffer 
the penalty, and that the threatening of it was to be so understood; a second public 
head and substitute, who was revealed and promised when the first Adam had ruined 
himself and his posterity, has risen and suffered the penalty, in the room of sinners. 
Thus the threatening has been fully executed according to the true and declared 
meaning of it, when it was given; and as it has been fully explained in the divine 
conduct, in constituting a second man, the last Adam, and inflicting the threatened 
penalty on him. And in this way, “mercy and truth are met together: Righteousness 
and peace have kissed each other.”<note n="450" id="iv.iii-p103.1"><p class="normal" id="iv.iii-p104"><scripRef id="iv.iii-p104.1" passage="Psalm lxxxv. 10" parsed="|Ps|85|10|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Ps.85.10">Psalm lxxxv. 10</scripRef>.</p></note> 
God has, agreeable to the strictest truth, executed the threatening of his law, 
according to the true intent and meaning of it; and by this has opened a way for 
reconciliation and peace with man, while his truth and righteousness are maintained, 
and gloriously manifested.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.iii-p105"><span class="sc" id="iv.iii-p105.1">Quest</span>. 7. Do not the sufferings of Christ 
remove the ill desert of those who believe in him? Christ has suffered all the evil 
that sin deserves, all that to which the sinner is liable, from the threatening 
and his ill desert, as great, and as much as could justly be inflicted on the sinner. 
If the sinner could have suffered all this evil himself, and survive such sufferings, 
he would then have no ill desert, it would not be just to inflict any more evil 
upon him. And if Christ has suffered it all for him, and in his stead, how can he 
deserve any punishment? And what grace is there then in pardoning the sinner who 
believes in Christ; or rather, What need has he of pardon?</p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.iii-p106"><span class="sc" id="iv.iii-p106.1">Ans</span>. The sufferings of Christ do not alter 
the character of the sinner, in the least. His ill desert is according to his whole 
moral character, according to what he is, and has done, as a moral agent; he may 
justly be treated according to this. And to treat him thus, would be doing him no 
injury. Therefore not to treat him according to his moral character, but to treat 
him better and more favourably, is mere grace and undeserved favour. The sufferings 
of Christ, therefore, do not make the least alteration, or any abatement of his 
ill desert, as the sinner’s own character is not hereby made better.</p>
<pb n="422" id="iv.iii-Page_422" />
<p class="normal" id="iv.iii-p107">If the sinner were to suffer the penalty himself, in his own person; 
and were able to do this, and survive his suffering; this would alter his moral 
character, as he would then have completely compensated for his crime, it being 
extinguished by his suffering all the evil which it deserves; no more could be required, 
or justly inflicted upon him. His whole character being considered, his crimes and 
sufferings, he would stand right in law, and have no need of a pardon, and there 
would be no grace in not punishing him yet more. The vicarious sufferings of a substitute 
are quite different, and opposite, in this respect, to the sufferings of the sinner, 
which have been supposed, though really impossible. For in the case of vicarious 
sufferings, the sinner’s character remains the same, and he continues as ill deserving 
as ever, and must feel so, if his discerning and feeling be according to truth. 
Had Adam persevered in obedience, to the end of the time of his trial, by his vicarious 
obedience, all his children would have been admitted to the enjoyment of the favour 
of God, and eternal life; but this vicarious obedience of their substitute would 
not have rendered them in the least degree more deserving of such favour, than if 
there had been no such obedience. For Adam’s obedience was not their own personal 
obedience, and never could be; and therefore could not be considered as such. So 
the sufferings of Christ, not being the sufferings of the sinner, but of a substitute, 
cannot render the sinner less ill deserving in himself, or personally considered, 
more than the vicarious obedience of a substitute can render those for whom he obeys 
more worthy of reward.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.iii-p108">The husband’s suffering for his wife, the punishment which she 
deserved, may serve to illustrate this point. His suffering did not render her in 
the least less deserving of punishment, as it did not alter her character; and it 
was as much an act of mere grace to pardon her, as if her husband had not suffered. 
The end that his suffering answered, was to open the way for her pardon, consistent 
with public justice, and the general good; and not to reader her the less ill deserving.</p>
<pb n="423" id="iv.iii-Page_423" />
<p class="normal" id="iv.iii-p109"><span class="sc" id="iv.iii-p109.1">Ques</span>. 8. <span class="sc" id="iv.iii-p109.2">Would</span> 
it not have been a higher exercise of mercy and grace to save sinners without an 
atonement; without buying and redeeming them at so great a price? Many have thought 
that the doctrine of an atonement stated above, as necessary m order to the exercise 
of divine grace, in pardoning and saving sinners, gives a dishonourable notion of 
the goodness of God, and represents his mercy unspeakably less, than it would appear 
to be, if sinners were forgiven and saved, without any price paid for their redemption, 
or atonement made for their sins.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.iii-p110"><span class="sc" id="iv.iii-p110.1">Ans</span>. If the nature and design of an atonement 
be well understood, and kept in mind, as it has been stated and represented in the 
beginning of this chapter, it will appear that the benevolence and grace of God, 
in saving sinners without an atonement, were this consistent with rectitude and 
wisdom, would have been unspeakably less, than that which is now exercised in the 
redemption of sinners by the atonement of Christ; this being necessary to render 
their salvation possible, consistent with righteousness, truth, and goodness itself. 
Indeed, as the case was, there would have been no grace in pardoning sinners, and 
saving them without an atonement, for this would have been contrary to infinite 
goodness. A full answer to this question is found in the first chapter of this part.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.iii-p111">Having considered the atonement which it was necessary for the 
Redeemer to make by his own sufferings, in order to redeem man; and which he has 
actually made by suffering the penalty of the law, which was the greatest, and most 
difficult part of his work, as the Redeemer of men, it must in the next place be 
observed,</p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.iii-p112">II. The work of the Redeemer consists, in part, in his perfect 
obedience to the law of God. This is an essential part of the character and work 
of the Redeemer of man; for he could not directly honour the precepts of the law 
in any way, or by any thing, but by obeying them; and the least instance of disobedience 
or disregard to any one of them would have ruined his character as the Redeemer 
of man.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.iii-p113">The Son of God, united to the human nature, and considered as 
God and man in one person, was not under <pb n="424" id="iv.iii-Page_424" />any original obligation to 
that obedience which he voluntarily took upon himself to perform. This divine person 
was above any obligation to obedience, as a subject and servant. He was, in the 
human nature, perfectly holy, as God is holy; but this he might be, and continue 
so forever, and yet not be under obligation to yield the obedience to which he submitted. 
The Son of God did not take upon him the form of a servant, merely by becoming man, 
by being made flesh, and taking the human nature into a personal union; but as he 
became flesh, and was made in the likeness of men, that hereby he might be capable 
of obeying and suffering in the human nature, he voluntarily <i>took upon himself</i> 
the form of a servant, and being found in fashion as a man, <i>he humbled himself, 
and became obedient unto death</i>.<note n="451" id="iv.iii-p113.1"><p class="normal" id="iv.iii-p114"><scripRef id="iv.iii-p114.1" passage="Phil. ii. 7" parsed="|Phil|2|7|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Phil.2.7">Phil. ii. 7</scripRef>, <scripRef passage="Phil 2:8" id="iv.iii-p114.2" parsed="|Phil|2|8|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Phil.2.8">8</scripRef>. The words in our translation 
are, “He took upon him the form of a servant, and was found in the likeness of men.” 
But it is more agreeable to the original, to render it thus: <i>Being made in the 
likeness of man</i>; (or as Dr. Doddridge translates it, “When made in the likeness 
of men”) <i>he took upon him</i> the form of a servant.</p></note> “When the fulness 
of time was come, God sent forth his Son, made of a woman, <i>made under the law</i>.”<note n="452" id="iv.iii-p114.3"><p class="normal" id="iv.iii-p115">
<scripRef id="iv.iii-p115.1" passage="Gal. iv. 4" parsed="|Gal|4|4|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Gal.4.4">Gal. iv. 4</scripRef>.</p></note> The Son of God being made of a woman, that is, being made flesh, 
and becoming man, uniting himself to the human nature, did not necessarily put him 
under the law, or lay him under obligation to obey it, as a subject, or servant, 
or to suffer the penalty of it. Therefore, the apostle, in these words, distinguishes 
between these; he was not only made of a woman, took the human nature into a personal 
union with himself; but was also <i>made under the law</i>. When he was originally 
above law, or any obligation to obedience, he voluntarily took the place of sinners, 
and was made under the law, and became obliged to suffer the penalty, and obey the 
precepts of it, “to redeem them that were under the law, and under the curse of 
it, and that they might receive the adoption of sons.” It was necessary that he 
should suffer the curse of the law, to redeem men from the curse of it; and it was 
equally necessary that he should obey the precepts of the law, in man’s stead, that 
believers in him might receive the adoption of sons, and obtain complete deliverance 
from sin, and become heirs of eternal life.</p>
<pb n="425" id="iv.iii-Page_425" />
<p class="normal" id="iv.iii-p116">The atonement made by Christ, in his suffering the penalty of 
the law, has respect only to the threatening of the law, that by suffering what 
was threatened, and what sin deserves, sinners who believe in him might be delivered 
from the curse. Thus Christ died <i>for sin</i>; was sacrificed or offered <i>to 
bear the sins of many</i>; and he shed his blood <i>for the remission of sins</i>, 
as the scripture asserts. This atonement therefore only delivers from the curse 
of the law, and procures the remission of their sins who believe in him; but does 
not procure for them any positive good: It leaves them under the power of sin, and 
without any title to eternal life, or any positive favour, or actual fitness or 
capacity to enjoy positive happiness. This would be but a very partial redemption, 
had the Redeemer done no more than merely to make atonement for sin, by suffering 
the penalty of the law for sinners, and in their stead. It was therefore necessary 
that he should obey the precepts of the law for man, and in his stead, that by his 
perfect and meritorious obedience, he might honour the law in the preceptive part 
of it, and obtain all the positive favour and benefits which man needed, be they 
ever so many and great.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.iii-p117">It has been observed, that when man was first created, it was 
made known by the Legislator, that his law admitted of <i>vicarious</i> obedience; 
that the obedience of one might be the proper ground of granting the greatest favours 
to all whom he represented, and for whom, and in whose stead he acted. This he did 
by constituting Adam a public and federal head of his posterity, and substituting 
him to act for them all, so that by his obedience through the time of his trial, 
his children should obtain eternal life. If this were proper and wise, and consistent 
with the exercise of the most perfect moral government, and with the true design 
and spirit of the moral law, as it most certainly was; then there is equal propriety 
and wisdom in substituting the second public head, the Redeemer of men, to act, 
to obey, for all the redeemed, who shall believe in him, so that they shall have 
as. much favour, at least, as if they had performed perfect obedience in their own 
persons. The obedience of the second Adam, the Son of God, must be infinitely 
<pb n="426" id="iv.iii-Page_426" />more worthy of regard, and meritorious, than the obedience of the 
first Adam, for two reasons.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.iii-p118">1. He was infinitely greater and more excellent, and worthy, than 
Adam was. Therefore his obedience was proportionally more excellent, meritorious 
and pleasing to God. And it was proportionally more honourable to the law, which 
he obeyed, and to the Legislator and divine government. It may be truly said, that 
the obedience of Christ to the divine law had more excellence and worth in it, than 
the highest, most perfect and all possible obedience of all the mere creatures in 
the universe; and the law of God is unspeakably more dignified and honoured in the 
precepts of it, by the former, than it can be by the latter.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.iii-p119">2dly. The obedience of Adam, the first public head, was but a 
just debt which he owed to God, for himself, in his own person. The law required 
perfect obedience of him; he was under indispensable obligation to this every moment 
of his existence: Therefore it was impossible for him to merit any thing by doing 
more than his duty, while he gave himself wholly to God, in the strongest love of 
which he was capable, and in the highest and most difficult acts of obedience; he 
gave no more than he owed, as an original and just debt, arising from his existence 
and capacity, as a creature of God. But the Son of God, as has been observed, was 
under no obligation to obey as he did, as a subject and servant: he owed nothing 
of this nature for himself, he being above all law, in this respect, until he voluntarily 
took upon him the form of a servant, and put himself under the law, not only to 
suffer the penalty of it, not for himself, but for others; but to obey it, not for 
himself, as if he owed such obedience, but for others, that they might have the 
benefit of it. In this respect, the obedience of the Redeemer was in the highest 
sense and degree worthy of reward, and meritorious for himself and those for whom 
he obeyed. All the glory, which is the consequence of his obedience and sufferings, 
and all the positive good to himself, and his church, is the reward of the Redeemer, 
and of the redeemed with him. Because he took upon him the form of a servant, and 
was obedient unto death: Therefore God hath <pb n="427" id="iv.iii-Page_427" />highly exalted him, and 
given him a name, which is above every name.”<note n="453" id="iv.iii-p119.1"><p class="normal" id="iv.iii-p120"><scripRef id="iv.iii-p120.1" passage="Phil. ii. 7" parsed="|Phil|2|7|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Phil.2.7">Phil. ii. 7</scripRef>, <scripRef passage="Phil 2:8" id="iv.iii-p120.2" parsed="|Phil|2|8|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Phil.2.8">8</scripRef>, <scripRef passage="Phil 2:9" id="iv.iii-p120.3" parsed="|Phil|2|9|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Phil.2.9">9</scripRef>.</p></note> The 
Lord is well pleased for his righteousness sake, and hath delivered all things into 
his hands, and made him head over all things to the church, to complete the redemption 
of it, and give eternal life to as many as were given to him.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.iii-p121">In this view it may be said that the reward of the obedience of 
the Son of God is infinitely greater than that which the first Adam would have obtained, 
had he obeyed. The Redeemer has by his obedience obtained unspeakably greater good, 
happiness and glory, for his church, the redeemed, than the obedience of Adam would 
have procured for his posterity. Speaking of the redeemed, he says, “I am come that 
they might have life, <i>and that they might have it more abundantly</i>.”<note n="454" id="iv.iii-p121.1"><p class="normal" id="iv.iii-p122">
<scripRef id="iv.iii-p122.1" passage="John x. 10" parsed="|John|10|10|0|0" osisRef="Bible:John.10.10">John x. 10</scripRef>.</p></note> 
They are raised up to sit with him, even on his throne, to reign with him, as kings 
and priests, sharing with him in his felicity and glory. All this is the fruit and 
reward of the obedience of the Mediator. The redeemed enjoy the benefit of his obedience 
as much as if they themselves had performed it, or it were their own obedience, 
though they, in themselves, in their own persons, are as unworthy as if Christ had 
not obeyed the law for them.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.iii-p123">The obedience of Christ, though most excellent and meritorious, 
is not an atonement for the sins of men, or really any part of it. It is impossible 
that any mere obedience, however excellent and meritorious, should make atonement 
for the least sin. This can be done by nothing but suffering the penalty of the 
law, the evil with which transgression is threatened, as has been shown, while attending 
to the sufferings of Christ.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.iii-p124">Christ did, indeed, obey in suffering; and this was, perhaps, 
the highest act or instance of his obedience. As a servant he received a commandment 
from the Father to lay down his life to make atonement for the sins of men. This 
was the most difficult part, and the greatest trial of his obedience. He set his 
face as a flint, and went through the whole with a persevering steadiness and resolution; 
and in this was the strongest exercise and expression of his love to God and man, <pb n="428" id="iv.iii-Page_428" />
and regard for the law of God, and the divine government. And this was therefore 
the most pleasing to God, and the most meritorious part of his obedience, when he 
“became obedient unto death, even the death of the cross;” as it was also the greatest 
instance of his suffering, in which the atonement which he made by suffering, chiefly 
consisted. And it was necessary that his suffering should be voluntary, and so an 
act of obedience, as far as he was active, in order to his suffering justly, and 
making any atonement thereby. But though the Redeemer <i>obeyed in sufferings</i>, 
and suffered in obeying; and his highest and most meritorious obedience was acted 
out in his voluntary suffering unto death, and in this greatest instance of his 
suffering, the atonement which he made for sin chiefly consisted; yet his obedience 
and suffering are two perfectly distinct things, and answered different ends; and 
must be considered so, and the distinction and difference carefully, and with clearness 
kept up in the mind, in order to have a proper understanding of this very important 
subject. The sufferings of Christ, as such, made atonement for sin, as he suffered 
the penalty of the law, or the curse of it, the evil threatened to transgression, 
and which is the desert of it, in the sinner’s stead; by which he opened the way 
for sinners being delivered from the curse, and laid the foundation for reconciliation 
between God, and the transgressors, by his not imputing, but pardoning their sins, 
who believe in the Redeemer, and approve of his character and conduct. By the obedience 
of Christ all the positive good, all those favours and blessings are merited and 
obtained, which sinners need, in order to enjoy complete and eternal redemption, 
or everlasting life in the kingdom of God. By this he has purchased and obtained 
the Holy Spirit, by whom sinners are so far recovered from total depravity, and 
renewed, as to be prepared and disposed to believe on Christ and receive him, being 
offered to them: And he carries on a work of sanctification in their hearts, until 
they are perfectly holy. Therefore Christ says, he will send and give the Holy Spirit, 
and he Father will send him in his name: and he is called the Spirit of Christ, 
“If I go not away, the Comforter will not come unto you; but if I depart, <pb n="429" id="iv.iii-Page_429" />
<i>I will send him unto you</i>. And when he is -come, he will reprove the world 
of sin, and of righteousness, and of judgment. The Comforter, the Holy Ghost, whom 
the Father will send <i>in my name</i>, he shall teach you all things. When the 
Comforter is come, whom <i>I will send unto you</i> from the Father, even the Spirit 
of Truth, which proceedeth from the Father, he shall testify of me.”<note n="455" id="iv.iii-p124.1"><p class="normal" id="iv.iii-p125"><scripRef id="iv.iii-p125.1" passage="John xiv. 26" parsed="|John|14|26|0|0" osisRef="Bible:John.14.26">John 
xiv. 26</scripRef>. <scripRef passage="John 15:26" id="iv.iii-p125.2" parsed="|John|15|26|0|0" osisRef="Bible:John.15.26">xv. 26</scripRef>. <scripRef passage="John 16:7,8" id="iv.iii-p125.3" parsed="|John|16|7|16|8" osisRef="Bible:John.16.7-John.16.8">
xvi. 7, 8</scripRef>.</p></note> “If any man have not <i>the Spirit of Christ</i>, he 
is none of his.”<note n="456" id="iv.iii-p125.4"><p class="normal" id="iv.iii-p126"><scripRef id="iv.iii-p126.1" passage="Rom. viii. 19" parsed="|Rom|8|19|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Rom.8.19">Rom. viii. 19</scripRef>.</p></note> This gift of the Holy Ghost really 
comprises all positive good which Christ has by his obedience purchased for the 
redeemed. And as “Christ is the end of the law for righteousness to every one that 
believeth,”<note n="457" id="iv.iii-p126.2"><p class="normal" id="iv.iii-p127"><scripRef id="iv.iii-p127.1" passage="Rom. x. 4" parsed="|Rom|10|4|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Rom.10.4">Rom. x. 4</scripRef>.</p></note> all such being interested in his righteousness, 
and having the benefit of it as much as if they had in their own persons perfectly 
obeyed the law, have eternal life made sure to them; the Holy Spirit is given to 
them to abide with them forever, as the earnest of their eternal inheritance; and 
they have a divine promise that they shall never perish, but shall persevere in 
holiness, until they are made perfect, “being kept by the power of God, through 
faith unto salvation.” All which favours they receive by the obedience and merit 
or righteousness of Christ, which is imputed to them, or avails to procure all these 
benefits for them, in consequence of their union to him by faith. But these matters 
will be more fully considered in some of the following chapters.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.iii-p128">Before this head is dismissed, it may be useful to observe the 
following things. Though there be a real distinction between the atonement which 
is made by Christ for sin by suffering; and his obedience, by which sinners who 
believe in him are recommended to all the positive blessings, which they want, and 
are bestowed on them; yet both these are generally included and meant by the righteousness 
of Christ; but a principal respect seems to be had to the latter, and sometimes 
perhaps that only is intended. He who reads the Bible with care will take notice 
of this. The righteousness of Christ does most properly consist in his obedience, 
by which believers in him obtain eternal life, and all positive blessings; yet as 
his obedience implies his sufferings, and <pb n="430" id="iv.iii-Page_430" />his sufferings imply his 
obedience, and one is as necessary for the salvation of men as the other, they are 
both included in his righteousness; as they are both necessarily included in <i>
his obedience unto death</i>.<note n="458" id="iv.iii-p128.1"><p class="normal" id="iv.iii-p129"><scripRef id="iv.iii-p129.1" passage="Phil. ii. 8" parsed="|Phil|2|8|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Phil.2.8">Phil. ii. 8</scripRef>.</p></note></p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.iii-p130">It maybe farther observed, that to be justified by Christ, sometimes 
means only a being pardoned, or deliverance from the curse of the law by the sufferings 
and atonement of Christ, or has a principal respect to that; though it includes 
positive favour, and a title to eternal life, which are given to believers, for 
the sake of the obedience and worthiness of Christ. Pardon of sin, or deliverance 
from the evil which sin deserves, is distinguishable from what is called “justification 
of life,”<note n="459" id="iv.iii-p130.1"><p class="normal" id="iv.iii-p131"><scripRef id="iv.iii-p131.1" passage="Rom. v. 18" parsed="|Rom|5|18|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Rom.5.18">Rom. v. 18</scripRef>.</p></note> which implies a tide to eternal life, though 
these are never separated; for he who is pardoned, is by one and the same act of 
God, also made heir of eternal life, including all the favours which the believer 
receives for the sake of the worthiness and obedience of Christ; and is treated 
as well as if he were perfectly righteous, out of respect to the obedience and righteousness 
of the Redeemer. The following seem to be instances in which to <i>justify</i>, 
or be justified, intends only forgiveness of sins on account of the sufferings or 
atonement of Christ; or, at least, to have a primary and chief respect to that—“Be 
it known unto you, men and brethren, that through this man is preached unto you
<i>the forgiveness of sins</i>: And by him all that believe <i>are justified from 
all things, from which ye could not be justified by the law of Moses</i>.”<note n="460" id="iv.iii-p131.2"><p class="normal" id="iv.iii-p132">
<scripRef id="iv.iii-p132.1" passage="Acts xiii. 38" parsed="|Acts|13|38|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Acts.13.38">Acts xiii. 38</scripRef>, <scripRef passage="Acts 13:39" id="iv.iii-p132.2" parsed="|Acts|13|39|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Acts.13.39">39</scripRef>.</p></note> “Much more then being now justified by his blood, 
we shall be saved from wrath through him.”<note n="461" id="iv.iii-p132.3"><p class="normal" id="iv.iii-p133"><scripRef id="iv.iii-p133.1" passage="Rom. v. 9" parsed="|Rom|5|9|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Rom.5.9">Rom. v. 9</scripRef>.</p></note> Here justification 
seems to mean no more than pardon of sin, or rather opening the way to pardon by 
the suffering and death of Christ in their stead, Christ having died for them.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.iii-p134">Redemption seems also to be sometimes used in a more restrained 
sense, and primarily, if not wholly respects deliverance from the curse of the law 
by the sufferings of Christ, or forgiveness of sins through the atonement he has 
made by suffering the curse of the law. The following appear to be instances of 
this: “In whom we have <i>redemption through his blood, the forgiveness of </i><pb n="431" id="iv.iii-Page_431" />
<i>sins</i>.”<note n="462" id="iv.iii-p134.1"><p class="normal" id="iv.iii-p135"><scripRef id="iv.iii-p135.1" passage="Eph. i. 7" parsed="|Eph|1|7|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Eph.1.7">Eph. i. 7</scripRef>.</p></note> “Christ hath <i>redeemed</i> us from the curse 
of the law, being made a curse for us.”<note n="463" id="iv.iii-p135.2"><p class="normal" id="iv.iii-p136"><scripRef id="iv.iii-p136.1" passage="Gal. iii. 13" parsed="|Gal|3|13|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Gal.3.13">Gal. iii. 13</scripRef>.</p></note> Yet this includes, 
and is connected with deliverance from sin and all evil, and the bestowment of eternal 
life, and comprehends the whole work of the Redeemer.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.iii-p137">III. Another part of the work of the Redeemer, is to complete 
the salvation of those whom he redeems, and to finish and perfect the work of redemption. 
This has been in some measure brought into view under the former head, but requires 
a more particular consideration. In consequence of the suffering and obedience of 
Christ, and as a reward of the latter, he is exalted, to give repentance and remission 
of sins, and complete salvation to those who shall be actually redeemed. All things 
are given into his hands, and all power in heaven and earth: And he is made head 
over all things to the church; that he might sanctify and cleanse it, and present 
it to himself a glorious church, not having spot or wrinkle, or any such thing; 
but that it should be holy, and without blemish. As all men are naturally in a state 
of total depravity, enemies to God, his law and government; and therefore enemies 
to the Redeemer, and all his designs and works; not one of them can be persuaded 
to come to him, and accept of the offered salvation, unless he be made willing by 
his mighty power, renewing his heart, taking away the heart of stone, the rebellious 
heart, and giving a discerning, obedient heart. This is represented in the scripture 
by a variety of phrases, and abundantly asserted, which may be more fully considered 
in a following chapter. The Redeemer having renewed by the spirit, those whom he 
designs to save, so far as to bring them to a union with himself by faith, and to 
become his real friends, carries on this work through life, until they are brought 
at death to perfection in holiness; and he will raise their bodies at the last day, 
and give them eternal life. All this he has declared he will do. He has said, “All that the Father giveth me, <i>shall come to me</i>, and him that cometh to 
me, I will in no wise cast out. This is the will of the Father, which hath sent 
me, that of all which he hath given me, I should lose nothing, but should raise <pb n="432" id="iv.iii-Page_432" />
it up again at the last day. And this is the will of him that sent me, that every 
one which seeth the Son and believeth on him, <i>may have everlasting life</i>, 
and I will raise him up at the last day.”<note n="464" id="iv.iii-p137.1"><p class="normal" id="iv.iii-p138"><scripRef id="iv.iii-p138.1" passage="John vi. 37" parsed="|John|6|37|0|0" osisRef="Bible:John.6.37">John vi. 37</scripRef>, <scripRef passage="John 6:39" id="iv.iii-p138.2" parsed="|John|6|39|0|0" osisRef="Bible:John.6.39">39</scripRef>, <scripRef passage="John 6:40" id="iv.iii-p138.3" parsed="|John|6|40|0|0" osisRef="Bible:John.6.40">40</scripRef>.</p></note></p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.iii-p139">He is exalted to the right hand of God, and sits on the throne 
of the universe, having all things in his hands, and governing the whole world, 
so as in the best manner to save the redeemed, and fulfil the good pleasure of his 
goodness towards them, and totally to disappoint, overthrow and destroy all his 
and their enemies, putting them under his feet, when he will come to judge the world 
in righteousness.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.iii-p140">The Redeemer, in prosecuting his work, sustains the character, 
and performs the offices of prophet, priest and king. He is, in the moral world, 
especially in his church and kingdom, what the sun is in the natural world, the 
light thereof. He is therefore called “the Sun of righteousness.” He said, “I am 
the light of the world: He that followeth me, shall not walk in darkness, but shall 
have the light of life. I am come a light into the world, that whosoever believeth 
on me, should not abide in darkness.”<note n="465" id="iv.iii-p140.1"><p class="normal" id="iv.iii-p141"><scripRef id="iv.iii-p141.1" passage="John viii. 12" parsed="|John|8|12|0|0" osisRef="Bible:John.8.12">John viii. 12</scripRef>. <scripRef passage="John 12:46" id="iv.iii-p141.2" parsed="|John|12|46|0|0" osisRef="Bible:John.12.46">
xii. 46</scripRef>. These words of Christ serve to explain what is said by this 
Evangelist, [<scripRef passage="John 1:5" id="iv.iii-p141.3" parsed="|John|1|5|0|0" osisRef="Bible:John.1.5">Chap. i. 5</scripRef>.] “Who was the true 
light, which lighteth every man that cometh into the world.” The words of Christ 
suppose, and implicitly assert, that he who believeth not, is in darkness, and abideth 
in darkness. And this Apostle asserts the same thing. He says, “He that hateth his 
brother (which is true of every unbeliever) is in darkness, and walketh in darkness, 
because that darkness hath blinded his eyes.” [<scripRef id="iv.iii-p141.4" passage="1 John 2" parsed="|1John|2|0|0|0" osisRef="Bible:1John.2">1 John 2</scripRef>.] Therefore Christ’s <i>
lightening every man that cometh into the world</i>, cannot mean that he actually 
illuminates the mind of every man in the world, for the words of Christ, and of 
his beloved disciple, assert the contrary. The meaning therefore must be, either 
that he lightens every man in the world without exception, <i>who has any true light</i>; 
that is, all who believe, and come to the light: Or that he is the only objective 
light in the world; there being no other light to be seen, but that which he affords 
objectively: which objective light is set before all men, and is offered to all, 
in a greater or less degree. It nevertheless remains true that all who are not christians, 
and do not follow Christ, have no light within them, but walk in total darkness, 
from which they are turned when they believe. Therefore Christ says, “I am the light 
of the world. He that followeth me, shall not walk in darkness, but shall have the 
light of life.” [<scripRef id="iv.iii-p141.5" passage="John viii. 12" parsed="|John|8|12|0|0" osisRef="Bible:John.8.12">John viii. 12</scripRef>] This implies that all who do not follow him, have 
no degree of that light of which he speaks, when he says, “I am the light of the 
world;” but are wholly involved in that darkness which is opposed to this light; 
and live and walk in it.</p></note></p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.iii-p142">The Redeemer is the author of all the moral light and instruction 
afforded to men. He has given the divine <pb n="453" id="iv.iii-Page_453" />revelation which we enjoy. 
He inspired men by his Spirit to write that part of scripture which the church enjoyed 
before his incarnation.<note n="466" id="iv.iii-p142.1"><p class="normal" id="iv.iii-p143"><scripRef id="iv.iii-p143.1" passage="1 Pet. i. 11" parsed="|1Pet|1|11|0|0" osisRef="Bible:1Pet.1.11">1 Pet. i. 11</scripRef>.</p></note> He taught and instructed men 
when in the flesh on earth; and inspired the apostles and others to write what is 
contained in the New Testament, in which, among other things, all the future, grand 
events, that relate to his church and kingdom, and to the world of mankind in general, 
which are to take place to the end of the world, are foretold; and by all which 
life and immortality are brought to light. And he opens the eyes of blind sinners, 
and turns them from darkness to marvellous light, causing the light of truth contained 
in divine revelation to shine in their hearts. And he forms the hearts of his disciples 
more and more to true discerning, till they are cured of all their mistakes and 
darkness, and brought into perfect light and day. In order to this he has instituted 
and maintains all the external means of instruction and knowledge; with reference 
to which St. Paul says, “When he ascended up on high, he led captivity captive, 
and gave gifts unto men. And he gave some Apostles, and some Prophets, and some 
Evangelists, and some Pastors and Teachers, for the perfecting of the saints, for 
the work of the ministry, for the edifying of the body of Christ; till we all come
<i>in the unity of the faith, and of the knowledge of the Son of God</i>, unto a 
perfect man, unto the measure of the stature of the fulness of Christ.”<note n="467" id="iv.iii-p143.2"><p class="normal" id="iv.iii-p144"><scripRef id="iv.iii-p144.1" passage="Eph. iv. 9" parsed="|Eph|4|9|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Eph.4.9">Eph. 
iv. 9</scripRef>, <scripRef passage="Eph 4:12" id="iv.iii-p144.2" parsed="|Eph|4|12|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Eph.4.12">12</scripRef>, <scripRef passage="Eph 4:13" id="iv.iii-p144.3" parsed="|Eph|4|13|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Eph.4.13">13</scripRef>.</p></note></p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.iii-p145">And he not only exerciseth the office of a prophet till he has 
brought his church to a state of perfect light and knowledge, but he will sustain 
this character in heaven forever: For the Lamb shall be the <i>everlasting light 
of it</i>.<note n="468" id="iv.iii-p145.1"><p class="normal" id="iv.iii-p146"><scripRef id="iv.iii-p146.1" passage="Rev. xxi. 22" parsed="|Rev|21|22|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Rev.21.22">Rev. xxi. 22</scripRef>. <scripRef passage="Isa 10:19" id="iv.iii-p146.2" parsed="|Isa|10|19|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Isa.10.19">Isai. x. 19</scripRef>.</p></note> 
He will make new discoveries, and give increasing light and knowledge without any 
end. The Redeemer therefore is promised in the character of a prophet, when his 
incarnation is foretold. “For Moses truly said unto the fathers, a prophet 
shall the Lord your God raise up unto you, of your brethren, like unto me.”<note n="469" id="iv.iii-p146.3"><p class="normal" id="iv.iii-p147">
<scripRef id="iv.iii-p147.1" passage="Acts iii. 22" parsed="|Acts|3|22|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Acts.3.22">Acts iii. 22</scripRef>. <scripRef passage="Deut 18:15" id="iv.iii-p147.2" parsed="|Deut|18|15|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Deut.18.15">Deut. xviii. 15</scripRef>.</p></note></p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.iii-p148">Christ is also a <span class="sc" id="iv.iii-p148.1">priest</span> in his church. 
The great high priest, of whom all the priests, constituted by the laws of God given 
to Moses, were types. He has offered <pb n="434" id="iv.iii-Page_434" />the only sacrifice, by which 
full atonement is made for sin. And in this transaction, he is both the priest, 
the sacrifice, and the altar. And though by his <i>once</i> offering himself a sacrifice 
for the sins of his people, he has made complete atonement for sin; yet he continues 
to exercise the office of the priest, and u ill do so forever. “He is made an high 
priest <i>forever</i>, after the order of Melchisedec. Because he ever liveth, he 
hath an <i>unchangeable</i> priesthood. Wherefore he is able also to save them to 
the uttermost, that come unto God by him, s<i>eeing he ever liveth to make intercession 
for them</i>.”<note n="470" id="iv.iii-p148.2"><p class="normal" id="iv.iii-p149"><scripRef id="iv.iii-p149.1" passage="Heb. vi. 20" parsed="|Heb|6|20|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Heb.6.20">Heb. vi. 20</scripRef>, <scripRef passage="Heb 7:24,25" id="iv.iii-p149.2" parsed="|Heb|7|24|7|25" osisRef="Bible:Heb.7.24-Heb.7.25">vii. 24, 25</scripRef>.</p></note> 
Therefore he appears on the throne in heaven, as a Lamb that had been slain, and 
is represented as entering and remaining there with his own blood. The atonement 
of Christ, which he has made by his blood, for the sins of the redeemed, and his 
meritorious obedience, and the consequent intercession which he will forever make 
for them, will be their everlasting security from wrath and destruction, and for 
their enjoyment of the divine favour, and eternal life, as their ill desert, in 
their own persons, and in themselves considered, will remain without the least diminution 
forever. Therefore the Redeemer continues a high priest forever, and because he 
ever lives to make intercession for his people, they shall live also, eternally 
dependent on his atonement, merit, and worthiness, for safety from evil, and for 
all the good which they enjoy. “Behold the man whose name is the branch, and he 
shall grow up out of his place, and he shall build the temple of the Lord: (that 
is, the church.) Even he shall build the temple of the Lord, and he shall bear the 
glory, and shall sit and rule upon his throne, <i>and he shall be a </i>
<span class="sc" id="iv.iii-p149.3">Priest </span><i>upon his throne</i>.”<note n="471" id="iv.iii-p149.4"><p class="normal" id="iv.iii-p150"><scripRef id="iv.iii-p150.1" passage="Zech. vi. 12" parsed="|Zech|6|12|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Zech.6.12">Zech. vi. 12</scripRef>, <scripRef passage="Zech 6:13" id="iv.iii-p150.2" parsed="|Zech|6|13|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Zech.6.13">13</scripRef>.</p></note> 
He will continue in the office of a priest, as long as he shall sit upon his throne, 
and his kingdom lasts, which shall be forever. This leads farther to observe,</p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.iii-p151">Jesus Christ, in the work of redemption, acts in the character 
of ruler and king. He is a prophet, and a priest <i>upon his throne</i>. He exerciseth 
the authority of a king. This is abundantly asserted in scripture. “I have set my 
king upon my holy hill of Zion.”<note n="472" id="iv.iii-p151.1"><p class="normal" id="iv.iii-p152"><scripRef id="iv.iii-p152.1" passage="Ps. ii. 6" parsed="|Ps|2|6|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Ps.2.6">Ps. ii. 6</scripRef>.</p></note> “My heart is inditing a 
good matter: I speak of the things 
<pb n="435" id="iv.iii-Page_435" />which I have made touching <i>the king</i>.”<note n="473" id="iv.iii-p152.2"><p class="normal" id="iv.iii-p153"><scripRef id="iv.iii-p153.1" passage="Ps. xlv. 1" parsed="|Ps|45|1|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Ps.45.1">Ps. xlv. 1</scripRef>.</p></note> 
He is <i>the king</i>, by way of eminence. He ib King of kings, and Lord of lords. 
He has supreme authority as legislator in his church. He has made institutions and 
laws which are binding on his people, they being obliged implicitly to obey his 
commands in all things. And he is <i>the only</i> lawgiver. And as all men are naturally 
in a state of rebellion, and enemies to God, he not only commands them to repent 
and submit to him; but he effectually conquers and subdues all those who become 
his willing subjects, by a powerful operation on their hearts, changing a; id renewing 
them, and bringing them to a cordial obedience to him. Thus his people are all
<i>made willing in the day of his power</i>. He protects his church and people from 
all their enemies, and from all harm; and gradually removes all the disaffection 
to him in their hearts, until they are all brought to a most cheerful, perfect obedience 
to him, and his throne is established in their hearts, and he rules there without 
a competitor. And he rules in the midst of his enemies. They are all under his powder 
and control, and he restrains, guides and governs them, so that they cannot cross 
and impede his designs, or do the least hurt to his interest and kingdom, however 
much they may desire and attempt it; but he uses them all to promote and answer 
his own ends. The wrath of man shall praise him: and the remainder of wrath he will 
restrain.<note n="474" id="iv.iii-p153.2"><p class="normal" id="iv.iii-p154"><scripRef id="iv.iii-p154.1" passage="Ps. lxxvi. 10" parsed="|Ps|76|10|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Ps.76.10">Ps. lxxvi. 10</scripRef>.</p></note> And he will finally subdue all his enemies, 
and put them under his feet.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.iii-p155">The Redeemer now reigns over all. All things are delivered into 
his hands; both angels, men, and devils are in his hand, and under his direction 
and control: Yea, all creatures and things, visible and invisible, in the whole 
created universe, both greater and less, are sustained and guided by him, in all 
their various circumstances and motions; and he is ordering and using them to answer 
his own ends, as King of Zion, and head over all things to the church. In the mean 
time he is forming his church, and will not cease working till he has made it the 
most perfect, beautiful, happy and glorious society and kingdom, that infinite power, 
wisdom and goodness can produce; which shall stand and flourish <pb n="436" id="iv.iii-Page_436" />forever, 
as a monument to display all these: and in which his boundless, wonderful love and 
grace, in the redemption of man, and his unchangeable truth and faithfulness, shall 
be celebrated without end, and with increasing admiration and praise.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.iii-p156">In the exercise of his kingly office, when all the redeemed are 
brought into his kingdom, and the number of his church is completed, he will appear 
and sit as judge of all moral agents; will raise the dead; and cause all the angels 
and devils, and all mankind to stand before his tribunal; and when the moral character 
of every one shall be properly examined and displayed, he will, as king and the 
final judge of all, pronounce the blessed sentence on the redeemed, admitting them 
as the happy members of his eternal kingdom: And he will sentence all those of mankind 
u ho shall then appear not to have been his friends in this world, to endless punishment, 
with the devil and his angels.<note n="475" id="iv.iii-p156.1"><p class="normal" id="iv.iii-p157"><scripRef id="iv.iii-p157.1" passage="Matthew xxv. 31-46" parsed="|Matt|25|31|25|46" osisRef="Bible:Matt.25.31-Matt.25.46">Matthew xxv. 31-46</scripRef>.</p></note> And having thus 
completed the work of redemption, by gathering the redeemed into his kingdom; and 
putting all his enemies under his feet, consigning them to deserved, endless punishment, 
he will reign forever in his church, his mediatorial kingdom, which shall have no 
end. That his kingdom is an everlasting kingdom, and the Redeemer shall reign in 
it forever, is abundantly declared in the Scripture. It is needless to cite now 
more than the words of the angel to the virgin Mary. “He shall be great, and shall 
be called the Son of the Highest: And the Lord God shall give unto him the throne 
of his father David. <i>And he shall reign over the house of Jacob forever, and 
of his kingdom there shall be no end</i>.”<note n="476" id="iv.iii-p157.2"><p class="normal" id="iv.iii-p158"><scripRef id="iv.iii-p158.1" passage="Luke i. 32" parsed="|Luke|1|32|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Luke.1.32">Luke i. 32</scripRef>, <scripRef passage="Luke 1:33" id="iv.iii-p158.2" parsed="|Luke|1|33|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Luke.1.33">33</scripRef>.</p></note></p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.iii-p159">What St. Paul says may be thought, at the first view, to be inconsistent 
with this. His words are, “Then cometh the end, <i>when he shall have delivered 
up the kingdom to God, even the Father</i>; when he shall have put down all rule, 
and all authority and power. And when all things shall be subdued unto him, <i>then 
shall the Son also himself be subject unto him that put all things under him</i>, 
that God may be all in all.”<note n="477" id="iv.iii-p159.1"><p class="normal" id="iv.iii-p160"><scripRef id="iv.iii-p160.1" passage="1 Cor. xv. 24" parsed="|1Cor|15|24|0|0" osisRef="Bible:1Cor.15.24">1 Cor. xv. 24</scripRef>, <scripRef passage="1 Cor. 15:28" id="iv.iii-p160.2" parsed="|1Cor|15|28|0|0" osisRef="Bible:1Cor.15.28">28</scripRef>.</p></note> In order to understand 
this passage, and see that it is consistent <pb n="437" id="iv.iii-Page_437" />with other parts of scripture, 
where the Redeemer is said to reign in his kingdom forever, the following things 
must be observed.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.iii-p161">1. In consequence of the Son of God, or second Person in the Trinity, 
undertaking the work of redemption, by becoming the Son of Man, and taking upon 
himself the form of a servant, and doing and suffering ail that was necessary in 
order to effect this, and having actually gone through all this; he was exalted, 
in and by his human nature, and rewarded by having all power, and all things put 
into his hands, and being made head over all things to the church; and is appointed 
the supreme and universal king and governor of the universe, to use and dispose 
of all, so as in the best manner to accomplish and perfect the work of redemption, 
and complete the salvation of the redeemed, and vanquish and totally overthrow all 
his and their enemies, by putting them under his footstool. This must be considered 
as a peculiar kind and degree of power and authority with which he is invested, 
by which he sits on the throne of the universe, and is sole ruler, in the natural 
and moral world, until the ends of this investiture shall be answered; and he has 
finished the work, to accomplish which, he is thus exalted. He will then, when an 
end to this is come, deliver up to the Father this <i>delegated</i> power and kingdom; 
and no longer, as God and man, sit at the right hand of the Father, as supreme ruler 
in the universal kingdom. This leads to observe,</p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.iii-p162">2. When all this is accomplished, the Son of God, being God and 
man, and considered in the character and capacity of Mediator and Redeemer of his 
church, will take his proper place which is assigned to him in the economy of redemption, 
or covenant between the Father and Son; which is not that of supreme ruler and legislator 
in the universal kingdom of God; but in this respect, and in his human nature he 
will be subject to the Father. And then God, the Deity, will be all in all, in a 
higher sense, and more perspicuously, than when the supreme rule was in the hand 
of a person who is a man, and the Son of man. And who made use of the agency and 
offices of angels and men in carrying on <pb n="438" id="iv.iii-Page_438" />his designs, which will then 
all be put down: And who is opposed, and his power and authority disputed by his 
enemies, devils and men, which will then all be subdued, and put out of the way.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.iii-p163">3. The Redeemer will still remain the head of his church, and 
reign forever as king in his mediatorial kingdom; crowned with everlasting honour, 
happiness and glory, of which he will lose nothing by delivering up the kingdom 
to the Father, and being subject to him, in the sense abovementioned. He will be 
admired, praised and glorified by angels and the redeemed forever; and he will be 
their everlasting, unchangeable prophet, priest and king.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.iii-p164">As the covenant between the Father and the Son has been now mentioned, 
it will be proper here to give a brief explanation of that. It is evident from scripture, 
as well as from the nature of the case, that there was a mutual agreement and engagement 
between the Father and the second person of the Trinity respecting the redemption 
of man, by which the distinct part which each person in the Trinity was to act, 
was fixed, and undertaken. This mutual agreement is of the nature of a covenant 
and engagement with each other, to perform the different parts of this great work 
which were assigned to them. This is an eternal covenant, without beginning, as 
is the existence of the triune God, and as are all the divine purposes and decrees. 
The second person was engaged to become incarnate, to do and suffer all that was 
necessary for the salvation of men. The Father promised that on his consenting to 
take upon him the character and work of a Mediator and Redeemer, he should be every 
way furnished and assisted to go through with the work; that he should have power 
to save an elect number of mankind, and form a church and kingdom, most perfect 
and glorious’: In order to accomplish this, all things, all power in heaven and 
earth, should be given to him, until Redemption was completed: And then he should 
reign in the exercise of all his offices, as Mediator, in his church and kingdom 
forever.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.iii-p165">All this is expressed or implied in the representation the Bible 
gives of this affair, in the following passages, <pb n="439" id="iv.iii-Page_439" />as well as others 
which might be mentioned. “I have set my king upon my holy hill of Zion. I will 
declare the decree: The Lord hath said unto me, Thou art my Son, this day have I 
begotten thee. Ask of me, and I will give thee the heathen for thine inheritance, 
and the uttermost parts of the earth for thy possession, &amp;c.”<note n="478" id="iv.iii-p165.1"><p class="normal" id="iv.iii-p166"><scripRef id="iv.iii-p166.1" passage="Psalm ii. 6" parsed="|Ps|2|6|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Ps.2.6">Psalm ii. 6</scripRef>, 
<scripRef passage="Psalm 2:7" id="iv.iii-p166.2" parsed="|Ps|2|7|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Ps.2.7">7</scripRef>, <scripRef passage="Psalm 2:8" id="iv.iii-p166.3" parsed="|Ps|2|8|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Ps.2.8">8</scripRef>.</p></note> Here the Father makes promises, and enters into engagements with the 
Son, which is here called <i>the decree</i>, or covenant. To the same purpose are 
the following words: “The Lord said unto my Lord, Sit thou at my right hand, until 
I make thine enemies thy footstool. The Lord shall send the rod of thy strength 
out of Zion; rule thou in the midst of thine enemies.”<note n="479" id="iv.iii-p166.4"><p class="normal" id="iv.iii-p167"><scripRef id="iv.iii-p167.1" passage="Psalm cx. 1" parsed="|Ps|110|1|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Ps.110.1">Psalm cx. 1</scripRef>, <scripRef passage="Psalm 110:2" id="iv.iii-p167.2" parsed="|Ps|110|2|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Ps.110.2">2</scripRef>.</p></note> 
“Behold my servant whom I uphold, mine elect in whom my soul delighteth: I have 
put my Spirit upon him, he shall bring forth judgment to the Gentiles. I the Lord 
have called thee in righteousness, and I will hold thine hand, and will keep thee, 
and give thee for a covenant of the people, for a light of the Gentiles.”<note n="480" id="iv.iii-p167.3"><p class="normal" id="iv.iii-p168">
<scripRef id="iv.iii-p168.1" passage="Isaiah xlii. 1" parsed="|Isa|42|1|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Isa.42.1">Isaiah xlii. 1</scripRef>, <scripRef passage="Isaiah 42:6" id="iv.iii-p168.2" parsed="|Isa|42|6|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Isa.42.6">6</scripRef>.</p></note> The consent and engagement of the second person is expressed 
in the following words: “Sacrifice and offering thou didst not desire, mine ears 
hast thou opened, (or a body hast thou prepared me.) Burnt offering, and sin offering, 
hast thou not required. Then said I, lo, I come. In the volume of the book it is 
written of me, I delight to do thy will, O my God; yea, thy law is within my heart.”<note n="481" id="iv.iii-p168.3"><p class="normal" id="iv.iii-p169">
<scripRef id="iv.iii-p169.1" passage="Ps. xl. 6" parsed="|Ps|40|6|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Ps.40.6">Ps. xl. 6</scripRef>, <scripRef passage="Ps 40:7" id="iv.iii-p169.2" parsed="|Ps|40|7|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Ps.40.7">7</scripRef>, <scripRef passage="Ps 40:8" id="iv.iii-p169.3" parsed="|Ps|40|8|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Ps.40.8">8</scripRef>.</p></note> Upon this engagement of the Son, “the Father saith unto 
the Son, thy throne, O God, is forever and ever. A sceptre of righteousness is the 
sceptre of thy kingdom. Thou hast loved righteousness, and hated iniquity; therefore 
God, even thy God, hath anointed thee with the oil of gladness above thy fellows.”<note n="482" id="iv.iii-p169.4"><p class="normal" id="iv.iii-p170">
<scripRef id="iv.iii-p170.1" passage="Heb. i. 8" parsed="|Heb|1|8|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Heb.1.8">Heb. i. 8</scripRef>, <scripRef passage="Heb 1:9" id="iv.iii-p170.2" parsed="|Heb|1|9|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Heb.1.9">9</scripRef>. from <scripRef passage="Ps 45:6,7" id="iv.iii-p170.3" parsed="|Ps|45|6|45|7" osisRef="Bible:Ps.45.6-Ps.45.7">Ps. xlv. 6, 7</scripRef>.</p></note> 
The whole of this is comprehended and implied in the following words of our Saviour 
when on earth. “All that the Father hath given me, shall come unto me; and him that 
cometh to me, I will in no wise cast out; for I came down from heaven, not to do 
mine own will, bat the will of him that sent me. And this is the Father’s will who 
hath sent me, that of all which he hath given me, I should lose nothing; but should 
raise it up again <pb n="440" id="iv.iii-Page_440" />at the last day.”<note n="483" id="iv.iii-p170.4"><p class="normal" id="iv.iii-p171"><scripRef id="iv.iii-p171.1" passage="John vi. 27" parsed="|John|6|27|0|0" osisRef="Bible:John.6.27">John vi. 27</scripRef>, <scripRef passage="John 6:38" id="iv.iii-p171.2" parsed="|John|6|38|0|0" osisRef="Bible:John.6.38">38</scripRef>, <scripRef passage="John 6:39" id="iv.iii-p171.3" parsed="|John|6|39|0|0" osisRef="Bible:John.6.39">39</scripRef>.</p></note> 
To this covenant Jesus Christ refers when he said to his disciples, after his resurrection, 
“Behold I send <i>the promise of my Father</i> upon you:” but tarry ye in Jerusalem, 
until ye be endued with power from on high. And being assembled together with them, 
he commanded them that they should not depart from Jerusalem, but wait for <i>the 
promise of the Father</i>, which, saith he, ye have heard of me.<note n="484" id="iv.iii-p171.4"><p class="normal" id="iv.iii-p172"><scripRef id="iv.iii-p172.1" passage="Luke xxiv. 49" parsed="|Luke|24|49|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Luke.24.49">Luke xxiv. 
49</scripRef>. <scripRef passage="Acts 1:4" id="iv.iii-p172.2" parsed="|Acts|1|4|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Acts.1.4">Acts i. 4</scripRef>.</p></note> By the promise of 
the Father, he meant the gift of the Holy Ghost, to furnish them for their work 
as his apostles. And this promise must be the promise made to him in the covenant 
of redemption, that upon his obedience unto death, the Holy Spirit should be sent, 
effectually to apply the redemption hereby obtained, to those who were; given to 
him.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.iii-p173">The blessed Trinity in the one God may be considered as a most 
exalted, happy and glorious society, or family, uniting in the plan of divine operations; 
especially in accomplishing the work of redemption, which really comprehends all 
things, and is the grand design and end of all. In this each one has his part to 
perform according to a most wise, mutual regulation and agreement, which may be 
called <i>a covenant</i>. In performing these several parts of this work, one acts 
as superior, and another as inferior; or one acts under another; and by his authority, 
as appointed and sent by him. This is by divines called the economy of the work 
of redemption; or the economical agreement or covenant between the persons of the 
adorable Trinity respecting the redemption of man.<note n="485" id="iv.iii-p173.1"><p class="normal" id="iv.iii-p174">Economy is derived from 
a compound Greek work, and signifies the regulations and rules of a household or 
family, by which each member is to act his proper part.</p></note> According to this 
economy, the Son, the Redeemer, acts under the Father, and by his will and appointment; 
and in this respect takes an inferior part; and in this sense he is supposed to 
speak, when he says, “The Father is greater than I.”<note n="486" id="iv.iii-p174.1"><p class="normal" id="iv.iii-p175"><scripRef id="iv.iii-p175.1" passage="John xiv. 28" parsed="|John|14|28|0|0" osisRef="Bible:John.14.28">John xiv. 28</scripRef>.</p></note></p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.iii-p176">Though in the passages of scripture which have been mentioned, 
and others of the same kind, the third person in the Trinity, the Holy Spirit, is 
not expressly <pb n="441" id="iv.iii-Page_441" />mentioned as covenanting, or engaging to perform any 
part of this work; yet he is necessarily understood as concerned and included in 
this covenant, as he is m the holy scripture every where represented as acting an 
equal part in the redemption of man; and therefore must be considered as taking 
that particular part by consent and agreement. This covenant is called by most divines 
now, <span class="sc" id="iv.iii-p176.1">the covenant of redemption</span>, to distinguish it from 
what is called <i>the covenant of grace</i>, which takes place between God, or the 
Redeemer, and believers in him, which will be particularly considered hereafter.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.iii-p177">The work of the Redeemer, which has been in some measure described 
above, consists in his actually performing the part assigned to him, and undertaken 
by him, in the covenant of redemption; and in his sustaining the character and executing 
the offices which he inherits as a reward for his humiliation; in which he will 
continue forever, even when he has delivered up the delegated rule and kingdom which 
he now has, to the Father, and is, in the sense above explained, subject to the 
Father.</p>
<h2 id="iv.iii-p177.1">IMPROVEMENT.</h2>
<p class="normal" id="iv.iii-p178">I. WE learn from the view which has been now given from the scriptures, 
of the work of the Mediator and Redeemer, how important and essential the doctrine 
of his divinity is: As he must be God as well as man, in order to perform this work. 
A mere creature would be infinitely unequal to this.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.iii-p179">It is necessary that this should be believed; that his infinitely 
high and glorious person and character, as the true God, should be kept in view, 
in order to trust in him as the Redeemer of man from the infinite evil which he 
deserves; from a state of total moral depravity, to the favour of God, to perfect 
holiness and eternal life, by his suffering and obedience, and by his power, wisdom 
and goodness.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.iii-p180">It is necessary that he should be a person of infinite dignity, 
excellence and worthiness, in order to make atonement for sin by suffering the penalty 
of the law, as <pb n="442" id="iv.iii-Page_442" />it has been explained above from the scriptures. The 
sufferings of a mere creature could do nothing towards this; and had such an one 
offered to undertake this, it would have been so far from pleasing the governor 
of the world, that it must be considered as an affront offered to him, most dishonourable 
to his character, law, and government. And the obedience of a mere creature, or 
of all creatures, could not so honour the law, and the divine authority expressed 
by it, which sinners had reproached and trampled under foot by their rebellion, 
as to obtain favour, recovery from a state of sin, and eternal life for them, out 
of respect to the merit and worthiness of such obedience. This could be done by 
none but a person of infinite greatness and worth; and one who was under no obligation 
to obey antecedent to his voluntarily taking upon him the form of a servant. And 
it requires infinite power, skill and wisdom to recover a rebel from total depravity 
and enmity against God and his law, to obedience and holiness; and infinite condescension 
and goodness. All this is ascribed to the Redeemer in the holy scripture, as has 
been shown. And surely none can believe all this, and rely with confidence on the 
Redeemer for such redemption, who does not believe him to be truly God, infinitely 
great, honourable, powerful, wise and good.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.iii-p181">They who have such a low and dishonourable idea of the divine 
character, his law and moral government, as to believe sin to be infinitely less 
criminal than it really is, that it is not infinitely odious and criminal, and does 
not deserve infinite natural evil as the just punishment of it; That it is not necessary 
that the threatening of the law should be in any sense executed, in order to the 
maintenance of public truth and righteousness: That man is not so depraved but that 
he may recover himself from sin to holiness when proper methods are taken with him, 
and motives set before him to induce him to repent, and renounce his rebellion, 
without any supernatural renovation by the Spirit of God; and that in this wav he 
may obtain forgiveness, and recommend himself to the divine favour, so as to obtain 
eternal life: They who have such wrong notions of God, and his law, of sin and of 
themselves, do not, and cannot see the <pb n="443" id="iv.iii-Page_443" />need of a divine person, of 
one that is really the true God united to the human nature, to be the Redeemer of 
men: Therefore they cannot believe that Jesus Christ is such an one. Consequently 
they read the Bible under this prejudice, and find things there which appear to 
them contrary to the real divinity of Christ. They greedily catch at them, and make 
the best use of them they can, in their opposition to that doctrine; at the same 
time, exerting all their abilities to show the unreasonableness and absurdity of 
such a doctrine, and in the most plausible manner possible to explain away those 
passages of scripture, which are understood by those who believe in the divinity 
of the Redeemer of man, plainly to assert this doctrine; and to make them consistent 
with his being a mere creature. This appears to be the case with the Arians and 
Socinians, both in former ages, and in this, who join in the denial of the divinity 
of Christ, though they differ in other things respecting him; the former holding 
that he is the first and greatest creature that God has made, who after he had existed 
thousands of years a mere spirit, took a body in the womb of the Virgin Mary, and 
was born of her, &amp;c. The latter suppose he had no existence before he was conceived 
and brought forth by the virgin, his mother.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.iii-p182">But others, who view the divine character, and the law of God, 
the nature and desert of sin, the depravity, and lost, undone state of man, in the 
scriptural light in which they have been set in the preceding part of this system, 
are prepared to see their need of such a Redeemer as the Bible reveals; they consult 
that, and find that he is there declared to be “God with us,” God, who created, 
and upholds all things, manifest in the flesh; that he has given his life a ransom 
for sinners; has been made a curse to deliver men from the curse, dying for their 
sins; that he has obeyed the divine law in its requirements; that he is risen from 
the dead, and exalted to the right hand of the Father, able effectually to draw 
men unto him, and to save to the uttermost all them who come to God by him. They 
believe and are sure, and address him as Nathaniel did, “thou art the Son of God, 
thou art the King of Israel.” And as Thomas, “My Lord; and my God.” And say with <pb n="444" id="iv.iii-Page_444" />
the beloved disciple, “We know that the Son of God is come, and hath given us an 
understanding that we may know him that is true; and we are in him that is true, 
in his Son Jesus Christ. <i>This is the true God and eternal life</i>.” And they 
rest satisfied in the natural and plain sense of the words of this same John, “In 
the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. And 
the Word was made flesh, and dwelt among us; and we beheld his glory, as of the 
only begotten of the Father, full of grace and truth.”</p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.iii-p183">II. From the view we have had, by attending to the Bible, of the 
atonement for sin made by Christ, we learn, that they have made a great mistake, 
who think that this consists wholly in the obedience of the Redeemer; and that his 
sufferings, as such, and as distinguished from his obedience, are no part of the 
atonement: And therefore that he did not in any sense suffer the penalty of the 
law, in whole or in part; nor had his sufferings any direct reference to this; and 
answered no end, except that hereby his love to God and man, was exercised in a 
higher degree, and his obedience was more tried and conspicuous by obeying unto 
death, than if he had not been obliged thus to suffer.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.iii-p184">This notion of the atonement entirely excludes and denies the 
real atonement, clearly and abundantly stated and taught in the scriptures; and 
places it in that in which it does not consist. Therefore as this error wholly subverts 
the true scripture doctrine of the atonement of Christ, it is great, dangerous, 
and hurtful, in proportion to the importance and necessity of an atonement, and 
of believing and confiding in that atonement, which, according to divine revelation, 
is the only foundation of the hope of a christian.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.iii-p185">If the threatening and penalty of the law may be disregarded, 
and set aside, so as to pass wholly unexecuted, in order to pardon and favour the 
transgressor, without any vicarious sufferings of another in his stead, it will 
be difficult, and doubtless impossible, to show or see why a vicarious obedience 
to the precepts of the law is necessary in order to the sinner’s salvation. And 
why the obedience only of the Redeemer should be a sufficient ground, or any reason 
at all, why man should be delivered <pb n="445" id="iv.iii-Page_445" />from the curse of the law, it 
is presumed no one can tell; or why it was necessary that a substitute should obey 
the law in man’s stead, if there was no need of his suffering the penalty also. 
Upon this plan there appears to be no need of a Redeemer, unless it be to reveal 
the mercy of God to sinners, and his readiness to pardon and save all who repent 
and return to obedience, and persevere therein: And to set an example of holy obedience, 
and to lay down his life in confirmation of the truths which he had taught: And 
what need there is that the Redeemer should be more than a mere man, in order to 
do all this, it is believed, none can tell. The Socinian’s Redeemer is therefore 
equal to the whole of this work.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.iii-p186">III. <span class="sc" id="iv.iii-p186.1">We</span> farther learn what a great delusion 
they embrace, who think they, in their own persons, are become innocent and worthy, 
by the atonement and obedience of Christ: That his sufferings and obedience are 
so imputed to them, that they are really become their own sufferings and obedience; 
that his righteousness and holiness is in such a sense and degree, their own righteousness 
and holiness, that they themselves are, in the sight of God, perfectly innocent 
and holy. And some go so far as to say they have no ill desert or sin; nor can they 
sin, let them do what they will. This is to a dreadful degree, perverting the doctrine 
of the atonement of Christ, and his work, as the Redeemer of sinners, and of pardon 
and justification through him.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.iii-p187">It has been shewn, that the sinner who is interested in the atonement 
of Christ, and is delivered from the curse of the law, is left as ill deserving 
as he ever was, in his own person; and this his ill desert, never will, or can be 
removed. And it is equally true, that the sinner who is interested in all the merit 
and worthiness of Christ, and is for the sake of that, justified, and made heir 
of eternal life, is still as unworthy as ever in himself, in his own person, of 
the least favour: as unworthy as he could be, if the Redeemer had merited nothing 
for him, or he had no interest in his righteousness; and must remain so, and know 
that he is so, forever; And the least thought to the contrary would be infinitely <pb n="446" id="iv.iii-Page_446" />
criminal, and a most ungrateful and horrid abuse of the atonement and righteousness 
of Christ.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.iii-p188">Every thing contrary to the divine law, in the believer, is his 
own sin, and as criminal, as if he had no interest in the righteousness of Christ; 
and much more so. What the Redeemer has done and suffered is imputed to him; that 
is, is reckoned in his favour, so that he has the benefit of it, as much as if it 
were his own; and it avails to obtain deliverance, from the curse of the law, for 
him, and eternal life: But it leaves him as unworthy of any favour, as deserving 
of eternal destruction, and as great a criminal as he ever was.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.iii-p189">IV. The work of the Mediator, and his design in it, as it has 
been now considered, brings into view his wonderful love and grace, which is exercised 
towards man.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.iii-p190">In order to have an adequate view of this, we must rise in our 
conceptions to the height from which he descended; and comprehend his greatness, 
worthiness and glory; and then take a full and comprehensive view of the depth to 
which he descended in his humiliation; and the magnitude of the evil which he suffered, 
in order to redeem man. But this is absolutely impossible to men or angels; therefore, 
the love of Christ never will be fully known by angels, or the redeemed: For it 
“passeth knowledge,” as inspiration has declared. This, therefore, must be an endless 
theme, and has laid a foundation for endless progression in knowledge, love and 
happiness. The more the redeemed shall know of Christ, the greater view they will 
have of the evil which he suffered for their redemption. This infinitely exceeds 
all instances of love among creatures. This will be exhibited forever, as infinitely 
the greatest instance of love and grace in the universe, except the love of the 
Father, in giving his Son; which w ill be celebrated by the redeemed, and all the 
friends of God, without end. St. Paul dwelt on this theme, when on earth. “I live, 
said he, by the faith of the Son of God, who loved me, and gave himself for me.”<note n="487" id="iv.iii-p190.1"><p class="normal" id="iv.iii-p191">
<scripRef id="iv.iii-p191.1" passage="Gal. ii. 20" parsed="|Gal|2|20|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Gal.2.20">Gal. ii. 20</scripRef>.</p></note> “Walk in love, as Christ also hath loved us, and hath given 
himself for us.”<note n="488" id="iv.iii-p191.2"><p class="normal" id="iv.iii-p192"><scripRef id="iv.iii-p192.1" passage="Eph. v. 2" parsed="|Eph|5|2|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Eph.5.2">Eph. v. 2</scripRef>.</p></note> “Ye know the grace of our Lord Jesus Christ, 
that <pb n="447" id="iv.iii-Page_447" />
though he was rich, yet for your sakes he became poor, that ye through his poverty 
might be rich.”<note n="489" id="iv.iii-p192.2"><p class="normal" id="iv.iii-p193"><scripRef id="iv.iii-p193.1" passage="2 Cor. viii. 9" parsed="|2Cor|8|9|0|0" osisRef="Bible:2Cor.8.9">2 Cor. viii. 9</scripRef>.</p></note></p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.iii-p194">The love of Christ, exercised towards sinners, is great in proportion 
to the greatness of the evil he suffered for their redemption. The latter is infinite, 
so therefore is the former. And though he sought the glory of God, and the general 
good, in what he did and suffered, yet his love to sinners is not in the least diminished, 
or the less, by reason of this: For he<i> gave himself for them</i>. “Unto him that
<i>loved us</i>, and washed us from our sins, in his own blood. And hath made us 
kings and priests unto God and his Father; to Him be glory and dominion, forever 
and ever, Amen.”<note n="490" id="iv.iii-p194.1"><p class="normal" id="iv.iii-p195"><scripRef passage="Rev. 1:5,6" id="iv.iii-p195.1" parsed="|Rev|1|5|1|6" osisRef="Bible:Rev.1.5-Rev.1.6">Rev. i.</scripRef></p></note></p>

</div2>

<div2 title="Chapter IV. On the Application of Redemption." prev="iv.iii" next="iv.iv.i" id="iv.iv">

<h2 id="iv.iv-p0.1">CHAP. IV.</h2>
<h3 id="iv.iv-p0.2">ON THE APPLICATION OF REDEMPTION.</h3>

<div3 title="Section I. On the Application of Redemption in general." prev="iv.iv" next="iv.iv.ii" id="iv.iv.i">

<h2 id="iv.iv.i-p0.1">Section I.</h2>
<p class="center" id="iv.iv.i-p1"><i>On the Application of Redemption in general</i>.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.iv.i-p2">THE first Adam was united to all his posterity as their father, 
head, and constituted representative and substitute; and all mankind were united 
to him, as such. This may be considered, both as a natural and constituted union; 
by which all his children were to have the benefit of his obedience, as much as 
if it were their own personal obedience, should he obey through the time of his 
trial; so that his holiness should insure perfect, everlasting holiness and happiness 
to them: And, on the other hand, his disobedience should descend to them, and make 
them sinners, and entail sin and ruin on all his posterity; so that their sin, guilt 
and ruin, were connected with his rebellion, and, in this sense, his sin, was their 
sin.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.iv.i-p3">The second Adam has no such natural union with mankind, as their 
natural father and head, and they have <pb n="448" id="iv.iv.i-Page_448" />no union to him in this way: 
But they must, in some way and manner, be united to him, and he to them, in order 
to his becoming their head and representative, so as to share in the saving benefits 
of his atonement and righteousness. He is constituted by God a public head and representative, 
as the first Adam was, and is substituted to obey and suffer for man; but in order 
to their being actually interested in the benefit of his atonement and righteousness, 
they must be united to him, and he to them, so as to be in a sense one, as the head 
and members of the natural body are one. This union, by divine constitution and 
appointment, is to take place and consist in a mutual voluntary consent; the Redeemer 
offering himself to them, and they consenting and complying with his proposal and 
offer, and accepting of him, and trusting in him as their Redeemer. This lays the 
foundation for a treaty with mankind; in the prosecution of which, redemption is 
actually applied; not to all mankind, but to those who cordially embrace the offer, 
and accept of Christ, and salvation by him. This is particularly stated in the scripture. 
Christ says, “God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, <i>that 
whosoever believeth in him</i>, should not perish, but have everlasting life.”<note n="491" id="iv.iv.i-p3.1"><p class="normal" id="iv.iv.i-p4">
<scripRef id="iv.iv.i-p4.1" passage="John iii. 16" parsed="|John|3|16|0|0" osisRef="Bible:John.3.16">John iii. 16</scripRef>.</p></note> These words suppose, and implicitly assert, that none but
<i>believers</i> are to be saved by the Redeemer, as no others have that relation 
to him, and union with him, which is necessary, in order to give them an interest 
in redemption by him. This Christ expressly asserted, when he commissioned the apostles 
to go forth and treat with men, in order to effect the application of his redemption; 
without which no man could be saved. “And he said unto them, Go ye into all the 
world, and preach the gospel to every creature. He that believeth, and is baptised, 
shall be saved; but he that believeth not, shall be damned.”<note n="492" id="iv.iv.i-p4.2"><p class="normal" id="iv.iv.i-p5"><scripRef id="iv.iv.i-p5.1" passage="Mark xvi. 15" parsed="|Mark|16|15|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Mark.16.15">Mark xvi. 15</scripRef>, 
<scripRef passage="Mark 16:16" id="iv.iv.i-p5.2" parsed="|Mark|16|16|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Mark.16.16">16</scripRef>.</p></note></p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.iv.i-p6">As all mankind are united to Adam, as his posterity, his seed; 
so Christ has a seed, a posterity, who are by their union to him, made the children 
of God, and joint heirs with him, to whom the promise of salvation is made. These 
are not all mankind, but <i>believers in him</i>. For thus saith the scripture. “The children of the <pb n="449" id="iv.iv.i-Page_449" />promise are counted for <i>the seed</i>. Know 
ye, therefore, that they which are of faith, the same are the children of Abraham. 
For ye are all the children of God, by faith in Christ Jesus. For as many of you 
as have been baptized into Christ, have put on Christ. And if ye be Christ’s, then 
ye are Abraham’s seed, and heirs according to the promise; heirs of God, and joint 
heirs with Jesus Christ. Now we, brethren, as Isaac was, are the children of the 
promise.”<note n="493" id="iv.iv.i-p6.1"><p class="normal" id="iv.iv.i-p7"><scripRef id="iv.iv.i-p7.1" passage="Rom. viii. 17" parsed="|Rom|8|17|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Rom.8.17">Rom. viii. 17</scripRef>. <scripRef passage="Rom 9:8" id="iv.iv.i-p7.2" parsed="|Rom|9|8|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Rom.9.8">ix. 8</scripRef>. <scripRef passage="Gal 3:7,27,27,29" id="iv.iv.i-p7.3" parsed="|Gal|3|7|0|0;|Gal|3|27|0|0;|Gal|3|27|0|0;|Gal|3|29|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Gal.3.7 Bible:Gal.3.27 Bible:Gal.3.27 Bible:Gal.3.29">
Gal. iii. 7, 26, 27, 29</scripRef>. <scripRef passage="Gal 4:28" id="iv.iv.i-p7.4" parsed="|Gal|4|28|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Gal.4.28">
iv. 28</scripRef>.</p></note></p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.iv.i-p8">The Redeemer has made an atonement sufficient to expiate for the 
sins of the whole world; and, in this sense, has tasted death for every man, has 
taken away the sin of the world, has given himself a ransom for all, and is the 
propitiation for the sins of the whole world, so that <i>whosoever</i> believeth 
in him may be saved, and God can now be just, and the justifier of him that believeth 
in Jesus. Therefore, the gospel is ordered to be preached to the whole world, to 
all nations, to every human creature: And the offer of salvation by Christ is to 
be made to every one, with this declaration, that whosoever believeth, is willing 
to accept of it, shall be delivered from the curse of the law, and have eternal 
life.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.iv.i-p9">But as all mankind are totally depraved, and are become enemies 
to God, his law and government, and consequently equal enemies to the Redeemer, 
and salvation by him, they are all prepared and disposed to refuse to accept of 
the offered salvation, and reject it with their whole hearts, whatever motives are 
set before them, and methods taken to persuade them to comply. This lays the foundation 
of the necessity of the renovation of the hearts of men by the holy Spirit, in order 
to their believing and embracing the gospel; of which the scripture speaks abundantly. 
Christ taught, that except a man be born of the spirit, he cannot enter into the 
kingdom of God, or so much as see it. St. Paul says, that all believers are the 
subjects of the mighty power of God, operating upon them, by which they have been 
brought to believe: That they, being naturally dead in trespasses and sins, have 
been made alive by God; and that faith is the gift of God; that they are saved not 
by <pb n="450" id="iv.iv.i-Page_450" />any works of righteousness which they have done, but by the washing 
of regeneration, and renewing of the Holy Ghost; so that it is not of him that willeth, 
nor of him that runneth, but of God who sheweth mercy, and worketh in them by his 
Spirit, to will and to run, &amp;c. &amp;c.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.iv.i-p10">By this renovation, men are said in scripture to be made new creatures, 
and to be created in Christ, unto good works; and believers are said to be in Christ, 
and to <i>put on</i> Christ. This union of the believer to Christ may be considered 
as consisting in two things, viz. 1. In Christ’s uniting himself to him by his Spirit, 
by which he takes possession of him, is formed in him, and dwells in him: And by 
the Spirit of God, the believer is drawn to him. “No man cometh unto me, says Christ, 
except the Father, which hath sent me, draw him.” 2. In the believer’s uniting himself 
to Christ, by actually cleaving to him, trusting in him, and loving him; all which 
is implied in saying faith, or <i>believing</i> on Christ; and which is also implied 
in Christ’s uniting himself to the believer, mentioned in the foregoing particular. 
This union is begun in regeneration and conversion, by which Christ, by his Spirit, 
takes possession of the heart, produces faith and christian holiness; in the exercise 
of which, the believer cleaves to Christ in holy love. But of these it is proposed 
to treat more particularly in some following sections.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.iv.i-p11">This union between Christ and believers in him, is represented 
by a variety of similitudes in scripture. It is represented by a building composed 
of stones, all resting on a chief corner stone, which bears up the whole. By the 
natural body, consisting of head and members, all united to the head; the life and 
every function of the body, and each of the members depending upon their union with 
the head, and being derived from that: It is compared to the union of the food and 
drink, to the stomach and body, being taken into that, and digested, and thereby 
spreading life and spirit through the whole, for its constant support. “Except ye 
eat the flesh of the Son of man, and drink his blood, ye have no life in you. Whosoever 
eateth my flesh, <pb n="451" id="iv.iv.i-Page_451" />and drinketh my blood, hath eternal life.”<note n="494" id="iv.iv.i-p11.1"><p class="normal" id="iv.iv.i-p12">
<scripRef id="iv.iv.i-p12.1" passage="John vi. 53" parsed="|John|6|53|0|0" osisRef="Bible:John.6.53">John vi. 53</scripRef>, <scripRef passage="John 6:54" id="iv.iv.i-p12.2" parsed="|John|6|54|0|0" osisRef="Bible:John.6.54">54</scripRef>.</p></note> It is illustrated by the union of the branch with the vine, 
by which the former derives life, sap and nourishment from the latter. “I am the 
vine, ye are the branches.”<note n="495" id="iv.iv.i-p12.3"><p class="normal" id="iv.iv.i-p13"><scripRef id="iv.iv.i-p13.1" passage="John xv. 5" parsed="|John|15|5|0|0" osisRef="Bible:John.15.5">John xv. 5</scripRef>.</p></note> 
To mention no more, it is frequently represented by the union between the husband 
and the wife, which is a voluntary or a moral union, and by which the wife shares 
in the dignity, goods and possessions of her husband, and receives protection and 
support from him. The church is therefore called “the bride, the Lamb’s wife.” Believers, 
by their union to Christ, receive the benefit of his sufferings and obedience, and 
are made rich, partaking in all his fulness; and become joint heirs with him of 
eternal inheritance.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.iv.i-p14">The union between Christ and believers is a moral and spiritual 
union: In this respect, “He who is joined to the Lord, is one spirit.”<note n="496" id="iv.iv.i-p14.1"><p class="normal" id="iv.iv.i-p15"><scripRef id="iv.iv.i-p15.1" passage="1 Cor. vi. 17" parsed="|1Cor|6|17|0|0" osisRef="Bible:1Cor.6.17">1 Cor. 
vi. 17</scripRef>.</p></note> It is an imperfect union in the beginning of it: It is therefore 
a growing union, until it shall be made perfect; it being a lasting union, which 
shall continue forever. And when this becomes perfect, which it will not, in its 
most complete state, till the resurrection, there will be a full and perfect participation 
of redemption by Christ; and that prayer of Christ will then be completely answered. 
“Neither pray I for these alone, but for them also which shall believe on me through 
their word: That they all may be <i>one</i>, as thou, Father, art in me, and I in 
thee; that they also may be <i>one in us</i>. And the glory which thou gavest me, 
I have given unto them; that they may be one, even as we are one. <i>I in them</i>, 
and thou in me, that they may be made perfect in one. That the love wherewith thou 
hast loved me, may be in them, <i>and I in them</i>.”<note n="497" id="iv.iv.i-p15.2"><p class="normal" id="iv.iv.i-p16"><scripRef passage="John 17:26" id="iv.iv.i-p16.1" parsed="|John|17|26|0|0" osisRef="Bible:John.17.26">
John xvii</scripRef>.</p></note></p>

</div3>

<div3 title="Section II. On Regeneration." prev="iv.iv.i" next="iv.iv.iii" id="iv.iv.ii">
<h2 id="iv.iv.ii-p0.1">Section II.</h2>
<p class="center" id="iv.iv.ii-p1"><i>On Regeneration</i>.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.iv.ii-p2">IT has been observed, that mankind being naturally under the power 
of sin and total depravity, it is necessary that they should be the subjects of 
a renovation by <pb n="452" id="iv.iv.ii-Page_452" />the Spirit of God, in order to their union to Christ, 
and being redeemed by him. It is proposed now to attend more particularly to this 
renovation, as it is represented in the holy scriptures.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.iv.ii-p3">Regeneration and conversion are often used only as two words, 
meaning the same thing; and it is certain that all that can be properly understood 
by them, is that change and renovation which is expressed in scripture, by being
<i>born again, born of the Spirit of God</i>, and <i>born of God, created in Christ 
Jesus, unto good works</i>, &amp;c. Yet, as there are two distinct things included in 
this change, which it is necessary should be distinguished, in order to understand 
this subject, these words may be properly used, to make and keep up this distinction, 
as many divines have done. In this renovation, there is the operation of the cause, 
which is the work done by the Spirit of God; and there is the effect, which consists 
in the exercises of the regenerate, in which they are active, and agents. Though 
these imply each other, and cannot be separated, more than the cause can be separated 
from the effect; yet they must be distinguished, and the former may properly be 
called regeneration. In order to explain this, and prevent mistakes concerning it, 
the following things must be observed.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.iv.ii-p4">1. The Spirit of God is the only agent and cause by whose energy 
the effect takes place; and so far as the Spirit of God, is the cause and agent, 
the subject, the heart of man, is passive, being the subject on which, or in which, 
the effect is wrought. Though the effect be activity, or the exercise of the new 
heart, in which the renewed person is the agent; yet, in the operation which causes 
the effect to exist, and therefore in the order of nature, is antecedent to the 
effect, the Spirit of God is the only agent, and man is the passive subject.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.iv.ii-p5">2. This change, of which the Spirit of God is the cause, and in 
which he is the only agent, is instantaneous; wrought not gradually, but at once. 
The human heart is either a heart of stone, a rebellious heart, or a new heart. 
The man is either under the dominion of sin, as obstinate and vile as ever, dead 
in trespasses and sins; or his heart is humble and penitent; he is a new creature, 
and spiritually alive. There can be no instant of <pb n="453" id="iv.iv.ii-Page_453" />time, in which the 
heart is neither a hard heart, nor a new heart, and the man is neither dead in trespasses 
and sins, nor spiritually alive. The Spirit of God finds the heart of man wholly 
corrupt, and desperately wicked, wholly and strongly, even with all the power he 
has, opposed to God and his law, and to that renovation which he produces. The enmity 
of the heart against God continues as strong as ever it was, till it is slain by 
the instantaneous energy of the divine Spirit, and from carnal it becomes spiritual, 
betwixt which there is no medium, according to scripture and reason. All the exercises 
of the hard, impenitent, unrenewed heart, are exercises of impenitence and rebellion, 
of enmity against God and his law; whatever the external conduct may be, they are 
the corrupt fruit of a corrupt, rebellious heart. The exercises and fruit of a heart, 
dead in trespasses and sins, are <i>dead works</i>. If this were not demonstrably 
certain from the nature of the case, it is abundantly asserted in the scripture, 
and our Saviour has decided it in the most express manner. His words are, “Either 
make the tree good, and his fruit good, or else make the tree corrupt, and his fruit 
corrupt. A good man, out of the good treasure of his heart, bringeth forth good 
things: And an evil man, out of the evil treasure, bringeth forth evil things.”<note n="498" id="iv.iv.ii-p5.1"><p class="normal" id="iv.iv.ii-p6">
<scripRef id="iv.iv.ii-p6.1" passage="Matth. xii. 33" parsed="|Matt|12|33|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Matt.12.33">Matth. xii. 33</scripRef>, <scripRef passage="Matth 12:35" id="iv.iv.ii-p6.2" parsed="|Matt|12|35|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Matt.12.35">35</scripRef>.</p></note> St. Paul repeatedly asserts the same thing. By a number 
of quotations from the Old Testament, he proves that all men are by nature, altogether, 
and to a great degree, corrupt; that there is nothing morally good in them, or done 
by them.<note n="499" id="iv.iv.ii-p6.3"><p class="normal" id="iv.iv.ii-p7"><scripRef id="iv.iv.ii-p7.1" passage="Rom. iii. 9" parsed="|Rom|3|9|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Rom.3.9">Rom. iii. 9</scripRef>, &amp;c.</p></note> He asserts that antecedent to regeneration, 
man does nothing morally good; that all of this kind is the consequence of it. “We 
are his workmanship, created in Christ Jesus unto good works.”<note n="500" id="iv.iv.ii-p7.2"><p class="normal" id="iv.iv.ii-p8"><scripRef id="iv.iv.ii-p8.1" passage="Eph. ii. 10" parsed="|Eph|2|10|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Eph.2.10">Eph. ii. 10</scripRef>.</p></note> 
And again he says, “We ourselves also were sometimes foolish, disobedient, 
deceived, serving divers lusts and pleasures, living in malice and envy, hateful, 
and hating one another. But after that the kindness and love of God our Saviour 
appeared, not by works of righteousness, which we have done, but according to his 
mercy, he saved us by the washing of regeneration, and renewing of the Holy Ghost.”<note n="501" id="iv.iv.ii-p8.2"><p class="normal" id="iv.iv.ii-p9">
<scripRef id="iv.iv.ii-p9.1" passage="Tit. iii. 3" parsed="|Titus|3|3|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Titus.3.3">Tit. iii. 3</scripRef>, <scripRef passage="Tit 3:4" id="iv.iv.ii-p9.2" parsed="|Titus|3|4|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Titus.3.4">4</scripRef>, <scripRef passage="Tit 3:5" id="iv.iv.ii-p9.3" parsed="|Titus|3|5|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Titus.3.5">5</scripRef>.</p></note> Here he describes their state and moral <pb n="454" id="iv.iv.ii-Page_454" />
character, which is the character of all men, antecedent to regeneration. He denies 
their having done any good works; but, on the contrary, says, all their works were 
evil, and gives them a very bad character. He then ascribes all their reformation, 
and the alteration of their character for the better, to their regeneration, by 
which alone they were washed from their moral pollutions.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.iv.ii-p10">3. The subject of this operation, in which this change and effect 
is wrought, is the will or the heart; that is, the moral and not the natural powers 
and faculties of the soul. As moral depravity is wholly in the will or heart, the 
source and seat of all moral actions, the divine operation directly respects the 
heart, and consists in changing and renewing that. The understanding or intellect, 
considered as distinct from the will, is a natural Faculty, and is not capable of 
moral depravity. It may be hurt and weakened, and improved to bad purposes, as other 
natural faculties may, by the moral corruption or sinfulness of the heart: But nothing 
is necessary, in order to remove the disorders of the intellect, and all the natural 
powers of the soul, but the renovation of the heart; so far as the will is right, 
the understanding, considered as a natural faculty, will be rectified, and do its 
office well. Therefore regeneration is in scripture represented as consisting in 
giving <i>a new heart</i>, a heart to know the Lord, &amp;c. The scripture indeed speaks 
of the understanding being enlightened; and of its being darkened; and of being 
without understanding, as criminal; and represents a good understanding, as comprehending 
all virtue or holiness. But the understanding in these instances is not considered 
and spoken of as mere intellect, distinct from the will or heart; but as comprehending 
and principally intending the heart, which is the seat of all moral perception and 
exercise. In scripture the distinction between the understanding and the heart is 
not often made; but the former is generally spoken of as implying the latter, and 
consisting in that discerning, which is implied in right exercises of heart; and 
cannot take place any farther than the heart is renewed, and the will is right. 
Therefore we read of “a wise and <i>understanding heart</i>.” And wisdom and understanding 
are words frequently used in scripture as <pb n="455" id="iv.iv.ii-Page_455" />nearly synonymous, and denoting 
die same thing: But <i>wisdom</i> belongs to the heart, and is of a moral nature; 
and that in which, according to the scripture, true holiness consists.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.iv.ii-p11">All moral, criminal darkness, has its scat in the heart, as all 
sin has, and the former cannot be distinguished from the latter; and selfishness 
is the essence of both. And on the contrary, all true light and understanding, which 
is of a moral nature, belongs to the heart, and implies real holiness, and cannot 
be separated, and even distinguished from it, as one necessarily implies and involves 
the other. This is asserted by our divine teacher in the following words: “The light 
of the body is the eye: If therefore thine eye be single, thy whole body shall be 
full of light. But if thine eye be evil, thy whole body shall be full of darkness.”<note n="502" id="iv.iv.ii-p11.1"><p class="normal" id="iv.iv.ii-p12">
<scripRef id="iv.iv.ii-p12.1" passage="Matt. vi. 22" parsed="|Matt|6|22|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Matt.6.22">Matt. vi. 22</scripRef>, <scripRef passage="Matt 6:23" id="iv.iv.ii-p12.2" parsed="|Matt|6|23|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Matt.6.23">23</scripRef>.</p></note> The single and evil eye are opposites, and belong to the 
heart, and consist in the exercises of that. This is said by Christ of the evil 
eye. “For from within, <i>out of the heart of men</i>, proceed evil thoughts, adulteries, 
fornications, murders, thefts, covetousness, wickedness, deceit, lasciviousness,
<i>an evil eye</i>, blasphemy, pride, foolishness. All these evil things come from 
within, and defile the man.”<note n="503" id="iv.iv.ii-p12.3"><p class="normal" id="iv.iv.ii-p13"><scripRef id="iv.iv.ii-p13.1" passage="Mark vii. 21" parsed="|Mark|7|21|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Mark.7.21">Mark vii. 21</scripRef>, <scripRef passage="Mark 7:22" id="iv.iv.ii-p13.2" parsed="|Mark|7|22|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Mark.7.22">22</scripRef>, <scripRef passage="Mark 7:23" id="iv.iv.ii-p13.3" parsed="|Mark|7|23|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Mark.7.23">23</scripRef>.</p></note> 
Here an evil eye, which fills the mind with darkness, and is darkness itself, is 
numbered among the evil things which belong to the corrupt heart, and of which that 
is the source, and is altogether criminal. And, consequently, the single eye, which 
is opposite to the evil eye, must also belong to the heart, and consists in that 
which is real holiness, or which implies it. Where this is, the man is full of light.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.iv.ii-p14">Therefore, in regeneration, the heart being changed and renewed, 
light and understanding take place; and there is no need of any operation on the 
understanding, or intellectual faculty of the mind, as distinguished from the heart, 
or any change in that, which does not necessarily take place, upon the renovation 
of the w ill or heart.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.iv.ii-p15">As the moral disorder and depravity of man lies wholly in his 
heart, the cure and renovation must begin and end there; and when the heart is perfectly 
right, the man will be wholly recovered to perfect holiness.</p>
<pb n="456" id="iv.iv.ii-Page_456" />
<p class="normal" id="iv.iv.ii-p16">This point is particularly observed and stated, to expose and 
rectify a mistake which has been too often made, representing regeneration as consisting: 
chiefly, if not wholly, in renewing the understanding, as distinguished from the 
will, and letting light into that, antecedent to any change of the heart, and in 
order to it; and by which light in the understanding, the will is inclined and turned 
from sin to holiness. This is turning this matter upside down, and has a dangerous 
and bad tendency. It supposes that human depravity lies in the understanding, and 
not in the will; or, at least, that it has its foundation and beginning in the former; 
and that when that comes right, the will or heart acts right, of course. The consequence 
is, that there is little or no moral depravity in the heart, that being ready to 
do its office well, when the understanding is set right: Therefore, man is not blameable 
for his depravity, and not being holy, since his blindness, which alone, is in the 
way of his acting right, is not dependent on his will, ©r owing to any disorders 
in that. It is, indeed, imposable to give true moral light and understanding to 
the depraved mind of man, by any operation whatsoever on the intellect, antecedent 
to the renovation of the will; for the darkness is in the latter, and consists in 
the wrong inclination of that; and therefore cannot be removed, but by renewing 
the heart.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.iv.ii-p17">Others have supposed, that there is in regeneration, an operation 
on the understanding, or intellect first, in order to enlighten the mind; and then 
by divine energy, the will is renewed, and brought to comply with the light let 
into the understanding. But this is unscriptural and contrary to the nature and 
order of things; and tends to lead to hurtful mistakes, as has been observed. Nothing 
is necessary but the renovation of the w ill, in order to set every thing right 
in the human soul: And if the will be not renewed, or a new heart be not given, 
by an immediate operation, no operation on any other faculty of the soul, and no 
supposable or possible change can set the heart right, or renew it in the least 
degree. The scripture makes no such distinction between the faculties of the soul 
in treating of this matter; but represents the renovation of the will, or giving 
a new heart, <pb n="457" id="iv.iv.ii-Page_457" />as setting the whole soul right in all the powers and 
faculties of it.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.iv.ii-p18">4. The divine operation in regeneration, of which the new heart 
is the effect, is immediate, or it is not wrought by the energy of any means as 
the cause of it; but by the immediate power and energy of the Holy Spirit. It is 
called a creation, and the divine agency in it is as much without any medium, as 
in creating something from nothing. Men are not regenerated in the sense in which 
we are now considering regeneration, by light or the word of God. This is evident 
from what has been observed under the last particular. If the evil eye, which is 
total darkness, and shuts all the light out, be the evil, corrupt heart of man; 
then this corrupt heart must be renewed, in order to there being any true light 
in the mind, and previous to it. There must be a discerning heart, which is the 
same with a new heart, in order to see the light; and therefore this cannot be produced 
by light. The evil eye, which shuts out all the light, cannot be cured, and made 
a single eye, by seeing the light: And the light cannot have any effect, or answer 
any end, till they are so far made single, as to admit the light: Therefore, that 
operation which changes the evil eye to a single eye, cannot be by means of light; 
but must take place antecedent to any light, or any influence or effect that can 
be produced by it. It is said the Lord opened the heart of Lydia, that she attended 
unto the things that were spoken by Paul. It would be a contradiction, and very 
absurd, to say, that the word spoken by Paul, was that by which her heart was opened; 
for she knew not what he did speak, until her heart was opened to attend to his 
words, and understand them. Her heart was first opened, in order to his words having 
any effect, or giving any light to her. And this must be done by an immediate operation 
of the Spirit of God on her heart. This was the regeneration now under consideration, 
by which her heart was renewed, and formed to true discerning, like the single eye.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.iv.ii-p19">St. James says, “Of his own will begat he us, <i>with the 
word of truth</i>.”<note n="504" id="iv.iv.ii-p19.1"><p class="normal" id="iv.iv.ii-p20"><scripRef id="iv.iv.ii-p20.1" passage="James i. 18" parsed="|Jas|1|18|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Jas.1.18">James i. 18</scripRef>.</p></note> But here in regeneration he includes <pb n="458" id="iv.iv.ii-Page_458" />
the effect wrought, or conversion, and does not mean only the act by which the effect 
is produced, as distinguished from the effect, which is intended by the regeneration 
now under consideration. The effect produced by the regenerating energy of the Spirit 
of God, in the adult, is active conversion, which supposes light and truth in the 
discerning mind, and exercises answerable to it; which is to be particularly considered, 
under the next general head.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.iv.ii-p21">5. The divine operation in the regeneration of which we are speaking, 
though very great and powerful, is altogether imperceptible by the subject on whom 
the work is wrought, and by which he is regenerated. Nothing is perceived but the 
effect, which in the adult consists in perception of truth, and answerable exercises. 
The cause is to be learned and known only by the effect. When Adam was created, 
he perceived nothing, and was conscious of nothing, but his own existence, perceptions 
and exercises. The divine operation, which was the cause of his existence, was over 
and finished, before he began to perceive any thing. Every creature is constantly 
supported by God, and divine energy attends and is exerted in all our motions and 
actions; “For in him we live and move, (or which is more agreeable to the original,
<i>are moved</i>) and have our being.” “And the inspiration of the Almighty giveth 
us understanding.” Yet we perceive nothing but the effect, and argue the cause from 
the effect. So it is in this case. “The wind bloweth where it listeth, and thou 
hearest the sound thereof, but canst not tell whence it cometh, and whither it goeth: 
So is every one that is born of the Spirit.”<note n="505" id="iv.iv.ii-p21.1"><p class="normal" id="iv.iv.ii-p22"><scripRef id="iv.iv.ii-p22.1" passage="John iii. 8" parsed="|John|3|8|0|0" osisRef="Bible:John.3.8">John iii. 8</scripRef>.</p></note></p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.iv.ii-p23">6. The grace granted in regeneration is a sovereign, undeserved 
and unpromised favour.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.iv.ii-p24">The sinner, who is the chosen subject of this operation, and object 
of this favour, is infinitely ill deserving; and is disposed to go on in rebellion, 
till this change is wrought. He is obstinate, and refuses to hearken to the divine 
command, to repent and embrace the gospel, and the offer of mercy, whatever methods 
have been taken with him to reclaim him. However much he may be 
<pb n="459" id="iv.iv.ii-Page_459" />terrified with the fears of threatened destruction, and the evil, 
dangerous state in which he is; and though he may have earnest desires to escape 
misery, and be happy forever; and may make many prayers, and do many things, he 
has not the least inclination to repent, submit to God and accept of offered mercy; 
but directly contrary to all this, he with his whole heart abuses every favour granted 
to him, rejects the offer of mercy, opposes God, slights Christ, and resists the 
Holy Ghost, in all his prayers, and in all he does; for still his heart is ii heart 
of stone, an impenitent, rebellious heart, and is full of enmity against God. This 
character is given of all the unregenerate, in the scripture. Therefore he is not 
only undeserving of any favour, and especially of this, and infinitely ill deserving; 
but is constantly provoking God to give him up to utter destruction. When the sinner 
is in this situation, God has mercy on him, and by his Spirit gives him a new heart. 
Surely this is, in the highest sense, <i>sovereign mercy</i>; God is infinitely 
far from being under obligation to any sinner to do this for him: “Therefore hath 
he mercy on whom he will have mercy, and whom he will he hardeneth.”</p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.iv.ii-p25">And God has not obliged himself by any promise to grant this mercy 
to any individual person, antecedent to his actually doing it. He has made no promise, 
in his word, to those who do not accept nor desire the mercy and salvation which 
he offers, but reject it with their whole heart; which is true of all the unregenerate, 
as has been observed. There are indeed promises made to the church, that God will 
pour out his Spirit, and regenerate sinners; but no individual, unconverted sinner 
can claim this promise, as it is not made to him in particular. There are promises 
made to those who repent and believe the gospel, that they shall be saved, that 
the Spirit of God shall dwell in them forever, &amp;c. but the regenerating influences 
of the Spirit, which are antecedent to faith, and the first act of faith, which 
is the gift of God, are unpromised gifts and favours; and God cannot be under any 
obligation to those who receive them by promise, or any other way.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.iv.ii-p26">7. The divine operation, by which men are regenerated, and a new 
heart is given, is not in the least degree <pb n="460" id="iv.iv.ii-Page_460" />inconsistent with human 
liberty; nor does it impede or obstruct it, in any respect: But finds and leaves 
men in the free exercise of all desirable or possible freedom, and wholly blameable 
for all the exercises of their heart, not conformable to the law of God; and commendable 
for all right exercises of the new heart; which are as much their own, and as free, 
as if they had taken place without any divine influences, were this possible.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.iv.ii-p27">This is evident and certain, if liberty consists in voluntary 
action, or in the choice and exercises of the will, and in nothing else. No compulsion 
can be offered to the will, or the freedom of it be any way affected by any operation 
or influence on the mind which takes place antecedent to the exercise of the will, 
and in order to the choice that is made. Man is active only in willing; and in this 
only consists his moral freedom. And in this he is not capable of compulsion; and 
no impression that is made upon him, nor any operation whatsoever can take away 
his liberty in the least degree, unless it obstructs and is inconsistent with his 
acting voluntarily: For so far, and so long, as he does this, and puts forth acts 
of will, they are his own acts, and he is free; and enjoys and exercises all the 
freedom of which there can be any consistent conception, or that is possible in 
the nature of things. [See Part I. Chap. 4, page 174, &amp;c.] Antecedent to regeneration 
man acts freely. With great strength of inclination and choice his heart opposes 
the law of God, and rejects the gospel, seeking himself wholly. And when the instantaneous, 
immediate energy of the holy Spirit renews his heart, he turns about, and loves 
and chooses what he hated before; and exercises as real freedom in his choice and 
pursuit of that which he had opposed and rejected.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.iv.ii-p28">8. Regeneration is but the beginning of a divine operation which 
does not wholly renew the heart at once; but from this small beginning the operation 
continues and goes on to perfection, that is, till the heart is made perfectly clean 
and holy; which w ill not be accomplished till death. For God continues to work 
in the regenerate to will and to do, and they <pb n="461" id="iv.iv.ii-Page_461" />are as dependant on 
divine influence for every after right exercise of will, as for the first. And God 
who begins this’ good work in them will perform it, and go on with it, until the 
day of Jesus Christ.<note n="506" id="iv.iv.ii-p28.1"><p class="normal" id="iv.iv.ii-p29"><scripRef id="iv.iv.ii-p29.1" passage="Phil. i. 6" parsed="|Phil|1|6|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Phil.1.6">Phil. i. 6</scripRef>. <scripRef passage="Phil 2:13" id="iv.iv.ii-p29.2" parsed="|Phil|2|13|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Phil.2.13">ii. 13</scripRef>.</p></note></p>

</div3>

<div3 title="Section III. On Conversion." prev="iv.iv.ii" next="iv.iv.iv" id="iv.iv.iii">
<h2 id="iv.iv.iii-p0.1">Section III.</h2>
<p class="center" id="iv.iv.iii-p1"><i>On Conversion</i>.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.iv.iii-p2">THE effect of the regenerating influence of the Spirit of God, 
which consists in conversion, is next to be more particularly considered.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.iv.iii-p3">Regeneration, in the sense in which it has now been considered, 
is the cause of voluntary action in him who is the subject of the operation, or 
issues in it; which consists in turning from sin to God, or in holy exercise, which 
is true love to God, and loving our neighbour as ourselves; which implies a sight 
and belief of the truth, repentance, faith in Christ, and submission and devotedness 
to him, his interest and service, &amp;c. As the law of God requires
<span class="sc" id="iv.iv.iii-p3.1">love</span>, and nothing but love, considered as comprehending 
all the proper and genuine fruits and expressions of it; so the new creature, or 
that which is born of God, consists wholly in love, as it is conformity to the law 
of God, which is all comprehended in these two commands, “Thou shalt love the Lord 
thy God with all thy heart, and with all thy soul, and with all thy mind. And thou 
shalt love thy neighbour as thyself.” Therefore St. John says, “He that <i>loveth</i> 
is born of God. God is love, and he that dwelleth in love, dwelleth in God, and 
God in him. “As God is love, and this comprehends the whole of his moral character; 
so love in creatures, is the moral image of God, and it consists altogether in this. 
This love, of which God and the creature are the objects, is, in the nature of it, 
one and the same undivided affection, differing only as it is exercised towards 
different objects, on various occasions, and in diverse circumstances. It consists 
in <span class="sc" id="iv.iv.iii-p3.2">universal benevolence</span>; or benevolence to being in general 
capable of happiness, and all that affection and exercise of heart which is necessarily 
included in this. Universal <pb n="462" id="iv.iv.iii-Page_462" />
benevolence, or goodness, is necessarily pleased with good and happiness wherever 
it takes place; for it seeks the general good, and that to the greatest possible 
degree; it must therefore be gratified, wherever happiness takes place, and that 
in proportion to the degree of it. And, of consequence, it must be pleased with 
every benevolent being, who wishes the greatest general good, and promotes it, according 
to his capacity, and the opportunity he has to do it. Therefore benevolence must 
have the greatest degree of pleasure in that being who has the greatest degree of 
benevolence, and does the most good. And this is the love of complacence, and is 
necessarily implied in benevolence, and really an exercise of it, and can take place 
no where but in the benevolent heart. Benevolence esteems benevolent affection, 
as the greatest excellence and worth; and therefore exercises the highest love of 
esteem towards him who has the greatest degree of benevolence, and does the most 
good. And the benevolent person exercises true gratitude towards every being who 
is doing good to individuals, and promoting the greatest general or public good. 
Thus complacential love, the love of esteem and the love of gratitude, are included 
in benevolence, and essential to it; and are really nothing more than benevolent 
affection. He who has universal benevolence has all virtuous, holy love, as all 
is necessarily implied and comprehended in this. The new, benevolent heart, is an 
illuminated heart. The eye is now become single, and all is full of light. The person 
is now turned from darkness to marvellous light, and being spiritual, discerneth 
and knoweth all things. He sees and believes the great truths contained in divine 
revelation; and cordially embraces them as true and excellent.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.iv.iii-p4">This holy affection, in which the new creature consists, discerns 
the being and perfections of God, as realities and glorious, as they were never 
seen before. And this holy love is fixed, in the first place, on this sum and fountain 
of all being, benevolence and perfection, as the supreme object of benevolent affection. 
Here the benevolent heart finds an object every way, and in all respects, suited 
to draw forth the strongest exercises of benevolent, friendly affection, in rejoicing 
in his infinite, <pb n="463" id="iv.iv.iii-Page_463" />eternal, independent existence, felicity and glory; 
exercising and enjoying supreme delight, and complacential love in his infinite 
perfection and benevolence; and sweet gratitude to him for the glorious exercise 
and display of his love; devoting himself to his service and honour, and exerting 
cordial and strong benevolence and friendship, in ardently desiring that God may 
be glorified to the highest degree forever; and wishing to be the active instrument 
of this, as the greatest happiness he can desire, or imagine.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.iv.iii-p5">The new heart sees and approves of the divine law in the extent 
and spirituality of it, requiring perfect love to God and man; and threatening disobedience 
with infinite evil; and it is agreeable to him that this law should be maintained 
and honoured forever. And in this light he sees his own total depravity, and the 
unsearchable wickedness of his heart. He beholds the exceeding sinfulness of sin, 
and its desert of infinite evil, as a proper punishment. He hence sees his own infinite 
odiousness and ill desert, and condemns and abhors himself for all his transgressions, 
and contrariety to God and his law: And confesses his sins, repenting as in dust 
and ashes. The new heart is therefore a broken, contrite, humble, penitent heart. 
True repentance is necessarily implied in real conversion; and therefore the whole 
of conversion is often in scripture expressed by it, and called repentance. And 
this continues and increases through the whole life of a real convert.<note n="507" id="iv.iv.iii-p5.1"><p class="normal" id="iv.iv.iii-p6">The 
total depravity of man, and the infinite odiousness and criminality of all sin, 
are so implied in all the leading truths in the Bible, that a thorough conversion, 
and a cordial acknowledgment of them, in the light of the divine character and law, 
is essential to belief and hearty reception of the most important doctrines of the 
gospel. And it will doubtless be found, on proper examination, that all the gross 
errors respecting the gospel, which are, or have been embraced, and propagated, 
have originated from ignorance of the law of God, and the nature and ill desert 
of sin, and an express or implicit denial of these.</p></note></p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.iv.iii-p7">The new man discerns the character of Christ, and the way of salvation 
by him, with entire approbation, and great pleasure, and believes the gospel with 
all his heart, and flies to the Redeemer, as the only hope for sinners; trusting 
in him alone for pardon, righteousness, strength and redemption. And his benevolent 
love to God and man is in the highest degree pleased <pb n="464" id="iv.iv.iii-Page_464" />with the gospel, 
which establishes, magnifies and honours the law, and brings honour to God in the 
pardon and salvation of sinful, lost men, who believe on the Saviour. Conversion 
is turning from a state of obstinacy and disobedience, to a cordial submission and 
obedience to Christ. The real convert says as Saul did when he was renewed, “Lord, 
what wilt thou have me to do?” This is necessarily implied in repentance and faith. 
A new heart is an obedient heart; therefore obedience cannot be separated from a 
new heart; and they are indeed one and the same thing. Consequently they are put 
together as implying each other, and being really the same in the words of inspiration. 
“A new heart will I give you, and I will put my Spirit within you, and cause you 
to walk in my statutes, and ye shall keep my judgments, and do them.”<note n="508" id="iv.iv.iii-p7.1"><p class="normal" id="iv.iv.iii-p8"><scripRef id="iv.iv.iii-p8.1" passage="Ezek. xxxvi. 26" parsed="|Ezek|36|26|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Ezek.36.26">Ezek. 
xxxvi. 26</scripRef>, <scripRef passage="Ezek 36:27" id="iv.iv.iii-p8.2" parsed="|Ezek|36|27|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Ezek.36.27">27</scripRef>.</p></note> The new heart consists in love, as has been shown, and all 
holy obedience consists in this. It is love expressed and acted out in all proper 
ways.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.iv.iii-p9">This leads to observe farther, that this love, which is the new 
creation, or the new creature, has not only the supreme Being for its object; but 
creatures also, who are capable of happiness. It wishes well to every such creature, 
so far as their good and happiness is consistent with the greatest public, general 
good, and no farther; for universal benevolence seeks the greatest good of the whole; 
and therefore is ready to give up, not to desire, but to renounce the good and happiness 
of individuals, when, and as far as it is inconsistent with the greatest good of 
the whole, all beings and all things taken into view. And as the good man is not 
capable of determining with any certainty that it is inconsistent with the greatest 
good of the whole that any who are on the stage of life with him should be happy, 
his benevolence will extend to all, and will wish them well, and pray for all men, 
even his enemies, if he have any. But his benevolence will be more particularly, 
and in a stronger degree exercised towards those who are most in his view, with 
whom he is most acquainted, whose wants, dangers and miseries, and whose capacity 
of happiness are most in his sight; and those who are more especially <pb n="465" id="iv.iv.iii-Page_465" />
under his care, and to whom he is under advantage, and has more opportunity to do 
good. And he will feel himself united, in a peculiar degree, and with a more fervent 
love, to those who appear to him to be benevolent and engaged in desiring and promoting 
the greatest general good, in the exercise of true love to God and man. As such 
who are friends to God and his kingdom, to Jesus Christ, and the greatest public 
good, appear to the benevolent to have more real existence than others, and to be 
of much more importance in the scale of being, and are objects of the peculiar benevolence 
of the Deity; they are in this view peculiarly dear to them, and excellent in their 
eyes; and they embrace them with a distinguishing, strong and sweet, benevolent 
and complacential love.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.iv.iii-p10">Having given a more general view of conversion, which is the effect 
of the regenerating influences of the Holy Spirit, and which consists in the volitions 
and actions of the regenerate, it is of importance that what has been mentioned, 
should be more particularly explained; which will be attempted in the following 
sections.</p>

</div3>

<div3 title="Section IV. On Disinterested Affection." prev="iv.iv.iii" next="iv.iv.v" id="iv.iv.iv">

<h2 id="iv.iv.iv-p0.1">Section IV.</h2>
<p class="center" id="iv.iv.iv-p1"><i>On Disinterested Affection</i>.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.iv.iv-p2">IT has been already shown that moral depravity, or sin, consists 
in self love; and that holiness consists in disinterested benevolence, which is, 
in the nature of it, and in all its exercises, wholly contrary and opposed to self 
love. [See Part I. Chap. VIII. page 277, &amp;c. to which the reader is referred.] But 
as this is a subject so very important, and necessary to be well understood, in 
order properly to distinguish true religion, and real conversion, from that which 
is not so, but false religion, and mere delusion, it is thought proper to bring 
it again into view here, in order farther to explain and confirm this truth, which 
is overlooked by too many, and opposed by others.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.iv.iv-p3">Not a few have believed and asserted, that there is no such thing 
in nature as disinterested affections; and that <pb n="466" id="iv.iv.iv-Page_466" />all the actions of 
men flow from self love, as their foundation and source. Others allow that disinterested 
affection may take place in the human heart; but that it either springs from self 
love, and is grafted upon it; or so coincides with it, and regulates it, that both 
these sorts of affection, if they do really differ in their nature, are included 
in the exercises of true holiness; and that self love is the real foundation of 
all true religion.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.iv.iv-p4">These sentiments and pleas in favour of self love, it is believed, 
are owing, in many instances, to wrong or confused ideas, and not properly distinguishing 
between self love, and that which is of a different nature and kind.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.iv.iv-p5"><i>First</i>. Many do not appear to distinguish between self love, 
and a desire or love of happiness; or a capacity of pleasure and enjoyment, and 
of being pleased with and choosing one object, rather than another. These are quite 
distinct and different things: The latter is really nothing but a capacity or power 
of will and choice, for without this there could be no such thing as preferring 
one object to another, or exercise of choice. This therefore is essential to the 
existence of a moral agent, or to any act of will whatever, and is neither self 
love, nor disinterested affection, but necessary to both. Self love consists in 
a moral agent’s placing his happiness in what he views as his own private personal 
interest, and in nothing else, in distinction from the interest or happiness of 
any other being, and in contradiction to it. This only pleases him, for its own 
sake, and is the ultimated object of all his desires and exertions.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.iv.iv-p6">Disinterested benevolence is pleased with the public interest, 
the greatest good and happiness of the whole. This is the highest good to the benevolent 
person. In this he places his happiness, and not in the interest and happiness of 
any individual, or of himself, any farther than it is consistent with the greatest 
interest and happiness of the whole, and really included in it, and serves to promote 
it. in this state of the case, is it not easy to see the distinction between a capacity 
of pleasure and choice, or being pleased, and enjoying happiness; and placing our 
happiness in our own personal good and interest only; or in the public good for 
its own sake? <pb n="467" id="iv.iv.iv-Page_467" />And who docs not see the difference and opposition between 
the two latter?</p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.iv.iv-p7"><i>Secondly</i>. By many there is not a proper distinction made, 
and kept in view, between self-love, and that regard which the benevolent person 
must have for himself and his interest and happiness, which is necessarily included 
in disinterested affection. Disinterested, impartial benevolence, to being in general 
that is capable of good and happiness, regards and wishes well to every being and 
creature in the system, according to the degree of his existence, worth and capacity 
of happiness, so far as all this comes into the view of the benevolent person, and 
so far as the good and happiness of each is, or appears to be, consistent with the 
greatest good of the whole. And as he himself is one individual part of the whole, 
he must of necessity be the object of this disinterested, impartial benevolence, 
and his own interest and happiness must be regarded and desired, as much as that 
of his neighbour, or any individual of the whole society; not because it is <i>himself</i>, 
but because he is included in the whole, and his happiness is worth as much, and 
as desirable as that of his neighbour, other circumstances being equal. This is 
not self love; but the same universal, disinterested, impartial, public benevolence, 
which wishes well to being in general, and therefore to himself, because he has 
an existence, and is one among the rest, and equal to his neighbour. This is loving 
his neighbour as himself; not with the least degree of self love; but with the same 
disinterested, public affection, with which he loves being in general. The least 
spark of self love will interrupt this reasonable and beautiful moral order and 
harmony, and render him partial and interested in his affection, and so far detach 
him from the whole and make him set up a selfish, private interest of his own, in 
distinction from that of the rest, and in opposition to it.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.iv.iv-p8">By not making this distinction, and not attending to the nature 
of disinterested benevolence, as it regards the interest of the benevolent person 
himself; and therefore taking it for granted, that all the regard a person has for 
himself and desire of his own happiness is self love, in distinction from disinterested 
benevolence, they have <pb n="468" id="iv.iv.iv-Page_468" />concluded with great assurance, that self love 
is essential to man, and even his duty. But when the distinction is properly made, 
and the matter plainly stated, the mistake is discovered, and it appears that disinterested 
benevolence will take all proper and sufficient care of every individual in the 
system, and will desire and seek the best interest and happiness of all, and of 
the benevolent person himself, so far as is consistent with the greatest good of 
the whole: And that this is not self love, but the same disinterested, impartial 
benevolence, when it takes into view his own happiness, and values and seeks it 
as much as that of his neighbour. The self love which can be distinguished from 
this universal, disinterested benevolence, and is not of this kind, cannot be distinguished 
from selfishness; but is the very same affection, and is directly and wholly opposed 
to disinterested, holy love: And is, as has been observed, the root and essence 
of all sin.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.iv.iv-p9">To distinguish between self love and selfishness is to attempt 
to make a distinction where there is no difference; unless by self love be meant 
disinterested benevolence. Disinterested affection and self love are very distinct 
and opposite affections, and the latter, in every degree of it, cannot be distinguished 
from selfishness: For these are two words, for one and the same thing. Some would 
distinguish between inordinate and well regulated self love; and suppose the former 
is selfishness and sinful; but the latter innocent, and even good and virtuous. 
But unless by well regulated self love be meant disinterested affection, the distinction 
is groundless and vain. And to suppose a certain degree of self love, subordinated 
to a contrary affection, love to God, and to our neighbour, is virtuous, or even 
innocent; and that the same self love in a higher degree of it, and not subordinated 
by a different and contrary affection, is sinful, is very unreasonable and absurd, 
and a supposition which is utterly impossible. For if holiness and sin do not consist 
in the nature of moral affection and exercise, there can be no such thing as either 
sin or holiness. And to suppose these opposites to consist in the degree of the 
same affection exercised, and not in different kinds of affection, is really to 
make them not opposites, <pb n="469" id="iv.iv.iv-Page_469" />or not to differ in nature and kind; but 
to be one and the same thing, under different modifications. For the nature and 
kind of moral exercise and affection is not changed by their being more or less 
of it, or by being under restraints or not. If the lowest degree of such affection 
be innocent and good, the highest possible degree of it must be so much better, 
and have a proportionably greater degree of moral goodness. And if the highest possible 
degree of such affection be sinful and wrong, the least possible degree of the same 
kind of affection must in the nature of it be sinful, though less in degree. If 
ten or a hundred degrees of self love be enmity against God, and contrary to uprightness 
and disinterested benevolence to men, and a disposition of mind to injure them; 
then one degree of this same self love is enmity against God, and opposite to benevolence 
to men in its nature, and in proportion to the degree of it. And though it may be 
under restraints, and counteracted by opposite affection, it is yet of the same 
nature, and the same kind of affection, and as really opposes the general good, 
which disinterested benevolence seeks, as that same self love, when it is under 
no restraint, and reigns as the only moral affection of the heart.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.iv.iv-p10">Therefore in the scriptures we find no such distinction between 
self love and selfishness; or between well regulated self love, and that which is 
inordinate, or between a less and greater degree of this same affection, representing 
one as innocent and good, and the other sinful: But self love is condemned in every 
degree of it, in all its exercises and fruits. No worse character is given of men 
than this, that they are <i>lovers of their own selves</i>. And men are commanded 
not to seek their own wealth, and mind their own things, in distinction from those 
of others, and of Jesus Christ, and condemned for doing it. And that love, which
<i>seeketh not her own</i>, is recommended as that only in which true religion or 
real holiness does consist: And surely there can be no self love in that love which
<i>seeketh not her own</i>.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.iv.iv-p11">This leads to what is chiefly designed in this section, viz. to 
prove from scripture that disinterested affection, or benevolence to being in general, 
and all the affection <pb n="470" id="iv.iv.iv-Page_470" />which this implies, as it has been now explained, 
is that in which true religion, or the new creature does summarily consist.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.iv.iv-p12">1. It has been observed and shewn in the chapter to which reference 
is made in the beginning of this section, that this may be proved from what is said 
by the apostle John.<note n="509" id="iv.iv.iv-p12.1"><p class="normal" id="iv.iv.iv-p13"><scripRef passage="1John 4:8" id="iv.iv.iv-p13.1" parsed="|1John|4|8|0|0" osisRef="Bible:1John.4.8">1 John iv.</scripRef></p></note> 
He says “God is love;” in which he evidently designs to comprehend his whole moral 
character. He mentions the highest exercise, and greatest manifestation of this 
love. This, he says, is in giving the Son of God to die for the redemption of sinners. 
This, all will grant, is, in the highest sense and degree, disinterested benevolence, 
as it is exercised towards those who are not only unworthy and ill deserving, but 
unreasonable and abusive enemies. This disinterested benevolence he urges christians 
to imitate; and represents it as that in which Christianity summarily consists; 
for he says, he that loveth is born of God, and this love being perfect, casteth 
out fear; and he who exercises this disinterested benevolence, (for he is speaking 
of no other love but this) he who dwelleth in this love, dwelleth in God, and God 
in him. That is, the moral image and character of God is formed in him, he partakes 
of the divine nature, and he is united to God, and God to him. This leads to observe, 
that as the new creature is a conformity to the moral character and image of God, 
by which Christ is said to dwell in believers; it must consist in disinterested 
benevolent affection; for in this only can christians be like God.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.iv.iv-p14">2. Jesus Christ is a remarkable and striking instance of disinterested 
benevolence, in which christians are to imitate him; and do so, as far as they are 
christians.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.iv.iv-p15">The love which he exercised, in taking man’s place, and dying 
for him, is in the highest sense disinterested, as he suffered this for men, when 
they were his enemies. “God commandeth his love toward us, in that while we were 
yet sinners, Christ died for us.” His love to the Father, and to sinners, expressed 
in what he did and suffered, is represented as wholly disinterested, to set forth 
the nature and excellency of it, and recommend it as a pattern to be followed by 
his disciples. “We then <pb n="471" id="iv.iv.iv-Page_471" />that are strong ought to bear the infirmities 
of the weak, <i>and not to please ourselves</i>: For even Christ <i>pleased not 
himself</i>; but as it is written, “The reproaches of them that reproached thee, 
fell on me.”<note n="510" id="iv.iv.iv-p15.1"><p class="normal" id="iv.iv.iv-p16"><scripRef id="iv.iv.iv-p16.1" passage="Rom. xv. 1" parsed="|Rom|15|1|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Rom.15.1">Rom. xv. 1</scripRef>, <scripRef passage="Rom 15:3" id="iv.iv.iv-p16.2" parsed="|Rom|15|3|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Rom.15.3">3</scripRef>.</p></note> By his not pleasing himself, is meant his 
not seeking himself, or acting from self love: The same that is intended by his 
not seeking and doing <i>his own will</i>, but the will of his Father; and saying, “Not my will, but thine be done.”<note n="511" id="iv.iv.iv-p16.3"><p class="normal" id="iv.iv.iv-p17"><scripRef id="iv.iv.iv-p17.1" passage="John v. 30" parsed="|John|5|30|0|0" osisRef="Bible:John.5.30">John v. 30</scripRef>. <scripRef passage="John 6:38" id="iv.iv.iv-p17.2" parsed="|John|6|38|0|0" osisRef="Bible:John.6.38">
vi. 38</scripRef>.</p></note> That he did not please himself, but acted from a disinterested 
regard to the glory of God, is proved by the quotation the apostle here makes, “The 
reproaches of them that reproached thee, <i>fell on me</i>.” He had such a disinterested 
regard to the honour of God, that if he were reproached, It was the same to him, 
as if he himself were reproached. This St. Paul mentions as an example for christians, 
which they are to imitate by feeling for their brethren in all the unhappiness that 
attends them, so as to bear their infirmities and burdens.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.iv.iv-p18">Again, in order to excite the Corinthians to show the sincerity, 
or genuineness of their love to the saints, that is, their disinterested benevolence, 
he mentions to them the example of Christ, and his love. “For ye know the grace 
of our Lord Jesus Christ, that though he was rich, yet <i>for your sakes</i>, he 
became poor, that you, through his poverty, might be rich.”<note n="512" id="iv.iv.iv-p18.1"><p class="normal" id="iv.iv.iv-p19"><scripRef id="iv.iv.iv-p19.1" passage="2 Cor. viii. 8" parsed="|2Cor|8|8|0|0" osisRef="Bible:2Cor.8.8">2 Cor. viii. 8</scripRef>, 
<scripRef passage="2 Cor. 8:9" id="iv.iv.iv-p19.2" parsed="|2Cor|8|9|0|0" osisRef="Bible:2Cor.8.9">9</scripRef>.</p></note> He recommends the example of Christ, in this same view of it, to the Philippians.<note n="513" id="iv.iv.iv-p19.3"><p class="normal" id="iv.iv.iv-p20">
<scripRef id="iv.iv.iv-p20.1" passage="Phil. ii. 4" parsed="|Phil|2|4|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Phil.2.4">Phil. ii. 4</scripRef>, <scripRef passage="Phil 2:5" id="iv.iv.iv-p20.2" parsed="|Phil|2|5|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Phil.2.5">5</scripRef>, <scripRef passage="Phil 2:6" id="iv.iv.iv-p20.3" parsed="|Phil|2|6|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Phil.2.6">6</scripRef>, <scripRef passage="Phil 2:7" id="iv.iv.iv-p20.4" parsed="|Phil|2|7|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Phil.2.7">7</scripRef>, <scripRef passage="Phil 2:8" id="iv.iv.iv-p20.5" parsed="|Phil|2|8|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Phil.2.8">8</scripRef>.</p></note></p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.iv.iv-p21">There are indeed, but few, if any christians, who do not consider 
the Saviour as acting a most disinterested part, in doing and suffering what he 
did for the salvation of sinners, as he could not have undertaken, and gone through 
it, from any other principle but disinterested benevolence: And this is considered 
as the highest excellency and perfection of his love. If any of those admit at the 
same time, that the love of christians, in whom is the same spirit that was in Christ, 
is not disinterested, they must be very inconsistent with themselves, as well as 
with the scripture.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.iv.iv-p22">3. That disinterested affection is essential to a disciple of 
Christ appears from the words of our Saviour, <pb n="472" id="iv.iv.iv-Page_472" />recorded by Matthew.<note n="514" id="iv.iv.iv-p22.1"><p class="normal" id="iv.iv.iv-p23"><scripRef passage="Mt 5:43" id="iv.iv.iv-p23.1" parsed="|Matt|5|43|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Matt.5.43">
Chap. v. 43</scripRef>, &amp;c.</p></note> He there tells his disciples, that loving their 
relations, and those who loved them, did not difference them from other men, even 
the worst of them; because self love would do this. That therefore they could not 
be the children of God, or have the least degree of likeness to his moral character, 
unless they had, and exercised that disinterested benevolence, which would extend 
to their enemies, even the worst of them, and whatever injuries they had done to 
them; which would wish them well, and pray for them, while they were doing them 
all the harm they could do. That by this alone, they would be like their Father 
in heaven; and by being perfect in this, they would be perfect, even as he is perfect. 
The love here recommended, as so essential to a christian, and by which alone he 
is distinguished from other men, is disinterested, universal benevolence, as opposed 
to self love; for no other affection is opposed to self love, or will love our enemies, 
with cordial friendly desires of their good and happiness, leading us to do them 
all the good we can.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.iv.iv-p24">4. Our Saviour has enjoined disinterested affection, as that by 
which alone, men can follow him, and be his disciples, in the following words, “If 
any man will come after me, let him <i>deny himself</i>, and take up his cross, 
and follow me.”<note n="515" id="iv.iv.iv-p24.1"><p class="normal" id="iv.iv.iv-p25"><scripRef id="iv.iv.iv-p25.1" passage="Matt. xvi. 24" parsed="|Matt|16|24|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Matt.16.24">Matt. xvi. 24</scripRef>.</p></note> It will be difficult for any one to 
tell how a man can deny himself, in the exercise of self love; for this is in every 
degree of it self gratification. Therefore to deny ourselves, is to remove all self 
love, and to exercise that disinterested, universal love to being in general, which 
opposes self love, and renounces all selfish, private interest, and knows no <i>
self</i>, as such; it being an impartial affection, it respects him who exercises 
it only as belonging to being in general, and included in universal existence. As 
the excellency of Christ consists in this disinterested love, no one will come to 
him, and cordially follow him, unless it be in the exercise of this same disinterested 
affection; for without this, none can approve of his character, which self love 
opposes.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.iv.iv-p26">5. St. Paul decides this matter in the most express terms, and 
asserts that all the exercises of true religion <pb n="473" id="iv.iv.iv-Page_473" />consist in disinterested 
affection, in that love which <i>seeketh not her own</i>.<note n="516" id="iv.iv.iv-p26.1"><p class="normal" id="iv.iv.iv-p27"><scripRef passage="1Cor 13:5" id="iv.iv.iv-p27.1" parsed="|1Cor|13|5|0|0" osisRef="Bible:1Cor.13.5">
1 Cor. xiii.</scripRef></p></note> He represents love as containing the whole of christian 
affection, without which there is nothing of any moral worth, or of real Christianity. 
And in describing this love, he says, “It seeketh not her own.” Q.D. It is not self 
love which seeketh her own, and nothing else; but is directly opposed to this, and 
consists in that affection which is perfectly disinterested, which is universal 
benevolence to being in general, and has not the least partiality in favour of self. 
This is the wisdom that is from above, which is “Pure, peaceable, gentle, 
easy to be entreated, f<i>ull of mercy and good fruits, without partiality</i> and 
hypocrisy.”<note n="517" id="iv.iv.iv-p27.2"><p class="normal" id="iv.iv.iv-p28"><scripRef id="iv.iv.iv-p28.1" passage="James iii. 17" parsed="|Jas|3|17|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Jas.3.17">James iii. 17</scripRef>.</p></note></p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.iv.iv-p29">6. That all true religion, or holy exercises of heart, consist 
in disinterested affection, is evident to a certainty, from the summary of the law 
of God, given by Christ himself, in the following words. “Thou shalt love the Lord 
thy God with all thy heart, and with all thy soul, and with all thy mind. This is 
the first and great commandment. And the second is like unto it. Thou shalt love 
thy neighbour as thyself. On these two commandments hang all the law and the prophets.”<note n="518" id="iv.iv.iv-p29.1"><p class="normal" id="iv.iv.iv-p30">
<scripRef id="iv.iv.iv-p30.1" passage="Matt. xxii. 37" parsed="|Matt|22|37|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Matt.22.37">Matt. xxii. 37</scripRef>, <scripRef passage="Matt 22:58" id="iv.iv.iv-p30.2" parsed="|Matt|22|58|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Matt.22.58">58</scripRef>, <scripRef passage="Matt 22:39" id="iv.iv.iv-p30.3" parsed="|Matt|22|39|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Matt.22.39">39</scripRef>, <scripRef passage="Matt 22:40" id="iv.iv.iv-p30.4" parsed="|Matt|22|40|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Matt.22.40">40</scripRef>.</p></note></p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.iv.iv-p31">The law of God is a transcript of his moral perfection; for by 
the creature’s obeying it, he partakes of the divine nature, and puts on the moral 
image of God. But the moral character of God consists in disinterested love, as 
has been shown; therefore the love required in the law of God, is disinterested 
affection: It is not self love, but that which is entirely contrary to selfishness. 
He who loves God <i>with all his heart, strength and mind</i>, can have no self 
love, nor any love to himself, or any creature, but that which is implied in this, 
which certainly must be disinterested, as his love to God is. For disinterested 
love to God cannot imply interested and selfish affection to any other being, even 
our own, but necessarily excludes it. And it has been shown that the command to 
love our neighbour as ourselves, is so far from approving, or supposing self love, 
that it necessarily excludes every thing of this kind; as it requires that <pb n="474" id="iv.iv.iv-Page_474" />
impartiality, and uprightness, which is contrary to every degree of self love, and 
can exist in nothing but disinterested affection. Men are no farther converted, 
than they are conformed in the exercise and affection of their hearts to the law 
of God, which requires disinterested love, and nothing else, and excludes and forbids 
ail selfishness, or self love, which is the same. Therefore the new heart, and all 
truly christian exercises, consist in <span class="sc" id="iv.iv.iv-p31.1">disinterested affection</span>.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.iv.iv-p32">Before this subject of disinterested affection is dismissed, to 
prevent mistakes, and that the nature of it may be farther explained, the following 
particulars are to be observed and kept in view.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.iv.iv-p33">1. This disinterested benevolence regards the interest and happiness 
of those who are nearest and most in sight, more strongly and tenderly, than of 
those who are farther off, and more out of sight; and is more affected with the 
happiness or misery, and the good or bad character of the former, than of the latter.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.iv.iv-p34">The mind of man is not omniscient, and cannot have a full, comprehensive 
view of all men, and their circumstances at the same time; therefore those who are 
nearest to him, and most in his sight, must be more the objects of his benevolence, 
than others: And it is reasonable, and therefore his duty to regard these more than 
others, as they are more in his view, and he has a special care of them, and is 
under greater advantage to think of them, and do them good. And impartial, disinterested 
affection, will naturally, and even necessarily, operate thus.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.iv.iv-p35">He who has universal benevolence will have a greater regard for 
the inhabitants of the nation to which he belongs, and be more concerned for their 
interest, than for those of other nations. He will have a greater regard still for 
the inhabitants of the town and neighbourhood in which he lives, other things being 
equal. Consequently his benevolent care of the members of the family to which be 
belongs, will be exercised in a higher degree, and more constantly, and with greater 
sensibility, than towards those of other families; especially if he be the head 
of it. And as every person is nearest to himself, and is most in his own view, has 
opportunity <pb n="475" id="iv.iv.iv-Page_475" />to be better acquainted with his own circumstances, and 
to know his own wants, his mercies and enjoyments, &amp;:c. and has a more particular 
care of his own interest, than of that of others; and is under greater advantage 
to promote his own happiness, than others; his disinterested, universal benevolence, 
will attend more to his own interest, and he will have more and stronger exercises 
of it, respecting his own circumstances and happiness, than those of others, all 
other things being equal; not because it is <i>his own</i> interest, but for the 
reason just given. And were the case reversed, and the circumstances, wants and 
interests of others, were more in his view, and more under his care, than his own, 
he would pay more regard to them, and have greater concern for them, and their interest 
and happiness, than for his own, all other circumstances being alike.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.iv.iv-p36">It hence appears that universal benevolence to being in general, 
not only includes a regard for the interest of every individual, and therefore an 
equal regard for our own interest; but a special and peculiar regard for the latter, 
and for that of the family, neighbourhood and town, and all those with whom we have 
any special connection. And this regard for ourselves, our own interest and happiness, 
which is necessarily included in universal benevolence, is not only a proper and 
reasonable regard, but is discerning, wise and judicious, and seeks our true interest. 
Whereas self love is partial and unreasonable in its own nature, and in every degree 
of it; and blinds men to their own true interest and happiness, and seeks happiness 
where it is not to be found; and as certainly and effectually renders them miserable, 
as if it were ill will to themselves.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.iv.iv-p37">2. As the great object of disinterested affection, or benevolence 
to being in general, is the greatest good of the whole, and it devotes all to this, 
it will give up any less good for the greater good, and the interest of individuals, 
for the sake of the greater public interest, and greatest good of the whole, when, 
and so far as the former is inconsistent with the latter. And the benevolent person 
is disposed and willing to give up and relinquish his own interest and happiness, 
when inconsistent with the public good, or the greatest good of the <pb n="476" id="iv.iv.iv-Page_476" />
whole; or when this may be necessary to promote a greater good, or more happiness, 
on the whole, than that of which he deprives himself. Yea, he will be willing to 
suffer positive evil, to save others, or the public from greater evil, or when necessary 
to promote and procure a greater and overbalancing good, on the whole. This is the 
nature of disinterested affection, and essential to it, which appears from what 
has been said of it above. In this the opposition and contrariety between holy love, 
and self love appears. He who has the former devotes, all to the greatest good of 
the whole; and gives up the interest of individuals, and his own interest, when 
necessary, to promote the good of the whole; and desires not his own happiness, 
or that of any other particular person, if inconsistent with a greater good to others, 
or with the greatest public good: And is willing to suffer, and that other particular 
persons should suffer, any deserved evil, which is necessary to prevent a greater 
public evil; or to promote the greater good of others, and of the whole. On the 
contrary, he who is under the government of self love, and so far as he is influenced 
by this, seeks, and is wholly devoted to his own personal, private interest, as 
the supreme good, placing all good and happiness in this; and therefore will not 
give up and relinquish his own supposed interest, or any part or degree of it, for 
the sake of the interest and happiness of any other being in the universe; their 
good and interest being nothing to him, no object of his desires and wishes, any 
farther than he thinks his own selfish good is connected with theirs, and promoted 
by it. Consequently, he, in the feelings and exercises of his heart, subordinates 
the whole interest of the universe, and of every other being, to his own little, 
personal, selfish interest, and wishes no good to any one, or to the whole any farther 
than it may promote his own selfish ends, and turn to his own advantage. And were 
sell love under no restraints, but were acted out fully agreeable to the nature 
of it, it would give up and destroy all the good and happiness of the universe, 
and of ever) other being but the selfish person, and bring universal evil and misery 
on all, were this possible, in order to gain die least supposed advantage to himself. 
This is the <pb n="477" id="iv.iv.iv-Page_477" />true character of them who are, “lovers of their own selves.”</p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.iv.iv-p38">This view of disinterested affection will give in some measure, 
the distinguishing character and properties of the new creature. It consists in 
the love of benevolence, which implies all that disinterested affection, m the exercise 
of which the true convert loves God with all his heart, and his neighbour as himself. 
It implies repentance, faith in Jesus Christ, joy in God, in the Redeemer, humility, 
resignation to the divine will: A cheerful and pleasing dedication of himself, and 
of every thing with which he has any concern, to Christ, his interest and honour, 
and to be disposed of and used by him, in the way which he sees best, to answer 
his own infinitely wise designs; which shall in the highest degree possible promote 
the divine glory, and the greatest happiness of his kingdom. It is true wisdom, 
which discerns and pursues the only objects worthy to be desired and sought. It 
is goodness and truth, putting on bowels of mercies, kindness, humbleness of mind, 
meekness, temperance and sobriety. It is heavenly minded, setting the affection 
on things above, not on things on the earth, &amp;c. &amp;c.</p>
<h2 id="iv.iv.iv-p38.1">IMPROVEMENT.</h2>
<p class="normal" id="iv.iv.iv-p39">1. <span class="sc" id="iv.iv.iv-p39.1">From</span> this scriptural and rational view 
of disinterested affection, in which all true virtue, piety and charity consist, 
may be seen what a great and dangerous mistake they have made, who suppose that 
there is no virtue or true religion, but that which consists in self love, or originates 
from it; and that no man ever acts or can act from any higher or other principle, 
whatever he may think or pretend. Surely these “call evil good, and good evil; put 
darkness for light, and light for darkness; bitter for sweet, and sweet for bitter.”<note n="519" id="iv.iv.iv-p39.2"><p class="normal" id="iv.iv.iv-p40">
<scripRef id="iv.iv.iv-p40.1" passage="Isaiah v. 20" parsed="|Isa|5|20|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Isa.5.20">Isaiah v. 20</scripRef>.</p></note> 
They call that virtue and goodness, which is directly opposed to all true virtue 
and goodness; and in which all moral evil consists. They call the only moral good, 
evil. They say there is no such thing as disinterested 
<pb n="478" id="iv.iv.iv-Page_478" />affection, and if there were, it must be evil. And all appearance 
of it, or pretension to it, is nothing but hypocrisy or delusion. They put that 
for light and wisdom, which is darkness itself, in which all moral darkness consists. 
They recommend and delight in that, as the source of all happiness, which is the 
most odious thing in nature, and is the source of all the mischief and misery among 
creatures.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.iv.iv-p41">It is true, that mankind in general appear to act from no higher 
or better principle than self love. But this affords not the least evidence that 
man is not capable of disinterested affection, or that self love is not the essence 
and substance of all sin. It is indeed an evidence that the account the scripture 
gives of man is true, that he is naturally totally depraved, and wholly corrupt: 
And that he must be renewed by the Spirit of God, in order to his becoming in the 
least degree virtuous and holy.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.iv.iv-p42">II. <span class="sc" id="iv.iv.iv-p42.1">We</span> hence learn how false and pernicious 
that doctrine is, which too many have held and asserted, viz. that true love to 
God originates from a knowledge or belief that he loves us, and designs to make 
us happy: Or that a man cannot love God, unless he first has evidence that God loves 
him with a design to save him. This is excluding disinterested affection entirely, 
and making all religious affection to consist in self love; for that love to any 
being which is wholly owing to a knowledge or belief that he loves us, is nothing 
but self love. Our Saviour therefore condemns this, as not true christian love; 
but a love which may be found in the most selfish, wicked man. He says, “If 
ye love them which love you, what thanks have ye? For sinners also love those that 
love them.”<note n="520" id="iv.iv.iv-p42.2"><p class="normal" id="iv.iv.iv-p43"><scripRef id="iv.iv.iv-p43.1" passage="Luke vi. 32" parsed="|Luke|6|32|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Luke.6.32">Luke vi. 32</scripRef>.</p></note> There is no need that a man should be regenerated 
and born of the Spirit of God, in order to his loving God, so far as he is persuaded 
that God loves him, with a design to save him from eternal destruction, and make 
him happy forever. This is consistent with being a real enemy to the divine character: 
And the greatest enemy to God will do this, without any change of heart for the 
better. And if any person has no other love to God but this, it is certain he has 
not a new heart, <pb n="479" id="iv.iv.iv-Page_479" />is not converted, and has not the Spirit of God; 
but all his religious affection and devotion is nothing but wickedness, and enmity 
against God and his law.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.iv.iv-p44">He who has a new heart, and universal disinterested benevolence, 
will be a friend to God, and must be pleased with his infinitely benevolent character, 
though he see not the least evidence, and has not a thought that God loves him, 
and designs to save him. And if he could know that God designed, for his own glory 
and the general good, to cast him into endless destruction; this would not make 
him cease to approve of his character; he would continue to be a friend of God, 
and to be pleased with his moral perfection. And he would, even on this supposition, 
and in this case, exercise true gratitude to God for all the good he had received 
or did now enjoy, and for his great and wonderful love to the world, in providing 
salvation for man. For benevolence exercised and manifested in doing good is the 
object of gratitude, and will excite it in him who has disinterested benevolent 
affection, though he receives no personal benefit by it.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.iv.iv-p45">Therefore they who cannot love God, unless he first manifest to 
them that he is their friend, and designs to save them, are the unregenerate, who 
have no disinterested affection; but are wholly selfish in all their religious exercises 
and affections; and their religion, whatever appearance it may put on, is false 
and destructive.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.iv.iv-p46">But if such love to God as this were true love, and real piety, 
it is impossible it should ever take place. For God has not discovered, and never 
will discover to any man, that he loves him, and will save him, who has no love 
to God: It is impossible therefore that he who does not now love God should have 
any real good evidence from any quarter that God loves him, or that he shall be 
saved. He must first love God in order to have any evidence that God will not destroy 
him forever. He therefore who cannot love God until he has evidence, and God discovers 
to him that he shall be saved, never can be brought to love him; because this discovery 
never w ill be made to him, so long as he does not love God; and if he thinks he 
has had such a disco very, it is mere delusion, and he is made to believe a <pb n="480" id="iv.iv.iv-Page_480" />
lie: Consequently all his love to God is built on a falsehood and delusion. So that 
they who can have no love to God, unless he first discovers to them that he intends 
to save them, and think they have had such a discovery, and from this they began, 
and continue to love him, are deluded two ways, and in two respects. Their supposed 
discovery that God loves them, and will save them, and their belief of this, is 
altogether a delusion, and they only believe a lie. But if this were a true and 
real discovery, and this were possible, yet their love and religious affection which 
is wholly founded on this discovery, and they love God only because he loves them, 
and for no other reason, has no moral goodness in it; it is nothing but self love, 
and therefore nothing but sin: And such cannot be saved, or enjoy God, nor can God 
love them unless they have new hearts given them, by which this same self love will 
be destroyed, in a degree at least, and disinterested affection takes place, which 
will be friendly to God, and love him, whether he be friendly to them, or not.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.iv.iv-p47">An expression of St. John has been often produced to confront 
what has been now advanced; and to prove that the only ground and reason of christians 
loving God, is a belief of his love to them. This is in the following words, “We 
love him because he first loved us.”<note n="521" id="iv.iv.iv-p47.1"><p class="normal" id="iv.iv.iv-p48"><scripRef id="iv.iv.iv-p48.1" passage="1 John iv. 9" parsed="|1John|4|9|0|0" osisRef="Bible:1John.4.9">1 John iv. 9</scripRef>.</p></note> 
It is of importance carefully to consider what is the real meaning of these words 
of inspiration, lest by inattention or prejudice we should put a wrong sense upon 
them, and overlook the truth which is designed to be communicated by them. It has 
been observed, that in this context the apostle is considering and recommending 
the love of God in giving his Son to die for the redemption of sinners, and urging 
christians to imitate this love, which is certainly disinterested love; love to 
men while they hated God, and not love to them because they loved him. Christians 
therefore could not imitate the love of God here recommended, by loving him purely 
because he loved them; for this would be so far from imitating the love of God, 
that it would be only an exercise of self love, which is in nature and kind directly 
opposed to the disinterested love of God. Therefore <pb n="481" id="iv.iv.iv-Page_481" />the apostle cannot 
here mean to recommend self love, or interested affection; and assert that the only 
ground and reason of their love to God, was the manifestation and evidence given 
to them that God loved them; and that they had good evidence that God loved them, 
and designed to save them, before they began to love him, and as necessary in order 
to their loving him: Not only because this would be inconsistent with the whole 
context, and make all his reasoning contradictory, futile and absurd; but to suppose 
this, is to make him assert that which is utterly impossible, as has been just now 
observed. Besides, by putting this sense upon these words, they are made inconsistent 
with the other parts of the Bible, which represent the holy love of christians to 
consist in disinterested affection, in opposition to self love; which, it is presumed, 
has been made evident in this section. Moreover, by understanding these words in 
this sense, they stand in direct contradiction to the assertion of our Saviour, 
viz. That to love those who love us, and that purely because they love us, is not 
a virtuous, holy love, but that which the worst of men may have. “For if ye 
love them which love you, what thank have ye? For sinners also love those that love 
them.”<note n="522" id="iv.iv.iv-p48.2"><p class="normal" id="iv.iv.iv-p49"><scripRef id="iv.iv.iv-p49.1" passage="Luke vi. 32" parsed="|Luke|6|32|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Luke.6.32">Luke vi. 32</scripRef>.</p></note> It is therefore certain, that those words of the 
Apostle cannot be understood in this sense, without making him contradict himself, 
and to assert that which is inconsistent with all the rest of the Bible, and with 
the plainest dictates of reason and common sense.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.iv.iv-p50">And if another meaning offers itself, which is consistent with 
all those, and which the context points out, and which is a natural and easy sense, 
who will hesitate to embrace it? The Apostle is in this passage celebrating the 
love of God in giving his Son to be a propitiation for the sins of men, as the pattern 
of all holy love. He says, “Herein is love: Not that we loved God; but that he loved 
us, and sent his Son to be a propitiation for our sins.” He refers to the love of 
God as the original ground and cause of all the good which came to them; he loved 
them first, while men were sinners <pb n="482" id="iv.iv.iv-Page_482" />and had no love to him, but were 
his enemies. His love laid the foundation of all good, moral and natural, in man. 
Therefore, “We love him because he first loved us.” That is, had he not been first 
in his love, before we loved him, and opened a way for our reconciliation, by sending 
his Son to be a propitiation for our sins, and by his Spirit regenerated us unto 
holy disinterested love, to which the unrenewed heart is an utter stranger: Had 
he not thus first loved us and done all this for us, we should never have known 
what true disinterested love is. Therefore we are certain that the cause of our 
loving God is his love to us, which has opened the way for it, and actually wrought 
it in us. “We love him, because he loved us,” and gave us the spirit of love in 
our regeneration; for none but those who are born of God do love him. Thus it appears 
that these words perfectly coincide with the whole context, when understood in the 
sense now put upon them; and are very far from asserting that we cannot love God, 
unless we have evidence or believe that he loves us, and designs to save us; or 
that a christian’s love to God originates wholly from a belief that God loves him. 
It does originate from the love of God to him, in the sense now given: It is wholly 
owing to the love and kindness of God, in giving his Son to die for him; and then 
saving him by the washing of regeneration, and renewing of the Holy Ghost. So that 
it is not of him that willeth, nor of him that runneth, but of God who sheweth mercy. 
Had not God first loved him, and done all this for him, he never would have had 
any true love to God.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.iv.iv-p51">III. <span class="sc" id="iv.iv.iv-p51.1">From</span> this subject may be inferred 
the propriety and importance of public teachers constantly and with clearness distinguishing 
between self love, and disinterested affection, and showing that true religion, 
and all holy exercise consists in the latter, and not at all in the former. If this 
be not done, and a clear distinction between these two opposites be not constantly 
made and kept up, true religion cannot be set in a proper light, and distinguished 
from all counterfeits, and they may leave their hearers in ignorance, and lead them 
into deception, in this important matter, and to rest in a religion that is nothing 
more than mere selfishness, and opposition <pb n="483" id="iv.iv.iv-Page_483" />to true holiness. If that 
religion be not taught and inculcated which is opposed to self love: but on the 
contrary, selfish affections are recommended as true holiness, the blind lead the 
blind, and they both are like to fall into the ditch. Mankind, when they turn their 
thoughts to religion, being naturally wholly selfish, are strongly inclined to approve 
and take up with a selfish religion; as this only is agreeable to their hearts. 
They are therefore disposed to like that preaching best which gratifies and flatters 
their self love and pride. And if they are taught that they may be converted and 
be good christians, without denying themselves and crossing their self love; but 
in the full gratification of this; and disinterested affection, or that wherein 
it consists, be spoken of with disapprobation, and condemned as wrong or impossible, 
or is kept wholly out of sight: This tends to confirm them in a delusion, which 
doubtless proves fatal to thousands. The more men are inclined to embrace and be 
satisfied with a selfish religion, the more careful and zealous should public teachers 
be, to oppose it, and detect the delusion, and preach up that pure and undefiled 
religion, which consists in renouncing self, and in the exercise of disinterested 
affection. This would be striking at the root of self love, pride and human depravity, 
and setting holiness in a true and beautiful light. And though such preaching, when 
it is understood, may not please, but offend those who have nothing but self love; 
yet it ought to be inculcated, whether they will hear, or whether they will forbear.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.iv.iv-p52">And it is of importance to keep it in view, that universal benevolence, 
and impartial disinterested goodness is the sum and source of all holy affection, 
as it is all implied and contained in this, by whatever different names it may be 
called, as has been shown. It tends to confuse and mislead the mind on this subject 
of <span class="sc" id="iv.iv.iv-p52.1">love</span>, if when love to God is spoken of and described, 
it is represented as consisting wholly in the love of complacency, and benevolent 
affection is implicitly excluded: Whereas this is the essence of the whole; and 
the love of complacency and of gratitude ought to be considered as the exercise 
of universal, disinterested benevolence, in order to set the subject in the clearest 
light, and to <pb n="484" id="iv.iv.iv-Page_484" />prevent mistakes. Too many who hold the truth on this 
point in theory, or will assent to it, at least, when it is proposed and explained 
to them, yet, when they treat on love to God, do either by the influence of habit 
and custom, or through inattention, leave out all idea of benevolence, as if the 
love of complacency and gratitude were distinct and stood alone, independent of 
universal benevolence. And this is too often the case, when love to our neighbour 
is mentioned. Disinterested benevolence, which is the sum, and comprehends all, 
is overlooked, as if no such affection existed. This is a misrepresentation of love, 
and has an evil tendency.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.iv.iv-p53">IV. <span class="sc" id="iv.iv.iv-p53.1">This</span> subject exhibits a rule by which 
all who suppose themselves to be converted, and real christians, may try their conversion, 
and religious exercises and conduct, in order to determine of what kind their religion 
is, whether true or false.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.iv.iv-p54">Many have asserted, as has been observed above, that it is impossible 
to love God unless we first believe that he designs to save us; and that such belief 
is the necessary foundation of all friendly affection to him. If their hearts agree 
with their theory, and all their love to God originates from a persuasion that he 
loves them, it is certain, that all their supposed piety is mere delusion; and that 
they are not friends, but enemies to the true God; which has been shown above.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.iv.iv-p55">There have been, and now are many, who, when they have given a 
relation of their conversion, have represented that they were first brought to love 
God, from a persuasion that he first loved them, and designed to save them, that 
Christ died for them, &amp;c. And that all their after religious exercises and love 
are founded on this persuasion, and sink or rise, as that is stronger or weaker. 
If this account which they give of themselves, of their conversion and religious 
exercises, be in fact true, all their religion, from beginning to end, falls short 
of real Christianity; and is of a contrary nature. It was impossible they could 
have such a persuasion on good ground antecedent to their loving God; therefore 
they believed without any evidence, and all their religion was founded on delusion 
and falsehood. But if it were miraculously revealed to them, that God designed <pb n="485" id="iv.iv.iv-Page_485" />
to save them, and all their love to him originated from such a revelation, and they 
could not love him, on any other supposition, all their religious exercise has its 
foundation in selfishness, and is nothing but self love, and consistent with enmity 
against God.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.iv.iv-p56">Others give a different account of their first conversion and 
after religious exercise, which may consist in disinterested affection, and has 
that appearance; yet ought to be carefully considered and examined, lest some fatal 
deception should lurk at bottom. They may reasonably inquire, whether old things 
are passed away, and all things are become new, in this respect; that whereas they 
were naturally wholly selfish in their views, exercises and desires, they now have 
disinterested affection, and new views and desires, which appear to be of this kind. 
Whether they have that benevolent regard to God and the Redeemer, as to lead them 
to desire, above all things, that he may be glorified, and his will be done, whatever 
it may be; that his interest and kingdom may be promoted, and come to perfection, 
so as to comprise the greatest possible happiness and glory of the universe: And 
whether they thus “seek first the kingdom of God,” and devote all they have, and 
themselves, to his glory, and the greatest good of the whole; having no other interest 
but this, and what is comprehended in it; not desiring their own happiness, or that 
of any other individual, unless it be consistent with the glory of God, and the 
greatest general good: And whether they are sincerely desiring and seeking the good 
of all men now living, and wishing every one to be happy, so far as may be consistent 
with the w ill of God, and the greatest general good; and actually endeavouring 
to do good to all men, as they have opportunity; and careful not to injure their 
character, persons or interest, in any respect, by word or action; at the same time, 
being liberal and bountiful to the poor and distressed to the utmost of their ability; 
and expressing their benevolence to all, by praying for them: And whether they love 
their enemies with benevolent affection, whatever injuries they may have done them: 
and are disposed to do good to them; and do wish them well, and pray for them: Whether 
those who <pb n="486" id="iv.iv.iv-Page_486" />appear to them to be the benevolent friends of God and man, 
are peculiarly dear to them, to whom their hearts are united in strong benevolent 
affection, and complacential love. If they find their religious affection is of 
this nature, and implies all this, and their words and actions are in some good 
measure answerable, they may reasonably conclude that they are born of the Spirit 
of God, and that their religion consists in disinterested affection.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.iv.iv-p57">It must be added, that this disinterested benevolence will farther 
evidence itself in religious, holy joy in God, his works and revealed designs, in 
which there is no selfishness, but the contrary. It will rejoice in the infinite, 
independent, unchangeable, and eternal felicity of the triune God, Father, Son and 
Holy Ghost; and that he is able, and will glorify himself to the highest possible 
degree forever. It rejoices in the hope and assurance of the glory of God, and that 
nothing has, or shall take place, which shall not turn to his glory: That the wrath 
of man shall praise him, and the remainder of wrath he will restrain. It will also 
rejoice, that the greatest good, and highest happiness of the creation, will be 
promoted, and take place. That all the evil that does, or shall exist, cannot prevent 
this; but is all ordered, and will be overruled by infinite wisdom and goodness, 
to answer this end; so as to issue in the greatest good of the whole. Thus the felicity 
and glory of God, and the greatest good and happiness of the creation, as one united 
whole, is the great object of the desire, hope and joy of the truly benevolent. 
They rejoice in the divine character and perfection; in the independent supremacy, 
and infinitely wise and good government of God, under which nothing can take place, 
but what is, all things considered, wisest and best, and necessary in the best manner 
to promote the greatest good of the whole. They acquiesce and rejoice in his infinitely 
wise and holy will, that it is done in heaven, and on earth, and will be done forever; 
And that his counsel and designs, which have fixed all events, from the greatest 
to the least, are established forever, and cannot be obstructed, or altered.</p>
<pb n="487" id="iv.iv.iv-Page_487" />
<p class="normal" id="iv.iv.iv-p58">In all this the benevolent christian does rejoice, independent 
of his own personal interest; and whatever may be the will of God concerning that, 
and whatever may become of him, and other individuals, whether his or their particular 
personal interest and happiness be consistent with the glory of God and the general 
good, and included in these, or not. Yet he who exercises this disinterested affection, 
views his own personal interest as great and important; yea, he feels it to be much 
greater and more important, than when he was wholly selfish; and has a proper regard 
for it. But as the public interest now appears to him to be infinitely greater, 
and of more worth, than the happiness of any individual, he is disposed to give 
up and renounce all the latter, so far as it is inconsistent with the public interest, 
and as is necessary to promote the greatest common good. And that self love which 
is contrary to this, is enmity to the greatest good of the public, and to the good 
of society; and therefore enmity against God.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.iv.iv-p59">The true christian, who, so far as he is such, exercises this 
disinterested affection, may consider all this, and examine himself by it; and yet 
be left in doubt, whether he has any degree of such affection, or not; and sometimes 
may even conclude against himself, that he is an utter stranger to it. This may, 
in some instances, be owing to not attending to, and understanding the distinction 
and difference between a proper and great regard to their own interest, which is 
included in disinterested affection, as it has been stated above, and that self 
love, which seeks a selfish interest only: And they are ready to look upon all regard 
to their personal interest and desire of happiness to be self love; and hence are 
led to doubt whether they have any other affection; and sometimes to conclude they 
are wholly selfish. This also may arise from a view and sense of the great degree 
and strength of self love, which yet continues with them. He who has any degree 
of disinterested affection has a proportionable greater discerning of the nature 
and exercise of selfishness, which is in his own heart. His disinterested love may 
be said to be the eye which discerns his self love, in all its secret workings, 
and the real odiousness of it. His attention is therefore <pb n="488" id="iv.iv.iv-Page_488" />turned to 
this; he looks upon it so much, and watches it so constantly, and sees so much of 
it, that sometimes he sees nothing else, and is ready to conclude he is wholly selfish 
in all he does; and is a stranger to disinterested affection. It is hoped that what 
has been said on this subject, in this section, will be some help to all honest 
inquirers, who have some degree of disinterested affection, to discern their own 
character, and to make proper distinction between the love of a true christian and 
self love; and thus obtain evidence that they are born of the Spirit of God. And 
that those who have never been renewed to holiness, but are wholly selfish in all 
their exercises, will, by attending to these things, if they will attend, be convinced 
that they are far from having any true religion.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.iv.iv-p60">These latter are in great danger of continuing in their deception, 
and holding fast their delusion. They find religion so frequently, and so much represented 
as a selfish thing, both in public preaching, in books, and in conversation; and 
disinterested affection so much spoken against, as a mere chimera, and impossible; 
and so much said in favour of self love; that they may be disposed to treat what 
is the subject of this section, as erroneous and whimsical, and not worthy of their 
attention.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.iv.iv-p61">And if they be convinced that true religion does consist in disinterested 
affection, as described above, they are in danger of considering the exercises of 
their self love, as being disinterested benevolence; since, by the supposition, 
they know not what the latter is, experimentally; and their self love, in so many 
ways, puts on the garb of disinterested benevolence, and makes a plausible appearance: 
And they are so partial in favour of themselves, and their own affections, that 
they are easily deceived into a favourable opinion of them. Even from self love 
and pride, they may exert themselves for the public good, either because they consider 
their own interest as connected with that of the public, and dependent upon it; 
or because this is the way to escape infamy, and get the applause of their fellow 
men. And they may be kind and generous to others, either because others love them, 
or from a selfish desire to have the <pb n="489" id="iv.iv.iv-Page_489" />name of generous, charitable 
persons. And they think they do these things from a disinterested regard to the 
public, and to others, because it has such an appearance. Besides, the most selfish 
person has some affections which are not self love, nor disinterested benevolence, 
but have some resemblance to the latter. What is called natural affection, the affection 
of parents to children, and of children to parents, &amp;c. is not, of itself, and in 
the nature of it, moral affection; but what is called mere instinct. This is called 
love, by which parents and children are inclined to desire the welfare of each other, 
and looks like disinterested benevolence: But is really nothing but instinct, which 
falls below moral agency; accompanied and strengthened by self love, in selfish 
persons; and therefore is no evidence that they who have this in the highest degree, 
have the least degree of disinterested affection under consideration, or universal 
benevolence, which is essential to holy love.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.iv.iv-p62">And what is called natural pity or compassion, is not self love, 
nor is it universal benevolence, but an instinct, which God, for wise reasons, and 
for the good of mankind, has implanted in all men. This being a sort of benevolence, 
is by many mistaken for disinterested holy love, and so are deceiving themselves 
and others. Would men know their own moral character, they must distinguish these 
from universal benevolence, and that disinterested affection, in which all true 
religion consists.<note n="523" id="iv.iv.iv-p62.1"><p class="normal" id="iv.iv.iv-p63">See Edwards on the Nature of true Virtue, Chap. vi.</p></note></p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.iv.iv-p64">V. This subject teaches us the excellency of real Christianity; 
and that it is suited to promote the happiness of individuals who partake of the 
true spirit of it, and of society, where it prevails.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.iv.iv-p65">Self love tends to natural evil, and always produces it, unless 
it be restrained and counteracted. It contracts the mind of him who is under the 
power of this selfish affection. It sinks it down to a sordid littleness and lowness 
of spirit, and prevents his proper enjoyment of the good and happiness of others; 
and subjects him to innumerable, painful feelings and miseries, which are the necessary 
attendants of pride, envy, covetousness, &amp;c. And this same self love is the source 
of all the evils that <pb n="490" id="iv.iv.iv-Page_490" />take place in society. All instances of unrighteousness, 
oppression and cruelty, of contention and war, and of every injury done by one to 
another, or to the public; and all deceit, falsehood and hypocrisy, incontinency, 
and every unruly lust; and every thing which worketh evil to others, and to society, 
are the fruit of self love. Take this away, and all these will cease. And this is 
removed as far as the spirit of true Christianity is imbibed.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.iv.iv-p66">But universal benevolence, christian love, spreads happiness, 
wherever it flourishes. It enlarges and ennobles the mind, and puts the benevolent 
person in possession of the good and happiness of others, so that he enjoys it all 
in a great degree, and rejoices with those who rejoice. By this he becomes a cordial 
and judicious friend to every one, and more especially to those with whom he has 
the most connection; and is disposed to do good to all, as he has ability and opportunity: 
And is devoted to the good of the public, and of the society to which he belongs, 
being ready to give up his private, personal interest, in any part or the whole 
of it, when the public interest demands it, and this is necessary for the good of 
the whole. This disinterested benevolence will lead every one to take his proper 
place, and to be industrious, active, prudent and faithful in his own business, 
and honest, upright, sincere and true in all his concerns and dealings with his 
fellow men. This love is kind, it is mercy, humility, condescension, meekness, peaceableness, 
temperance, long suffering, and brotherly kindness. This will form rules by which 
they may fill their station with honour and usefulness; to use their influence for 
the public good, and the happiness of every individual, so far as is consistent 
with the greatest public happiness. And this will induce those in more private stations, 
to acquiesce in, and support good government; to live in peace with all men, if 
possible. And this will unite all the particular members of the society to each 
other, and form them into a band of brothers, all engaged to promote the general 
good, and the best interest of each other, so far as it may be consistent with, 
and subserve the greatest good of the whole.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.iv.iv-p67">Whenever Christianity shall spread over the whole world, and the 
distinguishing spirit and power of it take <pb n="491" id="iv.iv.iv-Page_491" />place universally, forming 
men to a high degree of universal benevolence, and disinterested affection, it will 
unite mankind into one happy society, teaching them to love each other as brethren, 
each one seeking and rejoicing in the public good, and in the happiness of individuals: 
This will form the most happy state of public society that can be enjoyed on earth. 
And when we take into view their love to the Redeemer, their devotedness to his 
honour and service, and obedience to his laws, in the practice of piety, devotion 
and mercy; their joy in his character, exaltation and honour; their gratitude to 
him for their redemption from infinite evil, and making them heirs of unspeakable 
felicity; their unshaken trust in him for the fulfilment of all his promises; and 
their clear and sure prospects of their eternal happiness, and the endless and increasing 
glory of his kingdom:—This will be the greatest likeness of heaven of any thing 
that has taken place on earth, or ever will. And they will hereby be made meet for 
the eternal inheritance of the saints in light.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.iv.iv-p68">This leads to a view of the most perfect, happy, and glorious 
society in heaven, in the eternal kingdom of God. All the beauty, happiness, and 
glory of it, will consist in this disinterested love, made perfect, reigning, and 
having its proper and full effect, without impediment, both in God, and in every 
member of this kingdom.</p>

</div3>

<div3 title="Section V. Concerning Divine Illumination." prev="iv.iv.iv" next="v" id="iv.iv.v">

<h2 id="iv.iv.v-p0.1">Section V.</h2>
<p class="center" id="iv.iv.v-p1"><i>Concerning Divine Illumination</i>.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.iv.v-p2">THE divine oracles represent all the wicked, by which are meant 
all men who are not righteous, to be in a state of darkness; from which they only 
are recovered, who are born of God, and become real christians. “The way of the 
wicked is as darkness: They know not at what they stumble.”<note n="524" id="iv.iv.v-p2.1"><p class="normal" id="iv.iv.v-p3"><scripRef id="iv.iv.v-p3.1" passage="Prov. iv. 19" parsed="|Prov|4|19|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Prov.4.19">Prov. iv. 19</scripRef>.</p></note> 
“The natural man receiveth not the things of the Spirit of God; for they are foolishness 
unto him: neither can he know them, because they are spiritually discerned.”<note n="525" id="iv.iv.v-p3.2"><p class="normal" id="iv.iv.v-p4">
<scripRef id="iv.iv.v-p4.1" passage="1 Cor. ii. 14" parsed="|1Cor|2|14|0|0" osisRef="Bible:1Cor.2.14">1 Cor. ii. 14</scripRef>.</p></note> “Ye were once <i>darkness</i>, but now are ye light in the 
Lord.”<note n="526" id="iv.iv.v-p4.2"><p class="normal" id="iv.iv.v-p5"><scripRef id="iv.iv.v-p5.1" passage="Eph. v. 8" parsed="|Eph|5|8|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Eph.5.8">Eph. v. 8</scripRef>.</p></note> All <pb n="492" id="iv.iv.v-Page_492" />unbelievers, ungodly and disobedient, 
are said in scripture to be blind, and not to know God, in places too many to mention 
here. St. Paul says, “If our gospel be hid, it is <i>hid</i> to them that are lost; 
in whom the god of this world hath <i>blinded</i> the minds of them which <i>believe 
not</i>, lest the light of the glorious gospel of Christ, who is the image of God, 
should shine unto them.”<note n="527" id="iv.iv.v-p5.2"><p class="normal" id="iv.iv.v-p6"><scripRef id="iv.iv.v-p6.1" passage="2 Cor. iv. 3" parsed="|2Cor|4|3|0|0" osisRef="Bible:2Cor.4.3">2 Cor. iv. 3</scripRef>, <scripRef passage="2 Cor. 4:4" id="iv.iv.v-p6.2" parsed="|2Cor|4|4|0|0" osisRef="Bible:2Cor.4.4">4</scripRef>.</p></note> “The Lord Jesus shall be 
revealed from heaven, in flaming lire, taking vengeance on them that know not God, 
and that <i>obey not the gospel</i>.”<note n="528" id="iv.iv.v-p6.3"><p class="normal" id="iv.iv.v-p7"><scripRef id="iv.iv.v-p7.1" passage="2 Thess. i. 7" parsed="|2Thess|1|7|0|0" osisRef="Bible:2Thess.1.7">2 Thess. i. 7</scripRef>, <scripRef passage="2 Thess. 1:8" id="iv.iv.v-p7.2" parsed="|2Thess|1|8|0|0" osisRef="Bible:2Thess.1.8">8</scripRef>.</p></note> Agreeable to 
this, men are said by conversion, by which they become true christians, to have 
their eyes opened, and to be turned from darkness to light. To be called out of 
darkness into marvellous light. To be delivered from the power of darkness, and 
translated into the kingdom of God’s dear Son.<note n="529" id="iv.iv.v-p7.3"><p class="normal" id="iv.iv.v-p8"><scripRef id="iv.iv.v-p8.1" passage="Acts xxvi. 18" parsed="|Acts|26|18|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Acts.26.18">Acts xxvi. 18</scripRef>. <scripRef passage="Col 1:13" id="iv.iv.v-p8.2" parsed="|Col|1|13|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Col.1.13">
Col. i. 13</scripRef>. 
<scripRef passage="1Pet 2:9" id="iv.iv.v-p8.3" parsed="|1Pet|2|9|0|0" osisRef="Bible:1Pet.2.9">1 Peter ii. 9</scripRef></p></note> And conversion from 
sin to God is described by being <i>enlightened</i>.<note n="530" id="iv.iv.v-p8.4"><p class="normal" id="iv.iv.v-p9"><scripRef id="iv.iv.v-p9.1" passage="Heb. x. 32" parsed="|Heb|10|32|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Heb.10.32">Heb. x. 32</scripRef>.</p></note></p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.iv.v-p10">This ignorance and darkness, and the contrary light or knowledge, 
are, according to scripture, of a moral nature, and consequently consist not in 
intellectual ignorance, and knowledge, as distinct from any thing which belongs 
to the heart, and not implying any sensations and exercises of the latter: For that 
darkness or light which belongs to the intellect, or speculative understanding, 
as distinct from the heart, and in which the heart has no influence or concern, 
has nothing moral in it, and is neither virtuous nor vicious, sin or holiness. Therefore 
the scripture constantly speaks of this darkness and light, this ignorance or want 
of understanding, and the contrary understanding and knowledge, as having their 
seat in the heart, and belonging to that, and predicated of it, and as being, as 
that is, whether right or wrong, wholly corrupt or renewed. The following passages 
are sufficient to prove this. “Yet the Lord hath not given you <i>an heart to perceive</i>, 
and eyes to see, and ears to hear unto this day.”<note n="531" id="iv.iv.v-p10.1"><p class="normal" id="iv.iv.v-p11"><scripRef id="iv.iv.v-p11.1" passage="Deut. xxix. 4" parsed="|Deut|29|4|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Deut.29.4">Deut. xxix. 4</scripRef>.</p></note> When 
the great ignorance and delusion, and stupidity of idolators, in worshipping an 
image, which they have formed out of a tree, is described, it is, in the conclusion, 
all ascribed to their hearts. “They have not known, nor understood; <pb n="493" id="iv.iv.v-Page_493" />
for he hath shut their eyes, that they cannot see; and <i>their hearts</i>, that 
they cannot understand. And none considereth <i>in his heart</i>, neither is there 
knowledge nor understanding, to say, I have burnt part of it in the fire, &amp;:c. He 
feedeth on ashes. <i>A deceived heart hath turned him aside</i>, that he cannot 
deliver his soul, nor say, Is there not a He in my right hand?”<note n="532" id="iv.iv.v-p11.2"><p class="normal" id="iv.iv.v-p12"><scripRef passage="Isa 44:9-18, 19, 20" id="iv.iv.v-p12.1" parsed="|Isa|44|9|44|18;|Isa|44|19|0|0;|Isa|44|20|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Isa.44.9-Isa.44.18 Bible:Isa.44.19 Bible:Isa.44.20">
Isai. xliv. 9-18, 19, 20</scripRef>.</p></note></p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.iv.v-p13">St. Paul asserts the same of the Gentiles in general. They became 
vain in their imaginations, and <i>their foolish heart was darkened</i>. Having 
the understanding darkened, being alienated from the life of God, through the ignorance 
that is in them, <i>because of the blindness of their heart</i>.”<note n="533" id="iv.iv.v-p13.1"><p class="normal" id="iv.iv.v-p14">Rom. i 21. <scripRef passage="Eph 4:18" id="iv.iv.v-p14.1" parsed="|Eph|4|18|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Eph.4.18">
Eph. iv. 18</scripRef>.</p></note> And he asserts the same of the Jews. That their blindness, 
respecting Christ and the gospel, was wholly in their hearts, or owing to the vail 
drawn over them by their opposition to God, and turning away from him: And that 
this blindness could not be removed, unless their hearts were renewed, and turned 
to the Lord. “Their minds were blinded.—Even unto this day, when Moses is 
read, <i>the vail is upon their heart</i>. Nevertheless when it shall turn to the 
Lord, the vail shall be taken away.”<note n="534" id="iv.iv.v-p14.2"><p class="normal" id="iv.iv.v-p15"><scripRef id="iv.iv.v-p15.1" passage="2 Cor. iii." parsed="|2Cor|3|0|0|0" osisRef="Bible:2Cor.3">2 Cor. iii.</scripRef> l4, 15, 16.</p></note> The evangelist 
John says the same of the Jews, which Isaiah had long before said of them. “He hath 
blinded their eyes, <i>and hardened their hearts</i>; that they should not see with 
their eyes, <i>nor understand with their heart</i>, and be converted, and I should 
heal them.”<note n="535" id="iv.iv.v-p15.2"><p class="normal" id="iv.iv.v-p16"><scripRef id="iv.iv.v-p16.1" passage="John xii. 40" parsed="|John|12|40|0|0" osisRef="Bible:John.12.40">John xii. 40</scripRef>.</p></note> So all their ignorance and errors are ascribed 
to their evil hearts in the following words, taken from the <scripRef passage="Psa 95:10" id="iv.iv.v-p16.2" parsed="|Ps|95|10|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Ps.95.10">
95th Psalm</scripRef>. “Wherefore I was grieved with that generation, and said.
<i>They do always err in their heart</i>; and they have not known my ways.”<note n="536" id="iv.iv.v-p16.3"><p class="normal" id="iv.iv.v-p17">
<scripRef id="iv.iv.v-p17.1" passage="Heb iii. 10" parsed="|Heb|3|10|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Heb.3.10">Heb iii. 10</scripRef>.</p></note> “He that saith he is in the light, and hateth his brother, is 
in darkness, even until now. He that hateth his brother, is in darkness, and walketh 
in darkness, and knoweth not whither he goeth, because that darkness hath blinded 
his eyes.”<note n="537" id="iv.iv.v-p17.2"><p class="normal" id="iv.iv.v-p18"><scripRef id="iv.iv.v-p18.1" passage="1 John ii. 9" parsed="|1John|2|9|0|0" osisRef="Bible:1John.2.9">1 John ii. 9</scripRef>, <scripRef passage="1 John 2:11" id="iv.iv.v-p18.2" parsed="|1John|2|11|0|0" osisRef="Bible:1John.2.11">11</scripRef>.</p></note> This darkness is here said to consist 
in the heart, in the evil disposition of that, in not loving but hating his brother, 
which is an exercise of the heart, and belongs to that only.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.iv.v-p19">It hence appears why this darkness is always spoken of in divine 
revelation as criminal. It is sinful in every <pb n="494" id="iv.iv.v-Page_494" />degree of it, as it 
consists in the moral depravity of the heart. This blindness of mind is not only 
connected with sinful depravity, but consists in the sinful exercises and lusts 
of the mind, and cannot be distinguished from sin in the heart. Sin is in every 
degree and in every exercise of it, delusion and blindness itself: And when the 
heart is totally corrupt or sinful, which is true of every unrenewed heart, as has 
been proved, this blindness, this moral darkness, is total, and wholly excludes 
every degree of the opposite, which is called light, understanding, knowledge and 
wisdom, in the scriptures. It is, according to scripture, a <i>wilful blindness</i>, 
being wholly owing to the opposition of the heart to the light of moral truth, or 
rather, consisting altogether in this. It is represented by closing the eyes to 
keep light out, however clearly it may shine, and can be kept out by nothing but 
by not making a right use of the eyes, by refusing to open them. Men are naturally 
totally blind to the things of the moral world, except it be only in mere speculation, 
because they are totally corrupt, and wholly abuse and pervert the natural powers 
and faculties of their mind, and their capacity of moral exercises and true discernment, 
by loving darkness and hating the light. Consequently, this blindness is nothing 
but sin, and consists wholly in the criminal, inexcusable exercise of the will or 
heart. Hence this darkness is condemned and forbidden by God in his word; and they 
who are in this sense blind, are commanded to open their mental eye, to renounce 
the darkness and delusions in which they are, and receive the knowledge of the truth, 
in the love of it. “Hear, ye deaf, and look, ye blind, that ye may see.”<note n="538" id="iv.iv.v-p19.1"><p class="normal" id="iv.iv.v-p20"><scripRef id="iv.iv.v-p20.1" passage="Isaiah xlii. 18" parsed="|Isa|42|18|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Isa.42.18">Isaiah 
xlii. 18</scripRef>.</p></note> “Awake, thou that sleepest, and arise from the dead, and Christ 
shall give thee light.”<note n="539" id="iv.iv.v-p20.2"><p class="normal" id="iv.iv.v-p21"><scripRef id="iv.iv.v-p21.1" passage="Eph. v. 14" parsed="|Eph|5|14|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Eph.5.14">Eph. v. 14</scripRef>.</p></note> And hence Christ, when he was on 
earth, and since his ascension to heaven, did so often say, “He that hath cars to 
hear, let him hear. He that hath an ear, let him hear.”</p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.iv.v-p22">And that the above representation of this matter is agreeable 
to truth and to scripture, is confirmed beyond all dispute, by the most plain and 
express statement of it, by our Saviour himself. His words are, “He that 

<pb n="495" id="iv.iv.v-Page_495" />believeth not, is condemned already, because he hath not believed 
in the name of the only begotten Son of God. And this is the condemnation, that 
light is come into the world, and men loved darkness rather than light, because 
their deeds were evil. For every one that doth evil, hateth the light, neither cometh 
to the light.”<note n="540" id="iv.iv.v-p22.1"><p class="normal" id="iv.iv.v-p23"><scripRef id="iv.iv.v-p23.1" passage="John iii. 18" parsed="|John|3|18|0|0" osisRef="Bible:John.3.18">John iii. 18</scripRef>, <scripRef passage="John 3:19" id="iv.iv.v-p23.2" parsed="|John|3|19|0|0" osisRef="Bible:John.3.19">19</scripRef>, <scripRef passage="John 3:20" id="iv.iv.v-p23.3" parsed="|John|3|20|0|0" osisRef="Bible:John.3.20">20</scripRef>.</p></note> 
Believing on Christ implies a discerning the truth respecting the character of the 
Redeemer, and redemption by him, and approving and loving it: and in this does faith 
consist. Unbelief is directly the opposite; it is blindness and darkness itself. 
St. Paul says, “If our gospel be hid, it is hid to them that are lost: In whom the 
god of this world <i>hath blinded the minds of them which believe not</i>.” It consists 
in opposition to the most desirable, charming, glorious light and truth, and in 
hating it, and loving the opposite darkness. Therefore this is a voluntary, chosen 
darkness. It is altogether criminal, and is that for which they are justly condemned.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.iv.v-p24">It hence follows, that the light and understanding which is opposed 
to this moral darkness does also belong to the heart, and implies a virtuous character, 
and does consist in true holiness, or moral excellence. And in this light it is 
represented in the sacred writings. What Solomon asks, and God promises to give 
him, is called <i>wisdom</i> and <i>knowledge</i>, in one place,<note n="541" id="iv.iv.v-p24.1"><p class="normal" id="iv.iv.v-p25"><scripRef id="iv.iv.v-p25.1" passage="2 Chron. i. 10" parsed="|2Chr|1|10|0|0" osisRef="Bible:2Chr.1.10">2 Chron. 
i. 10</scripRef>, <scripRef passage="2 Chron. 1:11" id="iv.iv.v-p25.2" parsed="|2Chr|1|11|0|0" osisRef="Bible:2Chr.1.11">11</scripRef>.</p></note> and in another place, is called <i>a wise and understanding heart</i>.<note n="542" id="iv.iv.v-p25.3"><p class="normal" id="iv.iv.v-p26">
<scripRef id="iv.iv.v-p26.1" passage="1 Kings iii. 9" parsed="|1Kgs|3|9|0|0" osisRef="Bible:1Kgs.3.9">1 Kings iii. 9</scripRef>, <scripRef passage="1 Kings 3:12" id="iv.iv.v-p26.2" parsed="|1Kgs|3|12|0|0" osisRef="Bible:1Kgs.3.12">12</scripRef>.</p></note> 
Indeed, true wisdom has its seat in the heart or will, and consists essentially 
in the right moral disposition of the mind, as has been shewn: And it is abundantly 
evident, that the word is generally used in this sense in the scripture. And this 
in scripture is the same with true light, or discerning, understanding and knowledge. 
The virtuous, holy heart, is an enlightened, wise and understanding heart. And the 
totally depraved, vicious heart, is darkness itself, blind, foolish, and without 
understanding. That true light and knowledge, the knowledge of God, does not consist 
in mere speculation, but depends upon the heart, and consists in the moral disposition 
and exercises of that, is evident from the following words of God by Jeremiah: “I 
will give <pb n="496" id="iv.iv.v-Page_496" />them <i>an heart to know me</i>.”<note n="543" id="iv.iv.v-p26.3"><p class="normal" id="iv.iv.v-p27"><scripRef id="iv.iv.v-p27.1" passage="Jer. xxiv. 7" parsed="|Jer|24|7|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Jer.24.7">Jer. xxiv. 7</scripRef>.</p></note> 
Therefore our Saviour placed all holiness of heart, and all true happiness, in the 
knowledge of the only true God, and the Redeemer, as the whole is comprehended in 
this. “This is life eternal, that they might know thee the only true God, 
and Jesus Christ whom thou has sent.”<note n="544" id="iv.iv.v-p27.2"><p class="normal" id="iv.iv.v-p28"><scripRef id="iv.iv.v-p28.1" passage="John xvii. 3" parsed="|John|17|3|0|0" osisRef="Bible:John.17.3">John xvii. 3</scripRef>.</p></note> Agreeable to this 
the Psalmist says, “Give me understanding and I shall keep thy law: Yea, I shall 
observe it with my whole heart. Give me understanding, and I shall live.”<note n="545" id="iv.iv.v-p28.2"><p class="normal" id="iv.iv.v-p29">
<scripRef id="iv.iv.v-p29.1" passage="Psalm cxix. 34" parsed="|Ps|119|34|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Ps.119.34">Psalm cxix. 34</scripRef>, <scripRef passage="Psalm 119:144" id="iv.iv.v-p29.2" parsed="|Ps|119|144|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Ps.119.144">144</scripRef>.</p></note> That the illumination which takes place in the mind, 
in regeneration and conversion, respects the heart, and has its seat in that, is 
asserted by St. Paul in the following words: “God, who commanded the light to shine 
out of darkness, hath <i>shined in our hearts</i>, to give the light of the knowledge 
of the glory of God, in the face of Jesus Christ.”<note n="546" id="iv.iv.v-p29.3"><p class="normal" id="iv.iv.v-p30"><scripRef id="iv.iv.v-p30.1" passage="2 Cor. iv. 6" parsed="|2Cor|4|6|0|0" osisRef="Bible:2Cor.4.6">2 Cor. iv. 6</scripRef>.</p></note> And 
that true light and knowledge implies renovation of heart, or true holiness, and 
is really the same thing, is evident from St. Paul’s mentioning these as synonymous. 
In his epistle to the Colossians, he describes the new man, or renewed hearty in 
the following words: “And have put on the new man, which is <i>renewed in knowledge</i>, 
after the image of him that created him.”<note n="547" id="iv.iv.v-p30.2"><p class="normal" id="iv.iv.v-p31"><scripRef id="iv.iv.v-p31.1" passage="Col. iii. 10" parsed="|Col|3|10|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Col.3.10">Col. iii. 10</scripRef>.</p></note> And in his 
epistle to the Ephesians, in describing the same new man, he uses these words; “And 
be renewed in the spirit of your mind; and put on the new man, which after God is 
created <i>in righteousness and true holiness</i>. ”<note n="548" id="iv.iv.v-p31.2"><p class="normal" id="iv.iv.v-p32"><scripRef id="iv.iv.v-p32.1" passage="Eph. iv. 23" parsed="|Eph|4|23|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Eph.4.23">Eph. iv. 23</scripRef>, <scripRef passage="Eph 4:24" id="iv.iv.v-p32.2" parsed="|Eph|4|24|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Eph.4.24">24</scripRef>.</p></note> 
From these two passages, compared together, it may be inferred with certainty, that
<i>knowledge</i> comprehends <i>righteousness</i> and <i>true holiness</i>, and 
is the same thing.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.iv.v-p33">That true light and knowledge, the knowledge of God, which is 
peculiar to them who are renewed and born of the Spirit of God, is seated in the 
heart, and implies voluntary exercise, even that love, in which all holiness consists, 
according to scripture, may be proved from the following passage: “Beloved, let 
us love one another: For love is of God: and every one that loveth is horn of God, 
and knoweth God, He that loveth not, knoweth not God; for God is love.”<note n="549" id="iv.iv.v-p33.1"><p class="normal" id="iv.iv.v-p34"><scripRef id="iv.iv.v-p34.1" passage="1 John iv. 7" parsed="|1John|4|7|0|0" osisRef="Bible:1John.4.7">1 
John iv. 7</scripRef>, <scripRef passage="1 John 4:8" id="iv.iv.v-p34.2" parsed="|1John|4|8|0|0" osisRef="Bible:1John.4.8">8</scripRef>.</p></note> In these words, love and knowing God, are asserted to be so <pb n="497" id="iv.iv.v-Page_497" />
connected, that where love is, there is the knowledge of God; and they who have 
no love, do not know God. Hence it may be inferred, that the knowledge of God is 
dependent on love; for he who does not love, does not know him: There must therefore 
be this love, in order to know God, as the latter cannot exist without the former; 
and does exist wherever the former exists. And it is farther inferred, that love, 
and the knowledge of God, cannot be distinguished, as the one implies the other, 
and are the same exercise of the heart. Loving God is knowing him, and knowing God 
is loving him. Love is the eye of the mind, by which the objects in the moral world 
are seen in a true light; and where this eye, this discerning, is not, the mind 
is in total darkness with respect to moral objects. The reason of this is here given, 
“For God is love.” As love comprehends all moral excellence, and in this the moral 
character of God consists; therefore he who loveth not, cannot have any true idea 
or conception of love; he cannot know the divine moral character, which is love. 
Love is here to be understood in its general nature, “Every one that <i>loveth</i>. 
He that <i>loveth</i> not.” That is, he whose heart is not formed to the exercise 
of universal, disinterested benevolence. This, as has been shown, comprehends all 
virtuous, holy love; and is the same affection, whether it be exercised towards 
God or our neighbour. All the difference is owing to the difference of the objects 
of this same love.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.iv.v-p35">In this view it appears that the same thing is asserted by this 
apostle in the preceding part of this epistle. He says, “he that hateth his brother 
is in darkness, and walketh in darkness, even until now. But lie that loveth his 
brother, abideth in the light.”<note n="550" id="iv.iv.v-p35.1"><p class="normal" id="iv.iv.v-p36"><scripRef id="iv.iv.v-p36.1" passage="1 John ii. 9" parsed="|1John|2|9|0|0" osisRef="Bible:1John.2.9">1 John ii. 9</scripRef>, <scripRef passage="1 John 2:10" id="iv.iv.v-p36.2" parsed="|1John|2|10|0|0" osisRef="Bible:1John.2.10">10</scripRef>, <scripRef passage="1 John 2:11" id="iv.iv.v-p36.3" parsed="|1John|2|11|0|0" osisRef="Bible:1John.2.11">11</scripRef>.</p></note> He that loveth 
is born of God, and is divinely illuminated, and knoweth God, and the objects of 
the moral world, and walketh in the light. He that loveth not is in total darkness 
with respect to these objects: he hath not seen God, nor known him; for the pure 
in heart only, that is, they who love, see God.<note n="551" id="iv.iv.v-p36.4"><p class="normal" id="iv.iv.v-p37"><scripRef id="iv.iv.v-p37.1" passage="Matt. v. 8" parsed="|Matt|5|8|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Matt.5.8">Matt. v. 8</scripRef>.</p></note> Love is 
the only light of the moral world. Could this be extinguished, all <pb n="498" id="iv.iv.v-Page_498" />
would be total darkness. And they who are fallen into the darkness of sin, or self 
love, in which all sin radically consists, as has been shown, can be recovered to 
light, by that renovation only, that purity of heart which consists in love, or 
disinterested affection. Hence it appears that when this apostle says, “God is light, 
”<note n="552" id="iv.iv.v-p37.2"><p class="normal" id="iv.iv.v-p38"><scripRef id="iv.iv.v-p38.1" passage="1 John i. 5" parsed="|1John|1|5|0|0" osisRef="Bible:1John.1.5">1 John i. 5</scripRef>.</p></note> and “God is love,”<note n="553" id="iv.iv.v-p38.2"><p class="normal" id="iv.iv.v-p39"><scripRef passage="1John 4:8" id="iv.iv.v-p39.1" parsed="|1John|4|8|0|0" osisRef="Bible:1John.4.8">
Chap. iv. 8</scripRef>.</p></note> he does not mean any thing really different by light 
and love; for they cannot be distinguished; but are the same thing. Light is love, 
and love is light.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.iv.v-p40">This same sentiment, which is inculcated by the apostle John in 
the passages just considered, is also asserted by St. Paul, in the following words. “Knowledge puffeth up, but love edifieth. If any man think that he knoweth any thing, 
he knoweth nothing yet as he ought to know.” That is, if any man who does not love, 
think he has true knowledge by mere speculation, and that all light and knowledge 
consists in this, and desires and seeks no other, he does yet know nothing respecting 
moral, spiritual objects, as he ought to know, and must know, in order to have the 
true knowledge of God. “But if any man love God, he (that is, God) is known by him.”<note n="554" id="iv.iv.v-p40.1"><p class="normal" id="iv.iv.v-p41">
<scripRef id="iv.iv.v-p41.1" passage="1 Cor. viii. 1" parsed="|1Cor|8|1|0|0" osisRef="Bible:1Cor.8.1">1 Cor. viii. 1</scripRef>, <scripRef passage="1 Cor. 8:2" id="iv.iv.v-p41.2" parsed="|1Cor|8|2|0|0" osisRef="Bible:1Cor.8.2">2</scripRef>, <scripRef passage="1 Cor. 8:3" id="iv.iv.v-p41.3" parsed="|1Cor|8|3|0|0" osisRef="Bible:1Cor.8.3">3</scripRef>.</p></note> That is, if any man have love, he is illuminated, and 
has true light and knowledge, which does not consist in mere speculation, but in 
the sensations and taste of the heart, by which he discerns the divine character 
with approbation, and knows the only true God; which is the knowledge that all men
<i>ought</i> to have, as they are commanded to love, and all their duty lies in 
this. All mere speculative knowledge that is possible to be attained without love, 
leaves men in total moral darkness, in the exercise of selfishness and pride, in 
opposition to every part and degree of their duty.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.iv.v-p42">Agreeable to this, the same apostle says, “<i>With the heart</i> 
man believeth unto righteousness.”<note n="555" id="iv.iv.v-p42.1"><p class="normal" id="iv.iv.v-p43"><scripRef id="iv.iv.v-p43.1" passage="Rom. x. 10" parsed="|Rom|10|10|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Rom.10.10">Rom. x. 10</scripRef>.</p></note> That light and discerning 
respecting the truths of the gospel, and the character of Christ, which is implied 
in true faith, is not mere speculation, but depends on the disposition and exercises 
of the heart. Therefore Christ says to the Jews, “how can ye believe, which receive 
honour one <pb n="499" id="iv.iv.v-Page_499" />of another; and seek not the honour which cometh from God 
only?”<note n="556" id="iv.iv.v-p43.2"><p class="normal" id="iv.iv.v-p44"><scripRef id="iv.iv.v-p44.1" passage="John v. 44" parsed="|John|5|44|0|0" osisRef="Bible:John.5.44">John v. 44</scripRef>.</p></note> In these words it is declared that selfishness and 
pride, which are directly opposed to that love which consists in disinterested affection, 
do blind the mind to spiritual objects, and effectually shut out that light and 
discerning which is essential to faith in Christ; and that they only whose hearts 
are benevolent and humble, have the true light, and see spiritual objects as faith 
beholds them.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.iv.v-p45">We are taught the same thing by Christ, when speaking expressly 
and particularly of illumination. His words are, “The light of the body is the eye: 
If therefore thine eye be single, thy whole body shall be full of light. But if 
thine eye be evil, thy whole body shall be full of darkness. If therefore the light 
that is in thee, be darkness, how great is that darkness.”<note n="557" id="iv.iv.v-p45.1"><p class="normal" id="iv.iv.v-p46"><scripRef id="iv.iv.v-p46.1" passage="Matt. vi. 22" parsed="|Matt|6|22|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Matt.6.22">Matt. vi. 22</scripRef>, <scripRef passage="Matt 6:23" id="iv.iv.v-p46.2" parsed="|Matt|6|23|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Matt.6.23">23</scripRef>.</p></note> 
Our divine teacher is here speaking of moral or spiritual light and darkness, and 
says, that these are as the eye of the mind is, and depend on the single or evil 
eye. If we attend to the scripture, we may learn what is meant by the single and 
evil eye. Jesus Christ says, “From within, out of the heart of men, proceed evil 
thoughts, adulteries, fornications, murders, thefts, covetousness, wickedness, deceit, 
lasciviousness, <i>an evil eye</i>, blasphemy, pride, foolishness: All these evil 
things come from within, and defile the man.”<note n="558" id="iv.iv.v-p46.3"><p class="normal" id="iv.iv.v-p47"><scripRef id="iv.iv.v-p47.1" passage="Mark vii. 21" parsed="|Mark|7|21|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Mark.7.21">Mark vii. 21</scripRef>, <scripRef passage="Mark 7:22" id="iv.iv.v-p47.2" parsed="|Mark|7|22|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Mark.7.22">22</scripRef>, <scripRef passage="Mark 7:23" id="iv.iv.v-p47.3" parsed="|Mark|7|23|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Mark.7.23">23</scripRef>.</p></note> 
From these words we learn, that an evil eye belongs to the heart, and is an exercise 
of the heart, as it cometh out of the heart. Therefore it is of a moral nature, 
and is itself criminal, as it is called an <i>evil thing</i>, and is ranked among 
other things, which are moral evils or sins, and defile men. We may infer from this 
with great certainty, that moral darkness belongs to the heart, and not the intellect, 
as distinguished from that.—That it consists in the exercise of the heart, and is 
in itself criminal, in every degree of it.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.iv.v-p48">And it may with equal certainty be determined, from other passages 
of scripture, what is the particular nature of that disposition and exercise which 
is called an evil eye, and in what this evil eye consists. Our Lord represents the 
householder, who hired men to work in his 
<pb n="500" id="iv.iv.v-Page_500" />vineyard, at different times in the day, and ordered his steward to 
give as much wages to those who had laboured but one hour, as to those who had laboured 
the whole day; as saying to one of the latter who complained of this, “Is 
thine <i>eye evil</i>, because I am good?”<note n="559" id="iv.iv.v-p48.1"><p class="normal" id="iv.iv.v-p49"><scripRef id="iv.iv.v-p49.1" passage="Matt. xx. 15" parsed="|Matt|20|15|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Matt.20.15">Matt. xx. 15</scripRef>.</p></note> 
Here a contracted, selfish, envious spirit, is called an evil eye; and is opposed 
to goodness of heart, of benevolence, which is here called a good eye; and must 
be the same with a single eye. An evil eye always means selfishness, and that affection 
of heart which is included in it, whenever it is mentioned in the scripture. There 
are the following instances of this. When God commands the Israelites to open their 
hand wide, and give liberally to their poor brethren, he adds the following words; 
“Beware that there be not a thought in thy wicked heart, saying, the seventh year, 
the year of release is at hand: And <i>thine eye be evil</i> against thy poor brother, 
and thou givest him nought, and he cry unto the Lord against thee, and it be sin 
unto thee.”<note n="560" id="iv.iv.v-p49.2"><p class="normal" id="iv.iv.v-p50"><scripRef id="iv.iv.v-p50.1" passage="Deut. xv. 9" parsed="|Deut|15|9|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Deut.15.9">Deut. xv. 9</scripRef>.</p></note> 
Here again, an evil eye is a selfish disposition of heart, in opposition to goodness 
or benevolence of heart. The same thing is denoted by an evil eye in the following 
passages: “Eat thou not the bread of him that hath an <i>evil eye</i>; neither 
desire thou his dainty meat. For as be thinketh in his heart, so is he: Eat and 
drink, saith he to thee; but his heart is not with thee.”<note n="561" id="iv.iv.v-p50.2"><p class="normal" id="iv.iv.v-p51"><scripRef id="iv.iv.v-p51.1" passage="Prov. xxiii. 6" parsed="|Prov|23|6|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Prov.23.6">Prov. xxiii. 6</scripRef>, 
<scripRef passage="Prov 23:7" id="iv.iv.v-p51.2" parsed="|Prov|23|7|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Prov.23.7">7</scripRef>.</p></note> 
Here his evil eye consists in the thoughts and disposition of his heart, which are 
opposed to his generous benevolent expressions, and really against his guest, which 
can be nothing but a selfish, covetous disposition, “He that hasteth to be rich, 
hath an evil eye.”<note n="562" id="iv.iv.v-p51.3"><p class="normal" id="iv.iv.v-p52"><scripRef id="iv.iv.v-p52.1" passage="Prov. xxviii. 22" parsed="|Prov|28|22|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Prov.28.22">Prov. xxviii. 22</scripRef>.</p></note> Nothing but a selfish, inordinate 
craving, and a covetous spirit, will prompt men to make haste to be rich.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.iv.v-p53">Having found what an evil eye is, that it consists in that disposition 
and those exercises of heart which are evil and criminal, in that self love which 
is contrary to benevolence and true goodness of heart, and fills the mind with moral 
darkness; it is easy to determine what is meant by a single eye, viz. that disposition 
of heart, which is opposed to selfishness. It is an upright, good, benevolent heart, 
or true, disinterested, benevolent <pb n="501" id="iv.iv.v-Page_501" />love. This is evident from the 
passages of scripture already mentioned. A liberal, benevolent disposition, and 
a good eye, which is the same, is set in opposition to an evil eye. The single eye 
is the same with a bountiful eye. “He that hath a <i>bountiful eye</i> shall be 
blessed: For he giveth of his bread to the poor.”<note n="563" id="iv.iv.v-p53.1"><p class="normal" id="iv.iv.v-p54"><scripRef id="iv.iv.v-p54.1" passage="Prov. xxii. 9" parsed="|Prov|22|9|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Prov.22.9">Prov. xxii. 9</scripRef>.</p></note></p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.iv.v-p55">That the single eye consists in benevolence and goodness of heart, 
is evident, (if any farther evidence be needed) in that the word in the original
<span lang="EL" class="Greek" id="iv.iv.v-p55.1">απλους</span>, translated <i>single</i>, when a substantive,
<span lang="EL" class="Greek" id="iv.iv.v-p55.2">απλοτης</span>, is used for liberality, bountifulness, 
or benevolence. It is so used in the following passages of scripture. “He that giveth, 
let him do it with <i>simplicity</i>.” [<span lang="EL" class="Greek" id="iv.iv.v-p55.3">απλοτηστι</span>] 
That is, with a liberal, bountiful heart.<note n="564" id="iv.iv.v-p55.4"><p class="normal" id="iv.iv.v-p56"><scripRef id="iv.iv.v-p56.1" passage="Rom. xii. 8" parsed="|Rom|12|8|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Rom.12.8">Rom. xii. 8</scripRef>.</p></note></p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.iv.v-p57">“How that in a great trial of affliction, the abundance of their 
joy, and their deep poverty, abounded unto the riches of their liberality.”<note n="565" id="iv.iv.v-p57.1"><p class="normal" id="iv.iv.v-p58">
<scripRef id="iv.iv.v-p58.1" passage="2 Cor. viii. 2" parsed="|2Cor|8|2|0|0" osisRef="Bible:2Cor.8.2">2 Cor. viii. 2</scripRef>.</p></note> 
[<span lang="EL" class="Greek" id="iv.iv.v-p58.2">απλοτητος</span>] “Being enriched in every thing,
<i>to all bountifulness</i>”<note n="566" id="iv.iv.v-p58.3"><p class="normal" id="iv.iv.v-p59"><scripRef passage="2Cor 9:11" id="iv.iv.v-p59.1" parsed="|2Cor|9|11|0|0" osisRef="Bible:2Cor.9.11">Chap. ix. 11</scripRef>.</p></note> 
[<span lang="EL" class="Greek" id="iv.iv.v-p59.2">εἰς πασαν απλοτητα</span>] “While, by the experiment 
of this ministration, they glorify God for your professed subjection unto the gospel 
of Christ, and for your <i>liberal distribution</i> [<span lang="EL" class="Greek" id="iv.iv.v-p59.3">απλοτητ 
της κοινωνίας</span> unto them, and unto all men.”<note n="567" id="iv.iv.v-p59.4"><p class="normal" id="iv.iv.v-p60"><scripRef passage="2Cor 9:13" id="iv.iv.v-p60.1" parsed="|2Cor|9|13|0|0" osisRef="Bible:2Cor.9.13">
Verse 13</scripRef>.</p></note> “Who giveth to all men <i>liberally</i>, [<span lang="EL" class="Greek" id="iv.iv.v-p60.2">απλως</span>] 
and upbraideth not.”<note n="568" id="iv.iv.v-p60.3"><p class="normal" id="iv.iv.v-p61"><scripRef id="iv.iv.v-p61.1" passage="James i. 5" parsed="|Jas|1|5|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Jas.1.5">James i. 5</scripRef>.</p></note></p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.iv.v-p62">It is easy to see that this representation of a single and an 
evil eye agrees exactly with those passages of scripture which have been mentioned 
above, in which disinterested love, as opposed to selfishness, is spoken of as essential 
to true light and discerning, with respect to things of a moral nature; so that 
he who <i>loveth</i>, knoweth God, and he who loveth not, knoweth not God; and consequently 
has no true knowledge of the things of the moral world; but is in total darkness. 
And that self love, by which a man hateth his brother, is moral darkness itself, 
and causeth him to walk in darkness. Herein the apostles perfectly agree with Jesus 
Christ, when he says that a single eye, that is, love, or a benevolent disposition 
of heart, is that which illuminates the mind, and is moral light and discerning: 
And that <pb n="502" id="iv.iv.v-Page_502" />the evil eye, that is, selfishness, is moral darkness, and 
holds die mind in this darkness, where it reigns. Love or universal, disinterested 
benevolence, which implies all moral goodness, or righteousness and holiness, is 
the single eye which illuminates the mind, and fills the heart with moral divine 
light. This <i>single eye</i> fixes on one grand object, the glory of God, which 
implies the greatest good of his eternal kingdom, and the best good of every individual 
creature, so far as it tends to promote the general good, or is consistent with 
it. The evil eye is selfishness, and all that is implied in this, in which all moral 
evil or sin consists. This is moral blindness, or spiritual darkness; and while 
the heart is under the dominion of this, all the light which is set before the man, 
and all his speculations, will not in the least remove this darkness, but all the 
light that is in him is darkness. And “how great is that darkness!”</p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.iv.v-p63">The same thing is asserted by Jesus Christ in the following passages. 
“Every one that doeth evil,” that is, is wholly selfish in all he does, “hateth 
the light, neither cometh to the light, lest his deeds should be reproved. But he 
that doth truth,” he that loveth, “cometh to the light.”<note n="569" id="iv.iv.v-p63.1"><p class="normal" id="iv.iv.v-p64"><scripRef id="iv.iv.v-p64.1" passage="John iii. 20" parsed="|John|3|20|0|0" osisRef="Bible:John.3.20">John iii. 20</scripRef>, <scripRef passage="John 3:21" id="iv.iv.v-p64.2" parsed="|John|3|21|0|0" osisRef="Bible:John.3.21">21</scripRef>.</p></note> 
“If any man <i>will do his will</i>, he shall know of the doctrine, whether it be 
of God, or whether I speak of myself.”<note n="570" id="iv.iv.v-p64.3"><p class="normal" id="iv.iv.v-p65"><scripRef id="iv.iv.v-p65.1" passage="John vii. 17" parsed="|John|7|17|0|0" osisRef="Bible:John.7.17">John vii. 17</scripRef>.</p></note> He only doth the 
will of God who loveth: He shall know God and Christ; he and he only has light and 
discerning to see and know the truth, and distinguish it from error.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.iv.v-p66">St. Paul sets this point in the same light, when he says, “And 
this I pray, that your love may abound yet more and more, in knowledge, and in all 
judgment.”<note n="571" id="iv.iv.v-p66.1"><p class="normal" id="iv.iv.v-p67"><scripRef id="iv.iv.v-p67.1" passage="Philip. i. 9" parsed="|Phil|1|9|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Phil.1.9">Philip. i. 9</scripRef>.</p></note> 
The word here translated judgment, signifies taste and sensibility of heart, which 
is true moral light and discerning. This knowledge and judgment is here represented 
as consisting in love, or the concomitant or fruit of it.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.iv.v-p68">The above scriptural account of the moral darkness of the minds 
of depraved men, and of divine illumination or spiritual light and discerning, is 
agreeable to reason, and supported by it; and is implied in what has been generally 
granted by those who have attended 
<pb n="503" id="iv.iv.v-Page_503" />to the subject. It has been generally, if not universally conceded, 
and seems to be a plain dictate of reason and common sense, that the inordinate 
lusts of men, when they prevail and govern, do blind their minds with respect to 
moral objects: so that those lusts and evil inclinations of men must be suppressed, 
and mortified, in some degree, at least, in order to their discerning these objects, 
and seeing them in a true and proper light. The man who gives himself up to covetousness 
and worldly pursuits, to unrighteousness or sensuality, must, by the reigning of 
any or all of these lusts, be blind to the beauty and excellence of spiritual, moral 
objects, and truths, and those exercises of mind in which true virtue and holiness 
consists. And there is no other way to recover such an one to a true and proper 
discerning of the reality, importance, the beauty and excellence of the truths and 
objects of the moral world, including God, his law, Jesus Christ, the gospel, the 
nature and excellence of true religion, but by an alteration in the taste, disposition 
and desires of his heart, and recovering him to a contrary taste and disposition 
of mind.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.iv.v-p69">And it is equally reasonable and certain that the more inward 
lusts of the heart, selfishness and pride, which are the essence, root, strength 
and support of these lusts which have been mentioned, and of all others, should 
be attended with moral blindness, where they reign, and are blindness, and moral 
darkness itself: And that true illumination and moral light consist in an opposite 
disposition and taste of mind. Things of a moral nature have relation to the exercises 
of the heart; and sin and holiness consist in self love and benevolence, as has 
been shown. He whose heart is destitute of benevolent affection can have no true 
idea of it, because ideas of exercises of heart are obtained by having exercises 
of that kind, and no other way. Therefore he who exercises no true love, knows not 
the true moral character of God; for this consists in love. And when this affection 
takes place in his heart, he has spiritual discerning, moral light breaks in upon 
his mind, he is turned from darkness to light, and sees and knows God, in his true 
moral character, and has some right view of things of the moral world. Agreeable 
to this, Solomon <pb n="504" id="iv.iv.v-Page_504" />says, “Evil men understand not judgment: But they 
that seek the Lord, understand all things.”<note n="572" id="iv.iv.v-p69.1"><p class="normal" id="iv.iv.v-p70"><scripRef id="iv.iv.v-p70.1" passage="Prov. xxviii. 5" parsed="|Prov|28|5|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Prov.28.5">Prov. xxviii. 5</scripRef>.</p></note></p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.iv.v-p71">This light and discerning, by which the true beauty and excellence 
of moral objects is seen, is not attainable by any kind or degree of mere intellectual 
speculation, as distinguished from relish and exercise of the heart. Moral beauty, 
amiableness and excellence is not the object of mere intellect or understanding, 
as distinguished from the will or heart; it is the object of taste, which belongs 
to the heart, and implies inclination and exercise of heart, and consists in it. 
Beauty and amiableness is discerned by taste; and seeing beauty implies inclination 
to it, or love of it. Benevolent, disinterested affection, which, as has been observed, 
is the single eye, is that in which true moral taste consists. This belongs to the 
heart, and where this exists, things of the moral world appear in their true beauty 
and amiableness, and are relished and loved. On the contrary, self love, which implies 
every sinful affection and lust, is that in which a wrong bias and taste of heart 
consists. It is blind to moral beauty; and those moral objects and affections, in 
which all the true beauty, amiableness and excellence in the universe consist, appear 
disagreeable and odious, so far as they are seen, which is real aversion, and hatred 
of them. This is blindness indeed! The only moral blindness, and the greatest darkness 
and delusion that can be in nature. It calls evil good, and good evil; it puts darkness 
for light, and light for darkness; bitter for sweet, and sweet for bitter.<note n="573" id="iv.iv.v-p71.1"><p class="normal" id="iv.iv.v-p72"><scripRef id="iv.iv.v-p72.1" passage="Isa. v. 20" parsed="|Isa|5|20|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Isa.5.20">Isa. v. 20</scripRef>.—All this is implied in what Hierocles, a heathen, 
has observed and asserted, viz. “The mind, destitute of virtue, cannot see the beauty 
of truth.”</p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.iv.v-p73">“Spiritual understanding consists primarily In <i>a sense of heart 
of spiritual beauty</i>; I say, <i>a sense of heart</i>; for it is not speculation 
merely that is concerned in this kind of understanding: Nor can there be a clear 
distinction made between the two faculties of understanding and will, as: acting 
distinctly and separately, in this matter. When the mind is sensible of the sweet 
beauty and amiableness of a thing, that implies a sensibleness of sweetness and 
delight in the presence of the idea of it. And this sensibleness of the amiableness 
or delightfulness of beauty, carries in the very nature of it the sense of the heart; 
or an effect and impression the soul is the subject of, as a subject possessed of 
taste, inclination and will.” Edwards on Gracious Affections. Page 163, 164. First 
edition.</p></note></p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.iv.v-p74">This will appear more evident and clear, perhaps, by considering 
the nature and tendency of self love, which <pb n="505" id="iv.iv.v-Page_505" />comprehends every vice 
and lust of the mind, and is exercised in all sin; and the opposite nature of universal 
disinterested benevolence, in which all true virtue is implied.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.iv.v-p75">Self love is an evil eye, which will not admit the light that 
discovers and brings into clear view, all the grand, beautiful and glorious objects 
in the moral world. It is fast shut against all those, and excludes them wholly 
from sight. It sees and regards but one infinitely little, diminutive object, <i>
self</i>; it sinks the mind down and contracts it to this, and will not look at 
any other object, or interest, but this contracted selfish one. It feels as if this 
was the great and only interest, and subordinates every other being and interest, 
and every possible public good, to a private personal interest, seeing no other 
good but that which is suited to promote a personal, selfish good. This self love 
is therefore, in the nature of it, total blindness to the infinite importance of 
the being of God, and the amiableness and excellence of his character; and to the 
worth and glory of his kingdom, and desirableness of the greatest public good. And 
consequently, does not see the amiableness and worth of that disinterested, universal 
benevolence, which seeks the greatest good of the whole, and fixes on this, as the 
grand and most desirable object, and subordinates the interest of individuals to 
the common interest, and greatest good of the whole; and cannot have any relish 
or taste for this; but must be displeased with it and hate it, and all the beings 
who are of this character, as they are disposed to sacrifice and give up all his 
personal interest, which he holds as the only good, when necessary to promote the 
general good. This self love therefore is enmity against God, and the general good; 
and that affection must be hateful to the selfish person, which seeks the glory 
of God, and the greatest good of his kingdom, and does not regard, but gives up 
the interest of individuals, so far as the latter is inconsistent with the former. 
Thus self love is totally blind to the only great and real good in the universe, 
and to all the true beauty and excellence in it: This is the blindness, the darkness 
and deception of every one who loves his own self only. This darkness, as it has 
its foundation in 
<pb n="506" id="iv.iv.v-Page_506" />the heart, and consists in the reigning affection of it, cannot be 
removed by any merely intellectual light, knowledge and reasoning, but remains in 
its greatness and full strength, whatever the understanding, considered as distinct 
from the will, may dictate, as there is no connection between mere intellectual 
knowledge, and the taste and inclination of the heart, and the former cannot alter 
the latter. This is verified by experience, in the innumerable instances of the 
taste and inclination of the heart contradicting and counteracting the conviction 
and dictates of the understanding, the former choosing that as good and best, and 
pursuing it, while the latter pronounces it to be wrong and evil.<note n="574" id="iv.iv.v-p75.1"><p class="normal" id="iv.iv.v-p76">This was perceived by a heathen poet, and expressed in the following 
words:</p>
<div class="verse" lang="LA" id="iv.iv.v-p76.1">
Sed trahit invitam nova vis, aliudque cupido; 
Mens aliud suadet. Video meliora proboque: 
Deteriora sequor.—
</div>
<p class="center" id="iv.iv.v-p77"><i>Translated thus</i>.</p>
<div class="verse" id="iv.iv.v-p77.1">
“My reason <i>this</i>, my passion <i>that</i>, persuades; 
“I see the right, and I approve it too, 
“Condemn the wrong, and yet the wrong pursue.”
</div></note></p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.iv.v-p78">Disinterested, universal benevolence, or that disposition of heart 
which implies this, which is “an honest and good, or benevolent heart,” is the
<span class="sc" id="iv.iv.v-p78.1">single eye</span>. This gives that light to the mind, in which 
it discerns the grand objects comprised in universal being; and sees what is the 
true, the greatest and only good of the universe; and fixes on this as the first 
object of choice and pursuit. This brings into view the first cause of all, the 
infinite source, and the sum of all being, as really existing, and sees him to be 
the first and great object of regard and benevolence. This discerns, tastes and 
relishes the true moral beauty and excellence of universal benevolence; approves 
of it and delights in it as the supreme moral good, and as comprehending the whole 
of it. It sees God as infinitely great, and infinitely benevolent or good, rejoices 
in his felicity and glory, and says, “Let him reign supreme, and be glorified to 
the highest degree forever,” as involving the greatest good, the highest happiness 
and glory of his kingdom: It is pleased with the divine moral character, comprehended 
in his infinite benevolence or goodness, and delights in <pb n="507" id="iv.iv.v-Page_507" />it above 
all things else. Thus he who <i>loveth</i>, knoweth God, for God is <i>love</i>.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.iv.v-p79">And he who has this <i>honest and good heart</i>, this dis. interested, 
benevolent affection, sees the beauty, importance, righteousness and goodness of 
the law of God, which requires perfect love, universal benevolence, with all that 
affection which is involved in it, of every moral agent, on pain of his highest 
displeasure. He consequently sees all opposition to this law to be infinitely odious 
and detestable; and therefore views his own character, as a sinner, as unspeakably 
hateful, and, abhors himself, and sees the reason why God does hate all sin, and 
the propriety and desirableness that he should express and manifest his high displeasure 
at it, and infinite opposition to it, in threatening it with a just, deserved, endless 
punishment. And by all this, he is prepared to behold and understand the gospel, 
and see the truth, wisdom and glory of it, which exhibits infinite benevolence in 
the most advantageous and striking light, and is suited in the best manner to promote 
the honour of God, and the greatest happiness of his kingdom. And the character 
of Christ will come into view as infinitely amiable, worthy and important; and the 
benevolent heart will approve, love and rejoice. This is that knowledge of the only 
true God, and Jesus Christ whom he has sent, which is eternal life: It is the light 
of life, which is the attainment of all the followers of Christ. He who hath this 
love, “abideth in the light, and there is no occasion of stumbling in him.”<note n="575" id="iv.iv.v-p79.1"><p class="normal" id="iv.iv.v-p80">
<scripRef id="iv.iv.v-p80.1" passage="John viii. 12" parsed="|John|8|12|0|0" osisRef="Bible:John.8.12">John viii. 12</scripRef>. <scripRef passage="John 17:3" id="iv.iv.v-p80.2" parsed="|John|17|3|0|0" osisRef="Bible:John.17.3">xvii. 3</scripRef>. <scripRef passage="1John 2:10" id="iv.iv.v-p80.3" parsed="|1John|2|10|0|0" osisRef="Bible:1John.2.10">
1 John ii. 10</scripRef>.</p></note></p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.iv.v-p81">From all that has been now observed on this subject, it is easy 
to see, that divine illumination is effected by the renovation of the heart of man, 
by the Spirit of God, by which it is no longer wholly selfish, and under the dominion 
of pride and lust; but is formed to universal, disinterested benevolence, or true 
love. Nothing is wanting but such a change of heart, in order to the true light 
of the moral world shining into it. By this renovation the single eye is formed, 
and the mind is full of light. This is that change, and illumination which is ascribed 
in scripture to the Spirit of God. This is that change of heart which Jesus calls 
a being 
<pb n="508" id="iv.iv.v-Page_508" />born again of the Spirit, without which men cannot see the kingdom 
of God.<note n="576" id="iv.iv.v-p81.1"><p class="normal" id="iv.iv.v-p82"><scripRef id="iv.iv.v-p82.1" passage="John iii. 3" parsed="|John|3|3|0|0" osisRef="Bible:John.3.3">John iii. 3</scripRef>, <scripRef passage="John 3:5" id="iv.iv.v-p82.2" parsed="|John|3|5|0|0" osisRef="Bible:John.3.5">5</scripRef>.</p></note> And by which their eyes are opened, and they 
are turned from darkness to marvellous light, and know the only true God, and Jesus 
Christ whom he hath sent. By this renovation a wise and understanding heart is given, 
and God gives a <i>heart to know him</i>. And he shines in the heart, by giving 
this single eye, to give the light of the knowledge of the glory of God, in the 
face of Jesus Christ.<note n="577" id="iv.iv.v-p82.3"><p class="normal" id="iv.iv.v-p83"><scripRef id="iv.iv.v-p83.1" passage="Jer. xxiv. 7" parsed="|Jer|24|7|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Jer.24.7">Jer. xxiv. 7</scripRef>. <scripRef passage="2Cor 4:6" id="iv.iv.v-p83.2" parsed="|2Cor|4|6|0|0" osisRef="Bible:2Cor.4.6">2 Cor. iv. 
6</scripRef>.</p></note> This is the same with giving a new heart, and a new spirit.<note n="578" id="iv.iv.v-p83.3"><p class="normal" id="iv.iv.v-p84">
<scripRef id="iv.iv.v-p84.1" passage="Ezek. xxxvi. 26" parsed="|Ezek|36|26|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Ezek.36.26">Ezek. xxxvi. 26</scripRef>.</p></note> And is expressed in the following words: “I will put my 
laws into their minds, and write them in their hearts. And they shall not teach 
every man his neighbour, and every man his brother, saying, know the Lord; <i>for 
all shall know me, from the least to the greatest</i>.”<note n="579" id="iv.iv.v-p84.2"><p class="normal" id="iv.iv.v-p85"><scripRef id="iv.iv.v-p85.1" passage="Heb. viii. 10" parsed="|Heb|8|10|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Heb.8.10">Heb. viii. 10</scripRef>, <scripRef passage="Heb 8:11" id="iv.iv.v-p85.2" parsed="|Heb|8|11|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Heb.8.11">11</scripRef>.</p></note> 
Jesus Christ speaks of this illumination when he says, “It is written in the prophets, 
and they shall all be <i>taught of God</i>. Every one therefore that hath heard, 
and hath <i>learned</i> of the Father, cometh unto me.”<note n="580" id="iv.iv.v-p85.3"><p class="normal" id="iv.iv.v-p86"><scripRef id="iv.iv.v-p86.1" passage="John vi. 45" parsed="|John|6|45|0|0" osisRef="Bible:John.6.45">John vi. 45</scripRef>.</p></note> 
And when he says to Peter, upon his professing his faith in him as the Christ, the 
Son of the living God, “Blessed art thou, Simon Barjona, for flesh and blood hath 
not revealed it unto thee, but my Father which is in heaven.”<note n="581" id="iv.iv.v-p86.2"><p class="normal" id="iv.iv.v-p87"><scripRef id="iv.iv.v-p87.1" passage="Matt. xvi. 17" parsed="|Matt|16|17|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Matt.16.17">Matt. xvi. 17</scripRef>.</p></note>  
St. Paul speaks of this renovation of heart as necessary in order to true light 
and knowledge, and that the latter is implied in the former. “Be not conformed to 
this world: But be ye transformed, <i>by the renewing of your mind</i>, that ye 
may prove what is that good, and acceptable, and perfect will of God.”<note n="582" id="iv.iv.v-p87.2"><p class="normal" id="iv.iv.v-p88"><scripRef id="iv.iv.v-p88.1" passage="Rom. xii. 2" parsed="|Rom|12|2|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Rom.12.2">Rom. 
xii. 2</scripRef>.</p></note></p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.iv.v-p89">This illumination, therefore, does not consist in discovering, 
or revealing to men any new truth not already made known and contained in divine 
revelation; but in forming the heart to true discerning, and hereby opening the 
eye of the mind, to see the truths revealed in the scriptures; or in forming the 
single eye, which will receive the light, which before shined; but was not admitted, 
and could not shine in the heart, because the eye was evil, and shut against the 
truth. This is expressed by the Psalmist in the following words: “Open thou mine 
eyes, that I may behold wondrous things out <pb n="509" id="iv.iv.v-Page_509" />of thy law.”<note n="583" id="iv.iv.v-p89.1"><p class="normal" id="iv.iv.v-p90"><scripRef id="iv.iv.v-p90.1" passage="Psalm cxix. 18" parsed="|Ps|119|18|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Ps.119.18">Psalm 
cxix. 18</scripRef>.</p></note> The scriptures contain a fulness of moral light and instruction; 
they will make him wise unto salvation, who understands and believes; who discerns 
the truths there revealed. There is therefore no need that any new truth should 
be immediately suggested to the mind which is not contained in the Bible. All that 
is wanting, is to have the mind disposed and prepared to receive the light which 
is extant, and shines in the word of God: This is to have a single eye, a new, benevolent 
heart. He who has such an heart, is hereby brought into a new moral world; sees 
the things revealed in the scriptures in a new light; they now appear in their reality 
and divinity, beautiful, consistent, harmonious, important, and affecting, as they 
never did before, infinitely above any thing else that can be imagined. Thus the 
light shines in the heart to give the light of the knowledge of the glory of God, 
in the face of Jesus Christ.<note n="584" id="iv.iv.v-p90.2"><p class="normal" id="iv.iv.v-p91"><scripRef id="iv.iv.v-p91.1" passage="2 Cor. iv. 6" parsed="|2Cor|4|6|0|0" osisRef="Bible:2Cor.4.6">2 Cor. iv. 6</scripRef>.</p></note> This establishes the heart 
in a belief and assurance of the truth of the gospel and of divine revelation, as 
no degree of mere speculation can do. This is expressed by St. John in the following 
words: “We know that the Son of God is come, and <i>hath given us an understanding</i> 
that we may know him that is true. This is the true God, and eternal life.”<note n="585" id="iv.iv.v-p91.2"><p class="normal" id="iv.iv.v-p92">
<scripRef id="iv.iv.v-p92.1" passage="1 John v. 20" parsed="|1John|5|20|0|0" osisRef="Bible:1John.5.20">1 John v. 20</scripRef>.</p></note></p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.iv.v-p93">As the renovation of the heart is but in a small degree at first, 
and the eye of the mind is not fully opened at once; but this work is begun in an 
imperfect degree, and carried on to perfection: So this light is comparatively small 
and imperfect in the beginning, and gradually increases, and the christian grows 
in grace, in holiness, and in the knowledge of Jesus Christ, which implies the knowledge 
of all divine things. “The path of the just is as the shining light, which shineth 
more and more to the perfect day.” And as the enlightened mind sees but in part, 
in this world, and is never omniscient, some truths and objects are more particularly 
and clearly in view at one time, and others at another: which may be owing to particular 
divine internal influence, or the agency of other invisible beings, or to external 
circumstances, and occurrences; all which are under the immediate influence and 
guidance of the <pb n="510" id="iv.iv.v-Page_510" />omnipotent, omnipresent, all-wise Being, who worketh 
all in all.<note n="586" id="iv.iv.v-p93.1"><p class="normal" id="iv.iv.v-p94"><scripRef id="iv.iv.v-p94.1" passage="1 Cor. xii. 6" parsed="|1Cor|12|6|0|0" osisRef="Bible:1Cor.12.6">1 Cor. xii. 6</scripRef>.</p></note></p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.iv.v-p95">It is proper to observe here, that though the heart or will be 
the seat of this illumination, and moral light and darkness are as the disposition 
of the heart is, yet the whole mind, in all the faculties of it, is concerned, and 
some way included and affected in this affair. Intellectual light and conviction, 
considered as distinct from the heart, is included in this illumination. Ideas are 
conveyed to the heart by this medium. Where there are no speculative ideas, which 
are in some measure agreeable to the truth, and no right judgment and conviction 
respecting intellectual objects; the benevolent heart will not be properly illuminated, 
or be under advantage to exercise itself properly towards external objects. When 
the single eye is formed, it will receive light and view the objects of moral sight, 
by the medium of the intellect. Therefore there appears to be a propriety, that 
there should be some degree of speculative light and conviction in the minds of 
the adult, before a new heart or single eye is given, in order to prepare them to 
discern the truth properly, and to have exercises agreeable to it.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.iv.v-p96">And when a new heart, a single eye is given, it will help to rectify 
the mistakes which may have been made by the intellectual judgment, as the latter 
is influenced and biassed in judging of things by the taste and inclination of the 
heart. So far as the heart is honest and good, the prejudices which bias the speculative 
judgment will be removed, and the mind will speculate more clearly, and a conviction 
of the truth will be more clear, strong and steady; and the attention of the mind 
to moral divine subjects will be more fixed and engaged, and a foundation is laid 
for die enlargement of the mind in intellectual knowledge of these things, and the 
rational powers of the soul; for the taste and benevolent exercises of the new heart, 
are perfectly rational, and will be approved by right reason, and a rectified judgment. 
Thus, by the renovation of the heart, forming it to a right taste, a disposition 
to disinterested benevolence, all the powers of the soul are sanctified; the ignorance <pb n="511" id="iv.iv.v-Page_511" />
and mistakes of reason and judgment, which originated from an evil eye, or self 
love, are removed; the whole mind is enlightened, and all the faculties of the soul 
harmonize, and do their office well. When the heart is perfectly right, in the exercise 
of benevolent, disinterested affection, the soul is full of light, and the man is 
perfectly holy, in all his faculties and powers.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.iv.v-p97">The sum of what has been said above on the subject of divine illumination 
is this. As all mankind are, while in their natural state, totally depraved and 
sinful, and this depravity is in the nature of it moral darkness, they are wholly 
blind to the things of the Spirit of God. This blindness has its foundation in the 
heart, and consists in the wrong taste and sinful inclination of that, and not in 
any natural defect in the intellectual and reasoning faculties of the soul, as distinguished 
from the inclination of the heart. This blindness is therefore a <i>wilful blindness</i>, 
as it consists in the disposition, and exercise of the heart or will. They have 
eyes, they have all the natural mental faculties, which are necessary to discern 
spiritual things, as well as any other objects: But they see them not, because they 
voluntarily shut their eyes, and refuse to open them, and admit the light which 
shines around them, as this light of divine truth is above all things disagreeable 
to them; they hate it, and will not come unto it, lest their deeds should be reproved. 
This blindness is therefore wholly the fault of man, and criminal in every degree 
of it, being moral depravity itself. It consists in self love, which implies the 
whole of moral depravity, of every thing in the heart that is or can be contrary 
to the law of God. This is the evil eye, which fills the whole mind with moral darkness. 
This is blindness to invisible spiritual things; does not see the beauty, consistence 
and harmony of moral truth; and therefore has no sense and cordial belief of their 
reality, or that they do indeed exist, whatever reason and speculative judgment 
may dictate. Therefore, “The fool,” every man in his natural state, who is in this 
moral darkness, “saith in his heart, there is no God.”<note n="587" id="iv.iv.v-p97.1"><p class="normal" id="iv.iv.v-p98"><scripRef id="iv.iv.v-p98.1" passage="Psalm xiv. 1" parsed="|Ps|14|1|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Ps.14.1">Psalm xiv. 1</scripRef>.</p></note> 
This is the feeling and language of a heart wholly depraved and under the power 
of self love: Which cannot be removed <pb n="512" id="iv.iv.v-Page_512" />by any mere speculations and 
reasoning on the subject, so long as the heart is thus wholly corrupt. And this 
selfishness and pride, with all the lusts implied in this, tend to weaken and pervert 
the reasoning powers of the mind, and bribe and bias the reason and speculative 
judgment, so as to reject the truth, and embrace error in speculation, respecting 
things of a moral nature. And this is the ground and source of all the false, unreasonable 
reasoning, and errors in judgment upon subjects of a moral nature, which do take 
place among mankind. And therefore all false reasoning, and every error and delusion 
in speculation and judgment, is blameable and sinful, as all these have their foundation 
in the corrupt biasses of the heart, and are altogether governed and produced by 
them.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.iv.v-p99">The real christian is, in becoming such, turned from this darkness 
to marvellous light, which is effected by the omnipotent influences of the Spirit 
of God, in the renovation of the heart, which was before totally corrupt, forming 
it to disinterested, universal benevolence, and so making it an honest and good 
heart; and forming the single eye, by which the truths revealed in the scriptures, 
relating to the being and perfections of God, his law and moral government; the 
state and character of man; the character and works of the Mediator; the way of 
salvation by him; the nature of duty and true holiness, &amp;c. are seen in their true 
light, as realities, beautiful, divine, important, excellent, harmonious, glorious, 
and above all things else interesting and affecting; and the mind is filled with 
this spiritual, marvellous, glorious light. By this all the powers of the mind are 
enlarged and strengthened. Reason and judgment, being no longer biassed by an evil 
heart, are rectified,, and the reasoning, speculative faculty, is exerted in an 
honest, attentive pursuit, in the investigation of truth.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.iv.v-p100">Though the blindness of man in his natural, totally depraved state, 
be of a moral nature, and voluntary, and therefore wholly criminal; yet it is as 
great, and is as much beyond the power of means to remove it; and the man is as 
far from recovering himself to light, as if the blindness was owing to an essential 
defect in the natural powers of the soul: And the immediate, almighty <pb n="513" id="iv.iv.v-Page_513" />
energy of the divine Spirit is as necessary to remove this darkness, and illuminate 
the mind, as if natural faculties were wanting. Therefore this illumination is constantly 
ascribed in the scripture to God, as the agent and cause in producing this effect. 
It is a common observation, in which all agree, <i>that none are blinder than they 
who </i><span class="sc" id="iv.iv.v-p100.1">will not </span><i>see</i>. They have eyes, but see not. 
He who has eyes, and shuts them fast, and will not open them to admit the light, 
from an obstinate aversion from the light, is as much in the dark, as he who has 
no eyes; and the former can be no more made to see, than the latter, so long as 
his will is obstinately set against opening his eyes. And it may require the same 
power and agent to alter his disposition, and give him a contrary one, that is necessary 
to give eyes to him who has none. Yea, in the case before us, a greater exertion 
of power is necessary to form the single eye, than to create the natural faculties 
of the soul; for the former is effected in opposition to the whole strength of the 
will, and of Satan, who possesses the corrupt heart, and blinds the mind of them 
who do not believe; whereas there can be no opposition to the latter. Therefore 
this illumination is said in the scripture to be the effect of the exceeding great 
and mighty power of God.<note n="588" id="iv.iv.v-p100.2"><p class="normal" id="iv.iv.v-p101"><scripRef id="iv.iv.v-p101.1" passage="Eph. ii. 19" parsed="|Eph|2|19|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Eph.2.19">Eph. ii. 19</scripRef>. <scripRef passage="2Thes 1:11" id="iv.iv.v-p101.2" parsed="|2Thess|1|11|0|0" osisRef="Bible:2Thess.1.11">2 Thess. 
i. 11</scripRef>.</p></note></p>
<h2 id="iv.iv.v-p101.3">IMPROVEMENT.</h2>
<p class="normal" id="iv.iv.v-p102">I. <span class="sc" id="iv.iv.v-p102.1">From</span> the view we have now had of divine 
illumination, we are led particularly to reflect on the mistake many have made, 
in supposing that this saving light is communicated to the understanding, independent 
of the will or heart, and considered as a power distinct from it; that this light 
has its seat in the understanding, and belongs to that, and not to the will, the 
former, and not the latter, being the leading, governing power of the mind. This 
is not agreeable to the representation of the matter in the scripture, as has been 
shown. And this is not only unscriptural, but leads to dangerous and hurtful consequences.</p>
<pb n="514" id="iv.iv.v-Page_514" />
<p class="normal" id="iv.iv.v-p103">It has not been uncommon to represent the moral depravity of man, 
to consist in the understanding being darkened, as a distinct thing from the moral 
disorders and corruption of the heart; and to speak of enlightening the understanding, 
and subduing the will, or renewing the heart, as two distinct and different operations. 
This tends to darken and confuse the subject of divine illumination, and places 
it in that, in which it does not consist, according to the scriptures. And it represents 
the blindness of men to things of the Spirit of God, as a natural defect, and not 
in the least criminal, since the understanding, as distinguished from the will or 
heart, is not capable of virtue or vice, or of any thing that is criminal. For whatever 
darkness there be in the understanding, which is independent of the will, and does 
not originate from that, it is not a moral disorder, but purely natural; and therefore 
cannot be blameable. This way of representing this matter has therefore, doubtless, 
led many to consider the darkness in which all unrenewed men are, with respect to 
the things of the Spirit of God, as being in no degree criminal: And many, if not 
most, who have considered themselves in this state of darkness, have viewed it only 
as an unhappiness, and not as their sin.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.iv.v-p104">Others have supposed that nothing is necessary in order to enlighten 
men, and their becoming virtuous and holy, but to have light take place in the understanding, 
that the proper illumination of this, will influence and gain the will to a compliance 
with that which reason dictates to be truth, to be right and best. Of these, some 
suppose that nothing is done, in order to enlighten the understanding, and lead 
men to reason and judge right, but to set light before them by external application, 
in a way suited to excite the attention, &amp;c. Others suppose a powerful divine operation 
is necessary to let that light and conviction into the understanding, which will 
effectually move the will to choose that which is right, and persuade the heart 
to love God, and embrace the gospel, &amp;c. Both these really deny the moral depravity 
of man, either expressly or implicitly; at least, that the heart is totally corrupt. 
For if the will be always disposed and ready to comply with the truth <pb n="515" id="iv.iv.v-Page_515" />
whenever the understanding is convinced of it, and sees it; then the will is not 
depraved, there is no obstinacy and rebellion in the heart. All the defect is in 
the understanding, in not dictating the truth to the heart. But this defect in the 
understanding, however great it may be, is not a moral, but a natural defect: For, 
as has been shown, the understanding, considered as not including the will or heart, 
or the mere speculative faculty of the soul, is not a moral faculty, and is not 
capable of virtue or vice. According to this, the heart cannot be faulty, while 
it acts according to the dictates of the understanding, whatever they may be, which 
it is supposed always to do, and therefore never can be guilty of any moral evil: 
And the understanding, as such, and as distinguished from the will, is incapable 
of fault. Therefore there can be no such thing as moral evil, or sin; to be sure,
<i>man</i> is not capable of any such thing.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.iv.v-p105">It appears from what has been said on this subject, that all these 
suppositions are contrary to the representation which the scripture gives of this 
matter, and not agreeable to reason, or to fact and experience. They who thus set 
the understanding or intellect, considered as a faculty distinct from the will, 
first, as the leading faculty of the soul, by which the will is in all cases directed 
and governed, do certainly make a great mistake, and turn things upside down. The 
will is the only active faculty of the soul. The understanding, so far as it can 
be considered as a distinct faculty, and not implying any degree of will, is wholly 
passive, and not capable of action. Every motion and action of the mind of man is
<i>voluntary</i>; and therefore is the motion or action of the will. All mental 
exercise originates in the will, which is the seat of all moral action.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.iv.v-p106">Besides, they suppose what is in the nature of things absolutely 
impossible, and build their whole theory upon it, viz. That the understanding, independent 
of the heart, is capable of receiving or having a true idea of moral exercise, or 
of the real beauty and excellence of the things of the Spirit of God. Such ideas 
suppose taste and affection of heart, without which they cannot be perceived, or 
take place in the mind. This is as impossible, as that a blind man should have a 
true idea of <pb n="516" id="iv.iv.v-Page_516" />the beauty of light and colours; or that a man may perceive 
the sweetness of honey, and be pleased with it, by mere reasoning upon it, or touching 
it with his finger, while he has not the least degree of taste or relish for it, 
as has been before observed.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.iv.v-p107">II. From what has been said on this subject, other mistakes which 
have been made about divine illumination, are detected, and appear to be delusive 
and dangerous. Some have thought they were savingly enlightened, by their being 
led to see, in an unaccountable manner to them, an extraordinary external light 
and brightness; either by their bodily eyes, or in their imagination, which has 
affected them much. Or they have had their eyes opened, as they suppose, clearly 
to see Christ on the cross, or seated in heaven; and heaven, and the inhabitants 
of it, have been seen by them, &amp;c. All things of this kind, are as far from spiritual 
discoveries, as darkness is from light, and are mere imaginary conceptions, of which 
he who has the most depraved heart is as capable as any other person. And as they 
do not suppose a renewed heart, so they have no tendency to make it better.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.iv.v-p108">Others have thought themselves divinely taught and illuminated, 
by having some new thing, which they call truth, suggested to their minds, by a 
voice from heaven, or some immediate impulse, which is not contained in the Bible. 
And not a few, instead of learning their duty from the Bible, have expected, and 
thought they have had light, and direction given to them immediately from heaven, 
to make known what they were to say and do: and have thought themselves directed, 
in all their actions, by some invisible, divine impulse. All these are not only 
entirely different from divine illumination; but are dangerous delusions; and have 
proved fatal to many who have depended upon them.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.iv.v-p109">Imaginary ideas may attend divine illumination, and often do, 
in this very imperfect state: That is, a person may have a discerning heart given 
to him, by which he sees the saving truth; yet by the influence of his imagination, 
he may have many ideas imposed on his mind, which accompany the true light which 
shines in his heart But these mere imaginary ideas, are no part of <pb n="517" id="iv.iv.v-Page_517" />
the truth, which the enlightened mind sees; and therefore ought not to be regarded 
as such.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.iv.v-p110">III. We are led by this subject, more particularly to reflect 
upon the total and very great criminality of moral blindness, which is opposed to 
divine illumination. This has been brought into view, in considering this subject; 
and it is of importance that it should be always remembered, believed and realized 
by every person. Since this darkness consists wholly in the sinful inclinations 
of the heart, it must be wholly sinful. And the greater, the more strong and fixed 
it is, the more criminal it must be. The necessity of divine influence and power, 
in order to remove this darkness, is so far from proving it no crime, that it is 
a demonstrative evidence that it is a very great crime; as it is so strongly fixed 
in the heart. We are, and must be, under obligation to understand and approve all 
that moral truth, of which our natural capacities are capable, and which we have 
opportunity and are under advantage to see. All that blindness and error which is 
contrary to this, and prevents our seeing it, is contrary to our obligation, a violation 
of it; and therefore altogether criminal. There is a great difference between a 
person who has no eyes, and therefore cannot see the light, it being naturally impossible; 
and another who has good eyes, but from an aversion from seeing, shuts them fast, 
and will not open them to admit the light. The former cannot be under obligation 
to see, or blamed for not seeing; the latter may, and it is wholly his own fault, 
that he does not see. The scripture represents moral blindness by this, and says, 
men have eyes, and see not, because they hate the light, and shut their eyes.</p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.iv.v-p111">We are wholly blameable, and have no excuse for all our blindness 
respecting the things of the Spirit of God, and for every error and mistake into 
which we fall, concerning things of a moral nature; and the greater our blindness 
is, and the more gross and numerous are our errors and mistakes in these things, 
and the more clear the light is, which is set before us, the more inexcusable and 
guilty we are. Our Saviour says, “If the light which is in thee, be darkness, how 
great is that darkness!” And we are prepared now to say, if all this great <pb n="518" id="iv.iv.v-Page_518" />
darkness be wholly criminal, and that in proportion to the greatness of it, how 
great is our guilt!</p>
<p class="normal" id="iv.iv.v-p112">IV. How reasonable is it that men should be called upon and commanded 
to open their eyes, and see, in a moral sense! It has been observed, that God does 
so, in the scripture. He says, “O ye simple, understand wisdom, and, ye fools, be 
ye of an understanding heart.”<note n="589" id="iv.iv.v-p112.1"><p class="normal" id="iv.iv.v-p113"><scripRef id="iv.iv.v-p113.1" passage="Prov. viii. 5" parsed="|Prov|8|5|0|0" osisRef="Bible:Prov.8.5">Prov. viii. 5</scripRef>.</p></note> If men be wholly blameable 
for not seeing when God has given them capacity to see, and sets light before them, 
and their blindness be wholly wilful; no reason can be given why they should not 
be exhorted and commanded to do what they ought to do, and can have no excuse for 
not doing it, however fixed and obstinate they are in their blindness, and however 
far they are from a disposition, or moral power or possibility to come to the light, 
from their fixed and strong hatred of it; so that they never will obey, if left 
to themselves. It is of great importance that this should be well understood and 
believed, as it is necessary in order to our understanding the scripture, and our 
own character and blameableness.</p>
<h2 id="iv.iv.v-p113.2">END OF VOL. I.</h2>
</div3></div2></div1>


<div1 title="Indexes" prev="iv.iv.v" next="v.i" id="v">
<h1 id="v-p0.1">Indexes</h1>

<div2 title="Index of Scripture References" prev="v" next="v.ii" id="v.i">
  <h2 id="v.i-p0.1">Index of Scripture References</h2>
  <insertIndex type="scripRef" id="v.i-p0.2" />



<div class="Index">
<p class="bbook">Genesis</p>
 <p class="bref">
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Gen&amp;scrCh=1&amp;scrV=1#iv.ii-p105.1">1:1</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Gen&amp;scrCh=1&amp;scrV=2#iii.iii-p11.1">1:2</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Gen&amp;scrCh=1&amp;scrV=26#iii.vii.ii-p77.1">1:26</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Gen&amp;scrCh=1&amp;scrV=26#iii.iii-p14.1">1:26</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Gen&amp;scrCh=6&amp;scrV=3#iii.iii-p17.1">6:3</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Gen&amp;scrCh=6&amp;scrV=5#iii.viii-p65.1">6:5</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Gen&amp;scrCh=6&amp;scrV=8#iii.iii-p17.1">6:8</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Gen&amp;scrCh=8&amp;scrV=21#iii.viii-p54.1">8:21</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Gen&amp;scrCh=8&amp;scrV=21#iii.viii-p66.1">8:21</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Gen&amp;scrCh=11&amp;scrV=6#iii.iii-p15.1">11:6-7</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Gen&amp;scrCh=49&amp;scrV=3#iv.ii-p165.1">49:3</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Gen&amp;scrCh=50&amp;scrV=20#iii.iv-p244.1">50:20</a> </p>
<p class="bbook">Exodus</p>
 <p class="bref">
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Exod&amp;scrCh=4&amp;scrV=21#iii.iv-p209.1">4:21</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Exod&amp;scrCh=4&amp;scrV=21#iii.iv-p272.1">4:21</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Exod&amp;scrCh=4&amp;scrV=22#iv.ii-p167.1">4:22</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Exod&amp;scrCh=7&amp;scrV=3#iii.iv-p210.1">7:3</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Exod&amp;scrCh=7&amp;scrV=3#iii.iv-p261.4">7:3</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Exod&amp;scrCh=7&amp;scrV=3#iii.iv-p272.2">7:3</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Exod&amp;scrCh=7&amp;scrV=13#iii.iv-p211.1">7:13</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Exod&amp;scrCh=8&amp;scrV=15#iii.iv-p273.1">8:15</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Exod&amp;scrCh=9&amp;scrV=12#iii.iv-p212.1">9:12</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Exod&amp;scrCh=9&amp;scrV=34#iii.iv-p274.1">9:34</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Exod&amp;scrCh=9&amp;scrV=34#iii.iv-p273.2">9:34-35</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Exod&amp;scrCh=10&amp;scrV=1#iii.iv-p213.1">10:1-2</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Exod&amp;scrCh=10&amp;scrV=20#iii.iv-p214.1">10:20</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Exod&amp;scrCh=10&amp;scrV=27#iii.iv-p215.1">10:27</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Exod&amp;scrCh=11&amp;scrV=10#iii.iv-p216.1">11:10</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Exod&amp;scrCh=12&amp;scrV=7#iv.iii-p26.2">12:7</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Exod&amp;scrCh=12&amp;scrV=13#iv.iii-p26.3">12:13</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Exod&amp;scrCh=14&amp;scrV=4#iii.iv-p217.1">14:4</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Exod&amp;scrCh=14&amp;scrV=8#iii.iv-p218.1">14:8</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Exod&amp;scrCh=14&amp;scrV=17#iii.iv-p218.2">14:17</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Exod&amp;scrCh=23&amp;scrV=15#iii.v-p26.1">23:15</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Exod&amp;scrCh=23&amp;scrV=16#iii.v-p26.2">23:16</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Exod&amp;scrCh=28&amp;scrV=43#iv.iii-p30.1">28:43</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Exod&amp;scrCh=33&amp;scrV=18#iv.i-p46.1">33:18-19</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Exod&amp;scrCh=34&amp;scrV=6#iv.i-p46.2">34:6-7</a> </p>
<p class="bbook">Leviticus</p>
 <p class="bref">
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Lev&amp;scrCh=17&amp;scrV=11#iv.iii-p36.1">17:11</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Lev&amp;scrCh=22&amp;scrV=9#iv.iii-p31.1">22:9</a> </p>
<p class="bbook">Numbers</p>
 <p class="bref">
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Num&amp;scrCh=6&amp;scrV=23#iv.ii-p138.1">6:23</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Num&amp;scrCh=6&amp;scrV=24#iv.ii-p138.2">6:24</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Num&amp;scrCh=6&amp;scrV=25#iv.ii-p138.3">6:25</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Num&amp;scrCh=6&amp;scrV=26#iv.ii-p138.4">6:26</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Num&amp;scrCh=18&amp;scrV=22#iv.iii-p32.1">18:22</a> </p>
<p class="bbook">Deuteronomy</p>
 <p class="bref">
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Deut&amp;scrCh=2&amp;scrV=30#iii.iv-p220.1">2:30</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Deut&amp;scrCh=10&amp;scrV=16#iii.iv-p285.1">10:16</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Deut&amp;scrCh=15&amp;scrV=9#iv.iv.v-p50.1">15:9</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Deut&amp;scrCh=18&amp;scrV=15#iv.iii-p147.2">18:15</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Deut&amp;scrCh=19&amp;scrV=16#iii.vii.ii-p14.1">19:16-21</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Deut&amp;scrCh=19&amp;scrV=21#iii.vii.ii-p13.1">19:21</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Deut&amp;scrCh=29&amp;scrV=4#iv.iv.v-p11.1">29:4</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Deut&amp;scrCh=29&amp;scrV=22#iv.iii-p91.1">29:22-28</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Deut&amp;scrCh=30&amp;scrV=6#iii.iv-p284.1">30:6</a> </p>
<p class="bbook">Joshua</p>
 <p class="bref">
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Josh&amp;scrCh=9&amp;scrV=20#iii.iv-p261.5">9:20</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Josh&amp;scrCh=11&amp;scrV=20#iii.iv-p221.1">11:20</a> </p>
<p class="bbook">Judges</p>
 <p class="bref">
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Judg&amp;scrCh=9&amp;scrV=23#iii.iv-p193.1">9:23</a> </p>
<p class="bbook">1 Samuel</p>
 <p class="bref">
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=1Sam&amp;scrCh=2&amp;scrV=25#iii.iv-p147.1">2:25</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=1Sam&amp;scrCh=16&amp;scrV=4#iii.iv-p194.1">16:4</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=1Sam&amp;scrCh=18&amp;scrV=10#iii.iv-p194.2">18:10</a> </p>
<p class="bbook">2 Samuel</p>
 <p class="bref">
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=2Sam&amp;scrCh=17&amp;scrV=14#iii.iv-p151.1">17:14</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=2Sam&amp;scrCh=24&amp;scrV=1#iii.iv-p175.1">24:1</a> </p>
<p class="bbook">1 Kings</p>
 <p class="bref">
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=1Kgs&amp;scrCh=2&amp;scrV=37#iii.viii-p10.1">2:37</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=1Kgs&amp;scrCh=3&amp;scrV=9#iv.iv.v-p26.1">3:9</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=1Kgs&amp;scrCh=3&amp;scrV=12#iv.iv.v-p26.2">3:12</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=1Kgs&amp;scrCh=11&amp;scrV=14#iii.iv-p176.1">11:14</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=1Kgs&amp;scrCh=11&amp;scrV=23#iii.iv-p176.2">11:23</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=1Kgs&amp;scrCh=12&amp;scrV=15#iii.iv-p153.1">12:15</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=1Kgs&amp;scrCh=12&amp;scrV=24#iii.iv-p153.2">12:24</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=1Kgs&amp;scrCh=22&amp;scrV=23#iii.iv-p195.1">22:23</a> </p>
<p class="bbook">2 Kings</p>
 <p class="bref">
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=2Kgs&amp;scrCh=26&amp;scrV=2#iii.iv-p154.1">26:2</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=2Kgs&amp;scrCh=26&amp;scrV=3#iii.iv-p154.2">26:3</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=2Kgs&amp;scrCh=26&amp;scrV=29#iii.iv-p154.3">26:29</a> </p>
<p class="bbook">1 Chronicles</p>
 <p class="bref">
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=1Chr&amp;scrCh=5&amp;scrV=26#iii.iv-p177.1">5:26</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=1Chr&amp;scrCh=23&amp;scrV=13#iv.ii-p138.5">23:13</a> </p>
<p class="bbook">2 Chronicles</p>
 <p class="bref">
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=2Chr&amp;scrCh=1&amp;scrV=10#iv.iv.v-p25.1">1:10</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=2Chr&amp;scrCh=1&amp;scrV=11#iv.iv.v-p25.2">1:11</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=2Chr&amp;scrCh=9&amp;scrV=30#iv.ii-p86.1">9:30</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=2Chr&amp;scrCh=25&amp;scrV=20#iii.iv-p156.1">25:20</a> </p>
<p class="bbook">Job</p>
 <p class="bref">
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Job&amp;scrCh=2&amp;scrV=7#iv.ii-p257.1">2:7</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Job&amp;scrCh=2&amp;scrV=8#iv.ii-p257.2">2:8</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Job&amp;scrCh=2&amp;scrV=9#iv.ii-p257.3">2:9</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Job&amp;scrCh=11&amp;scrV=12#iv.ii-p276.1">11:12</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Job&amp;scrCh=12&amp;scrV=16#iii.iv-p198.1">12:16</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Job&amp;scrCh=23&amp;scrV=13#iii.iv-p11.1">23:13</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Job&amp;scrCh=26&amp;scrV=13#iii.iii-p12.1">26:13</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Job&amp;scrCh=33&amp;scrV=4#iii.iii-p12.2">33:4</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Job&amp;scrCh=37&amp;scrV=19#iv.ii-p258.1">37:19</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Job&amp;scrCh=37&amp;scrV=20#iv.ii-p258.2">37:20</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Job&amp;scrCh=38&amp;scrV=4#iii.v-p4.1">38:4</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Job&amp;scrCh=38&amp;scrV=7#iii.v-p4.2">38:7</a> </p>
<p class="bbook">Psalms</p>
 <p class="bref">
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Ps&amp;scrCh=2&amp;scrV=6#iv.iii-p152.1">2:6</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Ps&amp;scrCh=2&amp;scrV=6#iv.iii-p166.1">2:6</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Ps&amp;scrCh=2&amp;scrV=7#iv.iii-p166.2">2:7</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Ps&amp;scrCh=2&amp;scrV=8#iv.iii-p166.3">2:8</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Ps&amp;scrCh=7&amp;scrV=9#iv.ii-p87.1">7:9</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Ps&amp;scrCh=14&amp;scrV=1#iv.iv.v-p98.1">14:1</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Ps&amp;scrCh=14&amp;scrV=3#iii.ii-p96.1">14:3</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Ps&amp;scrCh=25&amp;scrV=9#iii.iv-p302.1">25:9</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Ps&amp;scrCh=25&amp;scrV=9#iv.ii-p281.1">25:9</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Ps&amp;scrCh=28&amp;scrV=3#iii.iv-p181.1">28:3</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Ps&amp;scrCh=28&amp;scrV=5#iii.i-p60.1">28:5</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Ps&amp;scrCh=33&amp;scrV=6#iv.ii-p105.2">33:6</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Ps&amp;scrCh=33&amp;scrV=11#iii.iv-p10.1">33:11</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Ps&amp;scrCh=40&amp;scrV=6#iv.iii-p27.1">40:6</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Ps&amp;scrCh=40&amp;scrV=6#iv.iii-p169.1">40:6</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Ps&amp;scrCh=40&amp;scrV=7#iv.iii-p27.2">40:7</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Ps&amp;scrCh=40&amp;scrV=7#iv.iii-p169.2">40:7</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Ps&amp;scrCh=40&amp;scrV=8#iv.iii-p27.3">40:8</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Ps&amp;scrCh=40&amp;scrV=8#iv.iii-p169.3">40:8</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Ps&amp;scrCh=45&amp;scrV=1#iv.iii-p153.1">45:1</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Ps&amp;scrCh=45&amp;scrV=6#iv.iii-p170.3">45:6-7</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Ps&amp;scrCh=45&amp;scrV=7#iv.iii-p18.2">45:7</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Ps&amp;scrCh=45&amp;scrV=11#iv.ii-p131.1">45:11</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Ps&amp;scrCh=51&amp;scrV=1#iii.viii-p85.1">51:1-19</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Ps&amp;scrCh=51&amp;scrV=5#iii.viii-p55.1">51:5</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Ps&amp;scrCh=51&amp;scrV=10#iii.iv-p284.2">51:10</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Ps&amp;scrCh=58&amp;scrV=3#iii.viii-p56.1">58:3</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Ps&amp;scrCh=62&amp;scrV=5#iv.ii-p222.4">62:5</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Ps&amp;scrCh=67&amp;scrV=8#iv.iii-p66.1">67:8</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Ps&amp;scrCh=68&amp;scrV=3#iii.iv-p320.1">68:3</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Ps&amp;scrCh=76&amp;scrV=10#iv.iii-p154.1">76:10</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Ps&amp;scrCh=81&amp;scrV=12#iii.vii.ii-p53.1">81:12</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Ps&amp;scrCh=85&amp;scrV=10#iv.iii-p104.1">85:10</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Ps&amp;scrCh=89&amp;scrV=2#iv.i-p45.1">89:2</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Ps&amp;scrCh=89&amp;scrV=16#iv.ii-p170.1">89:16</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Ps&amp;scrCh=89&amp;scrV=19#iv.iii-p102.4">89:19-20</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Ps&amp;scrCh=89&amp;scrV=27#iv.ii-p169.1">89:27</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Ps&amp;scrCh=95&amp;scrV=10#iv.iv.v-p16.2">95:10</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Ps&amp;scrCh=102&amp;scrV=25#iv.ii-p104.1">102:25</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Ps&amp;scrCh=104&amp;scrV=24#iii.iv-p7.1">104:24</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Ps&amp;scrCh=105&amp;scrV=25#iii.iv-p185.1">105:25</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Ps&amp;scrCh=107&amp;scrV=1#iv.i-p73.1">107:1</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Ps&amp;scrCh=107&amp;scrV=2#iv.i-p73.2">107:2</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Ps&amp;scrCh=107&amp;scrV=17#iii.iv-p145.1">107:17</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Ps&amp;scrCh=110&amp;scrV=1#iv.iii-p167.1">110:1</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Ps&amp;scrCh=110&amp;scrV=2#iv.iii-p167.2">110:2</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Ps&amp;scrCh=119&amp;scrV=18#iv.iv.v-p90.1">119:18</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Ps&amp;scrCh=119&amp;scrV=34#iv.iv.v-p29.1">119:34</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Ps&amp;scrCh=119&amp;scrV=36#iii.iv-p186.1">119:36</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Ps&amp;scrCh=119&amp;scrV=144#iv.iv.v-p29.2">119:144</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Ps&amp;scrCh=141&amp;scrV=4#iii.iv-p187.1">141:4</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Ps&amp;scrCh=146&amp;scrV=3#iv.ii-p222.2">146:3</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Ps&amp;scrCh=146&amp;scrV=5#iv.ii-p222.3">146:5</a> </p>
<p class="bbook">Proverbs</p>
 <p class="bref">
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Prov&amp;scrCh=2&amp;scrV=2#iii.ii-p50.1">2:2</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Prov&amp;scrCh=2&amp;scrV=5#iii.ii-p50.2">2:5</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Prov&amp;scrCh=2&amp;scrV=6#iii.ii-p50.3">2:6</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Prov&amp;scrCh=4&amp;scrV=19#iv.iv.v-p3.1">4:19</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Prov&amp;scrCh=8&amp;scrV=5#iv.iv.v-p113.1">8:5</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Prov&amp;scrCh=16&amp;scrV=4#iii.iv-p26.1">16:4</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Prov&amp;scrCh=16&amp;scrV=4#iii.iv-p226.1">16:4</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Prov&amp;scrCh=18&amp;scrV=5#iii.i-p61.1">18:5</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Prov&amp;scrCh=21&amp;scrV=1#iii.iv-p189.1">21:1</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Prov&amp;scrCh=22&amp;scrV=9#iv.iv.v-p54.1">22:9</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Prov&amp;scrCh=23&amp;scrV=6#iv.iv.v-p51.1">23:6</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Prov&amp;scrCh=23&amp;scrV=7#iv.iv.v-p51.2">23:7</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Prov&amp;scrCh=28&amp;scrV=5#iv.iv.v-p70.1">28:5</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Prov&amp;scrCh=28&amp;scrV=22#iv.iv.v-p52.1">28:22</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Prov&amp;scrCh=30&amp;scrV=4#iv.ii-p220.1">30:4</a> </p>
<p class="bbook">Ecclesiastes</p>
 <p class="bref">
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Eccl&amp;scrCh=9&amp;scrV=3#iii.viii-p67.1">9:3</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Eccl&amp;scrCh=12&amp;scrV=0#iii.iii-p8.1">12</a> </p>
<p class="bbook">Song of Solomon</p>
 <p class="bref">
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Song&amp;scrCh=6&amp;scrV=9#iv.ii-p59.1">6:9</a> </p>
<p class="bbook">Isaiah</p>
 <p class="bref">
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Isa&amp;scrCh=5&amp;scrV=20#iv.iv.iv-p40.1">5:20</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Isa&amp;scrCh=5&amp;scrV=20#iv.iv.v-p72.1">5:20</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Isa&amp;scrCh=6&amp;scrV=1#iv.ii-p133.1">6:1</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Isa&amp;scrCh=6&amp;scrV=2#iv.ii-p133.2">6:2</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Isa&amp;scrCh=6&amp;scrV=5#iv.ii-p33.1">6:5</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Isa&amp;scrCh=6&amp;scrV=9#iii.iv-p204.1">6:9</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Isa&amp;scrCh=6&amp;scrV=10#iii.iv-p204.2">6:10</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Isa&amp;scrCh=7&amp;scrV=14#iv.ii-p242.1">7:14</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Isa&amp;scrCh=7&amp;scrV=14#iv.ii-p23.2">7:14</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Isa&amp;scrCh=8&amp;scrV=13#iv.ii-p61.1">8:13</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Isa&amp;scrCh=8&amp;scrV=14#iv.ii-p61.2">8:14</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Isa&amp;scrCh=9&amp;scrV=6#iv.ii-p242.2">9:6</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Isa&amp;scrCh=9&amp;scrV=6#iv.ii-p21.1">9:6</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Isa&amp;scrCh=10&amp;scrV=15#iii.iv-p297.1">10:15</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Isa&amp;scrCh=10&amp;scrV=19#iv.iii-p146.2">10:19</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Isa&amp;scrCh=13&amp;scrV=17#iii.iv-p178.1">13:17</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Isa&amp;scrCh=19&amp;scrV=14#iii.iv-p196.1">19:14</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Isa&amp;scrCh=26&amp;scrV=7#iii.ii-p72.1">26:7</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Isa&amp;scrCh=29&amp;scrV=10#iii.iv-p206.1">29:10</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Isa&amp;scrCh=42&amp;scrV=1#iv.iii-p168.1">42:1</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Isa&amp;scrCh=42&amp;scrV=6#iv.iii-p168.2">42:6</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Isa&amp;scrCh=42&amp;scrV=18#iv.iv.v-p20.1">42:18</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Isa&amp;scrCh=42&amp;scrV=21#iv.iii-p15.1">42:21</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Isa&amp;scrCh=43&amp;scrV=8#iii.ii-p59.1">43:8</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Isa&amp;scrCh=43&amp;scrV=11#iv.ii-p41.1">43:11</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Isa&amp;scrCh=44&amp;scrV=6#iv.ii-p36.1">44:6</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Isa&amp;scrCh=44&amp;scrV=9#iv.iv.v-p12.1">44:9-18</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Isa&amp;scrCh=44&amp;scrV=15#iii.iv-p206.2">44:15</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Isa&amp;scrCh=44&amp;scrV=19#iv.iv.v-p12.1">44:19</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Isa&amp;scrCh=44&amp;scrV=20#iv.iv.v-p12.1">44:20</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Isa&amp;scrCh=45&amp;scrV=5#iii.iv-p228.1">45:5</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Isa&amp;scrCh=45&amp;scrV=5#iii.iv-p230.1">45:5</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Isa&amp;scrCh=45&amp;scrV=6#iii.iv-p228.2">45:6</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Isa&amp;scrCh=45&amp;scrV=6#iii.iv-p230.2">45:6</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Isa&amp;scrCh=45&amp;scrV=7#iii.iv-p228.3">45:7</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Isa&amp;scrCh=45&amp;scrV=7#iii.iv-p230.3">45:7</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Isa&amp;scrCh=45&amp;scrV=22#iv.ii-p120.1">45:22</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Isa&amp;scrCh=45&amp;scrV=23#iv.ii-p120.2">45:23</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Isa&amp;scrCh=45&amp;scrV=24#iv.ii-p288.1">45:24</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Isa&amp;scrCh=45&amp;scrV=25#iv.ii-p288.2">45:25</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Isa&amp;scrCh=48&amp;scrV=3#iii.i-p30.1">48:3</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Isa&amp;scrCh=48&amp;scrV=4#iii.i-p30.2">48:4</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Isa&amp;scrCh=48&amp;scrV=5#iii.i-p30.3">48:5</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Isa&amp;scrCh=48&amp;scrV=9#iii.ii-p60.1">48:9</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Isa&amp;scrCh=48&amp;scrV=11#iii.ii-p60.2">48:11</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Isa&amp;scrCh=53&amp;scrV=1#iv.iii-p29.1">53:1-12</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Isa&amp;scrCh=54&amp;scrV=5#iv.ii-p52.1">54:5</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Isa&amp;scrCh=62&amp;scrV=0#iv.ii-p53.1">62</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Isa&amp;scrCh=63&amp;scrV=17#iii.iv-p199.1">63:17</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Isa&amp;scrCh=63&amp;scrV=17#iii.iv-p222.1">63:17</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Isa&amp;scrCh=65&amp;scrV=17#iv.i-p56.1">65:17</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Isa&amp;scrCh=65&amp;scrV=17#iii.v-p12.1">65:17-18</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Isa&amp;scrCh=65&amp;scrV=18#iv.i-p56.2">65:18</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Isa&amp;scrCh=161&amp;scrV=0#iii.iv-p285.8">161</a> </p>
<p class="bbook">Jeremiah</p>
 <p class="bref">
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Jer&amp;scrCh=17&amp;scrV=5#iv.ii-p222.5">17:5</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Jer&amp;scrCh=17&amp;scrV=7#iv.ii-p222.6">17:7</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Jer&amp;scrCh=17&amp;scrV=9#iii.viii-p68.1">17:9</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Jer&amp;scrCh=17&amp;scrV=10#iv.ii-p88.1">17:10</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Jer&amp;scrCh=23&amp;scrV=6#iv.ii-p22.1">23:6</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Jer&amp;scrCh=24&amp;scrV=7#iv.iv.v-p27.1">24:7</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Jer&amp;scrCh=24&amp;scrV=7#iv.iv.v-p83.1">24:7</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Jer&amp;scrCh=25&amp;scrV=9#iii.iv-p159.1">25:9</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Jer&amp;scrCh=31&amp;scrV=9#iv.ii-p168.1">31:9</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Jer&amp;scrCh=31&amp;scrV=20#iv.ii-p168.2">31:20</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Jer&amp;scrCh=51&amp;scrV=20#iii.iv-p159.2">51:20</a> </p>
<p class="bbook">Ezekiel</p>
 <p class="bref">
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Ezek&amp;scrCh=3&amp;scrV=1#iii.vii.ii-p32.1">3:1-27</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Ezek&amp;scrCh=14&amp;scrV=9#iii.iv-p200.1">14:9</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Ezek&amp;scrCh=18&amp;scrV=1#iii.vii.ii-p32.2">18:1-32</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Ezek&amp;scrCh=18&amp;scrV=31#iii.iv-p285.2">18:31</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Ezek&amp;scrCh=20&amp;scrV=25#iii.iv-p165.1">20:25</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Ezek&amp;scrCh=20&amp;scrV=26#iii.iv-p165.2">20:26</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Ezek&amp;scrCh=33&amp;scrV=1#iii.vii.ii-p32.3">33:1-33</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Ezek&amp;scrCh=33&amp;scrV=12#iii.viii-p9.1">33:12</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Ezek&amp;scrCh=33&amp;scrV=13#iii.viii-p9.2">33:13</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Ezek&amp;scrCh=36&amp;scrV=26#iv.iv.iii-p8.1">36:26</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Ezek&amp;scrCh=36&amp;scrV=26#iv.iv.v-p84.1">36:26</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Ezek&amp;scrCh=36&amp;scrV=26#iii.iv-p284.3">36:26-27</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Ezek&amp;scrCh=36&amp;scrV=27#iv.iv.iii-p8.2">36:27</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Ezek&amp;scrCh=39&amp;scrV=25#iii.ii-p58.1">39:25</a> </p>
<p class="bbook">Daniel</p>
 <p class="bref">
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Dan&amp;scrCh=3&amp;scrV=25#iv.ii-p219.1">3:25</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Dan&amp;scrCh=9&amp;scrV=24#iv.iii-p17.1">9:24</a> </p>
<p class="bbook">Micah</p>
 <p class="bref">
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Mic&amp;scrCh=5&amp;scrV=2#iv.ii-p67.1">5:2</a> </p>
<p class="bbook">Nahum</p>
 <p class="bref">
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Nah&amp;scrCh=1&amp;scrV=3#iii.ii-p61.1">1:3</a> </p>
<p class="bbook">Zechariah</p>
 <p class="bref">
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Zech&amp;scrCh=6&amp;scrV=12#iv.iii-p150.1">6:12</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Zech&amp;scrCh=6&amp;scrV=13#iv.iii-p150.2">6:13</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Zech&amp;scrCh=8&amp;scrV=10#iii.iv-p163.1">8:10</a> </p>
<p class="bbook">Malachi</p>
 <p class="bref">
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Mal&amp;scrCh=4&amp;scrV=4#iii.i-p14.1">4:4</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Mal&amp;scrCh=4&amp;scrV=5#iii.i-p14.2">4:5</a> </p>
<p class="bbook">Matthew</p>
 <p class="bref">
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Matt&amp;scrCh=1&amp;scrV=18#iv.ii-p271.1">1:18</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Matt&amp;scrCh=1&amp;scrV=20#iv.ii-p271.2">1:20</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Matt&amp;scrCh=1&amp;scrV=21#iv.ii-p42.1">1:21</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Matt&amp;scrCh=1&amp;scrV=23#iv.ii-p23.1">1:23</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Matt&amp;scrCh=2&amp;scrV=6#iv.ii-p68.1">2:6</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Matt&amp;scrCh=4&amp;scrV=10#iv.ii-p130.1">4:10</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Matt&amp;scrCh=5&amp;scrV=8#iv.iv.v-p37.1">5:8</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Matt&amp;scrCh=5&amp;scrV=17#iv.iii-p16.1">5:17</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Matt&amp;scrCh=5&amp;scrV=18#iv.iii-p16.2">5:18</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Matt&amp;scrCh=5&amp;scrV=43#iv.iv.iv-p23.1">5:43</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Matt&amp;scrCh=6&amp;scrV=22#iv.iv.ii-p12.1">6:22</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Matt&amp;scrCh=6&amp;scrV=22#iv.iv.v-p46.1">6:22</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Matt&amp;scrCh=6&amp;scrV=23#iv.iv.ii-p12.2">6:23</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Matt&amp;scrCh=6&amp;scrV=23#iv.iv.v-p46.2">6:23</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Matt&amp;scrCh=11&amp;scrV=27#iv.ii-p89.1">11:27</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Matt&amp;scrCh=11&amp;scrV=27#iv.ii-p198.1">11:27</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Matt&amp;scrCh=12&amp;scrV=33#iv.iv.ii-p6.1">12:33</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Matt&amp;scrCh=12&amp;scrV=35#iv.iv.ii-p6.2">12:35</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Matt&amp;scrCh=13&amp;scrV=15#iii.iv-p281.4">13:15</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Matt&amp;scrCh=13&amp;scrV=31#iv.i-p52.1">13:31</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Matt&amp;scrCh=13&amp;scrV=32#iv.i-p52.2">13:32</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Matt&amp;scrCh=13&amp;scrV=33#iv.i-p52.3">13:33</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Matt&amp;scrCh=14&amp;scrV=33#iv.ii-p209.1">14:33</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Matt&amp;scrCh=16&amp;scrV=16#iv.ii-p200.2">16:16</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Matt&amp;scrCh=16&amp;scrV=16#iv.ii-p202.1">16:16</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Matt&amp;scrCh=16&amp;scrV=17#iv.ii-p202.2">16:17</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Matt&amp;scrCh=16&amp;scrV=17#iv.iv.v-p87.1">16:17</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Matt&amp;scrCh=16&amp;scrV=24#iv.iv.iv-p25.1">16:24</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Matt&amp;scrCh=18&amp;scrV=20#iv.ii-p81.1">18:20</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Matt&amp;scrCh=20&amp;scrV=15#iv.iv.v-p49.1">20:15</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Matt&amp;scrCh=20&amp;scrV=28#iv.iii-p44.1">20:28</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Matt&amp;scrCh=22&amp;scrV=37#iii.vii.ii-p7.1">22:37</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Matt&amp;scrCh=22&amp;scrV=37#iv.iv.iv-p30.1">22:37</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Matt&amp;scrCh=22&amp;scrV=37#iii.viii-p107.1">22:37-40</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Matt&amp;scrCh=22&amp;scrV=39#iv.iv.iv-p30.3">22:39</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Matt&amp;scrCh=22&amp;scrV=40#iii.vii.ii-p7.2">22:40</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Matt&amp;scrCh=22&amp;scrV=40#iv.iv.iv-p30.4">22:40</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Matt&amp;scrCh=22&amp;scrV=58#iv.iv.iv-p30.2">22:58</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Matt&amp;scrCh=25&amp;scrV=31#iv.iii-p157.1">25:31-46</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Matt&amp;scrCh=25&amp;scrV=41#iv.i-p12.1">25:41</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Matt&amp;scrCh=26&amp;scrV=28#iv.iii-p37.1">26:28</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Matt&amp;scrCh=26&amp;scrV=53#iii.iv-p167.1">26:53</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Matt&amp;scrCh=26&amp;scrV=54#iii.iv-p167.2">26:54</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Matt&amp;scrCh=26&amp;scrV=56#iii.iv-p167.3">26:56</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Matt&amp;scrCh=26&amp;scrV=64#iv.ii-p215.1">26:64</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Matt&amp;scrCh=26&amp;scrV=65#iv.ii-p215.2">26:65</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Matt&amp;scrCh=26&amp;scrV=66#iv.ii-p215.3">26:66</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Matt&amp;scrCh=27&amp;scrV=54#iv.ii-p217.1">27:54</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Matt&amp;scrCh=28&amp;scrV=18#iv.ii-p75.1">28:18</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Matt&amp;scrCh=28&amp;scrV=19#iii.iii-p5.1">28:19</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Matt&amp;scrCh=28&amp;scrV=19#iv.ii-p136.1">28:19</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Matt&amp;scrCh=28&amp;scrV=20#iv.ii-p81.2">28:20</a> </p>
<p class="bbook">Mark</p>
 <p class="bref">
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Mark&amp;scrCh=4&amp;scrV=26#iv.i-p53.1">4:26-39</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Mark&amp;scrCh=7&amp;scrV=21#iv.iv.ii-p13.1">7:21</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Mark&amp;scrCh=7&amp;scrV=21#iv.iv.v-p47.1">7:21</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Mark&amp;scrCh=7&amp;scrV=22#iv.iv.ii-p13.2">7:22</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Mark&amp;scrCh=7&amp;scrV=22#iv.iv.v-p47.2">7:22</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Mark&amp;scrCh=7&amp;scrV=23#iv.iv.ii-p13.3">7:23</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Mark&amp;scrCh=7&amp;scrV=23#iv.iv.v-p47.3">7:23</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Mark&amp;scrCh=9&amp;scrV=41#iii.viii-p70.1">9:41</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Mark&amp;scrCh=16&amp;scrV=15#iv.iv.i-p5.1">16:15</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Mark&amp;scrCh=16&amp;scrV=16#iv.iv.i-p5.2">16:16</a> </p>
<p class="bbook">Luke</p>
 <p class="bref">
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Luke&amp;scrCh=1&amp;scrV=31#iv.ii-p180.1">1:31</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Luke&amp;scrCh=1&amp;scrV=32#iv.ii-p206.1">1:32</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Luke&amp;scrCh=1&amp;scrV=32#iv.iii-p158.1">1:32</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Luke&amp;scrCh=1&amp;scrV=33#iv.iii-p158.2">1:33</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Luke&amp;scrCh=1&amp;scrV=35#iv.ii-p206.2">1:35</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Luke&amp;scrCh=1&amp;scrV=36#iv.ii-p180.2">1:36</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Luke&amp;scrCh=1&amp;scrV=45#iv.ii-p45.1">1:45</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Luke&amp;scrCh=1&amp;scrV=47#iv.ii-p45.2">1:47</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Luke&amp;scrCh=2&amp;scrV=11#iv.ii-p45.3">2:11</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Luke&amp;scrCh=2&amp;scrV=14#iv.i-p66.1">2:14</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Luke&amp;scrCh=2&amp;scrV=52#iv.ii-p150.1">2:52</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Luke&amp;scrCh=6&amp;scrV=32#iv.iv.iv-p43.1">6:32</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Luke&amp;scrCh=6&amp;scrV=32#iv.iv.iv-p49.1">6:32</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Luke&amp;scrCh=22&amp;scrV=21#iii.iv-p168.1">22:21</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Luke&amp;scrCh=22&amp;scrV=22#iii.iv-p168.2">22:22</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Luke&amp;scrCh=24&amp;scrV=49#iv.iii-p172.1">24:49</a> </p>
<p class="bbook">John</p>
 <p class="bref">
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=John&amp;scrCh=1&amp;scrV=1#iii.iii-p9.1">1:1</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=John&amp;scrCh=1&amp;scrV=1#iv.ii-p18.1">1:1</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=John&amp;scrCh=1&amp;scrV=3#iii.iii-p9.2">1:3</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=John&amp;scrCh=1&amp;scrV=3#iv.ii-p100.1">1:3</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=John&amp;scrCh=1&amp;scrV=5#iv.iii-p141.3">1:5</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=John&amp;scrCh=1&amp;scrV=13#iii.iii-p26.1">1:13</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=John&amp;scrCh=1&amp;scrV=14#iv.ii-p18.2">1:14</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=John&amp;scrCh=1&amp;scrV=18#iv.ii-p197.1">1:18</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=John&amp;scrCh=1&amp;scrV=18#iv.ii-p198.2">1:18</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=John&amp;scrCh=1&amp;scrV=18#iv.ii-p233.1">1:18</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=John&amp;scrCh=1&amp;scrV=49#iv.ii-p207.1">1:49</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=John&amp;scrCh=2&amp;scrV=24#iv.ii-p84.1">2:24</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=John&amp;scrCh=2&amp;scrV=25#iv.ii-p84.2">2:25</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=John&amp;scrCh=3&amp;scrV=3#iii.viii-p72.1">3:3</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=John&amp;scrCh=3&amp;scrV=3#iv.iv.v-p82.1">3:3</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=John&amp;scrCh=3&amp;scrV=5#iii.iii-p24.1">3:5</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=John&amp;scrCh=3&amp;scrV=5#iv.iv.v-p82.2">3:5</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=John&amp;scrCh=3&amp;scrV=6#iii.iii-p24.2">3:6</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=John&amp;scrCh=3&amp;scrV=6#iii.viii-p57.1">3:6</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=John&amp;scrCh=3&amp;scrV=8#iv.iv.ii-p22.1">3:8</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=John&amp;scrCh=3&amp;scrV=13#iv.ii-p82.1">3:13</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=John&amp;scrCh=3&amp;scrV=13#iv.ii-p148.1">3:13</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=John&amp;scrCh=3&amp;scrV=16#iv.i-p22.1">3:16</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=John&amp;scrCh=3&amp;scrV=16#iv.i-p35.1">3:16</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=John&amp;scrCh=3&amp;scrV=16#iv.ii-p230.1">3:16</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=John&amp;scrCh=3&amp;scrV=16#iv.iv.i-p4.1">3:16</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=John&amp;scrCh=3&amp;scrV=18#iv.iv.v-p23.1">3:18</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=John&amp;scrCh=3&amp;scrV=19#iv.iv.v-p23.2">3:19</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=John&amp;scrCh=3&amp;scrV=20#iii.i-p65.1">3:20</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=John&amp;scrCh=3&amp;scrV=20#iv.iv.v-p23.3">3:20</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=John&amp;scrCh=3&amp;scrV=20#iv.iv.v-p64.1">3:20</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=John&amp;scrCh=3&amp;scrV=21#iii.i-p65.2">3:21</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=John&amp;scrCh=3&amp;scrV=21#iv.iv.v-p64.2">3:21</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=John&amp;scrCh=3&amp;scrV=29#iv.ii-p54.1">3:29</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=John&amp;scrCh=3&amp;scrV=34#iv.ii-p157.1">3:34</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=John&amp;scrCh=3&amp;scrV=35#iv.ii-p303.1">3:35</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=John&amp;scrCh=3&amp;scrV=36#iv.ii-p203.1">3:36</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=John&amp;scrCh=5&amp;scrV=15#iv.iii-p67.1">5:15</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=John&amp;scrCh=5&amp;scrV=17#iv.ii-p94.1">5:17</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=John&amp;scrCh=5&amp;scrV=17#iv.ii-p99.1">5:17</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=John&amp;scrCh=5&amp;scrV=17#iv.ii-p212.1">5:17-18</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=John&amp;scrCh=5&amp;scrV=18#iv.iii-p67.2">5:18</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=John&amp;scrCh=5&amp;scrV=19#iv.ii-p302.1">5:19</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=John&amp;scrCh=5&amp;scrV=19#iv.ii-p99.2">5:19</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=John&amp;scrCh=5&amp;scrV=23#iv.ii-p115.1">5:23</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=John&amp;scrCh=5&amp;scrV=26#iv.ii-p107.2">5:26</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=John&amp;scrCh=5&amp;scrV=29#iv.ii-p107.1">5:29</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=John&amp;scrCh=5&amp;scrV=30#iv.iv.iv-p17.1">5:30</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=John&amp;scrCh=5&amp;scrV=44#iv.iv.v-p44.1">5:44</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=John&amp;scrCh=6&amp;scrV=27#iv.iii-p171.1">6:27</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=John&amp;scrCh=6&amp;scrV=37#iv.iii-p138.1">6:37</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=John&amp;scrCh=6&amp;scrV=38#iv.iii-p171.2">6:38</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=John&amp;scrCh=6&amp;scrV=38#iv.iv.iv-p17.2">6:38</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=John&amp;scrCh=6&amp;scrV=39#iv.iii-p138.2">6:39</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=John&amp;scrCh=6&amp;scrV=39#iv.iii-p171.3">6:39</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=John&amp;scrCh=6&amp;scrV=40#iv.ii-p107.3">6:40</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=John&amp;scrCh=6&amp;scrV=40#iv.iii-p138.3">6:40</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=John&amp;scrCh=6&amp;scrV=45#iv.iv.v-p86.1">6:45</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=John&amp;scrCh=6&amp;scrV=50#iii.vii.ii-p33.1">6:50</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=John&amp;scrCh=6&amp;scrV=53#iv.iv.i-p12.1">6:53</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=John&amp;scrCh=6&amp;scrV=54#iv.iv.i-p12.2">6:54</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=John&amp;scrCh=6&amp;scrV=69#iv.ii-p200.1">6:69</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=John&amp;scrCh=7&amp;scrV=17#iii.i-p64.1">7:17</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=John&amp;scrCh=7&amp;scrV=17#iv.iv.v-p65.1">7:17</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=John&amp;scrCh=8&amp;scrV=12#iv.iii-p141.1">8:12</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=John&amp;scrCh=8&amp;scrV=12#iv.iii-p141.5">8:12</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=John&amp;scrCh=8&amp;scrV=12#iv.iv.v-p80.1">8:12</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=John&amp;scrCh=8&amp;scrV=24#iv.ii-p9.1">8:24</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=John&amp;scrCh=8&amp;scrV=41#iii.viii-p114.1">8:41</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=John&amp;scrCh=8&amp;scrV=51#iii.vii.ii-p33.2">8:51</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=John&amp;scrCh=9&amp;scrV=35#iv.ii-p208.1">9:35</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=John&amp;scrCh=9&amp;scrV=38#iv.ii-p208.2">9:38</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=John&amp;scrCh=10&amp;scrV=10#iv.iii-p122.1">10:10</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=John&amp;scrCh=10&amp;scrV=18#iv.iii-p20.1">10:18</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=John&amp;scrCh=10&amp;scrV=30#iv.ii-p302.2">10:30</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=John&amp;scrCh=10&amp;scrV=30#iv.ii-p92.1">10:30</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=John&amp;scrCh=10&amp;scrV=30#iv.ii-p214.1">10:30</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=John&amp;scrCh=10&amp;scrV=33#iv.ii-p93.1">10:33</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=John&amp;scrCh=10&amp;scrV=33#iv.ii-p214.2">10:33</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=John&amp;scrCh=10&amp;scrV=36#iv.ii-p214.3">10:36</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=John&amp;scrCh=11&amp;scrV=25#iv.ii-p107.4">11:25</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=John&amp;scrCh=11&amp;scrV=26#iii.vii.ii-p33.3">11:26</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=John&amp;scrCh=12&amp;scrV=40#iv.iv.v-p16.1">12:40</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=John&amp;scrCh=12&amp;scrV=41#iii.iii-p19.1">12:41</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=John&amp;scrCh=12&amp;scrV=41#iv.ii-p34.1">12:41</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=John&amp;scrCh=12&amp;scrV=46#iv.iii-p141.2">12:46</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=John&amp;scrCh=13&amp;scrV=37#iv.ii-p133.3">13:37-41</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=John&amp;scrCh=14&amp;scrV=9#iv.ii-p4.1">14:9</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=John&amp;scrCh=14&amp;scrV=9#iv.ii-p199.1">14:9</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=John&amp;scrCh=14&amp;scrV=13#iv.ii-p304.1">14:13</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=John&amp;scrCh=14&amp;scrV=14#iv.ii-p304.2">14:14</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=John&amp;scrCh=14&amp;scrV=16#iii.viii-p71.1">14:16</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=John&amp;scrCh=14&amp;scrV=16#iv.i-p39.1">14:16</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=John&amp;scrCh=14&amp;scrV=17#iii.viii-p71.2">14:17</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=John&amp;scrCh=14&amp;scrV=17#iv.i-p39.2">14:17</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=John&amp;scrCh=14&amp;scrV=26#iv.iii-p125.1">14:26</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=John&amp;scrCh=14&amp;scrV=28#iv.ii-p96.1">14:28</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=John&amp;scrCh=14&amp;scrV=28#iv.iii-p175.1">14:28</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=John&amp;scrCh=15&amp;scrV=5#iv.iv.i-p13.1">15:5</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=John&amp;scrCh=15&amp;scrV=26#iv.iii-p125.2">15:26</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=John&amp;scrCh=16&amp;scrV=7#iv.iii-p125.3">16:7-8</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=John&amp;scrCh=16&amp;scrV=8#iv.i-p81.1">16:8</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=John&amp;scrCh=16&amp;scrV=8#iv.i-p85.1">16:8</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=John&amp;scrCh=16&amp;scrV=9#iv.i-p81.2">16:9</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=John&amp;scrCh=16&amp;scrV=9#iv.i-p85.2">16:9</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=John&amp;scrCh=16&amp;scrV=15#iv.ii-p95.1">16:15</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=John&amp;scrCh=16&amp;scrV=19#iv.ii-p303.2">16:19</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=John&amp;scrCh=16&amp;scrV=28#iv.ii-p298.1">16:28</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=John&amp;scrCh=17&amp;scrV=3#iv.ii-p2.1">17:3</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=John&amp;scrCh=17&amp;scrV=3#iv.iv.v-p28.1">17:3</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=John&amp;scrCh=17&amp;scrV=3#iv.iv.v-p80.2">17:3</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=John&amp;scrCh=17&amp;scrV=26#iv.iv.i-p16.1">17:26</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=John&amp;scrCh=19&amp;scrV=7#iv.ii-p216.1">19:7</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=John&amp;scrCh=19&amp;scrV=8#iv.ii-p216.2">19:8</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=John&amp;scrCh=20&amp;scrV=28#iv.ii-p24.1">20:28</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=John&amp;scrCh=21&amp;scrV=17#iv.ii-p83.1">21:17</a> </p>
<p class="bbook">Acts</p>
 <p class="bref">
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Acts&amp;scrCh=1&amp;scrV=4#iv.iii-p172.2">1:4</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Acts&amp;scrCh=2&amp;scrV=23#iii.iv-p17.1">2:23</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Acts&amp;scrCh=2&amp;scrV=23#iii.iv-p169.1">2:23</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Acts&amp;scrCh=3&amp;scrV=17#iii.iv-p169.2">3:17-18</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Acts&amp;scrCh=3&amp;scrV=22#iv.iii-p147.1">3:22</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Acts&amp;scrCh=4&amp;scrV=27#iii.iv-p171.1">4:27</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Acts&amp;scrCh=4&amp;scrV=28#iii.iv-p171.2">4:28</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Acts&amp;scrCh=5&amp;scrV=3#iii.iii-p28.1">5:3</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Acts&amp;scrCh=5&amp;scrV=4#iii.iii-p28.2">5:4</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Acts&amp;scrCh=7&amp;scrV=59#iv.ii-p122.1">7:59</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Acts&amp;scrCh=8&amp;scrV=37#iv.ii-p201.1">8:37</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Acts&amp;scrCh=9&amp;scrV=14#iv.ii-p125.1">9:14</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Acts&amp;scrCh=9&amp;scrV=20#iv.ii-p126.1">9:20-21</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Acts&amp;scrCh=10&amp;scrV=26#iv.ii-p128.1">10:26</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Acts&amp;scrCh=13&amp;scrV=27#iv.ii-p8.1">13:27</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Acts&amp;scrCh=13&amp;scrV=33#iv.ii-p239.1">13:33</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Acts&amp;scrCh=13&amp;scrV=38#iv.iii-p132.1">13:38</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Acts&amp;scrCh=13&amp;scrV=39#iv.iii-p132.2">13:39</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Acts&amp;scrCh=14&amp;scrV=16#iv.i-p6.1">14:16</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Acts&amp;scrCh=14&amp;scrV=17#iv.i-p6.2">14:17</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Acts&amp;scrCh=17&amp;scrV=26#iv.i-p8.1">17:26</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Acts&amp;scrCh=17&amp;scrV=27#iv.i-p8.2">17:27</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Acts&amp;scrCh=17&amp;scrV=28#iii.iv-p298.1">17:28</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Acts&amp;scrCh=20&amp;scrV=28#iv.ii-p149.1">20:28</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Acts&amp;scrCh=26&amp;scrV=18#iv.iv.v-p8.1">26:18</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Acts&amp;scrCh=27&amp;scrV=0#iii.iv-p52.1">27</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Acts&amp;scrCh=28&amp;scrV=25#iii.iii-p20.1">28:25</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Acts&amp;scrCh=28&amp;scrV=25#iii.iv-p281.1">28:25</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Acts&amp;scrCh=28&amp;scrV=26#iii.iv-p281.2">28:26</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Acts&amp;scrCh=28&amp;scrV=27#iii.iv-p281.3">28:27</a> </p>
<p class="bbook">Romans</p>
 <p class="bref">
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Rom&amp;scrCh=1&amp;scrV=4#iv.ii-p240.1">1:4</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Rom&amp;scrCh=1&amp;scrV=26#iii.vii.ii-p53.2">1:26</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Rom&amp;scrCh=1&amp;scrV=32#iii.vii.ii-p54.1">1:32</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Rom&amp;scrCh=3&amp;scrV=9#iii.ii-p96.2">3:9</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Rom&amp;scrCh=3&amp;scrV=9#iii.viii-p33.1">3:9</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Rom&amp;scrCh=3&amp;scrV=9#iv.iv.ii-p7.1">3:9</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Rom&amp;scrCh=3&amp;scrV=10#iii.viii-p69.1">3:10</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Rom&amp;scrCh=3&amp;scrV=12#iii.ii-p96.2">3:12</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Rom&amp;scrCh=3&amp;scrV=20#iv.i-p41.1">3:20</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Rom&amp;scrCh=3&amp;scrV=25#iv.iii-p13.1">3:25</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Rom&amp;scrCh=3&amp;scrV=26#iv.iii-p13.2">3:26</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Rom&amp;scrCh=4&amp;scrV=4#iv.i-p41.2">4:4-5</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Rom&amp;scrCh=4&amp;scrV=16#iv.i-p41.2">4:16</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Rom&amp;scrCh=5&amp;scrV=6#iv.iii-p47.1">5:6</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Rom&amp;scrCh=5&amp;scrV=7#iv.i-p28.1">5:7</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Rom&amp;scrCh=5&amp;scrV=8#iv.i-p28.2">5:8</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Rom&amp;scrCh=5&amp;scrV=8#iv.i-p36.1">5:8</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Rom&amp;scrCh=5&amp;scrV=9#iv.iii-p38.1">5:9</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Rom&amp;scrCh=5&amp;scrV=9#iv.iii-p133.1">5:9</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Rom&amp;scrCh=5&amp;scrV=10#iv.i-p28.3">5:10</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Rom&amp;scrCh=5&amp;scrV=12#iii.vii.ii-p78.1">5:12</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Rom&amp;scrCh=5&amp;scrV=12#iii.viii-p25.1">5:12</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Rom&amp;scrCh=5&amp;scrV=12#iii.viii-p36.1">5:12</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Rom&amp;scrCh=5&amp;scrV=14#iii.viii-p28.2">5:14</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Rom&amp;scrCh=5&amp;scrV=14#iv.iii-p102.1">5:14</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Rom&amp;scrCh=5&amp;scrV=18#iv.iii-p131.1">5:18</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Rom&amp;scrCh=5&amp;scrV=19#iii.viii-p26.1">5:19</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Rom&amp;scrCh=5&amp;scrV=21#iii.viii-p27.1">5:21</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Rom&amp;scrCh=6&amp;scrV=23#iii.vii.ii-p34.1">6:23</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Rom&amp;scrCh=7&amp;scrV=10#iii.vii.ii-p66.1">7:10</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Rom&amp;scrCh=7&amp;scrV=17#iv.ii-p172.1">7:17</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Rom&amp;scrCh=7&amp;scrV=29#iv.ii-p171.1">7:29</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Rom&amp;scrCh=8&amp;scrV=8#iii.vii.ii-p35.1">8:8</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Rom&amp;scrCh=8&amp;scrV=17#iv.iv.i-p7.1">8:17</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Rom&amp;scrCh=8&amp;scrV=19#iv.iii-p126.1">8:19</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Rom&amp;scrCh=8&amp;scrV=29#iii.iv-p18.1">8:29</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Rom&amp;scrCh=8&amp;scrV=34#iv.iii-p46.1">8:34</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Rom&amp;scrCh=9&amp;scrV=5#iv.ii-p25.1">9:5</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Rom&amp;scrCh=9&amp;scrV=8#iv.iv.i-p7.2">9:8</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Rom&amp;scrCh=9&amp;scrV=18#iii.iv-p223.1">9:18</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Rom&amp;scrCh=9&amp;scrV=18#iii.iv-p261.6">9:18</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Rom&amp;scrCh=9&amp;scrV=19#iii.iv-p247.1">9:19</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Rom&amp;scrCh=9&amp;scrV=19#iii.iv-p296.1">9:19</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Rom&amp;scrCh=9&amp;scrV=20#iii.iv-p247.2">9:20</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Rom&amp;scrCh=9&amp;scrV=20#iii.iv-p296.2">9:20</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Rom&amp;scrCh=9&amp;scrV=21#iii.iv-p247.3">9:21</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Rom&amp;scrCh=9&amp;scrV=21#iii.iv-p296.3">9:21</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Rom&amp;scrCh=10&amp;scrV=4#iv.iii-p127.1">10:4</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Rom&amp;scrCh=10&amp;scrV=5#iii.vii.ii-p67.1">10:5</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Rom&amp;scrCh=10&amp;scrV=10#iv.iv.v-p43.1">10:10</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Rom&amp;scrCh=11&amp;scrV=2#iii.iv-p19.1">11:2</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Rom&amp;scrCh=11&amp;scrV=7#iii.iv-p207.1">11:7</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Rom&amp;scrCh=11&amp;scrV=7#iii.iv-p280.1">11:7</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Rom&amp;scrCh=11&amp;scrV=8#iii.iv-p207.2">11:8</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Rom&amp;scrCh=11&amp;scrV=8#iii.iv-p280.2">11:8</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Rom&amp;scrCh=11&amp;scrV=31#iii.iv-p8.1">11:31</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Rom&amp;scrCh=11&amp;scrV=36#iii.iv-p24.1">11:36</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Rom&amp;scrCh=12&amp;scrV=2#iii.iv-p285.3">12:2</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Rom&amp;scrCh=12&amp;scrV=2#iv.iv.v-p88.1">12:2</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Rom&amp;scrCh=12&amp;scrV=8#iv.iv.v-p56.1">12:8</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Rom&amp;scrCh=13&amp;scrV=0#iii.viii-p107.2">13</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Rom&amp;scrCh=14&amp;scrV=10#iv.ii-p119.1">14:10</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Rom&amp;scrCh=14&amp;scrV=11#iv.ii-p119.2">14:11</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Rom&amp;scrCh=15&amp;scrV=1#iv.iv.iv-p16.1">15:1</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Rom&amp;scrCh=15&amp;scrV=3#iv.iv.iv-p16.2">15:3</a> </p>
<p class="bbook">1 Corinthians</p>
 <p class="bref">
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=1Cor&amp;scrCh=1&amp;scrV=2#iv.ii-p124.1">1:2</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=1Cor&amp;scrCh=1&amp;scrV=30#iv.ii-p287.1">1:30</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=1Cor&amp;scrCh=2&amp;scrV=2#iv.ii-p5.1">2:2</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=1Cor&amp;scrCh=2&amp;scrV=4#iii.iii-p29.2">2:4</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=1Cor&amp;scrCh=2&amp;scrV=7#iii.iv-p5.3">2:7</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=1Cor&amp;scrCh=2&amp;scrV=11#iii.iii-p29.1">2:11</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=1Cor&amp;scrCh=2&amp;scrV=14#iii.i-p62.1">2:14</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=1Cor&amp;scrCh=2&amp;scrV=14#iv.iv.v-p4.1">2:14</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=1Cor&amp;scrCh=5&amp;scrV=7#iv.iii-p26.1">5:7</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=1Cor&amp;scrCh=6&amp;scrV=17#iv.iv.i-p15.1">6:17</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=1Cor&amp;scrCh=6&amp;scrV=20#iv.iii-p45.1">6:20</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=1Cor&amp;scrCh=7&amp;scrV=23#iv.iii-p45.2">7:23</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=1Cor&amp;scrCh=8&amp;scrV=1#iv.iv.v-p41.1">8:1</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=1Cor&amp;scrCh=8&amp;scrV=2#iv.iv.v-p41.2">8:2</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=1Cor&amp;scrCh=8&amp;scrV=3#iv.iv.v-p41.3">8:3</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=1Cor&amp;scrCh=12&amp;scrV=6#iv.iv.v-p94.1">12:6</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=1Cor&amp;scrCh=13&amp;scrV=4#iii.viii-p99.1">13:4</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=1Cor&amp;scrCh=13&amp;scrV=5#iv.iv.iv-p27.1">13:5</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=1Cor&amp;scrCh=15&amp;scrV=3#iv.iii-p48.1">15:3</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=1Cor&amp;scrCh=15&amp;scrV=24#iv.iii-p160.1">15:24</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=1Cor&amp;scrCh=15&amp;scrV=28#iv.iii-p160.2">15:28</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=1Cor&amp;scrCh=15&amp;scrV=45#iv.iii-p102.2">15:45</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=1Cor&amp;scrCh=15&amp;scrV=47#iv.ii-p192.1">15:47</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=1Cor&amp;scrCh=15&amp;scrV=47#iv.iii-p102.2">15:47</a> </p>
<p class="bbook">2 Corinthians</p>
 <p class="bref">
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=2Cor&amp;scrCh=3&amp;scrV=0#iv.iv.v-p15.1">3</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=2Cor&amp;scrCh=3&amp;scrV=18#iii.v-p31.1">3:18</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=2Cor&amp;scrCh=4&amp;scrV=3#iv.iv.v-p6.1">4:3</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=2Cor&amp;scrCh=4&amp;scrV=4#iv.iv.v-p6.2">4:4</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=2Cor&amp;scrCh=4&amp;scrV=6#iv.iv.v-p30.1">4:6</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=2Cor&amp;scrCh=4&amp;scrV=6#iv.iv.v-p83.2">4:6</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=2Cor&amp;scrCh=4&amp;scrV=6#iv.iv.v-p91.1">4:6</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=2Cor&amp;scrCh=8&amp;scrV=2#iv.iv.v-p58.1">8:2</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=2Cor&amp;scrCh=8&amp;scrV=8#iv.iv.iv-p19.1">8:8</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=2Cor&amp;scrCh=8&amp;scrV=9#iv.iii-p193.1">8:9</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=2Cor&amp;scrCh=8&amp;scrV=9#iv.iv.iv-p19.2">8:9</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=2Cor&amp;scrCh=9&amp;scrV=11#iv.iv.v-p59.1">9:11</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=2Cor&amp;scrCh=9&amp;scrV=13#iv.iv.v-p60.1">9:13</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=2Cor&amp;scrCh=11&amp;scrV=2#iv.ii-p55.1">11:2</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=2Cor&amp;scrCh=13&amp;scrV=14#iii.iii-p6.1">13:14</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=2Cor&amp;scrCh=13&amp;scrV=14#iv.ii-p139.1">13:14</a> </p>
<p class="bbook">Galatians</p>
 <p class="bref">
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Gal&amp;scrCh=2&amp;scrV=20#iv.iii-p191.1">2:20</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Gal&amp;scrCh=3&amp;scrV=7#iv.iv.i-p7.3">3:7</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Gal&amp;scrCh=3&amp;scrV=10#iii.vii.ii-p5.1">3:10</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Gal&amp;scrCh=3&amp;scrV=10#iv.iii-p9.1">3:10</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Gal&amp;scrCh=3&amp;scrV=12#iii.vii.ii-p67.2">3:12</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Gal&amp;scrCh=3&amp;scrV=13#iv.iii-p89.1">3:13</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Gal&amp;scrCh=3&amp;scrV=13#iv.iii-p102.3">3:13</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Gal&amp;scrCh=3&amp;scrV=13#iv.iii-p136.1">3:13</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Gal&amp;scrCh=3&amp;scrV=27#iv.iv.i-p7.3">3:27</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Gal&amp;scrCh=3&amp;scrV=27#iv.iv.i-p7.3">3:27</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Gal&amp;scrCh=3&amp;scrV=29#iv.iv.i-p7.3">3:29</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Gal&amp;scrCh=4&amp;scrV=4#iv.ii-p232.1">4:4</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Gal&amp;scrCh=4&amp;scrV=4#iv.iii-p21.1">4:4</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Gal&amp;scrCh=4&amp;scrV=4#iv.iii-p115.1">4:4</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Gal&amp;scrCh=4&amp;scrV=5#iv.iii-p21.2">4:5</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Gal&amp;scrCh=4&amp;scrV=28#iv.iv.i-p7.4">4:28</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Gal&amp;scrCh=5&amp;scrV=15#iii.iv-p236.1">5:15</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Gal&amp;scrCh=6&amp;scrV=1#iii.iv-p305.1">6:1</a> </p>
<p class="bbook">Ephesians</p>
 <p class="bref">
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Eph&amp;scrCh=1&amp;scrV=4#iii.iv-p5.2">1:4</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Eph&amp;scrCh=1&amp;scrV=4#iv.i-p70.1">1:4</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Eph&amp;scrCh=1&amp;scrV=7#iv.i-p48.1">1:7</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Eph&amp;scrCh=1&amp;scrV=7#iv.iii-p26.4">1:7</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Eph&amp;scrCh=1&amp;scrV=7#iv.iii-p39.1">1:7</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Eph&amp;scrCh=1&amp;scrV=7#iv.iii-p135.1">1:7</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Eph&amp;scrCh=1&amp;scrV=22#iv.i-p59.1">1:22</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Eph&amp;scrCh=1&amp;scrV=22#iv.ii-p76.1">1:22</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Eph&amp;scrCh=2&amp;scrV=4#iv.i-p47.1">2:4</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Eph&amp;scrCh=2&amp;scrV=6#iv.ii-p295.1">2:6</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Eph&amp;scrCh=2&amp;scrV=6#iv.i-p48.2">2:6-7</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Eph&amp;scrCh=2&amp;scrV=8#iv.i-p42.1">2:8</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Eph&amp;scrCh=2&amp;scrV=10#iv.iv.ii-p8.1">2:10</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Eph&amp;scrCh=2&amp;scrV=12#iii.ii-p99.1">2:12</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Eph&amp;scrCh=2&amp;scrV=19#iv.iv.v-p101.1">2:19</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Eph&amp;scrCh=3&amp;scrV=10#iv.i-p64.1">3:10</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Eph&amp;scrCh=3&amp;scrV=11#iii.iv-p5.1">3:11</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Eph&amp;scrCh=3&amp;scrV=11#iv.i-p70.2">3:11</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Eph&amp;scrCh=3&amp;scrV=19#iv.i-p47.2">3:19</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Eph&amp;scrCh=4&amp;scrV=4#iv.ii-p58.1">4:4</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Eph&amp;scrCh=4&amp;scrV=9#iv.iii-p144.1">4:9</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Eph&amp;scrCh=4&amp;scrV=12#iv.iii-p144.2">4:12</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Eph&amp;scrCh=4&amp;scrV=13#iv.iii-p144.3">4:13</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Eph&amp;scrCh=4&amp;scrV=18#iii.ii-p97.1">4:18</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Eph&amp;scrCh=4&amp;scrV=18#iii.ii-p99.2">4:18</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Eph&amp;scrCh=4&amp;scrV=18#iv.iv.v-p14.1">4:18</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Eph&amp;scrCh=4&amp;scrV=22#iii.iv-p285.4">4:22-24</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Eph&amp;scrCh=4&amp;scrV=23#iii.v-p29.1">4:23</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Eph&amp;scrCh=4&amp;scrV=23#iv.iv.v-p32.1">4:23</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Eph&amp;scrCh=4&amp;scrV=24#iii.v-p29.2">4:24</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Eph&amp;scrCh=4&amp;scrV=24#iv.iv.v-p32.2">4:24</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Eph&amp;scrCh=5&amp;scrV=2#iv.iii-p192.1">5:2</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Eph&amp;scrCh=5&amp;scrV=8#iv.iv.v-p5.1">5:8</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Eph&amp;scrCh=5&amp;scrV=14#iv.iv.v-p21.1">5:14</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Eph&amp;scrCh=5&amp;scrV=27#iv.ii-p50.1">5:27</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Eph&amp;scrCh=5&amp;scrV=28#iv.ii-p43.1">5:28</a> </p>
<p class="bbook">Philippians</p>
 <p class="bref">
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Phil&amp;scrCh=1&amp;scrV=6#iv.iv.ii-p29.1">1:6</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Phil&amp;scrCh=1&amp;scrV=9#iv.iv.v-p67.1">1:9</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Phil&amp;scrCh=2&amp;scrV=4#iv.iv.iv-p20.1">2:4</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Phil&amp;scrCh=2&amp;scrV=5#iv.iv.iv-p20.2">2:5</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Phil&amp;scrCh=2&amp;scrV=6#iv.ii-p91.1">2:6</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Phil&amp;scrCh=2&amp;scrV=6#iv.iii-p68.1">2:6</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Phil&amp;scrCh=2&amp;scrV=6#iv.iv.iv-p20.3">2:6</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Phil&amp;scrCh=2&amp;scrV=7#iv.iii-p68.2">2:7</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Phil&amp;scrCh=2&amp;scrV=7#iv.iii-p114.1">2:7</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Phil&amp;scrCh=2&amp;scrV=7#iv.iii-p120.1">2:7</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Phil&amp;scrCh=2&amp;scrV=7#iv.iv.iv-p20.4">2:7</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Phil&amp;scrCh=2&amp;scrV=8#iv.iii-p19.1">2:8</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Phil&amp;scrCh=2&amp;scrV=8#iv.iii-p68.3">2:8</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Phil&amp;scrCh=2&amp;scrV=8#iv.iii-p114.2">2:8</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Phil&amp;scrCh=2&amp;scrV=8#iv.iii-p120.2">2:8</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Phil&amp;scrCh=2&amp;scrV=8#iv.iii-p129.1">2:8</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Phil&amp;scrCh=2&amp;scrV=8#iv.iv.iv-p20.5">2:8</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Phil&amp;scrCh=2&amp;scrV=9#iv.ii-p117.1">2:9</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Phil&amp;scrCh=2&amp;scrV=9#iv.iii-p19.2">2:9</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Phil&amp;scrCh=2&amp;scrV=9#iv.iii-p120.3">2:9</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Phil&amp;scrCh=2&amp;scrV=10#iv.ii-p117.2">2:10</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Phil&amp;scrCh=2&amp;scrV=11#iv.ii-p117.3">2:11</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Phil&amp;scrCh=2&amp;scrV=13#iv.iv.ii-p29.2">2:13</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Phil&amp;scrCh=3&amp;scrV=8#iv.ii-p6.1">3:8</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Phil&amp;scrCh=3&amp;scrV=10#iv.ii-p6.2">3:10</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Phil&amp;scrCh=3&amp;scrV=21#iv.ii-p77.1">3:21</a> </p>
<p class="bbook">Colossians</p>
 <p class="bref">
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Col&amp;scrCh=1&amp;scrV=13#iv.iv.v-p8.2">1:13</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Col&amp;scrCh=1&amp;scrV=15#iv.ii-p164.1">1:15</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Col&amp;scrCh=1&amp;scrV=16#iii.iii-p10.1">1:16</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Col&amp;scrCh=1&amp;scrV=16#iii.iv-p25.1">1:16</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Col&amp;scrCh=1&amp;scrV=16#iii.v-p35.1">1:16</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Col&amp;scrCh=1&amp;scrV=16#iv.ii-p101.1">1:16</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Col&amp;scrCh=1&amp;scrV=17#iv.ii-p102.1">1:17</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Col&amp;scrCh=1&amp;scrV=19#iv.ii-p287.2">1:19</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Col&amp;scrCh=3&amp;scrV=10#iii.v-p30.1">3:10</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Col&amp;scrCh=3&amp;scrV=10#iv.iv.v-p31.1">3:10</a> </p>
<p class="bbook">1 Thessalonians</p>
 <p class="bref">
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=1Thess&amp;scrCh=1&amp;scrV=10#iv.iii-p26.5">1:10</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=1Thess&amp;scrCh=3&amp;scrV=5#iii.iv-p305.2">3:5</a> </p>
<p class="bbook">2 Thessalonians</p>
 <p class="bref">
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=2Thess&amp;scrCh=1&amp;scrV=7#iv.iv.v-p7.1">1:7</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=2Thess&amp;scrCh=1&amp;scrV=8#iv.iv.v-p7.2">1:8</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=2Thess&amp;scrCh=1&amp;scrV=8#iv.i-p13.2">1:8-9</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=2Thess&amp;scrCh=1&amp;scrV=11#iv.i-p44.1">1:11</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=2Thess&amp;scrCh=1&amp;scrV=11#iv.iv.v-p101.2">1:11</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=2Thess&amp;scrCh=2&amp;scrV=3#iii.i-p36.1">2:3-12</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=2Thess&amp;scrCh=2&amp;scrV=11#iii.vii.ii-p53.3">2:11</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=2Thess&amp;scrCh=2&amp;scrV=11#iii.iv-p201.1">2:11</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=2Thess&amp;scrCh=2&amp;scrV=12#iii.iv-p201.2">2:12</a> </p>
<p class="bbook">1 Timothy</p>
 <p class="bref">
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=1Tim&amp;scrCh=3&amp;scrV=16#iv.ii-p30.1">3:16</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=1Tim&amp;scrCh=3&amp;scrV=26#iv.ii-p235.1">3:26</a> </p>
<p class="bbook">2 Timothy</p>
 <p class="bref">
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=2Tim&amp;scrCh=1&amp;scrV=9#iii.iv-p5.4">1:9</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=2Tim&amp;scrCh=1&amp;scrV=9#iv.i-p69.1">1:9</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=2Tim&amp;scrCh=3&amp;scrV=1#iii.viii-p105.1">3:1-5</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=2Tim&amp;scrCh=3&amp;scrV=16#iii.iii-p30.1">3:16</a> </p>
<p class="bbook">Titus</p>
 <p class="bref">
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Titus&amp;scrCh=1&amp;scrV=3#iv.ii-p46.1">1:3</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Titus&amp;scrCh=2&amp;scrV=10#iv.ii-p46.2">2:10</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Titus&amp;scrCh=2&amp;scrV=13#iv.ii-p26.1">2:13</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Titus&amp;scrCh=2&amp;scrV=13#iv.ii-p46.2">2:13</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Titus&amp;scrCh=3&amp;scrV=3#iv.iv.ii-p9.1">3:3</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Titus&amp;scrCh=3&amp;scrV=4#iv.ii-p46.3">3:4</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Titus&amp;scrCh=3&amp;scrV=4#iv.iv.ii-p9.2">3:4</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Titus&amp;scrCh=3&amp;scrV=5#iii.iii-p25.1">3:5</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Titus&amp;scrCh=3&amp;scrV=5#iii.iv-p284.4">3:5</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Titus&amp;scrCh=3&amp;scrV=5#iv.iv.ii-p9.3">3:5</a> </p>
<p class="bbook">Hebrews</p>
 <p class="bref">
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Heb&amp;scrCh=1&amp;scrV=2#iv.i-p58.1">1:2</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Heb&amp;scrCh=1&amp;scrV=3#iv.ii-p79.1">1:3</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Heb&amp;scrCh=1&amp;scrV=3#iv.ii-p103.1">1:3</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Heb&amp;scrCh=1&amp;scrV=3#iv.ii-p199.2">1:3</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Heb&amp;scrCh=1&amp;scrV=6#iv.ii-p113.1">1:6</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Heb&amp;scrCh=1&amp;scrV=8#iv.ii-p29.1">1:8</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Heb&amp;scrCh=1&amp;scrV=8#iv.iii-p170.1">1:8</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Heb&amp;scrCh=1&amp;scrV=9#iv.iii-p18.1">1:9</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Heb&amp;scrCh=1&amp;scrV=9#iv.iii-p170.2">1:9</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Heb&amp;scrCh=1&amp;scrV=10#iv.ii-p104.2">1:10</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Heb&amp;scrCh=1&amp;scrV=12#iv.ii-p72.1">1:12</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Heb&amp;scrCh=1&amp;scrV=14#iii.v-p34.1">1:14</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Heb&amp;scrCh=1&amp;scrV=14#iv.i-p65.1">1:14</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Heb&amp;scrCh=2&amp;scrV=14#iv.ii-p272.1">2:14</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Heb&amp;scrCh=2&amp;scrV=14#iv.ii-p175.1">2:14</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Heb&amp;scrCh=2&amp;scrV=16#iv.ii-p272.2">2:16</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Heb&amp;scrCh=2&amp;scrV=16#iv.ii-p175.2">2:16</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Heb&amp;scrCh=2&amp;scrV=17#iv.ii-p177.1">2:17</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Heb&amp;scrCh=3&amp;scrV=10#iv.iv.v-p17.1">3:10</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Heb&amp;scrCh=6&amp;scrV=20#iv.iii-p149.1">6:20</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Heb&amp;scrCh=7&amp;scrV=3#iv.ii-p246.1">7:3</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Heb&amp;scrCh=7&amp;scrV=3#iv.ii-p69.1">7:3</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Heb&amp;scrCh=7&amp;scrV=24#iv.iii-p149.2">7:24-25</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Heb&amp;scrCh=7&amp;scrV=26#iv.ii-p286.1">7:26</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Heb&amp;scrCh=7&amp;scrV=26#iv.ii-p190.1">7:26</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Heb&amp;scrCh=8&amp;scrV=10#iv.iv.v-p85.1">8:10</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Heb&amp;scrCh=8&amp;scrV=11#iv.iv.v-p85.2">8:11</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Heb&amp;scrCh=9&amp;scrV=15#iv.iii-p50.1">9:15</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Heb&amp;scrCh=9&amp;scrV=28#iv.iii-p33.1">9:28</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Heb&amp;scrCh=10&amp;scrV=4#iv.iii-p27.4">10:4-9</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Heb&amp;scrCh=10&amp;scrV=32#iv.iv.v-p9.1">10:32</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Heb&amp;scrCh=12&amp;scrV=23#iv.ii-p166.1">12:23</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Heb&amp;scrCh=13&amp;scrV=8#iv.ii-p73.1">13:8</a> </p>
<p class="bbook">James</p>
 <p class="bref">
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Jas&amp;scrCh=1&amp;scrV=5#iv.iv.v-p61.1">1:5</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Jas&amp;scrCh=1&amp;scrV=18#iv.iv.ii-p20.1">1:18</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Jas&amp;scrCh=3&amp;scrV=17#iv.iv.iv-p28.1">3:17</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Jas&amp;scrCh=4&amp;scrV=2#iii.iv-p235.1">4:2</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Jas&amp;scrCh=4&amp;scrV=8#iii.iv-p285.7">4:8</a> </p>
<p class="bbook">1 Peter</p>
 <p class="bref">
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=1Pet&amp;scrCh=1&amp;scrV=2#iii.iv-p20.1">1:2</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=1Pet&amp;scrCh=1&amp;scrV=11#iv.iii-p143.1">1:11</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=1Pet&amp;scrCh=1&amp;scrV=12#iv.i-p63.1">1:12</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=1Pet&amp;scrCh=1&amp;scrV=19#iv.iii-p41.1">1:19</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=1Pet&amp;scrCh=1&amp;scrV=20#iv.i-p68.1">1:20</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=1Pet&amp;scrCh=1&amp;scrV=21#iii.iii-p30.2">1:21</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=1Pet&amp;scrCh=1&amp;scrV=22#iii.iv-p285.5">1:22</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=1Pet&amp;scrCh=2&amp;scrV=7#iv.ii-p290.1">2:7</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=1Pet&amp;scrCh=2&amp;scrV=7#iv.ii-p62.1">2:7</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=1Pet&amp;scrCh=2&amp;scrV=8#iv.ii-p290.2">2:8</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=1Pet&amp;scrCh=2&amp;scrV=8#iv.ii-p62.2">2:8</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=1Pet&amp;scrCh=2&amp;scrV=9#iv.iv.v-p8.3">2:9</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=1Pet&amp;scrCh=2&amp;scrV=24#iv.iii-p34.1">2:24</a> </p>
<p class="bbook">2 Peter</p>
 <p class="bref">
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=2Pet&amp;scrCh=1&amp;scrV=11#iv.ii-p44.1">1:11</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=2Pet&amp;scrCh=1&amp;scrV=17#iv.ii-p196.1">1:17</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=2Pet&amp;scrCh=2&amp;scrV=1#iv.ii-p10.1">2:1</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=2Pet&amp;scrCh=2&amp;scrV=4#iv.i-p11.1">2:4</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=2Pet&amp;scrCh=2&amp;scrV=20#iv.ii-p44.2">2:20</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=2Pet&amp;scrCh=3&amp;scrV=2#iv.ii-p44.3">3:2</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=2Pet&amp;scrCh=3&amp;scrV=18#iv.ii-p44.3">3:18</a> </p>
<p class="bbook">1 John</p>
 <p class="bref">
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=1John&amp;scrCh=1&amp;scrV=5#iv.iv.v-p38.1">1:5</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=1John&amp;scrCh=1&amp;scrV=7#iv.iii-p40.1">1:7</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=1John&amp;scrCh=2&amp;scrV=0#iv.iii-p141.4">2</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=1John&amp;scrCh=2&amp;scrV=4#iii.ii-p40.1">2:4</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=1John&amp;scrCh=2&amp;scrV=9#iv.iv.v-p18.1">2:9</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=1John&amp;scrCh=2&amp;scrV=9#iv.iv.v-p36.1">2:9</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=1John&amp;scrCh=2&amp;scrV=10#iv.iv.v-p36.2">2:10</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=1John&amp;scrCh=2&amp;scrV=10#iv.iv.v-p80.3">2:10</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=1John&amp;scrCh=2&amp;scrV=11#iv.iv.v-p18.2">2:11</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=1John&amp;scrCh=2&amp;scrV=11#iv.iv.v-p36.3">2:11</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=1John&amp;scrCh=3&amp;scrV=0#iii.iv-p285.6">3</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=1John&amp;scrCh=3&amp;scrV=0#iii.iv-p285.6">3</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=1John&amp;scrCh=3&amp;scrV=1#iv.i-p23.1">3:1</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=1John&amp;scrCh=3&amp;scrV=4#iv.i-p23.2">3:4</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=1John&amp;scrCh=3&amp;scrV=8#iv.i-p23.3">3:8</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=1John&amp;scrCh=3&amp;scrV=8#iii.viii-p115.1">3:8</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=1John&amp;scrCh=3&amp;scrV=8#iv.ii-p236.1">3:8</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=1John&amp;scrCh=3&amp;scrV=9#iii.iii-p26.2">3:9</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=1John&amp;scrCh=3&amp;scrV=9#iv.i-p23.4">3:9</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=1John&amp;scrCh=3&amp;scrV=10#iv.i-p23.5">3:10</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=1John&amp;scrCh=3&amp;scrV=16#iv.i-p37.1">3:16</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=1John&amp;scrCh=4&amp;scrV=7#iii.iii-p26.3">4:7</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=1John&amp;scrCh=4&amp;scrV=7#iii.viii-p73.1">4:7</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=1John&amp;scrCh=4&amp;scrV=7#iv.iv.v-p34.1">4:7</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=1John&amp;scrCh=4&amp;scrV=8#iii.ii-p41.1">4:8</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=1John&amp;scrCh=4&amp;scrV=8#iii.viii-p73.2">4:8</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=1John&amp;scrCh=4&amp;scrV=8#iv.iv.iv-p13.1">4:8</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=1John&amp;scrCh=4&amp;scrV=8#iv.iv.v-p34.2">4:8</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=1John&amp;scrCh=4&amp;scrV=8#iv.iv.v-p39.1">4:8</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=1John&amp;scrCh=4&amp;scrV=9#iv.ii-p231.1">4:9</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=1John&amp;scrCh=4&amp;scrV=9#iv.iv.iv-p48.1">4:9</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=1John&amp;scrCh=4&amp;scrV=9#iv.i-p37.2">4:9-10</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=1John&amp;scrCh=4&amp;scrV=10#iv.ii-p231.2">4:10</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=1John&amp;scrCh=4&amp;scrV=15#iv.ii-p204.1">4:15</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=1John&amp;scrCh=5&amp;scrV=1#iii.iii-p26.4">5:1</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=1John&amp;scrCh=5&amp;scrV=4#iii.iii-p26.4">5:4</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=1John&amp;scrCh=5&amp;scrV=5#iv.ii-p204.2">5:5</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=1John&amp;scrCh=5&amp;scrV=7#iii.iii-p4.1">5:7</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=1John&amp;scrCh=5&amp;scrV=7#iv.ii-p19.1">5:7</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=1John&amp;scrCh=5&amp;scrV=12#iv.ii-p204.2">5:12</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=1John&amp;scrCh=5&amp;scrV=13#iv.ii-p204.2">5:13</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=1John&amp;scrCh=5&amp;scrV=18#iii.iii-p26.4">5:18</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=1John&amp;scrCh=5&amp;scrV=20#iv.ii-p210.1">5:20</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=1John&amp;scrCh=5&amp;scrV=20#iv.iv.v-p92.1">5:20</a> </p>
<p class="bbook">Jude</p>
 <p class="bref">
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Jude&amp;scrCh=1&amp;scrV=4#iv.ii-p10.2">1:4</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Jude&amp;scrCh=1&amp;scrV=6#iv.i-p11.2">1:6</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Jude&amp;scrCh=1&amp;scrV=24#iv.ii-p48.1">1:24-25</a> </p>
<p class="bbook">Revelation</p>
 <p class="bref">
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Rev&amp;scrCh=1&amp;scrV=5#iv.iii-p195.1">1:5-6</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Rev&amp;scrCh=1&amp;scrV=8#iv.ii-p70.1">1:8</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Rev&amp;scrCh=1&amp;scrV=8#iv.ii-p78.1">1:8</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Rev&amp;scrCh=1&amp;scrV=8#iv.ii-p163.1">1:8</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Rev&amp;scrCh=1&amp;scrV=17#iv.ii-p70.2">1:17</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Rev&amp;scrCh=1&amp;scrV=18#iv.ii-p114.1">1:18</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Rev&amp;scrCh=2&amp;scrV=7#iii.vii.ii-p65.1">2:7</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Rev&amp;scrCh=2&amp;scrV=23#iv.ii-p85.1">2:23</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Rev&amp;scrCh=3&amp;scrV=14#iv.ii-p162.1">3:14</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Rev&amp;scrCh=4&amp;scrV=8#iii.iii-p18.1">4:8</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Rev&amp;scrCh=5&amp;scrV=8#iv.ii-p114.2">5:8-9</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Rev&amp;scrCh=5&amp;scrV=9#iv.iii-p42.1">5:9</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Rev&amp;scrCh=5&amp;scrV=9#iv.iii-p45.3">5:9</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Rev&amp;scrCh=5&amp;scrV=11#iv.ii-p114.2">5:11</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Rev&amp;scrCh=5&amp;scrV=12#iv.ii-p114.2">5:12</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Rev&amp;scrCh=5&amp;scrV=13#iv.ii-p114.2">5:13</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Rev&amp;scrCh=5&amp;scrV=14#iv.ii-p114.2">5:14</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Rev&amp;scrCh=12&amp;scrV=9#iii.viii-p5.1">12:9</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Rev&amp;scrCh=12&amp;scrV=14#iii.viii-p5.2">12:14</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Rev&amp;scrCh=12&amp;scrV=15#iii.viii-p5.3">12:15</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Rev&amp;scrCh=17&amp;scrV=17#iii.iv-p188.1">17:17</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Rev&amp;scrCh=19&amp;scrV=7#iv.ii-p56.1">19:7</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Rev&amp;scrCh=19&amp;scrV=10#iv.ii-p129.1">19:10</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Rev&amp;scrCh=19&amp;scrV=12#iv.ii-p90.1">19:12</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Rev&amp;scrCh=19&amp;scrV=13#iv.ii-p20.1">19:13</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Rev&amp;scrCh=20&amp;scrV=2#iii.viii-p5.4">20:2</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Rev&amp;scrCh=20&amp;scrV=10#iv.i-p12.2">20:10</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Rev&amp;scrCh=20&amp;scrV=10#iv.i-p13.1">20:10</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Rev&amp;scrCh=20&amp;scrV=15#iv.i-p13.1">20:15</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Rev&amp;scrCh=21&amp;scrV=1#iii.v-p13.1">21:1</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Rev&amp;scrCh=21&amp;scrV=2#iv.ii-p57.1">21:2</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Rev&amp;scrCh=21&amp;scrV=6#iv.ii-p163.2">21:6</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Rev&amp;scrCh=21&amp;scrV=8#iii.vii.ii-p36.1">21:8</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Rev&amp;scrCh=21&amp;scrV=9#iv.ii-p57.2">21:9</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Rev&amp;scrCh=21&amp;scrV=22#iv.iii-p146.1">21:22</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Rev&amp;scrCh=22&amp;scrV=6#iv.ii-p63.1">22:6</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Rev&amp;scrCh=22&amp;scrV=8#iv.ii-p40.1">22:8</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Rev&amp;scrCh=22&amp;scrV=9#iv.ii-p129.2">22:9</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Rev&amp;scrCh=22&amp;scrV=11#iv.ii-p38.1">22:11</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Rev&amp;scrCh=22&amp;scrV=13#iv.ii-p37.1">22:13</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Rev&amp;scrCh=22&amp;scrV=13#iv.ii-p70.3">22:13</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Rev&amp;scrCh=22&amp;scrV=15#iv.ii-p163.3">22:15</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Rev&amp;scrCh=22&amp;scrV=16#iv.ii-p63.2">22:16</a>  
 <a class="TOC" href="?scrBook=Rev&amp;scrCh=22&amp;scrV=17#iv.ii-p39.1">22:17</a> </p>
</div>




</div2>

<div2 title="Greek Words and Phrases" prev="v.i" next="v.iii" id="v.ii">
  <h2 id="v.ii-p0.1">Index of Greek Words and Phrases</h2>
  <div class="Greek" id="v.ii-p0.2">
    <insertIndex type="foreign" lang="EL" id="v.ii-p0.3" />



<div class="Index">
<ul class="Index1">
 <li><span class="Greek">Κινουμεθα: 
  <a class="TOC" href="#iii.iv-p299.1">1</a></span></li>
 <li><span class="Greek">απλοτης: 
  <a class="TOC" href="#iv.iv.v-p55.2">1</a></span></li>
 <li><span class="Greek">απλοτηστι: 
  <a class="TOC" href="#iv.iv.v-p55.3">1</a></span></li>
 <li><span class="Greek">απλοτητ της κοινωνίας: 
  <a class="TOC" href="#iv.iv.v-p59.3">1</a></span></li>
 <li><span class="Greek">απλοτητος: 
  <a class="TOC" href="#iv.iv.v-p58.2">1</a></span></li>
 <li><span class="Greek">απλους: 
  <a class="TOC" href="#iv.iv.v-p55.1">1</a></span></li>
 <li><span class="Greek">απλως: 
  <a class="TOC" href="#iv.iv.v-p60.2">1</a></span></li>
 <li><span class="Greek">εἰς πασαν απλοτητα: 
  <a class="TOC" href="#iv.iv.v-p59.2">1</a></span></li>
</ul>
</div>



  </div>
</div2>

<div2 title="Latin Words and Phrases" prev="v.ii" next="v.iv" id="v.iii">
  <h2 id="v.iii-p0.1">Index of Latin Words and Phrases</h2>
  <insertIndex type="foreign" lang="LA" id="v.iii-p0.2" />



<div class="Index">
<ul class="Index1">
 <li> Sed trahit invitam nova vis, aliudque cupido; Mens aliud suadet. Video meliora proboque: Deteriora sequor.— : 
  <a class="TOC" href="#iv.iv.v-p76.1">1</a></li>
 <li>Qui sequitur Deum, emendate fane loquitur.: 
  <a class="TOC" href="#iii.iv-p258.1">1</a></li>
 <li>ad extra: 
  <a class="TOC" href="#iii.ii-p35.1">1</a>
  <a class="TOC" href="#iii.iii-p33.8">2</a>
  <a class="TOC" href="#iii.iv-p1.1">3</a></li>
 <li>argumentum ad hominem: 
  <a class="TOC" href="#iii.iv-p265.1">1</a></li>
 <li>frigidi speculatores, diluti moderatores: 
  <a class="TOC" href="#iii.iv-p261.2">1</a></li>
</ul>
</div>



</div2>

<div2 title="Index of Pages of the Print Edition" prev="v.iii" next="toc" id="v.iv">
  <h2 id="v.iv-p0.1">Index of Pages of the Print Edition</h2>
  <insertIndex type="pb" id="v.iv-p0.2" />



<div class="Index">
<p class="pages"><a class="TOC" href="#i-Page_1">1</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#i-Page_2">2</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#i-Page_3">3</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#ii.i-Page_4">4</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#ii.i-Page_5">5</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#ii.i-Page_6">6</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#ii.i-Page_7">7</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#ii.ii-Page_8">8</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#ii.ii-Page_9">9</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iii.i-Page_10">10</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iii.i-Page_11">11</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iii.i-Page_12">12</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iii.i-Page_13">13</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iii.i-Page_14">14</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iii.i-Page_15">15</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iii.i-Page_16">16</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iii.i-Page_17">17</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iii.i-Page_18">18</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iii.i-Page_19">19</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iii.i-Page_20">20</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iii.i-Page_21">21</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iii.i-Page_22">22</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iii.i-Page_23">23</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iii.i-Page_24">24</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iii.i-Page_25">25</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iii.i-Page_26">26</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iii.i-Page_27">27</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iii.i-Page_28">28</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iii.i-Page_29">29</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iii.i-Page_30">30</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iii.i-Page_31">31</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iii.i-Page_32">32</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iii.i-Page_33">33</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iii.i-Page_34">34</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iii.i-Page_35">35</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iii.i-Page_36">36</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iii.i-Page_37">37</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iii.i-Page_38">38</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iii.i-Page_39">39</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iii.ii-Page_40">40</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iii.ii-Page_41">41</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iii.ii-Page_42">42</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iii.ii-Page_43">43</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iii.ii-Page_44">44</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iii.ii-Page_45">45</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iii.ii-Page_46">46</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iii.ii-Page_47">47</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iii.ii-Page_48">48</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iii.ii-Page_49">49</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iii.ii-Page_50">50</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iii.ii-Page_51">51</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iii.ii-Page_52">52</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iii.ii-Page_53">53</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iii.ii-Page_54">54</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iii.ii-Page_55">55</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iii.ii-Page_56">56</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iii.ii-Page_57">57</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iii.ii-Page_58">58</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iii.ii-Page_59">59</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iii.ii-Page_60">60</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iii.ii-Page_61">61</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iii.ii-Page_62">62</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iii.ii-Page_63">63</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iii.ii-Page_64">64</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iii.ii-Page_65">65</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iii.ii-Page_66">66</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iii.ii-Page_67">67</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iii.ii-Page_68">68</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iii.ii-Page_69">69</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iii.ii-Page_70">70</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iii.ii-Page_71">71</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iii.ii-Page_72">72</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iii.ii-Page_73">73</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iii.ii-Page_74">74</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iii.ii-Page_75">75</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iii.ii-Page_76">76</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iii.iii-Page_77">77</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iii.iii-Page_78">78</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iii.iii-Page_79">79</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iii.iii-Page_80">80</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iii.iii-Page_81">81</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iii.iii-Page_82">82</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iii.iii-Page_83">83</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iii.iii-Page_84">84</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iii.iv-Page_85">85</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iii.iv-Page_86">86</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iii.iv-Page_87">87</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iii.iv-Page_88">88</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iii.iv-Page_89">89</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iii.iv-Page_90">90</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iii.iv-Page_91">91</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iii.iv-Page_92">92</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iii.iv-Page_93">93</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iii.iv-Page_94">94</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iii.iv-Page_95">95</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iii.iv-Page_96">96</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iii.iv-Page_97">97</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iii.iv-Page_98">98</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iii.iv-Page_99">99</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iii.iv-Page_100">100</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iii.iv-Page_101">101</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iii.iv-Page_102">102</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iii.iv-Page_103">103</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iii.iv-Page_104">104</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iii.iv-Page_105">105</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iii.iv-Page_106">106</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iii.iv-Page_107">107</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iii.iv-Page_108">108</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iii.iv-Page_109">109</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iii.iv-Page_110">110</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iii.iv-Page_111">111</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iii.iv-Page_112">112</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iii.iv-Page_113">113</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iii.iv-Page_114">114</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iii.iv-Page_115">115</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iii.iv-Page_116">116</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iii.iv-Page_117">117</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iii.iv-Page_118">118</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iii.iv-Page_119">119</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iii.iv-Page_420">420</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iii.iv-Page_121">121</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iii.iv-Page_122">122</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iii.iv-Page_123">123</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iii.iv-Page_124">124</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iii.iv-Page_125">125</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iii.iv-Page_126">126</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iii.iv-Page_127">127</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iii.iv-Page_129">129</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iii.iv-Page_129_1">129</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iii.iv-Page_130">130</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iii.iv-Page_131">131</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iii.iv-Page_132">132</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iii.iv-Page_133">133</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iii.iv-Page_134">134</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iii.iv-Page_135">135</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iii.iv-Page_136">136</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iii.iv-Page_137">137</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iii.iv-Page_138">138</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iii.iv-Page_139">139</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iii.iv-Page_140">140</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iii.iv-Page_141">141</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iii.iv-Page_142">142</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iii.iv-Page_143">143</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iii.iv-Page_144">144</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iii.iv-Page_145">145</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iii.iv-Page_146">146</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iii.iv-Page_147">147</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iii.iv-Page_148">148</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iii.iv-Page_149">149</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iii.iv-Page_150">150</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iii.iv-Page_151">151</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iii.iv-Page_152">152</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iii.iv-Page_153">153</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iii.iv-Page_154">154</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iii.iv-Page_155">155</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iii.iv-Page_156">156</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iii.iv-Page_157">157</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iii.iv-Page_158">158</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iii.iv-Page_159">159</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iii.iv-Page_160">160</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iii.iv-Page_161">161</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iii.iv-Page_162">162</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iii.iv-Page_163">163</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iii.iv-Page_164">164</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iii.iv-Page_165">165</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iii.iv-Page_166">166</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iii.iv-Page_167">167</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iii.iv-Page_168">168</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iii.iv-Page_169">169</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iii.iv-Page_170">170</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iii.iv-Page_171">171</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iii.iv-Page_172">172</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iii.iv-Page_173">173</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iii.iv-Page_174">174</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iii.iv-Page_175">175</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iii.iv-Page_176">176</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iii.iv-Page_177">177</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iii.iv-Page_178">178</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iii.iv-Page_179">179</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iii.iv-Page_180">180</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iii.iv-Page_181">181</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iii.iv-Page_182">182</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iii.iv-Page_183">183</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iii.iv-Page_184">184</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iii.iv-Page_185">185</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iii.iv-Page_186">186</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iii.v-Page_187">187</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iii.v-Page_188">188</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iii.v-Page_189">189</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iii.v-Page_190">190</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iii.v-Page_191">191</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iii.v-Page_192">192</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iii.v-Page_193">193</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iii.v-Page_194">194</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iii.v-Page_195">195</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iii.v-Page_196">196</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iii.v-Page_197">197</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iii.v-Page_198">198</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iii.v-Page_199">199</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iii.v-Page_200">200</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iii.v-Page_201">201</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iii.v-Page_202">202</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iii.vi-Page_203">203</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iii.vi-Page_204">204</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iii.vi-Page_205">205</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iii.vi-Page_206">206</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iii.vi-Page_207">207</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iii.vi-Page_208">208</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iii.vii.i-Page_209">209</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iii.vii.i-Page_210">210</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iii.vii.i-Page_211">211</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iii.vii.i-Page_212">212</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iii.vii.i-Page_215">215</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iii.vii.i-Page_214">214</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iii.vii.i-Page_215_1">215</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iii.vii.i-Page_210_1">210</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iii.vii.i-Page_217">217</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iii.vii.ii-Page_218">218</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iii.vii.ii-Page_219">219</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iii.vii.ii-Page_220">220</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iii.vii.ii-Page_221">221</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iii.vii.ii-Page_222">222</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iii.vii.ii-Page_223">223</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iii.vii.ii-Page_224">224</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iii.vii.ii-Page_225">225</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iii.vii.ii-Page_226">226</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iii.vii.ii-Page_227">227</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iii.vii.ii-Page_228">228</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iii.vii.ii-Page_229">229</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iii.vii.ii-Page_230">230</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iii.vii.ii-Page_231">231</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iii.vii.ii-Page_232">232</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iii.vii.ii-Page_233">233</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iii.vii.ii-Page_234">234</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iii.vii.ii-Page_235">235</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iii.vii.ii-Page_236">236</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iii.vii.ii-Page_237">237</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iii.vii.ii-Page_238">238</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iii.vii.ii-Page_239">239</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iii.vii.ii-Page_240">240</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iii.vii.ii-Page_241">241</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iii.vii.ii-Page_242">242</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iii.vii.ii-Page_243">243</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iii.vii.ii-Page_244">244</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iii.vii.ii-Page_245">245</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iii.vii.ii-Page_246">246</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iii.vii.ii-Page_247">247</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iii.vii.ii-Page_248">248</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iii.vii.ii-Page_249">249</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iii.vii.ii-Page_250">250</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iii.vii.ii-Page_251">251</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iii.vii.ii-Page_252">252</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iii.vii.ii-Page_253">253</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iii.vii.ii-Page_254">254</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iii.viii-Page_255">255</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iii.viii-Page_256">256</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iii.viii-Page_257">257</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iii.viii-Page_258">258</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iii.viii-Page_259">259</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iii.viii-Page_260">260</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iii.viii-Page_261">261</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iii.viii-Page_262">262</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iii.viii-Page_263">263</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iii.viii-Page_264">264</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iii.viii-Page_265">265</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iii.viii-Page_266">266</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iii.viii-Page_267">267</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iii.viii-Page_268">268</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iii.viii-Page_269">269</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iii.viii-Page_270">270</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iii.viii-Page_271">271</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iii.viii-Page_272">272</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iii.viii-Page_273">273</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iii.viii-Page_274">274</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iii.viii-Page_275">275</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iii.viii-Page_276">276</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iii.viii-Page_277">277</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iii.viii-Page_278">278</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iii.viii-Page_279">279</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iii.viii-Page_280">280</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iii.viii-Page_281">281</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iii.viii-Page_282">282</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iii.viii-Page_283">283</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iii.viii-Page_284">284</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iii.viii-Page_285">285</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iii.viii-Page_286">286</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iii.viii-Page_287">287</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iii.viii-Page_288">288</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iii.viii-Page_289">289</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iii.viii-Page_290">290</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iii.viii-Page_291">291</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iii.viii-Page_292">292</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iii.viii-Page_293">293</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iii.viii-Page_294">294</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iii.viii-Page_295">295</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iii.viii-Page_296">296</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iii.viii-Page_297">297</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iii.viii-Page_298">298</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iii.viii-Page_299">299</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iii.viii-Page_300">300</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iii.viii-Page_301">301</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iii.viii-Page_302">302</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iii.viii-Page_303">303</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iv.i-Page_304">304</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iv.i-Page_305">305</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iv.i-Page_306">306</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iv.i-Page_307">307</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iv.i-Page_308">308</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iv.i-Page_309">309</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iv.i-Page_310">310</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iv.i-Page_311">311</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iv.i-Page_312">312</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iv.i-Page_313">313</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iv.i-Page_314">314</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iv.i-Page_315">315</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iv.i-Page_316">316</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iv.i-Page_318">318</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iv.i-Page_319">319</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iv.i-Page_320">320</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iv.i-Page_321">321</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iv.i-Page_322">322</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iv.i-Page_323">323</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iv.i-Page_324">324</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iv.i-Page_325">325</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iv.i-Page_326">326</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iv.ii-Page_327">327</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iv.ii-Page_328">328</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iv.ii-Page_329">329</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iv.ii-Page_330">330</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iv.ii-Page_331">331</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iv.ii-Page_332">332</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iv.ii-Page_333">333</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iv.ii-Page_334">334</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iv.ii-Page_335">335</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iv.ii-Page_336">336</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iv.ii-Page_337">337</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iv.ii-Page_338">338</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iv.ii-Page_339">339</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iv.ii-Page_340">340</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iv.ii-Page_341">341</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iv.ii-Page_342">342</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iv.ii-Page_343">343</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iv.ii-Page_344">344</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iv.ii-Page_345">345</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iv.ii-Page_346">346</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iv.ii-Page_347">347</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iv.ii-Page_348">348</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iv.ii-Page_349">349</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iv.ii-Page_350">350</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iv.ii-Page_351">351</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iv.ii-Page_352">352</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iv.ii-Page_353">353</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iv.ii-Page_354">354</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iv.ii-Page_355">355</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iv.ii-Page_356">356</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iv.ii-Page_357">357</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iv.ii-Page_358">358</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iv.ii-Page_359">359</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iv.ii-Page_360">360</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iv.ii-Page_361">361</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iv.ii-Page_362">362</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iv.ii-Page_363">363</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iv.ii-Page_364">364</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iv.ii-Page_365">365</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iv.ii-Page_366">366</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iv.ii-Page_367">367</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iv.ii-Page_368">368</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iv.ii-Page_369">369</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iv.ii-Page_370">370</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iv.ii-Page_371">371</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iv.ii-Page_372">372</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iv.ii-Page_373">373</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iv.ii-Page_374">374</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iv.ii-Page_375">375</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iv.ii-Page_376">376</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iv.ii-Page_377">377</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iv.ii-Page_378">378</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iv.ii-Page_379">379</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iv.ii-Page_380">380</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iv.ii-Page_381">381</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iv.ii-Page_382">382</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iv.ii-Page_383">383</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iv.ii-Page_384">384</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iv.ii-Page_385">385</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iv.ii-Page_386">386</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iv.ii-Page_387">387</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iv.ii-Page_388">388</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iv.ii-Page_389">389</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iv.ii-Page_390">390</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iv.ii-Page_391">391</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iv.ii-Page_392">392</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iv.ii-Page_393">393</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iv.iii-Page_394">394</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iv.iii-Page_395">395</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iv.iii-Page_396">396</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iv.iii-Page_397">397</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iv.iii-Page_398">398</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iv.iii-Page_399">399</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iv.iii-Page_400">400</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iv.iii-Page_401">401</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iv.iii-Page_402">402</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iv.iii-Page_403">403</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iv.iii-Page_404">404</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iv.iii-Page_405">405</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iv.iii-Page_406">406</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iv.iii-Page_407">407</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iv.iii-Page_408">408</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iv.iii-Page_409">409</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iv.iii-Page_401_1">401</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iv.iii-Page_411">411</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iv.iii-Page_412">412</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iv.iii-Page_413">413</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iv.iii-Page_414">414</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iv.iii-Page_415">415</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iv.iii-Page_416">416</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iv.iii-Page_417">417</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iv.iii-Page_418">418</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iv.iii-Page_419">419</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iv.iii-Page_420">420</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iv.iii-Page_421">421</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iv.iii-Page_422">422</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iv.iii-Page_423">423</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iv.iii-Page_424">424</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iv.iii-Page_425">425</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iv.iii-Page_426">426</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iv.iii-Page_427">427</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iv.iii-Page_428">428</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iv.iii-Page_429">429</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iv.iii-Page_430">430</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iv.iii-Page_431">431</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iv.iii-Page_432">432</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iv.iii-Page_453">453</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iv.iii-Page_434">434</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iv.iii-Page_435">435</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iv.iii-Page_436">436</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iv.iii-Page_437">437</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iv.iii-Page_438">438</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iv.iii-Page_439">439</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iv.iii-Page_440">440</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iv.iii-Page_441">441</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iv.iii-Page_442">442</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iv.iii-Page_443">443</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iv.iii-Page_444">444</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iv.iii-Page_445">445</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iv.iii-Page_446">446</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iv.iii-Page_447">447</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iv.iv.i-Page_448">448</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iv.iv.i-Page_449">449</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iv.iv.i-Page_450">450</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iv.iv.i-Page_451">451</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iv.iv.ii-Page_452">452</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iv.iv.ii-Page_453">453</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iv.iv.ii-Page_454">454</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iv.iv.ii-Page_455">455</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iv.iv.ii-Page_456">456</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iv.iv.ii-Page_457">457</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iv.iv.ii-Page_458">458</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iv.iv.ii-Page_459">459</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iv.iv.ii-Page_460">460</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iv.iv.ii-Page_461">461</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iv.iv.iii-Page_462">462</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iv.iv.iii-Page_463">463</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iv.iv.iii-Page_464">464</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iv.iv.iii-Page_465">465</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iv.iv.iv-Page_466">466</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iv.iv.iv-Page_467">467</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iv.iv.iv-Page_468">468</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iv.iv.iv-Page_469">469</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iv.iv.iv-Page_470">470</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iv.iv.iv-Page_471">471</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iv.iv.iv-Page_472">472</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iv.iv.iv-Page_473">473</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iv.iv.iv-Page_474">474</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iv.iv.iv-Page_475">475</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iv.iv.iv-Page_476">476</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iv.iv.iv-Page_477">477</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iv.iv.iv-Page_478">478</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iv.iv.iv-Page_479">479</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iv.iv.iv-Page_480">480</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iv.iv.iv-Page_481">481</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iv.iv.iv-Page_482">482</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iv.iv.iv-Page_483">483</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iv.iv.iv-Page_484">484</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iv.iv.iv-Page_485">485</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iv.iv.iv-Page_486">486</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iv.iv.iv-Page_487">487</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iv.iv.iv-Page_488">488</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iv.iv.iv-Page_489">489</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iv.iv.iv-Page_490">490</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iv.iv.iv-Page_491">491</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iv.iv.v-Page_492">492</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iv.iv.v-Page_493">493</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iv.iv.v-Page_494">494</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iv.iv.v-Page_495">495</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iv.iv.v-Page_496">496</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iv.iv.v-Page_497">497</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iv.iv.v-Page_498">498</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iv.iv.v-Page_499">499</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iv.iv.v-Page_500">500</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iv.iv.v-Page_501">501</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iv.iv.v-Page_502">502</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iv.iv.v-Page_503">503</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iv.iv.v-Page_504">504</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iv.iv.v-Page_505">505</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iv.iv.v-Page_506">506</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iv.iv.v-Page_507">507</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iv.iv.v-Page_508">508</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iv.iv.v-Page_509">509</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iv.iv.v-Page_510">510</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iv.iv.v-Page_511">511</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iv.iv.v-Page_512">512</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iv.iv.v-Page_513">513</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iv.iv.v-Page_514">514</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iv.iv.v-Page_515">515</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iv.iv.v-Page_516">516</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iv.iv.v-Page_517">517</a> 
<a class="TOC" href="#iv.iv.v-Page_518">518</a> 
</p>
</div>



</div2>
</div1>






</ThML.body>
</ThML>
